>> Well. my computer told me there was an IE update available...
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Bud
On Dec 9, 3:33 am, "drewanddawn2004" <drewanddawn2...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> Well, a friend finally suggested that I go to CONTROL PANEL and then
> ADD/REMOVE PROGRAMS and UNinstall Internet Explorer 7.... and that I would
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> > Have a happy.
What on earth are you still using IE 6 for?
Good grief!
Here, get a life:
http://www.mozilla-europe.org/en/products/firefox/
http://www.opera.com/download/
drewanddawn2004 - 10 Dec 2007 15:12 GMT
> What on earth are you still using IE 6 for?
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> http://www.mozilla-europe.org/en/products/firefox/
> http://www.opera.com/download/
I * Like * IE 6.... and as long as i can use it, I dont feel the need nor
energy
to change to something else.... maybe in the future.
tks~ Kim
Weatherlawyer - 10 Dec 2007 20:12 GMT
[quote="steviex"]Uninstalling IE is NOT a good idea, as it is very
tightly integrated with Windows, and will cripple it if removed.[/
quote]
I believe I have a reverse order problem. I have a PC that screws up
with Microsoft Office installed. The Pre-Service-pack programme and
ditto XP OS were OK at one time, it just got worse and worse as the
updates bloated everything.
2 good reasons for not having IE:
[quote]
[1.] You NEED it for Windows Updates (Due to Active X in the Update
site)
[2.] Some sites just WILL NOT run on Firefox, due to Active X VB
Script, or just poor coding
With IE, the best thing to do is to Firewall it until you need your
head examined....[/quote]
Don't get me wrong, I love XP and would like to be able to use Office
once again but the trouble with Microsoft products is that none of
them work well together and Windows just isn't Internet Ready.
Weatherlawyer - 11 Dec 2007 03:10 GMT
> [quote="steviex"]Uninstalling IE is NOT a good idea, as it is very
> tightly integrated with Windows, and will cripple it if removed.[/
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> once again but the trouble with Microsoft products is that none of
> them work well together and Windows just isn't Internet Ready.
I forgot the link:
http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?p=3176817#3176817
Sorry.
Weatherlawyer - 11 Dec 2007 03:28 GMT
This is the first, albeit pointless, piece of genuine information
about the next version IE to come from Microsoft despite a sustained
barrage of protest from developers throughout 2007. They want answers
to questions such as: "Will it comply with web standards?" and: "Will
it be compatible with CSS?"
http://www.regdeveloper.co.uk/2007/12/10/gates_ie8_fire_drill/
What do you suppose, from this rather pointless discussion?
That Internet Explorer is finally going to put right all the faults it
has induced in the co-operative network of international computer
servers called the Internet?
Or more of the same old sludge?
If Microsoft had it's way then all computer development would depend
on coders working on code bases they cannot see. I am not advocating
Open Source, just explaining the obvious.
On this forum, most posters live day to day with much worse things
wrong in their lives than piddling interoperability problems with
computer operating systems.
But it seems to me that having saddled the world with computer bloat,
piracy issues and major bugs, they aught to do their best to make sure
Windows users are less subject to computing problems than most other
system users.
Doesn't that make sense?