Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Arthritis / April 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Socialized Medicine

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Califchief - 03 Apr 2008 08:00 GMT
Originally posted in alt.support.cancer.prostate

> I cannot COMPREHEND why anyone would want the government
> to manage or oversee their health care.

But many do.

Here is a citation to a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada
decision in Chaoulli v. Quebec (Attorney General), 2005 SCC 35,
 [2005] 1S.C.R.791.

In that decision, the Court held that the socialised medicine scheme
under consideration did little more than generate long waiting lines
for medical service. Seems that the plaintiff had been *forbidden* to
seek medical care outside the bounds of the government-managed system.

Also: I'll remind folks of Hugh Kernley, who I miss with all my heart.
He was *first* dxd with extensive metastases. He rarely saw the same
NHS (National Health Service) oncologist twice, the medics having each
time to try to brief themselves on his case -- not always thoroughly.
He was in intense pain from his mets. For a long time, that wonder of
socialized medicine miscalled the National Health *Service* refused to
prescribe anything more than various forms of narcotics. Finally, with
encouragement from this side of the pond, he managed to get radiation
therapy for the mets. He told me that it worked wonders. But too late.

Certainly, we Yanks have problems with our medical care system (if
such it can be called) but by God we don't have to wait months to see
a medic and we have our choice of whom to see. Yes, that's sometimes
modified by the vagaries of insurance carriers, but we do nonetheless
have choices -- not forced by government clerks to comply.

And I know for a certainty that some of our brothers from the Frozen
North travel south to receive their PCa care.

Did I hear someone say that it's "free?"  No it is not.

That is a falsehood.  TANSTAAFL

   There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch.

Snicker if you will, but it is a home truth.

Regards,

Steve J
  Tired from ranting.

___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12
spodosaurus - 03 Apr 2008 15:38 GMT
>   Originally posted in alt.support.cancer.prostate
>
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
>  
> ___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12

Considering all the other nations with health care as a right (just like
education), why do people keep trotting out the same old tired examples
of the UK and Canada? Still, if you cannot afford insurance, they're far
better than you get in the US.

Ari

Signature

spammage trappage: remove the underscores to reply
Many people around the world are waiting for a marrow transplant. Please
volunteer to be a marrow donor and literally save someone's life:
http://www.abmdr.org.au/
http://www.marrow.org/

shenmei9wise@gmail.com - 03 Apr 2008 19:13 GMT
> >   Originally posted in alt.support.cancer.prostate
>
[quoted text clipped - 57 lines]
> Many people around the world are waiting for a marrow transplant. Please
> volunteer to be a marrow donor and literally save someone's life:http://www.abmdr.org.au/http://www.marrow.org/

I am with you on this, Ari.  I have literally seen people die in this
country from lack of good health care who have had insurance.  The
stress of trying to come up with the required almost 2000.00 a month
to pay for my insurance is horrifyingly unhealthy.  Any of us who have
HMO's are probably getting substandard care.  We do not have the
highest standard of healthcare in the world-we used to when I was a
kid and is you had insurance, your doctor decided what you needed.  My
two long-term relationships have been with men who are brilliant
doctors and my best friend is a doctor.They all every day think about
quitting medicine because they can't give the best care to their
patients.  Michael actually has left medicine in this country to work
full time for DWB/MSF because he could not in good conscience,
continue working in the US in a system that not only didn't work for
poor people-it doesn't work for many many middle class people .I spent
thousands of dollars last year on my daughter's healthcare because she
was with Kaiser.  I finally just bit the bullet and paid for health
care.  That took almost all of the money I had saved for any type of
retirement.  She, by the way, is now on Medi-Cal, having gotten SSDI
first try in just three months-she was that sick.  She is getting a
much better quality of care through Medi-Cal which will become Medi-
care in two years and should be even better.  SIDE NOTE:  It is just
fascinating to read the responses people had to the medicare system
when it was first proposed.  It was called a communist plot by many
people and it was commonly thought that it would ruin the quality of
health care in the US.  Strangely enough, geriatrics health care is
one of the few places where the US is not at the bottom of the pile
among the industrial world.

I have so many friends who are European who get great quality of
health care.  Sometimes it is laborious and can take several  months
to get to a specialist for non-emergency care but for emergency care,
I have heard very few complaints. I have a friend who is an Australian
writer who flew back to Perth when she was diagnosed with breast
cancer because she felt her quality of care would be better (she  is
now almost three years cancer free, by the way).  This is not just one
story:  it includes my friend liam who flew home to Ireland to get
treatment for prostate cancer even though as a visiting professor, he
was insured through UCSF.  He felt like his quality of care would be
better.  I have a friend who has arthritis and is Swedish-She is on
ABT (antibiotic therapy) and is doing great.  She teaches a Cornell
and has health insurance but goes back to Sweden every three months to
get a series of IV's and her oral antibiotics.  She says it is much
less hassle than trying to negotiate the HMO system she would have
access to.   Conversely, I have a friend who teaches at Mcgill  and
loves the Canadian health care system although she says is varies
greatly from province to province.

What we have now is not working-it doesn't work for me, it didn't work
for my daughter, it didn't work for the 17 year old girl who was
denied a transplant by CIGNA and died.  The list is endless and it is
not only the poor who but the middle class who are stressed beyond
belief as they try to pay for health care.  I have been doing nothing
but struggling with health care for the last two years.  First Pac
Advanage pulled out of California living 200,000 of us uncovered and
small agencies scrambling for health care. Then it was my horrifying
stint at Kaiser which so inferior as medical care that I should have
saved the money; now it is  the CIGNA rates that are almost 2000.00 a
month (hum...homeless of insured?) .

