Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Arthritis / October 2005
OTP survey----philosophy questions
|
|
Thread rating:  |
d'huit - 25 Sep 2005 16:21 GMT i've been thinking a lot, lately, about blanket philosophical statements that become culturally inculcated without being questioned. have also been thinking how some people, with valid insights, disagree with some of these blanket philosophical statements, but don't express their insights which might be of value to others. so, here's your chance to express yourself.<smile>
just so everybody knows, there are no right or wrong answers to these questions. kind of like, "is the glass half-empty or half-full?" (doesn't really have to be one or the other, because the glass can be "too big" and/or the glass can be "too dirty, if you can't tell and have to go around asking people" etc.)
lots of people have heard this as a general/blanket philosophical statement, but i'm turning this one into a more specific question (the response to which doesn't have to be specifically about yourself, but can be). here's the blanket statement - "That which doesn't kill me makes me stronger." and the question:
1. Does that which doesn't kill you [sic - always] make you stronger, or does that which doesn't kill some people make some people . . . ? the conclusion (fill in the blank) and thought processes are up to you.<smile>
2. What other blanket philosophical statement do you disagree with and why? (expressing your feelings about it, and not just your logic, is also allowed.)
kate
Diane - 25 Sep 2005 17:30 GMT boy, kate, you really know how to stir the pot! and there have been no debates on asa for so long! too quiet around here, huh?
2. What other blanket philosophical statement do you disagree with and why? (expressing your feelings about it, and not just your logic, is also allowed
i will tell you the one that gets me, but i bet i'm one of the few here who is bothered by this: "things happen for a reason."
i'm going to quote one of my characters, twenty-something-year-old Lacey, who responded to this statement better than i can (hmm. is that a sign of mental illness? quoting one's characters?)
eleven-year-old mackenzie, whose mother died, asks Lacey if she believes things happen for a reason. Lacey says: "I guess it gives people comfort to think there's a reason for everything, but I don't believe it myself. I think people who have something terrible happen to them have to try to make the best of things. That's our task. That's harder to do than just thinking that things happen for a reason and letting it go at that, don't you think? Much harder. . . "
i agree with lacey. she's a smart cookie.
diane
d'huit - 25 Sep 2005 18:55 GMT LOL! i think you're safe in quoting your own character, diane, because lots of your characters are smart cookies.<g> i agree, "much harder. . ." btw, you are not the only one that particular statement bothers. that one generally makes me wonder how individual people who say it mean it--- as in direct cause and effect? or fatalistically? or putting the onus on the people bad things happen to? or as in imposed lessons to be learned? etc. etc. cuz i can probably fill a page with what it makes me wonder.
as for my stirring the pot, i like seeing or hearing and trying to understand how people think. helps get the vapor locks out of my brain, sometimes;-)
kate
> boy, kate, you really know how to stir the pot! and there have been no > debates on asa for so long! too quiet around here, huh? [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > > diane MikesBrain - 25 Sep 2005 21:07 GMT 2005-09-25, Responding to Diane...
> boy, kate, you really know how to stir the pot! and there have been no > debates on asa for so long! too quiet around here, huh? Sorry. I've been a bit busy lately. ;)
You could always discuss iron supplements of course... 8\
 Signature ---- * Another squeaking wheel @ http://tinyurl.com/6bf56 * Mike's (curious) Brain @ http://tinyurl.com/4872c - Have a nice day, it really does do you good! :)
Harvey R. Stone - 26 Sep 2005 12:26 GMT > 2005-09-25, Responding to Diane... >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > You could always discuss iron supplements of course... 8\ LOLOLOLOL Its too early in the morning for that heavy a laugh.
SomBodyElse
Jo Firey - 25 Sep 2005 21:29 GMT > i've been thinking a lot, lately, about blanket philosophical statements > that become culturally inculcated without being questioned. have also [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > why? (expressing your feelings about it, and not just your logic, is also > allowed.) The thought "that which does not kill you makes you stronger" sounds good and sounds reassuring. And it fits in nicely with the bible notion that God will not test us beyond our strength.
Personally I don't believe in either. Somethings are truly unbearable. Some damage, either physical or mental does not heal. And time does not heal all wounds.
Of course none of us get out of this alive so I don't see much importance in the argument in any case.
