Medical Forum / General / Alternative / May 2008
Please contact Sen. Schumer and the Judge!
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Ilena Rose - 30 May 2008 20:48 GMT Note from Ilena Rosenthal, Health Lover. http://ilenarose.blogspot.com www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/QuackWatchWatch.htm Barrett's Internet Junk Science PR Team
Steve Milloy ... like Stephen Barrett, are chemical industry mouths. Einormous mouths being used to protect the chemical industry while pretending to be 'unbiased.' Far from it. They are slick writers for hire who have worked for years falsely claiming industry science is 'sound.' Baloney.
They have formulas where they expound the notion that chemicals (in any and all combinations) are 'safe.' So are breast implants according to them ... and vaccinations and pharmaceuticals all get the green light from these corporate defenders.
As a corporate lawyer .... Milloy wars against plaintiffs lawyers working to bring compensation for those whose health has been destroyed by chemicals, breast implants, etc. His junk journalism uses the same formulas over and over again to claim that the industries who pay him well ... are innocent and the victims of greedy plaintiffs lawyers and their clients.
To quote from this heart wrenching appeal from Junk Lawyer, Milloy, "Though I dont know what the fate of Schumers bill will be would a Democratic-controlled Congress really undermine the credibility of the FDA? it looks like the class-action lawsuit filed in federal court may be on a collision course with the Daubert decision."
Looks like he has new job security to continue to defend Daubert ... a coup for industry. "Credibility of the FDA ??? " Who are you kidding?
Milloy should be sued for journalistic malpractice.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
CLEAR PROFILE: STEVEN MILLOY AND JUNKSCIENCE.COM 1155 Connecticut Ave Nw, Suite 300, Washington DC 20036 Phone: 202-467-8586 Fax: 202-467-0768 http://web.archive.org/web/20030223171025/http://www.clearproject.org/reports_mi lloy.html
Current Affiliations: Front man, Junkscience.com web site Adjunct Scholar, Cato Institute Commentator, Fox News.com
Compiled December 2001
Role in backlash movement: Industry flack.
Overview :"Junkman" Steven Milloy has made a career of lobbying for polluting industries, heading corporate front groups to deny environmental concerns, and ridiculing individual environmentalists on behalf of corporate interests. In the world according to Milloy, any scientific study that does not support the world view where all chemicals are safe is "junk science", all environmentalists are alarmist, and pollution and second hand smoke are harmless. The labels fly fast and furious, regardless of where the scientific mainstream falls on an issue and regardless of what point we are at in the scientific discovery process.
Interestingly, Milloy denies he was ever a lobbyist. In 1998, while executive director of the Advancement of Sound Science Coalition, he replied to an inquiry into whether he was a lobbyist: "I do not lobby for ANYONE. Before I became executive director of TASSC, I did some technical consulting for a D.C. firm which had the policy of registering all its employees and consultants as lobbyists (whether or not they lobbied) pursuant to a new law passed in 1995. I am aware of the listing and have asked it to be corrected since I no longer work for that firm. I challenge anyone to produce any evidence that I have ever lobbied any government official for anything."
However, Milloy shows up in federal lobbyist registration data for 1997 as having lobbying expenditures on his behalf, indicating his firm, the EOP Group, believed him to be an active lobbyist, "technical" or otherwise. The same federal records indicate Milloy represented the American Petroleum Institute, FMC Corp, Fort Howard, International Food Additives Council, and Monsanto. Interestingly, according to these records, Milloy lobbied for Monsanto on the subject of "food safety and labeling", which is lobbyist speak for "biotech foods". (Center for Responsive Politics, Lobbyist Database) According to the Washington Representatives, Milloy was still registered as a lobbyist with the EOP Group in 1999, with the American Petroleum Institute and FMC Corp listed as clients. (1999 Washington Representatives).
According to Milloy's official biography, Milloy holds a B.A. in Natural Sciences from The Johns Hopkins University, a Master of Health Sciences in Biostatistics from The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health, a Juris Doctorate from the University of Baltimore, and a Master of Laws from the Georgetown University Law Center.
