Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Alzheimer's / May 2005
Statins - a cure-all for the brain?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Dr. Harman - 22 Apr 2005 21:49 GMT Menge T, Hartung HP, Stuve O.
Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, Box 0114, San Francisco, California 94143-0114, USA.
'Statins' are 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors - oral cholesterol-lowering drugs that are used to treat hypercholesterolaemia. It is widely accepted that statins have anti-inflammatory effects that are independent of their ability to lower cholesterol. Animal studies and observational clinical studies have indicated that statins might also be effective in treating certain neurological diseases - in particular, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer's disease and ischaemic stroke. At present, however, results from ongoing prospective, randomized clinical trials are not available.
Sharon Hope - 23 Apr 2005 02:32 GMT Exactly, beagle dogs are a good predictor of statin cognitive adverse effects.
From the Lipitor Prescribing Information:
http://www.lipitor.com/cwp/appmanager/lipitor/lipitorDesktop?_nfpb=true&_pageLab el=prescribingInformation
CNS Toxicity
Brain hemorrhage was seen in a female dog treated for 3 months at 120 mg/kg/day. Brain hemorrhage and optic nerve vacuolation were seen in another female dog that was sacrificed in moribund condition after 11 weeks of escalating doses up to 280 mg/kg/day. The 120 mg/kg dose resulted in a systemic exposure approximately 16 times the human plasma area-under-the-curve (AUC, 0-24 hours) based on the maximum human dose of 80 mg/day. A single tonic convulsion was seen in each of 2 male dogs (one treated at 10 mg/kg/day and one at 120 mg/kg/day) in a 2-year study. No CNS lesions have been observed in mice after chronic treatment for up to 2 years at doses up to 400 mg/kg/day or in rats at doses up to 100 mg/kg/day. These doses were 6 to 11 times (mouse) and 8 to 16 times (rat) the human AUC (0-24) based on the maximum recommended human dose of 80 mg/day.
CNS vascular lesions, characterized by perivascular hemorrhages, edema, and mononuclear cell infiltration of perivascular spaces, have been observed in dogs treated with other members of this class. A chemically similar drug in this class produced optic nerve degeneration (Wallerian degeneration of retinogeniculate fibers) in clinically normal dogs in a dose-dependent fashion at a dose that produced plasma drug levels about 30 times higher than the mean drug level in humans taking the highest recommended dose.
Sworn testimony from the Baycol trial in Corpus Christi, Texas.
From the trial transcript of the AM Session on 03-05-03, in the case Hollis Haltom Vs. Bayer Corporation. Testifying under oath,., in response to the plaintiff's attorney's question, "What is your current position at Bayer?", LAWRENCE POSNER, M.D of BAYER stated: "I'm the -- currently I'm the head of worldwide regulatory affairs for our prescription drug business, which means I have responsibility in somewhere between 60 and 100 countries where we sell products for registrations, compliance, things of that nature." Excerpts from the trial transcript follow, with the Q indicating counsel's Question, and the A indicating Dr. Posner's Answer: Q. So there are some concerns addressed here back in 1995 about testing up to .8. And do you know what the nature of the concern was? A. Yes. It was related to a side effect that occurred in the brain. Q. Of what kind of animal? A. It occurred in the brain of dogs. Q. Okay. So there was a side effect that occurred in dogs, and then there was a concern about whether you wanted to go forward and test at this higher dose level in human beings, given what you had learned about the dogs, right? A. That's correct. Q. Okay. Now, did you just say, well, let's forget about these concerns and we'll go ahead and put .8 on the market anyway, or did you do some further analysis that was not mentioned the other day? A. Yes. The authors of this had -- they had two concerns. One concern was the toxicity that they found in the brain of dogs. But the other was that they had no way to identify this and who might be at risk before it happened. So there was no way to detect that someone was at risk for this side effect. [skip some testimony on other topics] Q. Do you remember in one kind of animal there had been some studies done that there could be a particular kind of problem with one kind of animal? A. Oh, yeah. Yes, from the -- that's correct, from the toxicology studies. Q. Okay. And were you able to demonstrate to your own satisfaction, to SmithKline's satisfaction, to the FDA's satisfaction, that that particular problem that showed up with that kind of animal is not something that happens in human beings? A. Yes. We did it -- we did it by explaining the toxicology data. We also explained it on the basis of kinetic data. That actually at the higher levels of drug, what happens is a certain amount of drug is bound to proteins in the body that circulate; and therefore, is not -- cannot cause side effects. And actually, a much smaller proportion of the drug is free. And that what you corrected for that, you actually found out that the margins of safety were in fact greater than you would predict just from the animal data. Q. And as you move forward then and got approval and sold Baycol from 1997 through 2001, did that problem that had shown up with that one kind of animal ever become a problem with human beings? A. It was actually shown with other statins as well. It wasn't unique to cerivastatin. It was a problem -- it was identified early on with lovastatin and some of the others. In fact, for none of the statins did it ever predict for any clinical problem or toxicity. Q. So these animals would have that same problem regardless of which statin -- or at least with other statins? A. Certainly with lovastatin it was true. Q. But when it came time to human beings, that just wasn't something that happened to human beings? A. And I think today no one pays much attention to it.
