Medical Forum / General / Alternative / June 2008
Myrl Jeffcoat is a PROVEN Liar
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Jan Drew - 19 Jun 2008 04:50 GMT http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.breast-implant/msg/e06fe90599f15e32
Subject: Why we have Jan on ASBI -
July 7 2005
Why we have Jan on ASBI - She was recruited from misc.health.alternative by Ilena
Ilena Rose Dec 31 2004, 3:59 pm show options
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative From: Ilena Rose <i...@san.rr.com> - Find messages by this author Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 17:59:40 -0600 Local: Fri, Dec 31 2004 3:59 pm Subject: Re: Test Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original
| Report Abuse On 31 Dec 2004 22:11:24 GMT, jdrew63...@aol.com (Jan) wrote:
>Newsgroups misc. health. alternative. alt. support breastimplants >Still working with crossposting. It's alt.support.breast-implant Jan ... without the s ...
and may the good Lord to continue to give you the strength to speak out against so many trying to silence you.
Some of my favorite people in the world are devout Christians ...
My personal relationship with God is different than yours ... and that certainly doesn't stop me from respecting your beliefs in any way, shape or form.
As they say in Costa Rica ... Pura Vida*
*Pure Life
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.breast-implant/msg/1f35738285f6bc21
"Myrl" <m...@jps.net> wrote in message
news:1120871488.383525.28840@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> The fact remains, had it not been for Ilena's continual sabre rattling, That never was a fact.
The FACT is, I didn't know this group existed until Mark Probert, posted on MHA.
The FACT, he did it was to stir up trouble.
It was Andy's post, for the readers of THIS newsgroup.
FACT is Myrl is a L I A R!
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.breast-implant/msg/aa906fbbbd1a034a
Subject: Why we have Jan embedded as a troll, who has never had breast implants
2005
Myrl Feb 5, 4:25 pm show options
Newsgroups: alt.support.breast-implant From: "Myrl" <m...@jps.net> - Find messages by this author Date: 5 Feb 2005 16:25:45 -0800 Local: Sat, Feb 5 2005 4:25 pm Subject: Here's why we have Jan embedded as a troll, who has never had breast implants. Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse
Here's an example of Ilena Rosenthal "encouraging" those in other Newsgroups unrelated to breast implants, to travel to this newsgroup to
troll on her behalf, while disrupting the breast implant victim community!
Ilena Rose Dec 31 2004, 3:59 pm show options
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative From: Ilena Rose <i...@san.rr.com> - Find messages by this author Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 17:59:40 -0600 Local: Fri, Dec 31 2004 3:59 pm Subject: Re: Test Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original
| Report Abuse On 31 Dec 2004 22:11:24 GMT, jdrew63...@aol.com (Jan) wrote:
>Newsgroups misc. health. alternative. alt. support breast-implants >Still working with crossposting. It's alt.support.breast-implant Jan ... without the s ...
and may the good Lord to continue to give you the strength to speak out against so many trying to silence you.
Some of my favorite people in the world are devout Christians ...
My personal relationship with God is different than yours ... and that certainly doesn't stop me from respecting your beliefs in any way, shape or form.
As they say in Costa Rica ... Pura Vida*
*Pure Life
Myrl - 19 Jun 2008 05:09 GMT > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.breast-implant/msg/e06fe90... > [quoted text clipped - 103 lines] > > *Pure Life Jan Drew has a reading comprehension problem. The message posted proves how we had Jan Drew imported into alt.support.breast-implant.
Jan Drew - 20 Jun 2008 21:36 GMT On Jun 18, 8:50 pm, "Jan Drew" <jdrew1...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.breast-implant/msg/e06fe90... > [quoted text clipped - 104 lines] > > *Pure Life Jan Drew has a reading comprehension problem. The message posted proves how we had Jan Drew imported into alt.support.breast-implant.
Wow! How many more lies do you have? What it proves is YOU, Myrl Jeffcoat are a liar.
