Medical Forum / General / Alternative / January 2005
Chicken pox vaccine: Unhealthy, unnecessary, useless
|
|
Thread rating:  |
john - 05 Jan 2005 10:29 GMT Chicken pox vaccine: Unhealthy, unnecessary, useless
For Immediate release - 5/1/05
Prof. Peter McIntyre has admitted that prior to Chicken Pox vaccination in Australia, 90-95% of all children developed this illness and were therefore immune. The experience from overseas where the vaccine has been used however, has shown that vaccine-based immunity, only short-lived at best, leaves vaccinated adults susceptible to infection with Chicken Pox at a time when this normally benign disease of childhood can have serious ramifications.
The federal government is considering subsidising the Chicken pox (Varicella) vaccine for all Australian toddlers and 10 year olds. "I am very hopeful that Minister Abbott will consider the following information in making his decision on this most important issue," said Meryl Dorey, National President of the Australian Vaccination Network, a health lobby group:
1- Chicken pox is a benign disease of childhood. The only people who are at risk of complications from this illness are those with serious immune suppression. Almost all of those who have died from chicken pox had been treated prior to their deaths with steroids, anti-virals or other immune-suppressive drugs.
2- The experience in Japan, the country which has used this vaccine for the longest time, has been that rather than preventing Chicken pox, vaccination has simply moved the disease from children into adults - a time when this normally benign disease can be more dangerous.
3- The Chicken pox vaccine is one of 3 childhood vaccines (including injected polio [IPV] and rubella) which are cultured on the cell lines of aborted human foetuses. During its production process, this vaccine is actually passed through 3 different human foetal cell lines and one cell line of an embryonic guinea pig.
4- Use of this vaccine has led to an increase in Herpes zoster (shingles) infections in children. This painful illness used to be unheard of in young people but is now becoming more and more common in countries where this vaccine is used.
5- This vaccine contains Neomycin produced by Merck Sharpe and Dohme. According to the manufacturer (http://www.merck.com/mrkshared/mmanual/section13/chapter153/153c.jsp), Neomycin should only be used topically or orally - never injected because of the high toxicity of this drug when injected.
There are too many questions and not enough answers about this vaccine. In addition, there does not appear to be a need to vaccinate against Chicken pox - prevention of such a mild disease with a vaccine which is unproven and contains such toxic ingredients is taking too great a risk for the supposed benefits we would gain.
For further information or to arrange an interview, please contact Meryl Dorey on:
Ph - 02 6687 1699
FAX - 02 6687 2032
Mobile - 0414 872 032
E-Mail - meryl@avn.org.au
John Que - 05 Jan 2005 10:56 GMT One word:. Shingles Two words: birth defects Three words: John is wrong
john - 06 Jan 2005 10:53 GMT > One word:. Shingles > Two words: birth defects > Three words: John is wrong http://www.whale.to/a/chickenpox.html
Harpoon - 06 Jan 2005 20:16 GMT >> One word:. Shingles >> Two words: birth defects >> Three words: John is wrong > > http://www.whale.to/a/chickenpox.html Here is the keynote quotation from john's link. "[They want to vaccinate every child with an unsafe and ineffective vaccine on the chance they will end up on immune destroying drugs for diseases such as asthma that they caused in the first place with other vaccines and drugs, while they turn a blind eye to life saving cures such as vitamin C. Think about that for awhile.]"
Thinking, thinking, thinking, thinking, thinking, thinking, thinking, thinking, thinking, thinking, thinking, ...the quote still looks stupid, how long should I keep thinking?
Who is they?
Since when is vitamin C a life saving cure?
Be sure to give long answers as we promise we will not use that information for mind control analysis and planning.
 Signature NWO UNIX Beast Computer XIII User ID 666110212090438206
Vaccine-man - 05 Jan 2005 14:10 GMT Once again, john doesn't let facts interfere with his positions.
> Chicken pox vaccine: Unhealthy, unnecessary, useless > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > treated prior to their deaths with steroids, anti-virals or other > immune-suppressive drugs. My spouse, who is completely healthy, had chickenpox as a toddler and had to be hospitalized. She nearly lost the vision in one eye because of it. It is not a benign infection for thousands of children (pre-vaccine era).
> 2- The experience in Japan, the country which has used this vaccine for the > longest time, has been that rather than preventing Chicken pox, vaccination > has simply moved the disease from children into adults - a time when this > normally benign disease can be more dangerous. They needed to increase coverage of children and use boosters (which they have already implemented).
> 3- The Chicken pox vaccine is one of 3 childhood vaccines (including > injected polio [IPV] and rubella) which are cultured on the cell lines of > aborted human foetuses. During its production process, this vaccine is > actually passed through 3 different human foetal cell lines and one cell > line of an embryonic guinea pig. We cannot pick and choose which cell lines that viruses grow in. These viruses only grow in these cells. Whether you like it or not is irrelevant. For vaccines, cell lines used for propogation cannot be transformed lines (e.g. HEp2, VERO, etc.) because of the risk of human transformation in recipients. Only primary cultures can be used.
> 4- Use of this vaccine has led to an increase in Herpes zoster (shingles) > infections in children. This painful illness used to be unheard of in young > people but is now becoming more and more common in countries where this > vaccine is used. I'd like to see your reference on this, please. From what I've read, shingles in children after vaccination is extrememly rare and not as serious as in adults.
> 5- This vaccine contains Neomycin produced by Merck Sharpe and Dohme. > According to the manufacturer (http://www.merck.com/mrkshared/mmanual/section13/chapter153/153c.jsp),
> Neomycin should only be used topically or orally - never injected because of > the high toxicity of this drug when injected. Chose to ignore DOSE again, eh john? Toxicity is a function of dose - we've been over this time and time again. The amount of neomycin in these live vaccines is tiny and has no detectable toxicity after injection. It's there to prevent bacterial contamiation of the vaccine, while not interfering with the viruses.
