89 percent of children's food products provide poor nutritional
quality
July 14, 2008

Nine out of ten regular food items aimed specifically at children have
a poor nutritional content – because of high levels of sugar, fat or
sodium - according to a detailed study of 367 products published in
the July issue of the UK-based journal Obesity Reviews.

Just under 70 per cent of the products studied - which specifically
excluded confectionery, soft drinks and bakery items - derived a high
proportion of calories from sugar. Approximately one in five (23 per
cent) had high fat levels and 17 per cent had high sodium levels.
Despite this, 62 per cent of the foods with poor nutritional quality
(PNQ) made positive claims about their nutritional value on the front
of the packet.

"Children's foods can now be found in virtually every section of the
supermarket and are available for every eating experience" says
Professor Charlene Elliott from the University of Calgary, Canada, and
a Trustee of the Canadian Council of Food and Nutrition.

"Parents may have questions about which packaged foods are good for
their children. Yet certain nutritional claims may add to the
confusion, as they can mislead people into thinking the whole product
is nutritious."

Only 11 per cent of the products Professor Elliott and her colleagues
evaluated provided good nutritional value in line with the criteria
laid down by the US-based Center for Science in the Public Interest
(CSPI), a non-profit agency that received the Food and Drug
Administration's highest honour in 2007.

The CSPI nutritional standards state that healthy food should not
derive more than 35 per cent of its calories from fat (excluding nuts
and seed and nut butters) and should have no more than 35 per cent
added sugar by weight. They also provide guidance on sodium levels,
ranging from 230mg per portion for snacks through to 770mg per portion
for pre-prepared meals.

CSPI's standards are adapted from those developed by the National
Alliance for Nutrition and Activity, a coalition of some 300 health
and nutrition organisations in the USA. The organisation states that
its standards represent a compromise approach. They allow for the
marketing of products that may not be nutritionally ideal, but that
provide some positive nutritional benefits that could help children
meet the US Government's Dietary Guidelines for Americans.

The 367 products included in the study were bought from a national
supermarket chain stocking 50,000 food and non-food items in December
2005. Each had to meet very specific criteria.

"We included food products and packaging that were presented in such a
way that children were the clear target audience" explains Professor
Elliott, whose research was funded by the Canadian Institutes of
Health Research. "They included products that promoted fun and play,
had a cartoon image on the front of the box or were linked to
children's films, TV programmes and merchandise."

Each product was subjected to a 36-point analysis that included the
nutritional content and how the packaging was designed to appeal to
children and their parents.

Key findings included:

-- 63 per cent of all the products surveyed made some sort of
nutritional claim, including 62 per of the products that could be
classed as poorly nutritious, due to high levels of sugar or fat or
sodium. A low percentage (eight per cent) carried some kind of
nutrition mark or seal. Other claims included that products were low
fat, a source of calcium, contained no artificial flavours or colours
or provided a number of essential nutrients.

-- Products with high sugar levels accounted for 70 per cent of the
goods with PNQ. Despite this, 68 per cent included some sort of
nutritional claim on the package, such as a source of whole grains,
source of iron or low in fat. Cereals and fruit snacks were
particularly likely to make nutritional claims and have high levels of
sugar.

-- Just under 23 per cent of the products had PNQ because of their
high fat content. Yet 37 per cent had some sort of nutritional claim
on the package. For example peanut butter mixed with chocolate claimed
to be a "source of six essential nutrients" and a pizza product
claimed to be a "source of calcium".

-- High sodium levels meant that 17 per cent of the products analysed
were classified as being of PNQ. Despite this, almost 34 per cent made
some sort of nutritional claim on the package. Crackers and pizza
products were among the worst offenders.

-- A fifth of the products featured a cartoon image engaged in some
sort of healthy physical activity on the front and a quarter showed
these on the back or side of the box. Activities included
skateboarding, basketball and biking.

"Assessing the levels of sugar in the selected food products was a
methodological challenge, because milk sugars and fruit sugars occur
naturally in foods" says Professor Elliott. "The Nutrition Facts label
only displays total sugars and the quantity of added sugars is not
always provided by the manufacturer.

"This means that the percentage of foods categorised as poorly
nutritious due to high levels of sugar is higher than it would have
been if information on naturally occurring sugars had been
available."

The problem of accurately separating figures for quantities of natural
and added sugars in manufactured products has also been encountered by
other researchers and acknowledged as an issue by CSPI, so it is not
unique to this study.

"Despite this, the findings still give us cause for concern" says
Professor Elliott. "While caregivers are likely to purchase products
that they hope their children will like, it clearly can result in a
less nutritious diet than they may realise. Having a healthy diet is
especially important given the current rates of childhood obesity."

Excess body weight affects up to 35 per cent of children across
Canada, the United States and Europe and is linked to a range of
health problems including type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, heart
disease and some forms of cancer. Overweight children can also suffer
from psychological and social consequences because of their weight.

Professor Elliott believes that policy attention needs to be directed
towards the nutritional claims made by products aimed at children and
the images they use to sell the products.

"If a parent sees a product that makes specific nutritional claims,
they may assume that the whole product is nutritious and our study has
shown that that is definitely not true in the vast majority of cases"
concludes Professor Elliott. "Using cartoon characters engaged in
sport can also create the illusion of a healthy product."

Source: Wiley

This news is brought to you by PhysOrg.com
http://www.physorg.com/news135253722.html