Medical Forum / General / Alternative / June 2008
Myrl Jeffcoat is now giving legal advice on Daubert ... who is putting these words in her mouth???
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Ilena Rose - 29 May 2008 02:18 GMT Message from Ilena Rosenthal, Health Lover: www.BreastImplantawareness.org/ http://ilena-rosenthal.blogspot.com
Daubert is a very serious legal issue ... and one which has harmed hundreds of thousands of women already injured by their failed breast implants.
Here are some papers on it: Litigation-Generated Science: Why Should we Care? http://www.ehponline.org/docs/2007/9987/abstract.html
http://www.ehponline.org/docs/2007/9976/abstract.html I am grateful to the organizers of the Project on Scientific Knowledge and Public Policy's Coronado III conference and to the participants for the opportunity to develop and present these ideas.
It has been used against doctors who treat people harmed by Multiple Chemical Sensitivity.
Steve Barrett & Steve Milloy and their corporate junk science supporters have supported and waged and won long battles labeling fine scientists "quacks" and "junk scientists" and defaming them on every level while waging legal actions against them. Their Snake-oil Vigilante Team aids their smear attacks throughout the internet against those who work they want to shred in favor of industry bought science. www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/Snake-oil.htm
Their highly funded "junk science" campaigns include defending Daubert for their clients.
SKAPP ... www.defendingscience.org is on the other side of the issue.
There is ongoing litigation and research on this.
Myrl Jeffcoat has jumped into the middle of this debate this last couple of weeks after Milloy wrote an attack piece against SKAPP ... and is now giving legal opinions regarding Daubert! Who is backing all this hard work Myrl is doing on this?
And who are the ever anonymous "us" Myrl is blathering about here???????
"Over turning Daubert NOW, will not aid us. Baby bottles is another issue. Mercury Amalgam dentistry is another issue. Anti-vaccination is another issue. None of this has anything to do with breast implant women, NOR should it be funded by them! At least not without disclosure. BUT once again, we fully understand why you would wish it so!" Myrl Carlene JEffcoat, May 19, 2008, 1:43 PM
She is right. Overturning Daubert will not aid Barrett & Milloy's corporate funders for sure. It will not aid Patrick O'leary's Eurosilicone ...nor Inamed nor Dow Corning nor Dow Chemical.
For years Myrl Jeffcoat has posted thousands and thousands of posts attacking me and promoting Quackwatch.
Who is the "us" she is claiming to speak for?
We already have a history of Myrl making up fake names sock puppets for her Hate Campaign against me. I also have letters from women telling me thata Myrl Jeffcoat in no way speaks for them!!!!!
So Myrl ... who is the "us" and the "we" you are representing????
www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/myrl.html
Who is "we" and what do you imagine you "fully understand" is no financial benefit for me to have SKAPP do the fine work they are doing working to overturn Daubert and raise awareness to the cover up around chemials. So what are you claiming you are "fully understanding" in that twisted mind of yours????
Here are your words ... who are you speaking for???????????????????
"Over turning Daubert NOW, will not aid us. Baby bottles is another issue. Mercury Amalgam dentistry is another issue. Anti-vaccination is another issue. None of this has anything to do with breast implant women, NOR should it be funded by them! At least not without disclosure. BUT once again, we fully understand why you would wish it so!" Myrl Carlene JEffcoat, May 19, 2008, 1:43 PM
Myrl - 29 May 2008 02:56 GMT Ilena - You are a pathological liar! Provide one shred of evidence that I have ever given legal advice on Daubert or any other issue!
You are spinning yourself into a hole - that's for sure!
And thanks once again for providing my own statement here. Now Ilena - why don't you explain to us how overturning Daubert will help the breast implant victims which have tried for over a decade to come to settlement!
Here's my words - I stand by them! They certainly don't consitute legal advice:
"Over turning Daubert NOW, will not aid us. Baby bottles is another issue. Mercury Amalgam dentistry is another issue. Anti-vaccination is another issue. None of this has anything to do with breast implant women, NOR should it be funded by them! At least not without disclosure. BUT once again, we fully understand why you would wish it so!"
Ilena - We are so grateful that you are being so transparent in your stance on this! Clearly, everyone can see that you are glad to be able to use the breast implant CBT fund to help you hop-scotch to the next class action in the sky.
Will it be plastic bottles, vaccine-autism, free speech, mercury amalgam, or what? How many issues do you hope CBT diverted funds will fund and fuel your self-promoting "advocacy"???? We all wish to know!
http://www.ilena-rosenthal.com
Coleah - 29 May 2008 03:54 GMT > Ilena - You are a pathological liar! Provide one shred of evidence > that I have ever given legal advice on Daubert or any other issue! [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > disclosure. BUT once again, we fully understand why you would wish it > so!" Why does Ilena Rosenthal promote denying breast implant women further knowledge of funding facts that have everything to do with THEM? Some 'advocate'......