> There are too many questions and not enough answers about this vaccine. In > addition, there does not appear to be a need to vaccinate against Chicken > pox - prevention of such a mild disease with a vaccine which is unproven > and contains such toxic ingredients is taking too great a risk for the > supposed benefits we would gain. Sure there are questions. But it is evidently clear that the benefits of this vaccine far outweigh the risks - which is true for every childhood vaccine.
Harpoon - 05 Jan 2005 22:50 GMT > Chicken pox vaccine: Unhealthy, unnecessary, useless Correction, that should read john: Unhealthy, unnecessary, useless
 Signature NWO UNIX Beast Computer XIII User ID 666110212090438206
Harpoon - 05 Jan 2005 22:50 GMT > Chicken pox vaccine: Unhealthy, unnecessary, useless The turning point in john's life came when he read a magazine article and came to the realization that conventional medicine and the government are in a mind control conspiracy. At NWO headquarters we had quite a laugh. That laughing suddenly ended when we realized john was preaching his moronic beliefs on cancer and childrens health newsgroups.
The sad part is, he has two children that he refuses to vaccinate. He also has four children that were vaccinated and have suffered no ill effects from it.
 Signature NWO UNIX Beast Computer XIII User ID 666110212090438206
john - 06 Jan 2005 10:42 GMT > > Chicken pox vaccine: Unhealthy, unnecessary, useless > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > That laughing suddenly ended when we realized john was preaching his > moronic beliefs on cancer and childrens health newsgroups. Classic Jerry. First you sit on a cancer newsgroup promoting Corporate Monopoly medicine while you suppress all alternative non-monopoly medicine in tandem with pharma shill Barrett disguised as "J". This is med that kills hundreds of thousands of people every year when they know it doesn't work, (as the Horwins found out http://www.whale.to/v/horwin1.html) while they suppress all alternatives, as the overwhelming evidence points out http://www.whale.to/m/therapies.html on top of the 780,000 they kill with mistakes http://www.whale.to/a/dean.html
Then you adopt a tagline of a device used to murder whales, and then proceed to harpoon yourself in the foot with basic ad hominem, a sure sign you have no argument.
All hostility is just fear at its core, fear that you are just another unpaid brainwashed Corporate pharma shill.
> The sad part is, he has two children that he refuses to vaccinate. He also > has four children that were vaccinated and have suffered no ill effects > from it. How would you know? Even some MDs can see the obvious http://www.whale.to/a/children1.html
john - 06 Jan 2005 16:37 GMT PS. Mr Harpo
You are displaying classic symptoms of ego-denial, where you have swallowed the Corporate propaganda hook line and sinker, also put a large amount of effort into spreading that propaganda (hence your site on orthodox cancer advice)---and then to avoid realising that you pick up the propaganda and hit anyone over the head with it.
Dr Freud
"In the entire history of man, no one has ever been brainwashed and realized, or believed, that he had been brainwashed. Those who have been brainwashed will usually passionately defend their manipulators, claiming they have simply been "shown the light" . . . or have been transformed in miraculous ways. --- Dick Sutphen http://www.whale.to/w/mind.html
Harpoon - 06 Jan 2005 20:21 GMT NWO is having a big cookout soon. Do you have any good whale recipes? If not, here is one we especially like
Grilled Whale C.C., South Africa
For 4 servings: 800 g whale in 1 cm thick slices 1 red onion ½ squash 1 yellow pepper 2 tomatoes melted butter for basting
Cut the meat into slices about 1-2 cm thick.
Baste with melted butter and grill the meat 2-3 minutes on each side.
Use your fingers to test if the meat is cooked. Raw meat is squashy, medium done is a little firmer, and well-done is firm.
Remove the whale steaks from the grill while still a little squashy, it will continue to cook itself and is juicy and tender while still a little red in the middle. Whalemeat can quickly get dry if it cooks too long, so good heat and short cooking time are important.
 Signature NWO UNIX Beast Computer XIII User ID 666110212090438206
PF Riley - 07 Jan 2005 04:24 GMT >800 g whale in 1 cm thick slices Well I'll be! I've never heard of an 800-gram whale!
PF
PF Riley - 07 Jan 2005 05:17 GMT >Chicken pox vaccine: Unhealthy, unnecessary, useless > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >when this normally benign disease of childhood can have serious >ramifications. Gosh, John, can't we just give them vitamin C, then? (Or is it vitamin A?)
>The federal government is considering subsidising the Chicken pox >(Varicella) vaccine for all Australian toddlers and 10 year olds. "I am very [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >risk of complications from this illness are those with serious immune >suppression. Huh? I thought you just said adults are at risk too! Did you mean only adults with SERIOUS immune suppression? First you complain we shouldn't immunize children against varieclla because adults will get sick from it, then you claim that "only" people with SERIOUS immune suppression need to worry! Make up your mind!
>Almost all of those who have died from chicken pox had been >treated prior to their deaths with steroids, anti-virals or other >immune-suppressive drugs. A lie. (Actually, TWO lies: anti-virals such as acyclovir are NOT "immune-suppressive.")
Here's an example. Six cases in Florida:
http://www.cdc.gov/epo/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4818a3.htm
One was taking low-dose oral steroids, and one was on chemotherapy. The rest: nada. (2/6 = "almost all?")
Three cases:
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00052600.htm
One had a single dose of steroids. (1/3 = "almost all?")
Another series of three cases:
http://www.cdc.gov/epo/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00047618.htm
One was taking prednisone. (1/3 = "almost all?")
And, the final word:
http://www.cdc.gov/nip/diseases/varicella/faqs-gen-disease.htm#5-die
"Can a healthy person with varicella die from the disease?
"Yes, many of the deaths and complications from chickenpox occur in previously healthy children and adults. From 1990 to 1994, before there was a vaccine available, there were about 50 chickenpox deaths in children and 50 chickenpox deaths in adults every year; most of these persons were healthy or did not have a medical illness (such as cancer) that placed them at higher risk of getting severe chickenpox."