Jo
d'huit - 26 Sep 2005 01:34 GMT >> i've been thinking a lot, lately, about blanket philosophical statements >> that become culturally inculcated without being questioned. have also [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > > Jo awwww, noooo. we don't get out of this alive? are you sure? cuz my bubble is just about ready to burst! i thought i was going to get to visit every town in every country on the globe. sigh . . .<g>
your input was enlightening, jo. i hadn't made the connection that you did, until you mentioned it.
kate
Jo Firey - 26 Sep 2005 02:22 GMT >> Personally I don't believe in either. Somethings are truly unbearable. >> Some damage, either physical or mental does not heal. And time does not [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > kate Probably not good to get me going on this subject when I'm in kind of a down, grumpy mood.
I think the reason we want to believe platitudes like these, mentally they protect us from evil.
Yes bad things happen to good people. But if we can pretend they do not, we are safe from the boogey man. It lets us believe we control the uncontrollable.
For the most part it is a harmless fantasy. Whatever gets you through the night and all of that.
Unless you happen to join the ranks of those to whom bad things happen for no apparent reason. And you find yourself being ostracized by society. Cause deep down we are afraid of those bad things happen to. If they are just like us, no one is safe.
Jo
(I seem to be channeling my long dead and very negative and fatalistic grandmother here tonight.)
d'huit - 26 Sep 2005 04:48 GMT >>> Personally I don't believe in either. Somethings are truly unbearable. >>> Some damage, either physical or mental does not heal. And time does not [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > (I seem to be channeling my long dead and very negative and fatalistic > grandmother here tonight.) i don't think you are being negative. it looks to me more like you are examining what you are thinking, which is fine with me. it seems to me like you are saying that some platitudes, like that one, are coping mechanisms. please correct me if i didn't hear you correctly. btw, jo, you are doing much better than i would when i'm in a grumpy mood.<chuckling at myself, but i'm serious about your ability to handle grumpiness>
kate
Navy1 - 26 Sep 2005 22:27 GMT What really gets me are the "good things that happen to bad people"
Loujean
>>> Personally I don't believe in either. Somethings are truly unbearable. >>> Some damage, either physical or mental does not heal. And time does not [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] >(I seem to be channeling my long dead and very negative and fatalistic >grandmother here tonight.) MikesBrain - 25 Sep 2005 21:32 GMT 2005-09-25, Responding to d'huit...
[...]
> 1. Does that which doesn't kill you [sic - always] make > you stronger, or does that which doesn't kill some people [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > disagree with and why? (expressing your feelings about > it, and not just your logic, is also allowed.) "There's no smoke without fire"
Explain smoke-bombs then. ;)
You've touched an interesting subject here. We do indeed tend to "soak up" these little gems, as you say, without really questioning what they actually contain as a "payload".
I've found myself several times asking myself "Hang on a minute! Where did I get THAT idea from?" only to find one of those old "blanket philosophical statements" has been an unquestioned reference for years.
Another thing I'd ask (just for fun you understand ;) is this...
How many times have you discovered something you thought you thought, actually turned out to be an advertising "message"?
 Signature ---- * Another squeaking wheel @ http://tinyurl.com/6bf56 * Mike's (curious) Brain @ http://tinyurl.com/4872c - Have a nice day, it really does do you good! :)
d'huit - 26 Sep 2005 01:50 GMT > 2005-09-25, Responding to d'huit... > [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > How many times have you discovered something you thought you > thought, actually turned out to be an advertising "message"? aren't smoke bombs made with combustible materials, meaning there has to be some kind of ignition, or is the smoke in a smoke bomb actually merely gaseous vapors?
here in the states, a lot of our ads are often based on things already making their way through universal awareness. kinda like kj's norm the gnome's adventures on/through asa and played out in ohio, a couple of years ago. most american ad agencys' work is based upon recognition and identification (to the message you mention), and then, linking those to product, which is where the creativity comes in. but as i see it you are right, in that advertizing has a profoundly in your face way of solidifying those more subtle blanket philosophical concepts.
kate
MikesBrain - 26 Sep 2005 16:28 GMT 2005-09-26, Responding to d'huit...
[...]