> Ilena - We are so grateful that you are being so transparent in your > stance on this! Clearly, everyone can see that you are glad to be [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > amalgam, or what? How many issues do you hope CBT diverted funds will > fund and fuel your self-promoting "advocacy"???? We all wish to know! Well you make a good point, Myrl. How 'diversified' can one 'terrorizing activist' be and be effective in any arena? Functioning from doing copy/paste of others words, reports, etc, which she clearly has no scientific basis or knowledge to 'debate' with. She is good at making up loosely associated 'visions' and damn good at planting a garden of innuendo's. Good thing that rational, thinking people can see the faulty webs and choking weeds in her so called 'advocate' gesturing.
> http://www.ilena-rosenthal.com Myrl - 29 May 2008 04:21 GMT > > Ilena - You are a pathological liar! Provide one shred of evidence > > that I have ever given legal advice on Daubert or any other issue! [quoted text clipped - 43 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Shall we say CROSS PURPOSES!
I can't help but feel sorry for SKAPP, they now have Ilena Rosenthal congratulating them. . .That's going to be a sure fire credibility killer for them to deal with!
Jan Drew - 29 May 2008 05:07 GMT Jan Drew - 29 May 2008 05:06 GMT Jan Drew - 29 May 2008 05:06 GMT Ilena Rose - 29 May 2008 03:16 GMT Uh Myrl ... in your rants and spins you forgot to identity who the "we" and "us" is you claim to represent.
Here is your bad advice on Daubert yet again:
"Over turning Daubert NOW, will not aid us." Myrl Carlene Jeffcoat, May 19, 2008, 1:43 PM
Who is the "us" you are claiming to speak for???
Myrl Jeffcoat - 29 May 2008 03:29 GMT > Uh Myrl ... in your rants and spins you forgot to identity who the > "we" and "us" is you claim to represent. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Who is the "us" you are claiming to speak for??? As everyone who knows me will attest to - If I have secrets, I will take them to my grave. It's why folks tell me in things in confidence. They know they can trust me!
Ilena, if you think I would be crazy enough divulge that information to you, or post it on newsgroups, you are crazy!
Dream on!
http://www.ilena-rosenthal.com
Jan Drew - 29 May 2008 05:08 GMT "Myrl Jeffcoat" cannot anwer. Nothing new there.
Ilena Rose - 29 May 2008 18:57 GMT "I can't help but feel sorry for SKAPP, they now have Ilena Rosenthal congratulating them. . .That's going to be a sure fire credibility killer for them to deal with!" Myrl Jeffcoat, May 28, 2008 9:21 PM
So now you are now only a legal advisor, Myrl Jeffcoat, as in your absurd legal comment but YOU are an authority on who has credibility and who doesn't???
Are you aware that I defended myself successfully, at the Superior Court, Appeals Court, and the Supreme Court in a very high profile, internet SLAPP suit?
www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/BarrettVsRosenthal.htm
YOU claim I have no credibillity ... Barrett claims I have no credibility, but when the courts all ruled ... they ruled that Barrett and all his whines and cries about being "defamed" were not true. In fact, despite your mutual attempt to change history, the final words of the Supreme Court Decision are:
"As the lower courts correctly concluded, however, none of the hostile comments against Dr. Barrett alleged in the complaint are defamatory."
Why do you think WebMD interviewed me and not you, Myrl?
Why do you think Wired interviewed me and not you, Myrl?
Why do you think Chemical & Engineering News interviewed me and not you, Myrl?
Why do you think twice the Washington Times printed my letters exposing junk science propagandists, Myrl?
IF I have no credibility as YOU, Myrl "Will Ketcher" Carlene Jeffcoat, claim, why did the judges all rule in my favor against your beloved Barrett & Polevoy? Why does my support group continue to thrive.
People can look at my work and decide for themselves, Myrl ...
www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/ http://ilena-rosenthal.blogspot.com www.BreastimplantAwareness.blogspot.com
You refuse to say who you are speaking for here ... who is the "us" Myrl. Who is the "we" ?????
I know millions of people, millions of "US" that would be benefitted by "overturning Daubert."
Overturning Daubert will NOT aid Barrett & Milloy's corporate funders for sure. It will not aid Patrick O'leary's Eurosilicone ...nor Inamed nor Dow Corning nor Dow Chemical.
Who is YOUR "us" Myrl????????????
