Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Alternative / March 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Mercury Exposure in Vaccines/Amalgam Fillings Linked To Epidemic Autism and Neurological Disease

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
john - 16 Mar 2004 23:16 GMT
For Immediate Release
Please freely disseminate with copyright intact
UnInformed Consent
Monday -  March 15, 2004 12:00AM
For Online access to this press release go to:
http://www.universityofhealth.net/PR/3304PRUSNOMHearing.htm

Experts Warn Officials -

Massive Mercury Exposure in Vaccines/Amalgam Fillings Linked To
Epidemic
Levels of Autism and Neurological Disease.  
Allege Enormous Conflicts of Interest - Cover-up.

For Complete In-Depth Coverage and Stats of US National Academy of
Sciences
Continuing Investigation.
http://www.universityofhealth.net/NAS/NAS%20Roster.htm  <=== Go here
to see
video of experts and Congressman Weldon's address about Dr. Wakefield.

UNINFORMED CONSENT, WA DC - Hot accusations of whom to blame swam
amongst
rumors that the US National Academy of Sciences nearly canceled their
hearing because of threats.  NAS staff carefully heeled media
cameramen and
a daylong pressure cooker of expert testimony began.  

The Immunization Safety Review Committee, (ISRC), for the National
Institute of Medicine, (NOM), under the US National Academy of
Sciences,
(NAS), heard testimony from 15 experts in a day long "Safety Review"
on
mercury levels in vaccines/dental amalgam and links to epidemic levels
of
autism.  http://www.iom.edu/subpage.asp?id=18065  

Whether the CDC, (Centers for Disease Control), (and a fraternity of
other
government agencies charged with public safety oversight of
pharmaceuticals
and medical practices), have acted in the best interests of
pharmaceutical
cartels instead of the public is at the core.

This was the ninth and the latest in a series of hearings that began
in
January of 2001 on vaccine safety.  Although in July of 2001, the ISRC
called for the, "removal of thimerosal from vaccines as a
precautionary
step in the effort to minimize children's exposure to mercury", no
action
has been taken to heed their recommendation.  (See recommendation)
http://books.nap.edu/books/0309076366/html/75.html#pagetop  .  

Fears that failure to act may have maimed an entire generation of
children
was clearly the primarily focus on the minds of most throughout the
hearing.

While opening remarks from the IRSC Chair, Dr. Marie McCormick,
defended
the committee's knowledge and commitment by showing the audience a 6
inch
binder of collected data stating the information was "copied on both
sides
and that the committee has read them.  Believe me, they have read
them."
http://www.streamload.com/UIC/McCormick.rm  (See video of McCormick),
an
irascible US Congressman Dave Weldon, (R-FL), also a physician,
chastised
the CDC's lack of cooperation.  Weldon stated the CDC have "erected
excessive barriers and have imposed severe limits on access to this
data"
to researchers and others in congressional investigations over the
past two
years, http://www.streamload.com/UIC/weldon.rm     (See video of
Weldon),
http://www.autismcanada.org/News/Weldon.pdf (Text of Weldon address)

The audience consisted of a virtual plethora of powerful interests,
included media, journalists, world acclaimed experts, congressional
representatives, representatives of the FDA, CDC, NIH, ADA, corporate
pharmaceutical executives, a diverse infusion of the dental community
and
parents of autistic children, some of them physicians themselves.  

Many of the presentations were of peer-reviewed studies presented by
their
own authors.  Each were required to disclose any possible conflicts of
interest in the way of outside funding that might be interpreted as
influencing the outcome of their research and reflect on their
credibility.
(See video clips of each expert and disclosures)
http://www.universityofhealth.net/NAS/NAS%20Roster.htm

Commonly connected were experts who had no conflicts of interest, all
visibly shaken that current practices have exposed an entire
generation to
a dangerous level of the powerful neurotoxin mercury without
consideration
of the bio accumulative consequences.  Some even chastised themselves
for
their own failure to act sooner when waves of parents of autistic
children
begged them to listen.  (See video clips of each expert and
disclosures)
http://www.universityofhealth.net/NAS/NAS%20Roster.htm