Statin Adverse Effects FAQ: MEMORY LOSS & STATINS, AMNESIA & STATINS
MEMORY LOSS & STATINS, AMNESIA & STATINS
References (updated as of January 7, 2005):
Randomized trial of the effects of simvastatin on cognitive functioning in hypercholesterolemic adults.Am J Med. 2004 Dec 1;117(11):823-9. Muldoon MF, Ryan CM, Sereika SM, Flory JD, Manuck SB.Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, USA. mfm10@pitt.edu"This study provides partial support for minor decrements in cognitive functioning with statins. Whether such effects have any long-term sequelae or occur with other cholesterol-lowering interventions is not known." This is the second of two studies by Muldoon, both showing measurable cognitive decline in statin groups after only 6 months, using Neuropsychological (NP) testing. Further, this study identifies the subset of NP tests that are "statin sensitive" in detecting the cognitive deficits. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstra ct&list_uids=15589485
Effects of lovastatin on cognitive function and psychological well-being.
Muldoon MF, Barger SD, Ryan CM, Flory JD, Lehoczky JP, Matthews KA, Manuck SB. After 6 months, 100% of the patients on placeboes showed a measurable increase in cognitive function, while the statin patients showed a measurable decrease in cognitive function in some areas. Am J Med. 2000 May;108(7):538-46. PMID: 10806282 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=1 0806282&dopt=Abstract
Cognitive impairment associated with atorvastatin and simvastatin.King DS, Wilburn AJ, Wofford MR, Harrell TK, Lindley BJ, Jones DW.Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi 39216, USA. dking@pharmacy.umsmed.eduPharmacotherapy. 2003 Dec;23(12):1663-7. "we report two women who experienced significant cognitive impairment temporally related to statin therapy. One woman took atorvastatin, and the other first took atorvastatin, then was rechallenged with simvastatin. Clinicians should be aware of cognitive impairment and dementia as potential adverse effects associated with statin therapy." PMID: 14695047 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstra ct&list_uids=14695047
"DRUGS THAT MAKE YOU FORGET" Australian Adverse Drug Reactions Bulletin (Australia's equivalent to the FDA) Volume 17, Number 3, August 1998, section 3, page 3 Simvastatn is listed under "DRUGS THAT MAKE YOU FORGET" Recognizing the 14 reports of Amnesia under that drug, .8% of the total adverse effects for that drug. www.health.gov.au/tga/docs/pdf/aadrbltn/aadr9808.pdf
Statin-associated memory loss: analysis of 60 case reports and review of the literature. Wagstaff LR, Mitton MW, Arvik BM, Doraiswamy PM. Drug Information Service, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. Pharmacotherapy. 2003 Jul;23(7):871-80.
This study searched the MedWatch drug surveillance system of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from November 1997-February 2002 for reports of statin-associated memory loss. They also reviewed the published literature. References from the study are good for follow-up research.
Abstract: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=1 2885101&dopt=Abstract
Full Study Text free on Medscape:
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/458867
The Role of Lipid-Lowering Drugs in Cognitive Function: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
from Pharmacotherapy Posted 06/30/2003
Mahyar Etminan, Pharm.D., Sudeep Gill, M.D., FRCPC, Ali Samii, M.D., FRCPC
Although this study does bring the cognitive issues to light, it is a very poor study. The authors left out the pivotal study by Dr. Muldoon, that showed 100% of statin users had a measurable loss of cognitive ability after 6 months, while 100% of the placebo group improved their scores.