Myrl - 22 Jun 2008 02:31 GMT > On Jun 18, 8:50 pm, "Jan Drew" <jdrew1...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 114 lines] > > - Show quoted text - No Jan - It proves you are an reading comprehension imbecile!
Jan Drew - 22 Jun 2008 04:33 GMT > "Myrl" <wisgroup_lea...@yahoo.com> wrote in message > > news:4ad594ea-2a87-4861-bbf5-32168c282df4@i36g2000prf.googlegroups.com... http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.breast-implant/msg/e06fe90...
> > Subject: Why we have Jan on ASBI - > [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > > > *Pure Life http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.breast-implant/msg/1f35738...
> > "Myrl" <m...@jps.net> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > > FACT is Myrl is a L I A R! http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.breast-implant/msg/aa906fb...
> > Subject: Why we have Jan embedded as a troll, who has never had breast > > implants [quoted text clipped - 53 lines] > > - Show quoted text - No Jan - It proves you are an reading comprehension imbecile! ----------------------------------------
Just exactly do you think is an reading comprehension? Name caller.
Jan Drew - 23 Jun 2008 00:32 GMT >> "Myrl" <wisgroup_lea...@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> [quoted text clipped - 124 lines] > Just exactly do you think is an reading comprehension? > Name caller. Still waiting for an answer.
Myrl - 23 Jun 2008 01:05 GMT > >> "Myrl" <wisgroup_lea...@yahoo.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 128 lines] > > - Show quoted text - If you can't figure that out Jan - then there is no hope for you! I'm not going to waste my time trying to explain it to you. Others understand, and that's good enough for me!
Jan Drew - 24 Jun 2008 02:13 GMT On Jun 22, 4:32 pm, "Jan Drew" <jdrew1...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> "Jan Drew" <jdrew1...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 141 lines] > > - Show quoted text - If you can't figure that out Jan - then there is no hope for you! I'm not going to waste my time trying to explain it to you. Others understand, and that's good enough for me! --------------------------- Uh huh. You cannot answer. Figure out this. It shows who is lying.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.breast-implant/msg/f45e37c07ebba9eb
Dec 31,2003
R E S O L V E D
To the readers of Alt.support.breast-implant:
Many of you have seen or read the numerous messages which go back and forth between Ilena Rosenthal, Director of the Humantics Foundation for Women, and persons she refers to as her "enemies". We, the undersigned, are certain that like us, you have grown immensely tired of this back and forth.
Therefore, as the turn of a New Year symbolizes new beginnings, we are offering the following New Year's Resolution. Commencing from the period immediately following the posting of this message, and through January 31, the undersigned posters pledge to completely ignore Ilena Rosenthal. And we mean ignore in the same spirit offered by the great non-violent peace activists: we will not not respond, no matter how provoked. We will not provoke. We will not acknowledge the presence or even existence of Ilena Rosenthal whatsoever on Usenet.
Ms. Rosenthal herself has said, "Here's another idea ... ask those attacking me to leave me alone ...have them stop telling me what to do, how to do it, and stop claiming I'm a cocaine addicted pandering whore ...and I'll have no need to defend myself. I'd happily continue posting articles, studies, links etc. as I've done for 8 years." (Message: 19faaec.0309231828.46edf...@posting.google.com)
Here is a perfect opportunity for her to finally make that promise real.
On February 1, the success of this will be assessed, and a thorough and honest accounting will be offered in the form of a brief summary report. At that time, it is up to the signatories to this resolution to decide for themselves whether or not their participation ought to be continued.
One note - this pledge does not mean that the signatories refrain from posting to Usenet, or even from a.s.b-i. It means, simply, that for the period of this point through January 31, it will be as though Ilena Rosenthal does not exist to them. They are free to post anything else, so long as it does not respond to, refer to, or in any way acknowledge Ilena Rosenthal, the Humantics Foundation, or any directly associated entities.
