Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Alzheimer's / May 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Statins - a cure-all for the brain?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Dr. Harman - 22 Apr 2005 21:49 GMT
Menge T, Hartung HP, Stuve O.

Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, 505
Parnassus Avenue, Box 0114, San Francisco, California 94143-0114, USA.

'Statins' are 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase
inhibitors - oral cholesterol-lowering drugs that are used to treat
hypercholesterolaemia. It is widely accepted that statins have
anti-inflammatory effects that are independent of their ability to
lower cholesterol. Animal studies and observational clinical studies
have indicated that statins might also be effective in treating certain
neurological diseases - in particular, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer's
disease and ischaemic stroke. At present, however, results from ongoing
prospective, randomized clinical trials are not available.
Sharon Hope - 23 Apr 2005 02:32 GMT
Exactly, beagle dogs are a good predictor of statin cognitive adverse
effects.

From the Lipitor Prescribing Information:

http://www.lipitor.com/cwp/appmanager/lipitor/lipitorDesktop?_nfpb=true&_pageLab
el=prescribingInformation


CNS Toxicity

Brain hemorrhage was seen in a female dog treated for 3 months at 120
mg/kg/day. Brain hemorrhage and optic nerve vacuolation were seen in another
female dog that was sacrificed in moribund condition after 11 weeks of
escalating doses up to 280 mg/kg/day. The 120 mg/kg dose resulted in a
systemic exposure approximately 16 times the human plasma
area-under-the-curve (AUC, 0-24 hours) based on the maximum human dose of 80
mg/day. A single tonic convulsion was seen in each of 2 male dogs (one
treated at 10 mg/kg/day and one at 120 mg/kg/day) in a 2-year study. No CNS
lesions have been observed in mice after chronic treatment for up to 2 years
at doses up to 400 mg/kg/day or in rats at doses up to 100 mg/kg/day. These
doses were 6 to 11 times (mouse) and 8 to 16 times (rat) the human AUC
(0-24) based on the maximum recommended human dose of 80 mg/day.

CNS vascular lesions, characterized by perivascular hemorrhages, edema, and
mononuclear cell infiltration of perivascular spaces, have been observed in
dogs treated with other members of this class. A chemically similar drug in
this class produced optic nerve degeneration (Wallerian degeneration of
retinogeniculate fibers) in clinically normal dogs in a dose-dependent
fashion at a dose that produced plasma drug levels about 30 times higher
than the mean drug level in humans taking the highest recommended dose.

Sworn testimony from the Baycol trial in Corpus Christi, Texas.

From the trial transcript of the AM Session on 03-05-03, in the case Hollis
Haltom Vs. Bayer Corporation. Testifying under oath,., in response to the
plaintiff's attorney's question, "What is your current position at Bayer?",
LAWRENCE POSNER, M.D of BAYER stated: "I'm the -- currently I'm the head of
worldwide regulatory affairs for our prescription drug business, which means
I have responsibility in somewhere between 60 and 100 countries where we
sell products for registrations, compliance, things of that nature."
Excerpts from the trial transcript follow, with the Q indicating counsel's
Question, and the A indicating Dr. Posner's Answer:
Q. So there are some concerns addressed here back in 1995 about testing up
to .8. And do you know what the nature of the concern was?
A. Yes. It was related to a side effect that occurred in the brain.
Q. Of what kind of animal?
A. It occurred in the brain of dogs.
Q. Okay. So there was a side effect that occurred in dogs, and then there
was a concern about whether you wanted to go forward and test at this higher
dose level in human beings, given what you had learned about the dogs,
right?
A. That's correct.
Q. Okay. Now, did you just say, well, let's forget about these concerns and
we'll go ahead and put .8 on the market anyway, or did you do some further
analysis that was not mentioned the other day?
A. Yes. The authors of this had -- they had two concerns. One concern was
the toxicity that they found in the brain of dogs. But the other was that
they had no way to identify this and who might be at risk before it
happened. So there was no way to detect that someone was at risk for this
side effect.
[skip some testimony on other topics]
Q. Do you remember in one kind of animal there had been some studies done
that there could be a particular kind of problem with one kind of animal?
A. Oh, yeah. Yes, from the -- that's correct, from the toxicology studies.
Q. Okay. And were you able to demonstrate to your own satisfaction, to
SmithKline's satisfaction, to the FDA's satisfaction, that that particular
problem that showed up with that kind of animal is not something that
happens in human beings?
A. Yes. We did it -- we did it by explaining the toxicology data. We also
explained it on the basis of kinetic data. That actually at the higher
levels of drug, what happens is a certain amount of drug is bound to
proteins in the body that circulate; and therefore, is not -- cannot cause
side effects. And actually, a much smaller proportion of the drug is free.
And that what you corrected for that, you actually found out that the
margins of safety were in fact greater than you would predict just from the
animal data.
Q. And as you move forward then and got approval and sold Baycol from 1997
through 2001, did that problem that had shown up with that one kind of
animal ever become a problem with human beings?
A. It was actually shown with other statins as well. It wasn't unique to
cerivastatin. It was a problem -- it was identified early on with lovastatin
and some of the others. In fact, for none of the statins did it ever predict
for any clinical problem or toxicity.
Q. So these animals would have that same problem regardless of which
statin -- or at least with other statins?
A. Certainly with lovastatin it was true.
Q. But when it came time to human beings, that just wasn't something that
happened to human beings?
A. And I think today no one pays much attention to it.

