Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Alzheimer's / September 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Wandering/elopement/exit-seeking bahvior

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jef. - 23 Sep 2004 06:23 GMT
Pop has AD, but is still mobile and semi-coherent, though easily confused.
It's early days, yet.
We've spent the last couple of months shepherding
him from the hospital to a nursing home to (after touring several different
facilities) this very nice group home where we finally managed to get him a
private room.

It seems he's getting very agitated and restless at night 7:00 to 9:00 PM
especially.(Sundowning?)
He's made several attempts to try and leave the premises, much to the
frustration of the single caregiver who is there in the evenings. (Not an
issue during the daytime, as there are 2 people on duty for the 8 residents
in the
place, so 1-to-1 attention is possible.)

He keeps trying to find his nonexistent car in order to go "home"-- which no
longer exists since we had to clear his apartment out and
dispose of his belongings, except for what would fit into his single room at
the group home. This process involved deciding what to keep, store, salvage,
donate or dispose of-- the criterion being "Will he ever *really* need this
item again?" and then saying "no" to things like books, a wallet, neckties,
credit cards, pots and pans, etc... It was scary and depressing as hell;
like I need to tell you folks about this...!

Anyway, they're talking about having to discharge him, as they refuse to
keep people who are at risk for "elopement" as they call it-- escape, in
other words. They told us up front that the only reasons they'd refuse to
continue to keep a resident there was if the person became abusive or
combative, or if they demonstrated "chronic exit-seeking behaviors".

The options are for them to hire another staff person (not realistic) or
to simply medicate the hell out of him, keep him so doped up or downed out
that it'd be rather impossible for him to go anywhere... and I'm loathe to
authorize that.

We are facing having to find some brand new, locked ward facility of some
sort, that isn't an absolute goddam snakepit-- something we encountered
many, many, MANY of while looking for the current facility where he is now.
We're completely over a barrel.

Anyone familiar with whatever medication(s) might be used to subdue
wanderers, and what side-effects-- or just plain effects-- there are?

Have you found anything else that works to dissuade/discourage/prevent
"elopement"?
This facility is a private home, and Fire laws preclude adding locks to the
rooms.

Sigh....

Thanks for any feedback--
Jef.
Dennis P. Harris - 23 Sep 2004 10:05 GMT
> The options are for them to hire another staff person (not realistic) or
> to simply medicate the hell out of him, keep him so doped up or downed out
> that it'd be rather impossible for him to go anywhere... and I'm loathe to
> authorize that.

not all anti-agitation meds will dope him up or down him out.
talk to a geriatric psychiatrist about which drugs might be able
to help.  a good psych doc should be able to recommend one of
several drugs that would work well for him.
Mary Gordon - 23 Sep 2004 15:25 GMT
I hate to tell you this, but the only way to prevent wandering when
you've got a mobile patient is with alarms and locks. You can reduce
agitation with some meds, but if he's a wanderer...! Its an extremely
common problem. You can't tie the guy in bed or in a chair. You can't
drug him into oblivion. If he's on his feet, the potential for him to
try and go out in his confused state is really high.

A fairly simple and effective solution is a wander guard - i.e. the
person wears a bracelet (they can't take it off) that sets off an
alarm if they pass through an entrance. Here is a sample of one of
these units - they make small ones for homes and fancier ones for
larger facilities. EVERY entry point must be alarmed.
http://www.seniortech.com/wanderguard/wanderguard.htm

However, for this to work, you need on the ball staff - it might be
okay in a group home, but not in a larger institution i.e. someone has
to respond to the alarm STAT before the person gets away onto the
street etc.

One of the best solutions is permanently locked doors with a keypad
entry so the person with dementia can't get out, but anyone with it
enough to remember a three or four digit entry code can get in and
out. Most locked AD wards have a similar system on all doors,
stairwell entries, elevators etc. and combine this with the
wanderguards.

You need the wanderguards as back up since people coming in and out
will often unknowingly let someone out (i.e. the wanderer seizes the
opportunity to escape when a visitor opens the door, not realizing
that the person is demented and must not be let out unescorted). This
happened at a large institution in Toronto a couple of years ago, and
the gentleman died of exposure. He had just moved to a locked ward,
and hadn't yet been fitted with a wanderguard - they did have him in a
special bright coloured t-shirt to identify him as an inmate of the
locked ward, but an unknowing visitor came in and let him out quite
innnocently. He got into a ravine and - !

You might also want to iron name tags into his clothing with contact
numbers, have him registered as a wanderer with the local police, and
get him to wear a medic alert bracelet with similar information.

Mary G.
Dennis P. Harris - 25 Sep 2004 04:14 GMT
> A fairly simple and effective solution is a wander guard - i.e. the
> person wears a bracelet (they can't take it off) that sets off an
> alarm if they pass through an entrance.

There are also systems that use similar bracelets or sensors
embedded in clothing that lock the door when a person with the
sensor on is nearby.  Most use keypads to override the door lock.
Gwen Love - 25 Sep 2004 08:54 GMT
The nursing home my husband was in used sensors on the wheelchairs that
locked the door when the chair came close.
Gwen

> > A fairly simple and effective solution is a wander guard - i.e. the
> > person wears a bracelet (they can't take it off) that sets off an
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> embedded in clothing that lock the door when a person with the
> sensor on is nearby.  Most use keypads to override the door lock.
Dennis White - 23 Sep 2004 19:14 GMT
   When I looked for a group home for Evan I came across an arrangement I
would very much like to see more of.  Evan was not a wanderer, but we did
come across a facility set on about half an acre that was entirely gated.
The setting was very park-like, and since no one was able to come and go
without passing through the main entrance the clients were in no danger of
"eloping".  I would hope there are facilities near to you or anyone else who
has an LO with the same desire to wander.  A gated home is the simplest,
most elegant solution.  I am highly opposed to medicating LO's simply for
the convenience of staff overseeing clients, when there are so many other
reasonable options.

