Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Alzheimer's / November 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Mobile Robots for Alzheimers care?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
alta_56 - 08 Nov 2005 09:11 GMT
Could this mobile robot really help caregivers of people with
Alzheimers?  It almost sounds too good to be true.  This robot, called
a CareBot, has verbal interaction built in and can answer the same
questions over and over again.  The website
(http://www.geckosystems.com) says that the CareBot can act as a
"surrogate short-term memory" with verbal reminders along with
answering questions.  It also has remote viewing capabilities from the
internet.  It self-navigates and follows a person automatically.  Has
anyone heard anything about this CareBot?  What do you think about it?
Karen - 08 Nov 2005 13:21 GMT
Okay, now my MIL could be telling the truth in her reality and mine when she
says something keeps following her.  :-)  I don't think I could come up with
a better way to really panic most ALZ people I know (my MIL and the people
in her care facility).  As their memory unravels, there would be no
references for them to relate to a robot that follows them unless they
remember Orson Wells and his War of the Worlds broadcast.

OTOH, I'll bet the insurance companies would think it's a great idea.

Karen

> Could this mobile robot really help caregivers of people with
> Alzheimers?  It almost sounds too good to be true.  This robot, called
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> internet.  It self-navigates and follows a person automatically.  Has
> anyone heard anything about this CareBot?  What do you think about it?
Beth Heimlich - 08 Nov 2005 14:00 GMT
Karen,  I agree most ALZ folks would really be spooked by a robot.  But
I beg to differ with you on the insurance companies.  Unless LTC
coverage is involved, they would not be interested unless it served some
sort of medical purpose.  A good part of insurance efforts are directed
in delineating medical vs. custodial care.  This is more likely to
appeal to families--sort of like transport wheelchairs or elevating
recliners that families often decide are needed, but the medical
establishment almost never certified as a medical need.

Beth, Physical Therapist.
Karen - 09 Nov 2005 01:37 GMT
Actually, it was the LTC insurance companies I thought of but I suspect they
wouldn't want the liability of requiring it instead of a better solution
(and almost any other solution would be better for someone with
Alzheimer's).

Curiously enough, I can see it being advantageous with small children when
they get to that age where you want to know when they're awake or when you
_think_ they are playing quietly.  Not so that they can be left alone but
just to keep an eye on them in a large house and alert you if they are on
the prowl and maybe (if Mom is netsurfing) generate a pop-up window of
what's going on.  But then kids are still discovering reality so there isn't
a 60 year bank of experience to tell them it's an oddity.  They'd probably
name it and try to pet it like the family dog.  They should nick name it K-9
after the one on Dr. Who.  :-)

Danger, young Robinson!

Karen

> Karen,  I agree most ALZ folks would really be spooked by a robot.  But
> I beg to differ with you on the insurance companies.  Unless LTC
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Beth, Physical Therapist.
alta_56 - 08 Nov 2005 17:29 GMT
What insurance companies would that be?  I've never seen one that is
receptive to cutting edge technology in order to keep people out of
hospitals and nursing homes.
June - 08 Nov 2005 14:07 GMT
> Could this mobile robot really help caregivers of people with
> Alzheimers?  It almost sounds too good to be true.  This robot, called
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> internet.  It self-navigates and follows a person automatically.  Has
> anyone heard anything about this CareBot?  What do you think about it?

Sounds more like science fiction than anything else.   I sure don't see my
mother adjusting to such a thing.    Talk about big brother.   The ability
for someone to abuse this technology is a little frightening to me!   And
no, I'm not a techo phobe just worried about privacy issues......June
alta_56 - 08 Nov 2005 17:36 GMT
It looks like the company's focus is safety and security.  I think they
would have to have some way to prevent people abusing the tech.  All
the banks and credit card companies have security systems for their
web-based services.
Evelyn Ruut - 08 Nov 2005 14:35 GMT
> Could this mobile robot really help caregivers of people with
> Alzheimers?  It almost sounds too good to be true.  This robot, called
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> internet.  It self-navigates and follows a person automatically.  Has
> anyone heard anything about this CareBot?  What do you think about it?

When my mother in law imagined she had a baby and that people were keeping
it from her, she couldn't be fooled by a doll.

She couldn't relate to any mechanical things anymore, not even turning the
TV on and off or adjusting the volume or changing the channel.

Nothing will ever be able to replace a real thinking human being in the
realm of caregiving.

Signature

Best Regards,
Evelyn

(to reply to me personally, remove 'sox')

alta_56 - 08 Nov 2005 17:42 GMT
I wonder if the robot's verbal interaction system could be programmed
to turn on the TV or whatever.  That would completely take the
mechanical part out of the loop.

