Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Arthritis / June 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Grrrrrrrr...........darn hippa law!

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Newsgroup Spambuster - 07 Jun 2005 06:51 GMT
I understand the basic concepts behind the newer hippa law, but what I
guess I don't get and what really frustrates me to no end, is the way
the hippa law gets put into practice.

When in the hospital recently, the hospital wouldn't even tell our
pastor if I was there and what room I was in.   Now, my pastor knew I
was there, but trying to find me to pay me a visit was a whole nother
story for the poor guy.   He had to jump through all kinds of hoops to
find out what floor and room I was in.  Sometimes even family members
who call to check on you are told that they have no record of you.
Really, what purpose does this serve other than to frustrate people.   I
just don't get it!

The other thing that really bothers me is once you are out of the
hospital, following up with additional medical care can be almost
impossible because the doctors no longer send copies of what was done in
the hospital for you to your doctors and then the doctors don't have any
idea what went on and how to treat you or follow up with you!
Grrrrr............yes, you can get copies of your medical records from
the hospitals, but this often takes weeks to do, sometimes even months,
not to mention the fact that you have to sign your life away just to let
your other doctors know what took place and what needs to be followed up
on.  

Surely there has to be a better way of dealing with all of this!!!

Sorry, folks, I just needed to get that off my chest!!!

Donna G
Jo Firey - 07 Jun 2005 09:30 GMT
> I understand the basic concepts behind the newer hippa law, but what I
> guess I don't get and what really frustrates me to no end, is the way
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> Sorry, folks, I just needed to get that off my chest!!!

Here here.  My own doctor can';t really get involved when I'm in the
hospital useless he is the one who admitted me.  I have to rely for
aftercare on a surgeon who feels his job is done once he has cut.  And gets
frustrated if he has to deal with any sort of after care.

Course if worked out well last time.  Once I got out of the hospital my
surgeon was never available so I got to see the Nice good liking southern
gentleman surgeon for wound care and such.  He was sweet.  Mind you I'd
never let him near me with a scalpel.  But he does great follow-up.

Then I threw a clot in my shoulder.  Hospital fault for not maintaining a
line.  I don't really care.  Just want it better and to be able to relax is
peace and quiet for another week.  They even got me a new TV for I could
watch the NBA finals.  (And joined me in my room for the party).

Cause for a lawsuit makes them so sweet and nice.  Or at least they give the
ones who would like to be sweet and nice free rein.

there should be a book title  HIPPA in a small town.  Do they have a clue
what wives talk about at football games.  Secrets, we aint got no bloody
secrets.

Jo
Harvey R. Stone - 07 Jun 2005 12:54 GMT
> Grrrrr............yes, you can get copies of your medical records from
> the hospitals, but this often takes weeks to do, sometimes even months,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Sorry, folks, I just needed to get that off my chest!!!
> Donna G

Well said,,,,  It is a sign of the times.   I do not know what the answer is
but much the same can be seen in dealing with our schools and trying to get
a child an education.   0 degree tolerance  is a sign of incompetence and
the inability of higher ups to make decisions while controlling a situation.
   Just because laws are passed does not mean the outcome will be
improvement.   Hospitals, schools,,ect.
Harv
Smokie Darling (Annie) - 07 Jun 2005 14:08 GMT
> I understand the basic concepts behind the newer hippa law, but what I
> guess I don't get and what really frustrates me to no end, is the way
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> Donna G

Wow, and I always thought *my* town was the worst, for everything!  I
remember that when I was admitted, before I was given the "pre
anesthesia" shot (great party drug if it's a SHORT party), I was asked
to list who I would allow to know I was in hospital.  When I said
family, they asked for names, when I said friends, same thing.  In
fact, they were the ones who asked me if I wanted a priest to come see
me (the docs weren't sure I was going to survive the sepsis), and which
one.  The hospital even called my doctor to tell him I was going to
have emergency surgery, so he could be there when I woke up.

Perhaps you might suggest something like this to them?  I know our
hospital is networked, so after they put all the info into a laptop,
they then took it and attached it to the network and downloaded my
stuff (names, religion, allergies, food preferences) so that anyone
with patient access could read whatever portions pertained to them.

IOW, the receptionist would not know my religion (as s/he did not have
authorization for that screen), but s/he *could* see who all was
allowed information about me.

