>> Hmmm -- a "unified theory of autism" seems to be emerging,
>> that accounts for both the early onset and regressive
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Here is a link about a possible environmental factor:
> http://abcnews.go.com/Health/OnCall/Story?id=4857380
No, not yet. Thus the word, "emerging."
However, the genes and mechanisms involved seem to be
falling into place.
| "Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against |
| unintelligible propositions. Ideas must be distinct |
| before reason can act on them" -- Thomas Jefferson |
+-------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ---------+
Mike - 13 Jul 2008 05:26 GMT
>>> Hmmm -- a "unified theory of autism" seems to be emerging,
>>> that accounts for both the early onset and regressive
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> However, the genes and mechanisms involved seem to be
> falling into place.
There are some environmental factors triggering these genes. This is the
only explanation of the situations when an autistic boy has a
non-autistic identical twin brother. No unified theory can miss that.
D. C. Sessions - 13 Jul 2008 14:53 GMT
>>>> Hmmm -- a "unified theory of autism" seems to be emerging,
>>>> that accounts for both the early onset and regressive
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> only explanation of the situations when an autistic boy has a
> non-autistic identical twin brother. No unified theory can miss that.
Identical twins aren't. Even at the genetic level, as
it turns out. (I have more than the usual interest in
monozygotic twins, being the father of a pair.)
| "Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against |
| unintelligible propositions. Ideas must be distinct |
| before reason can act on them" -- Thomas Jefferson |
+-------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ---------+
Mike - 14 Jul 2008 03:40 GMT
>>>>> Hmmm -- a "unified theory of autism" seems to be emerging,
>>>>> that accounts for both the early onset and regressive
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> it turns out. (I have more than the usual interest in
> monozygotic twins, being the father of a pair.)
It would be interesting to find where the differences fall in such
cases. I seriously doubt they will be in these genes though.