Note: A 0.3 reading mentioned would be borderline
dead. I suspect they meant a reading 0.03.
Woman Arrested After Drinking Three Glasses of
Listerine Pleads Guilty to Drunken Driving
01-26-2005 2:45 PM
ADRIAN, Mich. -- A woman arrested after failing a sobriety
test and telling police she drank three glasses of Listerine
has pleaded guilty to drunken driving.
Police said Carol A. Ries, 50, of Adrian entered guilty
pleas Jan. 20. to operating a car under the influence and
following too closely. Police suspected she had been
drinking alcohol after she rear-ended another vehicle at
red light on Jan. 9.
She passed one breathalyzer test, but failed another that
used different equipment. Police found a bottle of Listerine
in her car, and she told them she had had three glasses
earlier in the day. Her blood alcohol level was .3, more
than three times the legal limit, police said.
Prosecutors agreed to drop charges of having an open
intoxicant in the vehicle and not having insurance, Sgt.
Lynn Courington said Wednesday.
According to Listerine manufacturer Pfizer Inc.'s Web site,
original formula Listerine contains 26.9 percent alcohol,
more than four times that of many malt liquors. Other
varieties contain 21.6 percent alcohol.
No telephone listings for a Carol Ries in Adrian, about 75
miles southwest of Detroit, could be found, and the Lenawee
County District Court said she did not have a lawyer.
Ries, who does not have a history of drunken driving, could
face up to 93 days in jail and a $500 fine when she is
sentenced Feb. 11.
Gary Z - 27 Jan 2005 14:07 GMT
Hi Chief,
0.08 is legally drunk in Illinois. 0.10 in much of the nation which the
federal govt is trying to force to 0.08. The bowling alley owner last night
said 0.25 is alcohol poisoning and borderline dead for some. Tolerance
levels do come into play with alcohol. A guy next to me in the same
conversation said he blew a 0.26 when he had his DUI.
GaryZ
> Note: A 0.3 reading mentioned would be borderline
> dead. I suspect they meant a reading 0.03.
firechief - 27 Jan 2005 17:36 GMT
> The bowling alley owner last night said 0.25 is alcohol poisoning
> and borderline dead for some. Tolerance levels do come into play
> with alcohol.
Yep, that's why I stated 0.3 was considered "dead". But as you stated,
there are tolerance levels depending on weight, age, etc. etc.
Katrina - 30 Jan 2005 07:10 GMT
>> The bowling alley owner last night said 0.25 is alcohol poisoning
>> and borderline dead for some. Tolerance levels do come into play
>> with alcohol.
>
> Yep, that's why I stated 0.3 was considered "dead". But as you stated,
> there are tolerance levels depending on weight, age, etc. etc.
don't forget practice... those who drink regularly build up a tolerance to it.
Katrina
Don Kirkman - 28 Jan 2005 00:50 GMT
It seems to me I heard somewhere that Gary Z wrote in article
<ctasj5$gn5$1@usenet.cso.niu.edu>:
>Hi Chief,
>0.08 is legally drunk in Illinois. 0.10 in much of the nation which the
>federal govt is trying to force to 0.08. The bowling alley owner last night
>said 0.25 is alcohol poisoning and borderline dead for some. Tolerance
>levels do come into play with alcohol. A guy next to me in the same
>conversation said he blew a 0.26 when he had his DUI.
California went from 0.1 to 0.08 several years back, maybe a decade or
so. A rough rule of thumb is that one drink will equate to about 0.02%
in the blood one half to one hour later (it fades out over time unless
it's reinforced with more drinks).
I used to know these things when I loitered on the fringes of the
justice system, but time has a funny way of . . . .
>> Note: A 0.3 reading mentioned would be borderline
>> dead. I suspect they meant a reading 0.03.

Signature
Don
Old age is when you start saying "I wish I knew now what I knew then."
Cooly - 29 Jan 2005 23:22 GMT
> I used to know these things when I loitered on the fringes of the
> justice system, but time has a funny way of . . . .
"Loitered on the fringes ...." I don't think I've heard my early years
summed up so eloquently before Don.
Thanks,
Cooly