>2- The experience in Japan, the country which has used this vaccine for the >longest time, has been that rather than preventing Chicken pox, vaccination >has simply moved the disease from children into adults - a time when this >normally benign disease can be more dangerous. Wrong. Another lie.
In fact, varicella was moving to adulthood already BEFORE the vaccine appeared in the U.S. and the U.K.:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=8 896538&dopt=Abstract
"The epidemiology of chickenpox appears to be changing: There has been an unexplained upward shift in the age distribution of cases over the last 20 years. This is reflected by increased consultations for chickenpox in general practices and more deaths in England and Wales. On the basis of hospital admissions for chickenpox in young adults, there is evidence of a similar trend in the United States."
>3- The Chicken pox vaccine is one of 3 childhood vaccines (including >injected polio [IPV] and rubella) which are cultured on the cell lines of >aborted human foetuses. During its production process, this vaccine is >actually passed through 3 different human foetal cell lines and one cell >line of an embryonic guinea pig. Unless you are a pro-life vegetarian, this makes no difference.
>4- Use of this vaccine has led to an increase in Herpes zoster (shingles) >infections in children. This painful illness used to be unheard of in young >people but is now becoming more and more common in countries where this >vaccine is used. Another lie. Two lies, in fact. There is not an increase in herpes zoster children, and herpes zoster is NOT "unheard of" in young people. I see perhaps half a dozen cases of herpes zoster a year in my pediatric practice. ALL of them are in teenagers who had natural varicella (no vaccine). I have never seen a case of zoster in a vaccinated child.
Also:
http://adc.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/85/2/83
Read the section "RISK OF HERPES ZOSTER FOLLOWING VACCINATION."
>5- This vaccine contains Neomycin produced by Merck Sharpe and Dohme. >According to the manufacturer >(http://www.merck.com/mrkshared/mmanual/section13/chapter153/153c.jsp), >Neomycin should only be used topically or orally - never injected because of >the high toxicity of this drug when injected. More tired old anti-vaccine nonsense. The dose makes the poison. Lidocaine is highly toxic when injected in a large enough dose, too. So would you prefer to have your lacerations sutured without it?
>There are too many questions and not enough answers about this vaccine. In >addition, there does not appear to be a need to vaccinate against Chicken >pox - prevention of such a mild disease with a vaccine which is unproven >and contains such toxic ingredients is taking too great a risk for the >supposed benefits we would gain. You would think so having been told all the lies above.
PF
john - 07 Jan 2005 08:20 GMT > A lie. (Actually, TWO lies: anti-virals such as acyclovir are NOT > "immune-suppressive.") [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > One was taking low-dose oral steroids, and one was on chemotherapy. > The rest: nada. (2/6 = "almost all?") Hardly an advert to vaccinate the whole population of children with another unsafe vaccine that isn't going to work. If everyone had been vaccinated you can bet they wouldn't have been saved by chickenpox vax. Usually, for example with measles deaths, half have usually been vaccinated, assuming you can get any data out of the government. The one measles death they showed on TV recently was in an immigrant family in Ireland, and that was on English TV! And they lie every day, so you can never believe anything they say anyway. I'd give a lot of money to get all the data on measles deaths but they wont let that out for obvious reasons.
Case 1. inhaled steroid therapy Case 2. treated with intravenous acyclovir and ceftriaxone Case 3. treated with intravenous acyclovir and antibiotics Case 4. prednisolone Case 5. immunosuppressive therapy Case 6. diabetes mellitus, asthma, and cirrhosis of the liver
john - 07 Jan 2005 08:46 GMT Varicella-related deaths among children--United States, 1997.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1998 May 15;47(18):365-8.PMID: 9603627; UI: 98264790 http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00052600.htm
Case 1 oral acetaminophen and diphenhydramine. oral acyclovir. intravenous ceftriaxone
Case 2 history of asthma, antipyretic and antipruritic medications, metered-dose inhalers and one dose of oral prednisone. intravenous ceftriaxone, nafcillin, and acyclovir.
Case 3 antibiotic regimen. intravenous methicillin and ceftriaxone, nafcillin and gentamycin, and intravenous acyclovir
> Gosh, John, can't we just give them vitamin C, then? (Or is it vitamin A?) C you ignorant moron. Good idea, how many more children have to die before you pharma shills use it? Including cot-death and the rest---100,000? I wont hold my breath, for sure. History doesn't hold out much hope either.
"In 1995, chickenpox suddenly became a major health problem. Six children were reported to have died from chickenpox; frequent and repeated TV coverage lasted for weeks without anyone mentioning that two of the six children had leukemia and the others were on cortico-steroids. ----HYPING VACCINES: AN INVESTIGATION By Dr. F. Edward Yazbak MD
john - 07 Jan 2005 09:07 GMT > A lie. (Actually, TWO lies: anti-virals such as acyclovir are NOT > "immune-suppressive.") Oh really. All drugs suppress the immune system, unlike vitamin C, but anyone other than a medical shill can see that.
I love your anti-viral VIRAMUNE? (nevirapine), an antiretroviral medication that is used in combination with other antiretrovirals to treat HIV-1 infection:
"Patients should be informed of: the possibility of severe liver disease or skin reactions associated with Viramune that may result in death." " Severe, life-threatening and in some cases fatal hepatoxicity [liver damage], including hepatic necrosis [liver death] and hepatic failure, has been reported in patients treated with Viramune." "Severe, life-threatening skin reactions, including fatal cases.have included cases of Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis [skin death]."
Isn't that some sort of immune suppression? I mean death isn't exactly an immune boost unless you think the next life is where your immune system was aiming for? I can see the earth's immune system might be behind that immune reaction, but not ours.
