Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Arthritis / May 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Weekly Health News 4/9

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Califchief - 16 May 2007 02:49 GMT
Disintegration test for pills a good match for stomach conditions

QUESTION: I was diagnosed with osteoporosis several years ago. I take once-monthly Boniva, drink milk and take a calcium supplement.

However, my doctor said that recent tests show I'm still rapidly losing bone. He said to take a vitamin D-3 supplement to help calcium absorption.

I read that a pill dropped into a small amount of vinegar should dissolve within 30 minutes. When I tried it with my calcium supplement, only about half the pill dissolved after a full hour.

Does this mean my calcium pills are not being properly absorbed into my body?

ANSWER: Probably not. All calcium products analyzed by ConsumerLab.com, an independent testing company, were found to disintegrate (break apart) properly so they could dissolve and be absorbed.

You're right not to be too trusting, though. ConsumerLab.com has found disintegration problems with other dietary supplement
products.

The company provides the following unofficial disintegration test for do-it-yourselfers. It's not foolproof, but it matches conditions in the stomach much better than the test you used.

Heat 1/2 cup of vinegar (acetic acid) in a heat-safe cup on the hot-plate portion of a coffee machine to 98.6 degrees F (body temperature). For a quick check of the temperature, use an instant-read thermometer, and don't allow it to rest on the bottom
of the cup where heat is most intense, giving a false reading.

Place a pill in the cup, then stir continuously for 30 to 45 minutes, without hitting the pill and keeping the temperature near 98.6 degrees F. If necessary, move the cup on and off the heat to maintain a constant temperature.

Uncoated or thinly coated products should disintegrate in about 30 minutes; gelatin-coated and hard-coated products may require the full time.

Note: This test may not work with "time-release" or "sustained-release" products. And be aware that "chewable" products are meant to be broken down by chewing and "enteric-coated" products should not fully break apart in this test because they are
designed to release their ingredients farther down the digestive tract.

As your doctor said, adequate vitamin D is required for proper calcium absorption.

The vitamin D-3 (cholecalciferol) he recommended is the most active form.

Some vitamin D-fortified food products and multivitamins provide vitamin D-2 (ergocalciferol).

Most people may need higher amounts than previously thought - at least 800 to 1,000 IU of vitamin D-3 daily.

People who are deficient in vitamin D will need much larger doses for several weeks to replenish their vitamin D body stores.

In light of recent research, some experts say we should consider raising the recommended daily amounts for vitamin D and lowering those for calcium.

When vitamin D levels are optimal, the body needs less calcium.

Unless there are other issues involved, Boniva combined with adequate vitamin D and calcium should stop bone loss and boost bone density.

Besides once-monthly Boniva, other prescription bone builders include once-weekly Actonel and Fosamax. Users of these products will be interested in the latest news: Pills that need to be taken only once a year are now wending their way through the FDA
pipeline.

Richard Harkness is a consultant pharmacist, a natural medicines specialist and the author of eight books. Write him at 1224 King Henry Drive, Ocean Springs, MS 39564.

___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12
swabymanor@googlemail.com - 17 May 2007 11:38 GMT
> SomevitaminD-fortified food products and multivitamins providevitaminD-2 (ergocalciferol).

The case against ergocalciferol (vitamin D2) as a vitamin supplement
is set out here, http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/full/84/4/694
it concludes "the public expects to derive the equivalent effect per
unit dose of vitamin D, whether it is vitamin D2 or vitamin D3. The
scientific community is aware that these molecules are not equivalent.
Therefore, vitamin D2 should no longer be regarded as a nutrient
appropriate for supplementation or fortification of foods."

> Most people may need higher amounts than previously thought - at least 800 to 1,000 IU ofvitaminD-3 daily.

While 800-1000iu would be a useful amount to use where an individual
is getting regular full body exposure to midday sunshine for around
20-40 minutes it will not meet the indoor dwellers daily need. See
http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/full/77/1/204 Human serum 25-
hydroxycholecalciferol response to extended oral dosing with
cholecalciferol " Healthy men seem to use 3000-5000 IU cholecalciferol/
d"
In other research he shows that outdoor workers only obtain  2800 IU/d
from sunlight (you don't often see a farmer, gardener, groundsman etc
working in the nude)  which while combined with fortified foods, will
be sufficient to sustain vitamin d status through the Summer, it is
not sufficient to provide adequate stores for the Winter.

> People who are deficient invitaminD will need much larger doses for several weeks to replenish theirvitaminDbody stores.

http://www.vitamindcouncil.com/ have a links page to a range of high
strength vitamin d suppliers. Because the half life of Vitamin d is
measured in weeks it is OK to take large amounts and average that
amount over several days, so taking 3 x 5000iu = 2100iu daily over 7
days
4 x 5000iu = 20,000weekly = 2857iu daily  5 x 5000iu =25000weekly =
3571iu daily It really depends on how good you are at remembering to
take them. If once a week is the best you can do it will make no
difference in the long run.

> In light of recent research, some experts say we should consider raising the recommended daily amounts forvitaminDand lowering those for calcium.

Glad to hear someone else voice that opinion. Looking at the
foodsources for Calcium http://www.whfoods.com/genpage.php?tname=nutrient&dbid=45#summary
I'm surprised that people need a supplement. I also think Magnesium is
an underated player in the metabolic play off between calcium/vit d/
magnesium.

> When vitaminDlevels are optimal, the body needs less calcium.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=Abstra
ctPlus&list_uids=17218096

Circulating vitamin D3 and 25-hydroxyvitamin D in humans: An important
tool to define adequate nutritional vitamin D status. When humans are
sun (or dietary) replete, the vitamin D endocrine system will function
in a fashion as do these other steroid synthetic pathways, not limited
by substrate. Thus, the relationship between circulating vitamin D and
25(OH)D may represent what "normal" vitamin D status should be.

This appears to be 100nmol/L somewhat higher than the 75-80nmol/L
previously thought to be optimal status.

Anyone concerned about the implications of higher rates of Vitamin d3
Cholecalciferol use needs to read http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/full/85/1/6
Risk assessment for vitamin D by John N Hathcock, Andrew Shao,
Reinhold Vieth and Robert Heaney
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.