Thank you for your understanding of this matter. We would ask that any non-signatories not inflame the rhetoric themselves, and if you must write on this subject that it be in a moderating and reminding capacity.
Our best wishes for a happy, prosperous, productive, and peaceful New Year. Any of those not listed who are interested in participating are free to add their names at the bottom, so long as they recognize the responsibility such signing carries with it. We do not want anyone joining with us who cannot exercise the self-control necessary to engage in this civil action.
Sincerely,
Andrew M. Langer Lang...@aol.com
Coleah Penley-Ayers Col...@pacifier.com
Martha Murdock MAM-N...@prodigy.net
Myrl Jeffcoat M...@jps.net
Robert Moore OORER...@aol.com
Dr. Patrick O'Leary Mp...@aol.com
Karen S. Lawrence ParfumG...@aol.com
Suan Schaezler SusanS3...@aol.com,
Any posts by Andrew Langer are his own, written by him, for his own enjoyment (and the education of others). Unless expressly stated, they represent his own views, and not those of any other individuals or entities. He is not, nor has he ever been, paid to post here.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.breast-implant/msg/64e770361f1bca65
Jan 4,2004
Newsgroups: alt.support.breast-implant, misc.health.alternative, misc.kids.health From: "Mark ProbertJanuary 4, 2004" <MarkProbert1-4...@lumbercartel.com> Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 16:27:07 GMT Local: Sun, Jan 4 2004 12:27 pm Subject: A New Year's Resolution From: Andrew Langer (Lang...@aol.com) Subject: A New Year's Resolution View: Complete Thread (2 articles) Original Format Newsgroups: alt.support.breast-implant Date: 2003-12-31 08:03:44 PST
R E S O L V E D
To the readers of Alt.support.breast-implant:
Many of you have seen or read the numerous messages which go back and forth between Ilena Rosenthal, Director of the Humantics Foundation for Women, and persons she refers to as her "enemies". We, the undersigned, are certain that like us, you have grown immensely tired of this back and forth.
Therefore, as the turn of a New Year symbolizes new beginnings, we are offering the following New Year's Resolution. Commencing from the period immediately following the posting of this message, and through January 31, the undersigned posters pledge to completely ignore Ilena Rosenthal. And we mean ignore in the same spirit offered by the great non-violent peace activists: we will not not respond, no matter how provoked. We will not provoke. We will not acknowledge the presence or even existence of Ilena Rosenthal whatsoever on Usenet.
Ms. Rosenthal herself has said, "Here's another idea ... ask those attacking me to leave me alone ...have them stop telling me what to do, how to do it, and stop claiming I'm a cocaine addicted pandering whore ...and I'll have no need to defend myself. I'd happily continue posting articles, studies, links etc. as I've done for 8 years." (Message: 19faaec.0309231828.46edf...@posting.google.com)
Here is a perfect opportunity for her to finally make that promise real.
On February 1, the success of this will be assessed, and a thorough and honest accounting will be offered in the form of a brief summary report. At that time, it is up to the signatories to this resolution to decide for themselves whether or not their participation ought to be continued.
One note - this pledge does not mean that the signatories refrain from posting to Usenet, or even from a.s.b-i. It means, simply, that for the period of this point through January 31, it will be as though Ilena Rosenthal does not exist to them. They are free to post anything else, so long as it does not respond to, refer to, or in any way acknowledge Ilena Rosenthal, the Humantics Foundation, or any directly associated entities.
Thank you for your understanding of this matter. We would ask that any non-signatories not inflame the rhetoric themselves, and if you must write on this subject that it be in a moderating and reminding capacity.
Our best wishes for a happy, prosperous, productive, and peaceful New Year. Any of those not listed who are interested in participating are free to add their names at the bottom, so long as they recognize the responsibility such signing carries with it. We do not want anyone joining with us who cannot exercise the self-control necessary to engage in this civil action.