About Junkscience.com and Citizens for the Integrity of Science (CFIS)
Since 1996, Junkscience.com has listed links to current articles on many environmental and public health issues, with running commentary courtesy of the "junkman".
Milloy defines Junk science as "bad science used by lawsuit-happy trial lawyers, the 'food police,' environmental Chicken Littles, power-drunk regulators, and unethical-to-dishonest scientists to fuel specious lawsuits, wacky social and political agendas, and the quest for personal fame and fortune." (http://www.junkscience.com/faqs.html)
Though Milloy refuses to disclose organizational details such as who pays his bills, there are a few things we know about Milloy's outfit: Though there is no contact information other than an email on the web site, Junkscience.com is registered to Milloy Inc, at the same address as the EOP Group, the lobbying firm in Washington, DC. where Milloy was registered as a lobbyist . However, the phone number for junkscience.com is registered to "Advancement of Sound Science Coalition" (a well exposed corporate front group and a former project of the EOP Group) at 1155 Connecticut Ave NW, Suite 300 in Washington, DC. This is the same phone number and address Milloy has used for the Citizens for the Integrity of Science, Junkscience.com, NoMoresScares.com, and of course, the defunct Advancement of Sound Science Coalition. The fax number used on numerous press releases over the years is "an interoffice fax" at 1155 Connecticut Ave NW,. according to a simple internet search.
Milloy's Citizens for the Integrity of Science, (CFIS) the supposed organization that sponsors Milloy's junkscience.com page, does not exist in IRS records as a non-profit (as of fall 2001), though by using a "dot.org" web address, non-profit status is suggested. Why wouldn't Milloy register his "dot.org" as a non-profit? Non-profits are subject to certain pesky rules of public disclosure- information that could be damaging to junkscience.com and the Citizens for the Integrity of Sceince's credibility. Thus, we are missing the elusive pieces of evidence we need: a solid money trail, names of board members, articles of incorporation- all things Milloy never wants us to find.
The internet site, CFIS.org (Citizens for the Integrity of Science), is registered to Steve Milloy's home address in posh Potomac, MD, with Steve Milloy listed as the administrative contact. So who is actually paying for junkscience.com? We don't know, and Milloy has repeatedly refused to disclose his patrons. Steve Milloy answers question of who pays for Junkscience.com (annoyingly in the third person), "Steve Milloy [is paying for junkscience.com]. But who pays isn't important; the substance is. Steve figures he has the junk science debate won when an opponent raises a collateral issue like funding." Collatoral issue, Steve? We see it is pretty central, especially if former (?) client Monsanto is paying for all that pro-biotech spin, for example. And can you blame us if we wonder why Milloy is pretending to run a non-profit that exists as nothing more than the same phone number set up for an known tobacco industry front group in 1993?
CFIS does appear to have some sort of board, though we know of only two members, including Milloy. In a May 11,1999 Freedom of Information Act filed by Citizens for the Integrity of Science posted on the Junkscience web page, Steve Milloy listed himself and Michael Gough of the Competitive Enterprise Institute as "Directors" of Citizens for the Integrity of Science, with TASSC's old 1155 Connecticut address and contact info, which is also Milloy's current business address.
Previous Positions/Projects
* While a registered lobbyist with the EOP Group, Milloy's clients included Monsanto, the American Petroleum Institute, Crosthwait Terney (a conservative legal firm) the FMC Corporation, and the International Food Additives Council.b(1996 Washington Representatives, Washington Representatives, 1999 and Center for Responsive Politics lobbyist database 1997 data.) Milloy claims he was "a technical consultant" for the lobbying firm.