Abstract:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=1 2820814&dopt=Abstract
Full Study Text free on Medscape:
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/456866
Simvastatin-Associated Memory Loss Amanda Orsi, Pharm.D., Olga Sherman, Pharm.D., and Zegga Woldeselassie, Pharm.D., Abstract: The statins are widely used to treat dyslipidemias. They are generally associated with mild adverse effects, but rarely, more serious reactions may occur. A 51-year-old man experienced delayed-onset, progressive memory loss while receiving simvastatin for hypercholesterolemia. His therapy was switched to pravastatin, and memory loss resolved gradually over the next month, with no recurrence of the adverse effect. from Pharmacotherapy Posted 06/01/2001 Page 1 of 3: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/409738?WebLogicSession=PXke2H8h99pyNVSCajAh5 clptzOAHJSZuNBobSwWmi9veWjdJ2A3%7C-1468812056489609316/184161392/6/7001/7001/700 2/7002/7001/-1 full printable version: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/409738_print
ADR of the Month September 2001 Vol. 6 No. 9 EDITORS Michelle W. McCarthy, Pharm.D. Anne E. Hendrick, Pharm.D.
University of Virginia Health System Department of Pharmacy Services Drug Information Center PO Box 800674 Charlottesville, VA 22908-0674 http://hsc.virginia.edu/pharmacy-services/Newsletters/ADR%20of%20the%20Month/ADR Month%209-01htm.html
Do HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors impair memory? The Tablet, a general member benefit published by the British Columbia Pharmacy Association, September 2001, Volume 10 no 8. Excerpt: Do HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors impair memory? After taking simvastatin for a year, a 51-year-old patient developed short term memory loss, to the extent of being unable to complete his sentences because he would forget what he was going to say. The drug was discontinued, replaced by pravastatin, and within one month his memory returned.14 In a separate case, a 67-year-old woman developed impaired short-term memory, altered mood, social impairment, cognitive impairment and dementia after one year of atorvastatin therapy. When atorvastatin was discontinued, her memory, mood and cognition improved completely.15 Memory impairment in a patient receiving atorvastatin has been reported to the BC Regional ADR Centre. REFERENCES: 14. Orsi A, Sherman O, Woldeselassie Z. Simvastatin-associated memory loss. 15. King DS, Jones DW, Wofford MR et al. First report of cognitive impairment in an elderly patient: case report. Pharmacotherapy 2001 Mar; 21: 371.
http://www.bcpharmacy.ca/publications/thetablet/pdf_version/BCPhA_Tablet-Sep2001.pdf See page 11 of 16:
AMNESIA & STATINS
Lipitor, Thief of Memory
Dr. Duane Graveline, retired family MD, USAF Flight Surgeon, researcher in space medicine and US Astronaut, who suffered adverse effects from Lipitor. The book is available through Amazon.com. Dr. Graveline maintains several websites and is working on a second book about statin drug side effects: www.spacedoc.net (you can start here and read about his life and his books) http://www.spacedoc.net/lipitor_thief_of_memory.html http://www.spacedoc.net/lipitor.htm http://www.spacedoc.net/statin_dialogues.htm
Australian Adverse Drug Reactions Bulletin (Australia's equivalent to the FDA) Volume 17, Number 3, August 1998, section 3, page 3 Simvastatn is listed under "DRUGS THAT MAKE YOU FORGET" Recognizing the 14 reports of Amnesia under that drug, .8% of the total adverse effects for that drug. www.health.gov.au/tga/docs/pdf/aadrbltn/aadr9808.pdf
===========
Please see also:
Mechanistic and epidemiologic considerations in the evaluation of adverse birth outcomes following gestational exposure to statins.Am J Med Genet. 2004 Dec 15;131A(3):287-98. Edison RJ, Muenke M.Medical Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda,Maryland 20892-3717, USA."The cholesterol-lowering "statin" drugs are contraindicated in pregnancy, but few data exist on their safety in human gestation. We reviewed case reports for patterns suggesting drug-related effects on prenatal development and considered a variety of mechanisms by which such effects, if confirmed, might occur. This uncontrolled case series included all FDA reports of statin exposures during gestation, as well as others from the literature and from manufacturers. Exposures and outcomes were reviewed and were tabulated by individual drug. Age-specific rates of exposure to each drug among women of child-bearing age were estimated. Of 214 ascertained pregnancy exposures, 70 evaluable reports remained after excluding uninformative cases. Among 31 adverse outcomes were 22 cases with structural defects, 4 cases of intrauterine growth restriction, and 5 cases of fetal demise. There were two principal categories of recurrent structural defects: cerivastatin and lovastatin were a_ssociated with four reports of severe midline CNS defects; simvastatin, lovastatin, and atorvastatin were all a_ssociated with reports of limb deficiencies, including two similar complex lower limb defects reported following simvastatin exposure. There were also two cases of VACTERL a_ssociation among the limb deficiency cases. All adverse outcomes were reported following exposure to cerivastatin, simvastatin, lovastatin, or atorvastatin, which are lipophilic and equilibrate between maternal and embryonic compartments. None were reported following exposure to pravastatin, which is minimally present in the embryo. Statins reaching the embryo may down-regulate biosynthesis of cholesterol as well as many important metabolic intermediates, and may have secondary effects on sterol-dependent morphogens such as Sonic Hedgehog. The reported cases display patterns consistent with dysfunction of cholesterol biosynthesis and Sonic Hedgehog activity. Controlled studies are needed to investigate the teratogenicity of individual drugs in this cla_ss."PMID: 15546153 [PubMed - in process]