I used to spend my days doing real things like debriefing  Katrina
first responders, doing medical care for the homeless and working with
HIV health care, doing trauma workshops for first responders and
children right after 9-11, doing millions of projects with the kids
(blanket project, soup kitchen project, on and on), and even doing
things for ASA (postcard project, secret sender projects,).  The
health care system in this country has literally made me so self
absorbed as i try to scramble for money to pay my own insurance after
having spent thousands upon thousands on my daughter's health care,
that there is nothing left for others.

I am seriously,as I write, packing things in this wonderful house
which I can no longer afford, and beginning to search for housing in
Oregon and Hawaii  because i can get at least affordable health
insurance in these states.

I am not an anomaly.   I have this same conversation with people every
day.  OUR HEALTH CARE SYSTEM IS NOT WORKING.

m
ANN M - 03 Apr 2008 20:29 GMT
m,
That was an excellent portrayal of what is going on in our health care
system.  I have been in managed care since becoming disabled, Blue Chip
for Medicare, and am having a terrible problem with coverage for my
medications.  Two of the more expensive ones have been denied twice and
about the only ones I have coverage for are the cheaper generics.  So
far I have no problem with referrals to specialists of which I see five
different ones.  Hospitalization is a problem with a large copay for
each day in hospital.

A friend who lost his job and group rates when his company closed, is
paying almost $900 month for individual coverage and has enormous copays
for everything.
We need changes and we need them soon.

Ann
Jayne - 03 Apr 2008 21:01 GMT
> I am seriously,as I write, packing things in this wonderful house
> which I can no longer afford, and beginning to search for housing in
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> m

Your post was exellent M - fair and balanced and all the things the OP
wasn't.

As a very long time lurker, I don't know enough about US healthcare to have
an opinion.  I'm afraid I don't know how your system works.

I know how our system in the UK works though.  It isn't perfect, but its
better than it was a few years ago.  It costs us nothing extra.  All of the
arthritis treatments I have had - sulphasalazine, methotrexate, arava, all
the other anti-inflammatories, steroids, painkillers etc, until I got to
Enbrel, which works, cost me nothing.  Nor did I have difficulty obtaining
it - yes we got the biologics a couple of years later than the US, but I've
been taking Enbrel almost 5 years, and never paid a penny.  It is delivered
every 4 weeks in a refrigerated vehicle to me cost free, and is a brilliant
service.

I have had diagnostics, bone scans, arthroscopies and two knee replacements
plus the necessary rehabilitation, and have not had to worry about paying
for them out of the family budget.  If me or my husband were to lose our
jobs, we still wouldn't have to worry.

I know we have to wait longer, but my longest wait was 6 months for my first
knee replacement on the NHS.  Now in my opinion a TKR is not an emergency -
it doesn't need to be done immediately.  By the time you get to that stage,
in general you've lived with knee pain a long time.  Here in the UK you can
jump the queue and get it done pretty quickly if you are prepared to go at
short notice and accept a cancellation.

I can't generalise about other countries systems as I don't know enough
about them, and I really dislike uninformed opinions.  But until you have a
system that is bulletproof and treats EVERYONE, please don't preach about
others.

Jayne
d'huit - 03 Apr 2008 21:30 GMT
On Apr 3, 7:38 am, spodosaurus <spodosaurus@_yahoo_.com> wrote:
> Califchief wrote:
> >   Originally posted in alt.support.cancer.prostate
[quoted text clipped - 59 lines]
> volunteer to be a marrow donor and literally save someone's
> life:http://www.abmdr.org.au/http://www.marrow.org/

I am with you on this, Ari.  I have literally seen people die in this
country from lack of good health care who have had insurance.  The
stress of trying to come up with the required almost 2000.00 a month
to pay for my insurance is horrifyingly unhealthy.  Any of us who have
HMO's are probably getting substandard care.  We do not have the
highest standard of healthcare in the world-we used to when I was a
kid and is you had insurance, your doctor decided what you needed.  My
two long-term relationships have been with men who are brilliant
doctors and my best friend is a doctor.They all every day think about
quitting medicine because they can't give the best care to their
patients.  Michael actually has left medicine in this country to work
full time for DWB/MSF because he could not in good conscience,
continue working in the US in a system that not only didn't work for
poor people-it doesn't work for many many middle class people .I spent
thousands of dollars last year on my daughter's healthcare because she
was with Kaiser.  I finally just bit the bullet and paid for health
care.  That took almost all of the money I had saved for any type of
retirement.  She, by the way, is now on Medi-Cal, having gotten SSDI
first try in just three months-she was that sick.  She is getting a
much better quality of care through Medi-Cal which will become Medi-
care in two years and should be even better.  SIDE NOTE:  It is just
fascinating to read the responses people had to the medicare system
when it was first proposed.  It was called a communist plot by many
people and it was commonly thought that it would ruin the quality of
health care in the US.  Strangely enough, geriatrics health care is
one of the few places where the US is not at the bottom of the pile
among the industrial world.