"Over turning Daubert NOW, will not aid us. Baby bottles is another issue. Mercury Amalgam dentistry is another issue. Anti-vaccination is another issue. None of this has anything to do with breast implant women, NOR should it be funded by them! At least not without disclosure. BUT once again, we fully understand why you would wish it so!" Myrl Carlene JEffcoat, May 19, 2008, 1:43 PM
Myrl - 29 May 2008 21:12 GMT |________________|___________________________________| 0 20 40 60 80 100 ILENA HYENA INTERNET RODEO CLOWN TROLL-O-METER
Jan Drew - 30 May 2008 03:23 GMT Myrl - 30 May 2008 03:38 GMT > You refuse to say who you are speaking for here ... who is the "us" > Myrl. Who is the "we" ????? Ilena, as I've stated before, I would never divulge to you, or reveal on newsgroups, who I talk or communicate with.
I have however, advised all of those with concerns about this matter, to address their concerns to:
Sen. Charles E. Schumer Washington, DC 313 Hart Senate Building Washington, DC 20510 Phone: 202-224-6542 Fax: 202-228-3027 TDD: 202-224-0420
Hon. Judge Clemon United States District Court Hugo L. Black U.S. Courthouse 1729 5th Ave. North Birmingham, AL 35203
It's time for a full forensic audit of the CBT.
Ilena Rose - 30 May 2008 14:57 GMT MYRL JEFFCOAT did a 180 degree turn and basically, took over the 'work' of promoting Patrick O'leary after Schaezler lost all credibility. Jeffcoat used Schaezler as the model ... taking up sock puppets and aliases for her attacks. O'leary was searching for a replacement to Schaezler who was no longer useful to him when he contacted me several times ... I refused.
Jeffcoat used all the propaganda tricks & lies of Schaezler ... this is the BEFORE picture.
The AFTER is Myrl calling herself "Will Ketcher" and promoting the Quack, Stephen Barrett and Junk Scientist, Patrick O'leary.
Experiences with Susan Schaezler and "Mplnt" ~ by Myrl Jeffcoat
From: "Myrl Jeffcoat" <my...@jps.net> To: <Il...@san.rr.com> Subject: Experiences with Susan Schaezler and "Mplnt" Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2000 22:16:08 -0700
To Whom it May Concern:
The purpose of this letter is to document certain experiences I have had on-line with Susan Schaezler, "Mplnt" and other entities.
In late 1995 I went on-line actively seeking information about the status of breast implant litigation. In June 1995 Dow Corning had declared bankruptcy and thrown approximately 144,000 breast implant victims into litigation limbo, who were to be part of the Global Class Action settlement.
I noted from the very beginning on the AOL Breast Implant Forum that Susan Schaezler and the entity known as "Mplnt" were present, as well as others that appeared to be very disruptive and insulting to implant victims. I had complained to Susan Schaezler, I didn't understand why a breast implant victim would be siding with an obvious pro-implant person to berate other victims.
Susan Schaezler had stated it was not her, but someone else, who was hijacking her identity and creating the disruption. I accepted her at her word, and we talked for a brief time (few days) about beginning a newslist, to create privacy for genuine implant victims, to give them safe harbor from the AOL board disruption.
While we were discussing it, she went ahead on her own and set it up, and instituted strenuous rules, regulations, and absolute control over membership. I was one of the "charter" members of BIS, and was there from the very beginning. Imagine my dismay when I discovered that "Mplnt" (one of the major disrupters of the AOL board) was also there, as a Susan Schaezler invited member.
Shortly after Susan Schaezler began BIS, she solicited from the membership an invitiation for us to all openly share our real names, addresses, phone numbers, etc. The suggestion from her, was that we ought to all feel comfortable enough with each other, and could do that.
I was one of the implant victims who did share my personal information openly on that list, and "Mplnt" was on the newslist and in the e-mail address when it occurred. Susan had always boasted that she knew the true identity of "Mplnt" and he was definitely not manufacturer related. She always suggested that he was a doctor knowledgeable about silicone issues, but did not believe our illnesses were caused by silicone.
A brief amount of time went by (a few months), when an altercation arose on the BIS newslist. It involved the presenting of a theory presented by "Mplnt" that was very controversial to one of our more knowledgeable implant victim members, Sue Lyons. Ultimately Sue was kicked off of BIS, because Sue had used an expletive in her response to "Mplnt" on BIS. Susan Schaezler immediately removed her from BIS, using the expletive as the reason.
It was because of Sue Lyon's removal, that I immediately began WIS (Women's Implant Support) with a nucleous of 9 women to keep Sue Lyons company.
Although we do not correspond now, Sue Lyons was the catalyst for my forming WIS (now a membership of 400 or so individuals). I stayed on BIS after Sue Lyons was kicked off for a time, but then the control issues from Susan Schaezler again raised their ugly head with another member (Angela Hans). This time, I unsubscribed. I didn't wish to deal with the disruption any longer.