Sincerely,
Andrew M. Langer Lang...@aol.com
Coleah Penley-Ayers Col...@pacifier.com
Martha Murdock MAM-N...@prodigy.net
Myrl Jeffcoat M...@jps.net
Robert Moore OORER...@aol.com
Dr. Patrick O'Leary Mp...@aol.com
Karen S. Lawrence ParfumG...@aol.com
Suan Schaezler SusanS3...@aol.com,
I made this resolution severalyears ago. Unfortunately, I am still the victim of her attacks as she sees me everywhere anyone posts from AOL. I have absolutely no desire to deal with this woman, but, alas, she will not leave me alone.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.breast-implant/msg/739ac5a4f7fdd49e
Jan 4, 2004
>Subject: A New Year's Resolution >From: Andrew Langer Lang...@aol.com >Date: 12/31/2003 8:03 AM Pacific Standard Time >Message-id: <trCIb.13974$85....@www.newsranger.com>
>R E S O L V E D
>To the readers of Alt.support.breast-implant:
>Many of you have seen or read the numerous messages which go back and forth >between Ilena Rosenthal, Director of the Humantics Foundation for Women, >and >persons she refers to as her "enemies". We, the undersigned, are certain >that >like us, you have grown immensely tired of this back and forth. Then kindly leave.
Jan
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.breast-implant/msg/fc5af458ddef0ec1
Newsgroups: alt.support.breast-implant From: aloysio...@aol.com (AloysiousX) Date: 06 Jan 2004 17:54:38 GMT Local: Tues, Jan 6 2004 1:54 pm Subject: Re: A New Year's
>Jan "The Provacateuse" ... this one cracked me up! Then you are obviously easily amused.
Even though Andrew and others have made the spirit in which they made their New Year's Resolution clear, others feel the need to weigh in inappropriately.
It is fairly obvious to me that Jan was trying to provoke one of the signers into breaking their promise, just as it is obvious to me that you are doing the same thing, Sistah Ilena.
There is something that you say below that I find extremely provocative.
>Andy's arrogance has reached new depths ... as well as his misusing >this french word for "provoker." Are we to now believe that you are an expert in french, Sistah?
I thought it was fairly clear (and clever) that rather than call Jan a "provocateur", which would be incorrect given her gender, he called her a "provocateuse", which was gender-correct. Rather PC of him. Certainly accurate.
It's a nicer word than "provoker," don't you think?
>"Provacateuse" ... Junk Science$peak for daring to respond to a >thread where Junk Science Flack Andy (Andrew M. Langer) was calling >his troups together! You get a little touchy when people publicly announce that they want nothing to do with you, don't you, Sistah Ilena?
>Andy and Aloysisius/Marla/Probert have longed worked threads in tandem >... especially when they are about me ... (who Andy is "ignoring" of >course and won't even read this note if he is being honest)... Well, my only intersection with Langer and Probert has been regarding you, Sistah Ilena. I've never even spoken with Probert, though you claim that he and I are the same person.
Apparently it is just another unsupported accusation made by Sistah Ilena Rosenthal.
>After Andy and failed silicone manufacturer O'leary and Dow Corning >Dave (his Daddy and he both have been on the silicone gravy train) and >the "educated" so called "silicone support leaders" (Dow's Networks as >discussed in their memo from 1992, see below)
>www.humanticsfoundation.com/myrl.html#networks
>pledged their allegiance to ignore me ...
>and Marla Probert distributed this further to other of his groups he >fills with Quack$peak for Barrett etc. ...
>and Jan dared to respond ... With a provoking statement. She didn't have to say anything at all, but if she was posting to elicit a response on the subject, she was acting in a provoking capacity.
>Andy posted his verse below ... apparently ignorant that he was the >provoker ... not Jan. My dictionary defines "provoker" as "someone who deliberately foments trouble." Posting a statement that you are going to ignore someone isn't one of provocation, as it isn't made to "foment trouble." The statement was posted explicitly to avoid trouble and alleviate trouble.
Isn't it funny how someone who just accused someone else of misusing a word has now been shown to have been misusing a word herself?
