Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Alzheimer's / August 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

I took a day off

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
J J - 05 Aug 2007 16:38 GMT
I took a day off from going to see mom, I went to the show and saw
hairspray but my mind was still on mom. I wish I could shake this guilty
feeling off. I have to stop thinking about it as my blood pressure is
high and potassium is very low. I didn't realize how much of a toll this
took on me.
I  hope mom will accept this soon. It would make it much more easier on
both of us ----I still am confused with the disease they say mom is just
really confused and diagnosed her with dementia.yet she doesn't eat much
but they keep her up all day to keep her stimulated. also they do not
give them much sweets either. I guess that agitates them or stimulates
them more.
JJ
Baird Stafford - 05 Aug 2007 17:19 GMT
> I took a day off from going to see mom, I went to the show and saw
> hairspray but my mind was still on mom. I wish I could shake this guilty
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> give them much sweets either. I guess that agitates them or stimulates
> them more.

The stimulation is meant to preserve her mind as much as possible:  like
other muscles, the brain grows flabby with disuse.  As for the sweets, I
suspect the reason for their non-appearance is that they have a mixed
population of diabetics and non-diabetics.  It would no more be kind to
hand out sweets in and ALF under those circumstances than it would be to
hand out sweets to some children in a classroom and not to others.

That being said, check with the ALF but I suspect they wouldn't object
in the least if you were to bring a pocketful of sweets for your mother
to dole out when you're private with her.  I used to take butterscotch
to the Dowager until she could no longer handle them, and then caramels
until those, too, became too dangerous because she might aspirate the
"thin liquids" produced by chewing the candies.  The two of us would go
out to the front porch of the ALF to watch the world go by (and to keep
from raising jealousy among the other residents) and she could have her
goodies in privacy.

Blessed be,
Baird
stopalz@gmail.com - 15 Aug 2007 18:06 GMT
> In article <520-46B5EEFF-...@storefull-3212.bay.webtv.net>,
>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> Blessed be,
> Baird

The better stimulation are on those that they have in their brains, as
satisfactory life events. This is based on the following alternative
theory:
THE ALTERNATIVE ALZHEIMER?S THEORY
DIFFUSION TEXT
ALZHEIMER PROJECT ARGENTINE,
AUGUST 2007

The Chronic Progressive Dementization, (CPD), the scientific name of
that vulgarly called alzheimer, is a quite different question than
depression, different types of psychosis and obviously of sometimes
surprising behaviors of the normal aging, and in the long run much
more serious.
Although the final phase of cerebral disintegration is similar, there
are two types of processes: the one that occurs in young adults or
greater adults, and another different one that it happens in very
greater adults, around 80 years or more. In these, at the final phase
the problem it is "simply" the loss of the vital motivation, the
exhaustion of desire to continue living. Abandonment of dreams, as
Miguel de Unamuno would say on the cession of such dreams that Don
Quixote in favor of Sancho did, and then, obviously, dying.
Persons with risk for a CPD (alzheimer) are those that generally have
an introverted personality, few and restricted social relations, with
and isolation tendency, coping deficit for difficulties and losses,
tendency to depend on others, to had constructed their personal
identity in the shade of another one (the woman of the doctor, the
husband of...) or some other equivalent transference, tendency to be
obstinate to proper painful events or of the other's life, which is
diagnosed in general like depression.
THEN, IN ANY WAY IT TOUCHES TO ANYONE.
There is nothing of chance's dependence, neither suddenly nor no
magician in it. Logically with advance into years the probability that
these people suffer a painful loss increases, obviously, like
everybody. With its coping deficit the risk increases enormously when
they have a painful loss, for example her husband who gave or lent the
personal identity, or a son or daughter who gave sense to their life,
of their work that justified the existence to him, of their corporal
and mental capacity to which he had bet or concentrated, and when not
counting on a familiar network and a social network that stopped its
fall after the duel impossible to elaborate and to go on, the person
collapses.
It is the beginning of the aim. It can have 40 years old (the younger
case than we have was a woman of 38 years), or 80 yo. It does not
related to aging, but only that when they advance the years is more
probable that we suffer painful losses. Until this moment its brain is
totally normal, does not show absolutely anything abnormal and is
totally useless to want to see something in images or less even in
electroencephalograms, that it is something so coarse and inadequate
as a toad arrives of a luxurious piano of tail.
The landslide of the person, its "delivery" as much in the dictionary
of the Real Spanish Academy like in the original dictionaries of all
the languages, is expressed in the idea to wish to die, in the
fixation of the attention in its own one and wished death. Then the
abnormal thing begins, the unnatural thing, the destructive thing,
because in fact we are programmed biologically, ancestrally, for all
the opposite, as it is to explore, to fight, to defend to us, to hunt
(in the literal sense and the symbolic sense), to attack, to ask to
us, to inquire to us, and our attention concentrated in each objective
part of a basic alert status that we never lose, except for when we
slept very well. We are not programmed to give to us tamely, as it is
not it in any animal.