I have so many friends who are European who get great quality of
health care.  Sometimes it is laborious and can take several  months
to get to a specialist for non-emergency care but for emergency care,
I have heard very few complaints. I have a friend who is an Australian
writer who flew back to Perth when she was diagnosed with breast
cancer because she felt her quality of care would be better (she  is
now almost three years cancer free, by the way).  This is not just one
story:  it includes my friend liam who flew home to Ireland to get
treatment for prostate cancer even though as a visiting professor, he
was insured through UCSF.  He felt like his quality of care would be
better.  I have a friend who has arthritis and is Swedish-She is on
ABT (antibiotic therapy) and is doing great.  She teaches a Cornell
and has health insurance but goes back to Sweden every three months to
get a series of IV's and her oral antibiotics.  She says it is much
less hassle than trying to negotiate the HMO system she would have
access to.   Conversely, I have a friend who teaches at Mcgill  and
loves the Canadian health care system although she says is varies
greatly from province to province.

What we have now is not working-it doesn't work for me, it didn't work
for my daughter, it didn't work for the 17 year old girl who was
denied a transplant by CIGNA and died.  The list is endless and it is
not only the poor who but the middle class who are stressed beyond
belief as they try to pay for health care.  I have been doing nothing
but struggling with health care for the last two years.  First Pac
Advanage pulled out of California living 200,000 of us uncovered and
small agencies scrambling for health care. Then it was my horrifying
stint at Kaiser which so inferior as medical care that I should have
saved the money; now it is  the CIGNA rates that are almost 2000.00 a
month (hum...homeless of insured?) .

I used to spend my days doing real things like debriefing  Katrina
first responders, doing medical care for the homeless and working with
HIV health care, doing trauma workshops for first responders and
children right after 9-11, doing millions of projects with the kids
(blanket project, soup kitchen project, on and on), and even doing
things for ASA (postcard project, secret sender projects,).  The
health care system in this country has literally made me so self
absorbed as i try to scramble for money to pay my own insurance after
having spent thousands upon thousands on my daughter's health care,
that there is nothing left for others.

I am seriously,as I write, packing things in this wonderful house
which I can no longer afford, and beginning to search for housing in
Oregon and Hawaii  because i can get at least affordable health
insurance in these states.

I am not an anomaly.   I have this same conversation with people every
day.  OUR HEALTH CARE SYSTEM IS NOT WORKING.

m

i concur.  i've got bs/bc traditional coverage and that's considered very
good coverage in this state.  but, i've been told by two of my own doctors,
that even with really good medical coverage, medicine is indeed being
rationed in our country -- rationed by the doctors who are pressured by
insurers to ration testing, treatments and time spent on each patient to
keep their, the insurers, payouts down.  don't think for one moment that
your medical care is being decided upon by your doctors who actually know
what you need.  the quality of your medical care in this nation is being
decided and dictated by medical insurance companies.  as for HMOs, all of
the doctors i've seen over the years (even my doctors at kaiser and group
health--both of which are HMOs) consider them "group death organizations"
(their words, not mine).

kate
d'huit - 03 Apr 2008 21:56 GMT
<shenmei9wise@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:0300b9af-e2cb-4122-bc5a-36dca131b698@b5g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 3, 7:38 am, spodosaurus <spodosaurus@_yahoo_.com> wrote:
> Califchief wrote:
> >   Originally posted in alt.support.cancer.prostate
[quoted text clipped - 59 lines]
> volunteer to be a marrow donor and literally save someone's
> life:http://www.abmdr.org.au/http://www.marrow.org/

I am with you on this, Ari.  I have literally seen people die in this
country from lack of good health care who have had insurance.  The
stress of trying to come up with the required almost 2000.00 a month
to pay for my insurance is horrifyingly unhealthy.  Any of us who have
HMO's are probably getting substandard care.  We do not have the
highest standard of healthcare in the world-we used to when I was a
kid and is you had insurance, your doctor decided what you needed.  My
two long-term relationships have been with men who are brilliant
doctors and my best friend is a doctor.They all every day think about
quitting medicine because they can't give the best care to their
patients.  Michael actually has left medicine in this country to work
full time for DWB/MSF because he could not in good conscience,
continue working in the US in a system that not only didn't work for
poor people-it doesn't work for many many middle class people .I spent
thousands of dollars last year on my daughter's healthcare because she
was with Kaiser.  I finally just bit the bullet and paid for health
care.  That took almost all of the money I had saved for any type of
retirement.  She, by the way, is now on Medi-Cal, having gotten SSDI
first try in just three months-she was that sick.  She is getting a
much better quality of care through Medi-Cal which will become Medi-
care in two years and should be even better.  SIDE NOTE:  It is just
fascinating to read the responses people had to the medicare system
when it was first proposed.  It was called a communist plot by many
people and it was commonly thought that it would ruin the quality of
health care in the US.  Strangely enough, geriatrics health care is
one of the few places where the US is not at the bottom of the pile
among the industrial world.

I have so many friends who are European who get great quality of
health care.  Sometimes it is laborious and can take several  months
to get to a specialist for non-emergency care but for emergency care,
I have heard very few complaints. I have a friend who is an Australian
writer who flew back to Perth when she was diagnosed with breast
cancer because she felt her quality of care would be better (she  is
now almost three years cancer free, by the way).  This is not just one
story:  it includes my friend liam who flew home to Ireland to get
treatment for prostate cancer even though as a visiting professor, he
was insured through UCSF.  He felt like his quality of care would be
better.  I have a friend who has arthritis and is Swedish-She is on
ABT (antibiotic therapy) and is doing great.  She teaches a Cornell
and has health insurance but goes back to Sweden every three months to
get a series of IV's and her oral antibiotics.  She says it is much
less hassle than trying to negotiate the HMO system she would have
access to.   Conversely, I have a friend who teaches at Mcgill  and
loves the Canadian health care system although she says is varies
greatly from province to province.