Statin Adverse Effects FAQ: MEMORY LOSS & STATINS, AMNESIA & STATINS

MEMORY LOSS & STATINS, AMNESIA & STATINS

References (updated as of  January 7, 2005):

Randomized trial of the effects of simvastatin on cognitive functioning in
hypercholesterolemic adults.Am J Med. 2004 Dec 1;117(11):823-9. Muldoon MF,
Ryan CM, Sereika SM, Flory JD, Manuck SB.Center for Clinical Pharmacology,
University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, USA. mfm10@pitt.edu"This study
provides partial support for minor decrements in cognitive functioning with
statins. Whether such effects have any long-term sequelae or occur with
other cholesterol-lowering interventions is not known." This is the second
of two studies by Muldoon, both showing measurable cognitive decline in
statin groups after only 6 months, using Neuropsychological (NP) testing.
Further, this study identifies the subset of NP tests that are "statin
sensitive" in detecting the cognitive deficits.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstra
ct&list_uids=15589485


Effects of lovastatin on cognitive function and psychological well-being.

Muldoon MF, Barger SD, Ryan CM, Flory JD, Lehoczky JP, Matthews KA, Manuck
SB.
After 6 months, 100% of the patients on placeboes showed a measurable
increase in cognitive function, while the statin patients showed a
measurable decrease in cognitive function in some areas.
Am J Med. 2000 May;108(7):538-46.
PMID: 10806282 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=1
0806282&dopt=Abstract


Cognitive impairment associated with atorvastatin and simvastatin.King DS,
Wilburn AJ, Wofford MR, Harrell TK, Lindley BJ, Jones DW.Department of
Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi
39216, USA. dking@pharmacy.umsmed.eduPharmacotherapy. 2003
Dec;23(12):1663-7. "we report two women who experienced significant
cognitive impairment temporally related to statin therapy. One woman took
atorvastatin, and the other first took atorvastatin, then was rechallenged
with simvastatin. Clinicians should be aware of cognitive impairment and
dementia as potential adverse effects associated with statin therapy."
PMID: 14695047
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstra
ct&list_uids=14695047


"DRUGS THAT MAKE YOU FORGET"
Australian Adverse Drug Reactions Bulletin (Australia's equivalent to the
FDA)
Volume 17, Number 3, August 1998, section 3, page 3
Simvastatn is listed under "DRUGS THAT MAKE YOU FORGET"
Recognizing the 14 reports of Amnesia under that drug, .8% of the total
adverse effects for that drug.
www.health.gov.au/tga/docs/pdf/aadrbltn/aadr9808.pdf

Statin-associated memory loss: analysis of 60 case reports and review of the
literature.
Wagstaff LR, Mitton MW, Arvik BM, Doraiswamy PM.
Drug Information Service, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North
Carolina 27710, USA.  Pharmacotherapy. 2003 Jul;23(7):871-80.

This study searched the MedWatch drug surveillance system of the Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) from November 1997-February 2002 for reports of
statin-associated memory loss. They also reviewed the published literature.
References from the study are good for follow-up research.

Abstract:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=1
2885101&dopt=Abstract


Full Study Text free on Medscape:

http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/458867

The Role of Lipid-Lowering Drugs in Cognitive Function: A Meta-Analysis of
Observational Studies

from Pharmacotherapy
Posted 06/30/2003

Mahyar Etminan, Pharm.D., Sudeep Gill, M.D., FRCPC, Ali Samii, M.D., FRCPC

Although this study does bring the cognitive issues to light, it is a very
poor study.  The authors left out the pivotal study by Dr. Muldoon, that
showed 100% of statin users had a  measurable loss of cognitive ability
after 6 months, while 100% of the placebo group improved their scores.