How takes place then the cerebral damage that leads to the death?
To understand this we need to explain some very basic things, although
surprising little known. In the first place that we have nine senses:
vision, hearing, equilibrium, tact, space perception/orientation,
taste, sense of smell, sense of strange it (or familiarity sense) and
of the corporal perception. All these senses, and perhaps others more,
are active in the basic alert status and they have two components: an
automatic one of immediate reaction (one falls in love a light and
blinking, it smells sulphydric vapors, the substance that is put to
the gas tubes to detect a loss immediately, and I separate, etc.), and
another component of recognition, in which the stimuli are sent to the
brain and there it is collated if that information has been loaded.
They are the sensorial recognition systems we have.
Then, EVERYTHING WHAT WE DO, EVERYTHING WHAT WE THOUGHT, BY MORE BANAL
OR INSIGNIFICANT THAN IS, IS RECORDED IN THE BRAIN IN FORM OF NEURONAL
NETWORK IN WHICH  PARTICIPATE  NEURONS OF THIS SENSORIAL RECOGNITION
?S  SYSTEMS OF THE NINE CHANNELS, INEXORABLY.
And those networks that are armed in our brain also were reinforced
when we return to make the same act or the same thought.
But in addition BECAUSE IN FACT ALL IS CONCECTED WITH ALL, WHICH WE
ARE GOING TO DO WAS CONNECTED IN MORE OR LESS STRAIGHT FORWARD FORM
WITH WHICH ALREADY WE HAVE DONE AND LOADED LIKE NEURONAL NETWORKS IN
OUR BRAIN.
Some of those connections have a great importance in the every day
actions and others very remotely: although the door seems to be very
heavy, already we know that the force that we must make to open it
isn't so high. Or for example the natural attraction by rhythm that
are multiple or sub multiple of the heart rate (that we listened for
the first time in our mother's uterus), seems like related with this
indeed. That is to say, to live means to be stimulating everything
somehow what we have done, lived and thought. It seems exhausting, but
it is a fascinating question.
However, when a person fix attention to death, that is something
abstract that does not required any motor or cognitive reply, AND
RESORTING TO THE NATURAL AND AVAILABLE MECHANISM DISPOSED IN ALL
PERSONS THEY TO BLOCK THE RECEPTION OF OTHER STIMULI WHEN WE
CONCENTRATED THE ATTENTION IN SOMETHING INTENSIVELY ATTRRACTED, THESE
PEOPLE HAPPEN TO BLOCK, at the outset in oscillating form, with
variations throughout a day or of days, THE SENSORIAL STIMULI OF THE
DIFFERENT CHANNELS. It is a biological basic mechanism since we must
be concentrated in the tiger that attacks to us and we cannot disperse
with the colored birds that are jumping back: it's a survival
principle. Who know more the utility of this principle are the
pickpockets of the human agglomerates: one of them produces a smaller
but clear aggression on the victim. In reaction the victim is put in
guard and concentrates its attention on the aggressor, while his
companion removes the wallet or cuts the portfolio's strap, because we
have blocked the tact and the corporal perception when putting to us
in guard in front of the aggressor and concentrating the attention in
him.
The displacement of the attention towards different objectives is a
normal and a routinely task, but in the people who enter CPD process
they are persistently blocking the reception of stimuli by the
different sensorial channels and the consequent arrived to the brain,
so that the neurons of the sensorial recognition systems that comprise
of the sensorial networks doesn't receive stimuli, with which in the
long run lose the synaptic connections and the networks are disarmed.
Something equivalent to the atrophy of a muscle we never use. This
avoid progressively all the recognition tasks. No longer they
recognize, no longer have capacity of recovery of recent events (weak
neuronal networks, with low sensorial stimulation), and however still
can recover events of the past. But not anyone, but THOSE IN WHICH THE
LIVED EVENTS (SENSORIAL NETWORKS ARMED IN THE PAST) WERE POSSIBLE WITH
A GREAT STIMULATION (EMOTIONAL), PROLONGED REINFORCED AND CONNECTED
WITH MULTIPLE OTHER SENSORIAL NETWORKS, LIKE THE DOOR OF OUR HOME AT
OUR CHILDHOOD, by where we did not shelter, by where we shook to
arrive all smeared, by where we arrived to eat, etc.
Thus, those faults of the sensorial recognition systems  were the more
consistent biological indicators to detect that a person is in a
dementia of this type.Chemicals or physical parameters aren?t the
unique biological indicators
THE PROGRESSIVE DISINTEGRATION OF THE NEURONAL NETWORKS IN OUR BRAIN
BY STIMULATION DEFICIT OF THE RECOGNITION SENSORIAL SYSTEMS IS THE
ESSENCE OF THE DEMENTIZATION PROCESS, AND LEADS TO THE DEATH BECAUSE
AN AUTOMATIC ESSENTIAL SYSTEM HAS CONNECTIONS WITH SENSORIAL NETWORKS,
THAT WHEN ALSO THEY GET TO BE AFFECTED, CAUSES THE DEATH.
Then isn't properly a disease ("signs and symptoms that responds to a
well-known cause"), isn't genetic, it doesn't have relation with aging
(frequent confusion comes from that to greater age is the probability
of suffering painful losses, that are a very frequent trigger one,
since we have already said), does not begin with any damage in the
brain but that concludes in the long run in this, isn't a problem of
the memory but of the attention, and before this one of the desire,
and before this one of the satisfaction search, and before this one of
the biological and psychological impulsions arranged by the will, and
even before the basal state of alert that characterizes to us. One of
the last forms of the expression of the process is the problem with
the memory, but in fact the difficulty to recover events is the last
link of a very long chain, and to have concentrated in it and not in
the attention's deficit of can be the reason of the delayed to
understand the process, and the habitual confusion with several
behaviors proper of aging.
And finally, isn't irreversible, since it is possible and it gives
clear and forceful result, to elevate to those people the self-esteem
and the attention to him, and to permute the abstract idea of wished
death by the one of a real life that surrounds it, the shade by the
light that surrounds us to all to little that we lend a little
attention, taken care of and love, and inserting it in a new extolling
routine for the dairy life. It is not easy, is an abyss of difference
with giving a tablet, but it is tremendously positive as much for the
affected ones as for which we worked with the protocols derived from
the psycho-social neuro sensorial disintegrative theory of the chronic
progressive dementization.