>>> 2. What other blanket philosophical statement do you >>> disagree with and why? (expressing your feelings about [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > meaning there has to be some kind of ignition, or is the > smoke in a smoke bomb actually merely gaseous vapors? Hmmm... Of course we'd need to make a distinction between combustion and actual flames, (but I don't think this thread is that provocative :)
> here in the states, a lot of our ads are often based on > things already making their way through universal [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > way of solidifying those more subtle blanket philosophical > concepts. Now it gets complicated! 8\
As some studies have shown that about 80% of the "message" of an ad gets through via the visuals, and we can assume that the audio (assuming you don't hit the mute) is designed to match the visuals, adding emphasis and/or distractors while some subconsious idea gets slipped in there, and, as you suggest, the whole thing is designed to hijack existing concepts or at least "ride through" on them, should we actually seriously question the possible ongoing effect the almost constant, and clearly ever-present presence ads have in our lives?
[Woffle=1] I note with interest that there are also studies that have indicated that children's brains are physically affected (and not for the better) by early exposure to TV.
Maybe TVs should carry a warning, like cigarettes do? 80 [Woffle=0]
 Signature ---- * Another squeaking wheel @ http://tinyurl.com/6bf56 * Mike's (curious) Brain @ http://tinyurl.com/4872c - Have a nice day, it really does do you good! :)
d'huit - 27 Sep 2005 17:42 GMT > 2005-09-26, Responding to d'huit... > [quoted text clipped - 63 lines] > Maybe TVs should carry a warning, like cigarettes do? 80 > [Woffle=0] LOL! ummmm . . . isn't that warning a parent's job?
to me, the effects on our lives, of so many ads, is pretty apparent. want, want, want, spend, spend, spend, buy, buy, buy, clutter, clutter, clutter, toss, toss, toss. there's rarely anymore fix-it/repair-it or the old yankee ingenuity---make it yourself, if you really need it, or the do without, if it isn't absolutely necessary. and hey, i'm a consumer too.
kate
Harvey R. Stone - 27 Sep 2005 19:14 GMT > LOL! ummmm . . . isn't that warning a parent's job? > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > without, if it isn't absolutely necessary. and hey, i'm a consumer too. > kate Hhhhm, Well said,,,, If you expand the thinking here, can we say the same thing about cooking???,,,,,Oh my, who is going to teach our children how to cook and prepare food to be eaten? What is up to parents can really be a slap in the face to today's world. Oh my,,, make judgments of what is good for a child to watch on Tv???? Judgments on when and if a child can go to someone's house for a party,,,, over night you say?? Aaaah me,,, I am glad my children are grown..... Harv
MikesBrain - 27 Sep 2005 21:48 GMT 2005-09-27, Responding to Harvey R. Stone...
>> LOL! ummmm . . . isn't that warning a parent's job? >> [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > party,,,, over night you say?? Aaaah me,,, I am glad my > children are grown..... Harv This reminds me of a recent program on UKTV where the presenter, who spent the series in different parts of the world learning from different people's how to survive and live in all kinds of environments, was faced with the task of teaching young men from Venuzuala how to do the bushcraft their parents had lost the skills for. Kinda weird that, a white guy from England teaching folks elsewhere their own native skills.
(The guy's name is Ray Mears BTW. Very interesting!)
 Signature ---- * Another squeaking wheel @ http://tinyurl.com/6bf56 * Mike's (curious) Brain @ http://tinyurl.com/4872c - Have a nice day, it really does do you good! :)
Navy1 - 26 Sep 2005 22:25 GMT Those GEICO ads get me every time!!!
Loujean
>2005-09-25, Responding to d'huit... > [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] >How many times have you discovered something you thought you >thought, actually turned out to be an advertising "message"? MikesBrain - 27 Sep 2005 11:21 GMT 2005-09-26, Responding to Navy1...
[...]
>>I've found myself several times asking myself "Hang on a >>minute! Where did I get THAT idea from?" only to find one of [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Those GEICO ads get me every time!!! Whutza GEICO ad? (Me live in Englishland. ;)
 Signature ---- * Another squeaking wheel @ http://tinyurl.com/6bf56 * Mike's (curious) Brain @ http://tinyurl.com/4872c - Have a nice day, it really does do you good! :)
Navy1 - 01 Oct 2005 21:36 GMT >2005-09-26, Responding to Navy1... > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > >Whutza GEICO ad? (Me live in Englishland. ;) GEICO is a Government .Insurance Company. They handle car, medical, life, etc,. The ads start out with something that is perfectly straightforward. For example, the bit will start with an obviously very healthy looking individual who is advertising for a good diet plan. He asks the woman what she would think if he told her that the rates were very low. She says she thinks that would be great. Then he says, "Well, I've got great news - I just saved a bundle on my car insurance with GEICO!"..........
