Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Alzheimer's / January 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

3rd annual: Are shoes the cause of Alzheimer's disease?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
James Semmel - 05 Jan 2006 18:52 GMT
TO: All Alzheimer's disease researchers, doctors, and patients.

I am a 35-year-old electrical engineer investigating the biomechanical
effects of shoes on degenerative diseases.  Each year I post about this
admittedly unusual connection, but thus far nobody has taken it
seriously.

Alzheimer's disease is just one example of diseases that are related to
the use of footwear, especially since it affects women
disproportionately more than men.  Women's footwear is more physically
deforming to the feet because of higher heels, pointier toes, and
smaller sizes, but any shoe might have a more deforming effect on the
lighter build of a woman's body.  Even the first clinical case,
presenting to Dr. Alois Alzheimer in 1901, was a woman called "Auguste
D." who was born on May 16, 1850, during the last year that shoes were
made completely by hand.  Isaac Singer's sewing machine of 1851 made
modern shoes widely available for the first time in the history of
mankind.  The second clinical case of what became known as Alzheimer's
disease was a man, "Johann F." born about a year later on March 8,
1853.  Both "Auguste D." and "Johann F." were among the first children
growing up in the modern manufactured shoe era.

Chiropodist Dr. Simon J. Wikler pioneered efforts to understand the
influences of shoes in the 1950's, but his work was neglected during
the subsequent drug- and diet-based approaches to medicine.  However,
the prolific footwear historian and podiatrist Dr. William A. Rossi
clearly demonstrated throughout his publications that shoes influence
the posture of the human body.  Therefore, using the posture-based
approaches to medicine of the distinguished orthopedist Dr. Joel E.
Goldthwait, I have expanded Dr. Wikler's insightful work to include a
variety of illnesses and conditions whose causes remain unknown.  You
may find my thesis regarding shoes and disease on the Internet at:

http://www.shoebusters.com

My outlined treatment involves removing the cause, but resorting to
wide-toed, soft-soled moccasins; regularly applying a contrast bath, or
more descriptively, an alternate cold-hot footbath, to maintain
flexibility in the feet; rehabilitation of the abdominal muscles, via
forced exhalation, to balance the feet; and getting plenty of rest.

Thank you very much for considering my novel approach.

James Semmel
Albuquerque, NM
Tumbleweed - 05 Jan 2006 19:18 GMT
> TO: All Alzheimer's disease researchers, doctors, and patients.
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Alzheimer's disease is just one example of diseases that are related to
> the use of footwear <snip>

I think you'll find that shoes with a high proportion of iron are even
worse,and should they have aluminum buckles, you'll be lucky to get home
from the store whilst wearing them.

Signature

Tumbleweed

email replies not necessary but to contact use;
tumbleweednews at hotmail dot com

June - 05 Jan 2006 20:18 GMT
> TO: All Alzheimer's disease researchers, doctors, and patients.
>
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
> James Semmel
> Albuquerque, NM

Hmmmmm ...... This may us new insight about the "Old woman who lived in a
shoe"

June
Dennis P. Harris - 06 Jan 2006 03:51 GMT
> I am a 35-year-old electrical engineer investigating the biomechanical
> effects of shoes on degenerative diseases.  Each year I post about this
> admittedly unusual connection, but thus far nobody has taken it
> seriously.

for a very good reason!  because, of course, there is NO
connection, and you are just a crank!

> Alzheimer's disease is just one example of diseases that are related to
> the use of footwear, especially since it affects women
> disproportionately more than men.  

yes, going barefoot is the answer, the only answer.  yeah, sure,
right.  you loonies always have ONE cause for all diseases.

PLONK.
Tumbleweed - 06 Jan 2006 09:05 GMT
Sense of humour / irony failure detected.

Signature

Tumbleweed

email replies not necessary but to contact use;
tumbleweednews at hotmail dot com

>
>> I am a 35-year-old electrical engineer investigating the biomechanical
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> PLONK.
James Semmel - 06 Jan 2006 21:19 GMT
Don't be too quick to dismiss the shoe theory.  I know it seems
unusual, but it's not that far-fetched.

The feet play a vital role in balancing the body, but shoes make that
task much harder.  Every organ in the body must likewise work harder.

In fact, of all the connections between shoes and human illness, I
think that Alzheimer's disease is the most intriguing.  It demonstrates
the importance of the feet in determining our personality and behavior.

james
Evelyn Ruut - 06 Jan 2006 21:41 GMT
When the only tool you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.

