Medical Forum / General / Alternative / September 2008
Scientists warn US Congress of cancer risk for cell phone use
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Ilena Rose - 26 Sep 2008 00:24 GMT Serious and concerning news from Health Lover, Ilena Rosenthal: http://ilenarose.blogspot.com
Years ago when I saw that the junkscience / ACSH / industry backed front groups were claiming that cell phones were "safe" ... I realized there was probably serious problems. Industries don't spend huge PR$$$$ (like Dow Chemical for breast implants, Monsanto for GM seeds, aspartame, etc., Merck for vaccinations) unless they have plenty to hide.
May God protect us ... because the quacky frontgroups of these huge industries will continue to lie to us ... giving false assurances on dangerous products. www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/QuackWatchWatch.htm www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/snake-oil.htm http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=080925220553.si7sokjt&show_article=1
Mobile phone use 'raises children's risk of brain cancer fivefold' Scientists on Thursday warned US legislators of the risks of brain cancer from cell phone use, highlighting the potential risk for children who use mobile phones.
"We urgently need more research," said David Carpenter, director of the Institute of Health and Environment at the University of Albany, in testimony before the House Subcommittee on Domestic Policy.
"We must not repeat the situation we had with the relationship between smoking and lung cancer," Carpenter said.
Ronald Herberman, director of the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, said that most studies "claiming that there is no link between cell phones and brain tumors are outdated, had methodological concerns and did not include sufficient numbers of long-term cell phone users."
Many studies denying a link "defined regular cell phones as 'once a week,'" added Herberman.
"I cannot tell this committee that cell phones are definitely dangerous. But, I certainly cannot tell you that they are safe," he said.
Carpenter and Herberman both told the committee the brain cancer risk from cell phone use is far greater for children than for adults.
Herberman held up a model for lawmakers showing how radiation from a cell phone penetrates far deeper into the brain of a 5-year-old than that of an adult.
"Every child is using cell phones all of the time, and there are three billion cell phone users in the world," said Herberman.
He added that, like the messages that warn of health risks on cigarette packs, cell phones "need a precautionary message."
Noting that numerous US studies have not found a definitive cancer-phone link, Carpenter asked: "Are we at the same place we were with smoking and lung cancer 30 years ago?"
The committee were shown several European studies, particularly surveys from Scandinavia -- where the cell phone was first developed -- which show that the radiation emitted by cell phones have definite biological consequences.
For example, a 2008 study by Swedish cancer specialist Lennart Hardell found that frequent cell phone users are twice as likely to develop a benign tumor on the auditory nerves of the ear most used with the handset, compared to the other ear.
In addition, a paper published this month by the Royal Society in London found that adolescents who start using cell phones before the age of 20 were five times more likely to develop brain cancer at the age of 29 than those who didn't use a cell phone.
vernono - 26 Sep 2008 19:37 GMT change title to a couple junk Scientists warn US Congress of cancer risk for cell phone use
Mark Probert - 27 Sep 2008 02:11 GMT > Serious and concerning news from Health Lover, Ilena Rosenthal:http://ilenarose.blogspot.com
> Mobile phone use 'raises children's risk of brain cancer fivefold' > Scientists on Thursday warned US legislators of the risks of brain > cancer from cell phone use, highlighting the potential risk for > children who use mobile phones. Perhaps the problem is that parents should not allow their kids to spend so much time on the cell phone because that activity is taking away from other things, like reading, going to the library, etc. If the kids were on the phone less, they might not have to worry about any posible link to cancer.
vernono - 27 Sep 2008 03:05 GMT On Sep 25, 7:24 pm, Ilena Rose <B...@mundo.com> wrote:
> Serious and concerning news from Health Lover, Ilena > Rosenthal:http://ilenarose.blogspot.com
> Mobile phone use 'raises children's risk of brain cancer fivefold' > Scientists on Thursday warned US legislators of the risks of brain > cancer from cell phone use, highlighting the potential risk for > children who use mobile phones. Perhaps the problem is that parents should not allow their kids to spend so much time on the cell phone because that activity is taking away from other things, like reading, going to the library, etc. If the kids were on the phone less, they might not have to worry about any posible link to cancer.
BINGO
Mark Probert - 29 Sep 2008 13:30 GMT > On Sep 25, 7:24 pm, Ilena Rose <B...@mundo.com> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > BINGO On Saturday, we went to a seminar held by Empire State College. It was about their programs, on-site and online. They seem to have a very good one on line, with the support of faculty, a/k/a mentors, by phone or appointment.
One of the kids in attendance was texting the entire time, while sitting with his parents, who did nothing to stop him. His parents did nothing to stop him.
I just could not resist. After the presenters of the various programs finished, I asked them if they had a version of the program that could be done by text messaging. The kids parents woke up. Afterward, the father said, to me, that his son is addicted.
How sad.
vernono - 29 Sep 2008 20:44 GMT On Sep 26, 10:05 pm, "vernono" <vern...@there.com> wrote:
> "Mark Probert" <mark.prob...@gmail.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > BINGO On Saturday, we went to a seminar held by Empire State College. It was about their programs, on-site and online. They seem to have a very good one on line, with the support of faculty, a/k/a mentors, by phone or appointment.
One of the kids in attendance was texting the entire time, while sitting with his parents, who did nothing to stop him. His parents did nothing to stop him.
I just could not resist. After the presenters of the various programs finished, I asked them if they had a version of the program that could be done by text messaging. The kids parents woke up. Afterward, the father said, to me, that his son is addicted.
How sad.
And addicted is the proper psychological term, not to be taken lightly.
Mark Probert - 30 Sep 2008 01:53 GMT > On Sep 26, 10:05 pm, "vernono" <vern...@there.com> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > > And addicted is the proper psychological term, not to be taken lightly. Agreed. Youhave to drive in the parking lot near my office during high school lunch periods. It is a challenge not to hit one.
vernono - 30 Sep 2008 02:06 GMT On Sep 29, 3:44 pm, "vernono" <vern...@there.com> wrote:
> "Mark Probert" <mark.prob...@gmail.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > > And addicted is the proper psychological term, not to be taken lightly. Agreed. Youhave to drive in the parking lot near my office during high school lunch periods. It is a challenge not to hit one.
You avoid them?
Mark Probert - 30 Sep 2008 02:56 GMT > On Sep 29, 3:44 pm, "vernono" <vern...@there.com> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 45 lines] > > You avoid them? Do you know how much paper work I avoid by not hitting them.
And, they rot the tires.
|
|
|