Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Arthritis / April 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

hearing problem

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Pope Pie \(Sy Lehrman\) - 05 Apr 2005 02:45 GMT
I have been taking chloroquin (I forget the full name at the moment) for
which there is a warning of rare hearing problems.  I recently ran headlong
into that dreaded midwestern mallady what's-going-around and was seized with
coughing for two weeks.  In the course of this agony of coughing, fever,
congestion, and general malaise I a) swallowed a crown, b) got a call that I
should leave off diclofenac, and c) got an ear ache.  I woke up one moring
to find that my congested left ear had gone silent and it promptly became
painful.  Anyway, after a series of events I have to see the
otolaryngologist tomorrow who will, I am told, probably be able to correct
the deafness sugically (gulp).  I am also told that I have mild to moderate
hearing loss in both ears aside from the silence in the left.

What I want to know, if anyone has any idea, is there any way to connect the
hearing loss to the medication?  Is there some characteristic of the rare
drug connection that might tell the tale?
Duckie - 05 Apr 2005 04:47 GMT
I've got not guesses short of maybe an ear infection
that they think require tubes. Someone just had those
put in -- Sarah I think. So surgery but not so scary.
Keep us posted on what the ear guy says tomorrow.
Duckie

Pope Pie (Sy Lehrman) wrote:

> I have been taking chloroquin (I forget the full name at the moment) for
> which there is a warning of rare hearing problems.  I recently ran headlong
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> hearing loss to the medication?  Is there some characteristic of the rare
> drug connection that might tell the tale?

Signature

  _('>
 (_<_)

    _
  _('< -quack
 (_<_)

    _
 __('< *QUACK!*
<_{__)

  _('< "|,,|_"
 (_<_)

  _('< "AFLAC!"
 (_<_)

Walt Hanks - 05 Apr 2005 10:15 GMT
> Pope Pie (Sy Lehrman) wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>> hearing loss to the medication?  Is there some characteristic of the rare
>> drug connection that might tell the tale?

Ototoxic drugs do have unique types of losses.  If you will get me the full
name of the drug and the dose you're taking, I'll ask my wife to get you a
description of the typical case.  But it isn't always possible to determine
the cause of a loss as most people have multiple reasons for their hearing
loss.  A mix of noise exposure, disease, trauma, and infection is very
common.

As far as PE tubes, you will probably feel relief from the fullness and pain
immediately and that will more than outweigh the temporary discomfort of the
procedure.

Walt Hanks
Jo Firey - 05 Apr 2005 17:00 GMT
>> Pope Pie (Sy Lehrman) wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>
> Walt Hanks

And that reminds me of why many of us never know the single reason for our
hearing loss.  Why really doesn't matter to the doctors.  Not that they
don't care.  But other than some early sudden hearing loss that can be
reversed with prednisone it just doesn't alter the course of treatment.
Usually any hearing that is gone, is gone.  You have to be extra careful
with what ever is left.

Doctors just don't have any reason to focus on things that don't affect
outcome.

Jo
Pope Pie \(Sy Lehrman\) - 06 Apr 2005 02:50 GMT
> Ototoxic drugs do have unique types of losses.  If you will get me the full
> name of the drug and the dose you're taking, I'll ask my wife to get you a
> description of the typical case.  But it isn't always possible to determine
> the cause of a loss as most people have multiple reasons for their hearing
> loss.  A mix of noise exposure, disease, trauma, and infection is very
> common.

The ENT guy says that the typical hearing problem from the drugs I am taking
(or in the case of diclofenac was recently taking) is ringing or buzzing in
the ear.
Walt Hanks - 06 Apr 2005 10:37 GMT
>> Ototoxic drugs do have unique types of losses.  If you will get me the
> full
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> in
> the ear.

Sy, my wife is a professor of Audiology.  Audiologists are the specialists
in hearing.

Ringing in the ears is a symptom common to NSAID ototoxicity, but the damage
can be severe and permanent.  The chloroquins are not NSAIDs.  The good news
is though, that the hearing loss associated with this class of drugs is
usually temporary.  However, with both NSAIDs and the Chloroquins, the
hearing loss is an early indicator of potential CNS damage.  In most cases,
the drugs should be stopped.

Once the infection has cleared, have yourself retested by an audiologist,
not a nurse or a physician.  Then you will know what is left and what can be
done to help.

Walt
Newsgroup Spambuster - 06 Apr 2005 23:07 GMT
Walt,

Can the hearing tests tell whether hearing loss is reversible or not?
Can they help tell what the cause is?  Just curious!

Donna G
Walt Hanks - 07 Apr 2005 02:13 GMT
> Walt,
>
> Can the hearing tests tell whether hearing loss is reversible or not?
> Can they help tell what the cause is?  Just curious!
>
> Donna G

In some limited cases, yes to both.  If a loss is conductive, that is,
caused by a mechanical problem in the ear, it may be reversible.  Testing
can determine if the loss is conductive.  It can also, in some cases,
determine if the loss is noise induced, or caused by a single trauma.  But
remember that most people experience mixed losses; that is, losses from
multiple causes.