Have a look at the skin disease it caused, nice pics http://www.whale.to/a/scheff.html
David Wright - 09 Jan 2005 19:10 GMT >> A lie. (Actually, TWO lies: anti-virals such as acyclovir are NOT >> "immune-suppressive.") > >Oh really. All drugs suppress the immune system, unlike vitamin C, but >anyone other than a medical shill can see that. Well, actually, the only people who see that *all* drugs suppress the immune system are anti-vax loons.
>I love your anti-viral VIRAMUNE? (nevirapine), an antiretroviral >medication that is used in combination with other antiretrovirals to [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > >Isn't that some sort of immune suppression? If if it were an immune suppression, there'd be some sort of infection associated with it. In any case, HIV is already doing a number on the patient's immune system. (Well, that's in the real world. In John's universe, there is no HIV, or maybe there is, but it's man-made, or it's natural but it's harmless and it's the AZT that kills people, even the AIDS patients who don't take it. John is not hobbled by consistency.)
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)
john - 07 Jan 2005 15:29 GMT > >5- This vaccine contains Neomycin produced by Merck Sharpe and Dohme. > >According to the manufacturer [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Lidocaine is highly toxic when injected in a large enough dose, too. > So would you prefer to have your lacerations sutured without it? Vax spin. Of course, you say that with mercury, and then you have the combination effects
"We have demonstrated the toxicity of thimerosal by using it to kill neurons in culture. At 50 nanomolar thimerosal the neuron killing capacity/rate is about doubled with the addition of levels of aluminium found in vaccines. The aluminium alone at this level is not demonstrated to be toxic, so it is enhancing the toxicity of the thimerosal. It likely does this by increasing the rate that thimerosal breaks down releasing ethylmercury which is the toxic material" -------Testimony Prof Boyd Haley, University of Kentucky, Chair and Head of Chemistry.......
And it's not just the poison effect is it:
Neomycin impairs absorption (and may also increase excretion) of a broad variety of nutrients including carbohydrates, fats, calcium, iron, magnesium, nitrogen, potassium, sodium, folic acid, and vitamins A, B12, D, and K. (Faloon WW, et al. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1966 Jun 14;132(2):879-887; Hardison WG, Rosenberg IH.J Lab Clin Med. 1969 Oct;74(4):564-573; Robinson C, Weigly E. 1984, 46-54; Roe DA. 1985, 157-158.) Orally administered neomycin may inactivate vitamin B6. Orally administered neomycin impairs absorption of both beta-carotene and vitamin A. (Tuckerman M, Turco S. 1983, 215-222; Robinson C, Weigly E. 1984, 46-54; Barrowman JA, et al. Clin Sci. 1972 Apr;42(4):17P; Favaro RM, et al. Int J Vitam Nutr Res. 1994;64(2):98-103.) Orally administered neomycin impairs vitamin B12 absorption and has been shown to decrease vitamin B12 levels. (Tuckerman M, Turco S. 1983, 215-222; Robinson C, Weigly E. 1984, 46-54; Cullen RW, Oace SM. J Nutr. 1989 Oct;119(10):1399-1403..) Neomycin, taken orally, impairs vitamin K absorption and has been shown to decrease vitamin K levels. Extended use of neomycin internally would also exert a detrimental effect upon the probiotic intestinal flora responsible for vitamin K synthesis. (Robinson C, Weigly E. 1984, 46-54; Olson JA. Am J Clin Nutr. 1987 Apr;45(4):687-692; Salet J, et al. Arch Fr Pediatr. 1968 Oct;25(8):961.) Neomycin impairs calcium absorption when taken orally. (Roe DA. 1985, 157-158.) Neomycin impairs magnesium absorption as a result of maldigestion when taken orally. (Roe DA. 1985, 157-158.) Neomycin causes fat malabsorption when taken internally, especially due to mucosal damage in the small intestine. Diarrhea is a common consequence. Further, over an extended period this effect could also result in decreased absorption of fat soluble nutrients such as vitamins A, D, E and K. (Hardison WG, Rosenberg IH. J Lab Clin Med. 1969 Oct;74(4):564-573; Roe DA. 1985, 157-158; Ratnaike RN, Jones TE. Drugs Aging 1998 Sep;13(3):245-253.) Neomycin impairs lactose absorption when taken orally. (Roe DA. 1985, 157-158.) Neomycin impairs sucrose absorption when taken orally. (Roe DA. 1985, 157-158.) During the course of eliminating disease-causing bacteria, antibiotics taken internally will also usually destroy normally-occurring beneficial bacterial flora that form an integral part of the healthy intestinal ecology and assist digestive and immune functions. Diarrhea and yeast infections, including vaginal yeast, are common side-effects of the disruption of intestinal ecology and the creation of an environment more susceptible to proliferation of pathogenic levels of opportunistic yeast. (Matteuzzi D, et al. Ann Microbiol (Paris). 1983 May-Jun;134A(3):339-349; Linzenmeier G, et al. Zentralbl Bakteriol . 1979 Apr;243(2-3):326-335.)
Harpoon - 09 Jan 2005 21:15 GMT >>nothing of any significance Only a lunatic would post this nonsense on a website
http://whale.to/a/taylor.html "The outrageous physical, mental, and emotional assaults that Brice has endured as a mind controlled slave for the use of Illuminati gofers like Henry Kissinger and Bob Hope, ..."
NWO is working to determine how john has located such a vast amount of fraudulent information. http://whale.to/cancer/therapies1.htm is a WHOs WHO in Medical Fraud Scams.
 Signature NWO UBC XIII UID 666110212090438206
00doc - 08 Jan 2005 13:26 GMT Oh my.
You seem to have gotten his attention. He must be quite riled up since he is making even less sense than normal. You've really accentuated his flight of ideas.
 Signature 00doc
john - 08 Jan 2005 17:58 GMT > Oh my. > > You seem to have gotten his attention. He must be quite > riled up since he is making even less sense than normal. > You've really accentuated his flight of ideas. At least Riley gets my attention now and then, which is more than I can say for the rest of you pharma boys who don't have one argument to string between the lot of you. I humour him as I like an argument now and then as it beats kicking the dog or the kids.