* Milloy was a leader in the already defunct NoMoreScares.com, a web site launched in August 2000 primarily to defend biotech food and malign Fenton Communications, one of the only PR firms in Washington DC willing to work with non-profit public interest groups and their relatively small PR budgets. Other coalition members included Elizabeth Whelan of the American Council on Science and Health, Alex Avery and Michael Fumento of the Hudson Institute, National Center for Public Policy Research, Bonner Cohen of the Lexington Institute, and Michael Gough of the Cato Institute. No More Scares disappeared almost as hastily as it was brought into existence, perhaps made redundant by the Guest Choice Network, which is now called "The Center for Consumer Freedom". Who can keep track of who is doing what? (Which is exactly the goal of ever-changing corporate front groups)
* Milloy was Director of Science Policy Studies at the National Environmental Policy Institute.
* According to the P.R. Watch report "How Big Tobacco Helped Create the Junkman," Milloy got his full fledged launch as an industry apologist in the early 1990s working for the tobacco industry. In 1992 Milloy worked for James Tozzi at Multinational Business Services. Tozzi, a former career bureaucrat at the U.S. Office of Management and Budget who had spearheaded the Reagan-era OMB campaign to gut environmental regulations, is described in internal Philip Morris documents as the company's "primary contact on the EPA/ETS risk assessment during the second half of 1992." During that period, the memo noted, "Tozzi has been invaluable in executing our Washington efforts including generating technical briefing papers, numerous letters to agencies and media interviews," a service for which Philip Morris paid an estimated $300,000 in consulting fees.
Check out the full PR Watch report, complete with links to original tobacco documents.
* According to PR Watch, after leaving Tozzi's service, Milloy became president of his own organization called the "Regulatory Impact Analysis Project, Inc.," where he wrote a couple of reports arguing that "most environmental risks are so small or indistinguishable that their existence cannot be proven." Shortly thereafter, he launched the "Junk Science Home Page." Calling himself "the Junkman," he offered daily attacks on environmentalists, public health and food safety regulators, anti-nuclear and animal rights activists, and a wide range of other targets that he accused of using unsound science to advance various political agendas.
* Between March 1997 and the fall of 1998, Milloy was the well-paid head of the corporate front group,The Advancement of Sound Science Coalition (Milloy was paid $100,000 for the 1998 fiscal year according to TASSC's IRS 990 form). For a time, the Junkscience.com web site and TASSC were one and the same.
The now-defunct Advancement of Sound Science Coalition (TASSC), founded primarily by Philip Morris in 1993, was part of a corporate plan to pump millions of dollars into a campaign to cast doubt on a variety of environmental and public health issues, including global warming and second hand smoke.(The New York Times, April 25, 1998) TASSC, originally set up as a front group by APCO and Associates (PR firm related to EOP Group, Milloy's previous employer), and faded into oblivion after September 1998, possibly due to the damage caused by the negative exposure in the 1998 New York Times article. TASSC was funded by Philip Morris, Exxon, Procter and Gamble, Dow, 3M and other large corporations, primarily as a pro-tobacco and anti-tort voices. TASSC left the scene in 1998, yet Milloy has used TASSC's phone number and address for all his subsequent ventures.
Though later a project of the EOP Group, TASSC was originally based in the Washington, D.C. offices of the lobbying firm APCO Associates and claimed a membership of over 400 corporations representing chemical, agricultural, manufacturing, oil, dairy, timber, paper and mining interests, including Amoco, Chevron, and Occidental Petroleum, as well as industry trade associations. TASSC also had a science advisory panel of over 200 members, including some of the most prominent science skeptics in America. TASSC is mentioned by name in the now infamous "tobacco papers" as a group organized to help with the "scientific" message that second hand smoke is harmless. The purpose of TASSC, as described in a memo from APCO's Tom Hockaday and Neal Cohen, was to "link the tobacco issue with other more 'politically correct' products"--in other words, to make the case that efforts to regulate tobacco were based on the same "junk science".
* Environmental Policy Analysis Network- Created and run by Steven Milloy, the Environmental Policy Analysis Network is an earlier incarnation of a one-man front group. EPAN served as the pre-TASSC vehicle for Milloy's editorial campaign for "sound science" and as the home for Milloy's "Junk Science Home Page" This is particularly interesting in light of the fact that "junkscience.com" lists the EOP Group's address as the contact on its web registration.
