Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Alternative / October 2009

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

[2009 Aug] What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations? by Dr. Anders Bruun Laursen

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
john - 27 Aug 2009 19:55 GMT
What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations?

by Dr. Anders Bruun Laursen
.
Global Research, August 20, 2009
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=14851

There seems to be quite a lot of uncertainty about the technical nature of
Swine Flu (H1N1) vaccines.

As a medical doctor, I wish to clarify a number of improtant issues: First,
we should talk about vaccines instead of vaccine, since the vaccines vary as
for their compositions and even their ways of being dispensed: some by
injection, another by the nose.

I think the fears as for the vaccines can be referred to:

1. the adjuvants - in particular squalene which was in all probability
responsible for the Gulf War syndrome,

2. the virus antigen´s condition (dead, attenuated, live)

3. a deeply rooted mistrust in our politicians and the vaccine producers´
motives and morals: e.g. Baxter´s live bird flu virus last Winter (12), the
Bayer AIDS haemophiliac product scandal (15).

First it is necessary to understand, that pandemic vaccines are made
according to two procedures:

1. The Developement of a totally new vaccine from scratch. This takes more
time, administration and testing than mock up vaccines (see below).

2. A Mock-up vaccine is a vaccine with all the adjuvants of the pandemic
vaccine - but without the killed or attenuated pandemic virus. (1) This
virus is - until the pandemic virus is known - a different, attenuated known
potentially pandemic virus, in the case of the Pandemrix vaccine for the EU
it is an attenuated H5N1 bird flu virus. This is the mock-up vaccine. When
the nature of the pandemic swine flu virus (H1N1) is known, it replaces the
H5N1 virus in an attenuated form, the adjuvants being left unchanged.

Until now mock-up vaccine test-vaccinations have been going on on
voluntary "human guinea pigs." Since most of the contents of the vaccine has
already been approved, the approval of the pandemic vaccine is easier to
implement.

After the exchange of virus in the vaccine, the company will have to apply
for a "variation". However, this is just a matter of form, since such a
variation approval is given by the EU within 5 days - which means that there
is no objective testing of the vaccine requiring official approval. The
safety is entirely left to the vaccine producer, who has been granted
immunity to actions of damages due to expected side effects (2).

So, as you see, there is no confusion with regard to swine flu and bird flu
viruses. But there is another important consideration: the role of squalene.

The average quantity of squalene injected into the US soldiers abroad and at
home in the anthrax vaccine during and after the Gulf War was 34.2
micrograms per billion micrograms of water. According to one study, this was
the cause of the Gulf War syndrome in 25% of 697.000 US personnel at home
and abroad. (3). You can find this table of FDA analyses from the Gulf War
lots on The Military Vaccine Resource Directory website (4)

a.. AVA 020 - 11 ppb squalene (parts per billion)
> b.. AVA 030 - 10 ppb squalene
> c.. AVA 038 - 27 ppb squalene
> d.. AVA 043 - 40 ppb squalene
> e.. AVA 047 - 83 ppb squalene

These values were confirmed by Prof. R. F. Garry (5) before the House of
Representatives. Prof Garry was the man to discover the connection between
the Gulf War syndrome and squalene.

According to his findings, the Gulf War syndrome was caused by squalene,
which was banned by a Federal Court Judge in 2004 from the Pentagon´s use.
(6)

As seen on p. 6 of this EMEA document (7), the Pandremix vaccine contains
10,68 mg of squalene per 0,5 ml. This corresponds to 2.136.0000 microgrammes
pr. billion microgrammes of water, i.e. one million times more squalene per
dose than in (4). There is any reason to believe that this will make people
sick to a much higher extent than in 1990/91. This appears murderous to me.

I have contacted the Danish National Health Service: They are to decree mass
vaccinations in Denmark - and yet they knew nothing about the composition of
the Pandremix vaccine.

Then I addressed the Danish Medicinal Agency. They admitted that the
Pandremix vaccine from GlaxoSmithKline does contain squalene and thimerosal.
They have not rejected my remark that the squalene concentration is
dangerous. In contrast, the AstraZeneca MedImmune nasal vaccination (8)
avoids squalene side effects.

So far the use of squalene has been banned by the FDA in the US according to
Der Spiegel (9). However, this may not last long (10).

"Clearly bypassing the FDA requirements for safety testing of these new
adjuvants and the vaccines which contain them puts the entire population at
risk for serious, possibly life threatening side effects, particularly any
of the 12,000 paid trial participants (6,000 children) who are unfortunate
enough to be randomized into the adjuvant containing groups."

Still, on July 23, 2009, the FDA announced, "Currently, no U.S. licensed
vaccine contains the adjuvants MF-59 or ASO3 (squalene). It is expected that
a novel influenza A (H1N1) vaccine manufactured using the same process as
U.S. licensed seasonal inactivated influenza vaccine but administered with
MF-59 or ASO3 will be authorized for emergency use only."

Furthermore, "Two of the manufacturers (Novartis and GSK) have proprietary
oil-in-water adjuvants (MF-59 and ASO3, respectively) which have been
evaluated in a number of clinical studies including studies with influenza
vaccines. These manufacturers will include an evaluation of the utility of
the adjuvant for dose sparing and higher effect in their clinical studies."

"The same document indicates that vaccines containing the un-approved
adjuvants will be given to 100 children 6 months to 3 years old, 100
children 3 years old to 8 years, 100 individuals 18 to 64 years old and 100
individuals 65 and older in each of the multiple clinical trials. In
addition, 700 individuals in each trial will be given non-adjuvanted
vaccine".

Now for the immunological side effects of squalene to occur takes months to
years - and cannot be evaluated after up to 6 weeks of observation. Der
Spiegel (9) calls the mass vaccinations on Europeans a gigantic cost free
experiment to provide the FDA with mass vaccination experience to clear the
track for sale in the US.

EMEA admits that side effects can only be found through extensive
vaccination campaigns! (1).

Here is what EMEA (4) has to say about risks of GSK Pandemrix:

EMEAs Pandemrix is commonly or very commonly associated with a range of
local and systemic adverse reactions but these are not often of severe
intensity and the safety profile would not preclude the use of the vaccine
in healthy adults aged 18-60 years or > 60 years.

However, there are some adverse reactions known to be very rarely associated
with influenza vaccines and it is currently not possible to predict if
higher rates might be observed with Pandemrix compared with, for example,
seasonal influenza vaccines.

Dr Keiji Fukuda, the WHO's flu chief, today warned about the potential
dangers of the untested vaccine (11): "There are certain areas where you
simply do not try to make any economies. One of the things which cannot be
compromised is the safety of vaccines."

Which is exactly what is going on!

What I do not know is, if they are going to leave the attenuated (or live -
Baxter (12)) bird flu vaccine - or to totally replace it by the H1N1 virus.

Other severe, but rare side effects are autism in children due to thimerosal
(13) and the Guillan-Barré syndrome seen with 400-500 Americans after the
1976 unnecessary mass vaccinations against swine flu (14) - videos. As for
additional severe side effects of squalene - see Stephen Lendman (15).

My advice: If you are forced to be vaccinated against the harmless swine flu
(H1N1) - demand a vaccination with the AstraZeneca nasal vaccine MedImmune
(8)- thereby avoiding squalene side effects.

