Connecting the Dots, Part One
Do you know that a cellular telephone can be turned into a microphone
and transmitter for the purpose of listening to conversations in the
vicinity of a phone?
Yes it can according to the U.S. Commerce Department’s Security
Office.
The FBI’s physical bugs discovered The FBI’s Joint Organized Crime
Task Force, which includes members of the NEW YORK POLICE DEPARTMENT
had little luck with conventional surveillance of the Genovese
family.
That led the FBI to resort to “roving bugs.” That lead U.S. District
Judge Barbara Jones to approve them in a series of orders in 2003 and
2004.
However, Bill Stollhans, president of the Private Investigators
Association of Virginia said such a technique would be legally
reserved for police armed with court orders and not private
investigators.
There is no law that allows private investigators to use that type of
technique. That is for exclusive use by law enforcement. It is not
allowable or legal in the private sector.
In addition, the listening parties do not even have to have the
actual phone. They can obtain software off of the internet, they just
have to know what brand of phone you have.
I have eavesdropping devices on my cell phone. I’m aware of it.
While on vacation, I had a series of strange things happen with my
cell phone, and my cell phone provider has bent over backwards trying
to determine what was causing the problem as has law enforcement.
Then I got the word, how it probably happened. There was an a.shole
private investigator and his lovely (sic) wife that moved into the
neighborhood under very suspicious conditions in May 1999, who was
monitoring my every move, and according to the neighbors had been seen
in the neighborhood sitting in a white utility van prior to that. I
purchased the cell phone and number prior to moving from California,
and kept my old number (same company) when I moved here. I’m sure the
jackass who was called in to monitor me, never thought in a million
years that his days were numbered when I got information while I was
traveling that he was connected to some of the lovely group of people
here.
Samsung, Nextel, and Motorola (especially the razr model) are very
vulnerable to this. I have a Razr.
All of this explains how Andrew Langer sent me an email after we
spoke by cell phone that whomever I told about our conversation that
it had already looped back to him. The problem was, I told NO ONE
about our conversation. It would appear that there are individuals
in this happy group here that have this need to know who I am talking
to and for what purpose.
My attorney has this information, my healthcare provider has this
information (and know when my computer was hacked into that my medical
records were subject to being viewed. My employer has this
information (not only was proprietary information discussed by cell
phone but proprietary information was emailed and was intercepted).
I have every right to be pissed off, as do my friends, family,
business associates and friends. It is no one’s business where I go,
what I do, where I live, who I email, or who I speak with. I'm not a
criminal, I'm a consumer. This is a forum for alternative health
care discussion, not a blood bath for litigation. This is the 11th
year of this stalking, computer hacking, and survelliance. There will
not be a 12th.
I’m also aware of other lawsuits that started in 1996 and 1997 that
do not have to do with alternative health that would appear to be
orchestrated by QW supporters with roots in New York, Virginia,
Florida and, North Carolina for which I was a potential witness for,
as well as my own. My telephone lines were tapped at both work, and
at home, and despite the number of times I changed telephone numbers
the numbers always were obtained, and guess who was sitting right
across the street from me, and monitoring me. I am well aware of a
party whose sister passed from AIDS, that used some form of
alternative medicine before death that was/is associated with QW and
placed his house up for collateral for one of those lawsuits. That’s
not my problem nor my fault. I didn’t even know that the party that
sued Paul Revere in 1996 (in Federal Court in California, which was
thrown out), and in again in 1997 in Superior Court of California
(which finished in about 2001 or so) was even filing a suit until I
was informed by an alleged author from NY, and another party in VA.
As with my lawsuit, the attorneys (Allen Hyman and Christine
Coverdale) falsely accused us that an act of RICO took place between
the two parties (myself, and another fan); everything I wrote could
have been proven or was freedom of speech, the other party wrote what
she wrote all on her own. It was proven that no act of RICO had taken
place.
The settlement in that lawsuit would appear to be a real interest of
someone that alleges they are a licensed acupuncturist. NO ONE owns
the rights to the settlement of my lawsuit, and monitoring me is not
an option that works for me. In fact, I recently sent the former
plaintiffs connected with my lawsuit a copy of an advertisement I
found in a travel magazine that was false and misleading that the
venue in Branson where Paul Revere and the Raiders are employed was
dispatching that was misleading. I’ve gone on with my life, and
since I have never repeated anything that I never said in the first
place, there is no need to monitor me.
There is no doubt in my mind that the plaintiffs in that old lawsuit
which was settled in 2000, have nothing to do with this stalking, but
it would appear there are some connected that believe that they are
owed something for their services whatever that is.
By the way, if you do not like the post, take it up with Comcast,
the party with the open wireless in the neighborhood is responsible
for this post, not me.
I'm just getting started by the way.
Twittering One - 11 Jun 2008 16:46 GMT
Sounds ugly. And complicated.
Bedbackwards - 12 Jun 2008 00:44 GMT
> Sounds ugly. And complicated.
Not only is it UGLY, but it is OLD.
Washington State allows alternative healthcare and has providers. It
isn't against the law for its citizens to go to one here, or
elsewhere.
You would think with the way that Quackwatch operates that want it to
be against the law!
Bedbackwards - 12 Jun 2008 00:46 GMT
> Sounds ugly. And complicated.
And since there are TWO connections to Rudy G in this happy little
group --- it is no wonder that the Loop Group overlapped!!!
But you don't go stalking people that post in newsgroups---but it
would appear that some of those connected to QW feels that they have
the right.