Highlights, Achievements
* Milloy put out his latest book in September 2001 published by the Cato Institute Press, "Junk Science Judo: Self Defense Against Health Scares and Scams". Both of Milloy's previous books on similar topics were published by the Cato Institute, a Washington, D.C.-based free market think tank.
* In October 1999 Milloy rejoiced in the death of Dr. David Rall, founder of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, renowned public health leader, and by reputation a very kind person. Milloy wrote, "As far as David Rall is concerned, he was a bad guy when he was alive. ...Death did not improve track record." Milloy began his commentary on Rall's untimely death with "Scratch one junk scientist who promoted the bankrupt idea that rats with a chemical predicts cancer in humans exposed to much lower levels of the chemical -- a notion that, at the very least, has wasted billions and billions of public and private dollars." (Washington Post, October 12, 1999 and Grist Magazine, October 18, 1999)
* Milloy was equally callous following the fall 1999 death of Senator John Chafee, a Rhode Island Republican. Milloy viewed his death as a good thing for polluters because, "Unfortunately, Sen. Chafee too often acted like a Democrat on environmental and regulatory issues. The good news is his replacement as committee chairman will be Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.) who has shown courage in opposing the Kyoto protocol and the EPA air quality proposals." (As Grist Magazine's Muckracker column pointed out 11/08/99, Milloy was also wrong about Inhofe being Chafee's replacement)
Read other articles about Steve Milloy and his projects:
John Schwartz, The Washington Post, February 21, 1999. "If you Seek the Truth, Don't Trash the Science."
P.R. Watch/Center for Media and Democracy "The Usual Suspects: Industry Hacks Turn Fear on its Head"
"The Trashman Speweth"
An excerpt on Milloy and other "junkscience" talking heads, from John Stauber and Sheldon Rampton's "Trust Us, We're Experts". Posted by TomPaine.com
Other interesting sites
"Internet Bunk and the Junkscience Page" We don't know who writes this page, but he is a true skeptic and provides interesting reading.
"Junk Science and the Art of Spin-Doctoring", by Australian journalist Stewart Fist
Ilena Rose - 31 May 2008 16:53 GMT From Health Lover, Ilena Rosenthal http://ilenarose.blogspot.com
Pam has started several threads on this topic ... yet refuses to answer any question regarding it's benefit.
She & Myrl Jeffcoat & Coleah Penley Ayers have made this their new cause ... and yet their public relations is very questionable.
For example ... I have been trying to get a straight answer from Pam how this enquiry that she is championing, will help women already paid through the Multi District Litigation, or those with open cases, or even Dow women.
She & Myrl Jeffcoat have both publicly claimed that 1) I don't want an audit, and 2) I do want an audit.
Both are false.
I am still trying to get straight answers to straight questions, yet all I get are insults and Myrl & Coleah embarassing themselves (and those they claim to represent) publicly. www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/coleah-penley-ayers.htm www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/myrl.html
If I can see any benefit to the women in my support group and others harmed by breast implants from this enquiry ... then I would most probably support an audit.
But instead of answers, I get more insults and evasions.
I will repeat my question ... with the direct quote from Pam Dowd:
Question for Pam Dowd #1
"With implanted women losing their homes, becoming dependent upon family members to keep a roof over their heads and some have died waiting on their paltry settlement, then yes, the source of the money IS an issue." Pam Dowd 5/28/2008 7:14 PM.
So you are now claiming that the 6% of the attorneys fees that went into this fund from paid settlements would keep the "roofs over their heads" or would have been diverted to those waiting on their paltry settlement? Ilena Rosenthal ... several times from 5/28 - 5/31
That is not my understanding of the fund. Please clarify.
Ilena Rosenthal ... several times from 5/28 - 5/31
Question for Pam Dowd #2
Who is behind your sudden rallying toward this cause? The only other person I have seen anywhere else on the internet speaking on this, is Corporate Mouth, Steve Milloy, whose alliances are with his industrial backers and have been ... for more than a decade.
No one else is discussing this online ... who put the fire under you and Coleah & Myr?