References
(1) EMEA
http://www.emea.europa.eu/pdfs/human/pandemicinfluenza/PandemicVaccines_Q&A_4614
7609en.pdf

(2) Global Research 20 July
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=14453
(3 Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_War_syndrome
(4) The Military Vaccine Resource Directory
http://www.mvrd.org/showpage.cfm?ID=69 .
(5) Statement for Hearing Record, The House Subcommittee on National
Security, Veterans Affairs, and International Relations
http://www.autoimmune.com/SubcommitteeRFGarry24Jan02.html
(6)  Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_War_syndrome
(7) EMEA
http://www.emea.europa.eu/humandocs/PDFs/EPAR/pandemrix/H-832-en6.pdf
(8) Reuters
http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssHealthcareNews/idUSL11997420090601
(9) Der Spiegel
http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,640853-2,00.html
(10) Your Spine
http://www.yourspine.com/Chiropractic/Swine+Flu+Squalene+Adjuvant.aspx
(11) The London Evening Standard
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23724398-details/Vaccine+for+swin
e+flu+may+be+unsafe+warns+WHO/article.do


(12) The Toronto Sun
http://www.torontosun.com/news/canada/2009/02/27/8560781.html
(13) Global Research 23 July, 2009
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=14510
(14) Video 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFcnneAqnTM

Video 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9Bvf9AaC-4
(15) Youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wg-52mHIjhs
(13) Global Research 23 July 2009
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=14510
(14) 1. video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFcnneAqnTM 2. video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9Bvf9AaC-4
(15) Stephen Lendman, Global Research, 10 June, 2009
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=13925
Surveys can be seen here http://euro-med.dk/?p=9152 and here
http://euro-med.dk/?p=9895
Happy Oyster - 27 Aug 2009 20:19 GMT
>What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations?

Clear answer: all those who spread fear against the vaccination. Because it is
them who cause dead.

Signature

                  Homöopathisches Akutmittel bei Asthma

                 http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_akut.htm

Kevysmom - 28 Aug 2009 01:42 GMT
> >What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations?
>
> Clear answer: all those who spread fear against the vaccination. Because it is
> them who cause dead.

BULL SCHIT!
Mark Probert - 28 Aug 2009 01:45 GMT
> > >What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations?
>
> > Clear answer: all those who spread fear against the vaccination. Because it is
> > them who cause dead.
>
> BULL SCHIT!

Correct. John posted bull sh.t.
Jan Drew - 28 Aug 2009 09:14 GMT
> > > >What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations?
>
> > > Clear answer: all those who spread fear against the vaccination. Because it is
> > > them who cause dead.
>
> > BULL SCHIT!

This thread is not about John.  Furthermore, Donna was replying to
Yappy.

Butt out, and read your Torah, disbarred attorney.
Bob Officer - 28 Aug 2009 21:37 GMT
>> > > >What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> This thread is not about John.  Furthermore, Donna was replying to
>Yappy.

Jan you seem to lack a general understanding that any thread is open
for anyone to comment upon it at any time.

The suggestion that Donna or John or happy can't speak for themselves
lends credence that you are a control freak.

>Butt out, and read your Torah, disbarred attorney.

Do you know what a read herring is, Jan?

Signature

Bob Officer
Posting the truth
http://www.skeptics.com.au

t - 28 Aug 2009 22:49 GMT
>>> > > >What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations?
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Do you know what a read herring is, Jan?

                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
      Wow! what a social reject. No wonder you are here all the time. Sad
that you don't have anything better to do but I guess when you have no
outside life you get a bit mentaly unhinged and need someplace to show it.
Glad you are the one living your unfortunate life though. If it were not you
some other less worthy person might have to take your place. Be sure to get
your vacs.
Happy Oyster - 28 Aug 2009 02:24 GMT
>> >What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations?
>>
>> Clear answer: all those who spread fear against the vaccination. Because it is
>> them who cause dead.
>
>BULL SCHIT!

Seems, Kevymom got caught here...

Signature

                  Homöopathisches Akutmittel bei Asthma

                 http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_akut.htm

Jan Drew - 28 Aug 2009 09:07 GMT
> >> >What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations?
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>  Kevymom

Is not the subject.
Happy Oyster - 28 Aug 2009 09:18 GMT
>> >> >What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>Is not the subject.

Janet Mae Stidd, one of the big imposts here in usenet, SHE decides hat?

She, the liar?

She, the person who stalks others for 10 years now?

She, who abuses the name of god?

She, who denies even she most simple facts?

She, who cannot even count to 2?

Just look at what happened in this news-group:

A person born on 26.11. 1946 is on 26.11.1946 born
A person born on 26.11. 1946 is on 26.11.1947 1 year old
A person born on 26.11. 1946 is on 26.11.1948 2 years old

According to Jan Drew that child would be born as a 1-year-old, and 1 year
later, it already would be 2 years old.

Jan Drew even can't count to 2.

If you don't believe that, look at the original, which was posted by Jan Drew:

>[person who for years is stalked by Jan Drew] wrote in message
>news:e5d4c9a4-edb6-429e-a95f-9b7fef936df5@y17g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>Thanks for proving you are a liar again.
>And, I am correct.
[...]

What will Jan Drew claim next?

Signature

                  Homöopathisches Akutmittel bei Asthma

                 http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_akut.htm

Jan Drew - 31 Aug 2009 21:26 GMT
<snip the repeated, repeatedly>

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIK5F4zRN0Y
Jeff - 28 Aug 2009 02:47 GMT
> What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations?
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> 1. the adjuvants - in particular squalene which was in all probability
> responsible for the Gulf War syndrome,

What adjuvants? According the CDC, the vaccine won't contain adjuvants.
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr58e0821a1.htm.

The person who wrote the article can't get his facts strait.

Jeff
Sam - 28 Aug 2009 03:00 GMT
> > What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations?
>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

 So who is correct here. Who should we believe. Either there is or
there isnt going to be these adjuvants in the vaccine.

Once again amazing how so much information is on the internet. Can
both be right.
Peter Bowditch - 29 Aug 2009 04:07 GMT
>> > What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>  So who is correct here. Who should we believe. Either there is or
>there isnt going to be these adjuvants in the vaccine.

Sodium chloride is an adjuvant in chicken soup.

>Once again amazing how so much information is on the internet. Can
>both be right.

Could some alternauts please comment on these alternative medicine web
sites promoting the healthy qualities of squalene. How come it's bad
if it's in vaccines but good if it's in a health food shop?

http://www.lifetimehealth.com/squalene.asp

http://www.thenaturalhealthguy.com/benefits-of-squalene.html

and one I particularly like:

http://www.naturalhealth.net.au/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=25&Ite
mid=45


"Squalene helps strengthen the immune system. Squalene is already
present in our bodies, primarily in the skin. As we age, the levels of
Squalene decreases, that is why we need to replenish Squalene in our
bodies".

So, get to it alternauts - tell us why squalene is bad and it is
dangerous in vaccines.

Signature

Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

Martin - 29 Aug 2009 11:56 GMT
>>> > What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations?
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 51 lines]
>So, get to it alternauts - tell us why squalene is bad and it is
>dangerous in vaccines.

I guess for the same reasons the One and Only True Cause of cancer is
a parasite in the liver AND the other One and Only True cause of
cancer is acidic blood AND also X is the One and Only True Cause
AND....... ad infinitum.
t - 29 Aug 2009 14:00 GMT
All pro vac posters, try to get a double dose if you can. Please do it soon
Martin - 29 Aug 2009 20:24 GMT
>All pro vac posters, try to get a double dose if you can. Please do it soon

And then what? If none of them have any negative effects from the
shots, what will your conclusion be? (apart from 'drinking your own
urine is good for you', that comes with, well, being you tools)
t - 29 Aug 2009 23:57 GMT
>>All pro vac posters, try to get a double dose if you can. Please do it
>>soon
>
> And then what? If none of them have any negative effects from the
> shots, what will your conclusion be?            Looks like we are in a
> wait and see situation.
Martin - 30 Aug 2009 10:15 GMT
>>>All pro vac posters, try to get a double dose if you can. Please do it
>>>soon
>>
>> And then what? If none of them have any negative effects from the
>> shots, what will your conclusion be?            

>Looks like we are in a  wait and see situation.

