>Subject: The Kadile case and chelation
>From: "Peter Moran" moringa@gil.com.au
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>Neither the NACHF, nor Dr Barrett nor any healthfraud agency was responsible
>for bringing the case against him.
LOL,,,,,,,,,,,,says who???
>The FDA and some insurance agencies
>brought the local medical board's attention to the fate of certain of
>Kadile's patients who had undergone chelation.
Who cooked up the deal with the FDA and insurance companies???
>Court documents show that of five patients who underwent chelation two
>subsequently had heart attacks, one of whom died, and another had a stroke.
>This is what initially brought him to the attention of these parties.
These facts were never disputed in court. Neither was the fact that he
>was advertising the treatment with many false claims.
What fact??? Where??
>His case was lost.
Oh??
Says who??
>He is to undergo assessment of his competency to
>practice and retraining if necessary. He is to pay costs.
>An interesting outcome is that Kadile can still do chelation therapy as an
>off-label usage of chelation agents that happen to be approved by the FDA
>for other purposes.
Great!
> So much for the supposed suppression of the method.
Oh, it is not supposed, not by a long shot. The fact is, it works and people
want it.
>If you are a true-blue alternative believer you can thus still go and see Dr
>Kadile for your chelation. You will merely have to sign a consent form
>stating that you have been given certain advice regarding it (that you are
>quite free to disbelieve).
Or believe.
>So much for the supposed suppression of this
>common quack practice.
>
>Peter Moran
LOL,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
It's not suppressed, it's just a common quack practice.
ZZzz.
Your source would be??
>No pateint had documented benefits
NO compllaints were made from any patients.
>What happened was that a complaint was made
But NOT from Quck Barrett or the NACHF.
And I am the *king* of England, just ask me.
Jan
Hawki63 - 21 Mar 2004 08:21 GMT
>Subject: Re: The Kadile case and chelation
>From: jdrew63929@aol.com (Jan)
>Date: 3/20/2004 8:28 PM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: <20040320232805.23508.00000096@mb-m15.aol.com>
>NO compllaints were made from any patients.
nah...surely not the two who had heart attacks (one died)..and the one with a
stroke..
perhaps they are as dumb as you Janny
hawki.....
> Haven't heard from our mate Tim Bolen for a while, so an update on the
> Kadile case that refers to the true facts, now that it is concluded and
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
> What happened was that a complaint was made
The Final Order directly from the Board:
http://www.drl.state.wi.us/Regulation/html/1103014.htm
MHA Needs More Skeptics - 22 Mar 2004 19:59 GMT
>> Haven't heard from our mate Tim Bolen for a while, so an update on the
>> Kadile case that refers to the true facts, now that it is concluded and
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>
>http://www.drl.state.wi.us/Regulation/html/1103014.htm
Thank you for posting that link. With the exception of Anth, it appears that
almost all the proper citations & research are being done by skeptics.
Mark Probert-March 23, 2004 - 23 Mar 2004 15:49 GMT
> >"Peter Moran" <moringa@gil.com.au> wrote in message
> >
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
> Thank you for posting that link. With the exception of Anth, it appears that
> almost all the proper citations & research are being done by skeptics.
It is a tough job, considering how many lies and yarns the Alties like to
spin.
>Haven't heard from our mate Tim Bolen for a while, so an update on the
>Kadile case that refers to the true facts, now that it is concluded and
>participants can sp[eak more freely.
Some random thoughts about bin Blowpipe ....
The proctologist had a press conference. They found his head.
He needs to save his breath... he'll need it to inflate his date.
He's a guy .. just because he has one, doesn't mean he has to be one.
Some people are alive only because it's illegal to shoot them.