Medical Forum / General / Alternative / October 2009
[2009 Aug] What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations? by Dr. Anders Bruun Laursen
|
|
Thread rating:  |
john - 27 Aug 2009 19:55 GMT What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations?
by Dr. Anders Bruun Laursen . Global Research, August 20, 2009 http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=14851
There seems to be quite a lot of uncertainty about the technical nature of Swine Flu (H1N1) vaccines.
As a medical doctor, I wish to clarify a number of improtant issues: First, we should talk about vaccines instead of vaccine, since the vaccines vary as for their compositions and even their ways of being dispensed: some by injection, another by the nose.
I think the fears as for the vaccines can be referred to:
1. the adjuvants - in particular squalene which was in all probability responsible for the Gulf War syndrome,
2. the virus antigen´s condition (dead, attenuated, live)
3. a deeply rooted mistrust in our politicians and the vaccine producers´ motives and morals: e.g. Baxter´s live bird flu virus last Winter (12), the Bayer AIDS haemophiliac product scandal (15).
First it is necessary to understand, that pandemic vaccines are made according to two procedures:
1. The Developement of a totally new vaccine from scratch. This takes more time, administration and testing than mock up vaccines (see below).
2. A Mock-up vaccine is a vaccine with all the adjuvants of the pandemic vaccine - but without the killed or attenuated pandemic virus. (1) This virus is - until the pandemic virus is known - a different, attenuated known potentially pandemic virus, in the case of the Pandemrix vaccine for the EU it is an attenuated H5N1 bird flu virus. This is the mock-up vaccine. When the nature of the pandemic swine flu virus (H1N1) is known, it replaces the H5N1 virus in an attenuated form, the adjuvants being left unchanged.
Until now mock-up vaccine test-vaccinations have been going on on voluntary "human guinea pigs." Since most of the contents of the vaccine has already been approved, the approval of the pandemic vaccine is easier to implement.
After the exchange of virus in the vaccine, the company will have to apply for a "variation". However, this is just a matter of form, since such a variation approval is given by the EU within 5 days - which means that there is no objective testing of the vaccine requiring official approval. The safety is entirely left to the vaccine producer, who has been granted immunity to actions of damages due to expected side effects (2).
So, as you see, there is no confusion with regard to swine flu and bird flu viruses. But there is another important consideration: the role of squalene.
The average quantity of squalene injected into the US soldiers abroad and at home in the anthrax vaccine during and after the Gulf War was 34.2 micrograms per billion micrograms of water. According to one study, this was the cause of the Gulf War syndrome in 25% of 697.000 US personnel at home and abroad. (3). You can find this table of FDA analyses from the Gulf War lots on The Military Vaccine Resource Directory website (4)
a.. AVA 020 - 11 ppb squalene (parts per billion)
> b.. AVA 030 - 10 ppb squalene > c.. AVA 038 - 27 ppb squalene > d.. AVA 043 - 40 ppb squalene > e.. AVA 047 - 83 ppb squalene These values were confirmed by Prof. R. F. Garry (5) before the House of Representatives. Prof Garry was the man to discover the connection between the Gulf War syndrome and squalene.
According to his findings, the Gulf War syndrome was caused by squalene, which was banned by a Federal Court Judge in 2004 from the Pentagon´s use. (6)
As seen on p. 6 of this EMEA document (7), the Pandremix vaccine contains 10,68 mg of squalene per 0,5 ml. This corresponds to 2.136.0000 microgrammes pr. billion microgrammes of water, i.e. one million times more squalene per dose than in (4). There is any reason to believe that this will make people sick to a much higher extent than in 1990/91. This appears murderous to me.
I have contacted the Danish National Health Service: They are to decree mass vaccinations in Denmark - and yet they knew nothing about the composition of the Pandremix vaccine.
Then I addressed the Danish Medicinal Agency. They admitted that the Pandremix vaccine from GlaxoSmithKline does contain squalene and thimerosal. They have not rejected my remark that the squalene concentration is dangerous. In contrast, the AstraZeneca MedImmune nasal vaccination (8) avoids squalene side effects.
So far the use of squalene has been banned by the FDA in the US according to Der Spiegel (9). However, this may not last long (10).
"Clearly bypassing the FDA requirements for safety testing of these new adjuvants and the vaccines which contain them puts the entire population at risk for serious, possibly life threatening side effects, particularly any of the 12,000 paid trial participants (6,000 children) who are unfortunate enough to be randomized into the adjuvant containing groups."
Still, on July 23, 2009, the FDA announced, "Currently, no U.S. licensed vaccine contains the adjuvants MF-59 or ASO3 (squalene). It is expected that a novel influenza A (H1N1) vaccine manufactured using the same process as U.S. licensed seasonal inactivated influenza vaccine but administered with MF-59 or ASO3 will be authorized for emergency use only."
Furthermore, "Two of the manufacturers (Novartis and GSK) have proprietary oil-in-water adjuvants (MF-59 and ASO3, respectively) which have been evaluated in a number of clinical studies including studies with influenza vaccines. These manufacturers will include an evaluation of the utility of the adjuvant for dose sparing and higher effect in their clinical studies."
"The same document indicates that vaccines containing the un-approved adjuvants will be given to 100 children 6 months to 3 years old, 100 children 3 years old to 8 years, 100 individuals 18 to 64 years old and 100 individuals 65 and older in each of the multiple clinical trials. In addition, 700 individuals in each trial will be given non-adjuvanted vaccine".
Now for the immunological side effects of squalene to occur takes months to years - and cannot be evaluated after up to 6 weeks of observation. Der Spiegel (9) calls the mass vaccinations on Europeans a gigantic cost free experiment to provide the FDA with mass vaccination experience to clear the track for sale in the US.
EMEA admits that side effects can only be found through extensive vaccination campaigns! (1).
Here is what EMEA (4) has to say about risks of GSK Pandemrix:
EMEAs Pandemrix is commonly or very commonly associated with a range of local and systemic adverse reactions but these are not often of severe intensity and the safety profile would not preclude the use of the vaccine in healthy adults aged 18-60 years or > 60 years.
However, there are some adverse reactions known to be very rarely associated with influenza vaccines and it is currently not possible to predict if higher rates might be observed with Pandemrix compared with, for example, seasonal influenza vaccines.
Dr Keiji Fukuda, the WHO's flu chief, today warned about the potential dangers of the untested vaccine (11): "There are certain areas where you simply do not try to make any economies. One of the things which cannot be compromised is the safety of vaccines."
Which is exactly what is going on!
What I do not know is, if they are going to leave the attenuated (or live - Baxter (12)) bird flu vaccine - or to totally replace it by the H1N1 virus.
Other severe, but rare side effects are autism in children due to thimerosal (13) and the Guillan-Barré syndrome seen with 400-500 Americans after the 1976 unnecessary mass vaccinations against swine flu (14) - videos. As for additional severe side effects of squalene - see Stephen Lendman (15).
My advice: If you are forced to be vaccinated against the harmless swine flu (H1N1) - demand a vaccination with the AstraZeneca nasal vaccine MedImmune (8)- thereby avoiding squalene side effects.