I probably mangled it, but I think you get the idea. The first 30 seconds or so, it sounds like a legitimate ad (commercial), and then they lower the boom.
Loujean
MikesBrain - 01 Oct 2005 22:07 GMT 2005-10-01, Responding to Navy1...
>>2005-09-26, Responding to Navy1... >> [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > seconds or so, it sounds like a legitimate ad (commercial), and then > they lower the boom. Ah, gottit. Same old shpiel as ever then.
While we're on the subject...
www.thesunmachine.net/features/telly_addicts.htm
...looked slightly relevant. (Some pretty good humour pics in there somewhere too.)
 Signature ---- * Another squeaking wheel @ http://tinyurl.com/6bf56 * Mike's (curious) Brain @ http://tinyurl.com/4872c - Have a nice day, it really does do you good! :)
Rosemarie Shiver - 26 Sep 2005 05:39 GMT Ack, O'Kate,
I'll answer as a trained thinker. You'd be amazed at how many people have never been taught thinking as a subject in and of itself. There are far too few trained thinkers around -- but sumbuddy's gotta do it.
A lil' bit of arsenic IS good for ya and indeed makes ya stronger. Just a wee little bit in your diet, now and then. Don't add it: most of us get it from soils or from fresh veggies. Won't kill ya...but a bunch of arsenic ingested repeatedly fertrue will. So there. :-)
Feeling-wise...it is easier going thru hard things more than once...b'cuz just the familiarity of the hard times takes the edge offa the hardness of 'em. I'm rather unique in that perspective since I dunno anyone else who had Andrew, and Charley, and Frances and Jeanne. By the time Frances rolled thru we were all strong 'round here. Friends comment about how strong I am....wasn't easy at all getting here but I obviously ain't been killed by none of the very horrid thingies as of yet.
Lastly...steel that isn't tempered is brittle. It's gotta be red-hot then plunged into very cold water to temper it and make all the layers adhere to each other as strongly as possible. It's a rather spectacular show of steam and popping and noise. Makes it anneal so it won't come apart. Hard and able to be honed to a fine edge rather than friable and brittle.
I'm only brittle about those who think I'm bitter. No way...hard times make ya optimistic. If I got thru THAT and then THAT....ya know? YOU, yerself, do know, Katester.
I do know for a fact if ya truly understand the source of the adages you'll know why any particular one lasts thru multiple generations. There's a kernel of truth that doesn't change no matter what mood yer in. It's really important that kids talk about all kinds of things with their elders...so the cultural values get passed on. Who can argue against "Loose lips sink ships" even tho' they literally don't anymore? They did for my own grandparents and that's good enuff for me....and for all who understand how important it was back then not to let loved ones ashore know where you were or were going. :-) If there's one thing that Larry R.shared well at ASA it was the historical context of adages. One can never think of brass balls and monkeys the same since he shared that. <g>
Hugs from Rosie
 Signature "If you wanna get it done, you gotta fight for yourself." -- Meat Loaf, Bat Outta Hell II
> i've been thinking a lot, lately, about blanket philosophical statements > that become culturally inculcated without being questioned. have also been [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > > kate Navy1 - 26 Sep 2005 22:30 GMT The reverse is true, also. We parents need to talk to our kids. I've tried and I think we have a good connection. My one son is quick to get testy, but he always calls back and apologizes for getting mad (not for the stand he took - LOL).
Loujean
> I do know for a fact if ya truly understand the source of the adages >you'll know why any particular one lasts thru multiple generations. There's [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > >Hugs from Rosie d'huit - 27 Sep 2005 18:10 GMT > Ack, O'Kate, > [quoted text clipped - 50 lines] > > Hugs from Rosie having grown up exposed to spanish proverbs, i certainly can identify with historical, as well as, regional context.LOL
but i think "context" is the key word in what you've said. i know, for example, that butch's battle for life did not make me stronger. it *was* instrumental in making me know what feeling helpless/powerless and hopeless felt like, no matter how much i learned and applied; and how fear and/or pain can be turned into anger, both outwardly and inwardly. if anything, rather than stronger, it made me feel much more vulnerable, in many ways, and more prone to second guessing myself, less apt to trust my instincts and reasoning processes and less apt to rely on or act on those instincts and reasoning processes.
kate
johnie - 26 Sep 2005 20:07 GMT > 1. Does that which doesn't kill you [sic - always] make you stronger. With the help of tools such as MRI imaging, able to detect actual changes in brain anatomy, it appears that what doesn't kill you may still permanently weaken you. There have been several investigations recently, one of the most extensive with child abuse victims showing that damage done is irreversible and extensive. Neurons are completely killed off and in many cases the ability for the affected part of the brain to produce new neurons is destroyed. Not a good thing.