Prof.Lic.Luis Mar?a S?nchez de Machado,
Neurobiologist, Director,
Alzheimer?s  Project Argentina
TE 0054 3442 431442   stopalz@gmail.com    www.stopalz.org

Few references:

Sanchez de Machado LM et al., Rev Neurol 2007; 44(4): 198-202.
Sanchez de Machado LM, I J World Health and  Societal Politics 2005,
Vol. 2 (1)
Sanchez de Machado LM, Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol 2004; 39(6):371-80.
Sanchez de Machado LM, Geriatrianet 2004, Vol. 6(1)
Evelyn Ruut - 05 Aug 2007 18:13 GMT
>I took a day off from going to see mom, I went to the show and saw
> hairspray but my mind was still on mom. I wish I could shake this guilty
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> them more.
> JJ

JJ, stop torturing yourself.   She is probably doing fine.   The most
important thing you can do for both of you is to leave her completely for a
few days without visiting, preferably at least a week.   That way she HAS to
adjust, and will settle in better.     I never thought my mother in law
would ever settle in, but she did, and we were worried for nothing.

They keep them active and they keep them busy in the day, because it most
resembles normal patterns.  Keeping their brain active preserves their
abilities longer.   Also they are more tired at night and will sleep better,
more like a normal person.

Signature

Best Regards,

Evelyn

Dennis P. Harris - 06 Aug 2007 22:41 GMT
> JJ, stop torturing yourself.   She is probably doing fine.   The most
> important thing you can do for both of you is to leave her completely for a
> few days without visiting, preferably at least a week.   That way she HAS to
> adjust, and will settle in better.

what she said.  seriously.  go away, i mean take a real vacation
SOMEWHERE ELSE for a whole week.  go to a spa or resort and just
soak or sunbathe.
Mary_Gordon@tvo.org - 05 Aug 2007 21:00 GMT
JJ, its early days yet. You are so totally enmeshed with your mother -
in an unhealthy way - that it will take some time to disengage. Limit
your visits to a couple of short ones per week. The rest of your life
has withered away while you were caregiving, and it will take time for
it to start to flourish again. Take a trip, visit some friends, go
away for a weekend, sign up for something.

