Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Arthritis / December 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

An appeal to reason

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Rosemarie Shiver - 20 Dec 2004 16:55 GMT
Rosie Shiver has managed to turn all of asc-p against her but she
still won't stop her harassment. That's because she doesn't care what
people in asc-p think of her. She does care what the people in her
other groups think and that's why I am going to keep posting until she
stops.

news:T6qxd.3561$iD.1835@fed1read05
> Get it clear lady, I've never been in trouble in my life ..
> for pills or anything else.  I haven't needed to be reformed
> for anything.  But since you were so kind as to bring up my
> nick in this, I will reply to it.
>
> Are you saying it's ok to sell pills to 'regular' people,
> but just not convicts?  Do you think anyone who's ever been
> in trouble should have 'convicted felon' tattoo'd across
> their forehead so people can see them coming?  Do you not
> believe someone can make a mistake and be reformed?  Do you
> really think anyone reading your silly posts is convinced
> that someone buying a bottle of pills that was originally
> purchased from an online pharmacy is a criminal?  She could
> have ordered them herself just as easily, but since the lady
> who bought them changed her mind, she helped her out by
> getting them from her and saving the lady from a extremely
> pissed off hubby once he got the credit card bill and
> realized how much she had paid for them.  Selling them to a
> friend then gets her the money back and she can say 'see
> honey, I was only buying them for someone else and I have
> the money towards the bill'.
>
> Nah, of course you won't say anything like that.  It
> wouldn't go along with your flaming and might make you look
> like a reasonable, thinking person.
>
> The pills were bought from an online pharmacy.  There were
> no docs to protect, they sell to anyone who can come up with
> the cash.
>
> You posts pretty much tell it all.  You are a nasty and
> vindictive poster and everyone sees you coming and if they
> have one working brain cell they know to stay away from you
> so you don't turn on them.
>
> Why not?  They would be doing the same thing she did?  You
> aren't concerned if they would do something illegal so you'd
> have more material to post about?  Why then are you only
> going after one certain person .. comeon, you can tell us,
> I'm sure it has nothing to do with the pills or her record
> just by the way you worded this paragraph.  Tell us the real
> reason you are so full of hatred for her.
>
> It proves she doesn't want to talk to YOU about her past.
> Hard to imagine why not, after we've all read the sweet
> things you have posted about it.  She's talked about it with
> others who have asked, it's YOU that is the problem and YOU
> she has no desire to talk to, given the way YOU blow it all
> out of proportion.
>
> She doesn't have to say the name of the drug...you've posted
> it more times than I can count, as have others.  Again, what
> is your real problem with her?
>
> Yeah, hard to drop something when you are so consumed with
> hatred that you aren't happy with your own life unless you
> are making someone else's totally miserable.
>
> One last time, she had 1 total case, with charges filed at
> separate times, one before the end of the year, one after.
> Look again at the report number and you will plainly see
> it's the same, only the first two numbers on the report, the
> year's date, is different.  The case was done as one, but
> had more then one charge, nothing unusual at all in that.
> My hubby dealt with cases like that all the time when he was
> on the force.
>
> Anyone that can read has seen by your vindictive posts what
> you are like once someone does something you don't approve
> of.  They are smart to not get close to you and have you do
> the same thing to them.
>
> xx doesn't post anything like you, there is no reason to
> ignore his posts.  He doesn't have an agenda like you do.
> He's very upfront and honest about what he feels and thinks.
>
> When talking about insulting posts .. maybe you should read
> your own posts more carefully.  That old saying you reap
> what you sow applies to you.
Thumper - 20 Dec 2004 18:21 GMT
>She does care what the people in her
>other groups think and that's why I am going to keep posting until she
>stops.

Translation: I don't give a f.ck about anyone else, so I am going to
ruin as many newsgroups as I possibly can. This has nothing to do with
one individual; it's cyber-masturbation. Post and conquer, ruin every
damned newsgroup out there all in the name of "stopping" someone
else...

~Thumper~
==========
http://kathompson.blogspot.com ~ Peek inside my head!
It's not empty, I swear!
Rosemarie Shiver - 20 Dec 2004 19:26 GMT
>Translation: I don't give a f.ck about anyone else, so I am going to
>ruin as many newsgroups as I possibly can. This has nothing to do with
>one individual;

Of course it does. Stop trying to stereotype me for a moment and read
Rosie's own words in asc-p.  http://tinyurl.com/68nxs

If she was doing that in your group would you just ignore it and hope
it goes away? How long would you do that before you tried something
else?

> it's cyber-masturbation. Post and conquer, ruin every
>damned newsgroup out there all in the name of "stopping" someone
>else...