Statins and risk of polyneuropathy, A case-control study D. Gaist, MD, PhD; U. Jeppesen, MD, PhD; M. Andersen, MD, PhD; L.A. García Rodríguez, MD, MSc; J. Hallas, MD, PhD; and S.H. Sindrup, MD, PhD http://213.4.18.135/87.pdf full text
Preclinical safety evaluation of cerivastatin, a novel HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor. von Keutz E, Schluter G. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9 737641&dopt=Abstract Institute of Toxicology, PH-Product Development, Bayer AG, Wuppertal, Germany Am J Cardiol. 1998 Aug 27;82(4B):11J-17J. PMID: 9737641 "In dogs, the species most sensitive to statins, cerivastatin caused erosions and hemorrhages in the gastrointestinal tract, bleeding in the brain stem with fibroid degeneration of vessel walls in the choroid plexus, and lens opacity."
Subchronic toxicity of atorvastatin, a hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, in beagle dogs. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8 864188&dopt=Abstract Walsh KM, Albassam MA, Clarke DE. Parke-Davis Pharmaceutical Research, Division of Warner-Lambert Company, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105, USA. "The toxicity of atorvastatin (AT), an inhibitor of hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMG), was evaluated in beagle dogs. hemorrhage in gallbladder and brain, demyelination of optic nerve, and skeletal muscle necrosis"
Finally, on memory loss and statins: Sworn testimony from the Baycol trial in Corpus Christi, Texas. From the transcript of the AM Session on 03-05-03, in the case Hollis Haltom Vs. Bayer Corporation. Testifying under oath,., in response to the plaintiff's attorney's question, "What is your current position at Bayer?", LAWRENCE POSNER, M.D of BAYER stated: "I'm the -- currently I'm the head of worldwide regulatory affairs for our prescription drug business, which means I have responsibility in somewhere between 60 and 100 countries where we sell products for registrations, compliance, things of that nature." Excerpts from the trial transcript follow, with the Q indicating counsel's Question, and the A indicating Dr. Posner's Answer: Q. So there are some concerns addressed here back in 1995 about testing up to .8. And do you know what the nature of the concern was? A. Yes. It was related to a side effect that occurred in the brain. Q. Of what kind of animal? A. It occurred in the brain of dogs. Q. Okay. So there was a side effect that occurred in dogs, and then there was a concern about whether you wanted to go forward and test at this higher dose level in human beings, given what you had learned about the dogs, right? A. That's correct. Q. Okay. Now, did you just say, well, let's forget about these concerns and we'll go ahead and put .8 on the market anyway, or did you do some further analysis that was not mentioned the other day? A. Yes. The authors of this had -- they had two concerns. One concern was the toxicity that they found in the brain of dogs. But the other was that they had no way to identify this and who might be at risk before it happened. So there was no way to detect that someone was at risk for this side effect. [skip some testimony on other topics] Q. Do you remember in one kind of animal there had been some studies done that there could be a particular kind of problem with one kind of animal? A. Oh, yeah. Yes, from the -- that's correct, from the toxicology studies. Q. Okay. And were you able to demonstrate to your own satisfaction, to SmithKline's satisfaction, to the FDA's satisfaction, that that particular problem that showed up with that kind of animal is not something that happens in human beings? A. Yes. We did it -- we did it by explaining the toxicology data. We also explained it on the basis of kinetic data. That actually at the higher levels of drug, what happens is a certain amount of drug is bound to proteins in the body that circulate; and therefore, is not -- cannot cause side effects. And actually, a much smaller proportion of the drug is free. And that what you corrected for that, you actually found out that the margins of safety were in fact greater than you would predict just from the animal data. Q. And as you move forward then and got approval and sold Baycol from 1997 through 2001, did that problem that had shown up with that one kind of animal ever become a problem with human beings? A. It was actually shown with other statins as well. It wasn't unique to cerivastatin. It was a problem -- it was identified early on with lovastatin and some of the others. In fact, for none of the statins did it ever predict for any clinical problem or toxicity. Q. So these animals would have that same problem regardless of which statin -- or at least with other statins? A. Certainly with lovastatin it was true. Q. But when it came time to human beings, that just wasn't something that happened to human beings? A. And I think today no one pays much attention to it.