Signature

Best Regards,

Evelyn
(to reply to me personally, remove 'sox')

> Don't be too quick to dismiss the shoe theory.  I know it seems
> unusual, but it's not that far-fetched.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> james
June - 06 Jan 2006 21:49 GMT
> Don't be too quick to dismiss the shoe theory.  I know it seems
> unusual, but it's not that far-fetched.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> james

Especially foot in mouth.........June
Anthony Shipley - 07 Jan 2006 01:30 GMT
>> Don't be too quick to dismiss the shoe theory.  I know it seems
>> unusual, but it's not that far-fetched.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>Especially foot in mouth.........June

Quite! (But some, other, posters should be 'quiet'!

anthony shipley

Run away with me; I can make you unhappy.
Anthony Shipley - 07 Jan 2006 01:26 GMT
>In fact, of all the connections between shoes and human illness, I
>think that Alzheimer's disease is the most intriguing.  It demonstrates
>the importance of the feet in determining our personality and behavior.

And, of course, we shouldn't omit the the important statistical connection
between the vast majority of people who have worn shoes all their lives but have
never contracted A.D.

A more important connection is that between those with a brain and those
without...

anthony shipley

Run away with me; I can make you unhappy.
Gwen Love - 07 Jan 2006 02:34 GMT
Anthony, glad to see you still have your sense of humor!
Gwen

>>In fact, of all the connections between shoes and human illness, I
>>think that Alzheimer's disease is the most intriguing.  It demonstrates
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Run away with me; I can make you unhappy.
Anthony Shipley - 07 Jan 2006 04:01 GMT
>Anthony, glad to see you still have your sense of humor!
>Gwen

Thanks, Gwen. All I've got left is my cat and my naughty..

>>>In fact, of all the connections between shoes and human illness, I
>>>think that Alzheimer's disease is the most intriguing.  It demonstrates
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>>
>> Run away with me; I can make you unhappy.

anthony shipley

Run away with me; I can make you unhappy.
Evelyn Ruut - 07 Jan 2006 04:14 GMT
>>Anthony, glad to see you still have your sense of humor!
>>Gwen
>
> Thanks, Gwen. All I've got left is my cat and my naughty..

A cat can be the best companion sometimes......:-)
We have two of them around here...

Signature

Best Regards,

Evelyn
(to reply to me personally, remove 'sox')

Gwen Love - 07 Jan 2006 04:59 GMT
Catrs are much easier to care for than a dog, but I wouldn't trade my dog
for anything.  My son and daughter-in-law have 4 cats and 3 dogs.  Too many
animals for me!
Gwen

>>>Anthony, glad to see you still have your sense of humor!
>>>Gwen
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> A cat can be the best companion sometimes......:-)
> We have two of them around here...
Anthony Shipley - 07 Jan 2006 05:02 GMT
>We have two of them around here...

Ditto. One very aged Ginger cat that weighs only about a ginger bisciut and a 4
y.o. tortoise shell who likes scratching me (and making me bleed -:)

anthony shipley

Run away with me; I can make you unhappy.
Evelyn Ruut - 07 Jan 2006 14:05 GMT
>>We have two of them around here...
>
> Ditto. One very aged Ginger cat that weighs only about a ginger bisciut
> and a 4
> y.o. tortoise shell who likes scratching me (and making me bleed -:)

I have a Ginger colored male that my mother in law rescued as a half
starved, filthy, tiny, skinny kitten.   We took it from her and brought it
here, because at that time the poor woman couldn't even take care of
herself, much less a very sick kitten.   Anyway he did survive and became a
very nice cat.   He loves me the best and is so affectionate he is almost a
pest.

Then we have a black female cat too.   My son rescued the mother who
immediately had a bunch of kittens.   He called me up and told me I was
taking one :-)   That one is my husband's favorite and she sleeps with him
and follows him everywhere.  When he takes the dog out for a walk and she
misses getting out in time, she cries by the door, angry that she didn't get
to go out too.

The pair of them hunt together and have managed to clear the entire
neighborhood of mice and other small furry things...... chipmunks, baby
squirrels, moles...   Fortunately they don't often kill any birds, but they
do like to kill frogs down by the pond.