References (1) EMEA http://www.emea.europa.eu/pdfs/human/pandemicinfluenza/PandemicVaccines_Q&A_4614 7609en.pdf (2) Global Research 20 July http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=14453 (3 Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_War_syndrome (4) The Military Vaccine Resource Directory http://www.mvrd.org/showpage.cfm?ID=69 . (5) Statement for Hearing Record, The House Subcommittee on National Security, Veterans Affairs, and International Relations http://www.autoimmune.com/SubcommitteeRFGarry24Jan02.html (6) Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_War_syndrome (7) EMEA http://www.emea.europa.eu/humandocs/PDFs/EPAR/pandemrix/H-832-en6.pdf (8) Reuters http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssHealthcareNews/idUSL11997420090601 (9) Der Spiegel http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,640853-2,00.html (10) Your Spine http://www.yourspine.com/Chiropractic/Swine+Flu+Squalene+Adjuvant.aspx (11) The London Evening Standard http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23724398-details/Vaccine+for+swin e+flu+may+be+unsafe+warns+WHO/article.do
(12) The Toronto Sun http://www.torontosun.com/news/canada/2009/02/27/8560781.html (13) Global Research 23 July, 2009 http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=14510 (14) Video 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFcnneAqnTM
Video 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9Bvf9AaC-4 (15) Youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wg-52mHIjhs (13) Global Research 23 July 2009 http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=14510 (14) 1. video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFcnneAqnTM 2. video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9Bvf9AaC-4 (15) Stephen Lendman, Global Research, 10 June, 2009 http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=13925 Surveys can be seen here http://euro-med.dk/?p=9152 and here http://euro-med.dk/?p=9895
Happy Oyster - 27 Aug 2009 20:19 GMT >What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations? Clear answer: all those who spread fear against the vaccination. Because it is them who cause dead.
 Signature Homöopathisches Akutmittel bei Asthma
http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_akut.htm
Kevysmom - 28 Aug 2009 01:42 GMT > >What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations? > > Clear answer: all those who spread fear against the vaccination. Because it is > them who cause dead. BULL SCHIT!
Mark Probert - 28 Aug 2009 01:45 GMT > > >What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations? > > > Clear answer: all those who spread fear against the vaccination. Because it is > > them who cause dead. > > BULL SCHIT! Correct. John posted bull sh.t.
Jan Drew - 28 Aug 2009 09:14 GMT > > > >What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations? > > > > Clear answer: all those who spread fear against the vaccination. Because it is > > > them who cause dead. > > > BULL SCHIT! This thread is not about John. Furthermore, Donna was replying to Yappy.
Butt out, and read your Torah, disbarred attorney.
Bob Officer - 28 Aug 2009 21:37 GMT >> > > >What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations? >> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > This thread is not about John. Furthermore, Donna was replying to >Yappy. Jan you seem to lack a general understanding that any thread is open for anyone to comment upon it at any time.
The suggestion that Donna or John or happy can't speak for themselves lends credence that you are a control freak.
>Butt out, and read your Torah, disbarred attorney. Do you know what a read herring is, Jan?
 Signature Bob Officer Posting the truth http://www.skeptics.com.au
t - 28 Aug 2009 22:49 GMT >>> > > >What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations? >>> [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Do you know what a read herring is, Jan? Wow! what a social reject. No wonder you are here all the time. Sad that you don't have anything better to do but I guess when you have no outside life you get a bit mentaly unhinged and need someplace to show it. Glad you are the one living your unfortunate life though. If it were not you some other less worthy person might have to take your place. Be sure to get your vacs.
Happy Oyster - 28 Aug 2009 02:24 GMT >> >What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations? >> >> Clear answer: all those who spread fear against the vaccination. Because it is >> them who cause dead. > >BULL SCHIT! Seems, Kevymom got caught here...
 Signature Homöopathisches Akutmittel bei Asthma
http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_akut.htm
Jan Drew - 28 Aug 2009 09:07 GMT > >> >What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations? > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Kevymom Is not the subject.
Happy Oyster - 28 Aug 2009 09:18 GMT >> >> >What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations? >> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > >Is not the subject. Janet Mae Stidd, one of the big imposts here in usenet, SHE decides hat?
She, the liar?
She, the person who stalks others for 10 years now?
She, who abuses the name of god?
She, who denies even she most simple facts?
She, who cannot even count to 2?
Just look at what happened in this news-group:
A person born on 26.11. 1946 is on 26.11.1946 born A person born on 26.11. 1946 is on 26.11.1947 1 year old A person born on 26.11. 1946 is on 26.11.1948 2 years old
According to Jan Drew that child would be born as a 1-year-old, and 1 year later, it already would be 2 years old.
Jan Drew even can't count to 2.
If you don't believe that, look at the original, which was posted by Jan Drew:
>[person who for years is stalked by Jan Drew] wrote in message >news:e5d4c9a4-edb6-429e-a95f-9b7fef936df5@y17g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] >Thanks for proving you are a liar again. >And, I am correct. [...]
What will Jan Drew claim next?
 Signature Homöopathisches Akutmittel bei Asthma
http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_akut.htm
Jan Drew - 31 Aug 2009 21:26 GMT <snip the repeated, repeatedly>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIK5F4zRN0Y
Jeff - 28 Aug 2009 02:47 GMT > What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations? > [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > 1. the adjuvants - in particular squalene which was in all probability > responsible for the Gulf War syndrome, What adjuvants? According the CDC, the vaccine won't contain adjuvants. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr58e0821a1.htm.
The person who wrote the article can't get his facts strait.
Jeff
Sam - 28 Aug 2009 03:00 GMT > > What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations? > [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > > - Show quoted text - So who is correct here. Who should we believe. Either there is or there isnt going to be these adjuvants in the vaccine.
Once again amazing how so much information is on the internet. Can both be right.
Peter Bowditch - 29 Aug 2009 04:07 GMT >> > What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations? >> [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > So who is correct here. Who should we believe. Either there is or >there isnt going to be these adjuvants in the vaccine. Sodium chloride is an adjuvant in chicken soup.
>Once again amazing how so much information is on the internet. Can >both be right. Could some alternauts please comment on these alternative medicine web sites promoting the healthy qualities of squalene. How come it's bad if it's in vaccines but good if it's in a health food shop?
http://www.lifetimehealth.com/squalene.asp
http://www.thenaturalhealthguy.com/benefits-of-squalene.html
and one I particularly like:
http://www.naturalhealth.net.au/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=25&Ite mid=45
"Squalene helps strengthen the immune system. Squalene is already present in our bodies, primarily in the skin. As we age, the levels of Squalene decreases, that is why we need to replenish Squalene in our bodies".
So, get to it alternauts - tell us why squalene is bad and it is dangerous in vaccines.
 Signature Peter Bowditch aa #2243 The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
Martin - 29 Aug 2009 11:56 GMT >>> > What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations? >>> [quoted text clipped - 51 lines] >So, get to it alternauts - tell us why squalene is bad and it is >dangerous in vaccines. I guess for the same reasons the One and Only True Cause of cancer is a parasite in the liver AND the other One and Only True cause of cancer is acidic blood AND also X is the One and Only True Cause AND....... ad infinitum.
t - 29 Aug 2009 14:00 GMT All pro vac posters, try to get a double dose if you can. Please do it soon
Martin - 29 Aug 2009 20:24 GMT >All pro vac posters, try to get a double dose if you can. Please do it soon And then what? If none of them have any negative effects from the shots, what will your conclusion be? (apart from 'drinking your own urine is good for you', that comes with, well, being you tools)
t - 29 Aug 2009 23:57 GMT >>All pro vac posters, try to get a double dose if you can. Please do it >>soon > > And then what? If none of them have any negative effects from the > shots, what will your conclusion be? Looks like we are in a > wait and see situation. Martin - 30 Aug 2009 10:15 GMT >>>All pro vac posters, try to get a double dose if you can. Please do it >>>soon >> >> And then what? If none of them have any negative effects from the >> shots, what will your conclusion be?