"Three years ago I suffered a severe reaction to the varicella (chicken pox) vaccine. I has hospitalized for months with encephalomyloneurits, (parallysis), and have been left permanently disabled as a result. Anyone out there heard of other neuological problems following this vaccine." http://www.whale.to/vaccines/varicella5.html
00doc - 08 Jan 2005 19:20 GMT >> Oh my. >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > argument > to string between the lot of you. Well, not one that you seem capable of understanding anyway. I take it form the relative lucidity of today's post that have taken your medication. Good for you.
> I humour him as I like an argument > now and then as it beats kicking the dog or the kids. The fact that you find the arguments entertaining and not embarrassing is futher proof that you really are not comprehending all that is said.
 Signature 0doc
David Wright - 08 Jan 2005 21:59 GMT >>> Oh my. >>> [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] >embarrassing is futher proof that you really are not >comprehending all that is said. That's true, but think how many kickings his dog and kids have been spared thanks to Usenet.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)
Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com - 09 Jan 2005 06:18 GMT >>That's true, but think how many kickings his dog and kids have been spared thanks to Usenet.<<
You know, I wonder if that's true in general. In retrospect have we seen episodes of family violence start to decline in strange and unexpected ways, since circa 1995 when Joe Averageman got his 486 machine and modem?
Boy it's funny how many things the internet has changed for good, and so completely, that we've forgotten them already.
Like, remember when there was a debate about adults having *pornography*? Sexually explicit material!? LOL. The Supreme Court used to worry about this. A more irrelevent and uninforcable issue today I can't imagine. MIght as well try to outlaw cussing on the telephone.
SBH
David Wright - 09 Jan 2005 19:18 GMT >>>That's true, but think how many kickings his dog and kids have been >spared thanks to Usenet.<< [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >unexpected ways, since circa 1995 when Joe Averageman got his 486 >machine and modem? It's possible. But any sweeping technological change is bound to have a large number of consequences, most of them unforseen. You mentioned pornography, but that was also given a huge boost by the advent of the VCR, even before home Internet service was available.
My personal position is that the presence of the Internet, in the form of Usenet and chat groups, has been an amazing proliferation of both sense and nonsense. It's also allowed various groups of loons to find each other more easily. Even beyond that, with the real nutcases like John-boy, it allows their delusional structures to harden like stale cheesecake.
There's more than one reason for that last observation, but two stick out. First, they can find much more source material to "confirm" whatever lunatic beliefs they hold, not to mention a large number of new lunatic beliefs (viz John's more recent additions of "chemtrails" and the evils of cell phone towers, plus the comical "orgone" devices that neutralize the evil mind-control features of the cell phone towers).
Second, with wider exposure comes wider opposition. Some people might start to question their beliefs in the face of contrary evidence, but the Scudamore's of this world merely classify any opposition as evidence of their rightness. He used to be less nutty than he is now, though not a lot less. I've seen the same thing happen with other posters.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)
David Wright - 08 Jan 2005 21:58 GMT >> Oh my. >> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >between the lot of you. I humour him as I like an argument now and then as >it beats kicking the dog or the kids. Many posters cannot get John's attention, but not through any fault of their own. He has a habit of killfiling anyone who disagrees with him. Why PF Riley and Steve Harris aren't in his killfile remains a mystery.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)
PF Riley - 08 Jan 2005 22:18 GMT >>At least Riley gets my attention now and then, which is more than I can say >>for the rest of you pharma boys who don't have one argument to string [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >him. Why PF Riley and Steve Harris aren't in his killfile remains a >mystery. It's because he knows my arguments are correct and fears me having the last word. He has to keep tabs on what I'm saying, and get a final paranoid rant in afterwards, in order to continue offering his gullible followers at least some degree of relief from the truth.
PF
Jan - 08 Jan 2005 22:40 GMT >Subject: Re: Chicken pox vaccine: Unhealthy, unnecessary, useless >From: PF Riley pfriley@watt-not.com [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > >It's because he knows my arguments are correct and fears me LOL!!
Naracissism at it's finest.
In fact:
>A truth’s initial commotion is directly proportional to how deeply the lie >was believed…When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the >masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its >speaker, a raving lunatic. -Dresden James Mark Probert - 09 Jan 2005 15:53 GMT > >Subject: Re: Chicken pox vaccine: Unhealthy, unnecessary, useless > >From: PF Riley pfriley@watt-not.com [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > >A truth's initial commotion is directly proportional to how deeply the lie
> >was believed.When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the
> >masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its > >speaker, a raving lunatic. -Dresden James David Wright - 09 Jan 2005 06:06 GMT >>>At least Riley gets my attention now and then, which is more than I can say >>>for the rest of you pharma boys who don't have one argument to string [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] >paranoid rant in afterwards, in order to continue offering his >gullible followers at least some degree of relief from the truth. He has followers? Anyone gullible enough to become one would be immune to anything you might say in rebuttal.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)
PF Riley - 08 Jan 2005 22:21 GMT >At least Riley gets my attention now and then, which is more than I can say >for the rest of you pharma boys who don't have one argument to string >between the lot of you. Gosh, I'm flattered.
>I humour him as I like an argument now and then as it beats kicking >the dog or the kids. Ah, at least abusing animals and children ranks second to Usenet debate as John's preferred method of entertainment. What's third? Throwing rocks at cars?
PF
john - 09 Jan 2005 09:59 GMT > Ah, at least abusing animals and children ranks second to Usenet > debate as John's preferred method of entertainment. What's third? > Throwing rocks at cars? I said instead of. Abusing kids is something vaccinators are best at, so be careful about throwing stones when you live in a glass house.
