Did anyone else get this post? note date, just came 3 days ago, and last three
days get the sanE post.
Shirlawn
Subject: Note: The AOL Newsgroup service will be discontinued in early
2005.
From: BoardsAdmin@aol.com (BoardsAdmin)
Date: 6 Dec 2004 12:00:00 GMT
Please Note: The AOL Newsgroup service will be discontinued in early 2005.
For members using AOL over a dial-up connection, you will no longer be able to
access Newsgroups. If you have a separate high-speed connection, you can
contact your broadband provider to see if they offer Newsgroups. Newsgroup
services can often be accessed through a third party reader, such as Mozilla
Thunderbird (http://www.mozilla.org/projects/thunderbird/).
Alternatively, you can access Newsgroups via Google at
http://groups.google.com/.
We apologize for this inconvenience.
------------------- Headers --------------------
Path: tndist02!not-for-mail
From: BoardsAdmin@aol.com (BoardsAdmin)
Subject: Note: The AOL Newsgroup service will be discontinued in early 2005.
Date: 6 Dec 2004 12:00:00 GMT
Organization: AOL htp://www.aol.com
MessageId: <200412061200.0000001@ttttt.aol.com>
Diane - 21 Jan 2005 17:22 GMT
i did not get this email, shirlawn, however i have been unable to
reliably get asa through aol for the past two weeks and have been using
google groups, which i don't like but it's better than not being able
to get it at all. aol is really shooting itself in the foot. i guess it
may be time for me to leave it.
diane
Rosemarie Shiver - 21 Jan 2005 17:34 GMT
Try this one, Diane. Clicking 'arthritis' gets ASA :-)
http://www.talkaboutnetwork.com/
Hugs from Rosie

Signature
"If you wanna get it done, you gotta fight for yourself" -- Meat Loaf, Bat
Outta Hell II
> i did not get this email, shirlawn, however i have been unable to
> reliably get asa through aol for the past two weeks and have been using
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> diane
AChrist787 - 21 Jan 2005 19:51 GMT
Shirlawn, where did this message come from? I haven't gotten anything at all
from AOL and haven't seen this before either.
Anne
AAC/AAF/AFBV62.0844.AZ
http://www.tckworld.com/opfoot
Shirlawn - 21 Jan 2005 20:12 GMT
Anne, I do not know. It is beginning to bug me. There were 4 of the same
posts today when I signed on. What does the <B> at the beginning and end mean?
Should I answer it?
Shirlawn
me2@dn14.net - 21 Jan 2005 20:39 GMT
>Anne, I do not know. It is beginning to bug me. There were 4 of the same
>posts today when I signed on. What does the <B> at the beginning and end mean?
> Should I answer it?
>
>Shirlawn
Do you have any other saved emails from AOL? if so try comparing the
headers of those with those of these. Look closely at the message ID
bit, ie do you "know to be from aol messages" have a message id like
MessageId: <200412061200.0000001@ttttt.aol.com>
does the bit after @ end in ttttt.aol.com or is it something
different?
--
Andy
me2@dn14.net - 21 Jan 2005 20:42 GMT
>>Anne, I do not know. It is beginning to bug me. There were 4 of the same
>>posts today when I signed on. What does the <B> at the beginning and end mean?
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>does the bit after @ end in ttttt.aol.com or is it something
>different?
also note this bit:
Organization: AOL htp://www.aol.com
I would have thought it should be http://www.aol.com not htp?
--
Andy
me2@dn14.net - 21 Jan 2005 21:16 GMT
>. What does the <B> at the beginning and end mean?
>Shirlawn
It's simply hyper text mark up language [hmtl] for making the text
bold <B>Hello </B> read in a html rather than plain text email would
look bold.
--
Andy
Carole - 21 Jan 2005 23:26 GMT
> Anne, I do not know. It is beginning to bug me. There were 4 of the same
> posts today when I signed on. What does the <B> at the beginning and end mean?
> Should I answer it?
>
> Shirlawn
If it's <B> at the beginning and </B> at the end, it's just html code
for bold type.
Carole
Mary Z - 21 Jan 2005 20:42 GMT
>Did anyone else get this post? note date, just came 3 days ago, and last three
>days get the sanE post.
I did some quick searchin on the internet and several other groups
have picke this post up, AOL makes no mention of it on their website.
There seems to be conflicting information. Someone on AOL should call
support and ask.
Here are some snippets I pulled up from a newsgroup search.
(posted Jan 20):
(quote)
My chat with AOL Tech Support:
AOLTechJCD: I understand that you heard or read that Newgroups
on AOL
will be discontinued. That information is a scam. That is definitely
not
true, Karen. Newsgroups will always be a feature on AOL and if ever
that will
happen, we see to
it that we officially inform all our members about it.
(end quote)
Here is another copy of a post:
(quote)
REPEAT: The official word from AOL is that this is a scam. There are
no plans
to discontinue newsgroups, and if they ever make a decision to change
that, you
will receive an e-mail notification from them -- they would not post
it to
newsgroups.
Further, AOL mail reports that BoardsAdmin is a non-existent address.
(end quote)