>Both Andy and Probert "reach out" to posters who don't go with their >"program" in their attempts to "educate" them ... I just found a >couple of messages from women telling me how after they posted here >... Andy wrote them trying to "educate" them of how bad I am (LOL) ... >nice job he has! This is the provactive statement I referred to above, Sistah Ilena. It is clearly provocative to make an accusation that someone has gone behind someone else's back to undermine their credibility and then not post any proof to support that accusation, especially when the accused person has sworn not to respond, and is thus unable to defend himself.
This is the kind of tactic you keep in your arsenal, and one of the reasons why I could in good conscience no longer support you.
So now I ask you, because Brother Langer cannot, to please share with us your proof of this accusation. Please, Sistah Ilena. I would like to see the e-mails that Brother Langer sent to these women.
As Salaam Aleikum, my Sistah!
AloysiousX
**** That is Mark S Probert, Merrick,
FACT he lied.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.breast-implant/msg/822d45733f1b6cde
Jan 6, 2004
You know something, Sistah Ilena, I'm not Mark Probert
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.health.alternative/msg/9b161d56a494463d
Jun 7. 2008
ath: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!washdc3-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!ngpeer.news.aol.com!audrey-m2.news.aol.com!not-for-mail Lines: 107 X-Admin: n...@aol.com From: aloysio...@aol.com (AloysiousX) Newsgroups: alt.support.breast-implant Date: 06 Jan 2004 17:54:38 GMT References: <19faaec.0401060908.68a7f0f@posting.google.com> Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com Subject: Re: A New Year's Resolution Message-ID: 20040106125438.01826.00002310@mb-m18.aol.com
> Subj: Is There Some Reason...> Date: 2/12/2004 2:18:07 PM Pacific Standard > Time> From: AloysiousX> To: JDrew63929>>> Is there some reason why you [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > guess not.>>> As Salaam Aleikum!>>> Aloysious> > Mark Probert markprobert1...@hotmail.com AloysiousX Myrl - 24 Jun 2008 03:39 GMT |________________|___________________________________| 0 20 40 60 80 100 JAN DREW TROLL-O-METER
Jan Drew - 24 Jun 2008 04:07 GMT > |________________|___________________________________| > 0 20 40 60 80 100 > JAN DREW TROLL-O-METER lol.
Myrl Jeffcoat cannot answer because she LIED
"Myrl" <wisgroup_leader@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:5ab7242c-e893-44f6-9833-bb6eeb2e46ee@d19g2000prm.googlegroups.com... On Jun 22, 4:32 pm, "Jan Drew" <jdrew1...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> "Jan Drew" <jdrew1...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 142 lines] > > - Show quoted text - If you can't figure that out Jan - then there is no hope for you! I'm not going to waste my time trying to explain it to you. Others understand, and that's good enough for me! --------------------------- Uh huh. You cannot answer. Figure out this. It shows who is lying.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.breast-implant/msg/f45e37c07ebba9eb
Dec 31,2003
R E S O L V E D
To the readers of Alt.support.breast-implant:
Many of you have seen or read the numerous messages which go back and forth between Ilena Rosenthal, Director of the Humantics Foundation for Women, and persons she refers to as her "enemies". We, the undersigned, are certain that like us, you have grown immensely tired of this back and forth.
Therefore, as the turn of a New Year symbolizes new beginnings, we are offering the following New Year's Resolution. Commencing from the period immediately following the posting of this message, and through January 31, the undersigned posters pledge to completely ignore Ilena Rosenthal. And we mean ignore in the same spirit offered by the great non-violent peace activists: we will not not respond, no matter how provoked. We will not provoke. We will not acknowledge the presence or even existence of Ilena Rosenthal whatsoever on Usenet.