It doesn't seem like they want to replace human beings, just make it
life a whole lot easier and less stressful for caregivers and families.
I think if my mom or I could check on my grandmother from our desk at
work, it would take a lot of worry off our shoulders.
Tumbleweed - 08 Nov 2005 18:19 GMT
>I wonder if the robot's verbal interaction system could be programmed
> to turn on the TV or whatever.  That would completely take the
> mechanical part out of the loop.
>
> It doesn't seem like they want to replace human beings, just make it
> life a whole lot easier and less stressful for caregivers and families.

start;
"Whats that thing, what did it say?"
"Explanation"
(1 minute later) "Whats that thing, what did it say?"
"Explanation"
(1 minute later) "Whats that thing, what did it say?"
"Explanation"
Back to start.

yeh thats really going to cut down on caregiver stress :-)

> I think if my mom or I could check on my grandmother from our desk at
> work, it would take a lot of worry off our shoulders.

web cam(s)...though ISTM that if she *needs* that level of checking up, she
shouldn't be by herself.

It also occurs to me that watching her switch on the gas but not light it,
leave  the house and not come back, invite strangers into the house, put a
BM in the fridge, leave a pan of soup to boil to nothing and the handle
catch fire*, etc etc etc etc, might not actually be very conducive to a
worry-free day at work!!

Signature

Tumbleweed

* all behaviours reported here at some time

email replies not necessary but to contact use;
tumbleweednews at hotmail dot com

Lesanne - 08 Nov 2005 23:35 GMT
Now that is an entertaining answer ;)

Signature

Lesanne

>
>>I wonder if the robot's verbal interaction system could be programmed
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> catch fire*, etc etc etc etc, might not actually be very conducive to a
> worry-free day at work!!
Anthony Shipley - 09 Nov 2005 05:34 GMT
>It also occurs to me that watching her switch on the gas but not light it,
>leave  the house and not come back, invite strangers into the house, put a
>BM in the fridge, leave a pan of soup to boil to nothing and the handle
>catch fire*, etc etc etc etc, might not actually be very conducive to a
>worry-free day at work!!

Please don't forget to mention my -- now quite long ago -- putting a plastic
electric kettle on the stove's gas ring.

Let me assure you, the smoke is not so nice!

Happy to say we seen to have that problem sorted now :-)

--
2 + 2 = 5 for sufficiently large values of 2.
Octavia - 09 Nov 2005 16:39 GMT
>>It also occurs to me that watching her switch on the gas but not light it,
>>leave  the house and not come back, invite strangers into the house, put a
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> --
> 2 + 2 = 5 for sufficiently large values of 2.

Oh, pew - burned plastic is nasty!

Every time I cook, I have to remember to remove the knobs from the stove. I
don't bother turning the burners anymore so they mostly stay hooked up. Just
can't keep the knobs on because I never know when she might decide to go put
a pot on... It really saddens me she can't cook anymore. There were some of
her dishes she'd make I wish I knew how to do, even though it wouldn't come
out the same. And now, those goodies are gone forever:(

Glad you got it sorted out. Amazing all the little ways you have to change
so many things in the house.
Evelyn Ruut - 10 Nov 2005 01:00 GMT
>>>It also occurs to me that watching her switch on the gas but not light
>>>it,
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> Glad you got it sorted out. Amazing all the little ways you have to change
> so many things in the house.

Octavia, I only just found some of my mother in laws favorite recipe goodies
online.   She taught me how to make a few dishes, but there was one I really
liked, and I got it on a Russian cooking website, of all things.   Her
Estonian Pirukas.    They were little meat filled dumplings, baked in a
yeast dough     Sort of like Pirogies, but these were baked in a yeast
dough.    Delicious.    Keep looking, and maybe you will find the recipes!

Signature

Best Regards,
Evelyn

(to reply to me personally, remove 'sox')

Anthony Shipley - 09 Nov 2005 04:08 GMT
>It doesn't seem like they want to replace human beings, just make it
>life a whole lot easier and less stressful for caregivers and families.
> I think if my mom or I could check on my grandmother from our desk at
>work, it would take a lot of worry off our shoulders.

That is very good comment.

My wife recently bought a new high tech TV which I am __slowly__ getting used
to. It has 2 remotes, one for the TV and one for the router and endless buttons.

Definitely not suitable for somebody with A.D.!