Dennis

> Pop has AD, but is still mobile and semi-coherent, though easily confused.
> It's early days, yet.
[quoted text clipped - 48 lines]
> Thanks for any feedback--
> Jef.
Mary Gordon - 24 Sep 2004 14:09 GMT
I've often thought that a good design would be something built like a
donut around a central courtyard that residents could go into. The
other good thing about a ring design is that pacers can go around and
around, and there are no dead ends for them to get "stuck" in.

My MILs locked AD ward (full of quite advanced but still ambulatory
patients) had a ring on one side and a T shaped hall on the other,
although the center of the ring in her facility was occupied by
utility rooms (the bathrooms, nursing station, supply rooms etc.
rather than a nice courtyard or garden.

Some of the residents would get into the T section and really have
trouble getting out, and the ones with Parkinson's often got stuck
there (it was something about a dead end), but in the ring portion,
they would just shuffle happily around. The staff also used the ring
shape to get the residents a little exercise - a few times a day they
just got everyone up and herded them around the ring a few times.

They did have a fenced secure garden on the main floor off the dining
room, but the AD patients would not have been able to get into it
alone (i.e. they would have had to be escorted off the floor and let
into it).

Mary G.
Beth - 24 Sep 2004 15:46 GMT
My MIL is at a dementia-specific ALF of a corporation that designs
specifically for this kind of issue.  There is a circular hall with 4
"neighborhoods" (L-shaped) of 15 beds each off of it.  Mary, you're
right, the pacers go round and round and round.  There are patios at 9 &
3 o'clock but they're not really used, just let in natural light and
allow you to see the outside weather.  Janitorial, staff lounge, nursing
office, salon, restrooms are within that circle.  Each neighborhood has
a kitchen, dining area, laundry, living room, plus 2 complete bathrooms.
 Each resident has a room with a half-bath and there is a suite for 2
at the end of each neighborhood (they regularly have couples).  Outside
is a gated, paved U-shaped path around the building(200')-with covered
patios outside of each neighborhood and a large one out behind the
community center where they have the BBQs.

There is 1 exit you punch a keyboard to get out to the main office area
and parking lot.  Positives, all ground level and once you're in, you're
in.  Residents have to really hunt to be able to see the parking lot
(it's visible from some of the room windows), so they do not see
traffic; just trees and a wetleand with 1 neighbor who rides a mower,
keeps up birdfeeders, and so on.  You can walk the circle, step into
each neighborhood and see the kitchen and whether the nurse is handing
out meds there.  For the ones going home, they walk and walk- and
they're still looking to "catch the bus" but they tire doing it.  It can
be confusing to find your own neighborhood, but there's often someone in
the circle who can direct.  We enjoy just sitting and watching the
comings and goings inside, or the trees and birds outside.

Plus the staff are pretty good and attentive.  It's worth the cost.
E-mail me and I can give more specifics.

Beth in Maryland
Dennis White - 24 Sep 2004 16:30 GMT
> My MIL is at a dementia-specific ALF of a corporation that designs
> specifically for this kind of issue.

snip...

    Both you and Mary bring up good and bad points to how a facility is
thought out.  I think that if families and clients start demanding better
facilities eventually ALF,s AFH's, etc.. will have to respond to our needs.
As I said before, I am vehemently opposed top medicating our loved ones
simply to make it easier for staff...and that goes for making up for poor
design /use of a facility.  Especially given the costs we and the State must
pay  for them.  The people who run these places would never move into a home
that was so lacking in design and/or amenities that it would necessitate
*them* taking drugs!  Why put our LO's through that!!!
    By the way, just so no one gets me wrong on this point:  I have no
objection to medicating those who truly need the calming or stabilizing
effects of drugs.

Dennis White
Camille - 24 Sep 2004 17:12 GMT
Beth,

This is exactly the layout of the facility that my mother lives in.  The
only difference is there are 13 beds on each neighborhood.  She is in
Houston.  The arrangement works extremely well.  She calls the community
center the town hall.

Camille

> My MIL is at a dementia-specific ALF of a corporation that designs
> specifically for this kind of issue.  There is a circular hall with 4
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> Beth in Maryland
Dennis P. Harris - 25 Sep 2004 04:15 GMT
> I am highly opposed to medicating LO's simply for
> the convenience of staff overseeing clients, when there are so many other
> reasonable options.

There is a difference between convenience and reducing agitation.
If the patient is agitated, there are drugs that will reduce the
agitation without putting them to sleep.
Dennis White - 25 Sep 2004 08:20 GMT
> > I am highly opposed to medicating LO's simply for
> > the convenience of staff overseeing clients, when there are so many other
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> If the patient is agitated, there are drugs that will reduce the
> agitation without putting them to sleep.

Perhaps your mail reader did not include the second paragraph of the post
you refer to above.  It reads:

   "By the way, just so no one gets me wrong on this point:  I have no
objection to medicating those who truly need the calming or stabilizing
effects of drugs".

Dennis White
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.