Myrl has just expressed her desire to be an official part of the Quackwatch Propaganda Team which they named themselves "The Rag-tag Posse of Snake-oil Vigilantes." Her allegiance with their industry views is now official and came just weeks after her initial enquiry about this. Others she is officially now joining are vaccination and med device and chemical industry disinformation agents.
Who is backing this cause of yours?
And again ... how will women harmed by breast implants be personally benefitted?
Thank you.
Pam - 31 May 2008 17:38 GMT Who asked me to become involved?
First. I will protect that person from your public tirades. The person has never been involved in public posting, reserving a right to privacy.
Second. You are not a participant of MDL 926, This is not about your interests.
Third. The person who constantly brings up Milloy's name is you. Methinks you bring it up because between the two of you, you create diversion on many issues and derail vulnerable individuals from seeking information and help that is rightfully theirs.
Fourth. If you support an audit, then post it on your web site, to all the groups where you post and to your massive mailing list.
Fifth. You know women have lost their homes, health and lives waiting. Whatever their pittance of the Common Benefit Trust may have been, the money is their entitlement, not meant for causes that are totally unrelated to the silicone breast implant issue.
Sixth. It is obvious by the questions that you still ask ad nauseum that you have read neither Order 13 nor the Freedom of Information Act. Please do so.
Seventh. Again, you are not a participant of MDL 926. This concern is about the rights of the women, not any connection to you. If your name does not appear in the audit, and I seriously doubt that it would, you have nothing to fear from an audit.
Support the audit.
Pam Dowd Implant Veterans of Toxic Exposure
Ilena Rose - 31 May 2008 19:06 GMT From Health Lover, Ilena Rosenthal http://ilenarose.blogspot.com
Thank you for your partial response Pam Dowd. The part you refused to answer is very telling.
This accusation you made is blatantly false.
"Third. The person who constantly brings up Milloy's name is you." Pam Dowd May 31, 2008
Nice diversion and blatant lie. When Coleah & Myrl began their dog & pony show on this thread (Coleah posting Myrl's comments by all the 'anonymous' voices in their heads) ... they posted Milloy's piece in full and repeated it several times. http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.breast-implant/browse_thread/thread/3 7518048724c6995/752fb76c5ee66bf9
Further, Myrl did one of her famous 180 degree spins and for years exposed Milloy & his corporate funders ... then nuked that information and began advertising for Quackwatch and attacking me. http://web.archive.org/web/20010211082334/http://www.webstarmagic.com/wisletter.htm
I have merely commented on this, pointing out that Milloy (and his corporate funders) and the breast implant industry are the ONLY ones who seem to have a benefit from this 'audit.' Although I have asked you several times what benefit to the women in the MDL past or present, I get alot of doubletalk.
In fact, my belief is more firmly now than ever, is that Milloy's Junk Science funders want this audit ... so that Milloy can blast all recipients, including SKAPP (the opposite & corporate side of the ongoing Daubert issue) on FoxNews and his junkscience.com pages.
For example, YOU Pam, brought up the Women's Institute for Silicone Education and Research. http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.breast-implant/browse_thread/thread/6 e102ce9804ddb88
Only you and Milloy had written about this publicly ... he blasting Sybil and Fenton and the plaintiff's attorneys. I believe he will take this information you & Coleah & Myrl want so badly to use AGAINST SKAPP and the BPA issue ... while all of you staunchly claim you receive no funds from anyone and it's all "for the women." To date, you have shown me not one shred of any evidence that this information will benefit anyone but yourselves and those who want to derail SKAPP.
"Methinks you bring it up because between the two of you, you create diversion on many issues and derail vulnerable individuals from seeking information and help that is rightfully theirs." Pam Dowd, May 31, 2008
Sure.I disagree with Milloy on most all issues, that is true. It is you and Coleah & Myrl, however, who are teamed with his right hand shill, Andrew M Langer, who you all seem to have some delusion that all the attention he gives you is because you're so darn cute. When he found you at the FDA, Pam ... he was there on salary, on business, to continue and expland his embedded welcome into the breast implant cause. He is a paid fake "expert" for Milloy's industry 'sound" science public relations bonanza for Dow and their other funders.
