Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Arthritis / October 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

OTP survey----philosophy questions

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
d'huit - 25 Sep 2005 16:21 GMT
i've been thinking a lot, lately, about blanket philosophical statements
that become culturally inculcated without being questioned.   have also been
thinking how some people, with valid insights, disagree with some of these
blanket philosophical statements, but don't express their insights which
might be of value to others.  so, here's your chance to express
yourself.<smile>

just so everybody knows, there are no right or wrong answers to these
questions.   kind of like, "is the glass half-empty or half-full?" (doesn't
really have to be one or the other, because the glass can be "too big"
and/or the glass can be "too dirty, if you can't tell and have to go around
asking people" etc.)

lots of people have heard this as a general/blanket philosophical statement,
but i'm turning this one into a more specific question (the response to
which doesn't have to be specifically about yourself, but can be).  here's
the blanket statement - "That which doesn't kill me makes me stronger."  and
the question:

1.  Does that which doesn't kill you [sic - always] make you stronger, or
does that which doesn't kill some people make some people . . . ?      the
conclusion (fill in the blank) and thought processes are up to you.<smile>

2.  What other blanket philosophical statement do you disagree with and why?
(expressing your feelings about it, and not just your logic, is also
allowed.)

kate
Diane - 25 Sep 2005 17:30 GMT
boy, kate, you really know how to stir the pot! and there have been no
debates on asa for so long! too quiet around here, huh?

2.  What other blanket philosophical statement do you disagree with and
why?
(expressing your feelings about it, and not just your logic, is also
allowed

i will tell you the one that gets me, but i bet i'm one of the few here
who is bothered by this: "things happen for a reason."

i'm going to quote one of my characters, twenty-something-year-old
Lacey, who responded to this statement better than i can (hmm. is that
a sign of mental illness? quoting one's characters?)

eleven-year-old mackenzie, whose mother died, asks Lacey if she
believes things happen for a reason. Lacey says: "I guess it gives
people comfort to think there's a reason for everything, but I don't
believe it myself. I think people who have something terrible happen to
them have to try to make the best of things. That's our task. That's
harder to do than just thinking that things happen for a reason and
letting it go at that, don't you think? Much harder. . . "

i agree with lacey. she's a smart cookie.

diane
d'huit - 25 Sep 2005 18:55 GMT
LOL!  i think you're safe in quoting your own character, diane, because lots
of your characters are smart cookies.<g>  i agree, "much harder. . ."  btw,
you are not the only one that particular statement bothers.  that one
generally makes me wonder how individual people who say it mean it--- as in
direct cause and effect?  or fatalistically?  or putting the onus on the
people bad things happen to?  or as in imposed lessons to be learned? etc.
etc. cuz i can probably fill a page with what it makes me wonder.

as for my stirring the pot,  i like seeing or hearing and trying to
understand how people think.   helps get the vapor locks out of my brain,
sometimes;-)

kate

> boy, kate, you really know how to stir the pot! and there have been no
> debates on asa for so long! too quiet around here, huh?
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> diane
MikesBrain - 25 Sep 2005 21:07 GMT
2005-09-25, Responding to Diane...

> boy, kate, you really know how to stir the pot! and there have been no
> debates on asa for so long! too quiet around here, huh?

Sorry. I've been a bit busy lately. ;)

You could always discuss iron supplements of course... 8\

Signature

----
* Another squeaking wheel @ http://tinyurl.com/6bf56
* Mike's (curious) Brain  @ http://tinyurl.com/4872c
- Have a nice day, it really does do you good! :)

Harvey R. Stone - 26 Sep 2005 12:26 GMT
> 2005-09-25, Responding to Diane...
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> You could always discuss iron supplements of course... 8\

LOLOLOLOL  Its too early in the morning for that heavy a laugh.

SomBodyElse
Jo Firey - 25 Sep 2005 21:29 GMT
> i've been thinking a lot, lately, about blanket philosophical statements
> that become culturally inculcated without being questioned.   have also
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> why? (expressing your feelings about it, and not just your logic, is also
> allowed.)

The thought "that which does not kill you makes you stronger"  sounds good
and sounds reassuring.  And it fits in nicely with the bible notion that God
will not test us beyond our strength.

Personally I don't believe in either.  Somethings are truly unbearable.
Some damage, either physical or mental does not heal.  And time does not
heal all wounds.

Of course none of us get out of this alive so I don't see much importance in
the argument in any case.

