Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Alternative / November 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

SafeMinds' Report Shows CDC Ignored Autism-Mercury Data

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
john - 23 Nov 2004 16:38 GMT
Press Release

Source: SafeMinds

SafeMinds' Report Shows CDC Ignored Autism-Mercury Data
Monday November 22, 12:49 pm ET

Documents Show Agency Discovered Elevated Autism Risks and Withheld From
Public/Congress

WASHINGTON, Nov. 22 /PRNewswire/ -- SafeMinds -- America's leading
scientific organization investigating the links between mercury and autism
-- has released a report showing that government analysts were aware of a
potential vaccine-autism link as early as 1999, but hid that information
from the public and Congressional inquiry.

The SafeMinds study, "Generation Zero," details these initial findings
based on data contained in spreadsheets and related email traffic from
former Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) research fellow,
Dr. Thomas Verstraeten. In his analysis, secured by SafeMinds through a
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, Verstraeten examined the
connection between mercury exposure and childhood disease for the first
time. SafeMinds board member and published researcher Mark Blaxill prepared
the review and chose the title "Generation Zero" for two reasons: 1) the
CDC analysis compared autism risks in children with high thimerosal
exposure levels to children with zero exposure levels, a logical approach
they abandoned later; and 2) these CDC analyses preceded four subsequent
generations of reports that an earlier Safe Minds study designated
Generation One through Four.

"Verstraeten's initial analysis reveals two important facts," Blaxill said.
"First, CDC official were aware in 1999 of an eleven fold increase in
autism risk in children who received vaccines containing thimerosal versus
children who received no exposure. Second, in four subsequent generations
of reports using this data, the CDC never revealed their initial risk
findings to the Institute of Medicine, nor to Congress when called upon to
present evidence during relevant hearings."

Thimerosal, a mercury-containing preservative used for years in many
vaccines, lies at the center of the vaccine-autism debate. Although the
dangers of early childhood mercury exposure have long been recognized,
vaccines, including those given to infants, still contain this potent
neurotoxin.

"In the most straightforward analysis of the risk of mercury exposure in
children, Verstraeten discovered significant extremely elevated risks of
autism as well as a range of childhood developmental disorder including
ADHD and sleep disorders. In emails accompanying his analyses, Verstraeten
invited his colleagues to find ways to explain away these findings.
Predictably, his alarming analyses were suppressed by the CDC. Only
watered-down reports were ever shared and fourth of these was made public
several years late, discounting any autism-mercury link," continued Blaxill.

    CONTACT: Mark Blaxill, 617-875-9334   
Mark.Blaxill@BCG.com
Mark Probert - 23 Nov 2004 17:31 GMT
> Press Release
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> connection between mercury exposure and childhood disease for the first
> time. SafeMinds board member and published researcher Mark Blaxill

His expertise:

http://www.bcg.com/practice/experts_detail.jsp?id=64

prepared
> the review and chose the title "Generation Zero" for two reasons: 1) the
> CDC analysis compared autism risks in children with high thimerosal
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>     CONTACT: Mark Blaxill, 617-875-9334   
> Mark.Blaxill@BCG.com
Ilena Rose - 23 Nov 2004 17:43 GMT
>His expertise:

www.humanticsfoundation.com/PropagandistProbert.html
Mark Probert - 23 Nov 2004 22:27 GMT
"Ilena Rose" <ilena@san.rr.com> in her official capacity as the Directrix of
the FDA DE-listed, San Diego DE-licensed, and apparently DE-funct Humantics
Foundation, wrote in message
news:9lt6q0dlopa08a4gv1v8bonnrbqdi0gto4@4ax.com...

> >His expertise:
>
> www.humanticsfoundation.com/PropagandistProbert.html

Beats a BA in psycho-ology.
Peter Bowditch - 24 Nov 2004 00:22 GMT
>"Ilena Rose" <ilena@san.rr.com> in her official capacity as the Directrix of
>the FDA DE-listed, San Diego DE-licensed, and apparently DE-funct Humantics
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>Beats a BA in psycho-ology.

Careful there, Mark.

http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles/onews/ba1988.htm

Signature

Peter Bowditch
The Millenium Project
    http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud
    http://www.acahf.org.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

Dr Wilson Paging Jan Drew - 24 Nov 2004 02:01 GMT
>>"Ilena Rose" <ilena@san.rr.com> in her official capacity as the Directrix of
>>the FDA DE-listed, San Diego DE-licensed, and apparently DE-funct Humantics
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles/onews/ba1988.htm

I second the motion.  I was "awarded" a BA in Psychology at UNC in 1988.  What
a coincidence!
Mark Probert - 24 Nov 2004 14:17 GMT
> >>"Ilena Rose" <ilena@san.rr.com> in her official capacity as the Directrix of
> >>the FDA DE-listed, San Diego DE-licensed, and apparently DE-funct Humantics
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> I second the motion.  I was "awarded" a BA in Psychology at UNC in 1988.  What
> a coincidence!