One expert, Dr. Marc Geier, a physician, board certified geneticist
and
vaccine researcher, has been doing research for over 30 years.  Geier
has
published in over 30 different peer-reviewed publications has been
investigating vaccine safety, including the CDC's own Vaccine Adverse
Effects Reporting System, (VAERS), for Congress.    Geier told the
committee,  "This society is going to be in big trouble - we cannot
have a
whole generation of people damaged the way this is happening."   Geier
went
on to say vaccine manufacturers have begun to mislabel vaccines so
that the
thimerosal cannot be tracked.  "I must say I'm a little bit
embarrassed to
stand here and listen to Verstraeten's work being presented after what
they
said at Simpsonwood,"  (referring to an ad hoc meeting at the
Simpsonwood
Meeting Center in Atlanta in 2000 discussing what to do about
Verstraeten's
original and alarming findings). " This is NOT a scientific issue.
This is
about as proven issue as we're ever going to see.  What's occurring
here is
a cover-up under the guise of protecting the vaccine program."

After discussing various studies and presenting some compelling
studies of
his own, Dr. Boyd Haley, PhD, Chemistry Chair at the University of
Kentucky
stated he was "baffled how there can be such different results from
people
using the same database," To which one IRS committee member retorted,
"Are
you implying the epidemiologists lied?"  Haley responded,  "I'm
implying
that some epidemiologists lied, yes."

Only four of six of those with succinct conflicts of interest with
funding
from pharmaceutical interests could represent that they found no
problem
with the powerful additive, mercury.  The remaining two had unclear
but
likely conflicts of interests and rescinded an opinion. (See video
clips
and stats of experts and disclosures)
http://www.universityofhealth.net/NAS/NAS%20Roster.htm

Media and for more in depth information on this developing story
contact:
UnInformed Consent - 425 487 2358 - qci@oz.net  or visit:
www.uninformedconsent.com

Copyright © 2003 QCI. All rights reserved. Republication and
redissemination of these contents are expressly prohibited without QCI
prior written consent.

--
DEFINITION * TREATMENT * PREVENTION
Autism is 1 in 150 children today, 1 in 68 families!  TAAP (The Autism
Autoimmunity Project) is a non profit charity dedicated to obtaining
funding for independent research addressing immune and immunogenetic
abnormalities in autism.  Please visit our website for more
information at http://www.AutismAutoimmunityProject.org and help us
put an end to this silent epidemic!!!  Know the Cause, FUND the Cure!
Mark Probert-March 14, 2004 - 16 Mar 2004 23:33 GMT
> For Immediate Release
> Please freely disseminate with copyright intact
> UnInformed Consent
> Monday -  March 15, 2004 12:00AM

> Copyright ? 2003 QCI. All rights reserved. Republication and
> redissemination of these contents are expressly prohibited without QCI
> prior written consent.

Published in 2004 and copyrighted in 2003...hmmm....
Jeff - 26 Mar 2004 05:37 GMT
The news organization is talking about the last of a series of hearings in
2001. How recent.

Jeff
> For Immediate Release
> Please freely disseminate with copyright intact
[quoted text clipped - 173 lines]
> information at http://www.AutismAutoimmunityProject.org and help us
> put an end to this silent epidemic!!!  Know the Cause, FUND the Cure!
Jan - 26 Mar 2004 07:46 GMT
>Subject: Re: Mercury Exposure in Vaccines/Amalgam Fillings Linked To Epidemic
>Autism and Neurological Disease
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>Jeff

There are now hearings of what happened in 2001, your point??

Nuttin else to say,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Ah?

Jan

>> For Immediate Release
>> Please freely disseminate with copyright intact
[quoted text clipped - 173 lines]
>> information at http://www.AutismAutoimmunityProject.org and help us
>> put an end to this silent epidemic!!!  Know the Cause, FUND the Cure!
Jonathan Smith - 26 Mar 2004 17:46 GMT
> For Immediate Release
> Please freely disseminate with copyright intact
> UnInformed Consent
> Monday -  March 15, 2004 12:00AM
> For Online access to this press release go to:
> http://www.universityofhealth.net/PR/3304PRUSNOMHearing.htm

I went and actually read some of this.

