Wearing bifocals at almost 42....hard to get used to the "line".
Couldn't read small print close up without blurriness
Just got 'em this morning.
My parish priest Father Jim has no--line bifocals---Showed me
Stinkweed - 18 Jun 2006 03:34 GMT
I have tri-focals, so I have 3 levels to see out of and sometimes it gets
confusing. I just move my head to see which works. But mostly I
automatically go to the one I need and I'm sure you will too in time.
> Wearing bifocals at almost 42....hard to get used to the "line".
> Couldn't read small print close up without blurriness
>
> Just got 'em this morning.
>
> My parish priest Father Jim has no--line bifocals---Showed me
Bonnie Brien - 19 Jun 2006 16:23 GMT
Have you converted old frames (to your new prescription lens) As a spare
set of glasses??
I must wear mine all the time--as legally blind without them ans
shouldn't be without glasses. should an accident happen
Have YOU done the same thing?
Cost: $109.00 (I have my old frames).
Bonnie
Nann Bell - 20 Jun 2006 02:08 GMT
what I did was get my distance prescription put in my old frames. That way I
CAN use them when something happens to my "good" glasses - I'm safe to drive
and get around in general, just can't read the newspaper with them on.
Single prescription lenses are so much less expensive than bifocals, I didn't
want to pay for bifocal lenses that I'd almost never use. This was a good
compromise for me.
My previous backup, now really old frames, still have my prior distance
prescription in them. I've been thinking about getting computer or sewing or
reading lenses in them, but haven't followed through on it yet.

Signature
Nann
remove the Gator cheer to email me
Simply the thing I am shall make me live --- William Shakespeare
> Have you converted old frames (to your new prescription lens) As a spare
> set of glasses??
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Bonnie
Bonnie Brien - 20 Jun 2006 03:33 GMT
my old frames are only 2 yrs. old.....
That way I can switch off, to keep the new ones lookin' new
Don Kirkman - 18 Jun 2006 08:49 GMT
It seems to me I heard somewhere that Bonnie Brien wrote in article
<17480-4494AF75-459@storefull-3154.bay.webtv.net>:
>Wearing bifocals at almost 42....hard to get used to the "line".
>Couldn't read small print close up without blurriness
>Just got 'em this morning.
>My parish priest Father Jim has no--line bifocals---Showed me
I changed to continuous-curve (no-line) lenses as soon as I could,
several years ago, and never want to go back. Unfortunately the extra
cost isn't covered by my insurance but I'm glad to pay out of pocket.
YMMV :-)