Smokie Darling (Annie)-who just realized when she stopped being
embarrassed by being naked in front of health care professional...
Jo Firey - 07 Jun 2005 18:01 GMT
> Smokie Darling (Annie)-who just realized when she stopped being
> embarrassed by being naked in front of health care professional...

One does reach that point.  Kind of fun in a way cause it makes some of them
a bit nervous.

Jo
Janet N - 08 Jun 2005 08:33 GMT
> Wow, and I always thought *my* town was the worst, for everything!  I
> remember that when I was admitted, before I was given the "pre
> anesthesia" shot (great party drug if it's a SHORT party), I was asked
> to list who I would allow to know I was in hospital.  When I said
> family, they asked for names, when I said friends, same thing.

I had to request this over twenty years ago.  I had a male visitor who
decided he needed to stay with me night and day.  I barely knew the guy.
Ended up giving them a list of who could know I was there and who couldn't.
Nearly backfired when friends travelled 500 miles to visit.  Also had
hospital security move my car to a different parking lot every day.

I guess I can see why they restrict information... I'd prefer it that way.
It can be pretty unnerving when someone can get all your location info.

Janet N.
Mike-UK - 08 Jun 2005 10:02 GMT
On Jun 8, Janet N posted:

> > Wow, and I always thought *my* town was the worst, for everything!  I
> > remember that when I was admitted, before I was given the "pre
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> I guess I can see why they restrict information... I'd prefer it that way.
> It can be pretty unnerving when someone can get all your location info.

New Ruling From U.S. Justice Dept. Limits Privacy-Violation
Prosecutions

An authoritative new ruling by the Justice Department
sharply limits the government's ability to prosecute people
for criminal violations of the law that protects the privacy
of medical records. In short, the department said, people
who work for an entity covered by the federal privacy law
are not automatically covered by that law and may not be
subject to its criminal penalties, which include a $250,000
fine and 10 years in prison for the most serious violations.

More @ http://www.privacy.org/

...may be of interest.

Signature

---------------------------
Another squeaking wheel @
http//tinyurl.com/6bf56

Mike's Brain @
http://tinyurl.com/4872c

Have a nice day, it really does do you good! :)
---------------------------

gickylynn . - 11 Jun 2005 01:26 GMT
HIPAA  is a good concept, but put in practice sucks

sure, it's there to protect patient's privacy, but it makes it
frustrating for the patient as well as the health care workers

our hospital is one bit network, so sharing info with our dr's is ok -
cuz when i was in, the su rgeon contacted my primary physician and
rheumatolgist for help with getting me back down from these high doses
of pred he had put me on

working in the health care field

hipaa for me has beennothing but a pain in the butt

but as a patient i'm glad they're working to protect my privacy
Jo Firey - 11 Jun 2005 03:50 GMT
> HIPAA  is a good concept, but put in practice sucks
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> but as a patient i'm glad they're working to protect my privacy

I just get the feeling that because it is a pain in the butt, too many in
the health care field are making it more difficult for the patient than it
has to be.  (With plenty of help from their lawyers who often seen to be
against any sharing of any information with anyone for any reason just as a
matter of principle.)

Jo
Duckie - 07 Jun 2005 22:36 GMT
That happened here at Lahey when it first started but
seemed to iron out a bit over the last two years. Guess
you need to have photo copies to take with you when you
are discharged from the hospital. Like refuse leave
unless you have them in your hot little hands.
Duckie

> I understand the basic concepts behind the newer hippa law, but what I
> guess I don't get and what really frustrates me to no end, is the way
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> Donna G

Signature

  _('>
 (_<_)

    _
  _('< -quack
 (_<_)

    _
 __('< *QUACK!*
<_{__)

  _('< "|,,|_"
 (_<_)

  _('< "AFLAC!"
 (_<_)

Nann Bell - 08 Jun 2005 05:40 GMT
((((((Donna)))))))  

It seems that they should have a release of info form you can sign at the
hospital asking that all records pertaining to your hospitalization be sent
to Dr so-and-so.  If they don't, send them a letter suggesting it!

As for your pastor, in Alpena area pastors register through the volunteer
office and get hospital IDs that identify them as clergy.  This allows them
to get a patient's room number from the info desk downstairs.  If I go in and
ask, they won't tell me, but they will tell Mike with his ID badge.  
(Needless to say, his badge lives in the glove compartment of his car!)

