Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Alternative / June 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Acupuncture and knee osteoarthritis

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Richard Schultz - 15 Jun 2008 12:00 GMT
While the following article will be of no interest whatsoever to Andrew
Kingoff, people who actually want to know whether acupuncture is effective
or not may find the following article worthe reading:

"Acupuncture as an adjunct to exercise based physiotherapy for
osteoarthritis of the knee: randomised controlled trial," N.E. Foster
et al., British Medical Journal vol. 335, p. 436 (2007), available online
(http://tinyurl.com/66ffgq).  

In this study, the experimenters investigated the effect of adding
acupuncture or sham acupuncture (using needles that retract into the body
of the needle rather than piercing the skin) to physical therapy for
osteoarthritis of the knee.  Their conclusion was "The addition of
acupuncture to a course of advice and exercise for osteoarthritis of the
knee delivered by physiotherapists provided no additional improvement in
pain scores."

-----
Richard Schultz                              schultr@mail.biu.ac.il
Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----
"It's certainly easy to mock things," agreed Trefusis.  "Oddly enough
though I've never found it easy to mock anything of value.  Only things
that are tawdry and fatuous -- perhaps it's just me."
The One True Zhen Jue - 15 Jun 2008 13:20 GMT
> While the following article will be of no interest whatsoever to Andrew
> Kingoff, people who actually want to know whether acupuncture is effective
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> knee delivered by physiotherapists provided no additional improvement in
> pain scores."

http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abridged/329/7476/1216?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10
&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=acupuncture+osteoarthritis+&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=0&reso
urcetype=HWCIT


Results 88 patients completed the trial. In the intention to treat
analysis, the WOMAC index presented a greater reduction in the
intervention group than in the control group (mean difference 23.9,
95% confidence interval 15.0 to 32.8) The reduction was greater in the
subscale of functional activity. The same result was observed in the
pain visual analogue scale, with a reduction of 26.6 (18.5 to 34.8).
The PQLC results indicate that acupuncture treatment produces
significant changes in physical capability (P = 0.021) and
psychological functioning (P = 0.046). Three patients reported
bruising after the acupuncture sessions.

Conclusions Acupuncture plus diclofenac is more effective than placebo
acupuncture plus diclofenac for the symptomatic treatment of
osteoarthritis of the knee.
Richard Schultz - 15 Jun 2008 13:51 GMT
:> While the following article will be of no interest whatsoever to Andrew
:> Kingoff, people who actually want to know whether acupuncture is effective
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
:> et al., British Medical Journal vol. 335, p. 436 (2007), available online
:> (http://tinyurl.com/66ffgq). ?

And I was right:  Andrew Kingoff refuses to read, or even to acknowledge
the existence, of the above-referenced article.

-----
Richard Schultz                              schultr@mail.biu.ac.il
Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----
"It's certainly easy to mock things," agreed Trefusis.  "Oddly enough
though I've never found it easy to mock anything of value.  Only things
that are tawdry and fatuous -- perhaps it's just me."
Citizen Jimserac - 15 Jun 2008 18:55 GMT
Doc Rich, you should be made aware that there is a long
history of misrepresenting tests in alternative
medicine as a means to false claims that they don't work.

Regarding osteoarthritis, for example,
a famous test with totally negative results
for Homeopathy was done and published in Lancet
in 1983.  Three drugs were used, Rhus Tox for the
Homeo drug, fenoprofen (an analgesic) and a placebo
and given to three different groups.
The homeopathy and placebo groups were beaten
soundly by fenoprofen.

Problem is, feneprofen is a fast acting analgesic
and the Homeopathy medications take longer to do
their stuff.  Also, this kind of test stacks
the odds against Homeopathy by forcing the use
of a single Homeoapthic remedy when in actuality
several might have been used to individualize them
for each patient.  Last but not least, Rhus Tox
is a Homeopathic remedy for RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS,
not osteoarthritis (speaking in general).

So you presenting some test which shows negative
results about anything is pretty worthless here.
IT IS clear now, that your arguments, like that
of all denialists, unfortunately rely on selective
focus, misrepresentation, or other alteration
of reality to suit your particular denial.

You are welcome to continue your charade but
by now pretty much every one is on to it.
Impresses the newcomers though.

Citizen Jimserac
D. C. Sessions - 15 Jun 2008 19:09 GMT
> Doc Rich, you should be made aware that there is a long
> history of misrepresenting tests in alternative
> medicine as a means to false claims that they don't work.

Therefore, all negative results are to be dismissed out
of hand.  What remains should be averaged and if the
average is positive constitutes positive PROOF of the
efficacy of homeopathy!

Tell us, do, whether there is any conceivable set of
facts which would convince you that homeopathy is bunk?

| "Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against |
|  unintelligible propositions. Ideas must be distinct   |
|  before reason can act on them" -- Thomas Jefferson    |
+-------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ---------+
Citizen Jimserac - 15 Jun 2008 20:03 GMT
> In message <308c8530-d21f-4105-ac90-e63c93b27...@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com>, Citizen Jimserac wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Tell us, do, whether there is any conceivable set of
> facts which would convince you that homeopathy is bunk?