"Mplnt" has been in our midst (breast implant forums, etc.) for many years. Susan Schaezler and he have always appeared to be joined at the hip.
Imagine my distress, when some 4 years later, I learned that "Mplnt" was none other than Patrick O'Leary (President of McGhan - Scotland). Even more distressing was the fact that I am a McGhan/3M victim.
Myrl Jeffcoat Women's Implant Support xxx Rancho Cordova, California 95670
Myrl - 30 May 2008 15:06 GMT I honestly don't know why Ilena paints herself into the corner like she does.
The facts surrounding my changing course with Ilena began during the time I was a member of Ilena's small grouplet list (about 12 or so women). I had written a statement for Ilena to take into the courts to use in her trial against Patrick O'Leary. Ilena has posted that statement several times, including to my shock that she posted it here on ASBI before she ever took it into the courts!
However, I continued to believe for some time, that Ilena was doing the right thing in pursuing the case against Patrick O'Leary.
During the Grouplet days, Ilena would often pop in and highly encourage us to come to this board and help defend her in her battles against others. I had for many years been absent from this board, and actually didn't realize how badly things were out of control here with Ilena's behavior. Finally, I paid this newsgroup a visit, after one of Ilena's more compelling requests. What I witnessed, and a few others witnessed going on here, was enough for several of grouplet members, including myself, trying to persuade Ilena to not continue battling in the manner she was.
We suggested a Newsgroup Disclosure Statement be posted by her everytime someone started to battle. It was all to no-avail, and she became more virulent, than ever before!
It was then, that I began to seriously question the motivation of Ilena's actions here and elsewhere. And to question the agenda she was on, which was horribly damaging the credibility and image of those harmed by breast implants. . .Think about it folks, if an "advocate" of those made ill by breast implants, is acting the idiot, speaking without responsibility about people, and incapable of telling the truth - then how much credibility can those harmed by breast implants have.
If the self-proclaimed advocate is flirting and pimping herself to the President of McGhan or buddying up to an attorney for the breast implant manufacturer, Bristol Meyers, how much can she REALLY be on our side???
These are serious things to ponder, if you are women in our shoes??? However, if you aren't in our shoes (which Ilena isn't), then you can do most any irresponsible things you like! And if the heat gets too much for you legally, you can simply jump the border, and hide in the Costa Rican folliage where they don't have a treaty of extradition with the United States!
> MYRL JEFFCOAT did a 180 degree turn and basically, took over the > 'work' of promoting Patrick O'leary after Schaezler lost all [quoted text clipped - 93 lines] > xxx > Rancho Cordova, California 95670 Ilena Rose - 30 May 2008 15:07 GMT Myrl Jeffcoat, speaking about herself and naming my name makes this self revealing statement:
"Yep folks, it's all about Ilena Rosenthal. And her ability to turn a buck or two - Always has been, always will be!"
I am posting about something that has nothing to do with me personally. I realize that in your Patrick O'leary supporting brain ... you are used to people around you who have made millions and millions from selling faulty breast implants.
It's not me ... but your rants about me tell everything about YOU, Will Ketcher!
Unlike you ... I have advocated for women harmed by breast implants for 13 years ... and I have never aligned myself with silicone manufacturers and med device shills like you have.
www.BreastAwareness.org/myrl.html Pathological Liar ... supporter of Patrick O'leary, Eurosilicone
As far as all of the anonymous voices in your head ... you really should get Quack Barrett to prescribe some of his meds for your halluciantions!
YOU, Myrl Jeffcoat, have modeled exactly Susan Schaezler ... it's as if you took every trick she turned, including her connection with O'leary, and copied them exactly.
Because you continue with your attacks on me and want to re-write your losers history ... I will provide your own words, before you copied Schaezler's actions exactly. YOU became HER. She use to talk in plurals when it was about her and then president of Inamed, O'leary.
Experiences with Susan Schaezler and "Mplnt" ~ by Myrl Jeffcoat
From: "Myrl Jeffcoat" <my...@jps.net> To: <Il...@san.rr.com> Subject: Experiences with Susan Schaezler and "Mplnt" Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2000 22:16:08 -0700
To Whom it May Concern:
The purpose of this letter is to document certain experiences I have had on-line with Susan Schaezler, "Mplnt" and other entities.
In late 1995 I went on-line actively seeking information about the status of breast implant litigation. In June 1995 Dow Corning had declared bankruptcy and thrown approximately 144,000 breast implant victims into litigation limbo, who were to be part of the Global Class Action settlement.
