Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Alternative / June 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Bridget Robb Can't Take Legal Action Because Device Was FDA-Approved

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Myrl - 11 Jun 2008 16:07 GMT
Bridget Robb Can't Take Legal Action Because Device Was FDA-Approved
By YUNJI DeNIES, SHEILA EVANS and STEPHANIE DAHLE
June 11, 2008

As her 6-year-old daughter watched in horror, Bridget Robb screamed in
pain.

"Am I dying?" Robb asked the 911 operator. "I'm young. I don't wanna
die."

On Dec. 17, 2007, Robb's implanted defibrillator malfunctioned,
shocking her heart a total of 31 times in the span of a few minutes.

During the seven-minute phone call, Robb was shocked 11 times.

The single mother pleaded with the operator to send help quickly.

"You don't understand how this hurts," Robb, 34, screamed with each
shock. "God, please don't take me."

"Mommy's dying," her daughter said as she hugged her cat, helplessly
watching her mother writhe in agony.

A faulty wire caused the malfunction under her skin, which meant Robb
feel like she was being repeatedly electrocuted.

Making matters worse, when she got to the Pennsylvania hospital, Robb
found out the defibrillator had been voluntarily recalled two months
earlier.

"It was the worst day of my life," Robb told ABC News. "It was just
horrific."

Though she survived the horror, she has had two surgeries to correct
the problem and a blood transfusion, and she now suffers from severe
anxiety. Robb said she had the device for two years because she has
congestive heart failure.

But Robb can't take legal action against the maker of the faulty
wire.

That is because the United States Supreme Court recently ruled that
once the Food and Drug Administration approves a medical device, a
consumer can't sue the manufacturer, even if they are injured by it.

"I think it was a good law that worked very, very well and suddenly
the Supreme Court interprets it, I believe, the wrong way," said Sen.
Patrick Leahy, D-Vermont.

"Either way, it's a duty now of the Congress to try to fix it," said
Leahy, chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

"She does not have a right, under the law, to sue because the company
did not disobey the FDA," said attorney Robert Weiner.

"Here's a woman who is basically being electrocuted, by a device that
had been recalled by a company that didn't even tell her," said
Leahy.

Medtronics, the company that makes the device used by Robb, told ABC
News they sent certified letters to all the patients and their
doctors.

But Robb said she did not know her defibrillator had been recalled
until she arrived at the hospital's emergency room.

"I had no idea," Robb said, "I was shocked."

"Consumers can't get any compensation for their injuries, even for
their deaths, at the hands of fault or defective medical devices,"
said Brian Wolfman, director of Public Citizens Litigation Group.

Lawmakers will hear from Robb, who will speak of her excruciating pain
and her frustration at the legal system. Along with another victim,
she will ask Congress to change the ruling prohibiting legal action.

Congress could change the medical device amendment and override the
Supreme Court's decision, allowing victims to receive compensation,
according to Wolfman.

The hearing will be about consumers and their legal rights, according
to Robb, but she is hoping her horrific case will help spur change.

"I don't think that there are words to sum up what I went through,"
said Robb. "I want to make sure that this does not happen to anybody
else."

Tom Shine contributed to this report.

http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/OnCall/story?id=5044693&page=1
Kelley Eidem - 11 Jun 2008 19:37 GMT
> Bridget Robb Can't Take Legal Action Because Device Was FDA-Approved
> By YUNJI DeNIES, SHEILA EVANS and STEPHANIE DAHLE
[quoted text clipped - 86 lines]
>
> http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/OnCall/story?id=5044693&page=1

Maybe it would be a good idea in cases of congestive heart failure to
try CoQ10 first to see if the problem could be healed. It's unlikely
that the doctor offered that as a first choice. Of course you can't
charge $20,000 for prescribing CoQ10, so maybe that explains it.
Jan Drew - 12 Jun 2008 03:19 GMT
> Bridget Robb Can't Take Legal Action Because Device Was FDA-Approved
> By YUNJI DeNIES, SHEILA EVANS and STEPHANIE DAHLE
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
> once the Food and Drug Administration approves a medical device, a
> consumer can't sue the manufacturer, even if they are injured by it.

Welcome to dirty organized medicine.

> "I think it was a good law that worked very, very well and suddenly
> the Supreme Court interprets it, I believe, the wrong way," said Sen.
> Patrick Leahy, D-Vermont.

Leahy has a control problem.

Leahy have introduced punitive legislation chillingly proportionate to a
special interest's campaign donations.

> "Either way, it's a duty now of the Congress to try to fix it," said
> Leahy, chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee.
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
>
> http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/OnCall/story?id=5044693&page=1

Thus, proving the FDA is dirty and NOT interested in the rights of people.
Hawki63@sbcglobal.net - 13 Jun 2008 18:22 GMT
>> Bridget Robb Can't Take Legal Action Because Device Was FDA-Approved
>> By YUNJI DeNIES, SHEILA EVANS and STEPHANIE DAHLE
[quoted text clipped - 95 lines]
>>
> Thus, proving the FDA is dirty and NOT interested in the rights of people.

good guess...but wrong as usual

you passed over the part where the manufacturer sent out certified letters
to both the patient and her doctor

learn to read ALL of an article...
Jan Drew - 15 Jun 2008 02:08 GMT
>>> Bridget Robb Can't Take Legal Action Because Device Was FDA-Approved
>>> By YUNJI DeNIES, SHEILA EVANS and STEPHANIE DAHLE
[quoted text clipped - 98 lines]
>
> good guess...but wrong as usual

Not a guess and not wrong.

> you passed over the part where the manufacturer sent out certified letters
> to both the patient and her doctor

No, I did not

> learn to read ALL of an article...

I did.

*That is because the United States Supreme Court recently ruled that once
the Food and Drug Administration approves a medical device, a consumer can't
sue the manufacturer, even if they are injured by it.*

Thus, proving the FDA is dirty and NOT interested in the rights of people.
Bedbackwards - 13 Jun 2008 00:08 GMT
> Bridget Robb Can't Take Legal Action Because Device Was FDA-Approved
> By YUNJI DeNIES, SHEILA EVANS and STEPHANIE DAHLE
> June 11, 2008

Thanks for the article, Myrl--pretty sad.
Hawki63@sbcglobal.net - 13 Jun 2008 18:20 GMT
> Bridget Robb Can't Take Legal Action Because Device Was FDA-Approved
> By YUNJI DeNIES, SHEILA EVANS and STEPHANIE DAHLE
[quoted text clipped - 58 lines]
> News they sent certified letters to all the patients and their
> doctors.

as sad as this story is...

where did her certified letters go to??

> But Robb said she did not know her defibrillator had been recalled
> until she arrived at the hospital's emergency room.
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/OnCall/story?id=5044693&page=1
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.