 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / General / Alternative / October 2004The germ theory vs the soil theory
Soil Theory vs Germ Theory - 150 years of suppression From my own experience I have discovered that the soil theory is valid. Soil theory maintains that GERMS, FUNGII and PARASITES only thrive in a toxic body - and the root cause of all disease is CELLULAR TOXEMIA. "The germ theory proposes you get rid of the flies, while it makes more sense to clean up the garbage attracting them." --Bill Nelson, developer of the QXCI machine "If I could live my life over again, I would devote it to proving that germs seek their natural habitat, diseased tissue - rather than being the cause of the diseased tissue." -- Rudolph Virchow (1821-1902) "Bernard was right, the germ is nothing--the milieu [the environment within] is everything." - Louis Pasteur (on his deathbed) "Many forms of diagnosis are dependent upon what germ life exists, and its existence in the body usually indicates a bad state of deterioration. Disease germs are nature's undertakers" - -- Bernard Jenson, The Science and Practise of Iridology "... depending on its inner state, germs arose within the body itself that, in Rife’s opinion, were not the cause but the result of disease states." --150 Years of Suppression, by Christopher Bird 1991 Carole http://www.austarmetro.com.au/~hubbca/soil.htm > Soil Theory vs Germ Theory - 150 years of suppression > [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > Carole > http://www.austarmetro.com.au/~hubbca/soil.htm For every (sometimes questionable) quote you posted above, there are studies, scientists, & health care providers who've shown them to be wrong. Your own crappy health experiences suggest you need to look in a different direction. > For every (sometimes questionable) quote you posted above, there are > studies, scientists, & health care providers who've shown them to be > wrong. Of course. There are "experts" and "reliable sources", studies and all sorts of evidence to prove them I'm wrong. Ever heard of propaganda and suppressed stories? For example, there is the complete control of archaeological history which is a story of coverups and suppression. There are all sorts of things the government/ world controllers don't want us to know anything about. http://www.archaeologyanswers.com/ http://www.nexusmagazine.com/articles/arcoverups.html Every aspect of our lives is controlled with cooked up spurious text books, history and coverups. So what's new? The trick is to think for yourself and not take the establishment line as gospel. (Actually, I don't even take the gospel as gospel.) > Your own crappy health experiences suggest you need to look in a > different direction. My own "crappy" experience are empiracal evidence, that pseudo science is correct. In other words, our whole world experience has been subverted and replaced with teachings that don't make sense. This will need to change, because man will not evolve spiritually until the real laws that govern reality are acknowledged. This is called truth as opposed to "establishment stand on an issue". Carole http://www.austarmetro.com.au/~hubbca/conspiracy.htm Nothing would be what it is, Because everything would be what it isn’t. And contrary-wise: what it is, it wouldn’t be. And what it wouldn’t be, it would. You see? -- Alice’s Adventures In Wonderland, 1865, Lewis Carroll, English writer and mathematician, > > For every (sometimes questionable) quote you posted above, there are > > studies, scientists, & health care providers who've shown them to be [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > -- Alice’s Adventures In Wonderland, 1865, Lewis Carroll, > English writer and mathematician, The above proves that everything I've ever said about you is true. You make it easy, Carole. >"Bernard was right, the germ is nothing--the milieu >[the environment within] is everything." >- Louis Pasteur (on his deathbed) It just won't go away, will it? http://www.acahf.org.au/articles/pasteur.htm  SignaturePeter Bowditch The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com This isn't the original article to which the quote was attributed ! Anth >>"Bernard was right, the germ is nothing--the milieu >>[the environment within] is everything." [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > http://www.acahf.org.au/articles/pasteur.htm >>>"Bernard was right, the germ is nothing--the milieu >>>[the environment within] is everything." [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >> >> http://www.acahf.org.au/articles/pasteur.htm >This isn't the original article to which the quote was attributed ! The quote is never attributed. This article debunks the original "quote". It never happened. SignaturePeter Bowditch The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com (According to you which fits your model) Anth >"Bernard was right, the germ is nothing--the milieu?? >[the environment within]?is everything."?? >- Louis Pasteur (on his deathbed) You should drop by more often, Carole -- this quotation is as phoney as a false leg. -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT) > >"Bernard was right, the germ is nothing--the milieu > >[the environment within] is everything." > >- Louis Pasteur (on his deathbed) > > You should drop by more often, Carole -- this quotation is as phoney > as a false leg. Yes, I do miss this place here and there. Most, if not all, the people I deal with (those closest to me) tend to avoid dealing with issues and respond emotionally if pushed on certain topics. So the internet is the only place where a person can get information and feedback on issues. I used to be called argumentative as a child which used to annoy people. I get equally frustrated when people avoid dealing with issues - but that's life. I actually think the soil theory is correct. I believe that if people didn't have any deficiencies, they wouldn't have health problems. Certain things rob the body of minerals e.g., acid causing foods (meat, sugar etc), chemicals and heavy metals which the body uses up resources to eliminate. I haven't got an overactive imagination and it is a fact that there is a conspiracy behind every facet of our lives. You give me a topic and I'll tell you the conspiracy - archaelogy, history, money, religion, government, health etc. Carole http://www.austarmetro.com.au/~hubbca/conspiracy.htm Carole http:// > -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net > These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. > "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants > were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT) >I haven't got an overactive imagination and it is a fact that there is >a conspiracy behind every facet of our lives. You give me a topic and >I'll tell you the conspiracy - archaelogy, history, money, religion, >government, health etc. No, you'll tell us there *is* a conspiracy. You won't prove it, and any contrary evidence you'll ignore. -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT) > You give me a topic and > I'll tell you the conspiracy - archaelogy, history, money, religion, > government, health etc. What a sad paranoid world you live in. > > You give me a topic and > > I'll tell you the conspiracy - archaelogy, history, money, religion, > > government, health etc. > > What a sad paranoid world you live in. Suddenly, her binge drinking makes sense....... >Subject: Re: The germ theory vs the soil theory >From: "M,a,r,k P,r,o,b,e,r,t-September 24, 2004" M,a,r,kP,r,o,b,e,r,t >09-24-04@lambercartel.com >Date: 9/24/04 7:28 AM Pacific Daylight Time >Message-id: >> You give me a topic and >> I'll tell you the conspiracy - archaelogy, history, money, religion, >> government, health etc. > >What a sad paranoid world you live in. Not quite. We all live in it. The Americans were given a Republic. Now they have a democracy. Not even nearly the same thing. The American money was once backed by gold and silver. Today it is backed by a promise from a private corporation, the Federal reserve bank. You know, an I O U of a type. The American medical system is based upon a medical fruad. That is that germs cause disease. The results are very profitable, yet none the less laughable. DrC PhD > >Subject: Re: The germ theory vs the soil theory > >From: "M,a,r,k P,r,o,b,e,r,t-September 24, 2004" M,a,r,kP,r,o,b,e,r,t [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Not quite. We all live in it. Well, at least Carole has you for company. That makes me feel better. > The Americans were given a Republic. Now they have a democracy. Not even > nearly the same thing. Actually, we do not have a democracy in the truest sense of the idea. At best, we have a representative democracy. > The American money was once backed by gold and silver. Today it is backed by a > promise from a private corporation, the Federal reserve bank. You know, an I O > U of a type. So? This point is as old as some of Jan's citations. > The American medical system is based upon a medical fruad. That is that germs > cause disease. The results are very profitable, yet none the less laughable. Non-sequitur. None of the above points are relevant to your bullshit claim. > > The Americans were given a Republic. Now they have a democracy. Not even > > nearly the same thing. [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Non-sequitur. None of the above points are relevant to your bullshit claim. Ever occur to you that you are one mind controlled dude? Conspiracies do exist and if a person can't even acknowledge the possibility, they have a problem. Carole http://www.austarmetro.com.au/~hubbca/conspiracy.htm "Most people have built in 'slides' that short circuit the mind’s critical examination process when it comes to certain sensitive topics. 'Slides' is a CIA term for a conditioned type of response which dead-ends a person’s thinking, and terminates debate or examination of the topic. For example, the mention of the word 'conspiracy' usually solicits a slide response with many people." --Fritz Springmeier, author of The Top 13 Illuminati Bloodlines and de-programmer http://www.newworldpeace.com/911menu3.html > "M,a,r,k P,r,o,b,e,r,t-September 27, 2004" <M,a,r,k P,r,o,b,e,r,t 09-27-04@lambercartel.com> wrote in message news:<h9W5d.5542$NS1.2476644@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>... > > > The Americans were given a Republic. Now they have a democracy. Not even > > > nearly the same thing. [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > do exist and if a person can't even acknowledge the possibility, they > have a problem. Oh, you mean like the Conspiracies to Undermine Rational Thought? Are you the leader? "M*a*r*k P*r*o*b*e*r*t-October 7, 2004" <M*a*r*k P*r*o*b*e*r*t 10-7-04@lambercartel.com> wrote in message news:<HTi9d.20402 > > > Non-sequitur. None of the above points are relevant to your bullshit > claim. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Oh, you mean like the Conspiracies to Undermine Rational Thought? Are you > the leader? No thats your job. I don't claim that any of my conspiracy ideas are conclusive, but they sure can't be knocked out of the equation either. But people like you just assume that the conspiracy ideas have absolutely no footing, but the status quo, the established science is sacred, that "experts" are all right and shouldn't be questioned because they have a string of letters after their names. Sorry dude, I'm here to say I disagree and that these "experts" are illuminati dupes, put in place to uphold perverted science and are happy to do it because they get paid big bucks and get lots of prestige and that's all they care about. Carole http://www.austarmetro.com.au/~hubbca/rationality.htm > "M*a*r*k P*r*o*b*e*r*t-October 7, 2004" <M*a*r*k P*r*o*b*e*r*t 10-7-04@lambercartel.com> wrote in message news:<HTi9d.20402 > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > No thats your job. Sorry, Toots, but I was told by this guy under a rock, that you are the chief. > I don't claim that any of my conspiracy ideas are conclusive, but they > sure can't be knocked out of the equation either. Sure they can. But people like you > just assume that the conspiracy ideas have absolutely no footing, but > the status quo, the established science is sacred, that "experts" are > all right and shouldn't be questioned because they have a string of > letters after their names. Now, Carole, why would you say that? Oh, that's right, because you cannot prove any of your whacko conspiracies. > Sorry dude, I'm here to say I disagree and that these "experts" are > illuminati dupes, put in place to uphold perverted science and are > happy to do it because they get paid big bucks and get lots of > prestige and that's all they care about. Well, I am put here to say that you are a french fry short of a happy meal. > Carole > http://www.austarmetro.com.au/~hubbca/rationality.htm |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.