Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Arthritis / June 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

switching biologics and question re: new RD

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Alison DeLorme - 15 Jun 2005 20:21 GMT
Hi all... it's been a while since I've posted. Life just passes by
sometimes! But I'm having some trouble and hoping everyone can help. I am on
enbrel and mtx. Doing pretty well. Just weaned off of pred. I moved to NC so
I have a new RD now and she is very aggessive with treatment. She feels that
any inflammation should be dealt with.  I have mild swelling in my hands and
one ankle consistently. No medications to date have been able to resolve
these two problem areas. MY previous RD felt this was an ok trade off as I
am very happy with my ability to do what I can and satisfied with my
treatment.  But the new RD feels that I'm settling for less than I should
be.  She feels that with the new drugs out there, most folks can be free of
inflammation.  Now, I have had JRA for more than 30 years and I threw away
those rose colored glasses a long time ago. I've increased my mtx from 15 to
17.5, which helped me get off the pred. She just upped it to 20, which is
causing more of the side effects (nausea, mouth sores, and fatigue - I'm on
the injectable already and she has me on leucovorin. had been on 5mg folic
acid). I see her again in 2 mths and if those two problem areas aren't
better, she wants to switch the enbrel to either remicade or humira. My
previous RD felt that the humira wouldn't have offered much of a difference
for me and we didn't go the remicade route b/c I have three young children
(dh and I split child care time) and a demanding work schedule - basically
meaning that it will be very hard to schedule the 3+ hour infusion appts,
even if they are 8 weeks apart.

SO -   my two questions are:
1. Am I settling? Are there really people out there who are absolutely
inflammation free? with the new biologics? - I want to stress that I'm doing
pretty well. Yes, I have a bit of pain but I can do most things in my daily
life, including taking care of 4.5yr old twins and a 2 yr old.

2. for those who have switched between biologics, have you noticed marked
improvement? was the switch worth it?

ok, one last one: for those on remicade - has it been hard scheduling or
dealing with the long infusions?

thanks!!!     alison
Melissa - 15 Jun 2005 20:45 GMT
In article <_c%re.2293$td.916526@twister.southeast.rr.com>,
I am inflammation free with Enbrel...the down side is I can't stay infection
free. I have a almost 3 year old daughter I can keep up with pretty well when
I'm not flaring. If mtx is holding you well and you don't want to add a med
then I would stick with mtx. For me enbrel was a lifesaver I felt immediately
well (as well as a person with RA can feel). And boy do I know what you mean
about scheduling remicade with small children...I'm trying to figure that out
myself and I only have one.

As for switching biologicals well I'll be able to tell you that at the end of
the month when I start remicade..

melissa

alisonamsb@nc.rr.com says...

>>SO -   my two questions are:
>1. Am I settling? Are there really people out there who are absolutely
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>thanks!!!     alison
Smokie Darling (Annie) - 15 Jun 2005 21:49 GMT
> Hi all... it's been a while since I've posted. Life just passes by
> sometimes! But I'm having some trouble and hoping everyone can help. I am on
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> pretty well. Yes, I have a bit of pain but I can do most things in my daily
> life, including taking care of 4.5yr old twins and a 2 yr old.

That's hard to say.  Could be that this is as good as it gets for you,
or there "may" be something better.  Only you know for certain, and
maybe you won't until you try something else.

> 2. for those who have switched between biologics, have you noticed marked
> improvement? was the switch worth it?

When I switched from Arava to Remicade (2000), the improvement was
shocking.  I went from barely being able to walk to being able to run
across a parking lot.  However, after 2.5 years I "reacted" to
Remicade.  Doesn't happen to everyone, but seems that it is more common
with Remicade than other drugs (usually if you don't react the first
couple of time you won't ever react).  You may need to take an
anti-histamine (i.e., Claritin, I was on Atarax).

> ok, one last one: for those on remicade - has it been hard scheduling or
> dealing with the long infusions?

I enjoyed the 2.5 to 3 hours for the infusion.  It was very relaxing to
me, of course at the time I worked for Human Services (food benefit and
medical eligibility), so any "down" time was greatly appreciated.