You and NSIF and Coleah and Myrl have welcomed him into the breast implant cause. (see below.)
Milloy has made millions to support breast implant makers.
It has cost me hundreds of thousands of my personal dollars to raise awareness to the dangers of breast implants, and to expose the junk science / quackwatch agenda that surrounds this issue.
Yes, we speak out on opposite sides of many issues ... but unlike him, I am backed by no corporations whose bottom lines are more important than women's health.
I believe that Andrew Langer is using you and Coleah (who calls him one of her favorite young men) to get information that his funders and friends can use to attack SKAPP.
Again ... I believe you intentionally are misleading the breast implant community with your quote below. It is my belief, much more now that you refuse to answer this very honest question I have of you, that you are using harmed women to get information for Milloy to use against the cause ... just like he did when he attacked Dr. Zuckerman and Sybil Goldrich and Fenton before.
Yes, I will be putting this on my website ... with new information.
Question for Pam Dowd #1
"With implanted women losing their homes, becoming dependent upon family members to keep a roof over their heads and some have died waiting on their paltry settlement, then yes, the source of the money IS an issue." Pam Dowd 5/28/2008 7:14 PM.
So you are now claiming that the 6% of the attorneys fees that went into this fund from paid settlements would keep the "roofs over their heads" or would have been diverted to those waiting on their paltry settlement? Ilena Rosenthal ... several times from 5/28 - 5/31
That is not my understanding of the fund. Please clarify.
Ilena Rosenthal ... several times from 5/28 - 5/31/2008
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.breast-implant/browse_thread/thread/9 4560db63c7545de/30f43e764a1073c3?lnk=gst&q=andrew+langer+favorite#30f43e764a1073 c3 Coleah calling Andrew Langer one of her favorite young men.
Pam - 31 May 2008 23:37 GMT Who asked me to become involved?
First. I will protect that person from your public tirades. The person has never been involved in public posting, reserving a right to privacy.
Second. You are not a participant of MDL 926, This is not about your interests.
Third. The person who constantly brings up Milloy's name is you. Methinks you bring it up because between the two of you, you create diversion on many issues and derail vulnerable individuals from seeking information and help that is rightfully theirs.
Fourth. If you support an audit, then post it on your web site, to all the groups where you post and to your massive mailing list.
Fifth. You know women have lost their homes, health and lives waiting. Whatever their pittance of the Common Benefit Trust may have been, the money is their entitlement, not meant for causes that are totally unrelated to the silicone breast implant issue.
Sixth. It is obvious by the questions that you still ask ad nauseum that you have read neither Order 13 nor the Freedom of Information Act. Please do so.
Seventh. Again, you are not a participant of MDL 926. This concern is about the rights of the women, not any connection to you. If your name does not appear in the audit, and I seriously doubt that it would, you have nothing to fear from an audit.
Support the audit.
To all current and past participants of MDL 926 and their families:
The Common Benefit Trust has operated under the veil of secrecy allowed by the "judicial exclusion" in the Freedom of Information Act. The Trust has been funded by a percentage of all settlements from the MDL, the Private Adjudication Center, and the opt-out settlements. Therefore, how much money is in the fund and how it is spent, IS very much the business of everyone who participated in MDL 926 and/or their surviving family members.
It is time to ask for that veil of secrecy to be lifted.
Whether you understand all the legal procedings that have occurred in the past 15 years or not, please request a full forensic audit of the Common Benefit Trust.
Address your concerns to:
Sen. Charles E. Schumer Washington, DC 313 Hart Senate Building Washington, DC 20510 Phone: 202-224-6542 Fax: 202-228-3027 TDD: 202-224-0420
Hon. Judge Clemon United States District Court Hugo L. Black U.S. Courthouse 1729 5th Ave. North Birmingham, AL 35203
Pam Dowd Implant Veterans of Toxic Exposure
|
|
|