I noted from the very beginning on the AOL Breast Implant Forum that Susan Schaezler and the entity known as "Mplnt" were present, as well as others that appeared to be very disruptive and insulting to implant victims. I had complained to Susan Schaezler, I didn't understand why a breast implant victim would be siding with an obvious pro-implant person to berate other victims.
Susan Schaezler had stated it was not her, but someone else, who was hijacking her identity and creating the disruption. I accepted her at her word, and we talked for a brief time (few days) about beginning a newslist, to create privacy for genuine implant victims, to give them safe harbor from the AOL board disruption.
While we were discussing it, she went ahead on her own and set it up, and instituted strenuous rules, regulations, and absolute control over membership. I was one of the "charter" members of BIS, and was there from the very beginning. Imagine my dismay when I discovered that "Mplnt" (one of the major disrupters of the AOL board) was also there, as a Susan Schaezler invited member.
Shortly after Susan Schaezler began BIS, she solicited from the membership an invitiation for us to all openly share our real names, addresses, phone numbers, etc. The suggestion from her, was that we ought to all feel comfortable enough with each other, and could do that.
I was one of the implant victims who did share my personal information openly on that list, and "Mplnt" was on the newslist and in the e-mail address when it occurred. Susan had always boasted that she knew the true identity of "Mplnt" and he was definitely not manufacturer related. She always suggested that he was a doctor knowledgeable about silicone issues, but did not believe our illnesses were caused by silicone.
A brief amount of time went by (a few months), when an altercation arose on the BIS newslist. It involved the presenting of a theory presented by "Mplnt" that was very controversial to one of our more knowledgeable implant victim members, Sue Lyons. Ultimately Sue was kicked off of BIS, because Sue had used an expletive in her response to "Mplnt" on BIS. Susan Schaezler immediately removed her from BIS, using the expletive as the reason.
It was because of Sue Lyon's removal, that I immediately began WIS (Women's Implant Support) with a nucleous of 9 women to keep Sue Lyons company.
Although we do not correspond now, Sue Lyons was the catalyst for my forming WIS (now a membership of 400 or so individuals). I stayed on BIS after Sue Lyons was kicked off for a time, but then the control issues from Susan Schaezler again raised their ugly head with another member (Angela Hans). This time, I unsubscribed. I didn't wish to deal with the disruption any longer.
"Mplnt" has been in our midst (breast implant forums, etc.) for many years. Susan Schaezler and he have always appeared to be joined at the hip.
Imagine my distress, when some 4 years later, I learned that "Mplnt" was none other than Patrick O'Leary (President of McGhan - Scotland). Even more distressing was the fact that I am a McGhan/3M victim.
Myrl Jeffcoat Women's Implant Support xxx Rancho Cordova, California 95670
Coleah - 30 May 2008 17:38 GMT in her very professional presentation manner as Director of the Human Tricks Floundation; again attacking people; not debating scientific 'issues'.
Snicker, snicker.
Ilena Rose - 03 Jun 2008 16:00 GMT "I can't help but feel sorry for SKAPP, they now have Ilena Rosenthal congratulating them. . .That's going to be a sure fire credibility killer for them to deal with!" Myrl Jeffcoat, May 28, 2008 9:21 PM
So now you are now only a legal advisor, Myrl Jeffcoat, as in your absurd legal comment but YOU are an authority on who has credibility and who doesn't???
Are you aware that I defended myself successfully, at the Superior Court, Appeals Court, and the Supreme Court in a very high profile, internet SLAPP suit?
www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/BarrettVsRosenthal.htm
YOU claim I have no credibillity ... Barrett claims I have no credibility, but when the courts all ruled ... they ruled that Barrett and all his whines and cries about being "defamed" were not true. In fact, despite your mutual attempt to change history, the final words of the Supreme Court Decision are:
"As the lower courts correctly concluded, however, none of the hostile comments against Dr. Barrett alleged in the complaint are defamatory."
Why do you think WebMD interviewed me and not you, Myrl?
Why do you think Wired interviewed me and not you, Myrl?
Why do you think Chemical & Engineering News interviewed me and not you, Myrl?
Why do you think twice the Washington Times printed my letters exposing junk science propagandists, Myrl?
IF I have no credibility as YOU, Myrl "Will Ketcher" Carlene Jeffcoat, claim, why did the judges all rule in my favor against your beloved Barrett & Polevoy? Why does my support group continue to thrive.
People can look at my work and decide for themselves, Myrl ...
www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/ http://ilena-rosenthal.blogspot.com www.BreastimplantAwareness.blogspot.com
You refuse to say who you are speaking for here ... who is the "us" Myrl. Who is the "we" ?????
I know millions of people, millions of "US" that would be benefitted by "overturning Daubert."