What we have now is not working-it doesn't work for me, it didn't work
for my daughter, it didn't work for the 17 year old girl who was
denied a transplant by CIGNA and died.  The list is endless and it is
not only the poor who but the middle class who are stressed beyond
belief as they try to pay for health care.  I have been doing nothing
but struggling with health care for the last two years.  First Pac
Advanage pulled out of California living 200,000 of us uncovered and
small agencies scrambling for health care. Then it was my horrifying
stint at Kaiser which so inferior as medical care that I should have
saved the money; now it is  the CIGNA rates that are almost 2000.00 a
month (hum...homeless of insured?) .

I used to spend my days doing real things like debriefing  Katrina
first responders, doing medical care for the homeless and working with
HIV health care, doing trauma workshops for first responders and
children right after 9-11, doing millions of projects with the kids
(blanket project, soup kitchen project, on and on), and even doing
things for ASA (postcard project, secret sender projects,).  The
health care system in this country has literally made me so self
absorbed as i try to scramble for money to pay my own insurance after
having spent thousands upon thousands on my daughter's health care,
that there is nothing left for others.

I am seriously,as I write, packing things in this wonderful house
which I can no longer afford, and beginning to search for housing in
Oregon and Hawaii  because i can get at least affordable health
insurance in these states.

I am not an anomaly.   I have this same conversation with people every
day.  OUR HEALTH CARE SYSTEM IS NOT WORKING.

m

i concur.  i've got bs/bc traditional coverage and that's considered very
good coverage in this state.  but, i've been told by two of my own doctors,
that even with really good medical coverage, medicine is indeed being
rationed in our country -- rationed by the doctors who are pressured by
insurers to ration testing, treatments and time spent on each patient to
keep their, the insurers, payouts down.  don't think for one moment that
your medical care is being decided upon by your doctors who actually know
what you need.  the quality of your medical care in this nation is being
decided and dictated by medical insurance companies.  as for HMOs, all of
the doctors i've seen over the years (even my doctors at kaiser and group
health--both of which are HMOs) consider them "group death organizations"
(their words, not mine).

kate

and i want to add, the scope of employee medical insurance coverage is not
only dictated by insurers to doctors, but also by the companies who purchase
the coverage from insurers for their employees.  these companies negotiate
with insurers what will and will not be covered to limit the companies'
costs; and those company generated limitations on our medical care get
dictated to doctors through the insurers.  so it seems "our bodies are owned
by the company store", so to speak.

kate
Diane - 03 Apr 2008 23:22 GMT
First, I've taken the liberty of changing the heading to Universal
Health Care, meaning just what it says--health care that's available
to all citizens.

>>but by God we don't have to wait months to see
a medic and we have our choice of whom to see.<<

Joe, this may be true for you, but not for millions of Americans who
can't afford health care or who can't get it due to pre-existing
conditions. I have many friends who fall into those categories. John
and I moved to NC, in part, so that he could get insurance with his
Crohns disease. He pays 12K a year for his insurance.

The World Health Organization's most recent ranking of health care in
191 countries puts the US at #1 in terms of expenditures per capita
(more than double the next highest country), but only at 37th in
quality (infant mortality, etc)  http://dll.umaine.edu/ble/U.S.%20HCweb.pdf

Clearly something needs to change. We are the only "developed" country
that doesn't provide access to health care for all its people. No one
is saying we should copy exactly the health care system of another
country. We can learn from the flaws in the systems in Canada etc and
make our system better.

If anyone wants to educate themselves to the health care views of our
three primary candidates, here's a helpful and neutral site:
http://www.healthcentral.com/healthcare08/

This is such an important issue, and it affects so many of us right
here in this group.

diane
d'huit - 04 Apr 2008 00:40 GMT
First, I've taken the liberty of changing the heading to Universal
Health Care, meaning just what it says--health care that's available
to all citizens.

>>but by God we don't have to wait months to see
a medic and we have our choice of whom to see.<<

Joe, this may be true for you, but not for millions of Americans who
can't afford health care or who can't get it due to pre-existing
conditions. I have many friends who fall into those categories. John
and I moved to NC, in part, so that he could get insurance with his
Crohns disease. He pays 12K a year for his insurance.

The World Health Organization's most recent ranking of health care in
191 countries puts the US at #1 in terms of expenditures per capita
(more than double the next highest country), but only at 37th in
quality (infant mortality, etc)  http://dll.umaine.edu/ble/U.S.%20HCweb.pdf

Clearly something needs to change. We are the only "developed" country
that doesn't provide access to health care for all its people. No one
is saying we should copy exactly the health care system of another
country. We can learn from the flaws in the systems in Canada etc and
make our system better.

If anyone wants to educate themselves to the health care views of our
three primary candidates, here's a helpful and neutral site:
http://www.healthcentral.com/healthcare08/

This is such an important issue, and it affects so many of us right
here in this group.

diane

we all know that good universal coverage is not going to happen overnight,
bugs will have to be worked out of the system once it's begun; and
obviously, it is not going to be free for everybody.  input, from all
spectrums of our populace, will be necessary and valuable.  the web site you
provided, and thank you for posting it, diane, made me think of a question
that will have to be resolved by our legislators.  but, for most of us on
asa, i'm curious about our concensus/opinion:

what percentage of net income, individually and corporately, would you say
is a sane/livable percentage to contribute to national universal coverage?

kate
Translucent Troglodyte - 04 Apr 2008 19:07 GMT
>First, I've taken the liberty of changing the heading to Universal
>Health Care, meaning just what it says--health care that's available
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
>diane

My apologies for a lurker barging in on the scene...