Abstract:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=1
2820814&dopt=Abstract


Full Study Text free on Medscape:

http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/456866

Simvastatin-Associated Memory Loss
Amanda Orsi, Pharm.D., Olga Sherman, Pharm.D., and Zegga Woldeselassie,
Pharm.D.,
Abstract: The statins are widely used to treat dyslipidemias. They are
generally associated with mild adverse effects, but rarely, more serious
reactions may occur. A 51-year-old man experienced delayed-onset,
progressive memory loss while receiving simvastatin for
hypercholesterolemia. His therapy was switched to pravastatin, and memory
loss resolved gradually over the next month, with no recurrence of the
adverse effect.
from Pharmacotherapy
Posted 06/01/2001
Page 1 of 3:
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/409738?WebLogicSession=PXke2H8h99pyNVSCajAh5
clptzOAHJSZuNBobSwWmi9veWjdJ2A3%7C-1468812056489609316/184161392/6/7001/7001/700
2/7002/7001/-1

full printable version: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/409738_print

ADR of the Month
September 2001 Vol. 6 No. 9
EDITORS
Michelle W. McCarthy, Pharm.D.
Anne E. Hendrick, Pharm.D.

University of Virginia Health System
Department of Pharmacy Services
Drug Information Center
PO Box 800674
Charlottesville, VA 22908-0674
http://hsc.virginia.edu/pharmacy-services/Newsletters/ADR%20of%20the%20Month/ADR
Month%209-01htm.html


Do HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors impair memory?
The Tablet, a general member benefit published by the British Columbia
Pharmacy Association, September 2001, Volume 10 no 8.
Excerpt:
Do HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors impair memory? After taking simvastatin for
a year, a 51-year-old patient developed short term memory loss, to the
extent of being unable to complete his sentences because he would forget
what he was going to say. The drug was discontinued, replaced by
pravastatin, and within one month his memory returned.14 In a separate case,
a 67-year-old woman developed impaired short-term memory, altered mood,
social impairment, cognitive impairment and dementia after one year of
atorvastatin therapy. When atorvastatin was discontinued, her memory, mood
and cognition improved completely.15 Memory impairment in a patient
receiving atorvastatin has been reported to the BC Regional ADR Centre.
REFERENCES:
14. Orsi A, Sherman O, Woldeselassie Z. Simvastatin-associated memory loss.
15. King DS, Jones DW, Wofford MR et al. First report of cognitive
impairment in an elderly patient: case report. Pharmacotherapy 2001 Mar; 21:
371.

http://www.bcpharmacy.ca/publications/thetablet/pdf_version/BCPhA_Tablet-Sep2001.pdf
See page 11 of 16:

AMNESIA & STATINS

Lipitor, Thief of Memory

Dr. Duane Graveline, retired family MD, USAF Flight Surgeon, researcher in
space medicine and US Astronaut, who suffered adverse effects from Lipitor.
The book is available through Amazon.com.  Dr. Graveline maintains several
websites and is working on a second book about statin drug side effects:
www.spacedoc.net (you can start here and read about his life and his books)
http://www.spacedoc.net/lipitor_thief_of_memory.html
http://www.spacedoc.net/lipitor.htm
http://www.spacedoc.net/statin_dialogues.htm

Australian Adverse Drug Reactions Bulletin (Australia's equivalent to the
FDA)
Volume 17, Number 3, August 1998, section 3, page 3
Simvastatn is listed under "DRUGS THAT MAKE YOU FORGET"
Recognizing the 14 reports of Amnesia under that drug, .8% of the total
adverse effects for that drug.
www.health.gov.au/tga/docs/pdf/aadrbltn/aadr9808.pdf

===========

Please see also:

Mechanistic and epidemiologic considerations in the evaluation of adverse
birth outcomes following gestational exposure to statins.Am J Med Genet.
2004 Dec 15;131A(3):287-98. Edison RJ, Muenke M.Medical Genetics Branch,
National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health,
Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda,Maryland 20892-3717, USA."The
cholesterol-lowering "statin" drugs are contraindicated in pregnancy, but
few data exist on their safety in human gestation. We reviewed case reports
for patterns suggesting drug-related effects on prenatal development and
considered a variety of mechanisms by which such effects, if confirmed,
might occur. This uncontrolled case series included all FDA reports of
statin exposures during gestation, as well as others from the literature and
from manufacturers. Exposures and outcomes were reviewed and were tabulated
by individual drug. Age-specific rates of exposure to each drug among women
of child-bearing age were estimated. Of 214 ascertained pregnancy exposures,
70 evaluable reports remained after excluding uninformative cases. Among 31
adverse outcomes were 22 cases with structural defects, 4 cases of
intrauterine growth restriction, and 5 cases of fetal demise. There were two
principal categories of recurrent structural defects: cerivastatin and
lovastatin were a_ssociated with four reports of severe midline CNS defects;
simvastatin, lovastatin, and atorvastatin were all a_ssociated with reports
of limb deficiencies, including two similar complex lower limb defects
reported following simvastatin exposure. There were also two cases of
VACTERL a_ssociation among the limb deficiency cases. All adverse outcomes
were reported following exposure to cerivastatin, simvastatin, lovastatin,
or atorvastatin, which are lipophilic and equilibrate between maternal and
embryonic compartments. None were reported following exposure to
pravastatin, which is minimally present in the embryo. Statins reaching the
embryo may down-regulate biosynthesis of cholesterol as well as many
important metabolic intermediates, and may have secondary effects on
sterol-dependent morphogens such as Sonic Hedgehog. The reported cases
display patterns consistent with dysfunction of cholesterol biosynthesis and
Sonic Hedgehog activity. Controlled studies are needed to investigate the
teratogenicity of individual drugs in this cla_ss."PMID: 15546153 [PubMed -
in process]