Signature

Best Regards,

Evelyn
(to reply to me personally, remove 'sox')

James Semmel - 10 Jan 2006 19:20 GMT
Anthony,

Just about everyone experiences some lapse in memory as their posture
clearly deteriorates into old age.  By maintaining good posture, one
can preserve the function of many organs, including the brain.

james
pellmellwillynilly@hotmail.com - 20 Jan 2006 05:29 GMT
I'm not well enough educated in biomechanics to evaluate your webpages,
but nothing looks amiss to me. I'd be curious, though, to know what
today's doctors and chiropractors think of the chiropodist you've used
so heavily as a resource. I'd also be curious to know what you think of
Nia.

> Don't be too quick to dismiss the shoe theory.  I know it seems
> unusual, but it's not that far-fetched.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> james
James Semmel - 20 Jan 2006 18:13 GMT
Nia,

I think the shoe-Alzheimer's connection is very accessible.  It just
requires an open mind, but certainly not an advanced degree.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

james
pellmellwillynilly@hotmail.com - 22 Jan 2006 01:44 GMT
> Nia,
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> james

What I wrote was this:

"I'd be curious, though, to know what today's doctors and chiropractors
think of the chiropodist you've used so heavily as a resource. I'd also
be curious to know what you think of Nia."

My name is not Nia. I want to know what you think of Nia. Try this:

www.nia-nia.com

I also want to know what today's doctors and chiropractors think of the
chiropodist you've used so heavily as a resource.

Those are my questions.

Pell
James Semmel - 22 Jan 2006 19:18 GMT
Pell,

I looked at the website you provided, and it seems to me that standing
posture and gait are more fundamental considerations.  After optimizing
the posture, specialized exercises and movements, such as the type you
inquired about, can be attempted, but in the beginning the basic
activities of daily life are sufficient.  Indeed, daily life may be
more than some can handle.

Chiropodist Dr. Simon Wikler corresponded with a number of doctors and
researchers on the subject of shoes and degenerative disease, but he
passed away around 1990.  There may be a few practicing doctors left
who know of him.

The distinguished orthopedist Dr. Joel Goldthwait was another
outstanding pioneer in the field of posture and degenerative disease.
I can assure you that none of today's researchers or doctors has seen
his work, which occurred during the first half of the 20th century.

I also utilized the contributions of podiatrist Dr. William Rossi, who
clearly demonstrated in his work that shoes fundamentally influence the
posture and gait of any wearer.  Dr. Rossi passed away just a few years
ago, and he's well known to many podiatrists, despite his viewpoints
that go against the grain of the profession. (Shoes obviously cause a
number of foot ills, but it seems like today's podiatrists are slow to
recognize that.)

Basically, I just put the three together to make what I feel are
obvious extensions.  Dr. Rossi found that shoes cause poor posture, and
Dr. Goldthwait found that poor posture causes degenerative diseases;
Dr. Wikler was the first to discover that shoes are a cause of illness
in humans.  Alzheimer's disease is one of those that I now consider to
be obviously caused by footwear.

james
pellmellwillynilly@hotmail.com - 22 Jan 2006 22:40 GMT
> Pell,
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> activities of daily life are sufficient.  Indeed, daily life may be
> more than some can handle.

Interesting. My impression of Nia -- via the website and my personal
experience with it -- is that it's based on the premise that barefoot
is best for many things, among them developing posture and gait. I had
been thinking that the Nia and yoga people might be good avenues for
your ideas. Likewise biomedical engineers or others educated in the
body as well as engineering.

> Chiropodist Dr. Simon Wikler corresponded with a number of doctors and
> researchers on the subject of shoes and degenerative disease, but he
> passed away around 1990.  There may be a few practicing doctors left
> who know of him.

<snip>

> The distinguished orthopedist Dr. Joel Goldthwait was another
> outstanding pioneer in the field of posture and degenerative disease.

<snip>

> I also utilized the contributions of podiatrist Dr. William Rossi, who

<snip>

> Basically, I just put the three together to make what I feel are
> obvious extensions.  Dr. Rossi found that shoes cause poor posture, and
> Dr. Goldthwait found that poor posture causes degenerative diseases;
> Dr. Wikler was the first to discover that shoes are a cause of illness
> in humans.  Alzheimer's disease is one of those that I now consider to
> be obviously caused by footwear.

It makes a lot of sense to tie together the views of these people. What
doesn't make as much sense is that they seem so unknown when they made
presumably fundamental discoveries -- and if their research was sound,
which much research is not. Were their findings not published in
peer-reviewed journals? Were the findings somehow discredited?