Overturning Daubert will NOT aid Barrett & Milloy's corporate funders for sure. It will not aid Patrick O'leary's Eurosilicone ...nor Inamed nor Dow Corning nor Dow Chemical.
Who is YOUR "us" Myrl????????????
"Over turning Daubert NOW, will not aid us. Baby bottles is another issue. Mercury Amalgam dentistry is another issue. Anti-vaccination is another issue. None of this has anything to do with breast implant women, NOR should it be funded by them! At least not without disclosure. BUT once again, we fully understand why you would wish it so!" Myrl Carlene JEffcoat, May 19, 2008, 1:43 PM
Myrl - 03 Jun 2008 18:46 GMT I will interject with my response below:
> "I can't help but feel sorry for SKAPP, they now have Ilena Rosenthal > congratulating them. . .That's going to be a sure fire credibility > killer for them to deal with!" Myrl Jeffcoat, May 28, 2008 9:21 PM Ilena - the archives of newsgroups, and your own abusive libelous webpages, are a testiment to your lack of credibility. It has been documented well over the years. It was enough to get you banned for life from Wikipaedia, have you yanked as a "resource" from the FDA handbook on breast implants, and get you tossed off Trash Talk.
> So now you are now only a legal advisor, Myrl Jeffcoat, as in your > absurd legal comment but YOU are an authority on who has credibility > and who doesn't??? There is not one shred of evidence that I have acted as a legal advisor - that's only your over-exhuberant over-embellishment - as usual.
> Are you aware that I defended myself successfully, at the Superior > Court, Appeals Court, and the Supreme Court in a very high profile, > internet SLAPP suit? Gee Ilena - I was certain that you had overly expensive legal counsel, who were looking out for the interests of internet giants, and ISPs. That they came to your aid, in order to protect their own business interests - third party vulnerability and all. How does Mark Goldowitz feel about your claiming that "you" defended yourself successfully??? Bottom line, I think you have performed enough first party libel, that had you been litigated for a bit of it, you wouldn't have stood a snow ball's chance in hell of prevailing.
I also note that you fail to mention your previous loss in your $100 Million dollar lawsuit against AOL, an implant victim, and Patrick O'Leary. You remember the case - You lost. The defendants attorney fees were awarded, but you have refused to pay.
> Why does my support group continue to thrive. Ilena - If your support group continues to thrive so well, why aren't they all contributing and supporting each other on ASBI. Do you realize that about the only breast implant women, who ever post there are Coleah, Pam, myself, sometimes Ruby? And you are at war with most of us - if not all of us!
> People can look at my work and decide for themselves, Myrl ... And they DO!
> You refuse to say who you are speaking for here ... who is the "us" > Myrl. Who is the "we" ????? I would NEVER be so stupid as to provide names of who I speak privately with. That's all we would need in the victim community, is to have one additional abusive and libelous webpage created by you, to be added to the dozens you already host on your non-profit webspace. And more newsgroups tirades with your plastering individual's names all over the internet with your libelous and venomous spew.
> I know millions of people, millions of "US" that would be benefitted > by "overturning Daubert." Millions and millions of people "may" benefit from the overturning of Daubert Ilena. Even "YOU" as you state. However, it is a travesty that you think that it is OK for the breast implant women to have the CBT fund ripped off, to foot the bill for it (unbeknownst to breast implant women). YOU are not a breast implant woman. And I'm so glad you are being very transparent in YOUR approval of this secretive diversion of funds from the CBT to SKAPP for you other pet projects, which have NOTHING to do with the victims of breast implants.
> Who is YOUR "us" Myrl???????????? Again Ilena - I will NEVER out women I communicate with privately. To the contrary, I have continually warned them, that should you contact them with your personal agendas and tirades, they should keep their communications short and sweet. I feel protective of them against your vicious and retaliatory personality. If they are asked by you how they feel about certain things. They should respond in single words, such as, "Why" - "I don't know about that" - "I don't want to be involved."
But I also tell them to take any concerns they have about the diversion of CBT funds for issues other than the breast implant issues, they should address those concerns to Judge Clemons and Sen. Chuck Schumer.
> "Over turning Daubert NOW, will not aid us. Baby bottles is another > issue. Mercury Amalgam dentistry is another issue. Anti-vaccination > is another issue. None of this has anything to do with breast implant > women, NOR should it be funded by them! At least not without > disclosure. BUT once again, we fully understand why you would wish it > so!" Myrl Carlene JEffcoat, May 19, 2008, 1:43 PM As true today, as the day I wrote it. Overturning Daubert NOW, will not help the current breast implant victims (which the CBT fund is for) - some of the women have waited more than a decade to receive their pentances in settlement. Many not ever receiving a thing. That's not legal advice - that's just a cold hard fact.