Statins and risk of polyneuropathy, A case-control study
D. Gaist, MD, PhD; U. Jeppesen, MD, PhD; M. Andersen, MD, PhD; L.A. García
Rodríguez, MD, MSc;
J. Hallas, MD, PhD; and S.H. Sindrup, MD, PhD
http://213.4.18.135/87.pdf full text

Preclinical safety evaluation of cerivastatin, a novel HMG-CoA reductase
inhibitor.
von Keutz E, Schluter G.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9
737641&dopt=Abstract

Institute of Toxicology, PH-Product Development, Bayer AG, Wuppertal,
Germany
Am J Cardiol. 1998 Aug 27;82(4B):11J-17J.
PMID: 9737641
"In dogs, the species most sensitive to statins, cerivastatin caused
erosions and hemorrhages in the gastrointestinal tract, bleeding in the
brain stem with fibroid degeneration of vessel walls in the choroid plexus,
and lens opacity."

Subchronic toxicity of atorvastatin, a hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A
reductase inhibitor, in beagle dogs.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8
864188&dopt=Abstract

Walsh KM, Albassam MA, Clarke DE.
Parke-Davis Pharmaceutical Research, Division of Warner-Lambert Company, Ann
Arbor, Michigan 48105, USA.
"The toxicity of atorvastatin (AT), an inhibitor of
hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMG), was evaluated in beagle
dogs. hemorrhage in gallbladder and brain, demyelination of optic nerve, and
skeletal muscle necrosis"

Finally, on memory loss and statins: Sworn testimony from the Baycol trial
in Corpus Christi, Texas. From the transcript of the AM Session on 03-05-03,
in the case Hollis Haltom Vs. Bayer Corporation. Testifying under oath,., in
response to the plaintiff's attorney's question, "What is your current
position at Bayer?", LAWRENCE POSNER, M.D of BAYER stated: "I'm the --  
currently I'm the head of worldwide regulatory affairs for our prescription
drug business, which means I have responsibility in somewhere between 60 and
100 countries where we sell products for registrations, compliance, things
of that nature." Excerpts from the trial transcript follow, with the Q
indicating counsel's Question, and the A indicating Dr. Posner's Answer:
Q. So there are some concerns addressed here back in 1995 about testing up
to .8. And do you know what the nature of the concern was?
A. Yes. It was related to a side effect that occurred in the brain.
Q. Of what kind of animal?
A. It occurred in the brain of dogs.
Q. Okay. So there was a side effect that occurred in dogs, and then there
was a concern about whether you wanted to go forward and test at this higher
dose level in human beings, given what you had learned about the dogs,
right?
A. That's correct.
Q. Okay. Now, did you just say, well, let's forget about these concerns and
we'll go ahead and put .8 on the market anyway, or did you do some further
analysis that was not mentioned the other day?
A. Yes. The authors of this had -- they had two concerns. One concern was
the toxicity that they found in the brain of dogs. But the other was that
they had no way to identify this and who might be at risk before it
happened. So there was no way to detect that someone was at risk for this
side effect.
[skip some testimony on other topics]
Q. Do you remember in one kind of animal there had been some studies done
that there could be a particular kind of problem with one kind of animal?
A. Oh, yeah. Yes, from the -- that's correct, from the toxicology studies.
Q. Okay. And were you able to demonstrate to your own satisfaction, to
SmithKline's satisfaction, to the FDA's satisfaction, that that particular
problem that showed up with that kind of animal is not something that
happens in human beings?
A. Yes. We did it -- we did it by explaining the toxicology data. We also
explained it on the basis of kinetic data. That actually at the higher
levels of drug, what happens is a certain amount of drug is bound to
proteins in the body that circulate; and therefore, is not -- cannot cause
side effects. And actually, a much smaller proportion of the drug is free.
And that what you corrected for that, you actually found out that the
margins of safety were in fact greater than you would predict just from the
animal data.
Q. And as you move forward then and got approval and sold Baycol from 1997
through 2001, did that problem that had shown up with that one kind of
animal ever become a problem with human beings?
A. It was actually shown with other statins as well. It wasn't unique to
cerivastatin. It was a problem -- it was identified early on with lovastatin
and some of the others. In fact, for none of the statins did it ever predict
for any clinical problem or toxicity.
Q. So these animals would have that same problem regardless of which
statin -- or at least with other statins?
A. Certainly with lovastatin it was true.
Q. But when it came time to human beings, that just wasn't something that
happened to human beings?
A. And I think today no one pays much attention to it.