No, we're not. Flu vaccines have been around for a long time now. They
are safe and effective, period.
You will of course stay indoors the whole flu season, won't you? No
contact with people whatsoever. After all, you don't want to have it
on your conscience that you infected someone with a potentially
leathal disease.
t - 30 Aug 2009 14:16 GMT
"Martin" <none@nowhere.com> wrote in message

>>Looks like we are in a  wait and see situation.
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> flu shot. I have not avoided other people. I have not had the "flu'. Did
> you have to work hard to become so dense? Or are simply a genetic reject?
Martin - 31 Aug 2009 20:05 GMT
>"Martin" <none@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>> on your conscience that you infected someone with a potentially
>> leathal disease.                                            

> No, you are  wrong as usual. We are in a wait and see.

'You' are not 'we'.

> We will see how many are harmed   or killed by this new and improved brand of poison.

And if there are no reports of any harm? Will you change your mind
about vaccines? (the question is rethorical, I know the answer - no,
never)

> I have not ever had a  flu shot. I have not avoided other people.

So you don't care about infecting other people with a potentially
dangerous disease. You know, I used to not get a flu shot because the
flu never bothered me much. Then someone explained that I could infect
other people, which could even kill them. I have gotten the shot ever
since.

> I have not had the "flu'. Did you have to work hard to become so dense? Or are simply a genetic reject?
Bob Officer - 01 Sep 2009 00:45 GMT
>>"Martin" <none@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>'You' are not 'we'.

The Fallacy of the false inclusion?

>> We will see how many are harmed   or killed by this new and improved brand of poison.
>
>And if there are no reports of any harm? Will you change your mind
>about vaccines? (the question is rethorical, I know the answer - no,
>never)

The very hard part is trying to figure the number of people saved,
isn't it? If one uses a modern documented flu pandemic of 1918-1919
as the yardstick. one could guess a figure of 90% of the people in
the 2 years will be infected, and one out of every 5th person dies.
within those two years.  The item most people ignore is the next
several years people which were isolated from the st round of the
pandemic will still be getting it, the mortality rates will be about
the same for those missed the initial peak.

The only two ways to stop and control a pandemic. Isolation of entire
areas and segments of the population to limit the vectors or
inoculations.

>> I have not ever had a  flu shot. I have not avoided other people.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>other people, which could even kill them. I have gotten the shot ever
>since.

Bingo! I dislike the idea of people going to work saying it is just a
cold. They continue to spread diseases and a cold a callous and
uncaring way, Most people never stop to consider, even the common
cold can kill people if they had a weakened immune system.

>> I have not had the "flu'. Did you have to work hard to become so dense? Or are simply a genetic reject?

So he claims. Anecdotal claims are fun.

Signature

Bob Officer
Posting the truth
http://www.skeptics.com.au

t - 01 Sep 2009 14:46 GMT
>>>"Martin" <none@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 70 lines]
> And you claim to be a real human and not a troll. Please do prove that you
> are not a slimy troll from under a rock.
t - 01 Sep 2009 15:13 GMT
>>>>"Martin" <none@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>>>>>
>>>>>>Looks like we are in a  wait and see situation.
.

>>>> No, you are  wrong as usual. We are in a wait and see.

'You' are not 'we'.
The Fallacy of the false inclusion?
>> So you and Martin are not part of humanity that is effected by these
>> things? Cool, I knew all along that you were not human.
>>>
>>>> We will see how many are harmed   or killed by this new and improved
>>>> brand of poison.

The very hard part is trying to figure the number of people saved,
isn't it?
>> That has allowed the liying greedy producers of this crap to push their
>> products.
If one uses a modern documented flu pandemic of 1918-1919
as the yardstick.
>> One would be useing some pretty shaky documentation. Not like they had
>> modern labs everywhere to test their assumptions.
one could guess
>> GUESS?????? YOU IDIOTS WANT EVERYONE TO TAKE A CHANCE ON YOUR GUESS??????
 >a figure of 90% of the people in
the 2 years will be infected, and one out of every 5th person dies.
within those two years.  The item most people ignore is the next
several years people which were isolated from the st round of the
pandemic will still be getting it, the mortality rates will be about
the same for those missed the initial peak.

The only two ways to stop and control a pandemic. Isolation of entire
areas and segments of the population to limit the vectors or
inoculations.
>> I guess you bozos never thought of working to CURE disease. Novel thought
>> huh?
>>
>>>> I have not ever had a  flu shot. I have not avoided other people.

So you don't care about infecting other people with a potentially
dangerous disease.
>>> >>>>> Idiot! I have not had the "flu", so how would I infect anyone?
You know, I used to not get a flu shot because the
flu never bothered me much. Then someone explained that I could infect
other people, which could even kill them. I have gotten the shot ever
since.

Bingo! I dislike the idea of people going to work saying it is just a
cold. They continue to spread diseases and a cold a callous and
uncaring way, Most people never stop to consider, even the common
cold can kill people if they had a weakened immune system.

>> One point, it's not about what you may dislike. Work to change the system
>> so that people do not think they must go to work when sick.  Oh, but that
>> might slow the all important profit of the great machine, damn!

So he claims. Anecdotal claims are fun.

>> And you claim to be a real human and not a troll. Please do prove that
>> you are not a slimy troll from under a rock.
Jan Drew - 31 Aug 2009 21:45 GMT
> >>>All pro vac posters, try to get a double dose if you can. Please do it
> >>>soon
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> on your conscience that you infected someone with a potentially
> leathal disease.

That is a blatant lie.

Celia Hall, " Those flu jabs could be a waste of time, says expert",
Telegraph, October 27, 2006,
Link:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/10/27/nflu27.xml

http://www.medicalconsumers.org/pages/FluVaccinesDoNotWorkforKidsortheElderly.html

http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/news/fullstory_70107.html

Kids' Flu Shot Largely Ineffective Over Past Few Years
Study finds it didn't keep them from hospitals, doctors' offices

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/08/080829091323.htm

Flu Shot Does Not Reduce Risk Of Death, Research Shows

Not enough proof that flu shots work, researcher warns
Last Updated: Friday, October 27, 2006 | 2:03 PM ET
The Canadian Press
There isn't enough evidence that the flu vaccine is effective to
support public programs advocating widespread use of flu shots, a
controversial vaccine epidemiologist suggests.

In a commentary in Friday's British Medical Journal, Dr. Tom Jefferson
argues that large-scale, long-term randomized controlled trials — the
gold standard for generating scientific evidence — should be
"urgently" undertaken to determine if flu shot programs are achieving
their goals of lowering rates of cases and deaths.

Not enough proof that flu shots work, researcher warns
Last Updated: Friday, October 27, 2006 | 2:03 PM ET
The Canadian Press
There isn't enough evidence that the flu vaccine is effective to
support public programs advocating widespread use of flu shots, a
controversial vaccine epidemiologist suggests.

In a commentary in Friday's British Medical Journal, Dr. Tom Jefferson
argues that large-scale, long-term randomized controlled trials — the
gold standard for generating scientific evidence — should be
"urgently" undertaken to determine if flu shot programs are achieving
their goals of lowering rates of cases and deaths.

Flu Shot Season - Think twice before you shoot!
I'd like to repeat the Flu/Alzheimer's connection that
so many of you have asked about. According to Hugh Fudenberg, MD, the
world's leading immunogeneticist and 13th most quoted biologist of our
times (nearly 850 papers in peer review journals), if an individual
has had five consecutive flu shots his/her chances of getting
Alzheimer's Disease is ten times higher than if they had one, two or
no shots. I asked Dr. Fudenberg why this was so and he said it was due
to the mercury and aluminum that is in every flu shot (and some
childhood shots). The gradual mercury and aluminum buildup in the
brain causes cognitive dysfunction. Is that why Alzheimer's is
expected to quadruple? Notes: Recorded from Dr. Fudenberg's speech at
the NVIC International Vaccine Conference, Arlington, VA September,
1997. Quoted with permission. Alzheimer's to quadruple statement is
from John's Hopkins Newsletter Nov 1998. Dr. Fudenberg's web address
is www.nitrf.org. Interesting info on treating autism on the site.
Randall Neustaedter OMD author of The Vaccine Guide says this: The flu
vaccine gets the most-useless-vaccine-of-all-time award. Now the CDC
is recommending the vaccine for children under two years old and all
adults over 50. Don't fall for it.