> Menge T, Hartung HP, Stuve O. > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > disease and ischaemic stroke. At present, however, results from ongoing > prospective, randomized clinical trials are not available. outrider@despammed.com - 23 Apr 2005 05:15 GMT > Menge T, Hartung HP, Stuve O. > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > disease and ischaemic stroke. At present, however, results from ongoing > prospective, randomized clinical trials are not available. I have suffered serious damage from statins. They have virtually ended a career requiring extraordinary complex language use and multi-tasking. They have also caused me serious permanent vision damage, myopathy, myosisits, rhabdomyolysis, joint pain, tendon and ligament pain and damage, skin lesions, severe and dangerous memory loss, and the loss of a life time of savings in order to live because I have lost the skills one needs to work as a reporter, journalist, writer and editor.
Warning: statins can and do cause serious sometimes permanent damage.
If you possibly can, do not take these drugs. Lowering cholesterol, if one feels this is absolutely necessary, can be achieved to reasonable levels by diet and exercise.
Zee
no cardiovascular disease, total cholesterol 9.7
Dennis P. Harris - 23 Apr 2005 07:51 GMT > I have suffered serious damage from statins. yada, yada, yada, and OFF TOPIC for this group. this is NOT alt.support.statins.
Karen - 23 Apr 2005 15:22 GMT But this is in answer to a discussion of whether or not statins can produce Alzheimer's like symptoms. Follow the bouncing ball, please. :-)
Karen
> > I have suffered serious damage from statins. > > yada, yada, yada, and OFF TOPIC for this group. this is NOT > alt.support.statins. outrider@despammed.com - 23 Apr 2005 15:41 GMT > But this is in answer to a discussion of whether or not statins can produce > Alzheimer's like symptoms. Follow the bouncing ball, please. :-) Hello Karen
Statins can cause cognitive adverse effects which are often misdiagnosed as Alzheimer's Disease.
There is a difference: in most cases *dementia* from statins will improve upon stopping the drug. One will recover although it may take some time. Sadly, this is not the case with Alzheimer's.
My heartfelt sympathies to those diagnosed with Alzheimer's and their loved ones.
Here is an article about the effects of statins on the elderly. I have snipped a part of the article dealing with muscle weakness, atrophy, pain and aching. It is recoverable upon clicking on the link. Zee
http://www.geriatrictimes.com/g040618.html
© 2005 Geriatric Times. All rights reserved.
Statin Adverse Effects: Implications for the Elderly by Beatrice A. Golomb, M.D., Ph.D.
Geriatric Times May/June 2004 Vol. V Issue 3
-----------snip-------------
Cognitive Loss
Cognitive problems also occur with statins and may also have more impact in elderly patients. Two randomized trials that were designed to assess cognitive effects of statins have shown worsening in cognitive function (Muldoon et al., 2002, 2000). In addition, several case reports (King et al., 2003, 2001; Orsi et al., 2001) and one large case series (involving 60 patients) (Wagstaff et al., 2003) have reported deleterious cognitive effects of statins on memory and cognitive function.
Although not expressly designed to assess cognition, results from the Heart Protection Study (HPS) (Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group, 2002) and PROSPER trial (Shepherd et al., 2002) did not show that statin therapy had favorable or deleterious effects on cognitive measures that were tested. Several factors may help to explain the discrepancy between findings from these large and smaller trials targeted at testing cognition. First, different measures of cognition were used that may not have tapped the areas in which problems occur. The telephone survey measure in the HPS, for instance, would not have captured visuomotor coordination and processing speed, which the other trials suggested may be particularly affected.