> Menge T, Hartung HP, Stuve O.
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> disease and ischaemic stroke. At present, however, results from ongoing
> prospective, randomized clinical trials are not available.
outrider@despammed.com - 23 Apr 2005 05:15 GMT
> Menge T, Hartung HP, Stuve O.
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> disease and ischaemic stroke. At present, however, results from ongoing
> prospective, randomized clinical trials are not available.

I have suffered serious damage from statins. They have virtually ended
a career requiring extraordinary complex language use and
multi-tasking. They have also caused me serious permanent vision
damage, myopathy, myosisits, rhabdomyolysis, joint pain, tendon and
ligament pain and damage, skin lesions, severe and dangerous memory
loss, and the loss of a life time of savings in order to live because I
have lost the skills one needs to work as a reporter, journalist,
writer and editor.

Warning: statins can and do cause serious sometimes permanent damage.

If you possibly can, do not take these drugs. Lowering cholesterol, if
one feels this is absolutely necessary, can be achieved to reasonable
levels by diet and exercise.

Zee

no cardiovascular disease, total cholesterol 9.7
Dennis P. Harris - 23 Apr 2005 07:51 GMT
> I have suffered serious damage from statins.

yada, yada, yada, and OFF TOPIC for this group.  this is NOT
alt.support.statins.
Karen - 23 Apr 2005 15:22 GMT
But this is in answer to a discussion of whether or not statins can produce
Alzheimer's like symptoms.  Follow the bouncing ball, please.  :-)

Karen

> > I have suffered serious damage from statins.
>
> yada, yada, yada, and OFF TOPIC for this group.  this is NOT
> alt.support.statins.
outrider@despammed.com - 23 Apr 2005 15:41 GMT
> But this is in answer to a discussion of whether or not statins can produce
> Alzheimer's like symptoms.  Follow the bouncing ball, please.  :-)

Hello Karen

Statins can cause cognitive adverse effects which are often
misdiagnosed as Alzheimer's Disease.

There is a difference: in most cases *dementia* from statins will
improve upon stopping the drug. One will recover although it may take
some time. Sadly, this is not the case with Alzheimer's.

My heartfelt sympathies to those diagnosed with Alzheimer's and their
loved ones.

Here is an article about the effects of statins on the elderly. I have
snipped a part of the article dealing with muscle weakness, atrophy,
pain and aching. It is recoverable upon clicking on the link. Zee

http://www.geriatrictimes.com/g040618.html

   © 2005 Geriatric Times. All rights reserved.

   Statin Adverse Effects: Implications for the Elderly
   by Beatrice A. Golomb, M.D., Ph.D.

   Geriatric Times         May/June 2004         Vol. V         Issue 3

-----------snip-------------

Cognitive Loss

   Cognitive problems also occur with statins and may also have more
impact in elderly patients. Two randomized trials that were designed to
assess cognitive effects of statins have shown worsening in cognitive
function (Muldoon et al., 2002, 2000). In addition, several case
reports (King et al., 2003, 2001; Orsi et al., 2001) and one large case
series (involving 60 patients) (Wagstaff et al., 2003) have reported
deleterious cognitive effects of statins on memory and cognitive
function.

   Although not expressly designed to assess cognition, results from
the Heart Protection Study (HPS) (Heart Protection Study Collaborative
Group, 2002) and PROSPER trial (Shepherd et al., 2002) did not show
that statin therapy had favorable or deleterious effects on cognitive
measures that were tested. Several factors may help to explain the
discrepancy between findings from these large and smaller trials
targeted at testing cognition. First, different measures of cognition
were used that may not have tapped the areas in which problems occur.
The telephone survey measure in the HPS, for instance, would not have
captured visuomotor coordination and processing speed, which the other
trials suggested may be particularly affected.

