Are Populations Being Primed For Nano-Microchips Inside Vaccines?

http://preventdisease.com/news/09/100509_injectable_nano_microchips.shtml

2009

It's almost surreal, like something out of a sci-fi flick, but
nano-microchips invisible to the naked eye are a reality that are already
being hosted in wide-range of applications. The question is, how long will
it take governments and big pharma to immerse nano-microchips inside of
vaccines to tag and surveil global populations?

Nanotechnology deals with structures smaller than one micrometer (less than
1/30th the width of a human hair), and involves developing materials or
devices within that size. To put the size of a nanometer in perspective, it
is 100,000 times smaller than the width of a human hair.

More than ten years ago, simple low-cost techniques improved the design and
manufacture of nano-microchips. That unlocked a multitude of methodologies
for their manufacture in a wide-range of applications including optical,
biological, and electronic devices.

The joint use of nanoelectronics, photolithography, and new biomaterials,
have enabled the required manufacturing technology towards nanorobots for
common medical applications, such as surgical instrumentation, diagnosis and
drug delivery.

Japan's Hitachi says it has developed the world's smallest and thinnest
microchip, that can be embedded in paper to track down parcels or prove the
authenticity of a document. The integrated circuit (IC) chip is as minute as
a speck of dust.

Nanoelectrodes implanted in the brain are increasingly being used to manage
neurological disorders. Mohammad Reza Abidian, a post-doctoral researcher at
the U-M Department of Biomedical Engineering said that polymers in nanotubes
"are biocompatible and have both electronic and ionic conductivity." He
further stated "therefore, these materials are good candidates for
biomedical applications such as neural interfaces, biosensors and drug
delivery systems."

Depending on the objectives of such studies, research could theoretically
pave the way for smart recording electrodes that can deliver drugs to
positively or negatively affect the immune response.

Through nanotechnology, researchers have also been able to create artificial
pores able to transmit nanoscale materials through membranes.

A UC biomedical engineering study appearing in the journal Nature
Nanotechnology, Sept. 27, 2009, successfully inserted the modified core of a
nanomotor, a microscopic biological machine, into a lipid membrane. The
resulting channel enabled them to move both single- and double-stranded DNA
through the membrane.

Professor Peixuan Guo who led the study said past work with biological
channels has been focused on channels large enough to move only
single-stranded genetic material.

"Since the genomic DNA of human, animals, plants, fungus and bacteria are
double stranded, the development of single pore system that can sequence
double-stranded DNA is very important," he says.

Such engineered channels could have applications in nano-sensing, DNA
sequencing, drug loading, including innovative techniques to implement DNA
packaging mechanisms of viral nanomotors and vaccine delivery.

"The idea that a DNA molecule travels through the nanopore, advancing
nucleotide by nucleotide, could lead to the development of a single pore DNA
sequencing apparatus, an area of strong national interest," Guo said.

Scientists working at Queen Mary, University of London, have developed
micrometer-sized capsules to safely deliver drugs inside living cells. These
"micro shuttles" could hypothetically be loaded with a specific microchip
controlling the dose of medication to be opened remotely, releasing their
contents. Besides monitoring the dosage, the same microchip could be used to
surveil the patient in conjunction with various tracking systems.

Scientists in the United Kingdom have recently reported advances towards
overcoming key challenges in nanotechnology. They demonstrated how
nanoparticles could move quickly in a desired direction without help from
outside forces. Their achievement has broad implications, the scientists
say, raising the possibility of coaxing cells to move and grow in specific
directions.

Doug Dorst, a microbiologist and vaccine critic in South Wales, says these
advances have an immense appeal to vaccine makers. "Biotech companies and
their researchers have quickly moved most funding initiatives towards
nanotechnology to increase the potency of their vaccines," he said. If
microorganisms inside of vaccines can be coaxed into targeting or invading
specific cells, they could achieve their goal at an accelerated rate over
conventional vaccines. "Depending on which side of the vaccine debate you're
on, whether pro or con, nanobots inside vaccine preparations could advance
their effectiveness exponentially by either dramatically improving or
destroying immunity depending on their design," he added.

Dorst claims that present day nanobot technology could just as easily be
used to advance biological weapons as they can to advance human health. "For
every fear that biotech propaganda proliferates about deadly diseases and
how vaccines prevent them, it is one more lie to incrementally convince the
masses that vaccines are effective."

The worry for Dorst is that one day vaccines "will do what they've always
been intended for...control of the global populace."