Losses associated with specific ototoxic drugs have distinct patterns.
Again, if caught early, these losses can sometimes be reversed, depending
upon the drug in question.

And finally, any sudden onset loss is a medical emergency.  That is, a loss
that just shows up with no warning.  These can be caused by a virus, a
tumor, a ballooning blood vessel about to rupture, a stroke, etc....  These
are also sometimes reversible if caught early - as in within hours of onset.

But best of all, virtually any type of loss can be aided to some degree.
The old saw about "nerve deafness" being unaidable has not been true for
decades.  But anyone with a hearing loss needs to go to an audiologist, not
just a hearing aid dealer.  An audiologist will have atleast a Master's
degree and the initials "CCC-A" after their name.

Unless the loss is sudden onset, it is not necessary to see a physician
first.  The audiologist can tell you if medical consultation is needed.

Walt
Jo Firey - 05 Apr 2005 05:40 GMT
>I have been taking chloroquin (I forget the full name at the moment) for
> which there is a warning of rare hearing problems.  I recently ran
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> hearing loss to the medication?  Is there some characteristic of the rare
> drug connection that might tell the tale?

To me one of the more frustrating things about hearing loss, is that while
they can usually give you a whole list of things that might have caused it,
they can seldom tell you the one thing that did cause it in your particular
case.

I'm now profoundly deaf in my right ear, and still do not know it this was
caused by drugs, (my bet is the massive doses of theophyllin I've taken over
many years)  or if it is autoimmune or disease, age, or inherited.

For the record, if the doctor wants to put tubes in your ear(s) it is not
nearly as unpleasant a procedure as you might imagine.  I used to think that
was a barbaric thing to do to kids till I had one put in my left ear and
found it was no big deal.  Plus the ear quit hurting.  A very good thing.

Praying for easy and prompt recovery

Jo
Pope Pie \(Sy Lehrman\) - 06 Apr 2005 02:47 GMT
> For the record, if the doctor wants to put tubes in your ear(s) it is not
> nearly as unpleasant a procedure as you might imagine.  I used to think that
> was a barbaric thing to do to kids till I had one put in my left ear and
> found it was no big deal.  Plus the ear quit hurting.  A very good thing.

Thanks,
The ENT guy wants to try antibiotics on the theory that something must be
infecting the ear just because it's connected to the recently congested nose
which is uwuall full of all kinds of nasty thngs.  If that doesn't work he
suggests a tube, which he says really doesn't hurt much, but I've been to
the dentist and I've heard THAT before.
Newsgroup Spambuster - 06 Apr 2005 03:07 GMT
Sy,

Having ear tubes placed, really is no big deal!   I have a tendency to
get a lot of ear infections, particularly in my right ear.   I have had
several sets of ear tubes placed in both ears, and trust me, it is not
painful and is usually very helpful in keeping the ears drainging
properly so they don't get infected so much.   The actual procedure
itself takes only about 15 minutes to half an hour and then you are sent
home.   You do have to be careful not to get a lot of water in the ear
once you have a tube put in and when the tubes are first put in, you may
experience a bit of humming or other type of noise in your ear, but this
usually disappears within a few days to a week or so.  Haveing the tubes
placed and keeping the buildup of fluid from accumalating in the ear
also tends to improve your hearing as well.    Sometimes if you have a
particularly stubborn infection, you may need both oral antibiotics as
well as ear drops that are both steroid and antibiotic combined.   Best
of luck to you!

Donna G
Cindy - 05 Apr 2005 13:34 GMT
My dx was sudden accute hearing loss....Nothing left in the right ear but a
constant Whoooosh...All the time 24/7...I really can't link it to a cold or
anything, although the doctors did finally say it could have possibly been a
virus...I was told that a round of steroids in the beginning might have
brought it back...My doctor kept treating me for an inner ear infection that
I don't think I ever had...
Sent me to an ENT who did hearing test and then sent me to the next in line
specialist...Who did another hearing test and MRI...
Found a tumor in my Right Cavernous Sinus..Which had nothing at all to do
with my hearing, but I am thankful that I lost my hearing, or the tumor
would have kept growing until it caused lots of damage to the nerves in my
face and eyes...

I am kind of like Jo...They really never gave me a reason..

Another reason..The Bell Pasley Nerve goes to the face and to the ear..When
My daughter had Mono...It attacked that nerve and instead of going into the
face, it went into the ear...She lost most of her earing in one ear...But
the good news was that with steroids and time her hearing came back...

Praying everything is resolved for you soon
Hugs Cindy
>I have been taking chloroquin (I forget the full name at the moment) for
> which there is a warning of rare hearing problems.  I recently ran
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> hearing loss to the medication?  Is there some characteristic of the rare
> drug connection that might tell the tale?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.