   Second, the large trials enrolled people at high risk for
cardiovascular disease who experience benefit from statins to nonfatal
stroke, which may lead to improvements in cognition that may help to
balance out harms to cognition from other mechanisms. Although there
are trends toward increases in fatal stroke with statins in most of the
large statin trials, those who have died cannot complete cognitive
surveys. The impact on total number of strokes was unaffected in the
PROSPER trial with its sole focus on the elderly population. In the
PROSPER trial, the number of reduced transient ischemic attacks and
nonfatal strokes was actually matched by a similar number of increased
fatal strokes.

   Finally, the HPS used what is termed an "active run-in." For six
weeks, participants considered for enrollment were placed on
simvastatin, and those who were not fully compliant were dropped from
the study. Participants who perceived problems on the drug, including
cognitive problems, may have dropped the study themselves or skipped
pills intentionally. In addition, participants who developed memory
problems may have had trouble remembering to take the pills even if
they did not recognize deterioration in cognitive function. This run-in
process may have excluded participants who developed cognitive problems
on the drug, selecting only those who did not experience problems. Over
one-third of those who were interested in enrolling were excluded
following this compliance run-in.

   Because statins reduce nonfatal stroke (and cognition is obviously
not measured in people who have experienced fatal stroke), benefits by
statins for cognitive function in those in whom a stroke was averted
might be expected. It must be emphasized that the randomized trial
evidence has, to date, uniformly failed to show cognitive benefits by
statins and has supported no effect or frank and significant harm to
cognitive function.

   Analogous to the case for muscle adverse effects, the impact of
cognitive adverse effects from statins, when they occur, may be more
profound in the elderly. Elderly patients have more commonly already
experienced some decline in cognitive function, and more commonly are
in a vulnerable range in which additional impairment can have an impact
on independence and safety. Indeed, a number of studies show that even
modest reductions in cognition in the elderly are linked to increased
mortality, even when the reductions remain within the nondemented
range, and even when other health factors have been controlled for
(Bassuk et al., 2000; Frisoni et al., 1999; Korten et al., 1999; Smits
et al., 1999). In this context, adverse cognitive effects must be taken
seriously not only for their intrinsic impact on quality of life, but
for their potentially weighty implications for mortality.

   Other Adverse Effects

   A large variety of other adverse effects have been reported with
statins, including (but not limited to) gastrointestinal and
neurological effects, psychiatric problems, immune effects (e.g.,
lupus-like syndrome), erectile dysfunction and gynecomastia (breast
enlargement in men), rash and skin problems, and sleep problems.

   Of particular note for the elderly population, the PROSPER trial
found a significant 25% increase in incident cancer in participants
over age 70 randomized to statin therapy versus placebo (Shepherd et
al., 2002). Because statins have been reported to cause cancer in
animals, the significant increase in cancer cannot be dismissed as
necessarily a fluke. While a similar increase has not been seen in
studies of statins in younger participants, older people have poorer
stores of the cancer-protecting antioxidant nutrients that low-density
lipoprotein cholesterol helps to transport to tissue (so that the
increase in risk may occur selectively in elderly). Even if the
fractional change in risk were similar, the elderly have a higher risk
of cancer, increasing the number of cancer events that would manifest.

   Low cholesterol is also linked to infection, including development
of postoperative infection (Leardi et al., 2000) and predicts mortality
and adverse outcomes in hospitalized patients (Crook et al., 1999).
While some of this could be due to illness causing lower cholesterol,
it may also be that low cholesterol contributes to illness; indeed,
animal studies suggest lipoproteins may serve to protect against
bacterial endotoxin-induced death (Read et al., 1993).

   Statins may produce irritability or short temper in some people, a
problem that occurs with statin therapy and resolves with its
discontinuation (Golomb et al., 2004). For elderly patients who depend
on others for assistance, irritability and its impact on the
relationship with caregivers may have special implications.

   Heart failure may also occur in patients taking statin therapy. In
some people, the myopathic effects of statins may impair heart pumping
function (Silver et al., 2003). However, in patients with reduced
pumping function due to coronary artery blockages, statins may help
heart pumping by improving blood flow to the heart (Node et al., 2003).
It depends on the person whether benefit or harm dominates with statin
therapy.