It's not as though science throws away ideas just because they're 50
years old. After all, we are all familiar with the findings of Galileo
Galilei, Isaac Newton, Edward Jennings, Marie Curie, and Jonas Salk.

I don't know where else you've tried to present your ideas, but you're
not finding the right audience, or if you have found it, they've seen
holes in your theory. You need to find people sufficiently educated to
evaluate your ideas and sufficiently connected to help you get your
ideas to the people who can test them (as in peer-reviewed journals).
Those people aren't on this newsgroup!
James Semmel - 23 Jan 2006 18:48 GMT
Pell,

Dr. Wikler published his seminal paper on the subject of shoes and
disease in the Journal of the National Association of Chiropodists,
volume 40, number 8, August 1950 in a paper titled "Foot Defects as
Possible Etiological Factors in Cancer." (Note that the JNAC became the
Journal of the American Podiatry Association later in that decade, and
the JAPA became today's Journal of the American Podiatric Medical
Association.)  It's rather humbling to realize that the medical
literature already contained the answer.

Yoga people have been extremely resistant to the idea that shoes cause
heart disease, cancers, and Alzheimer's disease.  Actually, the Society
for Barefoot Living (an internet group of people who like bare feet) is
the most skeptical--go figure!

I wholeheartedly disagree that my footbath/breathing therapy is only
for the "educated."  Indeed, the commoner of today knows much more
about the prevention of infectious disease using soap, than did the top
scientists and doctors of 150 years ago; the same will hold true for
future, unshod generations naturally preventing Alzheimer's disease,
which today's most eminent researchers and specialists have completely
failed to cure.

james
pellmellwillynilly@hotmail.com - 23 Jan 2006 23:44 GMT
> Pell,
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Association.)  It's rather humbling to realize that the medical
> literature already contained the answer.

Good info. Thanks.

> Yoga people have been extremely resistant to the idea that shoes cause
> heart disease, cancers, and Alzheimer's disease.  Actually, the Society
> for Barefoot Living (an internet group of people who like bare feet) is
> the most skeptical--go figure!

Barefoot Living people don't sound very scientific, but I'm surprised
that the yoga people don't know their own theories well enough to
embrace bare feet.

> I wholeheartedly disagree that my footbath/breathing therapy is only
> for the "educated."

I wasn't referring to understanding what to do but why to do it, and I
didn't mean about the footbath/breathing therapy, which I never saw on
your website. I was referring to all the theory about why and how
posture is affected by feet and disease effected by bad posture. BTW,
I'm no slouch intellectually. I hold two master's degrees (neither in a
science field) and an advanced certificate in publishing. If I got
bogged down in your writing because of my lack of background the
"commoner of today" is going to stop reading even sooner.

To evaluate the theories you've set forth takes a knowledge and
understanding of anatomy and physiology that neither the "commoner of
today" or I have. That's why people on this newsgroup -- "commoners of
today" and sometimes rather educated ones -- are accusing you of being
a troll or obsessed with feet. They don't have the education they need
to evaluate your proposals.

I do not have the time or energy to return to school for courses in
anatomy and physiology; I spend 12-16 hours a day teaching and writing.
I don't have time to slog through every word on your website. And,
given the fact that I have to take your theories on faith rather than
weighing them against knowledge I don't have, it makes no sense for me
to attempt to study your website any more than I have. Likely no one
else you've approached with your ideas has that time or energy.

I'm telling you as plainly as I can that you need properly educated
people to evaluate your theories. You need readers who do not have to
believe what you write but can consider it in the context of scientific
knowledge and understanding that they already possess. Only that kind
of person can intelligently agree or disagree with you, and if they
agree, help you get your ideas to the right forum.

That said, what you choose to believe is beyond my control.
James Semmel - 24 Jan 2006 19:19 GMT
Pell,

I couldn't disagree with you more on the need to be "educated."  My
shoe-Alzheimer's discovery was not preceded by a doctoral degree in
anatomy and physiology; it simply required an open mind.  The famous
endocrinologist, Dr. Hans Selye, who first applied the concept of
stress to medicine in pioneering the general adaptation syndrome, had a
word about discovery in his book about "The Stress of Life":

"There are two ways of detecting something that no one has yet seen:
one is to aim at the finest detail by getting as close as possible with
the best available analyzing instruments; the other is merely to look
at things from a new angle where they show hitherto unexposed facets.
The former requires money and experience; the latter presupposes
neither; indeed, it is actually aided by simplicity, the lack of
prejudice, and the absence of those established habits of thinking
which tend to come after long years of work. The general adaptation
syndrome could have been discovered during the Middle Ages, if not
earlier; its recognition did not depend upon the development of any
complicated pieces of apparatus, new techniques of observation, nor
even upon much training, ingenuity, or intelligence, as far as that
goes, but merely upon an unbiased state of mind, a fresh point of
view."