Ms. Rosenthal herself has said, "Here's another idea ... ask those attacking me to leave me alone ...have them stop telling me what to do, how to do it, and stop claiming I'm a cocaine addicted pandering whore ...and I'll have no need to defend myself. I'd happily continue posting articles, studies, links etc. as I've done for 8 years." (Message: 19faaec.0309231828.46edf...@posting.google.com)
Here is a perfect opportunity for her to finally make that promise real.
On February 1, the success of this will be assessed, and a thorough and honest accounting will be offered in the form of a brief summary report. At that time, it is up to the signatories to this resolution to decide for themselves whether or not their participation ought to be continued.
One note - this pledge does not mean that the signatories refrain from posting to Usenet, or even from a.s.b-i. It means, simply, that for the period of this point through January 31, it will be as though Ilena Rosenthal does not exist to them. They are free to post anything else, so long as it does not respond to, refer to, or in any way acknowledge Ilena Rosenthal, the Humantics Foundation, or any directly associated entities.
Thank you for your understanding of this matter. We would ask that any non-signatories not inflame the rhetoric themselves, and if you must write on this subject that it be in a moderating and reminding capacity.
Our best wishes for a happy, prosperous, productive, and peaceful New Year. Any of those not listed who are interested in participating are free to add their names at the bottom, so long as they recognize the responsibility such signing carries with it. We do not want anyone joining with us who cannot exercise the self-control necessary to engage in this civil action.
Sincerely,
Andrew M. Langer Lang...@aol.com
Coleah Penley-Ayers Col...@pacifier.com
Martha Murdock MAM-N...@prodigy.net
Myrl Jeffcoat M...@jps.net
Robert Moore OORER...@aol.com
Dr. Patrick O'Leary Mp...@aol.com
Karen S. Lawrence ParfumG...@aol.com
Suan Schaezler SusanS3...@aol.com,
Any posts by Andrew Langer are his own, written by him, for his own enjoyment (and the education of others). Unless expressly stated, they represent his own views, and not those of any other individuals or entities. He is not, nor has he ever been, paid to post here.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.breast-implant/msg/64e770361f1bca65
Jan 4,2004
Newsgroups: alt.support.breast-implant, misc.health.alternative, misc.kids.health From: "Mark ProbertJanuary 4, 2004" <MarkProbert1-4...@lumbercartel.com> Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 16:27:07 GMT Local: Sun, Jan 4 2004 12:27 pm Subject: A New Year's Resolution From: Andrew Langer (Lang...@aol.com) Subject: A New Year's Resolution View: Complete Thread (2 articles) Original Format Newsgroups: alt.support.breast-implant Date: 2003-12-31 08:03:44 PST
R E S O L V E D
To the readers of Alt.support.breast-implant:
Many of you have seen or read the numerous messages which go back and forth between Ilena Rosenthal, Director of the Humantics Foundation for Women, and persons she refers to as her "enemies". We, the undersigned, are certain that like us, you have grown immensely tired of this back and forth.
Therefore, as the turn of a New Year symbolizes new beginnings, we are offering the following New Year's Resolution. Commencing from the period immediately following the posting of this message, and through January 31, the undersigned posters pledge to completely ignore Ilena Rosenthal. And we mean ignore in the same spirit offered by the great non-violent peace activists: we will not not respond, no matter how provoked. We will not provoke. We will not acknowledge the presence or even existence of Ilena Rosenthal whatsoever on Usenet.
Ms. Rosenthal herself has said, "Here's another idea ... ask those attacking me to leave me alone ...have them stop telling me what to do, how to do it, and stop claiming I'm a cocaine addicted pandering whore ...and I'll have no need to defend myself. I'd happily continue posting articles, studies, links etc. as I've done for 8 years." (Message: 19faaec.0309231828.46edf...@posting.google.com)
Here is a perfect opportunity for her to finally make that promise real.
On February 1, the success of this will be assessed, and a thorough and honest accounting will be offered in the form of a brief summary report. At that time, it is up to the signatories to this resolution to decide for themselves whether or not their participation ought to be continued.
