Allergy research giving weight to hygiene theory
By Rob Stein
THE WASHINGTON POST
March 4, 2008
First, asthma cases shot up, along with hay fever and other common
allergic reactions, such as eczema. Then pediatricians started seeing
more children with food allergies. Now experts are increasingly
convinced that a suspected jump in lupus, multiple sclerosis and other
afflictions caused by misfiring immune systems is real.
Although the data are stronger for some diseases than others, and part
of the increase may reflect better diagnoses, experts estimate that many
allergies and immune-system diseases have doubled, tripled or even
quadrupled in the past few decades, depending on the ailment and the
country. Some studies now indicate that more than half of the U.S.
population has at least one allergy.
The cause remains the focus of intense debate and study, but some
researchers suspect the concurrent trends all may have a common
explanation rooted in aspects of modern living ? including the ?hygiene
hypothesis? that blames growing up in increasingly sterile homes,
changes in diet, air pollution, and possibly even obesity and
increasingly sedentary lifestyles.
"We have dramatically changed our lives in the last 50 years," said
Fernando Martinez, who studies allergies at the University of Arizona.
"We are exposed to more products. We have people with different
backgrounds being exposed to different environments. We have made our
lives more antiseptic, especially early in life. Our immune systems may
grow differently as a result. And we may be paying a price for that."
Along with a flurry of research to confirm and explain the trends,
scientists have also begun testing possible remedies. Some are feeding
high-risk children gradually larger amounts of allergy-inducing foods,
hoping to train the immune system not to overreact. Others are testing
benign bacteria or parts of bacteria. Still others have patients with
MS, colitis and related ailments swallow harmless parasitic worms to try
to calm their bodies' misdirected defenses.
"If you look at the incidence of these diseases, a lot of them began to
emerge and become much more common after parasitic worm diseases were
eliminated from our environment," said Robert Summers of the University
of Iowa, who is experimenting with whipworms. "We believe they have a
profound symbiotic effect on developing and maintaining the immune
system."
Although hay fever, eczema, asthma and food allergies seem quite
different, they are all "allergic diseases" because they are caused by
the immune system responding to substances that are ordinarily benign,
such as pollen or peanuts. Autoimmune diseases also result from the
body's defense mechanisms malfunctioning. But in these diseases, which
include lupus, MS, Type 1 diabetes and inflammatory bowel disease, the
immune system attacks parts of the body such as nerves, the pancreas or
digestive tract.
"Overall, there is very little doubt that we have seen significant
increases," said Syed Hasan Arshad of the David Hide Asthma and Allergy
Research Centre in England, who focuses on food allergies. "You can call
it an epidemic. We're talking about millions of people and huge
implications, both for health costs and quality of life. People miss
work. Severe asthma can kill. Peanut allergies can kill. It does have
huge implications all around. If it keeps increasing, where will it
end?"
One reason that many researchers suspect something about modern living
is to blame is that the increases show up largely in highly developed
countries in Europe, North America and elsewhere, and have only started
to rise in other countries as they have become more developed.
"It's striking," said William Cookson of the Imperial College in London.
The leading theory holds that as modern medicine beats back bacterial,
viral and parasitic diseases, immune systems may fail to learn how to
differentiate between real threats and benign invaders, such as ragweed
pollen or food. Or perhaps because they are not busy fighting real
threats, they overreact or even turn on the body's own tissues.
"Our immune systems are much less busy," said Jean-Francois Bach of the
French Academy of Sciences, "and so have much more strong responses to
much weaker stimuli, triggering allergies and autoimmune diseases."
Several lines of evidence support the theory. Children raised with pets
or older siblings are less likely to develop allergies, possibly because
they are exposed to more microbes. But perhaps the strongest evidence
comes from studies comparing thousands of people who grew up on farms in
Europe with those who lived in less-rural settings. Those reared on
farms were one-tenth as likely to develop diseases such as asthma and
hay fever.
"The data are very strong," said Erika von Mutius of Ludwig-Maximilians
University in Munich. "If kids have all sorts of exposures on the farm
by being in the stables a lot, close to the animals and the grasses, and
drinking cow's milk from their own farm, that seems to confer protection."
While the evidence for the hygiene theory is accumulating, some say it
remains far from proven.
"That theory is so full of holes that it's clearly not the whole story,"
said Robert Wood of the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine.
It does not explain, for example, the rise in asthma, since that disease
occurs much more commonly in poor, inner-city areas where children are
exposed to more cockroaches and rodents that may trigger it, Wood and
others said.
Several alternative theories have been presented. Some researchers blame
exposure to fine particles in air pollution, which may give the immune
system more of a hair trigger, especially in genetically predisposed
individuals. Others say obesity and a sedentary lifestyle may play a
role. Still others wonder whether eating more processed food or foods
processed in different ways, or changes in the balance of certain
vitamins that can affect the immune system, such as vitamins C and E
and fish oil, are a factor.
But many researchers believe the hygiene hypothesis is the strongest.
Some have begun to try to identify specific genes that may be involved,
as well as specific components of bacteria or other pathogens that might
be used to train immune systems to respond appropriately.
"If we could mimic what is happening in these farm environments," von
Mutius said, "we could protect children and prevent asthma, allergies
and other diseases."
... Nickel: Once good for getting the wrong number with.
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12
spodosaurus - 05 Mar 2008 11:33 GMT
> Allergy research giving weight to hygiene theory
> By Rob Stein
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> changes in diet, air pollution, and possibly even obesity and
> increasingly sedentary lifestyles.
I'd be looking at obesity more closely. When the membrane fats change
due to poor diet it makes the cell look different to immune regulators.
Cells can appear apoptotic or pre-apoptotic and if you get enough of
these in one area, you may increase your odds of having an immune
response against that tissue. If obesity and diet (like REALLY bad diet)
are implicated, I'd be looking in that direction.
Regarding the hygiene hypothesis, it seems pretty crap considering all
these antibacterial soaps are no more antibacterial than regular soap...
Kids are still eating dirt and coughing all over each other. If homes
were really that sterile, leukaemia patients wouldn't have to be kept in
isolation rooms after transplant.
I'd also be having a stronger look at air pollution. Particularly the
increasing concentrations of odd hydrocarbons that in certain people
(see the multifactorial inheritance model and disease) can move the
boundary between no illness and a disease state given their allotment of
alleles that can contribute to a disease state.
Ari

