Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Alternative / November 2009

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

bacteria may limit space travel

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
trigonometry1972@gmail.com | - 03 Nov 2009 14:09 GMT
http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Study_Bacteria_may_limit_space_travel_999.html

Lack of UV, chronic hard radiation exposure, and
lack gravity, I suppose could impair immune response.
For successful deep space flight, there should be
much more radiation shielding for both passengers
and their food. Faster nuclear drives would also
help. But then again with the current "recession"
such thoughts apply to a rather distant future if
ever.

Trig
Mark Probert - 03 Nov 2009 15:31 GMT
On Nov 3, 9:09 am, "trigonometry1...@gmail.com |"
<trigonometry1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Study_Bacteria_may_limit_space_trav...
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> such thoughts apply to a rather distant future if
> ever.

Russians are discussing a nuke drive. Check Yahoo News.
D. C. Sessions - 06 Nov 2009 03:30 GMT
> For successful deep space flight, there should be
> much more radiation shielding for both passengers
> and their food.

Barring vastly more shielding than a spacecraft weight
budget allows, shielding is actually counterproductive
thanks to shifting the energy of radiation down to
where human tissues absorb more of it.

| The brighter the stupid burns, the more |
| chance that someone will see the light. |
+- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> -+
trigonometry1972@gmail.com | - 07 Nov 2009 13:50 GMT
> In message <0b7051c6-e54c-4881-94f9-b0ded9934...@x25g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, trigonometry1...@gmail.com | wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> | chance that someone will see the light. |
> +- D. C. Sessions <d...@lumbercartel.com> -+

If going to Mars is to be at least semi-sensible
thing, it is going to take good shielding. The
aluminium can spacecraft of the Apollo era
maybe passable as a means of get the various
national nauts to the moon but beyond that
it is impractical. Which is why I mention
nuclear power and space propulsion.

And yes what you say is true. It was part
of lecture "back in the day."
trigonometry1972@gmail.com | - 08 Nov 2009 14:17 GMT
On Nov 7, 5:50 am, "trigonometry1...@gmail.com |"
<trigonometry1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > In message <0b7051c6-e54c-4881-94f9-b0ded9934...@x25g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, trigonometry1...@gmail.com | wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> And yes what you say is true. It was part
> of lecture "back in the day."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_threat_from_cosmic_rays

The links do a nice job.
D. C. Sessions - 18 Nov 2009 12:25 GMT
> If going to Mars is to be at least semi-sensible
> thing, it is going to take good shielding.

And I propose to you that carrying around more than
14 pounds per square inch of shielding isn't going
to happen.

| The brighter the stupid burns, the more |
| chance that someone will see the light. |
+- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> -+
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.