Yes, people stop seeing Homeopathic doctors.

Has not happened in 200 years.  NEVER WILL.

Citizen Jimserac
P.S. It works; I don't know HOW it
works, but... it works.
D. C. Sessions - 15 Jun 2008 20:40 GMT
>> In message <308c8530-d21f-4105-ac90-e63c93b27...@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com>, Citizen Jimserac wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Has not happened in 200 years.  NEVER WILL.

So you base your opinion of the validity of healing
arts purely on popularity?

| "Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against |
|  unintelligible propositions. Ideas must be distinct   |
|  before reason can act on them" -- Thomas Jefferson    |
+-------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ---------+
Jan Drew - 15 Jun 2008 23:18 GMT
> In message
> <2ea3a04f-e688-44d5-b17f-8620b9d6fa07@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> So you base your opinion of the validity of healing
> arts purely on popularity?

P.S. It works; I don't know HOW it
works, but... it works.

> | "Ridicule
Citizen Jimserac - 16 Jun 2008 11:55 GMT
> > In message
> > <2ea3a04f-e688-44d5-b17f-8620b9d6f...@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> > --
> > | "Ridicule

You will note in passing the apparently purposeful misrepresentation
of Homeopathy disease theory by D.C.
The mindless denialist is most at home discussing theories and leaving
the true purpose of healing - the restoration of health of living
beings, unmentioned.

Innuendo, misrepresentation and ridicule are their
mode and modus. The thought of people
successfully getting cured by alternative methods
infuriates them and their denialism requires that they claim it was
all a trick, placebo, did not happen or otherwise
deny reality, even when research shows otherwise.

As additional proof of this, observe the failure of the denialists to
barely acknowledge or criticize the obviously out of control
pharmaceutical industry, with their killer Vioxes and baby deforming
Thalidomides.   Observe their lack of interest when "tests" are done
on St. John's Wort and negative results are found, except that an
inactive form of the herb was used for the "tests".

We have here the opportunity to witness the attempt at medicalist
totalitarian thinking in which one and only one "standard" medicine
will be forced on populations, if they had their way.
This dangerous and fascistic anti-science and anti-human
philosophy is encouraged by none other than the very
same corporatist philosophy dares to elevate themselves above
governments and individual choice in their outrageous attempt
at forced "benevolence", irrespective of all "side effects" as a
justification for obscene profiteering.

Citizen Jimserac
Homeopathy Pills do NOTHING but their "side effect"
is to cure the patient.
David Wright - 17 Jun 2008 04:09 GMT
>> In message
><308c8530-d21f-4105-ac90-e63c93b27...@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>P.S. It works; I don't know HOW it
>works, but... it works.

Just like astrology, which is at least as popular!

 -- David Wright :: alphabeta at copper.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "There are two kinds of Republicans:  millionaires and suckers."
                                                     -- John Dolan
Citizen Jimserac - 17 Jun 2008 10:23 GMT
> In article <2ea3a04f-e688-44d5-b17f-8620b9d6f...@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
> CitizenJimserac <Jimse...@gmail.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Just like astrology, which is at least as popular!

And chemotherapy!

Citizen Jimserac
Richard Schultz - 17 Jun 2008 12:24 GMT
:> Just like astrology, which is at least as popular!

: And chemotherapy!

And yet so many of us continue to fail to recognize him as the Genius of
the Millenium.

-----
Richard Schultz                              schultr@mail.biu.ac.il
Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----
"Apparently, you take me for a complete fool."
"Yeah -- more or less."
                Bob & Ray, "Garish Summit"
Richard Schultz - 18 Jun 2008 06:44 GMT
:> Tell us, do, whether there is any conceivable set of
:> facts which would convince you that homeopathy is bunk?
:>
: Yes, people stop seeing Homeopathic doctors.
:
: Has not happened in 200 years.  NEVER WILL.

People have been going to astrologers for something more like 4000 years.
Does that prove that astrology is not bunk?

-----
Richard Schultz                              schultr@mail.biu.ac.il
Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----
"Contrariwise," continued Tweedledee, "if it was so, it might be, and
if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't.  That's logic."
Citizen Jimserac - 28 Jun 2008 00:18 GMT
> In article <2ea3a04f-e688-44d5-b17f-8620b9d6f...@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>, CitizenJimserac<Jimse...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> -----

I don't know, haven't consulted my horoscope for today.

Citizen Jimserac
vernono - 28 Jun 2008 00:43 GMT
>> In article
>> <2ea3a04f-e688-44d5-b17f-8620b9d6f...@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> I don't know, haven't consulted my horoscope for today.

Of course you have ZERO idea of what homeopahy is.

FYI
Mental calming and concentration works for many people.
Concentration on astrology, time of year and other moon conditions DO effect
people.

