Message from Ilena Rosenthal, Health Lover:
www.BreastImplantawareness.org/
http://ilena-rosenthal.blogspot.com

Daubert is a very serious legal issue ... and one which has harmed
hundreds of thousands of women already injured by their failed breast
implants.

Here are some papers on it:
Litigation-Generated Science: Why Should we Care?
http://www.ehponline.org/docs/2007/9987/abstract.html

http://www.ehponline.org/docs/2007/9976/abstract.html
I am grateful to the organizers of the Project on Scientific Knowledge
and Public Policy's Coronado III conference and to the participants
for the opportunity to develop and present these ideas.

It has been used against doctors who treat people harmed by  Multiple
Chemical Sensitivity.

Steve Barrett & Steve Milloy and their corporate junk science
supporters have supported and waged and won long battles labeling fine
scientists "quacks" and "junk scientists" and defaming them on every
level while waging legal actions against them. Their Snake-oil
Vigilante Team aids their smear attacks throughout the internet
against those who work they want to shred in favor of industry bought
science.
www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/Snake-oil.htm

Their  highly funded "junk science" campaigns include defending
Daubert for their clients.

SKAPP ... www.defendingscience.org is on the other side of the issue.

There is ongoing litigation and research on this.

Myrl Jeffcoat has jumped into the middle of this debate this last
couple of weeks after Milloy wrote an attack piece against SKAPP ...
and is now giving legal opinions regarding Daubert! Who is backing all
this hard work Myrl is doing on this?

And who are the ever anonymous "us" Myrl is blathering about
here???????

"Over turning Daubert NOW, will not aid us.  Baby bottles is another
issue.  Mercury Amalgam dentistry is another issue.  Anti-vaccination
is another issue.  None of this has anything to do with breast implant
women, NOR should it be funded by them!  At least not without
disclosure.  BUT once again, we fully understand why you would wish it
so!"    Myrl Carlene JEffcoat, May 19, 2008, 1:43 PM

She is right. Overturning Daubert will not aid Barrett & Milloy's
corporate funders for sure. It will not aid Patrick O'leary's
Eurosilicone ...nor Inamed nor Dow Corning nor Dow Chemical.

For years Myrl Jeffcoat has posted thousands and thousands of posts
attacking me and promoting Quackwatch.

Who is the "us" she is claiming to speak for?

We already have a history of Myrl making up fake names sock puppets
for her Hate Campaign against me. I also have letters from women
telling me thata  Myrl Jeffcoat in no way speaks for them!!!!!

So Myrl ... who is the "us"  and the "we" you are representing????

www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/myrl.html

Who is "we" and what do you imagine you "fully understand"  is  no
financial benefit for me to have SKAPP do the fine work they are doing
working to overturn Daubert and raise awareness to the cover up around
chemials. So what are you claiming you are "fully understanding" in
that twisted mind of yours????

Here are your words ... who are you speaking for???????????????????

"Over turning Daubert NOW, will not aid us.  Baby bottles is another
issue.  Mercury Amalgam dentistry is another issue.  Anti-vaccination
is another issue.  None of this has anything to do with breast implant
women, NOR should it be funded by them!  At least not without
disclosure.  BUT once again, we fully understand why you would wish it
so!"    Myrl Carlene JEffcoat, May 19, 2008, 1:43 PM