Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Alzheimer's / May 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Parkinson's and Alzheimer's / oxidative stress

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
ironjustice@aol.com - 28 Apr 2006 10:58 GMT
Public release date: 27-Apr-2006

Contact: Holly Korschun
hkorsch@emory.edu
404-727-3990
Emory University Health Sciences Center

Scientists discover possible link between oxidative stress and
non-hereditary degenerative disease
ATLANTA--The irreversible neurological degeneration associated with
Parkinson's and Alzheimer's diseases may be the consequence of
oxidative stress--the imbalance of antioxidants and pro-oxidants in
cells. This imbalance results in an excess of reactive oxygen
species--harmful oxygen-containing molecules that can cause damage to
proteins. In the April 21 issue of the Journal of Biological Chemistry,
scientists from the Emory University School of Medicine report that the
protein DJ-1 is oxidatively damaged in non-hereditary (sporadic)
Parkinson's disease.
While scientists do not know the function of DJ-1, they have previously
identified abnormalities in DJ-1 that directly cause hereditary
(familial) Parkinson's disease. About 10 percent of Parkinson's disease
cases are hereditary forms caused by either a genetic deletion or
mutations that result in amino acid substitutions, which can
dramatically affect protein structure or function.

The cause of the 90 percent of Parkinson's Disease cases not influenced
by genetics has remained more of a mystery. Lian Li, PhD, is associate
professor of pharmacology at Emory University School of Medicine and
lead author of this study, which was funded by a grant from the
National Institutes of Health. "One popular theory has suggested that
these sporadic cases result from exposure to environmental toxins, such
as herbicides or pesticides," she says. "Previous research has
indicated that these toxins lead to oxidative stress. While oxidative
stress does occur naturally as humans age, further oxidation caused by
toxins may overwhelm the bodyÕs antioxidants."

Until now, attempts to link environmental toxins to oxidation and
neurological disorders have been only somewhat successful, in part
because scientists have been unable to identify the molecular target of
oxidation. "This theory [that toxins cause oxidative stress] has been
around for a long time," says Dr. Li. "But whatÕs been damaged by this
oxidative stress?"

Aware of the connection between DJ-1 mutations and familial Parkinson's
disease, Dr. Li and her collaborators examined the oxidation levels of
the protein in sporadic cases. Their hypothesis that DJ-1 was the
missing link proved to be correct: DJ-1 in patients who had Parkinson's
disease showed signs of oxidative damage, including structural changes
as the protein accumulated additional oxygen molecules (carbonylation
and methonine oxidation).

These modifications to DJ-1 caused by the oxidative stress are
irreversible and irreparable. Like familial Parkinson's disease, the
structural changes to the DJ-1 protein in sporadic Parkinson's disease
signal an abnormality, leading to the eventual degradation and loss of
the protein. "The protein unfolds and cannot function normally," Dr. Li
explains. "Not recognizing the unfamiliar shape, the protein is broken
down by the cell. The end result is the same: you lose your protein.
Any mutation or modification causing this protein to lose its function
will then lead to neurodegeneration in Parkinson's disease."

Now that Dr. Li and her team are clear that a relationship between DJ-1
and neurodegeneration exists, they are preparing to extend their
examination into the protein's role. Based on biochemical analysis, Dr.
Li believes DJ-1 may serve as a protease, activating and deactivating a
protein by cleaving the bonds that connect its amino acids. Dr. Li is
also currently exploring the possibility that DJ-1 may serve as an
antioxidant, and that when mutated or damaged, the protein cannot
defend the cell.

Future information about the role of DJ-1 may enable the development of
drugs to specifically target the protein, perhaps stopping or reversing
Parkinson's disease or Alzheimer's disease, which also may be impacted
by the oxidation of DJ-1. In the meantime, says Dr. Li, people looking
to prevent neurological degeneration might do well by looking to the
kitchen cabinet, not the pharmacy: green tea and vitamin C supplements
are two bountiful sources of antioxidants.

###

Who loves ya.
Tom

Jesus Was A Vegetarian!
http://jesuswasavegetarian.7h.com

Man Is A Herbivore!
http://pages.ivillage.com/ironjustice/manisaherbivore

DEAD PEOPLE WALKING
http://pages.ivillage.com/ironjustice/deadpeoplewalking
heerabiji@gmail.com - 28 Apr 2006 13:43 GMT
studies had proved that use of turmeric in dishes will reduce the
Alzheimer's disease to a good extend

http://arremedies.blogspot.com/
Tumbleweed - 28 Apr 2006 17:04 GMT
> studies had proved that use of turmeric in dishes will reduce the
> Alzheimer's disease to a good extend
>
> http://arremedies.blogspot.com/

tosh and piffle, studies have 'proved' no such thing.

Signature

Tumbleweed

email replies not necessary but to contact use;
tumbleweednews at hotmail dot com

f.ck Google - 02 May 2006 15:09 GMT
From Stuart Hyderman who also claims to be a chiropractor wrote in message:
Stuart hydernan hyderman stuart

> > studies had proved that use of turmeric in dishes will reduce the
> > Alzheimer's disease to a good extend
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> email replies not necessary but to contact use;
> tumbleweednews at hotmail dot com
Alan Meyer - 03 May 2006 03:55 GMT
> > studies had proved that use of turmeric in dishes will reduce the
> > Alzheimer's disease to a good extend
> >
> > http://arremedies.blogspot.com/
> >
> tosh and piffle, studies have 'proved' no such thing.