Jo
d'huit - 26 Sep 2005 01:34 GMT
>> i've been thinking a lot, lately, about blanket philosophical statements
>> that become culturally inculcated without being questioned.   have also
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>
> Jo

awwww, noooo.  we don't get out of this alive?  are you sure?   cuz my
bubble is just about ready to burst!    i thought i was going to get to
visit every town in every country on the globe.  sigh . . .<g>

your input was enlightening, jo.  i hadn't made the connection that you did,
until you mentioned it.

kate
Jo Firey - 26 Sep 2005 02:22 GMT
>> Personally I don't believe in either.  Somethings are truly unbearable.
>> Some damage, either physical or mental does not heal.  And time does not
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> kate

Probably not good to get me going on this subject when I'm in kind of a
down, grumpy mood.

I think the reason we want to believe platitudes like these, mentally they
protect us from evil.

Yes bad things happen to good people.  But if we can pretend they do not, we
are safe from the boogey man.  It lets us believe we control the
uncontrollable.

For the most part it is a harmless fantasy.  Whatever gets you through the
night and all of that.

Unless you happen to join the ranks of those to whom bad things happen for
no apparent reason.  And you find yourself being ostracized by society.
Cause deep down we are afraid of those bad things happen to.  If they are
just like us, no one is safe.

Jo

(I seem to be channeling my long dead and very negative and fatalistic
grandmother here tonight.)
d'huit - 26 Sep 2005 04:48 GMT
>>> Personally I don't believe in either.  Somethings are truly unbearable.
>>> Some damage, either physical or mental does not heal.  And time does not
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> (I seem to be channeling my long dead and very negative and fatalistic
> grandmother here tonight.)

i don't think you are being negative.  it looks to me more like you are
examining what you are thinking, which is fine with me.  it seems to me like
you are saying that some platitudes, like that one, are coping mechanisms.
please correct me if i didn't hear you correctly.  btw, jo, you are doing
much better than i would when i'm in a grumpy mood.<chuckling at myself, but
i'm serious about your ability to handle grumpiness>

kate
Navy1 - 26 Sep 2005 22:27 GMT
What really gets me are the "good things that happen to bad people"

Loujean

>>> Personally I don't believe in either.  Somethings are truly unbearable.
>>> Some damage, either physical or mental does not heal.  And time does not
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>(I seem to be channeling my long dead and very negative and fatalistic
>grandmother here tonight.)
MikesBrain - 25 Sep 2005 21:32 GMT
2005-09-25, Responding to d'huit...

[...]
> 1.  Does that which doesn't kill you [sic - always] make
> you stronger, or does that which doesn't kill some people
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> disagree with and why?  (expressing your feelings about
> it, and not just your logic, is also allowed.)

"There's no smoke without fire"

Explain smoke-bombs then. ;)

You've touched an interesting subject here. We do indeed
tend to "soak up" these little gems, as you say, without
really questioning what they actually contain as a
"payload".

I've found myself several times asking myself "Hang on a
minute! Where did I get THAT idea from?" only to find one of
those old "blanket philosophical statements" has been an
unquestioned reference for years.

Another thing I'd ask (just for fun you understand ;) is
this...

How many times have you discovered something you thought you
thought, actually turned out to be an advertising "message"?

Signature

----
* Another squeaking wheel @ http://tinyurl.com/6bf56
* Mike's (curious) Brain  @ http://tinyurl.com/4872c
- Have a nice day, it really does do you good! :)

d'huit - 26 Sep 2005 01:50 GMT
> 2005-09-25, Responding to d'huit...
>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> How many times have you discovered something you thought you
> thought, actually turned out to be an advertising "message"?

aren't smoke bombs made with combustible materials, meaning there has to be
some kind of ignition, or is the smoke in a smoke bomb actually merely
gaseous vapors?

here in the states, a lot of our ads are often based on things already
making their way through universal awareness.  kinda like kj's norm the
gnome's adventures on/through asa and played out in ohio, a couple of years
ago.  most american ad agencys' work is based upon recognition and
identification (to the message you mention), and then, linking those to
product, which is where the creativity comes in.  but as i see it you are
right, in that advertizing has a profoundly in your face way of solidifying
those more subtle blanket philosophical concepts.

kate
MikesBrain - 26 Sep 2005 16:28 GMT
2005-09-26, Responding to d'huit...

[...]
>>> 2.  What other blanket philosophical statement do you
>>> disagree with and why?  (expressing your feelings about
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> meaning there has to be some kind of ignition, or is the
> smoke in a smoke bomb actually merely gaseous vapors?

Hmmm... Of course we'd need to make a distinction between
combustion and actual flames, (but I don't think this thread
is that provocative :)

> here in the states, a lot of our ads are often based on
> things already making their way through universal
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> way of solidifying those more subtle blanket philosophical
> concepts.