As an aside, they are no longer allowed to say anyone's name on any emergency
calls.  Taht doesn't matter in larger areas, but around here it is a source
of great frustration.  Our emergency personnel in this county are all
good-hearted volunteers, most of whom have had family here going back
generations.  They can all locate "John Doe's house" much faster then "555 W
Fifth Street".  Even if you tell them when you call to use your name, they
are no allowed to do so.  Blanket legislation isn't always the best solution.

Signature

Nann
remove the Gator cheer to email me
Simply the thing I am shall make me live --- William Shakespeare

PattyDFX1 - 08 Jun 2005 14:38 GMT
DonnaG wrote: following up with additional medical care can be almost
impossible because the doctors no longer send copies of what was done
in
the hospital for you to your doctors and then the doctors don't have
any
idea what went on and how to treat you

  I've learned just how nuts this is firsthand. Jeff was in the
hospital (diabetic coma) from November 2nd to 7th. Because they screwed
up his bipolar meds so badly, his psychiatrist requested a Depakote
level on November 3rd. She called in the order and followed it up in
writing. Jeff also signed a paper giving permission for her to speak to
all his doctors and have access to all of his records. After about a
million phone calls and finally threats of a lawsuit, we FINALLY
received his lab results last week! Ridiculous! Our privacy should be
protected, but, this is going too far <sigh>.
--
Hugs, Patty
Hoping your hills are never too steep.
d'huit - 08 Jun 2005 15:43 GMT
> I understand the basic concepts behind the newer hippa law, but what I
> guess I don't get and what really frustrates me to no end, is the way
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> Donna G

actually, i'm glad you got that off your chest.  (((((((donnag))))))

what you describe really doesn't make sense.  it seems very inefficient to
me.  i would think it makes integrating/coordinating care and/or treatments
between specialties, to benefit the patient, more difficult and could also
cause missed medical options/opportunities (for want of a better word).

there are a lot of hospitalized patients who are far too ill, temporarily,
and who don't have a mate or an advocate to be a legal voice for them (might
not have been able to afford to create the document that appoints somebody,
or might not even have known such a document can be necessary)---to list who
may or may not need to know, or need to have access to the patient's
records, or access more general information about the patient's condition,
or visiting access.

what of the person living alone who calls 911, just before they lapse into
some suddenly unconscious state, like a diabetic coma or an altered state
from a stroke or some such thing? too ill to point out or locate a purse or
wallet, containing a list of whom to notify? what if they were too ill to
sign the hippa document (or obviously, any other ER documents)?  --does
hippa automatically apply?  does hippa apply to EMTs as well?  so, does that
mean that nobody will be informed of this person's plight?

i know that when i had those two epidural series done by the same doctor, i
thought it was really strange to have to sign the same hippa form for each
of the injection procedures in the same epidural series (3 times for each
series, in other words).  talk about wasting paper, time and money---it felt
unnecessarily redundant to me.

boy, thinking about it--- i'm glad hippa wasn't in force when butch's life
and death struggle began.  towards the end of his life, which is also when i
had double pneumonia, i truthfully didn't have any mindshare left to focus
on that kind of thing---who should or shouldn't have access to him or his
records (each and every time he entered the hospital, i mean).  i was
already on overload at every level.  i can only imagine what it must be like
for a patient who is utterly overwhelmed by his or her confusing and
difficult situation to have to deal with this, too.

i agree with you, donnag.  there has to be a better way and it shouldn't
have to be the patient's responsibility in all cases.  some laws are very
dumb laws, because they are slap-dashed together with shortsightedness.

kate
Don W - 08 Jun 2005 12:12 GMT
Lucky here I guess.  Kansas City Medical Center (KU Med) issues  you a
slip with your secret number, whether you are in the hospital as an
in-patient or there as an outpatient receiving treatment.  You may give
that secret number to anyone you want to share your medical condition
with while you are there.  As I have moved through the system doing
tests they have always kept track of my wife and made certain that we
end up at the same place after they have wheeled me down the hall to
heaven knows where for the next test.

My Doctors there have access to all my medical records, tests, x-rays,
MRI's, CT scans, etc. They can all stay on the same page and know what
is happening with me.  Cleveland Clinic in Cleveland Ohio had an even
better similar system which I always marveled at when I was shipped off
for test by a doctor with a five inch thick folder on all my tests etc.,
including Doctor's notes for the past year and sometimes a packet of
x-Ray films I could not carry and requested transportation to deliver it
to the next place I was bound for.  I loved to confound the nurses and
Doctors as I insisted on sitting there reading through the folder.