--
2 + 2 = 5 for sufficiently large values of 2.
Florence A - 11 Nov 2005 01:28 GMT
The tec stuff is really hard to keep up with. There should be an ERACE
button on the human brain (no, not ALZ as a substitude)
I fell this past week so could not sleep from pain,,  Last night an
informercial about Vonnage beat out the news....fascinating---..Seems if
you have broadband or cable you could could have local & long distance
calling thru your TV & it would be connected to your landline &
cellphone.  a router is part of the deal.free excep p & h.  somehow the
computer is involved
I am so far behind the times...Is this so????
Florence
Karen - 12 Nov 2005 04:05 GMT
I know people that have their phones set up this way.  In fact, there was a
flap in the news not long ago because people set their phones up this way
for the break on long distance calls but don't always check to see if the
new provider subscribes to 911 services.  Apparently broadband and cable
services don't have to subscribe to 911 services like a land line phone
service.  It's been an issue when someone kicks in their door or a member of
the family has a health crisis and they can't dial 911.

Of course, no one keeps the phone number of the police/ambulance/fire
department on their fridge anymore.  That's _so_ old school.  :-)

Karen

> The tec stuff is really hard to keep up with. There should be an ERACE
> button on the human brain (no, not ALZ as a substitude)
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> I am so far behind the times...Is this so????
> Florence
Evelyn Ruut - 12 Nov 2005 12:52 GMT
>I know people that have their phones set up this way.  In fact, there was a
> flap in the news not long ago because people set their phones up this way
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Karen

911 made it all so much simpler :-)

But I still do keep the actual phone number of our local town police nearby.
Came in handy when a strange dog materialized on my lawn.   No need to
bother 911 about that.   Turned out it was the new pet of a neighbor who had
an aversion to using a leash.   Still does.

Signature

Best Regards,
Evelyn

(to reply to me personally, remove 'sox')

Karen - 13 Nov 2005 15:15 GMT
Evelyn, I do too.  When I call 911 the first question they ask is "Is this
an emergency?"  I don't consider it an  emergency if one of the neighbors
insists on rattling my windows with his music at midnight, but I still want
the cops to be the ones to handle it.  It only becomes an emergency around 2
AM when I'm desperate enough to go over there and handle the situation
myself.  :-)

Seriously, IMO everyone should have the direct numbers to the various
police, fire, etc. because when the 911 call center goes down (and any
computerized call center can go down) it's good to have a backup plan.  But
then I tend to be a belt and suspenders type.

Karen

> 911 made it all so much simpler :-)
>
> But I still do keep the actual phone number of our local town police nearby.
> Came in handy when a strange dog materialized on my lawn.   No need to
> bother 911 about that.   Turned out it was the new pet of a neighbor who had
> an aversion to using a leash.   Still does.
Anthony Shipley - 09 Nov 2005 04:27 GMT
>I wonder if the robot's verbal interaction system could be programmed
>to turn on the TV or whatever.  That would completely take the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> I think if my mom or I could check on my grandmother from our desk at
>work, it would take a lot of worry off our shoulders.

I seem to recall, from the distant past --some 5 to ten years ago, maybe even
longer-- using voice input. At the time, I was suffering from sore hands from
overuse of the keyboard and insufficient breaks.

The medium at the time, might have been earlier than usenet/web. I'd be really
pleased if somebody could identify what protocol I'm referring to.

...or maybe I'm imagingin it all -- Yes Gwen, I might be older than you!!

--
2 + 2 = 5 for sufficiently large values of 2.
Ronny TX - 10 Nov 2005 00:14 GMT

Re: Mobile Robots for Alzheimers care?  

Group: alt.support.alzheimers Date: Tue, Nov 8, 2005, 9:42am (CST-2)
From: alta_56@yahoo.com (alta_56)
I wonder if the robot's verbal interaction system could be programmed to
turn on the TV or whatever. That would completely take the mechanical
part out of the loop.
It doesn't seem like they want to replace human beings, just make it
life a whole lot easier and less stressful for caregivers and families.
  I think if my mom or I could check on my grandmother from our desk
at work, it would take a lot of worry off our shoulders.

Ronny:
Well now,that is one good point;but don't they have fixed devises now
where you could do that by closed circuit TV?
A R Pickett - 08 Nov 2005 22:41 GMT
I think most responders to this thread are right on the money, the person
who came up with this idea has absolutely no idea what the care of a person
with any degree of dementia is really like.

And I know that none of the situations described are funny.

Yet I have been sitting here giggling, first at the complete idiocy of the
original concept, and then at the "to the point" responses posted by several
of you.

Still learning a great deal and benefiting a great deal from lurking.  Off
tomorrow to Iowa & Minnesota to spend the weekend with my Dad and other
family members.  (My dad has been diagnosed with vascular dementia and can
be pretty flaky much of the time)  I told my sister I would help him plow
through what, if anything, he needs to do re Medicare RX plan.  Called his
insurance carrier today (without a release to discuss his plan with them)
and I knew they could give me no specifics. I didn't ask them for specifics.
But I nearly had to crawl through the phone and slap the lady upside the
head to get her to answer my questions about their policies in general.