Now it gets complicated! 8\

As some studies have shown that about 80% of the "message"
of an ad gets through via the visuals, and we can assume
that the audio (assuming you don't hit the mute) is designed
to match the visuals, adding emphasis and/or distractors
while some subconsious idea gets slipped in there, and, as
you suggest, the whole thing is designed to hijack existing
concepts or at least "ride through" on them, should we
actually seriously question the possible ongoing effect the
almost constant, and clearly ever-present presence ads have
in our lives?

[Woffle=1]
I note with interest that there are also studies that have
indicated that children's brains are physically affected
(and not for the better) by early exposure to TV.

Maybe TVs should  carry a warning, like cigarettes do? 80
[Woffle=0]

Signature

----
* Another squeaking wheel @ http://tinyurl.com/6bf56
* Mike's (curious) Brain  @ http://tinyurl.com/4872c
- Have a nice day, it really does do you good! :)

d'huit - 27 Sep 2005 17:42 GMT
> 2005-09-26, Responding to d'huit...
>
[quoted text clipped - 63 lines]
> Maybe TVs should  carry a warning, like cigarettes do? 80
> [Woffle=0]

LOL!  ummmm . . . isn't that warning a parent's job?

to me, the effects on our lives, of so many ads, is pretty apparent.  want,
want, want, spend, spend, spend, buy, buy, buy, clutter, clutter, clutter,
toss, toss, toss.  there's rarely anymore fix-it/repair-it or the old yankee
ingenuity---make it yourself, if you really need it, or the do without, if
it isn't absolutely necessary.   and hey, i'm a consumer too.

kate
Harvey R. Stone - 27 Sep 2005 19:14 GMT
> LOL!  ummmm . . . isn't that warning a parent's job?
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> without, if it isn't absolutely necessary.   and hey, i'm a consumer too.
> kate

Hhhhm,  Well said,,,, If you expand the thinking here, can we say the same
thing about cooking???,,,,,Oh my, who is going to teach our children how to
cook and prepare food to be eaten?    What is up to parents can really be a
slap in the face to today's world.   Oh my,,, make judgments of what is good
for a child to watch on Tv????   Judgments on when and if a child can go to
someone's house for a party,,,, over night you say??
Aaaah me,,, I am glad my children are grown.....
Harv
MikesBrain - 27 Sep 2005 21:48 GMT
2005-09-27, Responding to Harvey R. Stone...

>> LOL!  ummmm . . . isn't that warning a parent's job?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> party,,,, over night you say?? Aaaah me,,, I am glad my
> children are grown..... Harv

This reminds me of a recent program on UKTV where the
presenter, who spent the series in different parts of the
world learning from different people's how to survive and
live in all kinds of environments, was faced with the task
of teaching young men from Venuzuala how to do the bushcraft
their parents had lost the skills for. Kinda weird that, a
white guy from England teaching folks elsewhere their own
native skills.

(The guy's name is Ray Mears BTW. Very interesting!)

Signature

----
* Another squeaking wheel @ http://tinyurl.com/6bf56
* Mike's (curious) Brain  @ http://tinyurl.com/4872c
- Have a nice day, it really does do you good! :)

Navy1 - 26 Sep 2005 22:25 GMT
Those GEICO ads get me every time!!!  

Loujean

>2005-09-25, Responding to d'huit...
>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>How many times have you discovered something you thought you
>thought, actually turned out to be an advertising "message"?
MikesBrain - 27 Sep 2005 11:21 GMT
2005-09-26, Responding to Navy1...

[...]
>>I've found myself several times asking myself "Hang on a
>>minute! Where did I get THAT idea from?" only to find one of
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Those GEICO ads get me every time!!!  

Whutza GEICO ad?  (Me live in Englishland. ;)

Signature

----
* Another squeaking wheel @ http://tinyurl.com/6bf56
* Mike's (curious) Brain  @ http://tinyurl.com/4872c
- Have a nice day, it really does do you good! :)

Navy1 - 01 Oct 2005 21:36 GMT
>2005-09-26, Responding to Navy1...
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
>Whutza GEICO ad?  (Me live in Englishland. ;)

GEICO is a Government .Insurance Company.  They handle car, medical,
life, etc,.  The ads start out with something that is perfectly
straightforward.  For example, the bit will start with an obviously
very healthy looking individual who is advertising for a good diet
plan.  He asks the woman what she would think if he told her that the
rates were very low.  She says she thinks that would be great.  Then
he says, "Well, I've got great news - I just saved a bundle on my car
insurance with GEICO!"..........