Signature
Visit my website:
http://www.mzuschlag.com
me2@dn14.net - 21 Jan 2005 20:58 GMT
>>Did anyone else get this post? note date, just came 3 days ago, and last three
>>days get the sanE post.
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>
>(end quote)
I agree with Mary, you can check out usenet coverage of this on
several newsgroups here:
http://makeashorterlink.com/?U1D812B4A
--
Andy
Shirlawn - 21 Jan 2005 22:00 GMT
Thanks Mary Z, Andy, everyone. I didn"t think it was legit.
Shirlawn
Diane - 22 Jan 2005 00:15 GMT
shirlawn,
you can forward that email to tosgeneral@aol.com. i've had a few "aol"
scams lately and just forward stuff to that address. they get back and
tell you if it was from them or not.
regarding the newsgroup issue tho--i called several different aol tech
people when aol started having problems with asa and they didn't even
understand what a newsgroup was. i finally gave up.
diane
Don Kirkman - 22 Jan 2005 23:03 GMT
It seems to me I heard somewhere that Shirlawn wrote in article
<20050121114637.06767.00000055@mb-m20.aol.com>:
>Did anyone else get this post? note date, just came 3 days ago, and last three
>days get the sanE post.
>Shirlawn
>Subject: Note: The AOL Newsgroup service will be discontinued in early
>2005.
>From: BoardsAdmin@aol.com (BoardsAdmin)
>Date: 6 Dec 2004 12:00:00 GMT
>Please Note: The AOL Newsgroup service will be discontinued in early 2005.
>For members using AOL over a dial-up connection, you will no longer be able to
>access Newsgroups. If you have a separate high-speed connection, you can
>contact your broadband provider to see if they offer Newsgroups. Newsgroup
>services can often be accessed through a third party reader, such as Mozilla
>Thunderbird (http://www.mozilla.org/projects/thunderbird/).
>Alternatively, you can access Newsgroups via Google at
>http://groups.google.com/.
>We apologize for this inconvenience.
> ------------------- Headers --------------------
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>Organization: AOL htp://www.aol.com
>MessageId: <200412061200.0000001@ttttt.aol.com>
Shirlawn, I didn't look at your message in detail when I first
downloaded it, but I'm almost certain it's fake. First, other AOL users
should have received the same thing if it really came from AOL. Second,
I would think the media would be making a big thing out of an AOL move
of this sort. Third, the headers look odd. The Path header looks to be
illegitimate. The URL in the Organization header is broken, and so is
the domain in the Message ID header (the legitimate form is Message-ID),
and legitimate AOL messages have real information between the "@" and
the "aol.com", where these headers have only "tttt."
There have been similar false messages in the past, generated by robots
programmed to imitate real messages and to carry disruptive or
disturbing information like this one has.

Signature
Don
Old age is when you start saying "I wish I knew now what I knew then."