Sadly will also be attending the memorial service for a little boy born to
my niece a week ago Sunday who did not survive.

Thanks to all of you for ASA.  You have all been a huge help to me, and I am
not even the caregiver on the scene!

Signature

A R Pickett aka Woodstock

"Sometimes the facts threaten the truth"

Amos Oz, prize winning Israeli author

Read my book reviews at:
http://www.booksnbytes.com/reviews/_idx_ws_all_byauth.html

Remove lower case "e" to respond

Evelyn Ruut - 09 Nov 2005 00:03 GMT
>I think most responders to this thread are right on the money, the person
> who came up with this idea has absolutely no idea what the care of a
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> am
> not even the caregiver on the scene!

So sad about your niece's child.

Hope you have a good and productive visit with your family!

Signature

Best Regards,
Evelyn

(to reply to me personally, remove 'sox')

Ronny TX - 10 Nov 2005 00:19 GMT
Re: Mobile Robots for Alzheimers care?  
Group: alt.support.alzheimers Date: Tue, Nov 8, 2005, 10:41pm (CST+6)
From: WOODeSTOCK_AP@PReODIGeY.NET (A R Pickett)
(snip)
Sadly will also be attending the memorial service for a little boy born
to my niece a week ago Sunday who did not survive. (snip)

Ronny:
Sorry to hear of that happening! :-(
Tumbleweed - 08 Nov 2005 17:28 GMT
> Could this mobile robot really help caregivers of people with
> Alzheimers?  It almost sounds too good to be true.  This robot, called
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> internet.  It self-navigates and follows a person automatically.  Has
> anyone heard anything about this CareBot?  What do you think about it?

It sounds too dumb to be true! If it was invented for Az patients, it was
done so by someone with no experience of dealing with the condition. It'll
either frighten the beejesus out of them *every few minutes*, or cause them
to go looking for someone to explain what the funny thing following them
around is....every minute or so, or they will take a mallet to it as soon as
it speaks or moves, or they will ignore it :-)

A week or so ago I inadvertently left a GPS unit switched on in my home, and
forgot it was there. 10 minutes later, there I was typing away in the house,
all alone, no radio or anything else on, so it was very quiet, and all of a
sudden a voice said loudly 'turn left when possible'; I nearly had a heart
attack!! :-)

Now imagine that happening to you all the time, if you dont know what a
robot is or have any concept of one, where the voice is coming from, and why
a strange metal thing is following you. I imagine the devices will need to
be quite sturdy :-)

Signature

Tumbleweed

email replies not necessary but to contact use;
tumbleweednews at hotmail dot com

Anthony Shipley - 09 Nov 2005 05:45 GMT
>It sounds too dumb to be true! If it was invented for Az patients, it was
>done so by someone with no experience of dealing with the condition. It'll
>either frighten the beejesus out of them *every few minutes*, or cause them
>to go looking for someone to explain what the funny thing following them
>around is....every minute or so, or they will take a mallet to it as soon as
>it speaks or moves, or they will ignore it :-)

To be fair, any such device is more likely to sophisticated to have some
utility. For example, we would expect a reasonable quality of read speech as
well as quality verbal interpretation including common accents. That is,
probably no worse than the average citizen (O.K., I am being more optimistic
than usual but I expect we'll get there soon. Pure speculation, but we might
even, by then, be able to generate the actual speech patterns of, for example, a
departed loved one.

Speculation, to be sure, but the reality is that some such communication
improvements might very well be just around the corner.

I just hope that my split fingernail gets better by then :-)

>A week or so ago I inadvertently left a GPS unit switched on in my home, and
>forgot it was there. 10 minutes later, there I was typing away in the house,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>a strange metal thing is following you. I imagine the devices will need to
>be quite sturdy :-)

--
2 + 2 = 5 for sufficiently large values of 2.
Tumbleweed - 09 Nov 2005 15:52 GMT
>>It sounds too dumb to be true! If it was invented for Az patients, it was
>>done so by someone with no experience of dealing with the condition. It'll
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> optimistic
> than usual but I expect we'll get there soon.

Thats equivalent to saying, if the device was really good, it would be
really good.
Sure,when there is a human-equivalent one, that didnt get worn down by
repetition, that understood what you wanted, could deal with dangerous
situations, calm down agitated patients, that would be good. This device
isnt it and isn't even close to be 1% of 1% of 1% of what would be needed,
which is ... a person.  We already have those.

We are a *long* way from meaning recognition except for very basic speech
recognition stuff, and nowhere near able to interpret random utterances of
AZ patients and decide what to do.  A few weeks back one of the residents at
my dads home (never seen her before) wanted me to hurry up so she could make
the dinner for me and her kids befre she went to the office. Hows a machine
going to deal with that?