>Looks like we are in a wait and see situation. No, we're not. Flu vaccines have been around for a long time now. They are safe and effective, period. You will of course stay indoors the whole flu season, won't you? No contact with people whatsoever. After all, you don't want to have it on your conscience that you infected someone with a potentially leathal disease.
t - 30 Aug 2009 14:16 GMT "Martin" <none@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>>Looks like we are in a wait and see situation. > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > flu shot. I have not avoided other people. I have not had the "flu'. Did > you have to work hard to become so dense? Or are simply a genetic reject? Martin - 31 Aug 2009 20:05 GMT >"Martin" <none@nowhere.com> wrote in message >> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >> on your conscience that you infected someone with a potentially >> leathal disease.
> No, you are wrong as usual. We are in a wait and see. 'You' are not 'we'.
> We will see how many are harmed or killed by this new and improved brand of poison. And if there are no reports of any harm? Will you change your mind about vaccines? (the question is rethorical, I know the answer - no, never)
> I have not ever had a flu shot. I have not avoided other people. So you don't care about infecting other people with a potentially dangerous disease. You know, I used to not get a flu shot because the flu never bothered me much. Then someone explained that I could infect other people, which could even kill them. I have gotten the shot ever since.
> I have not had the "flu'. Did you have to work hard to become so dense? Or are simply a genetic reject? Bob Officer - 01 Sep 2009 00:45 GMT >>"Martin" <none@nowhere.com> wrote in message >>> [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > >'You' are not 'we'. The Fallacy of the false inclusion?
>> We will see how many are harmed or killed by this new and improved brand of poison. > >And if there are no reports of any harm? Will you change your mind >about vaccines? (the question is rethorical, I know the answer - no, >never) The very hard part is trying to figure the number of people saved, isn't it? If one uses a modern documented flu pandemic of 1918-1919 as the yardstick. one could guess a figure of 90% of the people in the 2 years will be infected, and one out of every 5th person dies. within those two years. The item most people ignore is the next several years people which were isolated from the st round of the pandemic will still be getting it, the mortality rates will be about the same for those missed the initial peak.
The only two ways to stop and control a pandemic. Isolation of entire areas and segments of the population to limit the vectors or inoculations.
>> I have not ever had a flu shot. I have not avoided other people. > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >other people, which could even kill them. I have gotten the shot ever >since. Bingo! I dislike the idea of people going to work saying it is just a cold. They continue to spread diseases and a cold a callous and uncaring way, Most people never stop to consider, even the common cold can kill people if they had a weakened immune system.
>> I have not had the "flu'. Did you have to work hard to become so dense? Or are simply a genetic reject? So he claims. Anecdotal claims are fun.
 Signature Bob Officer Posting the truth http://www.skeptics.com.au
t - 01 Sep 2009 14:46 GMT >>>"Martin" <none@nowhere.com> wrote in message >>>> [quoted text clipped - 70 lines] > And you claim to be a real human and not a troll. Please do prove that you > are not a slimy troll from under a rock. t - 01 Sep 2009 15:13 GMT >>>>"Martin" <none@nowhere.com> wrote in message >>>>> >>>>>>Looks like we are in a wait and see situation. .
>>>> No, you are wrong as usual. We are in a wait and see. 'You' are not 'we'. The Fallacy of the false inclusion?
>> So you and Martin are not part of humanity that is effected by these >> things? Cool, I knew all along that you were not human. >>> >>>> We will see how many are harmed or killed by this new and improved >>>> brand of poison. The very hard part is trying to figure the number of people saved, isn't it?
>> That has allowed the liying greedy producers of this crap to push their >> products. If one uses a modern documented flu pandemic of 1918-1919 as the yardstick.
>> One would be useing some pretty shaky documentation. Not like they had >> modern labs everywhere to test their assumptions. one could guess
>> GUESS?????? YOU IDIOTS WANT EVERYONE TO TAKE A CHANCE ON YOUR GUESS?????? >a figure of 90% of the people in the 2 years will be infected, and one out of every 5th person dies. within those two years. The item most people ignore is the next several years people which were isolated from the st round of the pandemic will still be getting it, the mortality rates will be about the same for those missed the initial peak.
The only two ways to stop and control a pandemic. Isolation of entire areas and segments of the population to limit the vectors or inoculations.
>> I guess you bozos never thought of working to CURE disease. Novel thought >> huh? >> >>>> I have not ever had a flu shot. I have not avoided other people. So you don't care about infecting other people with a potentially dangerous disease.
>>> >>>>> Idiot! I have not had the "flu", so how would I infect anyone? You know, I used to not get a flu shot because the flu never bothered me much. Then someone explained that I could infect other people, which could even kill them. I have gotten the shot ever since.
Bingo! I dislike the idea of people going to work saying it is just a cold. They continue to spread diseases and a cold a callous and uncaring way, Most people never stop to consider, even the common cold can kill people if they had a weakened immune system.
>> One point, it's not about what you may dislike. Work to change the system >> so that people do not think they must go to work when sick. Oh, but that >> might slow the all important profit of the great machine, damn! So he claims. Anecdotal claims are fun.
>> And you claim to be a real human and not a troll. Please do prove that >> you are not a slimy troll from under a rock. Jan Drew - 31 Aug 2009 21:45 GMT > >>>All pro vac posters, try to get a double dose if you can. Please do it > >>>soon [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > on your conscience that you infected someone with a potentially > leathal disease. That is a blatant lie.
Celia Hall, " Those flu jabs could be a waste of time, says expert", Telegraph, October 27, 2006, Link: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/10/27/nflu27.xml
http://www.medicalconsumers.org/pages/FluVaccinesDoNotWorkforKidsortheElderly.html
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/news/fullstory_70107.html
Kids' Flu Shot Largely Ineffective Over Past Few Years Study finds it didn't keep them from hospitals, doctors' offices
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/08/080829091323.htm
Flu Shot Does Not Reduce Risk Of Death, Research Shows
Not enough proof that flu shots work, researcher warns Last Updated: Friday, October 27, 2006 | 2:03 PM ET The Canadian Press There isn't enough evidence that the flu vaccine is effective to support public programs advocating widespread use of flu shots, a controversial vaccine epidemiologist suggests.
In a commentary in Friday's British Medical Journal, Dr. Tom Jefferson argues that large-scale, long-term randomized controlled trials — the gold standard for generating scientific evidence — should be "urgently" undertaken to determine if flu shot programs are achieving their goals of lowering rates of cases and deaths.
Not enough proof that flu shots work, researcher warns Last Updated: Friday, October 27, 2006 | 2:03 PM ET The Canadian Press There isn't enough evidence that the flu vaccine is effective to support public programs advocating widespread use of flu shots, a controversial vaccine epidemiologist suggests.
In a commentary in Friday's British Medical Journal, Dr. Tom Jefferson argues that large-scale, long-term randomized controlled trials — the gold standard for generating scientific evidence — should be "urgently" undertaken to determine if flu shot programs are achieving their goals of lowering rates of cases and deaths.
Flu Shot Season - Think twice before you shoot! I'd like to repeat the Flu/Alzheimer's connection that so many of you have asked about. According to Hugh Fudenberg, MD, the world's leading immunogeneticist and 13th most quoted biologist of our times (nearly 850 papers in peer review journals), if an individual has had five consecutive flu shots his/her chances of getting Alzheimer's Disease is ten times higher than if they had one, two or no shots. I asked Dr. Fudenberg why this was so and he said it was due to the mercury and aluminum that is in every flu shot (and some childhood shots). The gradual mercury and aluminum buildup in the brain causes cognitive dysfunction. Is that why Alzheimer's is expected to quadruple? Notes: Recorded from Dr. Fudenberg's speech at the NVIC International Vaccine Conference, Arlington, VA September, 1997. Quoted with permission. Alzheimer's to quadruple statement is from John's Hopkins Newsletter Nov 1998. Dr. Fudenberg's web address is www.nitrf.org. Interesting info on treating autism on the site. Randall Neustaedter OMD author of The Vaccine Guide says this: The flu vaccine gets the most-useless-vaccine-of-all-time award. Now the CDC is recommending the vaccine for children under two years old and all adults over 50. Don't fall for it.