Signature
Don Kirkman
GARY Z - 18 Jun 2006 12:45 GMT
> Wearing bifocals at almost 42....hard to get used to the "line".
> Couldn't read small print close up without blurriness
>
> Just got 'em this morning.
>
> My parish priest Father Jim has no--line bifocals---Showed me
Hi Bonnie,
On the other side.....
I had lineless trifocals and actually hated them. Couldn't handle trifocals
period. Went to bifocal and separate reading glasses. Pain in the rear
having to change, but better than tri's. Also switched to lined bifocal and
did better with them than lineless. They can vary the height of the lower
reading portion and I had them make mine very small. The line was no problem
after that as it wasn't in my upper area of vision. About 2 yrs ago I had
the Lasik procedure done and had fantastic results! I still need 1.25x
magnifiers for reading due to macular degeneration . I'm 56 so this is
normal. These glasses can be bought as cheaply as $3 a pair. If the line is
in your normal vision area have them adjust the lens to a lower bifocal
point.
GaryZ
debbie m - 18 Jun 2006 18:54 GMT
Bonnie,
I started wearing bifocals at an early age also. I have always used
the lined. However, like Gary suggested I "love" the bifocal line very
small so it is not in my normal vision. They always say you don't want
it that low and then I say "Yes, I do." It works for me. I like it to
hit about the bottom of my eyelid when my head is held up straight.
You will learn what works for you.
My friend has the no line and he takes his off all the time to read.
He has never done well with them. It does take a while so don't give
up. Good luck!
debbie m.
> Wearing bifocals at almost 42....hard to get used to the "line".
> Couldn't read small print close up without blurriness
>
> Just got 'em this morning.
>
> My parish priest Father Jim has no--line bifocals---Showed me
Norman - 18 Jun 2006 20:18 GMT
I found that the "continuous curve" (or "lineless") reduced the actual reading
area because of the amount of glass area needed to bend the two magnifications.
As a technician, I needed as much close-up area as I could get so I didn't have
to keep moving my head to keep everything in focus. I did purchase a pair of
clip-on magnifiers which turn my distance area into a reading area, and my
reading area into a close-up area. They're good for extreme work.
One time I was installing some phone jacks in my girlfriend's house and I had
to lay on my side to install a jack in a tight corner. To see what I was doing,
I put my glasses on upside down so I could look "up" and still be able to make
the connections.
I also had a pair of computer glasses made; they have a single magnification
set between my distance and reading settings. It lets me sit back and see my
screen without having to slide the glasses down to the tip of my nose.
Nothing works for everyone; and what does work for you may not work every time.
Such is life...
----------------------
mr-dot-bones-at-att-dot-net
"Should be" and "Is" rarely agree.
Nann Bell - 19 Jun 2006 20:14 GMT
I have progressive (no line) bifocals. I decided to try them because I do a
lot of sewing and I thought it would be good to have the "middle range"
adjustment for that. My brother says he liked progressives for his first
pair of bifocals, but when his reading lenses got stronger he couldn't stand
them at all. he now wears the traditional bifocals and has a separate pair
of glasses for computer work (he's a software consultant).
Still, they told me it would take a week to get used to even the
progressives. My first ones drove me absolutely nuts. After a week I went
back and told them things seemed to be set too high. They made me another
pair of lenses under their warranty and the second pair were a breeze. When
I later changed frames and got new lenses again, they were fine too. So....
give it a while to adjust, but if it isn't getting better in a week or two,
go back to the place where you got the glasses!

Signature
Nann
remove the Gator cheer to email me
Simply the thing I am shall make me live --- William Shakespeare
Bonnie Brien - 19 Jun 2006 22:07 GMT
Yes --
I did take my old glasses to be fitted with new bifocal prescription
lenses--so I can't 'cheat."
My eyes wll have to adjust
Should have them in several days......
Adelle - 20 Jun 2006 16:07 GMT
>I have progressive (no line) bifocals. I decided to try them because I do
>a
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> two,
> go back to the place where you got the glasses!
My ophthalmologist says that adjusting to no line is very hard if your up
close number is higher than x (can't remember the exact x).
I'm at 1.25 and she said now would be a good time to do the progressives
because if it gets too much higher, then it tends to induce vertigo/
dizziness and such.
Adelle
Bonnie Brien - 24 Jun 2006 04:14 GMT
Got my old (wire) frames back and they are fitted with the new script
and bifocal too--can't cheat!
There ain''t no way I'm going back to plastic frames. Can't be without
my glasses at all
Bonnie
Bonnie Brien - 25 Jun 2006 23:19 GMT
Father Jim mentioned getting "seasick" with bifocals??
How can u get seasick with eyeglasses??
Bonnie
Alice Faber - 25 Jun 2006 23:42 GMT
> Father Jim mentioned getting "seasick" with bifocals??
>
> How can u get seasick with eyeglasses??
If you have trouble getting used to the different focal lengths, that
can make you dizzy and disoriented. Some folks have no problems with
this (I'm one of them), but, apparently, if you have a problem, you
*really* have a problem. I think if you were one with a problem, you'd
know it!

Signature
AF
"Non Sequitur U has a really, really lousy debate team."
--artyw raises the bar on rec.sport.baseball
Bonnie Brien - 26 Jun 2006 01:02 GMT
That "line" in the lens is a pain in the @ss but it don't make me dizzy
Father Jim's got "no lines' maybe HE got seasick with his--but now he's
used to this--he likes his no lines. I gather HIS bifocals had lines at
one time
Bonnie
ladylove77 - 26 Jun 2006 19:34 GMT
I had no trouble at all getting used to bifocals or trifocals. Was just so
glad to be able to see at all distances.
Gwen
>> Father Jim mentioned getting "seasick" with bifocals??
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> *really* have a problem. I think if you were one with a problem, you'd
> know it!