> Pure speculation, but we might
> even, by then, be able to generate the actual speech patterns of, for
> example, a
> departed loved one.

thats *really* going to confuse the heck out of someone with Az!!
"My husbands been killed and replaced by a metal contraption" AAAAARRRGGGH!

Signature

Tumbleweed

email replies not necessary but to contact use;
tumbleweednews at hotmail dot com

Ronny TX - 10 Nov 2005 00:11 GMT
Re: Mobile Robots for Alzheimers care? > Group: alt.support.alzheimers
Date: Tue,
Nov 8, 2005, 5:28pm (CST+6) From:
thisaccountneverread@yahoo.com
(Tumbleweed)
"alta_56"  wrote in message news:1131441108.366659.271880@g49g2000cw
a.googlegroups.com...
snip:

Tumbleweed:
It sounds too dumb to be true! If it was
invented for Az patients, it was done so
by someone with no experience of dealing
with the condition. It'll either
frighten the beejesus out of them *every
few minutes*, or cause them to go
looking for someone to explain what the
funny thing following them around
is....every minute or so, or they will
take a mallet to it as soon as it speaks
or moves, or they will ignore it :-)
A week or so ago I inadvertently left a
GPS unit switched on in my home, and
forgot it was there. 10 minutes later,
there I was typing away in the house,
all alone, no radio or anything else on,
so it was very quiet, and all of a
sudden a voice said loudly 'turn left
when possible'; I nearly had a heart
attack!! :-)
Now imagine that happening to you all
the time, if you dont know what a robot
is or have any concept of one, where the
voice is coming from, and why a strange
metal thing is following you. I imagine
the devices will need to be quite sturdy:-)
Tumbleweed

Ronny:
No doubt my Mom would tell that little robot in no uncertain terms that
he wasn't her boss! :-) And if he didn't listen,she might just whop him
a few times with her 4 point metal cane! LoL
Mary_Gordon@tvo.org - 08 Nov 2005 17:58 GMT
All I can say is it would have freaked out my mother in law entirely. A
person with memory problems is unlikely to remember what the heck the
thing is so you might get a fresh freak out daily.

I also doubt that verbal reminders are going to be hugely effective
coming from a machine (i.e. would YOU trust someone with AD to take
their medication alone, just prompted by a machine? I did that once
with my MIL in mid AD by calling her several times a day to take her
pills at specific times, and the results were disasterous (she mixed up
pills, took more than she should etc. etc.)

My MIL got extremely upset about her television - thought people could
see and hear her via the set, put clothes over it to protect her
modesty, got upset about it causing a fire when she wasn't sure she had
turned it off (and her answer to this was to unscrew every light bulb
in her apartment). I can just see what she'd do with this horrible
thing following her around talking to her and her not being able to
turn it off. Screaming flip out.

Mary
Anthony Shipley - 09 Nov 2005 05:47 GMT
>My MIL got extremely upset about her television - thought people could
>see and hear her via the set, put clothes over it to protect her
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>thing following her around talking to her and her not being able to
>turn it off. Screaming flip out.

A favourite expression of mine used to be "Expect the impossilbe!" Seems like
that's the best we can do.

--
2 + 2 = 5 for sufficiently large values of 2.
Tumbleweed - 09 Nov 2005 15:54 GMT
>>My MIL got extremely upset about her television - thought people could
>>see and hear her via the set, put clothes over it to protect her
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> like
> that's the best we can do.

Maybe that is a diagnostic for Az then as my dad was always saying that. May
a yellow spotted dolphin fall out of the sky onto your head.

Signature

Tumbleweed

email replies not necessary but to contact use;
tumbleweednews at hotmail dot com

Octavia - 08 Nov 2005 18:03 GMT
LOL - oh, yeah, right. My MIL would freak out in 12 different directions. I
can just hear her telling it "Go to Hell" & "sh.t on you":)

> Could this mobile robot really help caregivers of people with
> Alzheimers?  It almost sounds too good to be true.  This robot, called
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> internet.  It self-navigates and follows a person automatically.  Has
> anyone heard anything about this CareBot?  What do you think about it?
Lesanne - 08 Nov 2005 23:38 GMT
I am sorry I am about to die laughing. I needed that about now. Momma is
over there in her chair saying "what's so funny?" And yeah, I know it is not
Supposed to be funny, but I can see Momma using the thing to try to batter
her way out the front door. She has taken to shoving furniture all over the
place. She has recently lost interest in all the activities we set up for
her.