For the facts and truth surrounding Ilena Rosenthal and her foundation, please visit:
http://www.ilena-rosenthal.com
Read it and weep!
Jan Drew - 04 Jun 2008 04:41 GMT I will interject with my response below:
On Jun 3, 8:00 am, Ilena Rose <B...@mundo.com> wrote:
> "I can't help but feel sorry for SKAPP, they now have Ilena Rosenthal > congratulating them. . .That's going to be a sure fire credibility > killer for them to deal with!" Myrl Jeffcoat, May 28, 2008 9:21 PM Ilena - the archives of newsgroups, and your own abusive libelous webpages, are a testiment to your lack of credibility. It has been documented well over the years. It was enough to get you banned for life from Wikipaedia, have you yanked as a "resource" from the FDA handbook on breast implants, and get you tossed off Trash Talk.
> So now you are now only a legal advisor, Myrl Jeffcoat, as in your > absurd legal comment but YOU are an authority on who has credibility > and who doesn't??? There is not one shred of evidence that I have acted as a legal advisor - that's only your over-exhuberant over-embellishment - as usual. ---------------------------------------------
legal advisor................Where did that come from? Where is YOUR evidence that YOU acted as a *legal advisor*?
> Are you aware that I defended myself successfully, at the Superior > Court, Appeals Court, and the Supreme Court in a very high profile, > internet SLAPP suit? Gee Ilena - I was certain that you had overly expensive legal counsel, who were looking out for the interests of internet giants, and ISPs. That they came to your aid, in order to protect their own business interests - third party vulnerability and all. How does Mark Goldowitz feel about your claiming that "you" defended yourself successfully??? Bottom line, I think you have performed enough first party libel, that had you been litigated for a bit of it, you wouldn't have stood a snow ball's chance in hell of prevailing.
I also note that you fail to mention your previous loss in your $100 Million dollar lawsuit against AOL, an implant victim, and Patrick O'Leary. You remember the case - You lost. The defendants attorney fees were awarded, but you have refused to pay.
> Why does my support group continue to thrive. Ilena - If your support group continues to thrive so well, why aren't they all contributing and supporting each other on ASBI. Do you realize that about the only breast implant women, who ever post there are Coleah, Pam, myself, sometimes Ruby? And you are at war with most of us - if not all of us! ------------------------------
Oh, my. You and Coleah are not at war with IIena??
> People can look at my work and decide for themselves, Myrl ... And they DO!
YES, and IIena is spot on about the *gang*. That includes you, Coleah, Mark S Probert and others.
> You refuse to say who you are speaking for here ... who is the "us" > Myrl. Who is the "we" ????? I would NEVER be so stupid as to provide names of who I speak privately with. ------------------------------- Translation the us and we was made up.
That's all we would need in the victim community, is to have one additional abusive and libelous webpage created by you, -------------------------------------------------
They were created from the very own words, the lies, the name calling, the *gang* behavior. Neither are they abusive or libelous. What about the abusive, libelous and childish pages from you and Coleah??
to be added to the dozens you already host on your non-profit webspace. And more newsgroups tirades with your plastering individual's names all over the internet with your libelous and venomous spew. -------------------------------------
You forgot to mention how Coleah posted a reverse directory on what she thought were my neighbors. Names, addresses and phone numbers of innocent people.
Aren't her pictures of her fat body, making fun of breasts cute, etc, eh, Myrl?
> I know millions of people, millions of "US" that would be benefitted > by "overturning Daubert." Millions and millions of people "may" benefit from the overturning of Daubert Ilena. Even "YOU" as you state. However, it is a travesty that you think that it is OK for the breast implant women to have the CBT fund ripped off, to foot the bill for it (unbeknownst to breast implant women). YOU are not a breast implant woman. =========================== ZZzz. So what? All the more reason to honor all her good works. Have you opened up your home to abused women, Myrl?
And I'm so glad you are being very transparent in YOUR approval of this secretive diversion of funds from the CBT to SKAPP for you other pet projects, which have NOTHING to do with the victims of breast implants.
> Who is YOUR "us" Myrl???????????? Again Ilena - I will NEVER out women I communicate with privately. --------------------------------------------- http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.attn-deficit/msg/b47238df12888f43
Anecdotes are not facts. They are, at best interesting stories. At worst, outright lies. Mark S Probert, Merrick, NY. YOUR buddy. Says all we need to know about you, Myrl StraightJacketCoat. Opps, I meant Jeffcoat. *;*
More continual blathering snipped.