>It's because he knows my arguments are correct and fears me having the >last word. He has to keep tabs on what I'm saying, and get a final >paranoid rant in afterwards, in order to continue offering his >gullible followers at least some degree of relief from the truth. Self delusion and self flattery are an unpretty combination, but fit you well. An allopath lecturing on truth is as absurd as a tramp lecturing on good housekeeping--but does illustrate the depth of medical propaganda prevalent that you can talk such nonsense and, presumably, believe it. Top marks for medical brainwashing.
The only reason to collect followers is for their money, something you lot have done to perfection, witness your fleecing of the taxpayer every year to the tune of ?50 Billion or so in the UK alone. God save me from followers, I don't want them cluttering up my driveway, and you only end up despising them, like you do yours. I prefer someone who can think for themselves, one of them is worth a million followers at least.
I just like kicking your posts, someone has to, and those of us who really are interested in the truth like to find someone with half an argument now and then to test the truth.
zipzip - 09 Jan 2005 11:20 GMT i was never immunized and caught chicken pox at 25 from someone who had shingles (my father actually). trust me you want the vaccination.
this conversation is moronic as none of your are qualified to make any distinctions whatsoever on the issue. its a ploy for ad homineim attacks. stop beating around the bush.
00doc - 09 Jan 2005 13:53 GMT > i was never immunized and caught chicken pox at 25 from > someone who [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > homineim > attacks. stop beating around the bush. Several of us, actually most of us if nto all of us, are well qualified to make distinctions on this topic. The problem is that not only are we qualified enough to do so we have done so on many occasions. After a while the same arguments get tiresome. Usually we just ignore John but every once in a while decide to just have some fun at his expense.
In case you haven't noticed - everyone in this thread, with one possible exception, is in favor of the vaccination.
 Signature 00doc
john - 10 Jan 2005 10:51 GMT > In case you haven't noticed - everyone in this thread, with > one possible exception, is in favor of the vaccination. See the depth of argument I have to put up with--another for my killfile of timewasters
Every newgroup is infested with pharma fleas like Wright, Bowshit, Probert, Carey, Harpoon etc, plus shills like Putz and Barrett (J), then you ahve the million or so workers in the medical industry eg you, who spend their lives dishing out drugs like vaccines, for profit and income, plus the millions of brainwashed parents who want to believe they are doing the right thing, and don't want to face the reality as it would upset their world
Harpoon - 11 Jan 2005 02:46 GMT >> In case you haven't noticed - everyone in this thread, with >> one possible exception, is in favor of the vaccination. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > brainwashed parents who want to believe they are doing the right thing, and > don't want to face the reality as it would upset their world john, how nice it would be if you would tell us your story.
Why are you qualified to give parents medical advice?
Why should anyone pay attention to you?
Why are you so angry?
Why do you say such bad things about the imaginary cartel?
 Signature NWO UBC XIII UID 666110212090438206
Jan - 11 Jan 2005 04:01 GMT >Subject: Re: Chicken pox vaccine: Unhealthy, unnecessary, useless >From: Harpoon spamandidiotsabound@whale.to [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > >Why are you qualified to give parents medical advice? Say Harpoon, I asked you a qestion about Peter Bowditch's qualifications to be an advisor on an anti-quackery committee.
You didn't answer.
Question to tuff for ya??
Jan
Coleah - 11 Jan 2005 04:40 GMT > Say Harpoon, I asked you a qestion about Peter Bowditch's qualifications > to be [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Jan Ah, Jan....that would be a belittling 'question'.
You and You Alone are responsible for your unChristian attitude.
Peter Bowditch - 11 Jan 2005 08:50 GMT misc.kids.health,sci.med,sci.med.nursing,uk.people.health restored
>>Subject: Re: Chicken pox vaccine: Unhealthy, unnecessary, useless >>From: Harpoon spamandidiotsabound@whale.to [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > >Jan Jan says that she never diverts.
Here we have Jan asking someone she has never met, who is not a regular participant in the newsgroup misc.health.alternative (the only group she bothered to send the message to) and who would not know me from a bottlebrush tree, to make a comment about something which happened in 2002 and which caused her to get her corset in a twist.
But she never diverts a conversation.
Is it any wonder that Jan called citing the Bible "stupidity"? She must spit on the Bible every day.
 Signature Peter Bowditch The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
Hulda Clark Got Zapped - 11 Jan 2005 15:29 GMT Jan Drew jdrew63929@aol.com wrote:
>Say Harpoon, I asked you a qestion about Peter Bowditch's qualifications to >be >an advisor on an anti-quackery committee. His qualifications? They are excellent. Visit www.ratbags.com for all the specifics, including his CV.
>You didn't answer. See above.
>Question to tuff for ya?? Nah, he just figured that in all the time you've been demonizing Peter B you would have taken the time to read his CV. Obviously, your rage blinded you to the very answers you seek.
Sad, that.
>Jan Mark Probert - 11 Jan 2005 23:22 GMT reposted so Harpoon can get a chance to respond, Jan uses AOL which removes crossposts.
Note to Harpoon...set your newsreader's follow-up to all the newsgroups, and Jan will respond to all the Newsgroups. AOL does not remove that.
> >Subject: Re: Chicken pox vaccine: Unhealthy, unnecessary, useless > >From: Harpoon spamandidiotsabound@whale.to [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > > Jan Harpoon - 12 Jan 2005 02:57 GMT > reposted so Harpoon can get a chance to respond, Jan uses AOL which removes > crossposts. > > Note to Harpoon...set your newsreader's follow-up to all the newsgroups, and > Jan will respond to all the Newsgroups. AOL does not remove that. Thank you Robert. I saw Jan's post and ignored it.