I don't think there's any proof yet that turmeric will combat
Alzheimer's Disease, but there is some evidence for it.  I
searched Pubmed for "turmeric Alzheimer's" (without quotes).
There were fifteen studies published from 2001-2005 that show
some evidence, including a lot of good effects in mice with the
mouse Alzheimer's that's used for testing these things.

There are no human studies that are yet complete, but not one of
the 15 test tube and mouse studies said it was useless.

There's also evidence that it's pretty safe.  People in south
Asia have been eating lots of it for centuries and studies
haven't shown any problems.

I can say for a fact that turmeric isn't sufficient to stop
Alzheimer's.  My father-in-law bought pounds of the stuff and fed
it to his wife in home made capsules in the hope of arresting her
AD.  Who knows if it helped.  But we do know it didn't stop her
degeneration.

My view of these kinds of things - turmeric, omega 3 fatty acids,
ibuprofen, green tea, red wine - is that, if they're cheap and
safe, why not take them?  If they make only a 10% difference in
the time it takes for AD to develop, I still want that 10%.  And
besides, I like curry, tea, fish, and red wine, and the ibuprofen
makes my knees feel better.  [However I wouldn't buy any of these
things from a guy I never heard of who's selling stuff on the
web.  I'd get it from someone I trust.]

There's another reason too that I take these things.
Psychologically, it makes me feel like I'm doing something about
it.  It's little enough to do, but it keeps me from feeling
totally helpless.

Still, the main things I'm relying on aren't the dietary
supplements but physical and mental exercise.  Those are things
that absolutely make me feel better - whether or not they provide
any protection against AD, so again, why not do them?

   Alan
Tumbleweed - 03 May 2006 07:56 GMT
>> > studies had proved that use of turmeric in dishes will reduce the
>> > Alzheimer's disease to a good extend
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
>
>    Alan

no disagreement there. just didnt want to let a statement that said that
studies have *proved* something, go by unchallenged, when at best they have
shown an association, not ' a 10% difference'. A recent massive
re-evaluation of all the omega 3 studies, by the way, showed that they in
fact make no discernible difference to heart attacks, and red wine isnt
looking too clever either :-)

Signature

Tumbleweed

email replies not necessary but to contact use;
tumbleweednews at hotmail dot com

Alan Meyer - 03 May 2006 22:06 GMT
> .... A recent massive re-evaluation of all the omega 3 studies, by the way, showed that
> they in fact make no discernible difference to heart attacks, and red wine isnt looking
> too clever either :-)

It's incredible how many fads there are in health information.
Somebody does a study that appears to show that eating X is
associated with reduced (heart disease, cancer, AD, pick one)
and another dozen studies support it.  Everybody goes out and
buys the stuff.   Then somebody checks it again and casts doubt
on the whole thing.

Part of the problem is that there's some irresponsible research
being done that isn't careful enough.  I think that part however is
just that the biology is so complicated that science doesn't yet
have the understanding we need to accurately analyze the issues.

   Alan
Tumbleweed - 04 May 2006 12:20 GMT
>> .... A recent massive re-evaluation of all the omega 3 studies, by the
>> way, showed that they in fact make no discernible difference to heart
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
>    Alan

I think also its incredibly difficult to unpick all the various different
factors however hard they try (and often they dont try very well).

For example, they might find two sets of people that appear, overall, to be
the same except one takes, for example, a certain supplement or diet factor
and the other doesnt, and then conclude that differences in, say alzheimers
or heart attacks, are therefore due to that factor. However, what they might
miss is, that say the group taking the supplement against heart attacks,
might also walk up stairs instead of taking the elevator, or resist the
temptation to have that 'one chocolate bar', or have other subtle
differences in behaviour that simply arent picked up by surveys (that are
usually the main way these studies are done.)

As I recall, the Omega 3 review went back and looked at the many previous
studies out there (hundreds), and to summarise, found that the more careful
each study was with regard to examining the lifestyle of the people in it,
the smaller the "effect", down to no statistical effect at all in the most
exacting studies (previously ignored as statistical flukes*). My mother
takes a garlic pill each day and tells me she hasnt had a cold since 19xx.
Hmm, she is forgetting quite a few I think :-: Some of these studies dont
get much above that anecdotal level.

This is where the tumeric results are coming from, there isnt much Az in
India and they eat lots of curries there. Ok, the conclusion is obvious,
isnt it :-)

*there is also a worrying self-censorship effect in science. Person sets out
to prove that X causes Y, does a study, it doesnt prove that,so first the
study is marked as a failure (and maybe repeated until it does!), and
secondly its much less likely to be published than a study that shows an
effect, since its very dull to have an in depth study that shows that
nothing happened :-)

Signature

Tumbleweed

email replies not necessary but to contact use;
tumbleweednews at hotmail dot com

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.