> thanks!!!     alison

Smokie Darling (Annie)
Alison DeLorme - 15 Jun 2005 23:36 GMT
>>>When I switched from Arava to Remicade (2000), the improvement was
shocking. <<<

Thanks for the reply... I would think this would be natural to have a big
improvement since the biologics are much better than the simple dmards like
arava. But since I'm already on a biologic (enbrel), I wasn't sure if I'd
see much more of an improvement. From what I've read and heard in the past,
the biologics are so specifically made that they basically mirror each other
in terms of how they work. The traditional dmards have a wide variance of
effectiveness person to person...

alison
Smokie Darling (Annie) - 16 Jun 2005 03:10 GMT
> >>>When I switched from Arava to Remicade (2000), the improvement was
> shocking. <<<
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> alison

Well, Remicade worked wonders and Enbrel (touch wood) seems to be doing
equally as well.  Humira never helped me.  In fact Humira seemed to
make my RA worse, including quite possibly the worst RA flares I have
ever experienced.  I was on it for about 4 months before I started
manifesting neurological problems and was taken off of it.

Found out later that the phone calls to the doctor's office had never
been given to him, only a nurse.  I should have been taken off after I
started showing a second side effect.  I still have some balance and
cognitive issues that are almost directly attributable to my adverse
reaction to Humira.

Here's hoping that you do well on Humira.  So far as I know, I am the
only person I know of who had the reactions I've had to Humira.

Smokie Darling (Annie)< <allergic to the weirdest stuff
Diane - 15 Jun 2005 23:06 GMT
hi alison,
i'm with you, girlfriend. i'm on arava and a large dose of remicade and
still have lots of infalmmation. yet i'm very happy about all i can do
i could not do before. my doc pushes for a better and better response,
but i've come to believe it's just not going to happen for me.
on the other hand, if you haven't tried the biologics, i think you owe
it to yourself to do so. you might be one of the people who get
complete relief with them. . .and you won't know until you try it.

good luck,

diane
Alison DeLorme - 17 Jun 2005 05:28 GMT
That's where I am right now... I just don't like messing with a good thing
and I do think I'm doing well now... I am always afraid I'm going to go from
one drug to the next looking for something better and not getting it.  what
happens if the drugs no longer work for me? What do I do then? Right now, at
least I'd have two other meds to try out... BTW, I'm already on enbrel. And
I think I'm doing fine but the dr thinks it could be better, hence the talk
about the other two biologics. been on enbrel since 2001, with a 9month
break durng pregnancy. - alison

>>>my doc pushes for a better and better response,
but i've come to believe it's just not going to happen for me.
on the other hand, if you haven't tried the biologics, <<<
Duckie - 17 Jun 2005 03:31 GMT
My RD just added a dose of Rituxan to the Remicade and
Arava and pred I take. So far I have not noticed a
difference but he says it can take 3-4 months. The
rituxan is 4 doses delivered once a week for a month
and then not again for a year. Maybe that is the thing
to do -- to add one more rather than stop the one you
know is working for you. You might email your doctor to
look into the Rituxan as an addition to your present
mix. I am heading out of town for the moment [Portland
Gimpfest] but I am sure my RD would be happy to talk
with yours.
Duckie

> Hi all... it's been a while since I've posted. Life just passes by
> sometimes! But I'm having some trouble and hoping everyone can help. I am on
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> thanks!!!     alison

Signature

  _('>
 (_<_)

    _
  _('< -quack
 (_<_)

    _
 __('< *QUACK!*
<_{__)

  _('< "|,,|_"
 (_<_)

  _('< "AFLAC!"
 (_<_)

Alison DeLorme - 17 Jun 2005 05:30 GMT
I just read about this. I found it very interesting but didn't realize you
could be taking other heavy hitters with it. I will definitely bring this up
to my RD next visit. I found the research promising - I didn't think it was
FDA approved yet though? Thanks for sharing your experiences.  - alison

>>>My RD just added a dose of Rituxan to the Remicade and
Arava and pred I take. <<<
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.