james
James Semmel - 11 Jan 2006 18:24 GMT
I'm really surprised that nobody is even willing to consider the
posture-Alzheimer's disease connection.  There is strong physical
evidence to support my idea, and I even outlined a treatment that can
be scientifically evaluated.  Is there any researcher or caregiver who
is interested?

james
James Semmel - 14 Jan 2006 21:36 GMT
My idea is not that far-fetched.  Isn't there anyone who is even
willing to consider it and try to understand it better?

james
Anthony Shipley - 14 Jan 2006 21:49 GMT
>My idea is not that far-fetched.  Isn't there anyone who is even
>willing to consider it and try to understand it better?

Without argument and factual support it's worth nothing.

anthony shipley

Run away with me; I can make you unhappy.
James Semmel - 16 Jan 2006 20:42 GMT
Indeed, I have even put forth a treatment based upon my anatomical and
physiological findings that footwear is the fundamental cause of
Alzheimer's disease.  The treatment can be scientifically or clinically
evaluated with minimal resources.  As we engineers like to say, "The
proof of the pudding is in the eating."

I realize that it's a crazy suggestion that such a mechanical object as
a shoe could result in a disease like Alzheimer's.  Yet researchers
have already searched, with the best technology available, and found no
definite external cause.  The cause must therefore be internal, i.e.,
muscle tension influenced by gravity.  I pick on shoes because they are
the most important factor influencing that muscle tension, and if we
raised children to be barefoot, as was done prior to Auguste D. (Dr.
Alzheimer's first clinical case of the disease), then Alzheimer's
disease would become rare in society as it once was.

I think the facts are there for anyone to see, but nobody is willing to
look and carefully examine.

james
Evelyn Ruut - 16 Jan 2006 21:15 GMT
I am sure nobody is interested in looking further into your theories because
it doesn't make a lick of sense to me.

Alzheimers is a brain disease, not a foot disease.

Signature

Best Regards,

Evelyn
(to reply to me personally, remove 'sox')

> Indeed, I have even put forth a treatment based upon my anatomical and
> physiological findings that footwear is the fundamental cause of
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> james
James Semmel - 17 Jan 2006 17:37 GMT
Evelyn,

The brain evolved in an upright posture that was inherently dependent
on the foot.  Thus, what happens at the feet fundamentally determines
what happens throughout the entire body, including the brain.

Unfortunately, researchers are zoomed way in to the brain, without
consideration of the larger environment that is actually what we call a
human being.

james
Anthony Shipley - 16 Jan 2006 23:03 GMT
>I think the facts are there for anyone to see, but nobody is willing to
>look and carefully examine.
If shoes cause AD, why are there so many people without AD?

anthony shipley

Run away with me; I can make you unhappy.
James Semmel - 17 Jan 2006 17:37 GMT
Anthony,

There are millions of people now with Alzheimer's disease.  In fact,
the plague of Alzheimer's disease spread during the 20th century, the
first one following the modern manufactured shoe.

Given the footwear changes of recent decades, the children of today
will be experiencing AD at younger ages, and so the 21st century will
see even more people with dementia.

james
Evelyn Ruut - 17 Jan 2006 18:53 GMT
> Anthony,
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> james

When the only tool you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.

Back before manufactured shoes people died much younger than they do today,
therefore they seldom lived long enough for alzheimers to kick in.

Nowadays there is greater longevity and that is why there are more cases on
record..... that and better diagnostics.

Figures can lie and liars can figure.

Signature

Best Regards,

Evelyn
(to reply to me personally, remove 'sox')

James Semmel - 18 Jan 2006 18:23 GMT
Evelyn,

Alzheimer's disease is considered an age-related condition, meaning
that it is not a natural consequence of aging cells.

You might also consider the health history of the presidents of the
United States, most of whom outlived the commoners of their time.
Several of the founding fathers lived past 80, but none developed
Alzheimer's disease as did a later president.

