 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / General / Alternative / June 2009The truth About Naturopathic
http://www.lucid-tv.com/146.html  SignatureBob Officer Posting the truth http://www.skeptics.com.au > http://www.lucid-tv.com/146.html > -- > Bob Officer > Posting the truthhttp://www.skeptics.com.au Industry propaganda. On Jun 27, 8:52 pm, Bob Officer <boboffic...@127.0.0.7> wrote: > http://www.lucid-tv.com/146.html > -- > Bob Officer > Posting the truthhttp://www.skeptics.com.au <Industry propaganda. Activist statement, no truth required. > On Jun 27, 8:52 pm, Bob Officer <boboffic...@127.0.0.7> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Activist statement, no truth required. Prejudicial ad hominem. tsk tsk > > "PeterB" <p...@mytrashmail.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Prejudicial ad hominem. tsk tsk Dear Well Poisoner: You have no highground from which to whine about logical fallacies. Results 1 - 10 of about 1,820 for markprobert@lumbercartel.com logical fallacies.. (0.52 seconds) That's how long this has been going on. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIK5F4zRN0Y >Results 1 - 10 of about 1,820 for markprobert@lumbercartel.com logical >fallacies.. (0.52 seconds) This is a fun Game, I can play too. Results 1 - 10 of about 98,600 for jan drew logical fallacies. (0.37 seconds) I took less time and got more hits. What Do I win? >That's how long this has been going on. > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIK5F4zRN0Y SignatureBob Officer Posting the truth http://www.skeptics.com.au > > > "PeterB" <p...@mytrashmail.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > You have no highground from which to whine about logical fallacies. The bitter wells you find are your own, Markey, I'm just here to discuss the facts. On Jun 28, 1:52 am, "Peter B." <i...@i-brag.com> wrote: > "PeterB" <p...@mytrashmail.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Activist statement, no truth required. Prejudicial ad hominem. tsk tsk ==================== WOW! What a big baby, the truth hurt you that much that you use words that do not fit the circumstance? Have you ever counted up the phrases you write/speak instinctively by rote? Ever realize you're little different than a parrot? > On Jun 28, 1:52 am, "Peter B." <i...@i-brag.com> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > WOW! What a big baby, the truth hurt you that much that you use words > that do not fit the circumstance? Wrong. I am self identified as a health activist and the other poster says that because of that fact I am to be considered untruthful. Do you agree with him? > Have you ever counted up the phrases you write/speak instinctively by > rote? Ever realize you're little different than a parrot? Ever realize that you're not as bright as a parrot? And I'm not talking about the feathers. On Jun 28, 11:11 pm, "Peter B." <i...@i-brag.com> wrote: > "PeterB" <p...@mytrashmail.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > WOW! What a big baby, the truth hurt you that much that you use words > that do not fit the circumstance? Wrong. I am self identified as a health activist and the other poster says that because of that fact I am to be considered untruthful. Do you agree with him? ----------------------------------- No truth required=considered untruthful? That would show gross lack of comprehension. > Have you ever counted up the phrases you write/speak instinctively by > rote? Ever realize you're little different than a parrot? Ever realize that you're not as bright as a parrot? And I'm not talking about the feathers. ============================== Funny, best you can do? For some reason I am not surprised. Your reading comprehension leaves a lot to be desired. > On Jun 28, 11:11 pm, "Peter B." <i...@i-brag.com> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > ----------------------------------- > No truth required=considered untruthful? No, idiot, it meant he agreed with me on an unconcious level and is struggling to let it out. > That would show gross lack of comprehension. Thist shows you type under the influence of stupidity. > > Have you ever counted up the phrases you write/speak instinctively by > > rote? Ever realize you're little different than a parrot? [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > ============================== > Funny, best you can do? For some reason I am not surprised. You can't surprise a brain dead trolling chimp. > Your reading comprehension leaves a lot to be desired. Reading what you write requires none. On Jun 27, 8:52 pm, Bob Officer <boboffic...@127.0.0.7> wrote: > http://www.lucid-tv.com/146.html > -- > Bob Officer > Posting the truthhttp://www.skeptics.com.au >Industry propaganda. And advertising. > On Jun 27, 8:52 pm, Bob Officer <boboffic...@127.0.0.7> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > And advertising. Right again. >> On Jun 27, 8:52 pm, Bob Officer <boboffic...@127.0.0.7> wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > >Right again. Wrong. It is a properly delimited signature, which contains only a URL. It the URL in my properly delimited signature is consider advertising, then each and everyone one of Jan's also contains Advertising also. As well as your own. http://groups.google.com is in your headers. When I pull up that web page I get advertisements. Jan recently posted a URL to u-tube, the page had advertising Now the big question why is jan making a big deal out it? and Why are you supporting a mentally ill control freak, like her? SignatureBob Officer Posting the truth http://www.skeptics.com.au X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18005 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18005 Message-ID: <4BX1m.5072$kA.2189@nlpi068.nbdc.sbc.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.72.58.43 X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net X-Trace: nlpi068.nbdc.sbc.com 1246250432 ST000 68.72.58.43 (Mon, 29 Jun 2009 00:40:32 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 00:40:32 EDT Organization: at&t http://my.att.net/ >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal >X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18005 [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 00:40:32 EDT >Organization: at&t http://my.att.net/ Interesting character, isn't it? Signature"Die Weiber sind hauptsächlich dazu bestimmt, die Geilheit der Männer zu befriedigen." Johannes Chrysostomos, 349-407, gr. Kirchenlehrer Über das wahre Wesen der Biblischen http://www.reimbibel.de ** ** Bobby, you would not know truth if were standing in front of you. And you are incurable. > http://www.lucid-tv.com/146.html |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2010 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.