Signature
spammage trappage: remove the underscores to reply
Many people around the world are waiting for a marrow transplant. Please
volunteer to be a marrow donor and literally save someone's life:
http://www.abmdr.org.au/
http://www.marrow.org/
Navy - 05 Mar 2008 21:07 GMT
I have read that many of the children today become sick as adults because of
the "sterilization" of the childhood environment. It seems like so many of
the ads on TV recommend the parent following the child around with a
antibacterial product, wiping every surface the child may touch. My boys
were not raised that way and are quite healthy adults. I wasn't either, and
can't blame the arthritis on that. I'm just wearing out sooner than the
warranty said I would. (No rose garden here, either.)

Signature
Navy
Take out the FISH to email me.
> Allergy research giving weight to hygiene theory
> By Rob Stein
[quoted text clipped - 123 lines]
> ... Nickel: Once good for getting the wrong number with.
> ___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12
Nann Bell - 06 Mar 2008 04:48 GMT
I, too, would vote for pollution being the main contributor. Frankly, most
folks don't live in THAT sterile of an environment, though they encounter
fewer of the major illness bugs. That also means that many historical
natural selection processes have been taken out of the equation, so more of
us are living long enough to reveal these problems. I know I'm not the only
one here who wouldn't be alive today if I'd been born 60 years earlier.
There may also be a factor of more people actually finding out and seeking
treatment for their symptoms. The DH knew his eyes were sensitive to
pollution and chemicals, but didn't realize he has some mild dust and pollen
allergies until I figured out his headaches were sinus ones.
There are still those of us with solid family histories out there though - my
mom's dad was rousted out of the Navy because of his allergies and sinus
problems in the early 20s (after they did surgery on the sinuses) and my
father's mother had RA. The corresponding parent inherited the ills and
passed on the genetic glitch.

Signature
Nann
remove the Gator cheer to email me
Simply the thing I am shall make me live --- William Shakespeare