 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Arthritis / November 2006Dont Pay OJ blood money
http://www.dontpayoj.com/ > http://www.dontpayoj.com/ The fact you would post this here makes me want to rush out and buy a copy of his book. If I remember correctly the criminal jury came back with a not guilty verdict. >> http://www.dontpayoj.com/ > > The fact you would post this here makes me want to rush out and buy a copy > of his book. If I remember correctly the criminal jury came back with a > not guilty verdict. And that says a great deal about you as you join Calf. juries and judges........ Harv Nobodys gonna pay any money for the book as the book deal has been cancelled and all books have been recalled and are to be destroyed! His television show is also cancelled! . . . Donna G. . . . ANGELS EXIST, but some times, since they don't all have wings, we call them FRIENDS...... click, click, click.....those are my shoes doing a happy dance! ;-) Nanny > Nobodys gonna pay any money for the book as the book deal has been > cancelled and all books have been recalled and are to be destroyed! [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > ANGELS EXIST, but some times, since they don't all have wings, we call > them FRIENDS...... I know, I followed the trial every day of its duration. I cried at the verdict! Just because the jury says "not guilty", doesn't mean he isn't. Nanny >> http://www.dontpayoj.com/ > > The fact you would post this here makes me want to rush out and buy a copy > of his book. If I remember correctly the criminal jury came back with a > not guilty verdict. > http://www.dontpayoj.com/ I thought OJ was found not guilty? Are we trying to rewrite history now? Nobody has any proof that OJ committed those murders. The evidence and investigation was so poorly done, nobody can say for sure if he did it. It's only wild speculation by those who didn't sit through the case and examine the evidence and testimony. John >>http://www.dontpayoj.com/ > > I thought OJ was found not guilty? In reality, he wound up with the Scottish verdict, "Not proven." There were not many who sincerely believed he didn't do it, least of all his own defense attorney, the late great Johnnie Cochran who didn't become rich by being stupid. He was never off the hook. He was after all successfully sued by relatives of Ron Goldman claiming wrongful death. I guess in Scotland, a complete acquittal means that a dozen people say they can't see that the defendant is guilty as charged, and that's the legal end of the matter. In other English common law countries including this one, there's the stigma of "Well, he did beat the rap, but..." >>>http://www.dontpayoj.com/ >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > He was never off the hook. He was after all successfully sued by > relatives of Ron Goldman claiming wrongful death. Yes he was, at a second trial for the same crime. That is called double jeopardy. Do you think everyone that gets a NOT GUILTY verdict in court should be tried over and over till a guilty verdict is returned? Don't you think a civil trail for financial remuneration for a criminal offence should be restricted to guilty people. The jury was not a hung jury in the criminal case. If it had been a new trial could have been facilitated. He was found NOT GUILTY! That should have ended it. I was once charged with a serious crime and the case was dismissed without a trial when I proved I was innocent. I have since, at my own expense, had to prove that case was dismissed and I was innocent twice. This has cost me thousands of dollars. In my case no crime was committed and the party that claimed it had was advised to leave the state or face charges for filing false reports. I am not allowed to go after that person to recover my expenses even though the lies of that person have cost me a lot of money. >>>> http://www.dontpayoj.com/ >>> [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > go after that person to recover my expenses even though the lies of > that person have cost me a lot of money. LIAR. > LIAR. Damn you didn't choke to death on your Thanksgiving donkey dick. :( Well; There is always your Christmas horse pecker to hope for. >> LIAR. > > Damn you didn't choke to death on your Thanksgiving donkey dick. :( > > Well; There is always your Christmas horse pecker to hope for. Sorry feely. You got there first and beat everyone to the dick you love so much. > Yes he was, at a second trial for the same crime. No he wasn't > That is called double jeopardy. Only in criminal cases. His second trial was in a civil court. Don't forget the cops in the King beating were found not guilty in a criminal trial, but convicted in a federal civil rights trial. Or maybe you thing a different standard should apply to white cops than to a black ex-football player. .. If ignorance is bliss, why aren't more people happy? >> Yes he was, at a second trial for the same crime. > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > .. If ignorance is bliss, why aren't more people happy? Because if it was you would have died of laughter long ago. Chief and others, as I said before, I followed OJ's murder trial daily, so I was really aware of all the evidence, racial problems, and ego problems of a couple of OJ's lawyers. The overwhelming DNA evidence of OJ's blood found in several places in and around the crime scene and his estate, convinced me. It was something like this: with the results of the blood analysis, the chances of OJ NOT being guilty were something like 1 in one trillion. The public can be a courtroom as well, and we're seeing signs now of the backlash to the brutal murderer who thought he got away with it. A lot of people don't forget, and I'm one of them. Nanny >> Yes he was, at a second trial for the same crime. > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > .. If ignorance is bliss, why aren't more people happy? > http://www.dontpayoj.com/ I thought OJ was found not guilty? Are we trying to rewrite history now? Nobody has any proof that OJ committed those murders. The evidence and investigation was so poorly done, nobody can say for sure if he did it. It's only wild speculation by those who didn't sit through the case and examine the evidence and testimony. John Yeah...found innocent by a mostly black jury that was predispositioned to judge him innocent from the word go. Why not invite him over to YOUR house this Christmas? He'll carve the turkey. >> http://www.dontpayoj.com/ > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > >John That's right, bro, keep the faith. OJ didn't do it and I can prove it: 1) He said he didn't do it. 2) He's out looking for the "real" killers. And that settles that! |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.