http://www.healthsentinel.com/news.php?event=news_print_list_item&id=363
Charles Arthur, "Power lines double risk of cancer in children",
Independent, October 30, 2004,
Link: http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/health_medical/story.jsp?story=577526
Living near a high-voltage power line roughly doubles the risk of
childhood cancers such as leukaemia, scientists say.
Dr Gerald Draper of the Oxford-based Childhood Cancer Research Group
said a recent study he led looked at 35,000 cases of childhood
leukaemia and other cancers between 1962 and 1995, and results suggest
a slightly higher chance of children living within 100 metres of a
high-tension overhead cable developing the disease.
But he angrily denied claims that the work had been suppressed by
himself or the Department of Health, which commissioned the study. He
also emphasised that the link to childhood cancers was weak.
An independent group, the Trentham Environmental Action Campaign,
estimated the power-line effect would cause between two and six of the
500-odd cases of child leukaemia reported each year in Britain. On
average, one in 2,000 children under 15 develops leukaemia, and there
are 1,500 childhood cancers each year. Some international studies have
shown children exposed to the highest electromagnetic fields (EMF) in
the home - as it often is in houses below power lines - are twice as
likely to suffer leukaemia as children exposed to low EMF.
About 0.5 per cent of the UK population live in houses above that
level, says the National Radiological Protection Board, which advises
the Government on hazards from radiation.
Maureen Asbury, president of the Trentham campaign, said: "The
Government should act now. We aren't prepared to wait 10 years while
they dither. First, ministers should legislate against building houses
near power lines. Then they should set up a project to remove the
lines that traverse homes. We know it can't be done immediately, but
it needs to be started."
But Dr Draper dismissed claims made on Sky News that he or the
Department of Health had tried to keep the findings secret. "We hope
to submit our paper, which is now complete, to a journal in about a
fortnight for publication," he said. "But it is untrue to say the DoH
is suppressing this work: it has been among those pressing me to get
it published.
"Second, even if it wanted to suppress them, my contract allows me to
publish what I want."
Sky News had claimed the results of the study were kept under wraps
for three years, after being presented in 2001. Dr Draper said he had
had no results to discuss in 2001. "About 18 months ago, I ran a
private workshop with other scientists to talk about my preliminary
findings, which were fuzzy; I did not understand them fully myself and
wanted to see if there were other explanations."
He rechecked the calculations to produce the final report. The study
does not find the biological mechanism by which power lines might
increase the risk of cancers.
Mark Probert - 30 Oct 2004 16:02 GMT
> http://www.healthsentinel.com/news.php?event=news_print_list_item&id=363
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> a slightly higher chance of children living within 100 metres of a
> high-tension overhead cable developing the disease.
That is an incredibly long period, and I wonder if the researchers
controlled for things such as changes in power line technology, poverty,
etc. Draper, however, looks like he specializes in studying environmentally
based cancer clusters.
It is never a good idea to rely solely on news articles for your
information.
Ilena Rose - 30 Oct 2004 16:11 GMT
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 15:02:59 GMT, "Mark Probert" <Mark
Probert@lumbercartel.com> is a Junk Science / Quack Flack ... both
junkscience.com and acsh.org with their Quacky front groups have been
funded for years to lie about this issue.
www.humanticsfoundation.com/PropagandistProbert.html
Defender of leukemia increasing EMF and dioxin etc.
Mark Probert - 30 Oct 2004 16:23 GMT
"Ilena Rose" <ilena@san.rr.com> in her officious capacity as the Dominatrix
of the Humantic Foundation, a delicensed and apparently defunct group that
she personally reduced tofit inside a 4"X4" mail drop box, wrote in message
news:pmb7o0pdur846j330u9de5lofbfll25iu4@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 15:02:59 GMT, "Mark Probert" <Mark
> Probert@lumbercartel.com>
>
> www.humanticsfoundation.com/PropagandistProbert.html
> Defender of leukemia increasing EMF and dioxin etc.
Can you actually PROVE that I am a defender of these things?
No, you cannot, unless you lie, twist, and refuse to answer. (Of course,
Ilena wil lGoogle like mad and find that I said the dioxin was not the
intended active ingredient in AO, but a contaminant. She will then twist
this to say I was defending its use. She will not, however, acknowledge that
I was exposed to it and have soundly criticized the handling of the AO
cases.)
I fully expect her to not answer, but to repeat the her that she has said
about me for all these years.
She is truly intellectually bankrupt and not in touch with reality.
Ilena Rose - 30 Oct 2004 16:12 GMT
>It is never a good idea to rely solely on news articles for your
>information.
It is a far worse idea to depend on those who make their living
(junkscience.com/acsh/ and their quacky front groups) from being paid
by those who benefit from their corporate science.
Mark Probert - 30 Oct 2004 16:27 GMT
"Ilena Rose" <ilena@san.rr.com> in her officious capacity as the Dominatrix
of the Humantic Foundation, a delicensed and apparently defunct group that
she personally reduced tofit inside a 4"X4" mail drop box, wrote in message
news:5qb7o0lislokv0t0p7aficlcieilr427r9@4ax.com...
> >It is never a good idea to rely solely on news articles for your
> >information.
>
> It is a far worse idea to depend on those who make their living
> (junkscience.com/acsh/ and their quacky front groups) from being paid
> by those who benefit from their corporate science.
Since you have accused me of this several times, I would love for you to let
me know where I can sign up for this largesse. I would love to be able to
afford to take the family on a cruise this winter, and I heard from you that
Central America is a nice place to visit. I could even get to visit my
friend Ivan, who is recently retired and lives in one of the countries
there.
So, be a dear, and send me the sign up info.
Huge - 30 Oct 2004 17:50 GMT
>>It is never a good idea to rely solely on news articles for your
>>information.
>
>It is a far worse idea to depend on those who make their living
>(junkscience.com/acsh/ and their quacky front groups) from being paid
>by those who benefit from their corporate science.
And the worst idea of all to rely on usenet for anything even remotely
approaching rationality.