Flu Facts

* Flu vaccine manufacturers are notoriously inaccurate at predicting
the appropriate viruses to use in an individual year's vaccine,
rendering the vaccine ineffective.

* Flu vaccine is relatively ineffective in those patients most at risk
of flu complications.

* The vaccine has caused GBS in recipients during several different
flu seasons.

* Those most at risk of flu complications probably share a higher risk
of adverse reactions to the flu vaccine as well.

Fluzone is the new flu vaccine for babies (recommended 6 months to 23
months). You can get it as a 0.25 mL prefilled syringe (for pediatric
use) and as a 0.5 mL prefilled syringe. Fluzone contains mercury: 25
µg mercury/0.5 mL dose. It also has chicken embryos and formaldehyde
and Sucrose, Sodium phosphate, Sodium Chloride, Mercury, Gelatin,
Polyethylene Glycol p-Isooctylphenyl Ether, Fluzone is the new flu
vaccine for babies (recommended 6 months to 23 months). You can get it
as a 0.25 mL prefilled syringe (for pediatric use) and as a 0.5 mL
prefilled syringe. Fluzone contains mercury: 25 µg mercury/0.5 mL
dose. It also has chicken embryos and formaldehyde and Sucrose, Sodium
phosphate, Sodium Chloride, Mercury, Gelatin, Polyethylene Glycol p-
Isooctylphenyl Ether, Fluzone is the new flu vaccine for babies
(recommended 6 months to 23 months). You can get it as a 0.25 mL
prefilled syringe (for pediatric use) and as a 0.5 mL prefilled
syringe. Fluzone contains mercury: 25 µg mercury/0.5 mL dose. It also
has chicken embryos and formaldehyde and Sucrose, Sodium phosphate,
Sodium Chloride, Mercury, Gelatin, Polyethylene Glycol p-
Isooctylphenyl Ether, Hemaggluttinin.

Kids' Flu Shot Largely Ineffective Over Past Few Years
Study finds it didn't keep them from hospitals, doctors' offices

MONDAY, Oct. 6 (HealthDay News) -- Over the past two flu seasons,
vaccinating children five and younger did not reduce the number of
child hospitalizations or doctor's visits linked to influenza,
according to results of a new study.

Given the poor match between the flu vaccine and circulating strains
during the last two years, "this finding is not surprising," said Dr.
Robert Belshe, a professor of medicine and pediatrics and director of
the Center for Vaccine Development at the Saint Louis University
Medical Center, who was not involved in the study.

"We know that the inactivated vaccine -- the flu shot -- doesn't work
real well in children, particularly when the virus has evolved and
drifted away from the type that is put in the vaccine," he said.

Kids' Flu Shot Largely Ineffective Over Past Few Years
Study finds it didn't keep them from hospitals, doctors' offices

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/08/080829091323.htm

Flu Shot Does Not Reduce Risk Of Death, Research Shows

ScienceDaily (Aug. 31, 2008) — The widely-held perception that the
influenza vaccination reduces overall mortality risk in the elderly
does not withstand careful scrutiny, according to researchers in
Alberta. The vaccine does confer protection against specific strains
of influenza, but its overall benefit appears to have been exaggerated
by a number of observational studies that found a very large reduction
in all-cause mortality among elderly patients who had been vaccinated.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See also:
Health & Medicine
Today's Healthcare
Vaccines
Influenza
Diseases and Conditions
Bird Flu
Cold and Flu
Reference
Flu vaccine
Vaccination
MMR vaccine
Chickenpox
The study included more than 700 matched elderly subjects, half of
whom had taken the vaccine and half of whom had not. After controlling
for a wealth of variables that were largely not considered or simply
not available in previous studies that reported the mortality benefit,
the researchers concluded that any such benefit "if present at all,
was very small and statistically non-significant and may simply be a
healthy-user artifact that they were unable to identify."

"While such a reduction in all-cause mortality would have been
impressive, these mortality benefits are likely implausible. Previous
studies were likely measuring a benefit not directly attributable to
the vaccine itself, but something specific to the individuals who were
vaccinated—a healthy-user benefit or frailty bias," said Dean T.
Eurich,Ph.D. clinical epidemiologist and assistant professor at the
School of Public Health at the University of Alberta. "Over the last
two decades in the United Sates, even while vaccination rates among
the elderly have increased from 15 to 65 percent, there has been no
commensurate decrease in hospital admissions or all-cause mortality.
Further, only about 10 percent of winter-time deaths in the United
States are attributable to influenza, thus to suggest that the vaccine
can reduce 50 percent of deaths from all causes is implausible in our
opinion."

Dr. Eurich and colleagues hypothesized that if the healthy-user effect
was responsible for the mortality benefit associated with influenza
vaccination seen in observational studies, there should also be a
significant mortality benefit present during the "off-season".

To determine whether the observed mortality benefits were actually an
effect of the flu vaccine, therefore, they analyzed clinical data from
records of all six hospitals in the Capital Health region in Alberta.
In total, they analyzed data from 704 patients 65 years of age and
older who were admitted to the hospital for community-acquired
pneumonia during non-flu season, half of whom had been vaccinated, and
half of whom had not. Each vaccinated patient was matched to a non-
vaccinated patient with similar demographics, medical conditions,
functional status, smoking status and current prescription
medications.

In examining in-hospital mortality, they found that 12 percent of the
patients died overall, with a median length of stay of approximately
eight days. While analysis with a model similar to that employed by
past observational studies indeed showed that patients who were
vaccinated were about half as likely to die as unvaccinated patients,
a finding consistent with other studies, they found a striking
difference after adjusting for detailed clinical information, such as
the need for an advanced directive, pneumococcal immunizations,
socioeconomic status, as well as sex, smoking, functional status and
severity of disease. Controlling for those variables reduced the
relative risk of death to a statistically non-significant 19 percent.

Further analyses that included more than 3,400 patients from the same
cohort did not significantly alter the relative risk. The researchers
concluded that there was a difficult to capture healthy-user effect
among vaccinated patients.

"The healthy-user effect is seen in what doctors often refer to as
their 'good' patients— patients who are well-informed about their
health, who exercise regularly, do not smoke or have quit, drink only
in moderation, watch what they eat, come in regularly for health
maintenance visits and disease screenings, take their medications
exactly as prescribed— and quite religiously get vaccinated each year
so as to stay healthy. Such attributes are almost impossible to
capture in large scale studies using administrative databases," said
principal investigator Sumit Majumdar, M.D., M.P.H., associate
professor in the Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry at the University of
Alberta.

The finding has broad implications:

For patients: People with chronic diseases such as chronic respiratory
diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, immuno-
compromised patients, healthcare workers, family members or friends
who take care of elderly patients and others with greater exposure or
susceptibility to the influenza virus should still be vaccinated. "But
you also need to take care of yourself. Everyone can reduce their risk
by taking simple precautions," says Dr. Majumdar. "Wash your hands,
avoid sick kids and hospitals during flu season, consider antiviral
agents for prophylaxis and tell your doctor as soon as you feel unwell
because there is still a chance to decrease symptoms and prevent
hospitalization if you get sick— because flu vaccine is not as
effective as people have been thinking it is."
For vaccine developers: Previously reported mortality reductions are
clearly inflated and erroneous–this may have stifled efforts at
developing newer and better vaccines especially for use in the
elderly.
For policy makers: Efforts directed at "improving quality of care" are
better directed at where the evidence is, such as hand-washing,
vaccinating children and vaccinating healthcare workers.
Finally, Dr. Majumder said, the findings are a reminder to researchers
that "the healthy-user effect is everywhere you don't want it to be."