Myrl - 04 Jun 2008 05:40 GMT |_______________________________|______| 0 20 40 60 80 100 JAN DREW TROLL-O-METER
Coleah - 04 Jun 2008 15:17 GMT > You forgot to mention how Coleah posted a reverse directory on what > she thought were my neighbors. Names, addresses and phone numbers > of innocent people. "My trailer is what we take to Florida. It is a 2000, 40' with a 21' slide out and another in the bedroom and has sliding glass doors, with a truck to match. Pure luxury. Right now, I am at home. Did you think I lived in a trailer park?? Jan "
Opps.....the son lived in the trailer park. Not Jan Drew. She just lives in the white trailer and matching truck, eh?
http://maps.live.com/default.aspx?v=2&cp=39.139877~-86.581459&style=a&lvl=19&til t=-90&dir=0&alt=-1000&encType=1
Jan Drew - 06 Jun 2008 02:50 GMT On Jun 3, 10:41 pm, "Jan Drew" <jdrew1...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> You forgot to mention how Coleah posted a reverse directory on what > she thought were my neighbors. Names, addresses and phone numbers > of innocent people. "My trailer is what we take to Florida. It is a 2000, 40' with a 21' slide out and another in the bedroom and has sliding glass doors, with a truck to match. Pure luxury. Right now, I am at home. Did you think I lived in a trailer park?? Jan " =================== Correct. Did you ever answer?? Evidently, you don't know the meaning of *home* and *house*.
Opps.....the son lived in the trailer park. ------------------------- What son?
Not Jan Drew. She just lives in the white trailer and matching truck, eh? ----------------------------------- Thought you said you came by my house? Forget that?
Um. get updated, *nosey* Coleah.
http://maps.live.com/default.aspx?v=2&cp=39.139877~-86.581459&style=a&lvl=19&til t=-90&dir=0&alt=-1000&encType=1
That is supposed to be what?
Guess you missed my posts telling of our permanent place looking out out my beautiful view across the water.
We have been blessed and worked hard. We have two places. We sold our beautiful rig. All of which has nothing to do with your *nosey* reverse directory posting of innocent peoples' names, addresses and phone numbers. While accusing me of sticking my nose in your business.
Loser, despicable trash mouth, and proven liar, Coleah P Ayres.
Firefly - 06 Jun 2008 03:20 GMT > On Jun 3, 10:41 pm, "Jan Drew" <jdrew1...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > You forgot to mention how Coleah posted a reverse directory on what > > she thought were my neighbors. Names, addresses and phone numbers > > of innocent people.
> "My trailer is what we take to Florida. It is a 2000, 40' with a 21' > slide out and another in the bedroom and has sliding glass doors, with [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > > Loser, despicable trash mouth, and proven liar, Coleah P Ayres. "Sticking your nose ?".......I thought it was 'Picking' ! http://www.ilena-rosenthal.com/47.jpg
http://maps.live.com/default.aspx?v=2&cp=39.139877~-86.581459&style=a&lvl=19&til t=-90&dir=0&alt=-1000&encType=1
Now......are you going to admit you lied and made up the story about where Myrl got her information???????? You are evading being 100% responsible. x x x
Jan Drew - 06 Jun 2008 03:39 GMT Coleah (aka)"Firefly" <dobbins@grm.net>
On Jun 5, 8:50 pm, "Jan Drew" <jdrew1...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> You forgot to mention how Coleah posted a reverse directory on what >> she thought were my neighbors. Names, addresses and phone numbers [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > > Loser, despicable trash mouth, and proven liar, Coleah P Ayres. Coleah - 06 Jun 2008 03:51 GMT > Coleah (aka)"Firefly" <dobb...@grm.net> > [quoted text clipped - 48 lines] > > - Show quoted text - "Sticking your nose ?".......I thought it was "Picking" !!! http://www.ilena-rosenthal.com/47.jpg
http://maps.live.com/default.aspx?v=2&cp=39.139877~-86.581459&style=a&lvl=19&til t=-90&dir=0&alt=-1000&encType=1
Now are you going to admit that you lied and made up the story about where Myrl got he information from? False witnessing is okay for you ??? * *
Coleah - 06 Jun 2008 03:28 GMT > On Jun 3, 10:41 pm, "Jan Drew" <jdrew1...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > Guess you missed my posts telling of our permanent place looking out out my > beautiful view across the water. **
> We have been blessed and worked hard. We have two places. We sold our > beautiful rig. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Loser, despicable trash mouth, and proven liar, Coleah P Ayres. "Sticking your nose ?".......I thought it was "Picking" !!! http://www.ilena-rosenthal.com/47.jpg
http://maps.live.com/default.aspx?v=2&cp=39.139877~-86.581459&style=a&lvl=19&til t=-90&dir=0&alt=-1000&encType=1
Now are you going to admit that you lied and made up the story about where Myrl got he information from? False witnessing is okay for you ??? * *
|
|
|