Even the first clinical case, presenting to Dr. Alzheimer about 100
years ago, wasn't that old for her time.  She was among the first
children growing up wearing a modern, manufactured shoe.

james
Evelyn Ruut - 18 Jan 2006 18:51 GMT
James, I am sorry to tell you that my father has worn shoes all his life,
usually ill fitting ones at that, he is 93 and as we speak he is doing his
very complicated taxes.   I really believe there is absolutely no merit to
your theory.
Signature


Best Regards,

Evelyn
(to reply to me personally, remove 'sox')

> Evelyn,
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> james
James Semmel - 18 Jan 2006 20:45 GMT
Evelyn,

You are not alone in your belief.  Since making my shoe discovery in
2003, I've corresponded with all of the major Alzheimer's disease
research organizations and patient outreach, and every single one has
turned down the subtle idea.  I've written to hundreds of researchers
and doctors, but not one is even willing to consider my treatment.

Nonetheless, if footwear does not cause Alzheimer's disease in humans,
then you ought to have a really easy time discrediting my hypothesis;
in other words, there must be something obviously wrong with it.

Can you please tell me what I am overlooking in my postural
(biomechanical) viewpoint of Alzheimer's disease?

james
Evelyn Ruut - 18 Jan 2006 21:25 GMT
> Evelyn,
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> james

Since so very many highly accredited individuals seem to discredit your
hypothesis, as well as the common person, maybe you ought to start searching
for a cause at the other end of the body.

Signature

Best Regards,

Evelyn
(to reply to me personally, remove 'sox')

Gwen Love - 18 Jan 2006 21:38 GMT
Evelyn, I think that would be a very good decision on his part.
Gwen

>> Evelyn,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> hypothesis, as well as the common person, maybe you ought to start
> searching for a cause at the other end of the body.
Evelyn Ruut - 18 Jan 2006 22:59 GMT
> Evelyn, I think that would be a very good decision on his part.
> Gwen

LOL!  Yep.

There are quite a few things that seem to increase the odds of getting it.
Head injuries, not using ones mind much in life, diabetes increases the
incidence as well.   None of these things takes place in the foot.

Signature

Best Regards,

Evelyn
(to reply to me personally, remove 'sox')

>>> Evelyn,
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>> hypothesis, as well as the common person, maybe you ought to start
>> searching for a cause at the other end of the body.
Anthony Shipley - 19 Jan 2006 00:51 GMT
>There are quite a few things that seem to increase the odds of getting it.
>Head injuries, not using ones mind much in life, diabetes increases the
>incidence as well.   None of these things takes place in the foot.

Evelyn, unrelated entirely to the foot fetishist, can you cite any papers
connecting head injuries to A.D (because I did have one).

As for A.D. and shoes, I think we'll find the connection halfway the head and
feet :-)

anthony shipley

Run away with me; I can make you unhappy.
Evelyn Ruut - 19 Jan 2006 03:18 GMT
>>There are quite a few things that seem to increase the odds of getting it.
>>Head injuries, not using ones mind much in life, diabetes increases the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> and
> feet :-)

Hi Anthony, I have had a couple of serious head injuries also.   I am not
good at doing that kind of research but I have read it in places that one
might be inclined to trust (at least trustworthy over dubious internet nut
cases like our footsie guy :-)

Below is a post from September 19th 2004 from our own Mary Gordon who posts
here often, (and who does this kind of research very thoroughly)  copied and
pasted here.

Head traumas are listed among the causes.

***********
(begin quoted material)

The usual drill is to start with a full physical including a review of
medical history AND all medications the person is on. What they are
looking for are any conditions that can cause confusion, memory loss,
fuzzy thinking etc. OTHER than Alzheimer's and other incurable
progressive dementias. After all, in an older person who may have a
constellation of medical issues, problems can brew and fly under the
detection radar due to the distraction of other medical concerns i.e.
the doctor is so focussed on the diabetes and the heart problem that
the brewing thyroid issue goes undetected. It can also happen that a
person is seeing a number of specialists and no one really knows ALL
the medications someone is taking - and interactions can be causing
problems. A good physical should also involve blood tests for thiubngs
like pernicious anemia and thyroid function.

Once the obvious non-AD things are ruled out, the next step is usually
a referral to a neurologist or psychiatrist with a speciality in
dementias. Once there, its common to have a number of other tests,
such as various kinds of head scans. At the same time, my MIL also had
a comprehensive assessment of her deficits - they wanted to know
exactly how impaired she was, but also in what areas, since different
causes of dementia can cause completely different sets of deficits -
and the resulting deficits result in characteristic behaviour
patterns.