Signature

Lesanne

> LOL - oh, yeah, right. My MIL would freak out in 12 different directions.
> I can just hear her telling it "Go to Hell" & "sh.t on you":)
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>> internet.  It self-navigates and follows a person automatically.  Has
>> anyone heard anything about this CareBot?  What do you think about it?
Octavia - 09 Nov 2005 16:44 GMT
:)))
Oh my, I feel for you. Can't be any fun having to put the furniture back...
The chairs at the dinette table has wheels. I suppose if my MIL started in
on the furniture, those things would be all over the house.

>I am sorry I am about to die laughing. I needed that about now. Momma is
>over there in her chair saying "what's so funny?" And yeah, I know it is
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>>> internet.  It self-navigates and follows a person automatically.  Has
>>> anyone heard anything about this CareBot?  What do you think about it?
Lesanne - 09 Nov 2005 19:33 GMT
I don't mind. I am a nurse and we modified the entire house years ago, based
upon things I read. We have nothing but tile floors, no furniture that I
cannot bear to see damaged, etc. (well not specifically true the furniture I
cherish is locked in my own bedrooms)

Signature

Lesanne

> :)))
> Oh my, I feel for you. Can't be any fun having to put the furniture
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>>>> internet.  It self-navigates and follows a person automatically.  Has
>>>> anyone heard anything about this CareBot?  What do you think about it?
Anthony Shipley - 09 Nov 2005 05:48 GMT
>LOL - oh, yeah, right. My MIL would freak out in 12 different directions. I
>can just hear her telling it "Go to Hell" & "sh.t on you":)

At least she's only at the threatening stage.......

:-p

--
2 + 2 = 5 for sufficiently large values of 2.
Deborah - 09 Nov 2005 00:42 GMT
> Could this mobile robot really help caregivers of people with
> Alzheimers?  It almost sounds too good to be true.  This robot, called
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> internet.  It self-navigates and follows a person automatically.  Has
> anyone heard anything about this CareBot?  What do you think about it?

I have to say that I agree in the strongest possible ways with the
majority of the responses to this idea. It's so totally counter-intuitive
it's unbelievable. Well-intentioned, I'd guess -- to take the charitable
view -- but it surely cannot be a product of the imagination of anyone who
has ever dealt with dementia on a personal level for any meaningful amount
of time. Sorry, alta_56.

It's a non-starter, as our dear left-pondians might say. Heck, *I'd* say
it's a non-starter...*much* more potential for harm than good. Some far,
far day, perhaps, there may come a satisfactory substitute for human
interaction. It's not the least bit likely any of us will live to see it.
(Thank heavens.)

Deborah
Pat Stewart - 09 Nov 2005 06:50 GMT
Man oh man!  I printed out the webpage and put it in our employee's lounge
at the A/L where I work.  I added the message - Danger! Danger! Danger
Caregivers!  You can be Replaced!

Anybody but me notice that the robots resemble something out of the Jetsons?

Until it can give a shower, wipe a soiled bottom, hold a scared AD patient
in their arms and wipe their tears away,figure out who is wearing the wrong
glasses, or trying to put their dentures in upside down, why Mrs. A is
wearing Mr. B's underpants,  this thing will never replace the human contact
that people with AD need and respond to.

Really bad idea, but really cool looking robots!

Patty
> Could this mobile robot really help caregivers of people with
> Alzheimers?  It almost sounds too good to be true.  This robot, called
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> internet.  It self-navigates and follows a person automatically.  Has
> anyone heard anything about this CareBot?  What do you think about it?
Octavia - 09 Nov 2005 17:32 GMT
> Really bad idea, but really cool looking robots!

Yep:)) Maybe they can find another use for those guys:)

What a great glimpse into what your life is like at an A/L faciltiy.
Thanks:)

> Man oh man!  I printed out the webpage and put it in our employee's lounge
> at the A/L where I work.  I added the message - Danger! Danger! Danger
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>> internet.  It self-navigates and follows a person automatically.  Has
>> anyone heard anything about this CareBot?  What do you think about it?
alta_56 - 09 Nov 2005 20:02 GMT
>It also occurs to me that watching her switch on the gas but not light it,
>leave  the house and not come back, invite strangers into the house, put a
>BM in the fridge, leave a pan of soup to boil to nothing and the handle
>catch fire*, etc etc etc etc, might not actually be very conducive to a
>worry-free day at work!!

I would hope if you saw any of this over the webcam you would be just a
little bit proactive and call the person and tell them to 'turn off the
gas' or 'take the soup off'.  If calling them did not work then you
could call a neighbor or another person nearby to assist.

>Man oh man!  I printed out the webpage and put it in our employee's lounge
>at the A/L where I work.  I added the message - Danger! Danger! Danger
>Caregivers!  You can be Replaced!