My cancer doctor at KU Med handed me a form to fill out which allowed me
to select five  KU Med doctors  I  wish to have  updated reports on his
treatments etc. for me.  I will be anxious to see how well it works.

Don Whitely

>>I understand the basic concepts behind the newer hippa law, but what I
>>guess I don't get and what really frustrates me to no end, is the way
[quoted text clipped - 69 lines]
>
> kate
Gwen Love - 08 Jun 2005 18:55 GMT
The last two times I was admitted to the hospital I was asked if I wanted
people to know I was there if someone called.  I said Yes. Something like
that can take care of the problem, seems to me.
Gwen

> > I understand the basic concepts behind the newer hippa law, but what I
> > guess I don't get and what really frustrates me to no end, is the way
[quoted text clipped - 69 lines]
>
> kate
Jo Firey - 08 Jun 2005 20:53 GMT
> The last two times I was admitted to the hospital I was asked if I wanted
> people to know I was there if someone called.  I said Yes. Something like
> that can take care of the problem, seems to me.
> Gwen

It can take care of the problem, and it should take care of the problem.
Only far too often it doesn't.  I've come to believe that what I call over
adherence to the HIPPA law is often a way for medical entities to more of
less throw a tantrum at a law they resent and disagree with.  Kind of an
"I'll show you and your darn law:"  kind of thing.    I also believe from a
legal point of view they use it as an excuse to keep how and why you were
treated "private" even from you.  It makes it very difficult to establish
and prosecute a malpractice claim.

Jo
Mike-UK - 09 Jun 2005 00:06 GMT
On Jun 8, Jo Firey posted:

> > The last two times I was admitted to the hospital I was asked if I wanted
> > people to know I was there if someone called.  I said Yes. Something like
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> treated "private" even from you.  It makes it very difficult to establish
> and prosecute a malpractice claim.

So where are we in the "problem-reaction-solution" scam?

Problem established.

Reaction established.

The solution? Follow the money and join the dots people...

(Ooh! All that lovely data! If only we could actually use it!)

"Won't somebody please think of the children! Shriek!"

Signature

---------------------------
Another squeaking wheel @
http//tinyurl.com/6bf56

Mike's Brain @
http://tinyurl.com/4872c

Have a nice day, it really does do you good! :)
---------------------------

Newsgroup Spambuster - 09 Jun 2005 04:27 GMT
Thanks everyone for your responses!

As far as being asked, I never was asked and when you are by yourself
and having a very difficult time talking, it can be most frustrating to
get certain concerns across.  I did get an evaluation form from the
hospital and did not hold back on my feelings at all as far as some of
the things that took place and my frustrations with their lack of
communication to my other doctors, especially my pcp.   Will be
interesting to see if that gets their attention at all or not.

The other problem for me is, that I use one hospital and its physicians
for all my health care  except for the lung stuff.   Because my lung
issues are rather complicated, I use the other hospial in town primarily
for my lung stuff.   So, getting information from the one hospital to my
other doctors at the other hospital makes things all the more difficult
to contend with.   It literally can take months for this to happen.
At least when I have something done at the facilities where all my other
doctors are, they are all tied into the same computer system so they can
just pull up results of anything I have had done.

As much as I hate this new hippa law stuff and think it has really
caused more problems than it has solved, I am not one to just roll over
and let things go.   I will continue to work on this process and to work
with the doctors and hospitals to hopefully help them learn to be more
patient friendly and more user friendly as a whole.     Who knows, it
could actually happen!  ;  )

Donna G
Nann Bell - 10 Jun 2005 15:33 GMT
> As much as I hate this new hippa law stuff and think it has really
> caused more problems than it has solved, I am not one to just roll over
> and let things go.   I will continue to work on this process and to work
> with the doctors and hospitals to hopefully help them learn to be more
> patient friendly and more user friendly as a whole.     Who knows, it
> could actually happen!  ;  )

heehee, keep us posted and remind me to stay on your good side!

Signature

Nann
remove the Gator cheer to email me
Simply the thing I am shall make me live --- William Shakespeare

debbie m. - 08 Jun 2005 23:48 GMT
Hi Donna,

Its good to see you posting.  I hope you are feeling much better.  On
the other hand i've been in doctors office where they yell out your
full name.  How about that for hippa laws.  lOL

debbie m.