Essentially, AD is only diagnosed by ruling out everything else it can
be, because although they are getting closer with various kinds of
scans, the only way to be 100% sure would be a brain biopsy, rarely
done for obvious reasons!

Just to give you an idea of what they are looking for and trying to
rule out, here is a list of things that can cause dementia, or
dementia like issues (and its not a complete list, just some of the
biggies!)

Degenerative

Alzheimer's Disease
Parkinson's Disease
Dementia with Lewy Bodies
Progressive Supranuclear Palsy
Multiple System Atrophy
Huntington's Disease
Pick's Disease
Frontotemporal (chromosome 17) Dementia
Corticobasal Ganglionic Degeneration
The Parkinsonian Dementia Complex of Guam
Dementia Lacking Distinctive Histological Features

Vascular

Multiple Infarction Dementia
Strategic Infarction Dementia
Lacunar State
Binswanger's Disease (Subcortical Ischemic Encephalopathy)
Vasculitis
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Infection

Fungal Meningitis
Syphilis
AIDS Dementia
Creutzfeldt-Jacob Disease (and other Prion diseases)
Post Herpes Simplex Encephalitis

Psychiatric

Depression
Alcohol abuse
Drug use or abuse (or interactions/side effects)
Personality Disorder
Anxiety Disorder

Toxic/Metabolic

B12 deficiency
Thyroid deficiency
System failure including liver, renal, cardiac, respiratory
Heavy metal toxicity
Toxin exposure e.g. glue sniffing

Trauma

Subdural hematoma
Closed head injury
Open head injury
Pugilistic brain injury
Anoxic brain injury

Tumor

Glioblastoma
Lymphoma
Metastatic tumor

Other

Symptomatic Hydrocephalus (Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus)

Hope this helps

Mary G.

*****

(end quoted material)
Signature


Best Regards,

Evelyn
(to reply to me personally, remove 'sox')

Gwen Love - 19 Jan 2006 04:48 GMT
Anthony, the neurologist asked if my husand had had a head injury because
that could contribute to AD.  He did have one in his middle teens.
Gwen

>>There are quite a few things that seem to increase the odds of getting it.
>>Head injuries, not using ones mind much in life, diabetes increases the
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Run away with me; I can make you unhappy.
James Semmel - 19 Jan 2006 17:29 GMT
Evelyn,

Actually, thus far nobody has found anything wrong with my discovery.
You said it has no merit, but for what reason?  What have I overlooked?
What flaw does it have?

If there's something obviously wrong with my discovery or treatment,
then please tell me what it is so that I can make refinements or
corrections.

Thanks,
james
James Semmel - 22 Jan 2006 18:30 GMT
Evelyn,

I'm genuinely interested in why you don't see any merit to my
shoe-Alzheimer's discovery.  Did I overlook something?  Did I get
something wrong?  These points are important to me so that I can make
the necessary refinements.

Please let me know.  Thanks,

james
Anthony Shipley - 19 Jan 2006 00:46 GMT
>Evelyn,
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>years ago, wasn't that old for her time.  She was among the first
>children growing up wearing a modern, manufactured shoe.

Given the frequent comments about the difficulty of diagnosing A.D., how do we
know Alzheimer was right?

anthony shipley

Run away with me; I can make you unhappy.
James Semmel - 19 Jan 2006 17:33 GMT
Anthony,

Dr. Alzheimer was the first to use a microscope in analyzing brain
tissue from a patient with the disease.  He performed his studies when
my grandmother was a little girl.

james
Anthony Shipley - 18 Jan 2006 04:04 GMT
>Anthony,
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>will be experiencing AD at younger ages, and so the 21st century will
>see even more people with dementia.

I see what you mean....... but we could also claim that A.D. is a result of
chemicals in paint, glue, preservatives, kids having to carry heavy knapsacks
and prophylactic condoms. More likely, it was all that time kneeling in church
that caused A.D.

Even the fumes given off by car tyres and fuel. Does removing a man's foreskin
reduce he liklihood of developing A.D. (is weight a factor?).

anthony shipley

Run away with me; I can make you unhappy.
Evelyn Ruut - 18 Jan 2006 12:07 GMT
>>Anthony,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> foreskin
> reduce he liklihood of developing A.D. (is weight a factor?).