The results will appear in the first issue for September of the
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, a
publication of the American Thoracic Society.

http://www.medicalconsumers.org/pages/FluVaccinesDoNotWorkforKidsortheElderly.html

http://www.cbc.ca/health/story/2006/10/27/flu-shots.html

http://www.medicalconsumers.org/pages/FluVaccineisRarelyEffective.html

http://www.doctorbob.com/vd--flu-shot-season.html

http://www.medicalconsumers.org/pages/FluVaccinesDoNotWorkforKidsortheElderly.html

http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/news/fullstory_70107.html

Kids' Flu Shot Largely Ineffective Over Past Few Years
Study finds it didn't keep them from hospitals, doctors' offices

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/08/080829091323.htm

Flu Shot Does Not Reduce Risk Of Death, Research Shows
trigonometry1972@gmail.com | - 30 Aug 2009 03:11 GMT
> >> > What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations?
>
[quoted text clipped - 57 lines]
> Australian Council Against Health Fraudhttp://www.acahf.org.au
> To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

I eat squalene. Its in sardines. I recall listening to the
Michael Reagan radio show some years back and
he had a woman on that made the claim that it
was the cause of Gulf War syndrome. MR was supportive
of her views but then again he also a mouth piece of the
political right views and interests.

And given its chemical nature I no doubt absorb it as
have my ancestors since they first wandered down
to the ocean and found means of eating sea life.

The only concern I have is if my immune system
could be made reactive to it. Perhaps the risk
would come at site in the body where a small bolus
of a mixture designed to incite the immune system
was injected.

Is it a risk? Have we really looked? If it is
a risk is it long term or short term? Will it
be evident in a timely fashion? I don't know.

sardines and cheese for a snack.................Trig
Jan Drew - 31 Aug 2009 21:33 GMT
Rossman - 10 Oct 2009 20:25 GMT
>> > What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>Once again amazing how so much information is on the internet. Can
>both be right.

It seems we will need to be fully educated on this issue and then wait until
the vaccines are actually out, read the ingredients, and make a decision from
there.  One thing I am sure of is that getting honest and accurate
information from the CDC on this issue (and many others) is probably not
going to happen.  The CDC is a politicized and corrupt institution and
functions only in their own interest which is most often in an unethical
manner.  Trusting the Brighton Collaboration is out as well since their
primary funding source is the CDC.
Of course vaccines are for the greater good.  We all get that.  But, they are
also dangerous and do cause collateral damage to save the "greater good".
Maybe It's easy to disregard the seriousness of the people who are suffering
collateral damage because their numbers are (supposedly) few, but I for one
take another view.  First of all, I believe the numbers of collateral damage
from vaccines are  higher than reported by the powers who control that
information.  And secondly, being a person suffering severe health effects
from vaccines, I can tell you that I would have preferred to of had a choice
about this altruistic endeavor of sacrifice for the greater good.  I
personally feel it is immoral to subject even one person to this "altruistic
endeavor" without their permission.  This is especially true for kids.  And
the decision to sacrifice ones health for the greater good needs to come out
of review of accurate and honest information on the vaccine safety, which is
not going to happen from the powers in charge of disseminating that
information.  Sure, sacrificing oneself for the greater good is a noble
gesture.  But this situation is not about altruistic sacrifice, it more like
a game of roulette.  So please, this issue of allowing the collateral damage
of some, to save the many is easy to say when you haven't felt the blow of a
severe NeuroImmune disease.  Besides, who ever said that 100 lives is more
valuable than one?  Bottom line....we need more accurate and honest
information on vaccine safety.
john - 28 Aug 2009 08:33 GMT
"Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:EGGlm.1203

> What adjuvants? According the CDC, the vaccine won't contain adjuvants.
> http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr58e0821a1.htm.
>
> The person who wrote the article can't get his facts strait.
>
> Jeff

they lie 24/7

"We probed the CDC official further about this and he insisted that the hope
of the gov't at this time is that the adjuvent-free version will be
sufficient and they won't have to "resort" to going ahead with the licensing
of the adjuvent version.   One of the enlightened women in my group went
further to ask, "If that is so, then how do you explain the fact that $300
million has been spent for the manufacture of the non-adjuvent version while
over $758 million has been spent on the manufacture of the version that
contains squalene.  The man couldn't answer the questioned, turned very red
and soon after excused himself from the  room."
http://www.whale.to/vaccine/feedback.html
john - 28 Aug 2009 08:34 GMT
"Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:EGGlm.1203

> What adjuvants? According the CDC, the vaccine won't contain adjuvants.
> http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr58e0821a1.htm.
>
> The person who wrote the article can't get his facts strait.
>
> Jeff

PS: "the CDC lady says the vaccine being used in the clinical trials does
NOT contain any adjuvant."  http://www.whale.to/vaccine/injecting.html
Jan Drew - 28 Aug 2009 09:10 GMT
Jeffrey, Pter Utz, not kids doc still believes the CDC (ORGANIZED
MEDICINE). and the government.

How sad.
Happy Oyster - 28 Aug 2009 09:24 GMT
>Jeffrey, Pter Utz, not kids doc still believes the CDC (ORGANIZED
>MEDICINE). and the government.
>
>How sad.

Janet Mae Stidd is a liar. How sad.

Janet Mae Stidd denies that vaccination works. How sad.

Here is a real sad story about a girl who died. She could not get the medicament
which could have saved her life.

http://www.childalert.co.uk/absolutenm/templates/newstemplate.asp?articleid=291&
zoneid=2


[*QUOTE*]
--------------------------------------------------------
MEASLES: A dangerous illness
by ROALD DAHL

Wednesday, April 29, 2009 - LivingwithKids Blog

[ZITATENDE]
.................................................................
Olivia, my eldest daughter, caught measles when she was seven years old.

As the illness took its usual course I can remember reading to her often in bed
and not feeling particularly alarmed about it.

Then one morning, when she was well on the road to recovery, I was sitting on
her bed showing her how to fashion little animals out of coloured pipe-cleaners,
and when it came to her turn to make one herself, I noticed that her fingers and
her mind were not working together and she couldn’t do anything.

"Are you feeling all right?" I asked her.

"I feel all sleepy,"  she said.

In an hour, she was unconscious. In twelve hours she was dead.

The measles had turned into a terrible thing called measles encephalitis and
there was nothing the doctors could do to save her.

That was twenty-four years ago in 1962, but even now, if a child with measles
happens to develop the same deadly reaction from measles as Olivia did, there
would still be nothing the doctors could do to help her.

On the other hand, there is today something that parents can do to make sure
that this sort of tragedy does not happen to a child of theirs. They can insist
that their child is immunised against measles. I was unable to do that for
Olivia in 1962 because in those days a reliable measles vaccine had not been
discovered.

Today a good and safe vaccine is available to every family and all you have to
do is to ask your doctor to administer it.

It is not yet generally accepted that measles can be a dangerous illness.
Believe me, it is.

In my opinion parents who now refuse to have their children immunised are
putting the lives of those children at risk.

In America, where measles immunisation is compulsory, measles like smallpox, has
been virtually wiped out.

Here in Britain, because so many parents refuse, either out of obstinacy or
ignorance or fear, to allow their children to be immunised, we still have a
hundred thousand cases of measles every year.

Out of those, more than 10,000 will suffer side effects of one kind or another.
At least 10,000 will develop ear or chest infections.
About 20 will die.

LET THAT SINK IN.

Every year around 20 children will die in Britain from measles.

So what about the risks that your children will run from being immunised? They
are almost non-existent.

Listen to this. In a district of around 300,000 people, there will be only one
child every 250 years who will develop serious side effects from measles
immunisation! That is about a million to one chance.

I should think there would be more chance of your child choking to death on a
chocolate bar than of becoming seriously ill from a measles immunisation. So
what on earth are you worrying about?

It really is almost a crime to allow your child to go unimmunised.

The ideal time to have it done is at 13 months, but it is never too late. All
school-children who have not yet had a measles immunisation should beg their
parents to arrange for them to have one as soon as possible.

Incidentally, I dedicated two of my books to Olivia, the first was "James and
the Giant Peach". That was when she was still alive. The second was "The BFG",
dedicated to her memory after she had died from measles.