Rosie doesn't care about anyone in asc-p and that's why she is ruining
our group. I didn't start out to make a nuisance of myself the first
time this happened. I asked for help and was rebuffed by Rosie's
ardent supporters. It was only AFTER I made a nuisance of myself that
her friends prevailed upon her to stop trolling asc-p.

You want me to stop doing this? Then give me some idea of how to stop
Rosie from harassing and trolling in asc-p. Ignoring her doesn't work.
Condemning her doesn't work.
johnie - 20 Dec 2004 20:19 GMT
> You want me to stop doing this? Then give me some idea of how to stop
> Rosie from harassing and trolling in asc-p. Ignoring her doesn't work.
> Condemning her doesn't work.

don't you get it yet 'juba bean'? you can post till your your butt seals
itself shut. we don't care. your not that hard to ignore. In fact, the
more you post the easier it becomes. You have become silly background
noise. Run thru my filters its not even noticeable. The negativeness of
what you do will eventually suck whats left of your soul completely dry.
Its your time, your life, waste it.

happy holidays,
johnie
Rosemarie Shiver - 20 Dec 2004 21:25 GMT
>don't you get it yet 'juba bean'?

I'm not Juba, but don't let that stop you from blaming him and talking
out of your fat a.s.

>you can post till your your butt seals
>itself shut. we don't care. your not that hard to ignore. In fact, the
>more you post the easier it becomes. You have become silly background
>noise. Run thru my filters its not even noticeable.

Then why are you still talking to me?
Use your filters and STFU.

LOL @ johnie Hugs from Rosie#2
Mike-UK - 21 Dec 2004 12:09 GMT
> >don't you get it yet 'juba bean'?
>
> I'm not Juba, but don't let that stop you from blaming him and talking
> out of your fat a.s.

If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck...

Damn but you're SLOW! ;)

> >you can post till your your butt seals
> >itself shut. we don't care. your not that hard to ignore. In fact, the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Then why are you still talking to me?
> Use your filters and STFU.

Occasionally, just occasionally, your presence can be ever
so slightly amusing, but nothing more than that. Don't
flatter yourself that anyone has the slightest impression
you have a brain, or even any character worth paying
attention to beyond the efforts anyone would make to get
something yukky off their shoe.

Your irritation value has predictable dropped just short of
"off the radar", which means you are almost a stealth-idiot,
your wit, as ever, is only just this side of anti-matter,
and, as I mentioned, if anyone bothers to reply at all, its
generally because they are posting for their own
satisfaction or amusement, not your edification.

If you were wonderin about making the same fatuous comment
about STFU (how original... how 90s... :\ ), for the record,
I was responding to a post with Johnie's name on it. Now
THERE's an interesting guy people look forward to hearing
from! :)

P.S. Hi Johnie! Howzit hangin' dude! :)

Signature

www.deja-moo.co.uk/~mikesweb
----------------------------------------------
When the "official" line is an obvious construction,
and a deluge of distractions and spurious accusations
land on the first person to object to it,
a nice juicy conspiracy theory
is a good place to start.

"What I want to know is..."
(Edison Carter - 20mins into the future)

"Aaaaaagh!" - Katherine Harris
www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1027042harris1.html
----------------------------------------------
www.buzzflash.com

johnie - 21 Dec 2004 22:39 GMT
> P.S. Hi Johnie! Howzit hangin' dude! :)

just looking for a 'reason to appeal'...maestro.>g<

johnie
ThePsyko - 20 Dec 2004 21:32 GMT
>>Translation: I don't give a f.ck about anyone else, so I am going to
>>ruin as many newsgroups as I possibly can. This has nothing to do with
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> it goes away? How long would you do that before you tried something
> else?

You *ARE* doing it in our group dumbass - I guess then by your own logic
it's fair to do it to you..

game on then?

>> it's cyber-masturbation. Post and conquer, ruin every
>>damned newsgroup out there all in the name of "stopping" someone
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> ardent supporters. It was only AFTER I made a nuisance of myself that
> her friends prevailed upon her to stop trolling asc-p.

So she has stopped but you haven't.

Nice.

> You want me to stop doing this? Then give me some idea of how to stop
> Rosie from harassing and trolling in asc-p. Ignoring her doesn't work.
> Condemning her doesn't work.

"I won't stop harassing you until you help me stop harassing me"

Yeah, nice logic there bananabrain.  PKB much?

Signature

/(bb|[^b]{2})/ that is the Question

ThePsyko
Public Enemy #7
http://prozac.iscool.net

Newsgroup Spambuster - 20 Dec 2004 22:54 GMT
WE LOVE YOU ROSIE!!!

Sorry to see your attention seeking stalker is being so silly again!