Anthony, you may have been diagnosed with AD but you are an intelligent guy.
:-)
Signature


Best Regards,

Evelyn
(to reply to me personally, remove 'sox')

James Semmel - 18 Jan 2006 18:29 GMT
Anthony,

You bring up many possibilities as the cause of Alzheimer's disease,
but the shoe stands out as the most overlooked.  The shoe is the only
thing capable of changing the essence of what it means to be human,
i.e., to have a foot.  AD is all about losing what it means to be
human, and it seems to me that the shoe is the only object capable of
such a 'feet'.

The other primates have a brain, a heart, a stomach, and other
features.  But none have a foot with a big toe that points ahead for
walking.  We must question what happens to the body when the position
of that big toe changes.

james
June - 18 Jan 2006 19:15 GMT
> Anthony,
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> james

Ok Troll enough already.   Anyone can type James Semmel into google and see
all the diseases this idiot has come up with that are caused by shoes.
Everything from Crohn's Disease to Osteoporosis.   Get a life and get
lost!!!!
Evelyn Ruut - 18 Jan 2006 19:31 GMT
>> Anthony,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> Everything from Crohn's Disease to Osteoporosis.   Get a life and get
> lost!!!!

I cannot for the life of me understand what these wackos get out of being a
troll......

OK I will grant you that some are genuinely crazy (as in psychotic), but I
wonder how it is that these guys don't know how stupid their ideas sound.
Geez, I could invent a better wacko theory without half trying!
Signature


Best Regards,

Evelyn
(to reply to me personally, remove 'sox')

Anthony Shipley - 19 Jan 2006 01:04 GMT
>OK I will grant you that some are genuinely crazy (as in psychotic), but I
>wonder how it is that these guys don't know how stupid their ideas sound.
>Geez, I could invent a better wacko theory without half trying!

You're on!

:-)

anthony shipley

Run away with me; I can make you unhappy.
June - 19 Jan 2006 21:36 GMT
> I cannot for the life of me understand what these wackos get out of being
> a troll......
>
> OK I will grant you that some are genuinely crazy (as in psychotic), but I
> wonder how it is that these guys don't know how stupid their ideas sound.
> Geez, I could invent a better wacko theory without half trying!

I got this e-mail today perhaps James could figure out what's behind some of
these conundrums and leave us alone:

IDLE THOUGHTS OF A RETIRED PERSON

I planted some birdseed. A bird came  up. Now I don't know what to feed it.

I had amnesia once -- or  twice.

I went to San Francisco. I found someone's heart. Now  what?

Protons have mass? I didn't even know they were  Catholic.

All I ask is a chance to prove that money can't make me  happy.

If the world were a logical place, men would ride horses  sidesaddle.

What is a "free" gift? Aren't all gifts free?

They told me I was gullible ... and I  believed them.

Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he  grows
up, he'll never be able to merge his car onto a freeway.

Two can live as cheaply as one... for half as long.

Experience is the thing you have left when everything else is  gone.

What if there were no hypothetical questions?

The shampoo promised me extra body and  I gained three pounds.

One nice thing about egotists: They  don't talk about other people.

When the only tool you own is a  hammer, every problem begins to look  like
a 20 penny nail.

A flashlight is a case for holding dead batteries.

What was the greatest thing before sliced bread? Hmmmm?

My weight is perfect for my height --  which varies.

I used to be indecisive. Now I'm not sure.

The cost of living hasn't affected its  popularity.

How can there be self-help "groups"?

Is there another word for  synonym?

Where do forest rangers go to "get away from it all"?

The speed of time is one-second per  second.

Is it possible to be totally partial?

What's another word for thesaurus?

Is Marx's tomb a communist plot?

If swimming is so good for your  figure, how do you explain whales?

Show me a man with both feet firmly on  the ground, and I'll show you a man
who can't get his pants off.

It's not an optical illusion. It just looks like one.

Is it my imagination, or do buffalo  wings taste like chicken?

.........June
Gwen Love - 19 Jan 2006 22:38 GMT
June, I like those.  Had seen some of them but enjoyed them again too.
Gwen

>> I cannot for the life of me understand what these wackos get out of being
>> a troll......
[quoted text clipped - 75 lines]
>
> .........June
Anthony Shipley - 19 Jan 2006 01:03 GMT
>You bring up many possibilities as the cause of Alzheimer's disease,
>but the shoe stands out as the most overlooked.  The shoe is the only
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>walking.  We must question what happens to the body when the position
>of that big toe changes.

James, you obviously belong to that species of ape that has its foot firmly
parked in the other end of its leg.

anthony shipley

Run away with me; I can make you unhappy.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.