The issue of health care is paramount to me, and not only from the
standpoint of humanity.

In the United States, I've been feeling a rage build about the issue
for a long time, and I've finally put it in economic terms that
everyone I talk to seems to agree upon, and that is this:

IMO, lack of guaranteed health coverage has stifled the economic
growth of this country.

The country was built upon an entrepreneurial spirit that simply
cannot thrive in this environment because it's really hard to be a
creative spirit when you have to work for someone else just because
you need insurance.

In today's terms, where would Daniel Kaymen (the Segway, and
wheelchairs that can climb stairs, etc.) be if he had had to put the
availability of health insurance before the development of his ideas?

I was diagnosed with MS at the age of 20, it has colored my entire
life, because I have always (well, at least since I started looking at
things with an adult eye) had to consider the availability of health
insurance first.  I'm certainly not the only person who has had to
make major life decisions based on nothing directly related to my
abilities or aspirations.

The insurance lobby will be hard to overcome; those profit margins of
close to 30% will be hard to argue against, but from a humanitarian
view, is it really proper to profit from illness?  I strongly disagree
with Senator McCain's opinion that the market will sort things out,
because there is no incentive for it to do so as long as it is allowed
to be exclusionary.

/soap box

TT
Signature

Gender is not binary

Diane - 04 Apr 2008 19:57 GMT
TT, Thanks for inserting your reasoned and calm email into this
discussion. I've been able to support myself at a writing career only
because I'm lucky enough to have government health insurance through
my former husband. I pay the entire premium myself, and it's a killer,
but at least I have it, unlike many other people. If not for that
insurance, I couldn't have this career and would have to go back to
being a social worker employed by a company/hospital that would offer
health insurance. And quite honestly, if I had to go back to that 9-5
work, I'd be on disability because I can no longer manage that
physically. Granted, the loss of my books to the world might not be
any big thing, but it's a big thing to me to be able to do the work I
love.

But leaving you and me and creativity out of it, I'm more worried  not
just aboutpeople living below the poverty line, but those middle
income people who cannot afford insurance (much less a vacation. ahem)
and those who are locked out because of pre-existing conditions.

diane
Translucent Troglodyte - 04 Apr 2008 20:59 GMT
>TT, Thanks for inserting your reasoned and calm email into this
>discussion. I've been able to support myself at a writing career only
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
>diane

I'm concerned about that group of people, too, but I make my argument
because it seems it would carry more weight in today's discussions
revolving around the decline of US productivity, value of the dollar,
etc.  I think the "movement" would gain more support, from more
diverse factions.

Since it seems that there are only a few people who truly care about
the people living at the margins, my thought is that if the case can
be made that these free-market policies are limiting America's growth
as much as our so-called poor education system, then those people on
the margins will benefit vicariously.  I don't think they'll care how
the assistance comes as long as it comes...

On a personal level, I'm facing the possibility/probability of
becoming officially disabled.  I have enough energy to do a desk job
and not much else, my living space certainly shows that....  It may
improve once I finally have my hip replacement and am not in chronic
pain, but... the fatigue from the MS is pretty bad, and I am getting
to the point where I need accomodations, not easy to attain in
general, and impossible to get working for a company with 2 full-time
employees...  that's a side track...  it scares the heck out of me as
to how I will cope in the 2 years between being approved for SSDI and
being eligible for Medicare.

I'm glad you are able to follow your heart, even though it makes the
road harder.

TT
Signature

Gender is not binary

d'huit - 04 Apr 2008 20:02 GMT
>First, I've taken the liberty of changing the heading to Universal
>Health Care, meaning just what it says--health care that's available
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
>diane

My apologies for a lurker barging in on the scene...

The issue of health care is paramount to me, and not only from the
standpoint of humanity.

In the United States, I've been feeling a rage build about the issue
for a long time, and I've finally put it in economic terms that
everyone I talk to seems to agree upon, and that is this:

IMO, lack of guaranteed health coverage has stifled the economic
growth of this country.

The country was built upon an entrepreneurial spirit that simply
cannot thrive in this environment because it's really hard to be a
creative spirit when you have to work for someone else just because
you need insurance.

In today's terms, where would Daniel Kaymen (the Segway, and
wheelchairs that can climb stairs, etc.) be if he had had to put the
availability of health insurance before the development of his ideas?

I was diagnosed with MS at the age of 20, it has colored my entire
life, because I have always (well, at least since I started looking at
things with an adult eye) had to consider the availability of health
insurance first.  I'm certainly not the only person who has had to
make major life decisions based on nothing directly related to my
abilities or aspirations.

The insurance lobby will be hard to overcome; those profit margins of
close to 30% will be hard to argue against, but from a humanitarian
view, is it really proper to profit from illness?  I strongly disagree
with Senator McCain's opinion that the market will sort things out,
because there is no incentive for it to do so as long as it is allowed
to be exclusionary.