I probably mangled it, but I think you get the idea.  The first 30
seconds or so, it sounds like a legitimate ad (commercial), and then
they lower the boom.

Loujean
MikesBrain - 01 Oct 2005 22:07 GMT
2005-10-01, Responding to Navy1...

>>2005-09-26, Responding to Navy1...
>>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> seconds or so, it sounds like a legitimate ad (commercial), and then
> they lower the boom.

Ah, gottit. Same old shpiel as ever then.

While we're on the subject...

www.thesunmachine.net/features/telly_addicts.htm

...looked slightly relevant. (Some pretty good humour pics
in there somewhere too.)

Signature

----
* Another squeaking wheel @ http://tinyurl.com/6bf56
* Mike's (curious) Brain  @ http://tinyurl.com/4872c
- Have a nice day, it really does do you good! :)

Rosemarie Shiver - 26 Sep 2005 05:39 GMT
Ack, O'Kate,

  I'll answer as a trained thinker. You'd be amazed at how many people have
never been taught thinking as a subject in and of itself. There are far too
few trained thinkers around -- but sumbuddy's gotta do it.

  A lil' bit of arsenic IS good for ya and indeed makes ya stronger. Just a
wee little bit in your diet, now and then. Don't add it: most of us get it
from soils or from fresh veggies. Won't kill ya...but a bunch of arsenic
ingested repeatedly fertrue will. So there. :-)

  Feeling-wise...it is easier going thru hard things more than once...b'cuz
just the familiarity of the hard times takes the edge offa the hardness of
'em. I'm rather unique in that perspective since I dunno anyone else who had
Andrew, and Charley, and Frances and Jeanne. By the time Frances rolled thru
we were all strong 'round here. Friends comment about how strong I
am....wasn't easy at all getting here but I obviously ain't been killed by
none of the very horrid thingies as of yet.

    Lastly...steel that isn't tempered is brittle. It's gotta be red-hot
then plunged into very cold water to temper it and make all the layers
adhere to each other as strongly as possible. It's a rather spectacular show
of steam and popping and noise.  Makes it anneal so it won't come apart.
Hard and able to be honed to a fine edge rather than friable and brittle.

   I'm only brittle about those who think I'm bitter. No way...hard times
make ya optimistic. If I got thru THAT and then THAT....ya know? YOU,
yerself, do know, Katester.

   I do know for a fact if ya truly understand the source of the adages
you'll know why any particular one lasts thru multiple generations. There's
a kernel of truth that doesn't change no matter what mood yer in. It's
really important that kids talk about all kinds of things with their
elders...so the cultural values get passed on. Who can argue against "Loose
lips sink ships" even tho' they literally don't anymore? They did for my own
grandparents and that's good enuff for me....and for all who understand how
important it was back then not to let loved ones ashore know where you were
or were going. :-) If there's one thing that Larry R.shared well at ASA it
was the historical context of adages. One can never think of  brass balls
and monkeys the same since he shared that. <g>

Hugs from Rosie

Signature

"If you wanna get it done, you gotta fight for yourself." -- Meat Loaf, Bat
Outta Hell II

> i've been thinking a lot, lately, about blanket philosophical statements
> that become culturally inculcated without being questioned.   have also been
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> kate
Navy1 - 26 Sep 2005 22:30 GMT
The reverse is true, also.  We parents need to talk to our kids.  I've
tried and I think we have a good connection.  My one son is quick to
get testy, but he always calls back and apologizes for getting mad
(not for the stand he took - LOL).

Loujean

>    I do know for a fact if ya truly understand the source of the adages
>you'll know why any particular one lasts thru multiple generations. There's
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>Hugs from Rosie
d'huit - 27 Sep 2005 18:10 GMT
> Ack, O'Kate,
>
[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
>
> Hugs from Rosie

having grown up exposed to spanish proverbs, i certainly can identify with
historical, as well as, regional context.LOL

but i think "context" is the key word in what you've said.  i know, for
example, that butch's battle for life did not make me stronger.  it *was*
instrumental in making me know what feeling helpless/powerless and hopeless
felt like, no matter how much i learned and applied; and how fear and/or
pain can be turned into anger, both outwardly and inwardly.  if anything,
rather than stronger, it made me feel much more vulnerable, in many ways,
and more prone to second guessing myself, less apt to trust my instincts and
reasoning processes and less apt to rely on or act on those instincts and
reasoning processes.

kate
johnie - 26 Sep 2005 20:07 GMT
> 1.  Does that which doesn't kill you [sic - always] make you stronger.