Flu Facts
* Flu vaccine manufacturers are notoriously inaccurate at predicting the appropriate viruses to use in an individual year's vaccine, rendering the vaccine ineffective.
* Flu vaccine is relatively ineffective in those patients most at risk of flu complications.
* The vaccine has caused GBS in recipients during several different flu seasons.
* Those most at risk of flu complications probably share a higher risk of adverse reactions to the flu vaccine as well.
Fluzone is the new flu vaccine for babies (recommended 6 months to 23 months). You can get it as a 0.25 mL prefilled syringe (for pediatric use) and as a 0.5 mL prefilled syringe. Fluzone contains mercury: 25 µg mercury/0.5 mL dose. It also has chicken embryos and formaldehyde and Sucrose, Sodium phosphate, Sodium Chloride, Mercury, Gelatin, Polyethylene Glycol p-Isooctylphenyl Ether, Fluzone is the new flu vaccine for babies (recommended 6 months to 23 months). You can get it as a 0.25 mL prefilled syringe (for pediatric use) and as a 0.5 mL prefilled syringe. Fluzone contains mercury: 25 µg mercury/0.5 mL dose. It also has chicken embryos and formaldehyde and Sucrose, Sodium phosphate, Sodium Chloride, Mercury, Gelatin, Polyethylene Glycol p- Isooctylphenyl Ether, Fluzone is the new flu vaccine for babies (recommended 6 months to 23 months). You can get it as a 0.25 mL prefilled syringe (for pediatric use) and as a 0.5 mL prefilled syringe. Fluzone contains mercury: 25 µg mercury/0.5 mL dose. It also has chicken embryos and formaldehyde and Sucrose, Sodium phosphate, Sodium Chloride, Mercury, Gelatin, Polyethylene Glycol p- Isooctylphenyl Ether, Hemaggluttinin.
Kids' Flu Shot Largely Ineffective Over Past Few Years Study finds it didn't keep them from hospitals, doctors' offices
MONDAY, Oct. 6 (HealthDay News) -- Over the past two flu seasons, vaccinating children five and younger did not reduce the number of child hospitalizations or doctor's visits linked to influenza, according to results of a new study.
Given the poor match between the flu vaccine and circulating strains during the last two years, "this finding is not surprising," said Dr. Robert Belshe, a professor of medicine and pediatrics and director of the Center for Vaccine Development at the Saint Louis University Medical Center, who was not involved in the study.
"We know that the inactivated vaccine -- the flu shot -- doesn't work real well in children, particularly when the virus has evolved and drifted away from the type that is put in the vaccine," he said.
Kids' Flu Shot Largely Ineffective Over Past Few Years Study finds it didn't keep them from hospitals, doctors' offices
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/08/080829091323.htm
Flu Shot Does Not Reduce Risk Of Death, Research Shows
ScienceDaily (Aug. 31, 2008) — The widely-held perception that the influenza vaccination reduces overall mortality risk in the elderly does not withstand careful scrutiny, according to researchers in Alberta. The vaccine does confer protection against specific strains of influenza, but its overall benefit appears to have been exaggerated by a number of observational studies that found a very large reduction in all-cause mortality among elderly patients who had been vaccinated.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See also: Health & Medicine Today's Healthcare Vaccines Influenza Diseases and Conditions Bird Flu Cold and Flu Reference Flu vaccine Vaccination MMR vaccine Chickenpox The study included more than 700 matched elderly subjects, half of whom had taken the vaccine and half of whom had not. After controlling for a wealth of variables that were largely not considered or simply not available in previous studies that reported the mortality benefit, the researchers concluded that any such benefit "if present at all, was very small and statistically non-significant and may simply be a healthy-user artifact that they were unable to identify."
"While such a reduction in all-cause mortality would have been impressive, these mortality benefits are likely implausible. Previous studies were likely measuring a benefit not directly attributable to the vaccine itself, but something specific to the individuals who were vaccinated—a healthy-user benefit or frailty bias," said Dean T. Eurich,Ph.D. clinical epidemiologist and assistant professor at the School of Public Health at the University of Alberta. "Over the last two decades in the United Sates, even while vaccination rates among the elderly have increased from 15 to 65 percent, there has been no commensurate decrease in hospital admissions or all-cause mortality. Further, only about 10 percent of winter-time deaths in the United States are attributable to influenza, thus to suggest that the vaccine can reduce 50 percent of deaths from all causes is implausible in our opinion."
Dr. Eurich and colleagues hypothesized that if the healthy-user effect was responsible for the mortality benefit associated with influenza vaccination seen in observational studies, there should also be a significant mortality benefit present during the "off-season".
To determine whether the observed mortality benefits were actually an effect of the flu vaccine, therefore, they analyzed clinical data from records of all six hospitals in the Capital Health region in Alberta. In total, they analyzed data from 704 patients 65 years of age and older who were admitted to the hospital for community-acquired pneumonia during non-flu season, half of whom had been vaccinated, and half of whom had not. Each vaccinated patient was matched to a non- vaccinated patient with similar demographics, medical conditions, functional status, smoking status and current prescription medications.
In examining in-hospital mortality, they found that 12 percent of the patients died overall, with a median length of stay of approximately eight days. While analysis with a model similar to that employed by past observational studies indeed showed that patients who were vaccinated were about half as likely to die as unvaccinated patients, a finding consistent with other studies, they found a striking difference after adjusting for detailed clinical information, such as the need for an advanced directive, pneumococcal immunizations, socioeconomic status, as well as sex, smoking, functional status and severity of disease. Controlling for those variables reduced the relative risk of death to a statistically non-significant 19 percent.
Further analyses that included more than 3,400 patients from the same cohort did not significantly alter the relative risk. The researchers concluded that there was a difficult to capture healthy-user effect among vaccinated patients.
"The healthy-user effect is seen in what doctors often refer to as their 'good' patients— patients who are well-informed about their health, who exercise regularly, do not smoke or have quit, drink only in moderation, watch what they eat, come in regularly for health maintenance visits and disease screenings, take their medications exactly as prescribed— and quite religiously get vaccinated each year so as to stay healthy. Such attributes are almost impossible to capture in large scale studies using administrative databases," said principal investigator Sumit Majumdar, M.D., M.P.H., associate professor in the Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry at the University of Alberta.
The finding has broad implications:
For patients: People with chronic diseases such as chronic respiratory diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, immuno- compromised patients, healthcare workers, family members or friends who take care of elderly patients and others with greater exposure or susceptibility to the influenza virus should still be vaccinated. "But you also need to take care of yourself. Everyone can reduce their risk by taking simple precautions," says Dr. Majumdar. "Wash your hands, avoid sick kids and hospitals during flu season, consider antiviral agents for prophylaxis and tell your doctor as soon as you feel unwell because there is still a chance to decrease symptoms and prevent hospitalization if you get sick— because flu vaccine is not as effective as people have been thinking it is." For vaccine developers: Previously reported mortality reductions are clearly inflated and erroneous–this may have stifled efforts at developing newer and better vaccines especially for use in the elderly. For policy makers: Efforts directed at "improving quality of care" are better directed at where the evidence is, such as hand-washing, vaccinating children and vaccinating healthcare workers. Finally, Dr. Majumder said, the findings are a reminder to researchers that "the healthy-user effect is everywhere you don't want it to be."
