On Jul 15, 8:54 pm, "Jan Drew" <jdrew1...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

Seeing results such as these are very heartwarming.  I consider these
results to be “case” studies.  I do not consider them “anecdotal”,
otherwise known as information that can be safely ignored and truths
that can be denied and hidden.  How can any medical god suggest that
there is no known preventative or correct treatment for the reversal
of autism, aka mercury/aluminum poisoning?

It should be clear to all that if you want truthful medical
information, you will not get it from those with “vested” interests,
meaning pediatricians, MDs in general, the CDC, FDA, the NIH, etc.
They must tow the “official” line, patting each other on the back for
being “experts” while cashing their ill gotten gains and bathing in
the limelight of being “experts”.

If you want truthful medical information you will have to look to
scientists whose only “vested” interest is learning and standing for
the truth.  If that scientist is vilified, condemned, has his
reputation soiled, his research grants cut, then you can be assured
that scientist is standing for the truth.  You can trust his
information, “peer” reviewed or not.

DrCee
You cannot secure nor restore health with pus or poisons.

Seeing is believing, unless you are of organized medicine and the *gang* on
MHA.