You will see her name at the beginning of each of these books.

And I know how happy she would be if only she could know that her death had
helped to save a good deal of illness and death among other children.
.................................................................
[/ZITATENDE]

PLEASE NOTE:  this article was written some 23 years ago and as a result, the
numbers are significantly different to today, thanks to people taking his
advice.

Death from measles is now uncommon in UK and the number of cases are down to
around 1500 per year. It is extremely important  to ensure that people are
encouraged to vaccinate to get these numbers even lower. The number of measles
has been rising in the last few years - we need more people to continue to take
Roald's advice.
--------------------------------------------------------
[*/QUOTE*]

More about that family:
http://www.newyorksocialdiary.com/list/141.php

Dying is no joke.

Without vaccination in Germany alone there would die 1:1000 to 1:500 children
EACH YEAR, that is 1:1000 to 1:500 of about 700.000 children. Makes 700 to 1400
dead children EACH YEAR.

No vaccination for the children is equivalent to mass murder.

In Germany alone each year about 1700 women die of a type of cancer, which could
in about 70 percent be prevented by the HPV vaccination. Each year that
vaccination alone would save about 1000 lives.

Signature

                  Homöopathisches Akutmittel bei Asthma

                 http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_akut.htm

Jan Drew - 31 Aug 2009 21:27 GMT
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIK5F4zRN0Y
john - 28 Aug 2009 09:48 GMT
"Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:EGGlm.1203

> What adjuvants? According the CDC, the vaccine won't contain adjuvants.
> http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr58e0821a1.htm.
>
> The person who wrote the article can't get his facts strait.
>
> Jeff

http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2009pres/07/20090713b.html

Bulk Oil and Water Adjuvant

$71,400,000

$343,810,470
Jan Drew - 31 Aug 2009 21:29 GMT
> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:EGGlm.1203
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> $343,810,470

http://www.hhs.gov/Disclaimer.html
t - 28 Aug 2009 14:34 GMT
>> What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> Jeff
> Looks like ol Jeffy has brain fog again. Gets it from constipation.
Happy Oyster - 28 Aug 2009 14:43 GMT
The Rise of Diseases caused by Homeopaths and Ayurvedes using Hg, like
Hydrargyrum bijodatum rubrum

>RE: "The Rise of Autoimmune and Other Diseases in Adults"
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>subacute mercury poison of choice from the late
>1800s to the 1920s.

...and the homeopaths still use mercury in a lot of very poisonous compounds.

So we know *who* is actually responsible
**********************************************
for "The Rise of Autoimmune and Other
**********************************************
Diseases in Adults": it is the homeopaths!
**********************************************

There even is a guy in Germany who said
that mercury is safe BECAUSE it is used
in ayurvedic medicaments.

http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_rep1.htm
<quote>
Repertorium hydrargyrum
Wie man Kranken Quecksilber verkauft
19.10.2001
Sind Sie krank? Leiden Sie an einer der folgenden Krankheiten oder haben
folgende Symptome?:
Tabelle 1
Adnexitis
Angina
Colica mucosa und Colitis
Darmkolik
Diphterie
Dysenterie
Eiterungen
Ekzem
Endometritis und Metritis
Exsudative Diathese
Gastroenteritis
Gelenkrheumatismus
Gingivitis
Glossitis
Gonorrhoe
Hordeolum
Karzinom
Keratitis
Kopfschmerz und Migräne
Krämpfe
Luesfolgen
Lymphadenitis und Lymphangitis
Mastitis
Milchschorf
Nephritis und Nephrose
Neuralgie
Neuritis
Ohrensausen
Osteomalacie und Osteomyelitis
Otitis media
Ozaena
Paradentose
Parotitis
Phlebitis
Phlegmone
Proktitis
Prostatahypertrophie und Prostatitis
Ptyalismus
Pyelitis und Pyelonephritis
Reizblase
Scarlatina
Seborrhoe
Septische Prozesse
multiple Sklerose
Soor
Stomatitis
Sykosis
Tabes dorsales
Tonsillarabszeß
Trigeminusneuralgie
Urethritis
Zahnkaries
Zahnschmerzen
Was haben die oben genannten Krankheiten/Beschwerden/Symptome mit einander
gemein?
Das können Sie herausfinden zum Beispiel mit einem kleinen Buch mit dem Titel
"Homöopathisches Repetitorium"

Arzneimittellehre in Tabellenform
Herausgegeben von der Deutschen Homöopathie-Union
Pharmazeutisch überarbeitet
Nachdruck

Deutsche Homöopathie-Union . Karlsruhe
Dort finden Sie (in der Ausgabe von 1994 ab Seite 318) ein "Register der
Hauptindikationen".
Was stellen Sie fest?: Alle oben genannten Krankheiten/Beschwerden/Symptome
werden von Homöopathen mit Quecksilber
"behandelt"...
Quecksilber, ein Gift, vor dem überall gewarnt wird, ausgerechnet QUECKSILBER
soll in Medikamenten sein? Ja, es ist. Leider.
Überzeugen Sie sich selbst!
Einen kleinen Hinweis möchte ich Ihnen bei der Suche nach dem Buch geben:
Dieses Repetitorium
ist nur zur Abgabe
an Fachkreise bestimmt
Dieser Vermerk befindet sich auf der 2. Umschlagseite.
Warum dieses? Vielleicht, weil die Patienten sonst dahinterkommen könnten, was
ihnen zugemutet wird?
Im Detail handelt es sich um folgende Formen/Verbindungen von Quecksilber:
(Die Seitenzahl bezieht sich auf die Ausgabe von 1994, aus der die Daten
entnommen sind)
(Hervorhebungen von mir)
Tabelle 2
Mercurius bijodatus
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Seite 202)
Mercurius jodatus ruber
Hydrargyrum bijodatum rubrum
Quecksilberjodid

HgJ2

Verschreibungspflichtig bis einschließlich D3

Vorschrift 6: Verreibung = D1
SV Lösung = D3

Gebräuchliche Tabletten (Dil): D4, D6, D3
Gebräuchliche Ampullen       : D6, D8, D15

Indikationen wie unter Mercurius solubilis mit besonderer Wirkung
bei Anginen und Adnexitis.

--
Organspezifizität
subjektive und objektive Symptomatik und
Modalitäten :

Tonsillen, Adnexe, im übrigen wie bei Mercurius solubilis.

Anginen im akuten und chronischen Stadium, besonders wenn die
regionären Lymphdrüsen stark geschwollen sind. In diesem Fall
gutes Unterstützungsmittel der Serumtherapie bei Diphterie. Bei
chronischer Tonsillenhyperplasie täglich 2 Tabletten D4 für etwa
6 Wochen. Ferner gut wirksam bei akuter und subakuter Adnexitis.

AMB und Leitsymptome wie unter Mercurius solubilis (siehe dort).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mercurius cyanatus
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Seite 202)
Hydrargyrum cyanatum
Mercuricyanid
Quecksilbercyanid
Hg(CN)2

Verschreibungspflichtig bis einschließlich D3

Vorschrift 6: Verreibung = D1
Lösung = D2

Gebräuchliche Tabletten (Dil): D6, D4
Gebräuchliche Ampullen       : D6

Indikationen wie unter Mercurius solubilis mit besonderer Wirkung
bei der malignen Diphterie oder Angina und deren Komplikationen.

--
Organspezifizität
subjektive und objektive Symptomatik und
Modalitäten :

Tonsillen und Mundhöhle, Leber und Nieren.

