> Nope. They survive DESPITE chemo. Cancer is easy to reverse, so a few
> chemo patients will survive despite the onslaught. Their survival has
> nothing to do with the chemo. Chemo reduces the survival rate.
> awthraw...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Nope. They survive DESPITE chemo. Cancer is easy to reverse, so a few
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> growth cant be easy to stop or it would have never started. I hope your
> therapy works, it sounds great, but man this stuff aint easy in any way.
While it might be hard to understand from the point of view of
knowledge or study, the ability of the body to reverse cancer is
easy...just like the body easily corrects scurvy with the consumption
of citrus.
When a person has scurvy, something HAS gone horribly wrong. Yet the
fix is wonderfully easy.
The best to you.
Kelley Eidem
J - 29 Sep 2008 03:57 GMT
> > awthraw...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > Nope. They survive DESPITE chemo. Cancer is easy to reverse, so a few
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> When a person has scurvy, something HAS gone horribly wrong. Yet the
> fix is wonderfully easy.
Cancer's not scurvy. Cancer cannot be cured with foods.
You're either crazy and/or being paid to draw people to Revici clinics.
<
http://www.cancer.org/docroot/ETO/content/ETO_5_3X_Revicis_Guided_Chemotherapy.asp
Revici himself said that his treatment might cause the area around a cancerous
tumor to become inflamed and the tumor itself to grow larger and more painful
before it shrank or disappeared."
So what/ That does not mean that the tumor cells or mass disappeared. You
were talking about palpation, in another post. That is part of diagnosing.
However appropriate treatment requires biopsy and resection (surgery to remove
the original tumor) and scans.
Revici did not have access to current scanning technology, so it seems he
assumed the cancers disappeared, based on palpation. A fatal mistake that his
patients paid for with false hope and their lives.
J
Jon Mcleod - 29 Sep 2008 12:26 GMT
>> awthraw...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> Nope. They survive DESPITE chemo. Cancer is easy to reverse, so a few
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> When a person has scurvy, something HAS gone horribly wrong. Yet the
> fix is wonderfully easy.
Wrong analogy. Scurvy is caused by a deficiency, and it goes away when
the deficiency is corrected.
A better analogy is Anthrax. It is caused by introduction of a pathogen
that grows our of control in your body. Your immune system cannot
control it. It secretes toxics and uses up energy until you die. Up
until a certain point, it is possible it infuse massive (dangerous)
doses of strong antibiotics, but after a certain point this wont help
either.
Melanoma is the same thing. The sun damages the DNA of millions of
melanocytes, like monkeys typing on a typewriter. Eventually, one
monkey types the perfect transcription and the cell reverts to a 2nd
childhood and starts spreading and multiplying like it did when it was a
stem cell and you were a fetus. I would like to see an easy fix for a
tumor that evades (and attacks) your immune system, spreads and doubles
in volume every 3 weeks, and maybe in some lucky subpopulations, there
is occasionally an easy fix. But it still doesn't look easy (or even
simple) from here.