   Discussion

   Observational studies show that as age increases within the elderly
age range, high cholesterol flattens then reverses as a risk factor for
mortality (Weverling-Rijnsburger et al., 1997). Although it remains to
be fully clarified whether these findings have relevance to
cholesterol-lowering treatment, the exclusive major randomized trial of
statins conducted in the elderly does nothing to dispel a possible
causal association, as it did not show benefit of statins to survival.
The impact was completely neutral on mortality despite selecting for an
elderly population at only moderately older age and selecting for
particularly high risk of heart disease--the elderly group in whom
greater benefits and lower risks would be expected (Shepherd et al.,
2002). There are reasons for concern that still older people--those
elderly not selecting for high cardiac risk and those who are frailer
than clinical trials generally select--might fare less well. Caution
should be exercised in provision of statins as with all treatments in
elderly patients. Any time a patient develops a new problem or
worsening of an existing problem, the medication list should be
reviewed and a possible contribution by medications should be
considered. This principle is by no means confined to statins. It is
particularly true in elderly patients who may be on many medications
with interacting effects, and in whom ability to withstand adverse drug
reactions may be attenuated.

   Acknowledgement

   Dr. Golomb would like to thank Tram Dang for research assistance
and Janis Ritchie, R.N., for administrative assistance.

   Dr. Golomb is on the faculty of the department of medicine and
family and preventive medicine at the University of California, San
Diego. Her research focuses on the risks and benefits of medical
interventions.

   References

   Bassuk SS, Wypij D, Berkman LF (2000), Cognitive impairment and
mortality in the community-dwelling elderly. Am J Epidemiol
151(7):676-688.

   Crook MA, Velauthar U, Moran L, Griffiths W (1999),
Hypocholesterolaemia in a hospital population. Ann Clin Biochem 36(pt
5):613-616.

   Frisoni GB, Fratiglioni L, Fastbom J et al. (1999), Mortality in
nondemented subjects with cognitive impairment: the influence of
health-related factors. Am J Epidemiol 150(10):1031-1044.

   Golomb BA, Kane T, Dimsdale JA (2004), Severe irritability
associated with statin cholesterol-lowering drugs. QJM 97(4):229-235.

   Golomb BA, Yang E, Denenberg J, Criqui M (2003), Statin-associated
adverse events. P95. Presented at the 43rd Annual Conference on
Cardiovascular Disease Epidemiology and Prevention. Miami; March 5-8.

   Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Pieper CF et al. (2000), Lower extremity
function and subsequent disability: consistency across studies,
predictive models, and value of gait speed alone compared with the
short physical performance battery. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci
55(4):M221-M231.

   Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Simonsick EM et al. (1995),
Lower-extremity function in persons over the age of 70 years as a
predictor of subsequent disability. N Engl J Med 332(9):556-561 [see
comment].

   Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L et al. (1994), A short
physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function:
association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality
and nursing home admission. J Gerontol 49(2):M85-M94.

   Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group (2002), MRC/BHF Heart
Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536
high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet
360(9326):7-22 [see comments].

   King DS, Jones DW, Wofford MR et al. (2001), Cognitive impairment
associated with atorvastatin. Presented at the American College of
Clinical Pharmacy Spring Practice and Research Forum. Salt Lake City;
April 22-25.

   King DS, Wilburn AJ, Wofford MR et al. (2003), Cognitive impairment
associated with atorvastatin and simvastatin. Pharmacotherapy
23(12):1663-1667.

   Korten AE, Jorm AF, Jiao Z et al. (1999), Health, cognitive, and
psychosocial factors as predictors of mortality in an elderly community
sample. J Epidemiol Community Health 53(2):83-88.

   Leardi S, Altilia F, Delmonaco S et al. (2000), [Blood levels of
cholesterol and postoperative septic complications.] Ann Ital Chir
71(2):233-237.

   McDermott MM, Greenland P, Ferrucci L et al. (2002), Lower
extremity performance is associated with daily life physical activity
in individuals with and without peripheral arterial disease. J Am
Geriatr Soc 50(2):247-255.

   Muldoon MF, Barger SD, Ryan CM et al. (2000), Effects of lovastatin
on cognitive function and psychological well-being. Am J Med
108(7):538-546.

   Muldoon MF, Ryan CM, Flory JD, Manuck SB (2002), Effects of
simvastatin on cognitive functioning. Presented at the American Heart
Association Scientific Sessions. Chicago; Nov. 17-20.

   Node K, Fujita M, Kitakaze M et al. (2003), Short-term statin
therapy improves cardiac function and symptoms in patients with
idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. [Published erratum Circulation
108(17):2170.] Circulation 108(7):839-843.

   Orsi A, Sherman O, Woldeselassie Z (2001), Simvastatin-associated
memory loss. Pharmacotherapy 21(6):767-769.

   Pasternak RC, Smith SC, Bairey-Merz CN et al. (2002), ACC/AHA/NHLBI
Clinical Advisory on the Use and Safety of Statins. Stroke
33(9):2337-2341 [see comment].