You are not responsible for how your mother feels. She has a damaged
brain and life is a complete jumble to her. They could be treating her
like she's a queen at a spa, and she still wouldn't be happy. I know
with my mother in law, the short term memory issues meant she would
complain she wasn't fed, even if you'd eaten lunch with her half an
hour earlier. She'd say she'd done nothing all day when you knew she'd
been at interesting activities. She'd kvetch that no one came to see
her when friends had been there earlier that same day. She wouldn't
remember the trip to the hairdressers, the treats from the tuck shop,
the snacks in the kitchenette. And worse, she invented miseries to
torture herself with - she thought the short haired ladies who helped
her dress (and she needed help, or she'd go out in various layers
including a bra on top of her blouse) were men trying to assault her.
When she wouldn't wear her teeth, she explained her lack of teeth by
saying she'd been attacked by bad boys. She claimed the ladies who ate
lunch with her said mean things to her, but she was very deaf and the
things she claimed they said included complex details of family events
from 60 years previous that no one else could know about. It was
delusions, confusion, and confabulation. m

It would not have mattered where she was, she wouldn't have been happy
because nothing in her life made sense anymore, and it was stressful
to get through a day when everything was a confusing awful swirl. We
moved her from one facility to another across town when she needed
more help than the first place could supply and she didn't even
realize she was in a new place, although it was very radically
different in layout etc. The point is - it wasn't the place, it wasn't
the people around her. She wanted to go home - but if you asked her,
she wanted to go to her parents house, gone for 60 years. She'd
forgotten she was ever married.

You are not responsible for how your mother feels. It is not your
fault in any way, and you cannot fix it. It is her disease. She may
nor may not ever get used to where she is because her brain cannot
learn new things, and is losing its ability to recognize places.The
key point for you now is that there is not a viable alternative. You
cannot, cannot, cannot look after her yourself. It is killing you, and
your mother needs you healthy and well.

"Dementia" is a garbage pail diagnosis. It is a term like "fever" that
describes a set of symptoms. In other words, they are saying she has
cognitive impairments, which you already know, but they are not saying
what it is FROM. Its always caused by something, whether that
something is Alzheimer's, strokes, tumours, or any of the dozens of
other diseases that cause brain damage resulting in mental
impairments.

They are keeping her up all day because people with dementia of
various types routinely have sleep disturbances - as you yourself have
observed. They get their days and nights mixed up, and if they sleep
during the day, they will not be tired at bedtime, or worse, they will
wake up in the middle of the night and be ready to rock and roll. Or
get up 17 times, disturbing everyone else in the place. They keep her
moving around, and stop her from napping during the day, so she stays
on regular hours and is more in sync with the routines of the day.

One reason not to give them too many sweets is that many of the
dementias cause problems with appetite and if a person will only eat
so much, you want to make every bite count in terms of nutrition - you
don't want their health to deteriorate due to not eating a balanced
diet if they have a marked preference for sweets.  With Alzheimer's,
the appetite problem may be caused by the loss of sense of smell early
in the illness, which in turn impacts how things taste and causes a
reduction in appetite. Other causes of dementia can cause
uncontrollable eating, and a terrible sweet tooth. Not good if they
snack on sugary stuff and then won't eat their dinner. If she is
losing weight, they will want to try her on some supplements like
Ensure, Boost or Gain, that have a lot of nutrition as well as extra
calories.

Hang in JJ. Stop looking to her for approval and acceptance. The days
for that are over. You are in effect the parent now, and have to do
what is best for both of you, and believe me, I know this is tough.
I'd strongly recommend you reconsider the plan to volunteer at the
place, as for the time being, you need to focus on getting your own
life back, rather than continue to let it be consumed by your mother's
illness.

Mary G.
Tumbleweed - 05 Aug 2007 21:25 GMT
> JJ, its early days yet. You are so totally enmeshed with your mother -
> in an unhealthy way - that it will take some time to disengage. Limit
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> brain and life is a complete jumble to her. They could be treating her
> like she's a queen at a spa, and she still wouldn't be happy.

<snip>

Well said Mary.......JJ,  Mary is absolutely right, and especially
understand her words "You are not responsible for how your mother feels. She
has a damaged brain and life is a complete jumble to her."

You CANNOT make things better for your mother in the way she wants, you cant
answer her questions in such a way she will be happy, all you can do is make
sure she is cared for as well as possible, which iswhat you have done.

Let go, go back to your life, and visit her when you want to BUT NOT EVERY
DAY...its not doing you any good and it certainly isnt doing her any good
either.

Signature

Tumbleweed

email replies not necessary but to contact use;
tumbleweednews at hotmail dot com

Evelyn Ruut - 05 Aug 2007 22:21 GMT
> JJ, its early days yet. You are so totally enmeshed with your mother -
> in an unhealthy way - that it will take some time to disengage. Limit
[quoted text clipped - 82 lines]
>
> Mary G.

Mary said it best.....

JJ, I just wanted you to know that I agreed with Mary 100%
Signature

Best Regards,

Evelyn

June - 05 Aug 2007 22:49 GMT
>> Hang in JJ. Stop looking to her for approval and acceptance. The days
> for that are over. You are in effect the parent now, and have to do
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Mary G.

JJ, Mary has said it very well.   Perhaps there's a bit of denial still left
over and time will help.  Hope you can find some peace.  You deserve
it......June
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.