> I understand the basic concepts behind the newer hippa law, but what I
> guess I don't get and what really frustrates me to no end, is the way
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> Donna G
Jim McGowan - 14 Jun 2005 08:29 GMT
Ahh...  My latest Hipaa peeves:

My mother, who up till then was living by herself, cooking, driving, etc,
felt dizzy and was taken to an ER and admitted. Dr. ordered heavy duty
steroids cause he thought it was likely to be lack of O2 - breathing
difficulties. She then got downright weird in the hospital: cursing,
paranoia, going to the bathroom in the hallway. No one would tell my
brother, sister, or I what was going on - Hipaa!  Four weeks later after ins
and outs of rehab, nursing home, and assisted living, she passed away.  We
found out she was terminal the day before. Liver failed - cirrhotic.
Non-drinker all her life. It happens.  But we found out that they knew this
the second day in the hospital, but it was up to her to tell us - Hipaa! And
her strange sudden psychotic episodes were found to be steroid-induced. So
she was not in a clear state of mind to tell us - she had no idea - and my
sis had durable power of atorney for merdical decisions, but that doesn't
come into play unless they declare her incompetent. Whch they didn't, cause
those docs didn't know about the steroid-induced psychosis - Hipaa. A truly
sad state of affairs.  What a mess.

And when I had to be admitted a year later, I insisted on listing all people
who were allowed to know all my medical issues. I made it a long list -
wife, children, aunts, uncles, and - yes - my voice mail! They said no, and
I said, "See ya." Wouldn't let them get started till they attached that to
my chart and gave my wife a signed receipt accepting the list as Hipaa
compliant.

Lastly, I loved dealing with the miserable lady who works at the local MRI
facility. She tried to have me sign a form saying I have received and read
and agree to their Hipaa policy. But, I said, where is it? You didn't give
me one! She looked at me with a pure hate in her eyes and told me "No one
reads them - just sign the form!".  OK, I decided to have some fun. I
insisted she give me a form to read. She couldn't find any. They're a part
of the hospital consortium in my area, so I called a friend in medical
records at one of the hospitals and she had their Hipaa director (they
actually have one of those?!) drive a box of them over, give me one, and
then give the box, and a little "training", to the lady behind the counter!
Fun to watch. To top it off, I insisted on the same long list of friends and
relatives who are allowed to receive medical info on me. I think she may
have quit.....  :-)

Signature

Jim McGowan

> I understand the basic concepts behind the newer hippa law, but what I
> guess I don't get and what really frustrates me to no end, is the way
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> Donna G
Joan Carter - 14 Jun 2005 15:37 GMT
>She looked at me with a pure hate in her eyes and told me "No one
>reads them - just sign the form!".  OK, I decided to have some fun. I
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>relatives who are allowed to receive medical info on me. I think she may
>have quit.....  :-)

Oh, Jim, that was terrible about your mother, but I did laugh at the part about
the "lady" ?? who gave you such a hard time.

I don't think those types ever quit, they just stay on and get nastier. But if
you visit her again, she may give it serious second thought and write out her
resignation.

---
Joan
d'huit - 14 Jun 2005 17:16 GMT
ROTFL!  i can just see it on her next job appl. - reason for leaving prior
employer:

jim mcgowan and his federally sanctioned harrassment via HIPPA regulations.

good for you, jim!

kate

> On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 03:29:03 -0400, "Jim McGowan"
> <jcmcgowanATcomcastDOTnet>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>>relatives who are allowed to receive medical info on me. I think she may
>>have quit.....  :-)

<gentle snip> . . . I did laugh at the part about
> the "lady" ?? who gave you such a hard time.
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> ---
> Joan
Joan Carter - 14 Jun 2005 18:34 GMT
>jim mcgowan and his federally sanctioned harrassment via HIPPA regulations.

