The continuing saga of He said they said, we said she said
continues.

1.  Where people "get the information" to post hopefully only comes
from their own research, their own experiences, and no one else or no
other entity.
2.  We all have the ability to come to our own conclusions, about
sequences of events, sometimes we share those conclusions and beliefs,
other times we do not.
3.  When someone asks us to post information that is something they
want posted --- but do not want their own name associated with the
post, we run the risk of not knowing if that information is true in
nature, or just information that they want put out here that may or
may not be true.  When someone asks us to post something that may or
may not be true we run the risk of being the ones subject to being
questioned about where the information came from.  The question then
asked at that time is "Where did you get the information?"  Is it
information that is generally known or did it come from a source that
is propaganda based?
4.  Posting information about someone who has posted information that
probably did not come from the person posting the information is
probably not the best course of action.
5.  When people jump on the bandwagon and want others on their side,
and ask people to post information that may or may not be true, is
when the flames in the newsgroups appear to be the strongest.

It is always best not to "take sides," and come to your own
conclusions on your own from your own experiences.  That's why I won't
take sides with any of this --- and prefer to sit on the fence.  I'm
sure both sides of this equation have their own versions of "truth,"
and their own spin on what transpired, and their own set of friends
that post here.

Would it be possible to get through the he said, they said, we said,
she said mentality that is transpiring here and just go forward?
Being a Christian comes with responsibilities; one of them is
forgiveness.

Thank you.