One note - this pledge does not mean that the signatories refrain from posting to Usenet, or even from a.s.b-i. It means, simply, that for the period of this point through January 31, it will be as though Ilena Rosenthal does not exist to them. They are free to post anything else, so long as it does not respond to, refer to, or in any way acknowledge Ilena Rosenthal, the Humantics Foundation, or any directly associated entities.
Thank you for your understanding of this matter. We would ask that any non-signatories not inflame the rhetoric themselves, and if you must write on this subject that it be in a moderating and reminding capacity.
Our best wishes for a happy, prosperous, productive, and peaceful New Year. Any of those not listed who are interested in participating are free to add their names at the bottom, so long as they recognize the responsibility such signing carries with it. We do not want anyone joining with us who cannot exercise the self-control necessary to engage in this civil action.
Sincerely,
Andrew M. Langer Lang...@aol.com
Coleah Penley-Ayers Col...@pacifier.com
Martha Murdock MAM-N...@prodigy.net
Myrl Jeffcoat M...@jps.net
Robert Moore OORER...@aol.com
Dr. Patrick O'Leary Mp...@aol.com
Karen S. Lawrence ParfumG...@aol.com
Suan Schaezler SusanS3...@aol.com,
I made this resolution severalyears ago. Unfortunately, I am still the victim of her attacks as she sees me everywhere anyone posts from AOL. I have absolutely no desire to deal with this woman, but, alas, she will not leave me alone.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.breast-implant/msg/739ac5a4f7fdd49e
Jan 4, 2004
>Subject: A New Year's Resolution >From: Andrew Langer Lang...@aol.com >Date: 12/31/2003 8:03 AM Pacific Standard Time >Message-id: <trCIb.13974$85....@www.newsranger.com>
>R E S O L V E D
>To the readers of Alt.support.breast-implant:
>Many of you have seen or read the numerous messages which go back and forth >between Ilena Rosenthal, Director of the Humantics Foundation for Women, >and >persons she refers to as her "enemies". We, the undersigned, are certain >that >like us, you have grown immensely tired of this back and forth. Then kindly leave.
Jan
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.breast-implant/msg/fc5af458ddef0ec1
Newsgroups: alt.support.breast-implant From: aloysio...@aol.com (AloysiousX) Date: 06 Jan 2004 17:54:38 GMT Local: Tues, Jan 6 2004 1:54 pm Subject: Re: A New Year's
>Jan "The Provacateuse" ... this one cracked me up! Then you are obviously easily amused.
Even though Andrew and others have made the spirit in which they made their New Year's Resolution clear, others feel the need to weigh in inappropriately.
It is fairly obvious to me that Jan was trying to provoke one of the signers into breaking their promise, just as it is obvious to me that you are doing the same thing, Sistah Ilena.
There is something that you say below that I find extremely provocative.
>Andy's arrogance has reached new depths ... as well as his misusing >this french word for "provoker." Are we to now believe that you are an expert in french, Sistah?
I thought it was fairly clear (and clever) that rather than call Jan a "provocateur", which would be incorrect given her gender, he called her a "provocateuse", which was gender-correct. Rather PC of him. Certainly accurate.
It's a nicer word than "provoker," don't you think?
>"Provacateuse" ... Junk Science$peak for daring to respond to a >thread where Junk Science Flack Andy (Andrew M. Langer) was calling >his troups together! You get a little touchy when people publicly announce that they want nothing to do with you, don't you, Sistah Ilena?
>Andy and Aloysisius/Marla/Probert have longed worked threads in tandem >... especially when they are about me ... (who Andy is "ignoring" of >course and won't even read this note if he is being honest)... Well, my only intersection with Langer and Probert has been regarding you, Sistah Ilena. I've never even spoken with Probert, though you claim that he and I are the same person.
Apparently it is just another unsupported accusation made by Sistah Ilena Rosenthal.