It looks to me (from limited reading) that a valid argument based on good science can now be made that...///that which doesn't kill you 'CAN' make you weaker forever///...
johnie
Gwen Love - 26 Sep 2005 21:13 GMT Hello Johnie! How nice to see you again. Let us know how you are doing these days, okay? Gwen
>> 1. Does that which doesn't kill you [sic - always] make you stronger. > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > johnie Navy1 - 26 Sep 2005 22:35 GMT I have to agree with you. I read something recently about a couple who took in a child who had been neglected as a baby at the age of bonding. He had lost the ability to love. They were patient and were able to teach him how to love again. I'm afraid I wouldn't have the patience. To me, so many things are illogical and I just can't deal with those. They want me to do a lot of walking for exercise to bring up my good cholesterol but my knees hurt if I do? The old rock and a hard place.
Loujean
>> 1. Does that which doesn't kill you [sic - always] make you stronger. > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > >johnie d'huit - 27 Sep 2005 18:15 GMT >> 1. Does that which doesn't kill you [sic - always] make you stronger. > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > johnie i think your summation can be applied to a lot of things, johnie. it's so nice to see you, again, guy.
kate
Squirrely - 26 Sep 2005 20:45 GMT sorry I said that. Oh well you live and learn.
 Signature Love and hugs to all Good thoughts coming your way too.
Squirrely Jo
> i've been thinking a lot, lately, about blanket philosophical statements > that become culturally inculcated without being questioned. have also [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > > kate d'huit - 27 Sep 2005 18:18 GMT > sorry I said that. Oh well you live and learn. hunh? i hope you don't think what i was speaking of was directly related to something you said, sj. far be it, hon. waaaaaay far be it!
kate
>> i've been thinking a lot, lately, about blanket philosophical statements >> that become culturally inculcated without being questioned. have also [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] >> >> kate Squirrely - 28 Sep 2005 16:18 GMT ok sorry I took that the wrong way then. not feeling good and touchy.
 Signature Love and hugs to all Good thoughts coming your way too.
Squirrely Jo
> hunh? i hope you don't think what i was speaking of was directly related > to something you said, sj. far be it, hon. waaaaaay far be it! [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >>> conclusion (fill in the blank) and thought processes are up to >>> you.<smile>
>>> kate Nann Bell - 28 Sep 2005 15:18 GMT > 1. Does that which doesn't kill you [sic - always] make you stronger, or > does that which doesn't kill some people make some people . . . ? the > conclusion (fill in the blank) and thought processes are up to you.<smile> Personally speaking, it does, eventually, make me stronger in some ways, perhaps mentally while weakening me physically, etc. but I am stronger in some ways. For example, my first huge flare up of PA taught me I *could* survive in enomrous pain - I surely didn't want to do it again, but there was reassurance and strngth in knowing that I had done it. But I come from a generally positive, strong, supportive family of survivors.
People who haven't had the emotional advantages I've had in my family though can be greatly weakened by trials and may end up more withdrawn or fearful of the world. I find the people who make that statement in reference to their own experiences are generally the ones who are made stronger by "that which doesn't kill" them. But I will never say that someone else. I think it can be ultimately a harmful thing to say to someone in the midst of suffering by seeming to discount what they are experiencing at the time. I stick to hugs, hang in there's, listening and helping however I can.
> 2. What other blanket philosophical statement do you disagree with and why? > (expressing your feelings about it, and not just your logic, is also > allowed.) my biggies are "It's God's will" and "God doesn't give you more than you can handle". My arguments with those statements are fine points, but important ones to me in my own journey of faith. I strongly believe that God created a world set up to operate on certain physical laws. For instance, if you get the right combination of genes and environment, you get an illness. God, however you draw close to Him/Her (I personally see God as *beyond* gender, but our language doesn't allow for that!) will provide the courage, strength, resources, and grace that you need to get through whatever it is. I don't believe it is EVER God's will that we suffer in any way, but rather it is God's will that we turn to God and to others around us to help and guide us through our trials and tribulations with as little suffering as possible.
 Signature Nann remove the Gator cheer to email me Simply the thing I am shall make me live --- William Shakespeare
|
|
|