The results will appear in the first issue for September of the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, a publication of the American Thoracic Society.
http://www.medicalconsumers.org/pages/FluVaccinesDoNotWorkforKidsortheElderly.html
http://www.cbc.ca/health/story/2006/10/27/flu-shots.html
http://www.medicalconsumers.org/pages/FluVaccineisRarelyEffective.html
http://www.doctorbob.com/vd--flu-shot-season.html
http://www.medicalconsumers.org/pages/FluVaccinesDoNotWorkforKidsortheElderly.html
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/news/fullstory_70107.html
Kids' Flu Shot Largely Ineffective Over Past Few Years Study finds it didn't keep them from hospitals, doctors' offices
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/08/080829091323.htm
Flu Shot Does Not Reduce Risk Of Death, Research Shows
trigonometry1972@gmail.com | - 30 Aug 2009 03:11 GMT > >> > What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations? > [quoted text clipped - 57 lines] > Australian Council Against Health Fraudhttp://www.acahf.org.au > To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com I eat squalene. Its in sardines. I recall listening to the Michael Reagan radio show some years back and he had a woman on that made the claim that it was the cause of Gulf War syndrome. MR was supportive of her views but then again he also a mouth piece of the political right views and interests.
And given its chemical nature I no doubt absorb it as have my ancestors since they first wandered down to the ocean and found means of eating sea life.
The only concern I have is if my immune system could be made reactive to it. Perhaps the risk would come at site in the body where a small bolus of a mixture designed to incite the immune system was injected.
Is it a risk? Have we really looked? If it is a risk is it long term or short term? Will it be evident in a timely fashion? I don't know.
sardines and cheese for a snack.................Trig
Jan Drew - 31 Aug 2009 21:33 GMT Rossman - 10 Oct 2009 20:25 GMT >> > What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations? >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >Once again amazing how so much information is on the internet. Can >both be right. It seems we will need to be fully educated on this issue and then wait until the vaccines are actually out, read the ingredients, and make a decision from there. One thing I am sure of is that getting honest and accurate information from the CDC on this issue (and many others) is probably not going to happen. The CDC is a politicized and corrupt institution and functions only in their own interest which is most often in an unethical manner. Trusting the Brighton Collaboration is out as well since their primary funding source is the CDC. Of course vaccines are for the greater good. We all get that. But, they are also dangerous and do cause collateral damage to save the "greater good". Maybe It's easy to disregard the seriousness of the people who are suffering collateral damage because their numbers are (supposedly) few, but I for one take another view. First of all, I believe the numbers of collateral damage from vaccines are higher than reported by the powers who control that information. And secondly, being a person suffering severe health effects from vaccines, I can tell you that I would have preferred to of had a choice about this altruistic endeavor of sacrifice for the greater good. I personally feel it is immoral to subject even one person to this "altruistic endeavor" without their permission. This is especially true for kids. And the decision to sacrifice ones health for the greater good needs to come out of review of accurate and honest information on the vaccine safety, which is not going to happen from the powers in charge of disseminating that information. Sure, sacrificing oneself for the greater good is a noble gesture. But this situation is not about altruistic sacrifice, it more like a game of roulette. So please, this issue of allowing the collateral damage of some, to save the many is easy to say when you haven't felt the blow of a severe NeuroImmune disease. Besides, who ever said that 100 lives is more valuable than one? Bottom line....we need more accurate and honest information on vaccine safety.
john - 28 Aug 2009 08:33 GMT "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:EGGlm.1203
> What adjuvants? According the CDC, the vaccine won't contain adjuvants. > http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr58e0821a1.htm. > > The person who wrote the article can't get his facts strait. > > Jeff they lie 24/7
"We probed the CDC official further about this and he insisted that the hope of the gov't at this time is that the adjuvent-free version will be sufficient and they won't have to "resort" to going ahead with the licensing of the adjuvent version. One of the enlightened women in my group went further to ask, "If that is so, then how do you explain the fact that $300 million has been spent for the manufacture of the non-adjuvent version while over $758 million has been spent on the manufacture of the version that contains squalene. The man couldn't answer the questioned, turned very red and soon after excused himself from the room." http://www.whale.to/vaccine/feedback.html
john - 28 Aug 2009 08:34 GMT "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:EGGlm.1203
> What adjuvants? According the CDC, the vaccine won't contain adjuvants. > http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr58e0821a1.htm. > > The person who wrote the article can't get his facts strait. > > Jeff PS: "the CDC lady says the vaccine being used in the clinical trials does NOT contain any adjuvant." http://www.whale.to/vaccine/injecting.html
Jan Drew - 28 Aug 2009 09:10 GMT Jeffrey, Pter Utz, not kids doc still believes the CDC (ORGANIZED MEDICINE). and the government.
How sad.
Happy Oyster - 28 Aug 2009 09:24 GMT >Jeffrey, Pter Utz, not kids doc still believes the CDC (ORGANIZED >MEDICINE). and the government. > >How sad. Janet Mae Stidd is a liar. How sad.
Janet Mae Stidd denies that vaccination works. How sad.
Here is a real sad story about a girl who died. She could not get the medicament which could have saved her life.
http://www.childalert.co.uk/absolutenm/templates/newstemplate.asp?articleid=291& zoneid=2
[*QUOTE*] -------------------------------------------------------- MEASLES: A dangerous illness by ROALD DAHL
Wednesday, April 29, 2009 - LivingwithKids Blog
[ZITATENDE] ................................................................. Olivia, my eldest daughter, caught measles when she was seven years old.
As the illness took its usual course I can remember reading to her often in bed and not feeling particularly alarmed about it.
Then one morning, when she was well on the road to recovery, I was sitting on her bed showing her how to fashion little animals out of coloured pipe-cleaners, and when it came to her turn to make one herself, I noticed that her fingers and her mind were not working together and she couldnt do anything.
"Are you feeling all right?" I asked her.
"I feel all sleepy," she said.
In an hour, she was unconscious. In twelve hours she was dead.
The measles had turned into a terrible thing called measles encephalitis and there was nothing the doctors could do to save her.
That was twenty-four years ago in 1962, but even now, if a child with measles happens to develop the same deadly reaction from measles as Olivia did, there would still be nothing the doctors could do to help her.
On the other hand, there is today something that parents can do to make sure that this sort of tragedy does not happen to a child of theirs. They can insist that their child is immunised against measles. I was unable to do that for Olivia in 1962 because in those days a reliable measles vaccine had not been discovered.
Today a good and safe vaccine is available to every family and all you have to do is to ask your doctor to administer it.
It is not yet generally accepted that measles can be a dangerous illness. Believe me, it is.
In my opinion parents who now refuse to have their children immunised are putting the lives of those children at risk.
In America, where measles immunisation is compulsory, measles like smallpox, has been virtually wiped out.
Here in Britain, because so many parents refuse, either out of obstinacy or ignorance or fear, to allow their children to be immunised, we still have a hundred thousand cases of measles every year.
Out of those, more than 10,000 will suffer side effects of one kind or another. At least 10,000 will develop ear or chest infections. About 20 will die.
LET THAT SINK IN.
Every year around 20 children will die in Britain from measles.
So what about the risks that your children will run from being immunised? They are almost non-existent.
Listen to this. In a district of around 300,000 people, there will be only one child every 250 years who will develop serious side effects from measles immunisation! That is about a million to one chance.
I should think there would be more chance of your child choking to death on a chocolate bar than of becoming seriously ill from a measles immunisation. So what on earth are you worrying about?
It really is almost a crime to allow your child to go unimmunised.
The ideal time to have it done is at 13 months, but it is never too late. All school-children who have not yet had a measles immunisation should beg their parents to arrange for them to have one as soon as possible.
Incidentally, I dedicated two of my books to Olivia, the first was "James and the Giant Peach". That was when she was still alive. The second was "The BFG", dedicated to her memory after she had died from measles.
You will see her name at the beginning of each of these books.