Nanoemulsion platforms are already capable of developing vaccines from very
diverse materials. Mixtures of soybean oil, alcohol, water and detergents
can be emulsified into ultra-small particles smaller than 400 nanometers
wide (about 1/200th the width of a human hair). These could be combined with
any number of nano-microchips with all or part of disease-causing microbes
to trigger the body's immune system.

In 2007 researchers at the Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL)
announced in an article in the journal, Nature Biotechnology, that they had
developed a "nanoparticle that can deliver vaccines more effectively, with
fewer side effects, and at a fraction of the cost of current vaccine
technologies." The article went on to describe the effects of their
breakthrough: "At a mere 25 nanometers, these particles are so tiny that
once injected, they flow through the skin's extracellular matrix, making a
beeline to the lymph nodes. Within minutes, they've reached a concentration
of DCs thousands of times greater than in the skin."

Russia has recently announced a new manufacturing plant that will strictly
produce nano-vaccines. Project plans include development of two vaccines for
human flu and bird flu and three biopharmaceuticals for boosting the immune
system and increasing the efficiency of antibacterial and antiviral drugs,
among other initiatives.

The human body is very resistant to nanoparticles that attempt to invade
human cells. Scientists are intensely investigating methods to disrupt human
enzymes that may degrade nanoparticles. Experts at the University of
Liverpool found a way around this obstacle that could mean more efficient,
topical drugs in the future, which could act a whole lot faster than the
ones currently in use.

All these nanotechnological advances raise many issues and concerns about
the toxicity and environmental impact of nanomaterials, and their potential
effects on medicine, global economics, as well as speculation about
government surveillance. These concerns have led to a debate among advocacy
groups and governments on whether special regulation of nanotechnology is
warranted.

The Environmental Protection Agency issued a news release last week saying
that it had "today outlined a new research strategy to better understand how
manufactured nanomaterials may harm human health and the environment."
Interesting as that strategy document is, it was hardly hot off the presses.

Indeed, many companies advertise their use of such
billionth-of-a-meter-scale constituents as a measure of a product's
state-of-the-art status, implying that ultra-small ingredients are an
inherently good thing. They aren't. Nor does size necessarily make these
materials worse than others. At this point it's just maddeningly
unpredictable what nano things will do.

Proponents of nanotechnology are very critical of regulatory measures that
may impeed its progression. Many of these critics have staunchly dismissed
concerns as being fear-hyped conspiracy theories based on science fiction.

In the popular video game series Metal Gear Solid, many characters and
soldiers in general, have "nanomachines" in their bloodstream, and are used
to block pain, allow members of fire teams/patrols to share sensory
information, heal bodily damage, as well as manipulating viruses central to
video game's plot line.

Through the use of special effects and computer-generated imagery, several
blockbusters starring Keanu Reeves including The Matrix Trilogy and The Day
the Earth Stood Still, have dramatized how nanobots could effectively take
control of their organic and inorganic targets.

Star Trek episodes and their theatrical releases such as Star Trek: First
Contact have also depicted how nanoprobes (nanites) could infect an
individual's bloodstream through a pair of tubules.

Regardless of the recurring themes of nanobots in video games, sci-fi shows
and movies, nanotechnology is a reality, and nano-microchips are well on
their way to being utilized in ways which may be detrimental to human health
and freedom on a global scale.

The development of nano-microchips are a major thrust of governments and
pharmaceutical industries who want the ultimate power and leverage over
global populations for more profit and more control.

In December 2000, Former Chief Medical Officer of Finland, Rauni-Leena
Luukanen-Kilde, MD stated that it is technically possible for every newborn
to be injected with a microchip, which could then function to identify the
person for the rest of his or her life. Such plans are secretly being
discussed in the U.S. without any public airing of the privacy issues
involved.

Today's microchips operate by means of low-frequency radio waves that target
them. With the help of satellites, the implanted person can be tracked
anywhere on the globe. Such a technique was among a number tested in the
Iraq war, according to Dr. Carl Sanders, who invented the
intelligence-manned interface (IMI) biotic, which is injected into people.
(Earlier during the Vietnam War, soldiers were injected with the Rambo chip,
designed to increase adrenaline flow into the bloodstream.) The
20-billion-bit/second supercomputers at the U.S. National Security Agency
(NSA) could now "see and hear" what soldiers experience in the battlefield
with a remote monitoring system (RMS).