Mercurius cyanatus gehört zu den hochtoxischen Hg-Verbindungen.
Neben der Serumtherapie ist es besonders zur zusätzlichen
Behandlung bei Diphterie oder schwerer Angina zu empfehlen,
wenn diese Krankheiten einen malignen Charakter mit starken
Nekrosen oder Gangraeneszenz annehmen und offensichtlich auf
die parenchymatösen Organe, besonders Leber und Niere, toxisch
zu streuen scheinen. Vorsichtige Dosierung! Mercurius cyanatus D6
genügt meist. Eventuell mit Lachesis Amp. D8 bis D12 oder
Chinacea (Urtinktur) kombinieren. Das AMB entspricht im übrigen
dem von Mercurius solubilis (siehe dort).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mercurius dulcis
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Seite 202)
Calomel
Mercurius chloratus
Hydrargyrum chloratum
Quecksilberchlorür
Hg2Cl2

Verschreibungspflichtig bis einschließlich D3

Vorschrift 6: Verreibung = D1

Gebräuchliche Tabletten : D4,D3
Gebräuchliche Ampullen  : D8

Hepatopathie, Hepatitis, Cholecystitis, Ikterus, akute
Gastoenteritis, Metalues.

--
Organspezifizität
subjektive und objektive Symptomatik und
Modalitäten :

Leber, gallenblase, Darm, Bindegewebe.

Mercurius dulcis ist bei passendem AMB (siehe unter Mercurius
solubilis) besonders wirksam in der D4 - D6 bei den
nebenstehenden Indikationen. Metaluetische Prozesse erfordern
täglich 3mal 1 Tablette D2 in Kombination mit Kalium jodatum Dil
D1 täglich 3mal 10 Tropfen.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mercurius solubilis
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Seite 204)
Mercurius solubilis Hahnemanni
Hydrargyrum oxydulatum nigrum Hahnemanni
Ein Gemenge, das im wesentlichen Mercuroamidonitrat = NH2Hg2NO3,
metallisches Hg und Quecksilber(I)oxid Hg2O enthält.

Verschreibungspflichtig bis einschließlich D3

Vorschrift 6: Verreibung = D1

Gebräuchliche Tabletten : D4, D6, D12, D3
Dil                     : D8
Gebräuchliche Ampullen  : D8, D10, D12, D15 und höher

Schleimhautentzündungen der Mundhöhle und des Magen-Darm-Kanals.
Angina, Stomatitis, Gingivitis, chronische Rhinbitis und
chronische Otitis med. Dysenterie, Colitis simplex et ulcerosa.
Akute und chronische Entzündungen des gesamten lymphatischen
Apparates. Pyodermie, Furunkulose, Skrofulose. Dermatitis und
Dermatosen, chronische Bindegewebsaffektionen. Blepharo-
Konjunktivitis, Opthalmie. Periostitis, Knochenkaries. Sinusitis.
Tendovaginitis, Pulpitis, Periodontitis. Hepatitis. Nephritis.
Lues und deren Folgezustände, besonders Neurolues. Adnexitis,
Metritis.

--
Organspezifizität
subjektive und objektive Symptomatik und
Modalitäten

ZNS, periphere Nerven, Drüsen, Knochen, Periost, alle
Schleimhäute, Mastdarm, Haut, Bindegewebe, Zähne, Leber, Nieren,
Augen.

Akute Vergiftungssymptome: Metallgeschmack, Brennen, Schwellung
und Geschwulstbildung im Munde, Speichelfluß, Zahnlockerung,
Leberschwellung, ruhrartige Durchfälle mit Blut und Tenesmen.
Albuminurie, Anurie, Kreislaufkollaps.
Chronische Vergiftungssymptome: Psychisch ist die gesamte
Symptomatologie der progr. Paralyse im AMB von Hg zu erkennen,
einschließlich der fortschreitenden Demenz, der Schriftstörung,
des Tremor mercurialis und Erethismus mercurialis. Kachexie,
Kiefernekrose, Nephrocirrhose. Ostitis, Periostitis, hartnäckige,
meist oberflächliche Hautulcerationen. Eitrige Bindehaut- und
Hornhautentzündungen.

Die wichtigsten Charakteristika sind:

1. Foetor ex ore und Speichelfluß.
2. Dick belegte, geschwollene, schrammige Zunge mit sichtbaren
  Zahneindrücken.
3. Übelriechende, klebrige, gelbliche Nachtschweiße.
4. Empfindlichkeit gegen kalte Luft und gegen Bettwärme.
5. Alle entzündlichen Absonderungen sind ätzend, scharf und von
  eitrigem Charakter.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mercurius sublimatus corrosivus
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Seite 204)
Mercurius corrosivus
Hydrargyrum bichloratum
Sublimat
Quecksilebrchlorid
HgCl2

Verschreibungspflichtig bis einschließlich D3

Vorschrift 5a: Lösung = D1

Gebräuchliche Tabletten (Dil): D6, D4

Indikationen wie unter Mercurius solubilis mit besonderer Wirkung
bei Dysenterie, Colitis, Stomatitis apthosa et ulcerosa, Angina,
Sycosis simplex barbae.

--
Organspezifizität
subjektive und objektive Symptomatik und
Modalitäten :

Die pathologisch-anatomischen Beziehungen und die AM-Symptome
entsprechen ganz denen von Mercurius solubilis. Bei Mercurius
sublimatus corrosivus sind nur alle Symptome viel heftiger. In
erster Linie bei den nebenstehend hervorgehobenen Indikationen zu
verwenden. Bei Sycosis simplex äußerliche Betupfung mit Mercurius
sublimatus corrosivus Dil. D4.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mercurius sulfuratus ruber
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Seite 206)
siehe auch Cinnabaris
Hydrargyrum sulfuratum rubrum
Quecksilbersulfid
Zinnober

(wird allgemein als "Cinnabaris" rezeptiert)

Verschreibungspflichtig bis einschließlich D3

Vorschrift 6: Verreibung = D1

Gebräuchliche Tabletten : D4, D3, D6

Indikationen wie unter Mercurius solubilis mit besonderer Wirkung
bei subakuter und chronischer Sinusitis.

--
Organspezifizität
subjektive und objektive Symptomatik und
Modalitäten :

Die pathologisch-anatomischen Beziehungen und die AM-Symptome
entsprechen ganz denen von Mercurius solubilis. Es besteht jedoch
eine bevorzugte Wirkung auf die subakuten und chronischen Entzü
ndungen der Nasen-Nebenhöhlen und der Nasenschleimhaut. "Druck an
der Nasenwurzel" ist ein typisches Leitsymptom. Häufig ist die
Kombination mit Kalium bichromic. D4 - D6 (siehe dort) angezeigt.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mercurius vivus
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Seite 206)
Hydargyrum
Quecksilber
Hg

Verschreibungspflichtig bis einschließlich D3

Vorschrift 6: Verreibung = D1

Gebräuchliche Tabletten : D4

Entspricht vollkommen den Indikationen von Mercurius solubilis.

--
Organspezifizität subjektive und objektive Symptomatik und Modalitäten :

Die pathologisch-anatomischen Beziehungen und die AM-Symptome
entsprechen völlig denen von Mercurius solubilis.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cinnabaris
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cinnabaris = rotes Quecksilbersulfid,

Daten wie Mercurius sulfuratus ruber
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ich will hier nicht weiter auf die einzelnen Verbindungen eingehen. Wichtig ist
bei ALLEN die angegebene Verdünnung: Beachten Sie, in
welch starker Dosierung es eingesetzt wird. Der Vermerk über die
"Verschreibungspflicht bis einschließlich D3" ist bei einem so starken
Gift wie Quecksilber der blanke Hohn.