>>>Subject: Re: Chicken pox vaccine: Unhealthy, unnecessary, useless >>>From: Harpoon spamandidiotsabound@whale.to [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] >> >> Jan I believe my question was addressed to john. I don't speak for anyone else so don't waste my time with silly questions.
http://www.whale.to/b/blood_q.html "Elvisʼ close friend Wayne Newton is highly suspected as also being a slave. Elvis worked with Burt Reynolds and Jerry Lee Lewis who also connect in with the Illuminatiʼs mind-control operations. "
 Signature NWO UBC XIII UID 666110212090438206
Harpoon - 09 Jan 2005 21:30 GMT > and those of us who really > are interested in the truth http://whale.to/vaccine/webmaster.html "The webmaster is a 50 yr old (UK) father to 6 kids, the last two (5 & 8) being unvaccinated. He started to look into cancer therapies when he came across a copy of Nexus Magazine, where he discovered the suppression of cancer therapies (something his father died of after surgery & radiation therapy). He then started on vaccination 8 years ago after being handed a copy of Walene James book on vaccination by the Naturopath Kiki Sidhwa."
The truth is, john is not qualified to render medical opinions or advice. It requires more than reading a magazine and a book to become proficient and reputable in medicine. Collecting and organizing quotes is also useless.
 Signature NWO UBC XIII UID 666110212090438206
Harpoon - 09 Jan 2005 21:20 GMT > "Three years ago I suffered a severe reaction to the varicella (chicken pox) > vaccine. I has hospitalized for months with encephalomyloneurits, > (parallysis), and have been left permanently disabled as a result. Anyone > out there heard of other neuological problems following this vaccine." > http://www.whale.to/vaccines/varicella5.html I was unaware that varicella also causes lunacy in isolated cases.
 Signature NWO UBC XIII UID 666110212090438206
Harpoon - 10 Jan 2005 18:33 GMT > "Three years ago I suffered a severe reaction to the varicella (chicken pox) > vaccine. I has hospitalized for months with encephalomyloneurits, > (parallysis), and have been left permanently disabled as a result. Anyone > out there heard of other neuological problems following this vaccine." > http://www.whale.to/vaccines/varicella5.html This isolated incident took place in 1995. Hardly justification to condemn all vaccines and all of conventional medicine. Nor is it justification to promote and peddle useless treatments. Your website is a portal for medical fraud. The CAI/NASA are investigating your website and a connection to a vaccine company in Europe.
You are a mindless idiot as proven by the material on your website. http://www.whale.to/w/perry.html "THE POLARITY OF MASS."
"When it was found that changing the mass of the stone would alter the quality of the energy lines connected to it and itʼs influence on the Earth Energy system, it was decided to experiment to find the basic laws that may apply to it. A concrete lawn curb was laid flat on the grass and tested for itʼs polarity value which is the same at each end. It was noted that the value changed as the slab was rotated. When it was aligned with magnetic north, the value was positive 84 as dowsed on the percentage protractor or a metre rule. We have seen above, that the value will change if the mass is altered, so small pieces of concrete were added until the polarity read 100% positive. It was then rotated to the East-West alignment where the reading was 100% negative at each end. A zero reading was obtained when it was aligned either NortheastSouthwest or Northwest-Southeast. All the intermediate readings were available between a zero line and the 100% positive or negative line."
Is there anyone on planet earth that believes this "experiment" is scientifically valid?
 Signature NWO UBC XIII UID 666110212090438206
john - 11 Jan 2005 09:06 GMT E-NEWS FROM THE NATIONAL VACCINE INFORMATION CENTER Vienna, Virginia http://www.nvic.org
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * UNITED WAY/COMBINED FEDERAL CAMPAIGN #9119 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
"Protecting the health and informed consent rights of children since 1982."
============================================================================ ============== BL Fisher Note: The expense of trying to "eradicate" chickenpox with a universal second dose of vaccine must be accurately evaluated by taking into consideration the fact that the live virus vaccine itself can cause vaccine strain infection. Also, the increase in shingles in our child and adult population is a result of mass vaccination policies which do not allow those who have recovered naturally from the disease with a qualitatively superior immunity (99.99 percent) to be naturally boosted by coming into contact with the natural disease. Chicken pox never has been a serious, life threatening disease for 99.9 plus percent of the population. The better route would have been to find ways to help those who get chicken pox naturally recover without sequelae.
http://www.dailynews.com/Stories/0,1413,200~20954~2642466,00.html Los Angeles Daily News
Eradicating chickenpox worth price? Cost of second shot for kids weighed By Susan FitzGerald The Philadelphia Inquirer
Saturday, January 08, 2005 - PHILADELPHIA -- Nearly a decade after a new chickenpox vaccine began driving down the number of children getting the itchy red spots, the federal government now has an ambitious goal: to try to eliminate the disease from this country.
Health officials want chickenpox, which afflicts an estimated 600,000 people a year, to go the way of other illnesses such as measles and mumps that were once a routine part of childhood.
But to get there, it might mean giving children a second shot of the chickenpox vaccine.
That would be good news for the vaccine's maker, Merck & Co. But some doctors say it's not clear whether it would be worth the cost and effort involved in adding another shot to a crowded lineup of childhood immunizations.
A large federally funded study in Philadelphia is allowing health officials to measure the effectiveness of the one-dose regimen, and decide whether a second dose is warranted.
"We would like to try to eliminate varicella," the virus that causes chickenpox, said Dr. Jane Seward, head of the viral vaccine branch at the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. "The basic goal of any program should be decreasing disease to the lowest extent possible if that's not an undue burden on society."
Introduced in 1995, the vaccine was not intended to wipe out chickenpox, but to significantly lessen the toll of the disease.
About 4 million people a year in this country, predominantly children, used to get chickenpox, a highly infectious viral disease that spreads from person to person by direct contact or through airborne droplets from coughing and sneezing.
Most weather the discomfort -- fever and sometimes hundreds of blisters that scab over -- without much trouble. But about 100 people died and 11,000 were hospitalized annually with complications such as pneumonia and encephalitis, a potentially deadly brain inflammation.
Right now children receive a single dose of vaccine between the ages of 1 year and 18 months. But some children who get the shot come down with so-called breakthrough cases of chickenpox that are usually milder.
"It's been a very successful program to date," Seward said. "But can we do even better? ... Ten years into the program is it still acceptable for children to get 20 lesions and miss three or four days of school?"