   Penninx BW, Ferrucci L, Leveille SG et al. (2000), Lower extremity
performance in nondisabled older persons as a predictor of subsequent
hospitalization. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 55(11):M691-M697.

   Phillips PS, Haas RH, Bannykh S et al. (2002), Statin-associated
myopathy with normal creatine kinase levels. Ann Intern Med
137(7):581-585 [see comments].

   Phillips CT, Gray NL, Puhek LM et al. (2004), Basal respiratory
exchange ratio is altered with statin use in normals. J Am Cardio
43(suppl A):233a.

   Read TE, Harris HW, Grunfeld C et al. (1993), The protective effect
of serum lipoproteins against bacterial lipopolysaccharide. Eur Heart J
14(suppl K):125-129.

   Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group (1994), Randomised
trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart
disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet
344(8934):1383-1389.

   Shepherd J, Blauw GJ, Murphy MB et al. (2002), Pravastatin in
elderly individuals at risk of vascular disease (PROSPER): a randomised
controlled trial. Lancet 360(9346):1623-1630 [see comments].

   Silver MA, Langsjoen PH, Szabo S et al. (2003), Statin
cardiomyopathy? A potential role for coenzyme Q10 therapy for
statin-induced changes in diastolic LV performance: description of a
clinical protocol. Biofactors 18(1-4):125-127.

   Smits CH, Deeg DJ, Kriegsman DM, Schmand B (1999), Cognitive
functioning and health as determinants of mortality in an older
population. Am J Epidemiol 150(9):978-986.

   Wagstaff LR, Mitton MW, Arvik BM, Doraiswamy PM (2003),
Statin-associated memory loss: analysis of 60 case reports and review
of the literature. Pharmacotherapy 23(7):871-880.

   Weverling-Rijnsburger AW, Blauw GJ, Lagaay AM et al. (1997), Total
cholesterol and risk of mortality in the oldest old. [Published erratum
Lancet 351(9095):70.] Lancet 350(9085):1119-1123 [see comment].

Zee
Karen - 23 Apr 2005 16:33 GMT
Karen wrote:
> But this is in answer to a discussion of whether or not statins can
produce
> Alzheimer's like symptoms.  Follow the bouncing ball, please.  :-)

Hello Karen

Statins can cause cognitive adverse effects which are often
misdiagnosed as Alzheimer's Disease.

There is a difference: in most cases *dementia* from statins will
improve upon stopping the drug. One will recover although it may take
some time. Sadly, this is not the case with Alzheimer's.

My heartfelt sympathies to those diagnosed with Alzheimer's and their
loved ones.

---snip---
Zee

One thing I've heard of Alzheimer's is that it produces a brain shrinkage
pattern that is discernable on an MRI.  Don't know if that's only the case
with Alzheimer's or if statins produce a similar effect.  I have known
people in their 40s adversely affected by statins.  When you're in your 40s
and start having severe memory and muscular problems, people notice.  When
you're in your 70s, people attribute it to old age.  Of course, that's a
similar problem to many of the other things that are misdiagnosed as
Alzheimer's.

My Mom (in her 70s) thought her lack of energy was just old age.  Since she
found out she's gluten intolerant and changed her diet, she isn't tired and
napping all the time.  But her doctor didn't diagnose her, her daughter did.
her doctor attributed her lack of energy to age + weight.

I'm not sure which is more dangerous -- treating a problem you don't have or
leaving the problem untreated.  When doctors can't spend more than 10
minutes with a patient, both occur much to frequently.

Karen
Barb Boland - 02 May 2005 00:18 GMT
To: Dr. Harman:

Is the treatment you are speaking about is 'Arricept' (spelling) ? If so, my
mother is on that, and to be quite truthful, it is not working very well.
She has become very obstinate, not to mention mean. I guess right now, mean
describes my mother. It is very difficult dealing with her tantrums.

Barb

> Menge T, Hartung HP, Stuve O.
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> disease and ischaemic stroke. At present, however, results from ongoing
> prospective, randomized clinical trials are not available.
Dennis P. Harris - 02 May 2005 00:38 GMT
> Is the treatment you are speaking about is 'Arricept' (spelling) ? If so, my
> mother is on that, and to be quite truthful, it is not working very well.
> She has become very obstinate, not to mention mean. I guess right now, mean
> describes my mother. It is very difficult dealing with her tantrums.

it's not the aricept that's causing the attitude, it's simply the
stage of the disease.  if she has tantrums, it's probably because
she's afraid of losing control.

you should talk to her doctor about medication to reduce the
tantrums and/or delusions.

and "dr. harman" is a troll, probably *not* a real doctor.
she/he likes to post all kinds of articles that supposedly show a
negative picture of doctors and pharmaceuticals.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.