Signature
"The road to Paradise is through Intercourse."
[email me at huge [at] huge [dot] org [dot] uk]
Mark Probert - 30 Oct 2004 21:20 GMT
> >>It is never a good idea to rely solely on news articles for your
> >>information.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> And the worst idea of all to rely on usenet for anything even remotely
> approaching rationality.
You are absolutely correct and Ilena proves that every day.
Gymmy Bob - 30 Oct 2004 17:05 GMT
"doubles" "slightly higher chance"
Is this reporter or the scientists the idiot?
> http://www.healthsentinel.com/news.php?event=news_print_list_item&id63
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> a slightly higher chance of children living within 100 metres of a
> high-tension overhead cable developing the disease.
Huge - 30 Oct 2004 17:51 GMT
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
Please don't post HTML to Usenet.

Signature
"The road to Paradise is through Intercourse."
[email me at huge [at] huge [dot] org [dot] uk]
Gymmy Bob - 31 Oct 2004 03:54 GMT
Get a better news reader.
> >This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
> Please don't post HTML to Usenet.
Huge - 31 Oct 2004 12:11 GMT
>> [email me at huge [at] huge [dot] org [dot] uk]
>> "The road to Paradise is through Intercourse."
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Get a better news reader.
Translation: "I am a selfish c.nt who doesn't give a toss about
anyone else".
Or indeed want to be read by anyone.
*plonk*

Signature
"The road to Paradise is through Intercourse."
[email me at huge [at] huge [dot] org [dot] uk]
Mark Probert - 31 Oct 2004 16:51 GMT
> >> [email me at huge [at] huge [dot] org [dot] uk]
> >> "The road to Paradise is through Intercourse."
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Translation: "I am a selfish c.nt
Please use the proper acronym....*C*annot *U*nderstand *N*ormal *T*hinking.
Otherwise, your description of Gymmy bOOb is right on.
who doesn't give a toss about
> anyone else".
>
> Or indeed want to be read by anyone.
>
> *plonk*
Gymmy Bob - 31 Oct 2004 22:58 GMT
Sorry I don't read long bottom posts from ignoranmuses that don't care if
anybody else reads them.
> >> [email me at huge [at] huge [dot] org [dot] uk]
> >> "The road to Paradise is through Intercourse."
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> *plonk*