I don't think everyone has a clear picture about what this robot is
supposed to do.  It is not for Assisted Living facilities although I
can see applications for it there too.  It is meant to be used in the
home and is not meant to replace the caregiver.  It is a tool to
augment the level of care provided by our caregivers whether it is a
son or daughter who lives 200 miles away or just across town
or a professional hired by the elderly parent or their family.

>Sure,when there is a human-equivalent one, that didnt get worn down by
>repetition

A robot would not get worn down by repetition - it will answer the same
question with the pre-programmed answer as many times as the person
could ask it.  And seeing as most elderly people ask the same things
over and over every day it would not be hard to program in the answers.

>could deal with dangerous situations

>From what I've read on the website this robot can call 911 or
pre-programmed emergency numbers when the person does not respond to
'are you okay?' or when the person says 'call 911'.  It can also detect
fires and report break-ins and even film the intruder.  I can just
imagine a burgler's face if a robot's voice came out of the darkness
saying "Intruder alert!  The police have been called and I am now video
taping your every move!".

There is a story on their website at
http://www.geckosystems.com/products/grandma_carebot.php that gives
a pretty good description of what this CareBot is supposed to do.

>We are a *long* way from meaning recognition except for very basic speech
>recognition stuff,

Actually I have seen some research done with face recognition that can
determine a person's mood based on their facial expressions.  I have
also seen some research using speech recognition that could determine
whether the person was stressed or not based on their speech patterns.
Tumbleweed - 09 Nov 2005 22:30 GMT
> >It also occurs to me that watching her switch on the gas but not light
> >it,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> little bit proactive and call the person and tell them to 'turn off the
> gas' or 'take the soup off'.

You think they would know what a phone was? Or gas? Or soup? Or that they
wouldnt spill boiling soup over themselves?

If you feel you'd ever need to tell them that, you *really* shouldnt be
leaving them alone in the first place. And if they need that level of
watching, I cant imagine your employer is going to be too happy either!

> If calling them did not work then you
> could call a neighbor or another person nearby to assist.

"Hiya neighbour, can I have your phone number please as I'll be phoning you
10-20 times a day from work with some little chores I'd like you to do for
me in my house as I really would rather not be there myself".

>>Man oh man!  I printed out the webpage and put it in our employee's lounge
>>at the A/L where I work.  I added the message - Danger! Danger! Danger
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> son or daughter who lives 200 miles away or just across town
> or a professional hired by the elderly parent or their family.

Can you give an example? To take one thing you mentioned, (I think), I dont,
for example, see the point of spending several thousand dollars so an AZ
patient can be reminded to take their medicine by a mobile tape recorder.
Aside from the point that it will be more difficult to program that in, than
just to remind the Az patient yourself, >>>how would the robot know that the
medicines have been taken and in the correct dose?? <<<

You do know, dont you, that if you ask an Az patient to take their medicine,
chances are they'll have forgotten in the time it takes to walk into the
room where the tablets likely are? The reminder isnt the point, taking the
right medicine at the right dose is the point. The carebot can do the former
but not the latter, not even close, not even an inkling. Wasted your time &
money on that one.

>>Sure,when there is a human-equivalent one, that didnt get worn down by
>>repetition
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> could ask it.  And seeing as most elderly people ask the same things
> over and over every day it would not be hard to program in the answers.

Why would an Az patient who doesnt know what a robot is, ask it a question?
And they cant learn what a robot is, for obvious reasons.

>>could deal with dangerous situations
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> saying "Intruder alert!  The police have been called and I am now video
> taping your every move!".

I can just imagine the policeman's face when they have turned up for the
20th time that day because the Az patient wasnt in a chatty mood!

But good news, we have a really sharp picture of the stranger your mother
invited in who then beat her up. At least,we think we do but unfortunately
its in the robot that the stranger stole when they left.

> There is a story on their website at
> http://www.geckosystems.com/products/grandma_carebot.php that gives
> a pretty good description of what this CareBot is supposed to do.

You may have taken it that way, but its a 'story'. It even says so at the
top of the page.

>>We are a *long* way from meaning recognition except for very basic speech
>>recognition stuff,
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> also seen some research using speech recognition that could determine
> whether the person was stressed or not based on their speech patterns.

I've seen lots of research. And nothing that works in real life.

Spend the money on a couple of hours of home help a day.

I'm guessing you dont have any experience of dealing with a person with
anything more than the mildest level of dementia?