Studies have shown that some who become totally obsessed with saying
homeopathy doesn't work can be helped with mental care.  Imagine being
obsessed with such a subject.  Just lying outside and staring at the stars
(at night) can get some people over obsessive behaviour.
> Citizen Jimserac
Cal I Fornicate - 28 Jun 2008 01:37 GMT
>>> In article
>>> <2ea3a04f-e688-44d5-b17f-8620b9d6f...@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> Studies have shown that some who become totally obsessed with saying
> homeopathy doesn't work can be helped with mental care.

Studies have shown that all women who fell pregnant in the last five
years were once virgins. Alternative logic therefore concludes that
virginity causes babies.

> Imagine being
> obsessed with such a subject.  Just lying outside and staring at the stars
> (at night) can get some people over obsessive behaviour.

Depending where they are lying, it might get them run over too.

Cal
Jan Drew - 28 Jun 2008 03:50 GMT
>>> In article
>>> <2ea3a04f-e688-44d5-b17f-8620b9d6f...@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Of course you have ZERO idea of what homeopahy is.

http://www.adhom.com/adh_download/EVIDENCE_9.0_Sept_06.pdf
Citizen Jimserac - 28 Jun 2008 19:32 GMT
> "CitizenJimserac" <Jimse...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> > CitizenJimserac

Here is a link to some EVIDENCE, sorry no stars!
http://www.adhom.com/adh_download/EVIDENCE_9.0_Sept_06.pdf

Citizen Jimserac
Citizen Jimserac - 28 Jun 2008 19:33 GMT
> "CitizenJimserac" <Jimse...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> > CitizenJimserac

http://www.adhom.com/adh_download/EVIDENCE_9.0_Sept_06.pdf

Citizen Jimsera
Jan Drew - 15 Jun 2008 23:15 GMT
> In message
> <308c8530-d21f-4105-ac90-e63c93b27667@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com>,

The correct way to post so all readers can read what exactly was posted.

> On Jun 15, 8:51 am, schu...@mail.biu.ack.il (Richard Schultz) wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>
> Citizen Jimserac

>> Doc Rich, you should be made aware that there is a long
>> history of misrepresenting tests in alternative
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Tell us, do, whether there is any conceivable set of
> facts which would convince you that homeopathy is bunk?

Tell us, do, why you post incorrectly?
Richard Schultz - 15 Jun 2008 20:39 GMT
: Doc Rich, you should be made aware that there is a long
: history of misrepresenting tests in alternative
: medicine as a means to false claims that they don't work.

Have you read the article in question?  Can you point to any evidence
that any false claims were made?  I didn't think so.

You do know that there is a long history of misrepresenting tests in
alternative medicine as a means to false claims that they *do* work,
don't you?  Oh wait, I forgot.  You refuse to acknowledge the existence
of any evidence that might contradict your preconceived notions.  Forget I
asked.

-----
Richard Schultz                              schultr@mail.biu.ac.il
Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----
"You don't even have a clue about which clue you're missing."
Jan Drew - 15 Jun 2008 23:22 GMT
"Richard Schultz" <schultr@mail.biu.ack.il> wrote in message:

> Forget I
> asked.

Good idea, better yet, forget anything you post.
WE know what you are missing.
Try a treatment of acupuncture.

> -----
> Richard Schultz                              schultr@mail.biu.ac.il
> Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
> Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
> -----
> "You don't even have a clue about which clue you're missing."
Jan Drew - 15 Jun 2008 23:08 GMT
> Doc Rich, you should be made aware that there is a long
> history of misrepresenting tests in alternative
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> Citizen Jimserac

Agreed.  Anyone can read *This document has been changed since it was
created.*
Contact the author of original version of this document.
Jan Drew - 15 Jun 2008 22:56 GMT
> In article
> <ad3a51a5-3c0b-4cd9-b4d3-bd12cea1428c@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>, The
> One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_Kingoff@yahoo.com> wrote:

> While the following article will be of no interest whatsoever to Andrew
> Kingoff, people who actually want to know whether acupuncture is effective
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> knee delivered by physiotherapists provided no additional improvement in
> pain scores."

http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abridged/329/7476/1216?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10
&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=acupuncture+osteoarthritis+&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=0&reso
urcetype=HWCIT


Results 88 patients completed the trial. In the intention to treat
analysis, the WOMAC index presented a greater reduction in the
intervention group than in the control group (mean difference 23.9,
95% confidence interval 15.0 to 32.8) The reduction was greater in the
subscale of functional activity. The same result was observed in the
pain visual analogue scale, with a reduction of 26.6 (18.5 to 34.8).
The PQLC results indicate that acupuncture treatment produces
significant changes in physical capability (P = 0.021) and
psychological functioning (P = 0.046). Three patients reported
bruising after the acupuncture sessions.

Conclusions Acupuncture plus diclofenac is more effective than placebo
acupuncture plus diclofenac for the symptomatic treatment of
osteoarthritis of the knee.

> :> While the following article will be of no interest whatsoever to Andrew
> :> Kingoff, people who actually want to know whether acupuncture is
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> And I was right:  Andrew Kingoff refuses to read, or even to acknowledge
> the existence, of the above-referenced article.

And you just lied again.

> -----
> Richard Schultz
Who IS wrong anf LIES repeatedly.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.