In der Tabelle 1 steht nichts über die jeweiligen Verdünnungen. Man darf also
die oben bei den Quecksilberverbindungen aufgeführten
Verdünnungen vermuten. Diese Verdünnungen sind aber in einem Bereich, wo
DEUTLICH meßbare Materialmengen an Gift enthalten
sind!
In diesem Zusammenhang ein Hinweis auf die Arbeit von Fernsehredaktionen.
Die Redaktion des "MDR TV: Hier ab vier -Ratgeber" des MDR hat eine Web-Site. Zu
einer Sendung, die anscheinend am 19.1.1999
ausgestrahlt wurde, heißt es in der auch heute noch (Datum 19.10.2001)
unveränderten Webseite (einschließlich Tippfehler)
http://www.mdr.de/hier-ab-vier/ratgeber/inhalt_990119.html :
(Hervorhebungen von mir)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
<quote>
Krankheitsursachen in der Mundhöhle

Herde (siehe oben), auch Eiterherde
Energetische Störungen, die sich durch gestörte
Energieflüsse auf bestimmte Körperregionen
auswirken können, z.B. Zahn 7 oben oder unten auf
Lunge und Dickdarm, können aber auch Ausdruck
von übergeordneten Phänomenen sein z.B.
unbewältigte Traurigkeit, nichtgelebte Toleranz [1]
etc.etc. - Zähne als Grenzfläche für die Abweichung
vom richtigen Weg? Zumindest als Zeichen der
Auseinandersetzung zwischen Mensch und Umwelt.
Handfester ist die Belastung durch Quecksilber aus
dem Amalgam, das inzwischen laut
wissenschaftlichen Gutachten (Kieler Gutachten
1997) für medizinisch und rechtlich bedenklich
gehalten wird. Amalgam vergiftet den Speichel, führt
zu einer Mundbatterie mit Stromproduktion und hat
jede Menge Nebenwirkungen. Nur - keiner liest den
Beipackzettel - es gibt ihn (so) nicht. Zitat: "Amalgam
gehört entweder in den Sondermüll oder in den Mund
des Menschen". Kleiner Auszug aus den möglichen
Nebenwirkungen: Zittern, erhöhte Erregbarkeit,
Gingivitis, Schilddrüsen- und Verdauungsstörungen,
Candida-Pilz-Belastungen, Depressionen,
Vergeßlichkeit, massives Schwitzen, Knötchenflechte
der Wangenschleimhaut, das Blutbild kann sich
verschlechtern und die Resistenz von Bakterien
entstehen. Teste: Kaugummi-Test, Urin-Test (Amtest
- Adresse, Tel. siehe unten). Auch andere
Zahn-Werkstoffe können toxische Belastungen
hervorrufen, allen voran das Edelmetall Palladium.
Funktionelle Störungen entstehen durch
Disharmonien zwischen Kopfhaltung
(Halswirbelsäule) und Kiefergelenken, Zahnstellung
und Kaumuskulatur und durch falsches Kauen.
Mundspüllösung: Listerine,
Dentaperfekt+ƒ-Mundwasser (mit CH 7),
Parodontitis-Behandlung mit St. Johanser
Matricell-Ampullen. 1 Ampulle in den Mund entleeren
und 10 Minuten im Mund bewegen, erst süß, dann
wirkt das Propolis antibakteriell und antientzündlich.
Vorbeugung: Reichlich Kalzium aus der Nahrung
durch Wirsing, Broccoli, Mandeln, Grünkohl, nicht
nur durch Milch! Pflanzliches Calcium reicht aus.
Mundgeruch: Entsteht durch Parodontose und
schlechte Darmregulation - Darm und Mund hängen
zusammen.
Herztest: Prüft die Herzaktion und gibt per Computer
Auskunft über die Vitalität des Körpers und den
Schaden von z.B. Amalgam -
Reliability-Heart-Rate-Test, zeigt auch die Wirkung
der Behandlung. Sensationell einfache und sichere
Überprüfung von Gesundheitszustand und
Therapieerfolg. [2]

Wie erkennen Sie einen Herd in den Zähnen?

Körperliche Beschwerden, die nicht zu erklären sind,
können ein Zahnstörfeld zur Ursache haben.
Milchzahn im Erwachsenengebiß = immer ein
Störfeld
Zähne beschliffen mit hochturbinigem Bohrer?
Vielleicht ein Störfeld.
Schwäche oder Kollaps bei (nach) Zahnbehandlung.
Zahn- und Kopfschmerzen zur gleichen Zeit.

Ausleitung von Quecksilber, das zur
Unfruchtbarkeit und mannigfaltigen Krankheiten
(siehe oben) führen kann:
Derivatio Ha - homöopathisches Komplexmittel [3]
Dentaperfektƒ Mundwasser vor und nach
Amalgam-Entfernung
Zinkorotat (20 oder 40) 1x1
Selen - homöopathisch z.B. D4/D6
Mercusius solubilis hanemannii D6 30,0 + D12 15,0
+ D30 5,0 zusammen 50 ml, 3x10 Tropfen [4]

Achtung! Dies sind nur Möglichkeiten, alle
Behandlungen nur mit Arzt und Zahnarzt zusammen.
Endgültige Quecksilber-Ausleitungen können über 1
Jahr in Anspruch nehmen.

Weitere Methoden: Koriander-Kraut, Chlorella-Alge,
Bioresonanz-Therapie; [5]

Merke: Jede Methode sollte im Einzelfall ausgetestet
werden. [6]
</quote>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anmerkungen:
[1]
"Energetische Störungen" ist typisches Vokabular der "alternativen"
"Heiler"-Szene.
[2]
Die Aussagekraft dieses angeblichen Tests wage ich ganz entschieden zu
bezweifeln!
[3]
"Ausleitung" mit homöopathischen Mitteln ist NICHT möglich!
[4]
"Mercusius solubilis hanemannii D6 30,0 + D12 15,0
+ D30 5,0 zusammen 50 ml, 3x10 Tropfen [4]"
50 Kubikzentimer einer Quecksilber-Lösung D6...
[5]
Koriander-Kraut, Chlorella-Alge und "Bioresonanz"-"Therapie" sind
Schwindel-Verfahren.
[6]
"Jede Methode sollte im Einzelfall ausgetestet werden."
Das ist ein Kernsatz fast jeder Argumentation der "alternativen" "Heiler"-Szene.
Er enthält einen besonders hinterhältigen Trick,
angesetzt mit der Standard-Formel des "individuellen Eingehens" auf jeden
einzelnen Patienten: Der Patient denkt, daß man sich
seiner besonders schonend annimmt.
In Wirklichkeit wird ihm durch diesen Trick eine ganze Serie von "Tests"
verkauft, die er natürlich bezahlen muß. Hilft der erste
Test nicht, dann vielleicht der zweite. Hilft der nicht, dann vielleicht der
dritte... Und so weiter... Im Nullkommanichts sind Kosten
von mehreren Hundert Mark, nicht selten sogar mehreren Tausend Mark aufgelaufen.


So ungeniert wird heute Quecksilber als Medikament angepriesen. Und verkauft...
Und angewendet...
Auch bei Ihnen?
Aribert Deckers


PS: Erwähnen möchte ich auch dieses makabre Fundstück aus dem "Repertorium" der
Deutschen Homöopathie-Union, Karlsruhe:
   Poliomyelitis: Aconit., Belladonna, Ferrum phosph., Gelsenium,
                  Phosphor., Plumbum acet.

("Poliomyelitis", abgekürzt "Polio", ist Kinderlähmung...)
hier geht's weiter !
[ Das Amalgam-Zentrum ]
Copyright © 2001
Aribert Deckers
and
Copyright © 2001
Antares Real-Estate
Jegliche Weiterverwendung der Texte der Amalgam-Page ist verboten.
Verlage dürfen sich wegen der Nachdruckrechte per Email an mich wenden.
Aribert Deckers
</quote>

Signature

"Hurenweiberenkelkinder               * Gott verstößt die Kindeskinder
hasst der Herrgott auch nicht minder. * von Huren(5.Buch Mose,Kap.23)
Dies gilt auch für Ammoniter          *
und die miesen Moabiter."             * http://www.reimbibel.de

Jeff - 28 Aug 2009 15:09 GMT
>>> What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations?
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>> Jeff
>> Looks like ol Jeffy has brain fog again. Gets it from constipation.

Rather than making personal attacks, why don't you provide information
that shows I am incorrect?
t - 28 Aug 2009 19:38 GMT
>>>> What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations?
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> that shows I am incorrect?
> Why would one believe the CDC?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.