Second, the large trials enrolled people at high risk for cardiovascular disease who experience benefit from statins to nonfatal stroke, which may lead to improvements in cognition that may help to balance out harms to cognition from other mechanisms. Although there are trends toward increases in fatal stroke with statins in most of the large statin trials, those who have died cannot complete cognitive surveys. The impact on total number of strokes was unaffected in the PROSPER trial with its sole focus on the elderly population. In the PROSPER trial, the number of reduced transient ischemic attacks and nonfatal strokes was actually matched by a similar number of increased fatal strokes.
Finally, the HPS used what is termed an "active run-in." For six weeks, participants considered for enrollment were placed on simvastatin, and those who were not fully compliant were dropped from the study. Participants who perceived problems on the drug, including cognitive problems, may have dropped the study themselves or skipped pills intentionally. In addition, participants who developed memory problems may have had trouble remembering to take the pills even if they did not recognize deterioration in cognitive function. This run-in process may have excluded participants who developed cognitive problems on the drug, selecting only those who did not experience problems. Over one-third of those who were interested in enrolling were excluded following this compliance run-in.
Because statins reduce nonfatal stroke (and cognition is obviously not measured in people who have experienced fatal stroke), benefits by statins for cognitive function in those in whom a stroke was averted might be expected. It must be emphasized that the randomized trial evidence has, to date, uniformly failed to show cognitive benefits by statins and has supported no effect or frank and significant harm to cognitive function.
Analogous to the case for muscle adverse effects, the impact of cognitive adverse effects from statins, when they occur, may be more profound in the elderly. Elderly patients have more commonly already experienced some decline in cognitive function, and more commonly are in a vulnerable range in which additional impairment can have an impact on independence and safety. Indeed, a number of studies show that even modest reductions in cognition in the elderly are linked to increased mortality, even when the reductions remain within the nondemented range, and even when other health factors have been controlled for (Bassuk et al., 2000; Frisoni et al., 1999; Korten et al., 1999; Smits et al., 1999). In this context, adverse cognitive effects must be taken seriously not only for their intrinsic impact on quality of life, but for their potentially weighty implications for mortality.
Other Adverse Effects
A large variety of other adverse effects have been reported with statins, including (but not limited to) gastrointestinal and neurological effects, psychiatric problems, immune effects (e.g., lupus-like syndrome), erectile dysfunction and gynecomastia (breast enlargement in men), rash and skin problems, and sleep problems.
Of particular note for the elderly population, the PROSPER trial found a significant 25% increase in incident cancer in participants over age 70 randomized to statin therapy versus placebo (Shepherd et al., 2002). Because statins have been reported to cause cancer in animals, the significant increase in cancer cannot be dismissed as necessarily a fluke. While a similar increase has not been seen in studies of statins in younger participants, older people have poorer stores of the cancer-protecting antioxidant nutrients that low-density lipoprotein cholesterol helps to transport to tissue (so that the increase in risk may occur selectively in elderly). Even if the fractional change in risk were similar, the elderly have a higher risk of cancer, increasing the number of cancer events that would manifest.
Low cholesterol is also linked to infection, including development of postoperative infection (Leardi et al., 2000) and predicts mortality and adverse outcomes in hospitalized patients (Crook et al., 1999). While some of this could be due to illness causing lower cholesterol, it may also be that low cholesterol contributes to illness; indeed, animal studies suggest lipoproteins may serve to protect against bacterial endotoxin-induced death (Read et al., 1993).
Statins may produce irritability or short temper in some people, a problem that occurs with statin therapy and resolves with its discontinuation (Golomb et al., 2004). For elderly patients who depend on others for assistance, irritability and its impact on the relationship with caregivers may have special implications.
Heart failure may also occur in patients taking statin therapy. In some people, the myopathic effects of statins may impair heart pumping function (Silver et al., 2003). However, in patients with reduced pumping function due to coronary artery blockages, statins may help heart pumping by improving blood flow to the heart (Node et al., 2003). It depends on the person whether benefit or harm dominates with statin therapy.
