Kelly wrote:
> I must be using the wrong kind of calculator. This doesn't seem
> to work well with a 10-key. Or, maybe it's just me.lol
You, and Walt, and me. <g> It displayed the prefix, but
the four digit phone number was incorrect.
... This offer void except where prohibited by law.
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12
Kelly C. - 16 Mar 2008 05:30 GMT
> Kelly wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> You, and Walt, and me. <g> It displayed the prefix, but
> the four digit phone number was incorrect.
Thanks, Chief. Same here.
Maybe I'll try it again, if I can be bothered to find our regular little
calculator.lol
Kelly C.
ziggy - 16 Mar 2008 11:32 GMT
The first time I did it I came up with the wrong answer because I added the
last four digits of my number individually instead of collectively. 6+9+0+5
instead of +6905. then it worked correctly.
Z
> Kelly wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> ... This offer void except where prohibited by law.
> ___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12
Califchief - 17 Mar 2008 00:00 GMT
> The first time I did it I came up with the wrong answer because I
> added the last four digits of my number individually instead of
> collectively. 6+9+0+5 instead of +6905. then it worked correctly.
I bet that's what I also did, because the answer came out "low."
... Proper English grammar is when you say gender instead of sex.
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12