Yours in in psychology. BIG difference.
Mark Probert - 24 Nov 2004 14:15 GMT
> >"Ilena Rose" <ilena@san.rr.com> in her official capacity as the Directrix of
> >the FDA DE-listed, San Diego DE-licensed, and apparently DE-funct Humantics
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles/onews/ba1988.htm

Yours in in psychology. BIG difference.
Ilena Rose - 24 Nov 2004 14:30 GMT
>> >"Ilena Rose" <ilena@san.rr.com> in her official capacity as the Directrix
>of
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
>Yours in in psychology. BIG difference.

Only in QuackLand .... you still denying you have a Law Degree you're
not allowed to use, Marla?

www.humanticsfoundation.com/PropagandistProbert.html#NYLawFundPays 6
Probert clients
PF Riley - 24 Nov 2004 07:11 GMT
>Press Release
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>potential vaccine-autism link as early as 1999, but hid that information
>from the public and Congressional inquiry.

I love how these fringe groups always write press releases lauding
themselves as "leading organizations."

They are actually America's leading political organization pursuing
proof of a single hypothesis while discounting and/or ignoring
alternative theories or contrary data. It has nothing to do with
science.

PF
john - 24 Nov 2004 09:54 GMT
> They are actually America's leading political organization pursuing
> proof of a single hypothesis while discounting and/or ignoring
> alternative theories or contrary data. It has nothing to do with
> science.
>
> PF

LOL.  How come none of you vaccinators are actually studying the MMR autism
children if you are so keen on science?

What are the alternative theories I beg to ask.  I know, autism was there
but we couldn't see it as it was hidden under another name!  Funny how it
was non existant in 1890, at least (I have read 40 books on smallpox with
numerous stats and not one peep)  and came around after mass mercury DPT
vaccination
PF Riley - 25 Nov 2004 04:57 GMT
>> They are actually America's leading political organization pursuing
>> proof of a single hypothesis while discounting and/or ignoring
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>LOL.  How come none of you vaccinators are actually studying the MMR autism
>children if you are so keen on science?

Huh? There have been plenty of scientific studies ad nauseum. No one
could confirm Wakefield's initial findings, even when studying entire
countries and millions of children. (And why are you asking for
"vaccinators" to do the studies anyway when you would most certainly
discount them simply because they were done by "vaccinators"?) Oh, and
then Wakefield's co-authors said their study was a load of crap and
apologized for the damage they've done, Wakefield was caught lying
about his monetary incentive to lie, and the respected journal that
published his article said they shouldn't have published it. The
matter is closed.

>What are the alternative theories I beg to ask.  I know, autism was there
>but we couldn't see it as it was hidden under another name!

You are correct.

>Funny how it
>was non existant in 1890, at least (I have read 40 books on smallpox with
>numerous stats and not one peep)  and came around after mass mercury DPT
>vaccination

It was described in the 1890's, and more formally in the 1920's. DPT
vaccination began in the 1940's.

You're an idiot.

PF
john - 25 Nov 2004 09:41 GMT
> Huh? There have been plenty of scientific studies ad nauseum. No one
> could confirm Wakefield's initial findings, even when studying entire
> countries and millions of children. (And why are you asking for
> "vaccinators" to do the studies anyway when you would most certainly
> discount them simply because they were done by "vaccinators"?)

"studying entire countries" rather proves my point--just  Epidemiology
http://www.whale.to/a/epidemiology_q.html

Only Wakefield and a handful of scientists independent from the medical
industry and government are studying the children.  And yes, vaccinators
only study to cover up, as the hundreds of studies they have produced so far
show, so good point, but pity for the kids.  And the thousands of parent
observations would normally have withdrawn a drug, but not the holy grail
called vaccines.  They have to be dismissed as "observations or anecdotes"

>Oh, and
> then Wakefield's co-authors said their study was a load of crap and
> apologized for the damage they've done, Wakefield was caught lying
> about his monetary incentive to lie, and the respected journal that
> published his article said they shouldn't have published it. The
> matter is closed.

get the facts, not lies http://www.whale.to/a/wakefield.html
David Wright - 30 Nov 2004 03:10 GMT
>> They are actually America's leading political organization pursuing
>> proof of a single hypothesis while discounting and/or ignoring
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>LOL.  How come none of you vaccinators are actually studying the MMR autism
>children if you are so keen on science?

No real reason to do so.  Given the lack of correlation of MMR to
austim, if MMR ever *does* cause autism, it's very very rare.

A woman I know works in special education, mostly autistic kids.
She just laughs at the idea that the vaccines are doing it; she says
if you see the kids before vaccination, the signs of impending autism
are clear.  The vaccine is just a scapegoat.

>What are the alternative theories I beg to ask.  I know, autism was there
>but we couldn't see it as it was hidden under another name!  Funny how it
>was non existant in 1890, at least (I have read 40 books on smallpox with
>numerous stats and not one peep)  and came around after mass mercury DPT
>vaccination

Hardly.  Even historically, it is clear that the stories about
"changelings" are really referring to autistic kids.

 -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
      "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
          were standing on my shoulders."  (Hal Abelson, MIT)
David Wright - 27 Nov 2004 00:14 GMT
>>Press Release
>>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>alternative theories or contrary data. It has nothing to do with
>science.

If Safe Minds is the "leading" organization, I shudder to think of the
quality of the output of the less-illustrious ones.

 -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
      "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
          were standing on my shoulders."  (Hal Abelson, MIT)
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.