Signature

Tumbleweed

email replies not necessary but to contact use;
tumbleweednews at hotmail dot com

Ronny TX - 10 Nov 2005 00:32 GMT
I want one of those Carebot robots for me,not Mom! I need something to
remind me of all the things I need to be doing. :-) And when I went into
a room and forgot what I went to do,could the Carebot tell me please?!
LoL
Tumbleweed - 10 Nov 2005 07:27 GMT
>I want one of those Carebot robots for me,not Mom! I need something to
> remind me of all the things I need to be doing. :-) And when I went into
> a room and forgot what I went to do,could the Carebot tell me please?!
> LoL

it could as long as you *remembered* to program it to remind you to tell it
to tell you ...ummm, damn it I lost my thread what was I talking about?

I plan to patent two alternative devices used for memory recall, I name them
the 'pencil and calendar' and the 'pencil and notebook' systems.

Whilst I am waiting for the patents to come through, I wonder if you'd all
be so good as to send me 1c every time you use either of these systems. And
2c if you use a pen (the DeLuxe systems). Think of the money you'd save
compared to a carebot!

Signature

Tumbleweed

email replies not necessary but to contact use;
tumbleweednews at hotmail dot com

Octavia - 10 Nov 2005 15:49 GMT
LOL, I could use one also! A talking reminder list of things to do like
"tomorrow is garbage day, don't forget to gather the trash & put it out".

I can see where a bot like this would be helpful for some people, but not
for those with dementia.

>I want one of those Carebot robots for me,not Mom! I need something to
> remind me of all the things I need to be doing. :-) And when I went into
> a room and forgot what I went to do,could the Carebot tell me please?!
> LoL
Karen - 09 Nov 2005 23:59 GMT
> >It also occurs to me that watching her switch on the gas but not light it,
> >leave  the house and not come back, invite strangers into the house, put a
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> gas' or 'take the soup off'.  If calling them did not work then you
> could call a neighbor or another person nearby to assist.

My MIL wouldn't bother to go check because "she would never do something
like that" and if after some degree of pleading and coercion you were able
to get her to head off to do it, by the time she passed multiple distactions
in another room or two, she would have forgotten.  But I'm banking she
wouldn't tolerate it in the first place.  Mechanical things seem to irritate
ALZ people to a amazing level.

> I don't think everyone has a clear picture about what this robot is
> supposed to do.  It is not for Assisted Living facilities although I
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> son or daughter who lives 200 miles away or just across town
> or a professional hired by the elderly parent or their family.

You miss the point.  If a person is far enough along to need that level of
observation, they aren't likely to be safe to leave with only that level of
observation.

If you are trying to get feedback on this device for your own purposes,
you'd be yielding more productive input by volunteering for a few days at an
ALZ facility (night shift would be a good place to start).

If you are just running it up for comment, I'd say you've gotten it.  :-)

> A robot would not get worn down by repetition - it will answer the same
> question with the pre-programmed answer as many times as the person
> could ask it.  And seeing as most elderly people ask the same things
> over and over every day it would not be hard to program in the answers.

> >From what I've read on the website this robot can call 911 or
> pre-programmed emergency numbers when the person does not respond to
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> saying "Intruder alert!  The police have been called and I am now video
> taping your every move!".

Do you realize that by the definition of some police departments, the person
being monitored would be turned over to protective services for being left
unattended?  Monitored is not considered the same as attended by either
children or adult protective services.

> There is a story on their website at
> http://www.geckosystems.com/products/grandma_carebot.php that gives
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> also seen some research using speech recognition that could determine
> whether the person was stressed or not based on their speech patterns.

This brings up another point.  The facial expressions of ALZ people doesn't
always make sense.  My MIL can go into a violent rage over finding herself
in the shower room preparing to take a shower.  Give her 2 minutes and she
forgets about it.  Can the carebot handle the logical anomaly of expression
= murderous fury but situation = no threat?  Basically, how do you program a
logical creature to handle chaotic non-logic?

Karen
Evelyn Ruut - 10 Nov 2005 01:05 GMT
> >It also occurs to me that watching her switch on the gas but not light
> >it,
[quoted text clipped - 49 lines]
> also seen some research using speech recognition that could determine
> whether the person was stressed or not based on their speech patterns.

Dear Alta,

I think you mean very well and I surely don't want to rain on your parade,
but I honestly think it isn't going to work with a person who really has
dementia.    But keep up the good work, because someone has to be the
pioneer in these kinds of things.

Signature

Best Regards,
Evelyn

(to reply to me personally, remove 'sox')

Anthony Shipley - 10 Nov 2005 05:17 GMT
>Could this mobile robot really help caregivers of people with
>Alzheimers?  It almost sounds too good to be true.  This robot, called
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>internet.  It self-navigates and follows a person automatically.  Has
>anyone heard anything about this CareBot?  What do you think about it?

Look it from the perspective of somebody talking about horseless carriages....

--
2 + 2 = 5 for sufficiently large values of 2.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.