Discussion
Observational studies show that as age increases within the elderly age range, high cholesterol flattens then reverses as a risk factor for mortality (Weverling-Rijnsburger et al., 1997). Although it remains to be fully clarified whether these findings have relevance to cholesterol-lowering treatment, the exclusive major randomized trial of statins conducted in the elderly does nothing to dispel a possible causal association, as it did not show benefit of statins to survival. The impact was completely neutral on mortality despite selecting for an elderly population at only moderately older age and selecting for particularly high risk of heart disease--the elderly group in whom greater benefits and lower risks would be expected (Shepherd et al., 2002). There are reasons for concern that still older people--those elderly not selecting for high cardiac risk and those who are frailer than clinical trials generally select--might fare less well. Caution should be exercised in provision of statins as with all treatments in elderly patients. Any time a patient develops a new problem or worsening of an existing problem, the medication list should be reviewed and a possible contribution by medications should be considered. This principle is by no means confined to statins. It is particularly true in elderly patients who may be on many medications with interacting effects, and in whom ability to withstand adverse drug reactions may be attenuated.
Acknowledgement
Dr. Golomb would like to thank Tram Dang for research assistance and Janis Ritchie, R.N., for administrative assistance.
Dr. Golomb is on the faculty of the department of medicine and family and preventive medicine at the University of California, San Diego. Her research focuses on the risks and benefits of medical interventions.
References
Bassuk SS, Wypij D, Berkman LF (2000), Cognitive impairment and mortality in the community-dwelling elderly. Am J Epidemiol 151(7):676-688.
Crook MA, Velauthar U, Moran L, Griffiths W (1999), Hypocholesterolaemia in a hospital population. Ann Clin Biochem 36(pt 5):613-616.
Frisoni GB, Fratiglioni L, Fastbom J et al. (1999), Mortality in nondemented subjects with cognitive impairment: the influence of health-related factors. Am J Epidemiol 150(10):1031-1044.
Golomb BA, Kane T, Dimsdale JA (2004), Severe irritability associated with statin cholesterol-lowering drugs. QJM 97(4):229-235.
Golomb BA, Yang E, Denenberg J, Criqui M (2003), Statin-associated adverse events. P95. Presented at the 43rd Annual Conference on Cardiovascular Disease Epidemiology and Prevention. Miami; March 5-8.
Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Pieper CF et al. (2000), Lower extremity function and subsequent disability: consistency across studies, predictive models, and value of gait speed alone compared with the short physical performance battery. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 55(4):M221-M231.
Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Simonsick EM et al. (1995), Lower-extremity function in persons over the age of 70 years as a predictor of subsequent disability. N Engl J Med 332(9):556-561 [see comment].
Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L et al. (1994), A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol 49(2):M85-M94.
Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group (2002), MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 360(9326):7-22 [see comments].
King DS, Jones DW, Wofford MR et al. (2001), Cognitive impairment associated with atorvastatin. Presented at the American College of Clinical Pharmacy Spring Practice and Research Forum. Salt Lake City; April 22-25.
King DS, Wilburn AJ, Wofford MR et al. (2003), Cognitive impairment associated with atorvastatin and simvastatin. Pharmacotherapy 23(12):1663-1667.
Korten AE, Jorm AF, Jiao Z et al. (1999), Health, cognitive, and psychosocial factors as predictors of mortality in an elderly community sample. J Epidemiol Community Health 53(2):83-88.
Leardi S, Altilia F, Delmonaco S et al. (2000), [Blood levels of cholesterol and postoperative septic complications.] Ann Ital Chir 71(2):233-237.
McDermott MM, Greenland P, Ferrucci L et al. (2002), Lower extremity performance is associated with daily life physical activity in individuals with and without peripheral arterial disease. J Am Geriatr Soc 50(2):247-255.
Muldoon MF, Barger SD, Ryan CM et al. (2000), Effects of lovastatin on cognitive function and psychological well-being. Am J Med 108(7):538-546.
Muldoon MF, Ryan CM, Flory JD, Manuck SB (2002), Effects of simvastatin on cognitive functioning. Presented at the American Heart Association Scientific Sessions. Chicago; Nov. 17-20.
Node K, Fujita M, Kitakaze M et al. (2003), Short-term statin therapy improves cardiac function and symptoms in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. [Published erratum Circulation 108(17):2170.] Circulation 108(7):839-843.
Orsi A, Sherman O, Woldeselassie Z (2001), Simvastatin-associated memory loss. Pharmacotherapy 21(6):767-769.
Pasternak RC, Smith SC, Bairey-Merz CN et al. (2002), ACC/AHA/NHLBI Clinical Advisory on the Use and Safety of Statins. Stroke 33(9):2337-2341 [see comment].