>After Andy and failed silicone manufacturer O'leary and Dow Corning >Dave (his Daddy and he both have been on the silicone gravy train) and >the "educated" so called "silicone support leaders" (Dow's Networks as >discussed in their memo from 1992, see below)
>www.humanticsfoundation.com/myrl.html#networks
>pledged their allegiance to ignore me ...
>and Marla Probert distributed this further to other of his groups he >fills with Quack$peak for Barrett etc. ...
>and Jan dared to respond ... With a provoking statement. She didn't have to say anything at all, but if she was posting to elicit a response on the subject, she was acting in a provoking capacity.
>Andy posted his verse below ... apparently ignorant that he was the >provoker ... not Jan. My dictionary defines "provoker" as "someone who deliberately foments trouble." Posting a statement that you are going to ignore someone isn't one of provocation, as it isn't made to "foment trouble." The statement was posted explicitly to avoid trouble and alleviate trouble.
Isn't it funny how someone who just accused someone else of misusing a word has now been shown to have been misusing a word herself?
>Both Andy and Probert "reach out" to posters who don't go with their >"program" in their attempts to "educate" them ... I just found a >couple of messages from women telling me how after they posted here >... Andy wrote them trying to "educate" them of how bad I am (LOL) ... >nice job he has! This is the provactive statement I referred to above, Sistah Ilena. It is clearly provocative to make an accusation that someone has gone behind someone else's back to undermine their credibility and then not post any proof to support that accusation, especially when the accused person has sworn not to respond, and is thus unable to defend himself.
This is the kind of tactic you keep in your arsenal, and one of the reasons why I could in good conscience no longer support you.
So now I ask you, because Brother Langer cannot, to please share with us your proof of this accusation. Please, Sistah Ilena. I would like to see the e-mails that Brother Langer sent to these women.
As Salaam Aleikum, my Sistah!
AloysiousX
**** That is Mark S Probert, Merrick,
FACT he lied.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.breast-implant/msg/822d45733f1b6cde
Jan 6, 2004
You know something, Sistah Ilena, I'm not Mark Probert
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.health.alternative/msg/9b161d56a494463d
Jun 7. 2008
path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!washdc3-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!ngpeer.news.aol.com!audrey-m2.news.aol.com!not-for-mail Lines: 107 X-Admin: n...@aol.com From: aloysio...@aol.com (AloysiousX) Newsgroups: alt.support.breast-implant Date: 06 Jan 2004 17:54:38 GMT References: <19faaec.0401060908.68a7f0f@posting.google.com> Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com Subject: Re: A New Year's Resolution Message-ID: 20040106125438.01826.00002310@mb-m18.aol.com
> Subj: Is There Some Reason...> Date: 2/12/2004 2:18:07 PM Pacific Standard > Time> From: AloysiousX> To: JDrew63929>>> Is there some reason why you [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > guess not.>>> As Salaam Aleikum!>>> Aloysious> > Mark Probert markprobert1...@hotmail.com AloysiousX ============================== Mark Probert doesn't lie--now--does he, Myrl Jeffcoat? Now, don't forget to answer. Another Jan Drew Troll-o Meter is not an an answer. Btw, look on the words internet Troll.
Myrl - 24 Jun 2008 06:02 GMT |________________|_________________________| 0 20 40 60 80 100 JAN DREW TROLL-O-METER
Jan Drew - 24 Jun 2008 19:25 GMT > |________________|_________________________| > 0 20 40 60 80 100 > JAN DREW TROLL-O-METER Grow up. It is noted you refuse to answer, did Mark Probert lie? Both you and he are* proven* liars.
Myrl - 24 Jun 2008 23:38 GMT |________________|_________________________| 0 20 40 60 80 100 JAN DREW TROLL-O-METER
Jan Drew - 24 Jun 2008 19:20 GMT >> |________________|___________________________________| >> 0 20 40 60 80 100 [quoted text clipped - 591 lines] > Now, don't forget to answer. Another Jan Drew Troll-o Meter > is not an an answer. Btw, look on the words internet Troll.
|
|
|