And I know how happy she would be if only she could know that her death had helped to save a good deal of illness and death among other children. ................................................................. [/ZITATENDE]
PLEASE NOTE: this article was written some 23 years ago and as a result, the numbers are significantly different to today, thanks to people taking his advice.
Death from measles is now uncommon in UK and the number of cases are down to around 1500 per year. It is extremely important to ensure that people are encouraged to vaccinate to get these numbers even lower. The number of measles has been rising in the last few years - we need more people to continue to take Roald's advice. -------------------------------------------------------- [*/QUOTE*]
More about that family: http://www.newyorksocialdiary.com/list/141.php
Dying is no joke.
Without vaccination in Germany alone there would die 1:1000 to 1:500 children EACH YEAR, that is 1:1000 to 1:500 of about 700.000 children. Makes 700 to 1400 dead children EACH YEAR.
No vaccination for the children is equivalent to mass murder.
In Germany alone each year about 1700 women die of a type of cancer, which could in about 70 percent be prevented by the HPV vaccination. Each year that vaccination alone would save about 1000 lives.
 Signature Homöopathisches Akutmittel bei Asthma
http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_akut.htm
Jan Drew - 31 Aug 2009 21:27 GMT http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIK5F4zRN0Y
john - 28 Aug 2009 09:48 GMT "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:EGGlm.1203
> What adjuvants? According the CDC, the vaccine won't contain adjuvants. > http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr58e0821a1.htm. > > The person who wrote the article can't get his facts strait. > > Jeff http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2009pres/07/20090713b.html
Bulk Oil and Water Adjuvant
$71,400,000
$343,810,470
Jan Drew - 31 Aug 2009 21:29 GMT > "Jeff" <kidsdoc2...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:EGGlm.1203 > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > $343,810,470 http://www.hhs.gov/Disclaimer.html
t - 28 Aug 2009 14:34 GMT >> What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations? >> [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > Jeff > Looks like ol Jeffy has brain fog again. Gets it from constipation. Happy Oyster - 28 Aug 2009 14:43 GMT The Rise of Diseases caused by Homeopaths and Ayurvedes using Hg, like Hydrargyrum bijodatum rubrum
>RE: "The Rise of Autoimmune and Other Diseases in Adults" > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >subacute mercury poison of choice from the late >1800s to the 1920s. ...and the homeopaths still use mercury in a lot of very poisonous compounds.
So we know *who* is actually responsible ********************************************** for "The Rise of Autoimmune and Other ********************************************** Diseases in Adults": it is the homeopaths! **********************************************
There even is a guy in Germany who said that mercury is safe BECAUSE it is used in ayurvedic medicaments.
http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_rep1.htm <quote> Repertorium hydrargyrum Wie man Kranken Quecksilber verkauft 19.10.2001 Sind Sie krank? Leiden Sie an einer der folgenden Krankheiten oder haben folgende Symptome?: Tabelle 1 Adnexitis Angina Colica mucosa und Colitis Darmkolik Diphterie Dysenterie Eiterungen Ekzem Endometritis und Metritis Exsudative Diathese Gastroenteritis Gelenkrheumatismus Gingivitis Glossitis Gonorrhoe Hordeolum Karzinom Keratitis Kopfschmerz und Migräne Krämpfe Luesfolgen Lymphadenitis und Lymphangitis Mastitis Milchschorf Nephritis und Nephrose Neuralgie Neuritis Ohrensausen Osteomalacie und Osteomyelitis Otitis media Ozaena Paradentose Parotitis Phlebitis Phlegmone Proktitis Prostatahypertrophie und Prostatitis Ptyalismus Pyelitis und Pyelonephritis Reizblase Scarlatina Seborrhoe Septische Prozesse multiple Sklerose Soor Stomatitis Sykosis Tabes dorsales Tonsillarabszeß Trigeminusneuralgie Urethritis Zahnkaries Zahnschmerzen Was haben die oben genannten Krankheiten/Beschwerden/Symptome mit einander gemein? Das können Sie herausfinden zum Beispiel mit einem kleinen Buch mit dem Titel "Homöopathisches Repetitorium"
Arzneimittellehre in Tabellenform Herausgegeben von der Deutschen Homöopathie-Union Pharmazeutisch überarbeitet Nachdruck
Deutsche Homöopathie-Union . Karlsruhe Dort finden Sie (in der Ausgabe von 1994 ab Seite 318) ein "Register der Hauptindikationen". Was stellen Sie fest?: Alle oben genannten Krankheiten/Beschwerden/Symptome werden von Homöopathen mit Quecksilber "behandelt"... Quecksilber, ein Gift, vor dem überall gewarnt wird, ausgerechnet QUECKSILBER soll in Medikamenten sein? Ja, es ist. Leider. Überzeugen Sie sich selbst! Einen kleinen Hinweis möchte ich Ihnen bei der Suche nach dem Buch geben: Dieses Repetitorium ist nur zur Abgabe an Fachkreise bestimmt Dieser Vermerk befindet sich auf der 2. Umschlagseite. Warum dieses? Vielleicht, weil die Patienten sonst dahinterkommen könnten, was ihnen zugemutet wird? Im Detail handelt es sich um folgende Formen/Verbindungen von Quecksilber: (Die Seitenzahl bezieht sich auf die Ausgabe von 1994, aus der die Daten entnommen sind) (Hervorhebungen von mir) Tabelle 2 Mercurius bijodatus ------------------------------------------------------------------------ (Seite 202) Mercurius jodatus ruber Hydrargyrum bijodatum rubrum Quecksilberjodid
HgJ2
Verschreibungspflichtig bis einschließlich D3
Vorschrift 6: Verreibung = D1 SV Lösung = D3
Gebräuchliche Tabletten (Dil): D4, D6, D3 Gebräuchliche Ampullen : D6, D8, D15
Indikationen wie unter Mercurius solubilis mit besonderer Wirkung bei Anginen und Adnexitis.
-- Organspezifizität subjektive und objektive Symptomatik und Modalitäten :
Tonsillen, Adnexe, im übrigen wie bei Mercurius solubilis.
Anginen im akuten und chronischen Stadium, besonders wenn die regionären Lymphdrüsen stark geschwollen sind. In diesem Fall gutes Unterstützungsmittel der Serumtherapie bei Diphterie. Bei chronischer Tonsillenhyperplasie täglich 2 Tabletten D4 für etwa 6 Wochen. Ferner gut wirksam bei akuter und subakuter Adnexitis.
AMB und Leitsymptome wie unter Mercurius solubilis (siehe dort). ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mercurius cyanatus ------------------------------------------------------------------------ (Seite 202) Hydrargyrum cyanatum Mercuricyanid Quecksilbercyanid Hg(CN)2
Verschreibungspflichtig bis einschließlich D3
Vorschrift 6: Verreibung = D1 Lösung = D2
Gebräuchliche Tabletten (Dil): D6, D4 Gebräuchliche Ampullen : D6
Indikationen wie unter Mercurius solubilis mit besonderer Wirkung bei der malignen Diphterie oder Angina und deren Komplikationen.
-- Organspezifizität subjektive und objektive Symptomatik und Modalitäten :
Tonsillen und Mundhöhle, Leber und Nieren.
