+- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> -+
> In message <0b7051c6-e54c-4881-94f9-b0ded9934...@x25g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, trigonometry1...@gmail.com | wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> | chance that someone will see the light. |
> +- D. C. Sessions <d...@lumbercartel.com> -+
If going to Mars is to be at least semi-sensible
thing, it is going to take good shielding. The
aluminium can spacecraft of the Apollo era
maybe passable as a means of get the various
national nauts to the moon but beyond that
it is impractical. Which is why I mention
nuclear power and space propulsion.
And yes what you say is true. It was part
of lecture "back in the day."
trigonometry1972@gmail.com | - 08 Nov 2009 14:17 GMT
On Nov 7, 5:50 am, "trigonometry1...@gmail.com |"
<trigonometry1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > In message <0b7051c6-e54c-4881-94f9-b0ded9934...@x25g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, trigonometry1...@gmail.com | wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> And yes what you say is true. It was part
> of lecture "back in the day."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_threat_from_cosmic_rays
The links do a nice job.
D. C. Sessions - 18 Nov 2009 12:25 GMT
> If going to Mars is to be at least semi-sensible
> thing, it is going to take good shielding.
And I propose to you that carrying around more than
14 pounds per square inch of shielding isn't going
to happen.
| The brighter the stupid burns, the more |
| chance that someone will see the light. |
+- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> -+