Donna G
Gwen Love - 20 Dec 2004 23:39 GMT
Yes, we do, Rosie--a bunch!
Gwen

> WE LOVE YOU ROSIE!!!
>
> Sorry to see your attention seeking stalker is being so silly again!
>
> Donna G
Harvey R. Stone - 21 Dec 2004 04:15 GMT
> Yes, we do, Rosie--a bunch!
> Gwen

Hhhhhmmmm  ahwell,,, never mind it is not worth it.
Harv
Thumper - 21 Dec 2004 06:36 GMT
>If she was doing that in your group would you just ignore it and hope
>it goes away? How long would you do that before you tried something
>else?

I would do what I generally do when an assmunch invades: killfile and
ignore. Try it sometimes; it works.

>Rosie doesn't care about anyone in asc-p and that's why she is ruining
>our group. I didn't start out to make a nuisance of myself the first
>time this happened

Thres no excuse for turning yourself into a nusiance in other NGs.
What goes in in another NG is not the fault of this NG, nor is it our
job to stop your problems.

>You want me to stop doing this? Then give me some idea of how to stop
>Rosie from harassing and trolling in asc-p. Ignoring her doesn't work.
>Condemning her doesn't work.

If you can't handle trolls, get off the Internet.
Learn to killfile.
Learn to ignore. And yes, you CAN ignore if you really want to.

Bottom line: you're having way too much fun disrupting and ruining
other newsgroups. And that says way more about you than it does about
anyone you're politicing against.

~Thumper~
==========
http://kathompson.blogspot.com ~ Peek inside my head!
It's not empty, I swear!
loose_cannon - 22 Dec 2004 04:44 GMT
>>If she was doing that in your group would you just ignore it and hope
>>it goes away? How long would you do that before you tried something
>>else?
>
> I would do what I generally do when an assmunch invades: killfile and
> ignore. Try it sometimes; it works.

is that whut yer doin now?
ThePsyko - 20 Dec 2004 21:29 GMT
> Rosie Shiver has managed to turn all of asc-p against her but she
> still won't stop her harassment. That's because she doesn't care what
> people in asc-p think of her. She does care what the people in her
> other groups think and that's why I am going to keep posting until she
> stops.

that makes you no better than she is.  

Signature

/(bb|[^b]{2})/ that is the Question

ThePsyko
Public Enemy #7
http://prozac.iscool.net

Newsgroup Spambuster - 20 Dec 2004 22:50 GMT
Dear Silly Stupid Stalker,

You are far denser than anyone could have ever imagined, so let me just
make it perfectly clear to you (if that is even
possible!).....................

WE LOVE ROSIE!!!

No amount of your ridiculous slanderous false lies are going to change
that.   Doesn't matter what you post or how many times you post or how
many different names you hijack or how many different sock puppets you
use, NOTHING will change our minds!!!

WE LOVE ROSIE!!!

You only serve to make yourself look like the sick individual you are
with your games that you play.    If you aren't mature enough and/or
grown up enough to deal with things in your own group
(alt.support.chronic-pain) then perhaps you should seek some outside
couseling, because illegally stalking and illegally forging others
names/addys is obviously getting you know where.   PLEASE get some help
for yourself SOON!!!

WE LOVE ROSIE, and WE ALWAYS WILL!!!

D.
Harvey R. Stone - 21 Dec 2004 04:14 GMT
"Newsgroup Spambuster"

We have all said that my dear.  If things go as before you will be jumped on
for saying it now.   Toooo many people have them kill filed and you and I
make them see the abuse and they do not want to see the abuse   Its almost
like it is OK as long as they do not see it.  Anyway the accepted thing to
do is shut up.
Harv
ShenMei9 - 21 Dec 2004 04:44 GMT
Harv,
I understand what you are saying.  There are times when it is absolutely
imperative to not ignore something.  I respect that.  However, we can change
nothing here by direct confrontation.  Most internet "people who are very
argumentative and need negative attention" (again, a promise to my old gals to
not use derogatory terms) will only feed on confrontation back and forth.  This
particular person I think is possibly a litle OCD and if not, that is certainly
feeling a lot of pain.  We win by using impulse control and we keep the group
geared towards support.

That doesn't mean I am not forwarding headers to ISPs and it also doesn't mean
I won't continue working in other ways to identify and contain out llittle
buddy.  I can pray for his healing, turn him/her into cyber GA's and still sit
on my hands. The only way he/she can hijack this group is if we all refuse to
play.  

And to top it all off, i am just plain bored with the obvious and childish
posts he/she makes

Who was it on this grouo who used a sig line about not having to show up at
every fight?

m
Harvey R. Stone - 21 Dec 2004 09:06 GMT
> Harv,
> I understand what you are saying.  There are times when it is absolutely
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> m

Thank you for that.  Makes sense to me.
Harv
loose_cannon - 22 Dec 2004 04:44 GMT
> That doesn't mean I am not forwarding headers to ISPs

fuckin netKKKop
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.