When a 5-micromillimeter microchip (the diameter of a strand of hair is 50
micromillimeters) is placed into optical nerve of the eye, it draws
neuroimpulses from the brain that embody the experiences, smells, sights,
and voice of the implanted person. Once transferred and stored in a
computer, these neuroimpulses can be projected back to the person's brain
via the microchip to be reexperienced. Using a RMS, a land-based computer
operator can send electromagnetic messages (encoded as signals) to the
nervous system, affecting the target's performance. With RMS, healthy
persons can be induced to see hallucinations and to hear voices in their
heads.

Every thought, reaction, hearing, and visual observation causes a certain
neurological potential, spikes, and patterns in the brain and its
electromagnetic fields, which can now be decoded into thoughts, pictures,
and voices. Electromagnetic stimulation can therefore change a person's
brainwaves and affect muscular activity, causing painful muscular cramps
experienced as torture.

The NSA's electronic surveillance system can simultaneously follow and
handle millions of people. Each of us has a unique bioelectrical resonance
frequency in the brain, just as we have unique fingerprints. With
electromagnetic frequency (EMF) brain stimulation fully coded, pulsating
electromagnetic signals can be sent to the brain, causing the desired voice
and visual effects to be experienced by the target. This is a form of
electronic warfare. U.S. astronauts were implanted before they were sent
into space so their thoughts could be followed and all their emotions could
be registered 24 hours a day.

The mass media has not reported that an implanted person's privacy vanishes
for the rest of his or her life. S/he can be manipulated in many ways. Using
different frequencies, the secret controller of this equipment can even
change a person's emotional life. S/he can be made aggressive or lethargic.
Sexuality can be artificially influenced. Thought signals and subconscious
thinking can be read, dreams affected and even induced, all without the
knowledge or consent of the implanted person.

This secret technology has been used by military forces in certain NATO
countries since the 1980s without civilian and academic populations having
heard anything about it. Thus, little information about such invasive
mind-control systems is available in professional and academic journals.

The NSA's Signals Intelligence group can remotely monitor information from
human brains by decoding the evoked potentials (3.50HZ, 5 milliwatt) emitted
by the brain. Prisoner experimentees in both Gothenburg, Sweden and Vienna,
Austria have been found to have evident brain lesions. Diminished blood
circulation and lack of oxygen in the right temporal frontal lobes result
where brain implants are usually operative. A Finnish experimentee
experienced brain atrophy and intermittent attacks of unconsciousness due to
lack of oxygen.

Targeting people's brain functions with electromagnetic fields and beams
(from helicopters and airplanes, satellites, from parked vans, neighboring
houses, telephone poles, electrical appliances, mobile phones, TV, radio,
etc.) is part of the radiation problem that should be addressed by
democratically elected governments. However, there is currently no interest
by any national government to seriously address this issue.

The timeline for integrating nano-microchips inside of vaccines is
speculative. It could be just a few years, months or perhaps it is here and
we already unaware of their integration within pharmaceuticals. Regardless,
due to the many military and political advantages, their implementation is
inevitable.

However fraudulent, it was an imperative for world powers and pharmaceutical
cartels to promote the effectiveness of vaccinations and enact national
pandemic preparedness policies which mandate vaccinations.

In 2005 the World Health Organization (WHO) developed international health
regulations that would bind all 194 member countries to pandemic emergency
guidelines which could enforce such a mandate. Without these procedures of
public health (and propagandized vaccine campaigns) in place, there would be
little or no voluntary cooperation from the public to roll up their sleeves
and accept the inoculations. Public participation is an essential tool that
will soon allow big pharma to inject the most effective surveillence tool
ever designed into billions of people.

Although nanotechnology manufacturing is currently available on a global
scale, before biotech companies are able to initiate mass production and
testing of nano-microchips inside of vaccines, they will likely sell the
idea to the public. Through various "health enhancement scenarios" they will
encourage participation and publicly announce regulatory approval from the
same policies and regulatory agencies they helped create.

By mid-summer of 2009, the WHO and the Center of Disease Control (CDC)
effectively hyped a false flu pandemic and convinced the world to submit to
H1N1 vaccines. Additional doses of propaganda and possibly a biological
event, may equally convince populations to knowingly accept microchips
inside of vaccines under the guise of a "greater good" for humanity.

When our brain functions are already connected to supercomputers by means of
radio implants and microchips, it will be too late for protest. This threat
can be defeated only by educating the public, using available literature on
biotelemetry, nanorobotics and information exchanged at international
congresses.

The time to act is now!