Penninx BW, Ferrucci L, Leveille SG et al. (2000), Lower extremity performance in nondisabled older persons as a predictor of subsequent hospitalization. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 55(11):M691-M697.
Phillips PS, Haas RH, Bannykh S et al. (2002), Statin-associated myopathy with normal creatine kinase levels. Ann Intern Med 137(7):581-585 [see comments].
Phillips CT, Gray NL, Puhek LM et al. (2004), Basal respiratory exchange ratio is altered with statin use in normals. J Am Cardio 43(suppl A):233a.
Read TE, Harris HW, Grunfeld C et al. (1993), The protective effect of serum lipoproteins against bacterial lipopolysaccharide. Eur Heart J 14(suppl K):125-129.
Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group (1994), Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet 344(8934):1383-1389.
Shepherd J, Blauw GJ, Murphy MB et al. (2002), Pravastatin in elderly individuals at risk of vascular disease (PROSPER): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 360(9346):1623-1630 [see comments].
Silver MA, Langsjoen PH, Szabo S et al. (2003), Statin cardiomyopathy? A potential role for coenzyme Q10 therapy for statin-induced changes in diastolic LV performance: description of a clinical protocol. Biofactors 18(1-4):125-127.
Smits CH, Deeg DJ, Kriegsman DM, Schmand B (1999), Cognitive functioning and health as determinants of mortality in an older population. Am J Epidemiol 150(9):978-986.
Wagstaff LR, Mitton MW, Arvik BM, Doraiswamy PM (2003), Statin-associated memory loss: analysis of 60 case reports and review of the literature. Pharmacotherapy 23(7):871-880.
Weverling-Rijnsburger AW, Blauw GJ, Lagaay AM et al. (1997), Total cholesterol and risk of mortality in the oldest old. [Published erratum Lancet 351(9095):70.] Lancet 350(9085):1119-1123 [see comment].
Zee
Karen - 23 Apr 2005 16:33 GMT Karen wrote:
> But this is in answer to a discussion of whether or not statins can produce
> Alzheimer's like symptoms. Follow the bouncing ball, please. :-) Hello Karen
Statins can cause cognitive adverse effects which are often misdiagnosed as Alzheimer's Disease.
There is a difference: in most cases *dementia* from statins will improve upon stopping the drug. One will recover although it may take some time. Sadly, this is not the case with Alzheimer's.
My heartfelt sympathies to those diagnosed with Alzheimer's and their loved ones.
---snip--- Zee
One thing I've heard of Alzheimer's is that it produces a brain shrinkage pattern that is discernable on an MRI. Don't know if that's only the case with Alzheimer's or if statins produce a similar effect. I have known people in their 40s adversely affected by statins. When you're in your 40s and start having severe memory and muscular problems, people notice. When you're in your 70s, people attribute it to old age. Of course, that's a similar problem to many of the other things that are misdiagnosed as Alzheimer's.
My Mom (in her 70s) thought her lack of energy was just old age. Since she found out she's gluten intolerant and changed her diet, she isn't tired and napping all the time. But her doctor didn't diagnose her, her daughter did. her doctor attributed her lack of energy to age + weight.
I'm not sure which is more dangerous -- treating a problem you don't have or leaving the problem untreated. When doctors can't spend more than 10 minutes with a patient, both occur much to frequently.
Karen
Barb Boland - 02 May 2005 00:18 GMT To: Dr. Harman:
Is the treatment you are speaking about is 'Arricept' (spelling) ? If so, my mother is on that, and to be quite truthful, it is not working very well. She has become very obstinate, not to mention mean. I guess right now, mean describes my mother. It is very difficult dealing with her tantrums.
Barb
> Menge T, Hartung HP, Stuve O. > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > disease and ischaemic stroke. At present, however, results from ongoing > prospective, randomized clinical trials are not available. Dennis P. Harris - 02 May 2005 00:38 GMT > Is the treatment you are speaking about is 'Arricept' (spelling) ? If so, my > mother is on that, and to be quite truthful, it is not working very well. > She has become very obstinate, not to mention mean. I guess right now, mean > describes my mother. It is very difficult dealing with her tantrums. it's not the aricept that's causing the attitude, it's simply the stage of the disease. if she has tantrums, it's probably because she's afraid of losing control.
you should talk to her doctor about medication to reduce the tantrums and/or delusions.
and "dr. harman" is a troll, probably *not* a real doctor. she/he likes to post all kinds of articles that supposedly show a negative picture of doctors and pharmaceuticals.
|
|
|