> uh hunh. yeppers, the city's protection sure did fail, harv. wonder
> where the rebumlingcans put that 20 billion dollars, to strengthen the new
> orleans' levees, that rebumlingcans cut from the budget awhile back? it's
> probably in that transportation bill that's full of more pork than
> transportation. but it's all the fault of the "dems" isn't it, harv?
The condition of those dikes and the fact that the gov. did not call the
guard in right away is there fault and time will prove that to even you.
i
> mean, local "dems" had all the resources they needed, to contend with the
> very sudden power, sewage, water, highway and infrastructure failures that
> just happened to happen all at once in the 34th largest american city,
> didn't they, harv?
No,,, they did not but it was the dikes failing that caused all of that.
heck yeah, and that's pretty apparent, isn't it? and
> lousianna's nation guard was right handy for them to avail themselves of
> in this time of dire need, wasn't it harv?
That is up to the gov. of the state and not the Federal gov. but you surely
know that.
oh, that's right, most of them are
> in iraq and afganistan. the "dems" musta forgot that.
That is political bull sh.t and you know it.
guess louisianna's
> "dems" shoulda drafted their own army before katrina hit. gee, and how
> stupid are people who barely make it from paycheck to paycheck not to have
> enough money to get out of the city when evacuation is called for? heck,
> why didn't they just walk to texas?
Are you making some kind of point or talking high school politics.
> my point is---QUIT politizing this, harv.
Read your own words.
you don't know what you are
> talking about and sound like you are dribbling down your shirt. this is a
> human tragedy of enormous proportions. lots of things contributed to its
> dynamics and not just "dems"!
You can not substitute personal abuse with your words for clear headed
thinking.
> i applaud texas, and all of the surrounding states, for the generosity of
> spirit they've demonstrated to the victims of colossal national disaster
> relief inadequacy. i applaud all the people of the rest of this country,
> and other countries, for their willingness to also give from their hearts.
> but, like most of them, i feel i could do no less than that.
You and I agree on this.
> btw, i think if my home were filling up with katrina storm surges as fast
> as new orleans' homes were, i don't think i'd even remember where i put my
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> washing out of the house with the storm surge and the rest of our
> belongings.
Like Rosie,,,, you can not see that the average person should be as ready as
they can to face
every type of threat. You make light of what a person should do if they
take personal
responsibility for as much of their life as they can. Everyone should of
got the hell out just
like the mayor said but there was no plan for the people that could not.
That can not be
changed now,,,,,,, all of us will do the best we can to deal with what has
taken place or will
take place and live with it.
> kate
> GRRRRRRRRRRrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr . . .
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>>
>> Harv
d'huit - 03 Sep 2005 03:55 GMT
>> uh hunh. yeppers, the city's protection sure did fail, harv. wonder
>> where the rebumlingcans put that 20 billion dollars, to strengthen the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> The condition of those dikes and the fact that the gov. did not call the
> guard in right away is there fault and time will prove that to even you.
<smile>
> i
>> mean, local "dems" had all the resources they needed, to contend with the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> No,,, they did not but it was the dikes failing that caused all of that.
<smile> yep. it sure did.
> heck yeah, and that's pretty apparent, isn't it? and
>> lousianna's nation guard was right handy for them to avail themselves of
>> in this time of dire need, wasn't it harv?
>
> That is up to the gov. of the state and not the Federal gov. but you
> surely know that.
<smile>
> oh, that's right, most of them are
>> in iraq and afganistan. the "dems" musta forgot that.
>
> That is political bull sh.t and you know it.
<smile> so's the fact that a lot of their essential and necessary national
guard equipment was not in the state, i suppose. hmmm . . . and not in the
country, either.
> guess louisianna's
>> "dems" shoulda drafted their own army before katrina hit. gee, and how
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Are you making some kind of point or talking high school politics.
<smile>
>> my point is---QUIT politizing this, harv.
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> You can not substitute personal abuse with your words for clear headed
> thinking.
<smile> hey, you do that all the time. why aren't i entitled to do so,
too? oh, i forgot, only rebumlingcans are allowed to.
>> i applaud texas, and all of the surrounding states, for the generosity of
>> spirit they've demonstrated to the victims of colossal national disaster
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> take personal
> responsibility for as much of their life as they can.
<smile> no, i wasn't. i was telling you that i wouldn't have even
remembered my survival kit, in the face of that kind of disaster. i frankly
know i wouldn't have remembered it.
Everyone should of
> got the hell out just
> like the mayor said but there was no plan for the people that could not.
<yep>
> That can not be
> changed now,,,,,,, all of us will do the best we can to deal with what has
> taken place or will
> take place and live with it.
<yep>
>> kate
>> GRRRRRRRRRRrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr . . .
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>>>
>>> Harv
Rosemarie Shiver - 03 Sep 2005 16:12 GMT
I didn't wanna go there...but I'm glad you did, Kate.
d'huit Hugs from Rosie

Signature
"If you wanna get it done, you gotta fight for yourself." -- Meat Loaf, Bat
Outta Hell II
>
> >> uh hunh. yeppers, the city's protection sure did fail, harv. wonder
[quoted text clipped - 112 lines]
> >>>
> >>> Harv
MikesBrain - 03 Sep 2005 10:58 GMT
2005-09-03, Responding to Harvey R. Stone...
[...]
> Like Rosie,,,, you can not see that the average person
> should be as ready as they can to face every type of
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> the mayor said but there was no plan for the people that
> could not.
This argument appears to be based on two differing views.
One appears to be saying that people who live in risky
places should at least have made basic preparations for
predictable and inevitable emergencies, and not just expect
"The Guvmint" to have done everything to provide them with a
"Click here to escape" solution delivered to their door in a
pretty parcel.
Sounds like common sense to me.
The other seems to be saying that amongst the preparations,
collective work such as upgrading a levee, ensuring
permanent availability of disaster-management/recovery
facilities etc. should have been put in place by now, but
have been prevented by Gov.Corp fund-raiding for other
"business plans".
Also seem to be the case.
But these are two different subjects IMO.
How about splitting the thread?
My best wishes to all in peril at this time.
My admiration to those actually doing something.
My condemnation to those who stole the levee that should
have been, whoever and wherever they are, and those who
contributed to screwing our enviromnent till it screams,
like it just did, again.
I hereby forgo my 2cents.
Note: I would imagine a number of people actually chose to
stay to avoid possible workcamps with armed guards.
Paranoid? Dig back in history a little.

Signature
----
* Another squeaking wheel @ http://tinyurl.com/6bf56
* Mike's (curious) Brain @ http://tinyurl.com/4872c
- Have a nice day, it really does do you good! :)