/soap box

TT

don't apologize for being a lurker coming out of the shadows.  welcome to
asa, tt.  your comments offer an interesting perspective, one that isn't
generally thought about.

an aside to and pertenant to your perspective is the fact that many
companies (large enough to provide decent health care coverage)  lay claim
to, and wrench away from their employees, any new ideas or inventions that
their employees come up with, while employed with those companies.  often,
those ideas and inventions are buried in company archives and are never made
available to the marketplace.  that, too, stymies entrepreneureship, because
of the need for a job that provides medical coverage.

i, too, disagree that the marketplace will sort things out with regard to
the availability of medical coverage for everyone.  the marketplace is
self-correcting/self-adjusting, but only in terms of its
profitability/business oriented protocols.  and those protocols are not
always inclusive of, nor responsive to humanity's needs.  it has generally
been profit first mentality, and correction when outrage precipitates it.
profit is its sole/soul incentive.  biz is biz.

don't get me wrong.  business is important and capitalism is often a good
thing.  however, there are some things that business/capitalism, in its
quest for profits, makes quite a mess of and we witness that mess often,
during the course of each and every year.

kate
Nann Bell - 05 Apr 2008 03:56 GMT
Ok, I've been trying not to get into this fray, but I must - partly inspired
by TT (welcome out of lurkdom!).  My brother is an independent software
consultant and is good enough to demand rates that make my jaw drop.  He is
also nearing the 40th anniversary of being diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes.  
My SIL also has pre-existing conditions, in her case disabling ones that have
kept her from ever holding down a job so she doesn't even have disability.

My brother works hard, faithfully pays his taxes, pays his bills and has
never been on any kind of public assistance.  He also has always taken the
initiative in learning everything new that comes out about diabetes and works
to appropriately control his blood sugar levels.  But he has never been able
to buy decent health insurance because of the diabetes, however well
controlled it is, and because he is self-employed.  They finally were able to
get some group coverage through a professional organization but the group has
been unable to control costs and he now pays about the same as Melinda for
coverage with a *$10,000* deductible.  Do those of you who oppose universal
coverage honestly think this is right?

As for making decisions - my husband decided to go back to school to become a
priest.  Generally this would be considered an admirable thing.  Our health
insurance favored MDs and services provided through Shands Health Care in
Florida, so we had to change to something that covered us where the seminary
was.  Our only available option was a student plan that was generous in MD
and services coverage, but topped out on prescriptions at $4000.  This kept
me from trying Enrel when my RD wanted to and even Arava, which was not yet
generic, cost us an additional $2000 out-of-pocket in an academic year.

After graduation, we moved to Michigan and had a year of Mike doing more
stuff for the ordination process.  Guess what - COBRA only applies if you are
on an employer managed plan.  Student health plans don't qualify.  That is
also true with excluding pre-existing condition clauses.  Our only option was
the last-resort insurance which only pays for services and hospilization, not
for office visits or meds (and Michigan's is better than most states).  I can
tell you, in southern Michigan at that time, new patient visits with doctors
ran $180-200 and established pt. visit were $90-100.  It adds up fast when
you have chronic illnesses - and we were paying the premiums on the last
resort insurance as well.  Fortunately, my mother was in a position to help
us out so we didn't have to go into our investments - and Mike did some
substitute teaching when he wasn't tied up with pre-ordination duties.  Is it
right that we should be put through this because Mike pursued a career
change?  Shouldn't we have at least had the option to buy into a decent
health plan?  And shouldn't my brother and his wife have that option as well?

We now have fairly good insurance through Mike's current position.  Still, in
2 years our premiums have increased by 30% while our set co-pays (office
visits and meds) have increased by 50% - all while our insurer has posted
record profits and has more than doubled their reserve funds to $2.8 BILLION.
This is not right - health care and health insurance shold be
not-for-profit, they should not be about increasing the shareholders
dividends!

And I truly believe we have a moral call to care for others in our society.  
Not everyone has the earning ability some of us have experienced.  For those
of you who profess to be Christian, let me remind you what Matthew 25:31-46
says, particularly vs. 40  "Truly I say to you, as you did it to one of the
least of these my brethern, you did it to me." (RSV)

Signature

Nann
remove the Gator cheer to email me
       Change everything. Love & forgive.

Kelly C. - 03 Apr 2008 23:38 GMT
((((M))))

I am going to selfishly and shamelessly beg you to move to the Willamette
Valley, so I can have a chance at hugging you in person.

Kelly C.

>> >   Originally posted in alt.support.cancer.prostate
>>
[quoted text clipped - 138 lines]
>
> m
BettyB - 04 Apr 2008 05:46 GMT
>((((M))))
>
>I am going to selfishly and shamelessly beg you to move to the Willamette
>Valley, so I can have a chance at hugging you in person.
>
>Kelly C.

An off topic question for you Kelly. Where in the Willamette Valley
are you? DH and I spent six years in Monroe, on Hwy 99W between Eugene
and Corvallis. We really liked it there but needed the money that DH
gets from working full time in Silicon Valley, CA.
--
BettyB  --  www.flamingo-code.com
"I have noticed even people who claim everything is
predestined, and that we can do nothing to change it,
look before they cross the road." - Stephen Hawking
Kelly C. - 04 Apr 2008 15:47 GMT
>>((((M))))
>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> predestined, and that we can do nothing to change it,
> look before they cross the road." - Stephen Hawking

Hi Betty, I was born and raised in Eugene, and now live in Salem. I am very
familiar with Monroe, and my mother lives on Hwy 99, midway between Junction
City and Eugene.