Mercurius cyanatus gehört zu den hochtoxischen Hg-Verbindungen. Neben der Serumtherapie ist es besonders zur zusätzlichen Behandlung bei Diphterie oder schwerer Angina zu empfehlen, wenn diese Krankheiten einen malignen Charakter mit starken Nekrosen oder Gangraeneszenz annehmen und offensichtlich auf die parenchymatösen Organe, besonders Leber und Niere, toxisch zu streuen scheinen. Vorsichtige Dosierung! Mercurius cyanatus D6 genügt meist. Eventuell mit Lachesis Amp. D8 bis D12 oder Chinacea (Urtinktur) kombinieren. Das AMB entspricht im übrigen dem von Mercurius solubilis (siehe dort). ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mercurius dulcis ------------------------------------------------------------------------ (Seite 202) Calomel Mercurius chloratus Hydrargyrum chloratum Quecksilberchlorür Hg2Cl2
Verschreibungspflichtig bis einschließlich D3
Vorschrift 6: Verreibung = D1
Gebräuchliche Tabletten : D4,D3 Gebräuchliche Ampullen : D8
Hepatopathie, Hepatitis, Cholecystitis, Ikterus, akute Gastoenteritis, Metalues.
-- Organspezifizität subjektive und objektive Symptomatik und Modalitäten :
Leber, gallenblase, Darm, Bindegewebe.
Mercurius dulcis ist bei passendem AMB (siehe unter Mercurius solubilis) besonders wirksam in der D4 - D6 bei den nebenstehenden Indikationen. Metaluetische Prozesse erfordern täglich 3mal 1 Tablette D2 in Kombination mit Kalium jodatum Dil D1 täglich 3mal 10 Tropfen. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mercurius solubilis ------------------------------------------------------------------------ (Seite 204) Mercurius solubilis Hahnemanni Hydrargyrum oxydulatum nigrum Hahnemanni Ein Gemenge, das im wesentlichen Mercuroamidonitrat = NH2Hg2NO3, metallisches Hg und Quecksilber(I)oxid Hg2O enthält.
Verschreibungspflichtig bis einschließlich D3
Vorschrift 6: Verreibung = D1
Gebräuchliche Tabletten : D4, D6, D12, D3 Dil : D8 Gebräuchliche Ampullen : D8, D10, D12, D15 und höher
Schleimhautentzündungen der Mundhöhle und des Magen-Darm-Kanals. Angina, Stomatitis, Gingivitis, chronische Rhinbitis und chronische Otitis med. Dysenterie, Colitis simplex et ulcerosa. Akute und chronische Entzündungen des gesamten lymphatischen Apparates. Pyodermie, Furunkulose, Skrofulose. Dermatitis und Dermatosen, chronische Bindegewebsaffektionen. Blepharo- Konjunktivitis, Opthalmie. Periostitis, Knochenkaries. Sinusitis. Tendovaginitis, Pulpitis, Periodontitis. Hepatitis. Nephritis. Lues und deren Folgezustände, besonders Neurolues. Adnexitis, Metritis.
-- Organspezifizität subjektive und objektive Symptomatik und Modalitäten
ZNS, periphere Nerven, Drüsen, Knochen, Periost, alle Schleimhäute, Mastdarm, Haut, Bindegewebe, Zähne, Leber, Nieren, Augen.
Akute Vergiftungssymptome: Metallgeschmack, Brennen, Schwellung und Geschwulstbildung im Munde, Speichelfluß, Zahnlockerung, Leberschwellung, ruhrartige Durchfälle mit Blut und Tenesmen. Albuminurie, Anurie, Kreislaufkollaps. Chronische Vergiftungssymptome: Psychisch ist die gesamte Symptomatologie der progr. Paralyse im AMB von Hg zu erkennen, einschließlich der fortschreitenden Demenz, der Schriftstörung, des Tremor mercurialis und Erethismus mercurialis. Kachexie, Kiefernekrose, Nephrocirrhose. Ostitis, Periostitis, hartnäckige, meist oberflächliche Hautulcerationen. Eitrige Bindehaut- und Hornhautentzündungen.
Die wichtigsten Charakteristika sind:
1. Foetor ex ore und Speichelfluß. 2. Dick belegte, geschwollene, schrammige Zunge mit sichtbaren Zahneindrücken. 3. Übelriechende, klebrige, gelbliche Nachtschweiße. 4. Empfindlichkeit gegen kalte Luft und gegen Bettwärme. 5. Alle entzündlichen Absonderungen sind ätzend, scharf und von eitrigem Charakter. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mercurius sublimatus corrosivus ------------------------------------------------------------------------ (Seite 204) Mercurius corrosivus Hydrargyrum bichloratum Sublimat Quecksilebrchlorid HgCl2
Verschreibungspflichtig bis einschließlich D3
Vorschrift 5a: Lösung = D1
Gebräuchliche Tabletten (Dil): D6, D4
Indikationen wie unter Mercurius solubilis mit besonderer Wirkung bei Dysenterie, Colitis, Stomatitis apthosa et ulcerosa, Angina, Sycosis simplex barbae.
-- Organspezifizität subjektive und objektive Symptomatik und Modalitäten :
Die pathologisch-anatomischen Beziehungen und die AM-Symptome entsprechen ganz denen von Mercurius solubilis. Bei Mercurius sublimatus corrosivus sind nur alle Symptome viel heftiger. In erster Linie bei den nebenstehend hervorgehobenen Indikationen zu verwenden. Bei Sycosis simplex äußerliche Betupfung mit Mercurius sublimatus corrosivus Dil. D4. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mercurius sulfuratus ruber ------------------------------------------------------------------------ (Seite 206) siehe auch Cinnabaris Hydrargyrum sulfuratum rubrum Quecksilbersulfid Zinnober
(wird allgemein als "Cinnabaris" rezeptiert)
Verschreibungspflichtig bis einschließlich D3
Vorschrift 6: Verreibung = D1
Gebräuchliche Tabletten : D4, D3, D6
Indikationen wie unter Mercurius solubilis mit besonderer Wirkung bei subakuter und chronischer Sinusitis.
-- Organspezifizität subjektive und objektive Symptomatik und Modalitäten :
Die pathologisch-anatomischen Beziehungen und die AM-Symptome entsprechen ganz denen von Mercurius solubilis. Es besteht jedoch eine bevorzugte Wirkung auf die subakuten und chronischen Entzü ndungen der Nasen-Nebenhöhlen und der Nasenschleimhaut. "Druck an der Nasenwurzel" ist ein typisches Leitsymptom. Häufig ist die Kombination mit Kalium bichromic. D4 - D6 (siehe dort) angezeigt. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mercurius vivus ------------------------------------------------------------------------ (Seite 206) Hydargyrum Quecksilber Hg
Verschreibungspflichtig bis einschließlich D3
Vorschrift 6: Verreibung = D1
Gebräuchliche Tabletten : D4
Entspricht vollkommen den Indikationen von Mercurius solubilis.
-- Organspezifizität subjektive und objektive Symptomatik und Modalitäten :
Die pathologisch-anatomischen Beziehungen und die AM-Symptome entsprechen völlig denen von Mercurius solubilis. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Cinnabaris ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Cinnabaris = rotes Quecksilbersulfid,
Daten wie Mercurius sulfuratus ruber ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ich will hier nicht weiter auf die einzelnen Verbindungen eingehen. Wichtig ist bei ALLEN die angegebene Verdünnung: Beachten Sie, in welch starker Dosierung es eingesetzt wird. Der Vermerk über die "Verschreibungspflicht bis einschließlich D3" ist bei einem so starken Gift wie Quecksilber der blanke Hohn.