I noted an interesting conclusion by the reporters.  They suggested
that the panelists who had no conflict of interest agreed that there
was an autism/vaccine/mercury link and those with a conflict of
interest did not.

Mark Geier (the elder of the twosome) is listed as not having a
conflict of interest.

Well, his role as a paid advisor and consultant to the anti-vac
organizations and his paid testimony in suits looking for compensation
from vaccine manufacturers, and his sons Medcon business all are
directly linked to the need for this link to exist.

Is this an example of a Wakefieldesque version of "conflict"?  As long
as it is on the side of "right" and not "commercial", it isn't a
potential for bias?

What kind of double standard is this?

Here's how it's reported:

"They [Geier the elder and Geier the younger] have been summoned and
reported to Congress as expert witnesses many times and have been
called as expert witnesses in other actions.  They disclosed no
conflicts of interest."

> Experts Warn Officials -
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>  (See video clips of each expert and disclosures)
> http://www.universityofhealth.net/NAS/NAS%20Roster.htm 

Geier is listed as not having any potential conflict.  As far as I'm
concerned, thats a lie.

> Commonly connected were experts who had no conflicts of interest, all
> visibly shaken that current practices have exposed an entire
> generation to
> a dangerous level of the powerful neurotoxin mercury without
> consideration
> of the bio accumulative consequences.

> One expert, Dr. Marc Geier, a physician, board certified geneticist
> and
> vaccine researcher, has been doing research for over 30 years.  Geier
> has
> published in over 30 different peer-reviewed publications

He has published in peer reviewed publications but not often has he
published peer reviewed papers.  Letters and notes don't really count
as peer review.

Lie number 2.

Geier is quoted as saying:

"This is NOT a scientific issue. This is about as proven issue as
we're ever going to see.  What's occurring here is a cover-up under
the guise of protecting the vaccine program."

I found this to be the crux of it:

> Only four of six of those with succinct conflicts of interest with
> funding
> from pharmaceutical interests could represent that they found no
> problem
> with the powerful additive, mercury.  

So, it is only a conflict of interest if the conflict is predicated on
funding from a commercial source.  If you make your money from
consulting to "advocacy" organizations or from lawyers intersted in
the "truth", it's not a potential source of conflict?

Another boatload of crap.

js
abacus - 27 Mar 2004 22:28 GMT
> > For Immediate Release
> > Please freely disseminate with copyright intact
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> What kind of double standard is this?

SNIP of relevant details

> So, it is only a conflict of interest if the conflict is predicated on
> funding from a commercial source.  If you make your money from
> consulting to "advocacy" organizations or from lawyers intersted in
> the "truth", it's not a potential source of conflict?
>
> Another boatload of crap.

You're right, and the pervasiveness of potential conflicts of interest
by all the experts in the field is a real problem in my opinion.  What
I don't understand is why it is that you object to this potential
source of conflict when you have so staunchly defended the other as
being unimportant and of no consequence to those who might want to
rely on their opinions?
Jonathan Smith - 29 Mar 2004 19:08 GMT
> > > For Immediate Release
> > > Please freely disseminate with copyright intact
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
> being unimportant and of no consequence to those who might want to
> rely on their opinions?

It was UNDISCLOSED!  Worse, it is hidden.  He was ASKED directly if he
had any potential confklicts of interest and he said NO.

Are you that slow on the uptake?  I have no problem with people having
financial relationships. When it is disclosed, the potential conflict
can e assessed by those using the information.  Not a big deal.

The problem is when people have potential financial conflicts and they
hide them.  Like what happened with Wakefield and what is happening
right here and now with the Geiers.  They had the NERVE to say they
have NO potential conflict yet their entire livelihood is dependent on
the link vaccines/mercury/autism.  They live off of their consulting
fees to anti-vac lawyers.  They lied when they said they have no
potential conflicts of interest.

When Offit openly lists Merck as a source of income for his
consultancy, I can deal with it.  When Geier says he has no potential
conflicts yet hires himself out for expert testimony he's flat out
lying.

Got it?

good.

js
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.