Howdy, neighbor!:)

Kelly C.
BettyB - 05 Apr 2008 02:35 GMT
>"BettyB" <bettyb1656@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> An off topic question for you Kelly. Where in the Willamette Valley
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
>Kelly C.

We really enjoyed being in Monroe. Coming from years in San Jose it
was something to know my neighbors. But no jobs. So we are back in San
Jose so DH can work and I am working with a wonderful personal trainer
at a Gold's Gym. Don't think I would be willing to give that up.
--
BettyB  --  www.flamingo-code.com
"I have noticed even people who claim everything is
predestined, and that we can do nothing to change it,
look before they cross the road." - Stephen Hawking
Harvey R. Stone - 03 Apr 2008 23:43 GMT
>> Considering all the other nations with health care as a right (just like
>> education), why do people keep trotting out the same old tired examples
[quoted text clipped - 82 lines]
>
> m

Well said,,,,,,  I am going to have to see how this plays out....   I know
that the USA,,, is in trouble as far as finances go and we may be going into
a serious recession.   We can not cover the promises of Soc. Sec to a
generation coming up.    Any of you that think a big change in our health
system is going to be free,,,, you need to look deeper.    The pendulum  of
the left and the right controlling what takes place with out government is
moving to the left which means that all of your hopes for health care may
come about.  I for one,,, am willing to give the change a fair chance  and
hope for the best with you.

Harv
Walt Hanks - 04 Apr 2008 00:41 GMT
I'm only going to say two things.

One: I have some of the best insurance available in the USA - Federal Blue
Cross - and I have already shelled out $2400 this year in co-pays.  That's
$800/month.  It is breaking me.

Second: "Single-payer" does not have to mean Federal Payer.  There are many
local single-payer models that work well.

Walt

>> >   Originally posted in alt.support.cancer.prostate
>>
[quoted text clipped - 138 lines]
>
> m
Califchief - 04 Apr 2008 07:00 GMT
Jayne wrote:

> I know how our system in the UK works though.  It isn't perfect, but
> its  better than it was a few years ago.  It costs us nothing extra.

Who pays for it?   Does Santa bring it each Christmas?

> I know we have to wait longer, but my longest wait was 6 months for
> my first knee replacement on the NHS.

And here's a Brit who is now dead because the NHS would not treat
him after he was diagnosed with cancer, until it was too late.

>>  Also: I'll remind folks of Hugh Kernley, who I miss with all my heart.
>>  He was *first* dxd with extensive metastases. He rarely saw the same
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>>  encouragement from this side of the pond, he managed to get radiation
>>  therapy for the mets. He told me that it worked wonders. But too late.


... Socialized medicine covers you from erection to resurrection!  
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12
Califchief - 04 Apr 2008 07:00 GMT
Ari wrote:

> Considering all the other nations with health care as a right
> (just like education), why do people keep trotting out the same
> old tired examples of the UK and Canada?  Still, if you cannot
> afford insurance, they're far better than you get in the US.

They're far better than in the US????????

Then why do so many snowbirds visit the U.S. for their medical
treatment?

Well, they don't want to wait 6, 8, 10 months for a doctor's
appointment, or a year or more for surgery.

That's because so many folks with "free," "it's a right" (your
terms) medical care head straight to an ER/ED for handnails,
scraped knees and runny noses, thus overloading the medical
profession.

I honestly believe you didn't read this portion of the quote....

> Here is a citation to a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada
> decision in Chaoulli v. Quebec (Attorney General), 2005 SCC 35,
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>   been *forbidden* to seek medical care outside the bounds of the
>   government-managed system.

> Also: I'll remind folks of Hugh Kernley, who I miss with all my
> heart. He was *first* dxd with extensive metastases. He rarely
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> to get radiation therapy for the mets. He told me that it worked
> wonders. But too late.

 
As a youth, I saw the same happening in military hospital ERs.
Dependents thought they had a "right" to use "free" medical
care in overcrowded ERs for acne, runny noses, warts, etc.

It's the same here today with hobos/freeloaders and wetbacks
in the U.S. who get "free" medical care in ERs.  Then bleeding
hearts weep when a wetback mother is deported with or without
her American-born child.

"Free" for them.....not for the American taxpayers who see
their wallets being emptied.
   

... Socialism is the equal distribution of poverty.    
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12
Califchief - 04 Apr 2008 07:00 GMT
Harvey wrote:

> I know that the USA,,, is in trouble as far as finances go and
> we may be going into a serious recession.   We can not cover
> the promises of Soc. Sec to a generation coming up.

What pyramid scheme/scam has ever been able to pay the tailend?

And Social Security is the ONLY legal pyramid scheme/scam in the
country.....relying on current wage earners -- except some exempt
government employees such as congress (they're exempt from all
laws) and the post office -- to buoy up the system with higher
and higher SS taxes.

Every individual who has attempted to operate a pyramid/ponzi
scheme it has served time in a federal "hotel."

The same has happened with Medicare -- higher and higher monthly
premiums out of our retirees' pocket - out of their monthly SS
check.

Those pushing for "free" health care have their heads up their
a.ses.  Who the hell do they believe is going to pay for it?

Have they looked at other countries where the tax rate is as
high as 80% of income?

Do they want the same here?

... My salad days wilted in the refrigerator.  
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12
Califchief - 05 Apr 2008 00:00 GMT
Kate wrote:

> the state won't pay for it, because he is on ssdi;

Someone lied to him.

A person on SSDI is entitled to Medicade (Medical in California),
even after his Medicare kicks in.  Medical will cover many things
that Medicare doesn't cover - hearing aids, eyeglasses, drugs.