CDC officials decided in the fall to pursue the goal of eliminating the transmission of chickenpox in the United States. It would still crop up from time to time, in the same way measles do, but "you don't have a case going to a case going to a case," Seward said.
The CDC is doing a cost-benefit analysis of a second shot, she said, but no decision has been made on whether it is warranted.
Adding another shot to the lineup of childhood immunizations would not be done lightly, in part because children already get as many as 22 shots by the age of 2.
Money is also an issue. The chickenpox vaccine used in this country, Merck's Varivax, has a wholesale price of $65.09 per dose, though it usually sells for less.
Dr. Robert Baltimore, a Yale University pediatrician and infectious-disease specialist who serves on the American Academy of Pediatrics' infectious disease committee, said the question that needs to be considered is whether a second dose would provide "sufficient impact to have a public health benefit."
"It's not good for kids to get sick," he said. But on the other hand, there is cost and office time involved in giving another shot, and there may be "a limit on the number of vaccines the public is willing to accept," he said.
Dr. Mark Warner of Drexel Hill Pediatrics said that from his perspective the one-dose approach is very effective.
"I'm not seeing a whole lot of breakthrough cases, and the ones I do see are not so sick," he said.
"It's not like doctors are begging" to add another shot, Warner said.
Merck in August submitted an application to the Food and Drug Administration for a four-prong vaccine, called ProQuad, against measles, mumps, rubella and chickenpox. If the vaccine is approved, the decision to add a second dose of chickenpox vaccine could be easier since a second measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) shot is already given.
The Philadelphia study, in the meantime, is giving the CDC a wealth of data on the status of chickenpox in the vaccine era. A network of hospitals, doctors offices and other sites reports suspicious rashes to the city health department, which then investigates.
One evening in November, nurse Karl Heath went to the home of LaShona Moment in the city's Wynnefield neighborhood. When her 8-year-old twins broke out in red spots in October, Moment suspected they had chickenpox, even though one had the vaccine and the other had the disease as a baby.
"We want to know if children who got the vaccine are getting chickenpox," said Heath, who pricked the index fingers of Malik and his sister Maliyah.
It's not always easy to identify chickenpox since a mild case can resemble bug bites. As it turned out, the repeat blood tests on the Moment twins ruled out chickenpox.
The Philadelphia study shows that vaccinated children still have about a 2 percent chance per year of getting chickenpox, though these breakthrough cases have far fewer lesions, said Dr. Barbara Watson, medical specialist with the city's immunization program.
The study is also documenting the steep decline of the disease. In 1995, there were 1,197 reported cases of chickenpox in west Philadelphia; in 2003, there were 130.
This time of year is the start of chickenpox season. The health department is investigating nine cases at a northeast Philadelphia school -- a mere shadow of former outbreaks.
"In the old days, you'd have 600 kids out of school at any point during an outbreak," said Watson, a consultant for Merck.
Still, not all children respond to the current vaccine. "With one dose, if you're a vaccinated child in school and have very close exposure, you have a one-in-five chance of developing disease," Seward said. "We should anticipate that after two doses, that risk would be 7 percent."
But even if a second dose of chickenpox vaccine is recommended, it doesn't mean that the virus will fade away.
After the active stage of infection, the chickenpox virus, called varicella-zoster, lies dormant in nerves along the spinal cord and can re-emerge years later as a painful rash called shingles. Shingles provide another route for the spread of chickenpox. A person with shingles can infect someone with chickenpox if they lack immunity to the virus.
Merck is testing a shingles vaccine that is aimed at preventing the rash in older people. The vaccine might by extension help lower the incidence of chickenpox because "it may be able to reduce shingles as a source of transmission of the varicella-zoster virus," said Michael Oxman, an infectious-disease doctor at the VA Medical Center in San Diego who is heading a nationwide trial of the shingles vaccine.
But, he said, as long as people harbor the virus, chickenpox can't be completely wiped out.
Starting this year, the CDC is making chickenpox reportable, which will allow health officials to better track the disease's remaining hold.
Watson said she senses a shift in parental attitudes since the chickenpox vaccine became available almost a decade ago.
Skeptical parents used to reason, "'I had chickenpox and I survived. What's the big deal?"' she said. "Now there's been enough education for parents to know that 100 kids dying and 11,000 being hospitalized is a big deal."
============================================= News@nvic.org is a free service of the National Vaccine Information Center and is supported through membership donations. Learn more about vaccines, diseases and how to protect your informed consent rights http://www.nvic.org
Become a member and support NVIC's work https://www.909shot.com/Making%20Cash%20Donations.htm
To sign up for a free e-mail subscription http://www.nvic.org/emaillist.htm
NVIC is funded through individual membership donations and does not receive government funding. Barbara Loe Fisher, President and Co-founder. NOTE: This is not an interactive e-mail list. Please do not respond to messages.
Harpoon - 11 Jan 2005 23:08 GMT > E-NEWS FROM THE NATIONAL VACCINE INFORMATION CENTER john, I think the batteries are failing in your PowerWand. maybe your website has directions on how to charge it up and adjust the Succor Punch Frequency Generator,have a look here: http://www.whale.to/b/cr39.html
I did find this useful information there: "Here's my theory on how the PowerWand works: The world is ruled through a predatory/parasitic thoughtform. Whoever identifies with these things is susceptible to being dissolved by the Power Wand's directed, focused energy. The degree of dissolution is in direct proportion to that person's demonstrated commitment to predatory action. They higher up the dungheap that a person is, the more mayhem and murder he/she must have committed, therefore the more vulnerable to this device. Just like the in Hitler's SS, advancement in the New World Order is measured by the height of the pile of corpses in one's personal resume. The Love and Light gurus are window dressing, only. They don't participate in the grisly stuff, but their programmers do."
john, have you been vaccinated for the dumbass virus?
 Signature NWO UBC XIII UID 666110212090438206
|
|
|