> In article <08190f78-edd9-4e87-93f9-97ff1b572...@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>, CitizenJimserac<Jimse...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> : Oh darn it! Poor Richard will have to respond to this
>
> No he won't.
> > In article <08190f78-edd9-4e87-93f9-97ff1b572...@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>, CitizenJimserac<Jimse...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> But... But.... YOU JUST DID RESPOND!!
Shhhh! You're intruding on his cone of denial.
> You did!
>
> Citizen Jimserac
Citizen Jimserac - 14 Jun 2008 11:52 GMT
On Jun 13, 3:38 pm, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> On Jun 13, 2:56 pm, CitizenJimserac<Jimse...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> > CitizenJimserac
Is it some sort of logic distortion field that emerges from his posts
such
that he can be self referentially contradictory and it's OK?
Mysterious.
CJ
:> In article <08190f78-edd9-4e87-93f9-97ff1b572...@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>, CitizenJimserac<Jimse...@gmail.com> wrote:
:> : Oh darn it! Poor Richard will have to respond to this
:> No he won't.
: But... But.... YOU JUST DID RESPOND!!
I didn't say that he wouldn't respond to it, only that he wouldn't have to.
-----
Richard Schultz schultr@mail.biu.ac.il
Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----
"Contrariwise," continued Tweedledee, "if it was so, it might be, and
if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic."
Citizen Jimserac - 15 Jun 2008 11:54 GMT
> In article <42d9f87a-cf50-4f78-9ad3-76a89c2e3...@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, CitizenJimserac<Jimse...@gmail.com> wrote:
> :> In article <08190f78-edd9-4e87-93f9-97ff1b572...@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>, CitizenJimserac<Jimse...@gmail.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> I didn't say that he wouldn't respond to it, only that he wouldn't have to.
Oh!!! Thank goodness!!! You had me worried for a moment there.
Citizen Jimserac
Jan Drew - 16 Jun 2008 02:36 GMT
> In article
> <42d9f87a-cf50-4f78-9ad3-76a89c2e3600@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> I didn't say that he wouldn't respond to it, only that he wouldn't have
> to.
Richard just lied AGAIN!
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.health.alternative/msg/97c7fa5b19513671
Jun 13 2008
In article
<08190f78-edd9-4e87-93f9-97ff1b572...@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>, Citizen
Jimserac <Jimse...@gmail.com> wrote:
: Oh darn it! Poor Richard will have to respond to this
No he won't.
> -----
> Richard Schultz