In der Tabelle 1 steht nichts über die jeweiligen Verdünnungen. Man darf also die oben bei den Quecksilberverbindungen aufgeführten Verdünnungen vermuten. Diese Verdünnungen sind aber in einem Bereich, wo DEUTLICH meßbare Materialmengen an Gift enthalten sind! In diesem Zusammenhang ein Hinweis auf die Arbeit von Fernsehredaktionen. Die Redaktion des "MDR TV: Hier ab vier -Ratgeber" des MDR hat eine Web-Site. Zu einer Sendung, die anscheinend am 19.1.1999 ausgestrahlt wurde, heißt es in der auch heute noch (Datum 19.10.2001) unveränderten Webseite (einschließlich Tippfehler) http://www.mdr.de/hier-ab-vier/ratgeber/inhalt_990119.html : (Hervorhebungen von mir) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ <quote> Krankheitsursachen in der Mundhöhle
Herde (siehe oben), auch Eiterherde Energetische Störungen, die sich durch gestörte Energieflüsse auf bestimmte Körperregionen auswirken können, z.B. Zahn 7 oben oder unten auf Lunge und Dickdarm, können aber auch Ausdruck von übergeordneten Phänomenen sein z.B. unbewältigte Traurigkeit, nichtgelebte Toleranz [1] etc.etc. - Zähne als Grenzfläche für die Abweichung vom richtigen Weg? Zumindest als Zeichen der Auseinandersetzung zwischen Mensch und Umwelt. Handfester ist die Belastung durch Quecksilber aus dem Amalgam, das inzwischen laut wissenschaftlichen Gutachten (Kieler Gutachten 1997) für medizinisch und rechtlich bedenklich gehalten wird. Amalgam vergiftet den Speichel, führt zu einer Mundbatterie mit Stromproduktion und hat jede Menge Nebenwirkungen. Nur - keiner liest den Beipackzettel - es gibt ihn (so) nicht. Zitat: "Amalgam gehört entweder in den Sondermüll oder in den Mund des Menschen". Kleiner Auszug aus den möglichen Nebenwirkungen: Zittern, erhöhte Erregbarkeit, Gingivitis, Schilddrüsen- und Verdauungsstörungen, Candida-Pilz-Belastungen, Depressionen, Vergeßlichkeit, massives Schwitzen, Knötchenflechte der Wangenschleimhaut, das Blutbild kann sich verschlechtern und die Resistenz von Bakterien entstehen. Teste: Kaugummi-Test, Urin-Test (Amtest - Adresse, Tel. siehe unten). Auch andere Zahn-Werkstoffe können toxische Belastungen hervorrufen, allen voran das Edelmetall Palladium. Funktionelle Störungen entstehen durch Disharmonien zwischen Kopfhaltung (Halswirbelsäule) und Kiefergelenken, Zahnstellung und Kaumuskulatur und durch falsches Kauen. Mundspüllösung: Listerine, Dentaperfekt+-Mundwasser (mit CH 7), Parodontitis-Behandlung mit St. Johanser Matricell-Ampullen. 1 Ampulle in den Mund entleeren und 10 Minuten im Mund bewegen, erst süß, dann wirkt das Propolis antibakteriell und antientzündlich. Vorbeugung: Reichlich Kalzium aus der Nahrung durch Wirsing, Broccoli, Mandeln, Grünkohl, nicht nur durch Milch! Pflanzliches Calcium reicht aus. Mundgeruch: Entsteht durch Parodontose und schlechte Darmregulation - Darm und Mund hängen zusammen. Herztest: Prüft die Herzaktion und gibt per Computer Auskunft über die Vitalität des Körpers und den Schaden von z.B. Amalgam - Reliability-Heart-Rate-Test, zeigt auch die Wirkung der Behandlung. Sensationell einfache und sichere Überprüfung von Gesundheitszustand und Therapieerfolg. [2]
Wie erkennen Sie einen Herd in den Zähnen?
Körperliche Beschwerden, die nicht zu erklären sind, können ein Zahnstörfeld zur Ursache haben. Milchzahn im Erwachsenengebiß = immer ein Störfeld Zähne beschliffen mit hochturbinigem Bohrer? Vielleicht ein Störfeld. Schwäche oder Kollaps bei (nach) Zahnbehandlung. Zahn- und Kopfschmerzen zur gleichen Zeit.
Ausleitung von Quecksilber, das zur Unfruchtbarkeit und mannigfaltigen Krankheiten (siehe oben) führen kann: Derivatio Ha - homöopathisches Komplexmittel [3] Dentaperfekt Mundwasser vor und nach Amalgam-Entfernung Zinkorotat (20 oder 40) 1x1 Selen - homöopathisch z.B. D4/D6 Mercusius solubilis hanemannii D6 30,0 + D12 15,0 + D30 5,0 zusammen 50 ml, 3x10 Tropfen [4]
Achtung! Dies sind nur Möglichkeiten, alle Behandlungen nur mit Arzt und Zahnarzt zusammen. Endgültige Quecksilber-Ausleitungen können über 1 Jahr in Anspruch nehmen.
Weitere Methoden: Koriander-Kraut, Chlorella-Alge, Bioresonanz-Therapie; [5]
Merke: Jede Methode sollte im Einzelfall ausgetestet werden. [6] </quote> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Anmerkungen: [1] "Energetische Störungen" ist typisches Vokabular der "alternativen" "Heiler"-Szene. [2] Die Aussagekraft dieses angeblichen Tests wage ich ganz entschieden zu bezweifeln! [3] "Ausleitung" mit homöopathischen Mitteln ist NICHT möglich! [4] "Mercusius solubilis hanemannii D6 30,0 + D12 15,0 + D30 5,0 zusammen 50 ml, 3x10 Tropfen [4]" 50 Kubikzentimer einer Quecksilber-Lösung D6... [5] Koriander-Kraut, Chlorella-Alge und "Bioresonanz"-"Therapie" sind Schwindel-Verfahren. [6] "Jede Methode sollte im Einzelfall ausgetestet werden." Das ist ein Kernsatz fast jeder Argumentation der "alternativen" "Heiler"-Szene. Er enthält einen besonders hinterhältigen Trick, angesetzt mit der Standard-Formel des "individuellen Eingehens" auf jeden einzelnen Patienten: Der Patient denkt, daß man sich seiner besonders schonend annimmt. In Wirklichkeit wird ihm durch diesen Trick eine ganze Serie von "Tests" verkauft, die er natürlich bezahlen muß. Hilft der erste Test nicht, dann vielleicht der zweite. Hilft der nicht, dann vielleicht der dritte... Und so weiter... Im Nullkommanichts sind Kosten von mehreren Hundert Mark, nicht selten sogar mehreren Tausend Mark aufgelaufen.
So ungeniert wird heute Quecksilber als Medikament angepriesen. Und verkauft... Und angewendet... Auch bei Ihnen? Aribert Deckers
PS: Erwähnen möchte ich auch dieses makabre Fundstück aus dem "Repertorium" der Deutschen Homöopathie-Union, Karlsruhe: Poliomyelitis: Aconit., Belladonna, Ferrum phosph., Gelsenium, Phosphor., Plumbum acet.
("Poliomyelitis", abgekürzt "Polio", ist Kinderlähmung...) hier geht's weiter ! [ Das Amalgam-Zentrum ] Copyright © 2001 Aribert Deckers and Copyright © 2001 Antares Real-Estate Jegliche Weiterverwendung der Texte der Amalgam-Page ist verboten. Verlage dürfen sich wegen der Nachdruckrechte per Email an mich wenden. Aribert Deckers </quote>
 Signature "Hurenweiberenkelkinder * Gott verstößt die Kindeskinder hasst der Herrgott auch nicht minder. * von Huren(5.Buch Mose,Kap.23) Dies gilt auch für Ammoniter * und die miesen Moabiter." * http://www.reimbibel.de
Jeff - 28 Aug 2009 15:09 GMT >>> What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations? >>> [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] >> Jeff >> Looks like ol Jeffy has brain fog again. Gets it from constipation. Rather than making personal attacks, why don't you provide information that shows I am incorrect?
t - 28 Aug 2009 19:38 GMT >>>> What's the Danger of Swine Flu Vaccinations? >>>> [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > that shows I am incorrect? > Why would one believe the CDC?
|
|
|