I have to ask what HIPPA is.
---
Joan
d'huit - 14 Jun 2005 21:29 GMT
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 09:16:53 -0700, "d'huit" <threecedars@comcast.net>
> wrote in
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> ---
> Joan

LOL! and not at you, joan, but at me trying to explain it.   it's actually
HIPAA, but we all mess the anagram up.  here's a link for a brief
explanation:
http://www.hipaaplus.com/abouthippa.htm

kate
d'huit - 14 Jun 2005 17:19 GMT
i'm sorry about your mom's death, jim and all that horrible confusion
surrounding it.  that's awful.  it's hard enough to lose a loved one without
redtape making the process more difficult.

kate

> Ahh...  My latest Hipaa peeves:
>
[quoted text clipped - 66 lines]
>>
>> Donna G
Jim McGowan - 15 Jun 2005 06:29 GMT
Yeah, it was a true revelation about the state of how our health care system
can be thrown into a bit of chaos by a well-intentioned, but very difficult
to implement, law.

Sad part is I couldn't even go and confront anyone about it.  Some of the
inside info was told to me by a very nice intern (or resident - not sure
which) whose job was very much placed on the line by telling me what he did.
I couldn't bring myself to blow any whistles at his expense.  Also, my
personal physician, when I told him about this, had one of his office staff
pull up all of the chart information and test reports for my Mom, and print
them out to give to me.  He was really upset by it and wanted me to know
just what happened; but then the staffer told him and I that her name and ID
were logged while pulling all the data and they had called to ask her why
she was doing that.  Apparently since my Mom was never a patient at their
office it's technically illegal to do what she, at my doc's orders, did.  So
again, I could not bring myself to go on a witch hunt and ruin people who
helped me to the truth.  Wouldn't have helped my Mom any by then.

I did, however, lay down a few strongly worded hints - by way of my brother,
who lives in another town and has never been to my Doc's office - so that
they knew that we knew.  Also kept in contact with the hospital asking about
their disjointed implementation of HIPAA.  Can't tell, but I'm hoping that
it made them look hard at their protocols. I don't want this to happen to
anyone else.

Signature

Jim McGowan

> i'm sorry about your mom's death, jim and all that horrible confusion
> surrounding it.  that's awful.  it's hard enough to lose a loved one
[quoted text clipped - 72 lines]
>>>
>>> Donna G
d'huit - 15 Jun 2005 15:11 GMT
> Yeah, it was a true revelation about the state of how our health care
> system can be thrown into a bit of chaos by a well-intentioned, but very
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> I'm hoping that it made them look hard at their protocols. I don't want
> this to happen to anyone else.

you're right.  nobody should have to experience what you and your family
went through, jim.  this is very sad and all the coulda's/
shoulda's/woulda's, after the fact, can't undo what occurred.

in my perception, there's a nobility of spirit that rises to the surface in
many people, like you jim, who have endured the aftermath forced upon them
by the actions of others and the chain of events leading up to it, that many
of us would find unforgivable and ennervating.  your efforts in delicately
(to protect some people) trying to get the hospital to review their hipaa
implimentation protocols, so that others do not have to fall victim to the
same flawed policies, falls into that catagory of nobility of spirit, as
does those whose efforts dared to help you piece together an explanation.

in too many situations of this particular nature, the hiding behind hippa,
stonewalling, caginess and obvious c.y.o.a.-ing, by the institution
involved, is reprehensible in the face of a family's loss.  hospitals do
these things, because they know they were, or something they're doing, is
wrong.  it was wrong that your family had to endure what it did.  it is also
equally wrong that your family is being deliberately denied, directly by the
hospital involved, the details necessary to help you understand why this
experience unfolded, as it did, to cause the experience to be forced upon
you.  all of you deserved no less than complete disclosure to help you
understand and cope with what occurred and to simplify your grief and
grieving processes.  common decency requires no less than this--an honest
explanation by the hospital.

hipaa, though well-intentioned, would not be difficult to impliment if in
its origination process the legislation's implimentation guidelines had been
more thoughtfully considered, and written with foresight and clarity.
lacking those guidelines, its good intentions fall short and do  disservice
to many.

my heart goes out to you and your family, jim.

kate

>> i'm sorry about your mom's death, jim and all that horrible confusion
>> surrounding it.  that's awful.  it's hard enough to lose a loved one
[quoted text clipped - 77 lines]
>>>>
>>>> Donna G
jb - 19 Jun 2005 08:34 GMT
Jim
you are in my thoughts and prayers.
you sure have been through a lot
janice

| Yeah, it was a true revelation about the state of how our health care system
| can be thrown into a bit of chaos by a well-intentioned, but very difficult
[quoted text clipped - 97 lines]
| >>>
| >>> Donna G
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.