... Inane sigline found.  (A)bort, (R)etry, (S)wipe a better one?
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12
Califchief - 06 Apr 2008 06:00 GMT
Thumper wrote to Harv:

>  Health care should be a right.  Not a privilege.


Can you find that clause in the Constitution?

Perhaps in the Bill of Rights?

That sounds exactly like the bleeding hears who shout
that wetbacks have a right to sneak across the border.
Everyone has a "right" to this and that and screw the
taxpaper who's left with the bill.

... Bigot: Anyone who's winning an argument with a liberal.
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12
Califchief - 06 Apr 2008 06:00 GMT
-=> Quoting Threecedars1@comcast2.net to All <=-

> no, chief.  you're horribly wrong.  i wish what you said were true
> for his sake.  but he lives in washington, not california where you
> live.  he has to spend down most of his ssdi check on medical care
> before the state (medicaid) will pick up anything for him and they
> don't care what his rent is or food or gas or anything like that.

Medicade has a cap on income.

From a person's income, they are supposed to subtract rent, gas,
electricity, phone, transportation to medical appointments, and
a couple of other things I can't remember.

Someone in Washington is flat out lying to him.

Usually to keep the welfare budget down, they reject white males by
lying to them (not expecting them to file an appeal) and pamper the
minority whores who keep popping babies out every 12 to 18 months.

... Socialism is the equal distribution of poverty.
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12
Califchief - 06 Apr 2008 06:00 GMT
Thumper skirted a the bush to avoid answering this question:

>>> I know how our system in the UK works though. It isn't perfect, but
>>> its better than it was a few years ago.  It costs us nothing extra.

>> Who pays for it?   Does Santa bring it each Christmas?

> Who pays for the 5 year Iraq war?
> Thumper

Why did you evade the question?  Does the answer hurt?

___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12
Califchief - 06 Apr 2008 06:00 GMT
Thumper failed to respond to this:

>> And here's a Brit who is now dead because the NHS would not treat
>> him after he was diagnosed with cancer, until it was too late.

>>  Also: I'll remind folks of Hugh Kernley, who I miss with all my heart.
>>  He was *first* dxd with extensive metastases. He rarely saw the same
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>>  encouragement from this side of the pond, he managed to get radiation
>>  therapy for the mets. He told me that it worked wonders. But too late.

Yep, the epitome of "free", socialized, government health care.

... Annoy a liberal - think for yourself!
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12
Califchief - 06 Apr 2008 06:00 GMT
Harv wrote:

> I do not know what a f#$%wit is but it seems to be
> something you know alot about.

That's a Canadian word Ari learned from numbnuts tommy.

... Liberal: An intellectual with both feet firmly planted in mid-air.
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12
Califchief - 06 Apr 2008 06:00 GMT
Harv stated:

>>> the changes taking place and make the best of it.   Soc.Med
>>> has not really worked anywhere in the world.

And Ari pounded out on the keyboard:

>> Spoken like a truly ignorant fuckwit.

To which Harv replied:

> Spoken like a good liberal,,, if you can not contriute,,,, you
> can always  call names.

Yeah, Ari learned good from numbnuts tommy.

... Liberal: a person whose interests aren't at stake, yet.
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12
Califchief - 06 Apr 2008 06:00 GMT
Thumper asked:

> How many people here take advantage of the great socialized
> medicine, MEDICARE?

Anyone on SSDI or over 65 should be.  That's the socialize
program created by JFK with mandatory withholdings from
pay checks.

If you work for reported wages, you have to pay; there's no
choice to opt out.

And like OASDI taxes with wage earners, Medicare has had to
raise and raise and raise the monthly insurance premium of
those on limited, fixed incomes.

If a certain candidate for president wins and raises taxes 2 or
3 times as promised, we'll see income taxes soar to 66% to 99%.

... My
...       ..-"""""-..               ..-"""""-..
...    .'    ___    '.           .'    ___    '.
...   /    ."\  `\    \         /    ."\  `\    \
...  ;    /, (    |    ;       ;    /, (    |    ;
... ;    /_   '._ /     ;     ;    /_   '._ /     ;
... |     |-  '._`)     |     |     |-  '._`)     |
... ;     '-;-'  \      ;     ;     '-;-'  \      ;
...  ; """" /    \\    ;       ; """" /    \\    ;
...   \    '.__..-'   /         \    '.__..-'   /
...    '._ 2 0 0 1 _.'           '._ 2 0 0 1 _.'
...       ""-----""                 ""-----""
... worth.  
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12
Califchief - 07 Apr 2008 07:00 GMT
Thumper wrote:

> Secondly it's the insurance companies that drive doctors into
> partnerships.  It's the only way they can afford the staff it
> takes to deal with all the red tape that various insurance
> companies put them through.

If you think red tape from insurance companies is bad, wait 'til
you get your socialized medicine and learn how inept Uncle Sam is.

Doctors and pharmacists are quitting because of all the red tape
produced by Medicare, Medicade, and other socialistic programs.

... Seize no evil, ears no evil, and nose no evil.
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12
Califchief - 07 Apr 2008 07:00 GMT
Kate wrote:

> as walt indicated on a separate thread, not all of the
> proposed universal health care plans depend upon taxation.

Who/what is going to pay for those proposed plans?

Has someone finally learned how to grow money on trees?

... Don't just stand there before me.....KNEEL!
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.