With the help of tools such as MRI imaging, able to detect actual
changes in brain anatomy, it appears that what doesn't kill you may
still permanently weaken you. There have been several investigations
recently, one of the most extensive with child abuse victims showing
that damage done is irreversible and extensive. Neurons are completely
killed off and in many cases the ability for the affected part of the
brain to produce new neurons is destroyed. Not a good thing.

It looks to me (from limited reading) that a valid argument based on
good science can now be made that...///that which doesn't kill you
'CAN' make you weaker forever///...

johnie
Gwen Love - 26 Sep 2005 21:13 GMT
Hello Johnie!  How nice to see you again.  Let us know how you are doing
these days, okay?
Gwen

>> 1.  Does that which doesn't kill you [sic - always] make you stronger.
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> johnie
Navy1 - 26 Sep 2005 22:35 GMT
I have to agree with you.  I read something recently about a couple
who took in a child who had been neglected as a baby at the age of
bonding.  He had lost the ability to love.  They were patient and were
able to teach him how to love again.  I'm afraid I wouldn't have the
patience.  To me, so many things are illogical and I just can't deal
with those.  They want me to do a lot of walking for exercise to bring
up my good cholesterol but my knees hurt if I do?  The old rock and a
hard place.

Loujean

>> 1.  Does that which doesn't kill you [sic - always] make you stronger.
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
>johnie
d'huit - 27 Sep 2005 18:15 GMT
>> 1.  Does that which doesn't kill you [sic - always] make you stronger.
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> johnie

i think your summation can be applied to a lot of things, johnie.  it's so
nice to see you, again, guy.

kate
Squirrely - 26 Sep 2005 20:45 GMT
sorry I said that. Oh well you live and learn.

Signature

Love and hugs to all
Good thoughts coming your way too.

Squirrely Jo

> i've been thinking a lot, lately, about blanket philosophical statements
> that become culturally inculcated without being questioned.   have also
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> kate
d'huit - 27 Sep 2005 18:18 GMT
> sorry I said that. Oh well you live and learn.

hunh?  i hope you don't think what i was speaking of was directly related to
something you said, sj.  far be it, hon.  waaaaaay far be it!

kate

>> i've been thinking a lot, lately, about blanket philosophical statements
>> that become culturally inculcated without being questioned.   have also
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>>
>> kate
Squirrely - 28 Sep 2005 16:18 GMT
ok sorry I took that the wrong way then. not feeling good and touchy.

Signature

Love and hugs to all
Good thoughts coming your way too.

Squirrely Jo

> hunh?  i hope you don't think what i was speaking of was directly related
> to something you said, sj.  far be it, hon.  waaaaaay far be it!
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>>> conclusion (fill in the blank) and thought processes are up to
>>> you.<smile>

>>> kate
Nann Bell - 28 Sep 2005 15:18 GMT
> 1.  Does that which doesn't kill you [sic - always] make you stronger, or
> does that which doesn't kill some people make some people . . . ?      the
> conclusion (fill in the blank) and thought processes are up to you.<smile>

Personally speaking, it does, eventually, make me stronger in some ways,
perhaps mentally while weakening me physically, etc. but I am stronger in
some ways.  For example, my first huge flare up of PA taught me I *could*
survive in enomrous pain - I surely didn't want to do it again, but there was
reassurance and strngth in knowing that I had done it.  But I come from a
generally positive, strong, supportive family of survivors.

People who haven't had the emotional advantages I've had in my family though
can be greatly weakened by trials and may end up more withdrawn or fearful of
the world.  I find the people who make that statement in reference to their
own experiences are generally the ones who are made stronger by "that which
doesn't kill" them.  But I will never say that someone else.  I think it can
be ultimately a harmful thing to say to someone in the midst of suffering by
seeming to discount what they are experiencing at the time.  I stick to hugs,
hang in there's, listening and helping however I can.

> 2.  What other blanket philosophical statement do you disagree with and why?
> (expressing your feelings about it, and not just your logic, is also
> allowed.)

my biggies are "It's God's will" and "God doesn't give you more than you can
handle".  My arguments with those statements are fine points, but important
ones to me in my own journey of faith.  I strongly believe that God created a
world set up to operate  on certain physical laws.  For instance, if you get
the right combination of genes and environment, you get an illness.  God,
however you draw close to Him/Her (I personally see God as *beyond* gender,
but our language doesn't allow for that!) will provide the courage, strength,
resources, and grace that you need to get through whatever it is.  I  don't
believe it is EVER God's will that we suffer in any way, but rather it is
God's will that we turn to God and to others around us to help and guide us
through our trials and tribulations with as little suffering as possible.
Signature

Nann
remove the Gator cheer to email me
Simply the thing I am shall make me live --- William Shakespeare

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.