Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Alternative / June 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Myrl Jeffcoat is now giving legal advice on Daubert ... who is putting these words in her mouth???

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Ilena Rose - 29 May 2008 02:18 GMT
Message from Ilena Rosenthal, Health Lover:
www.BreastImplantawareness.org/
http://ilena-rosenthal.blogspot.com

Daubert is a very serious legal issue ... and one which has harmed
hundreds of thousands of women already injured by their failed breast
implants.

Here are some papers on it:
Litigation-Generated Science: Why Should we Care?
http://www.ehponline.org/docs/2007/9987/abstract.html

http://www.ehponline.org/docs/2007/9976/abstract.html
I am grateful to the organizers of the Project on Scientific Knowledge
and Public Policy's Coronado III conference and to the participants
for the opportunity to develop and present these ideas.

It has been used against doctors who treat people harmed by  Multiple
Chemical Sensitivity.

Steve Barrett & Steve Milloy and their corporate junk science
supporters have supported and waged and won long battles labeling fine
scientists "quacks" and "junk scientists" and defaming them on every
level while waging legal actions against them. Their Snake-oil
Vigilante Team aids their smear attacks throughout the internet
against those who work they want to shred in favor of industry bought
science.
www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/Snake-oil.htm

Their  highly funded "junk science" campaigns include defending
Daubert for their clients.

SKAPP ... www.defendingscience.org is on the other side of the issue.

There is ongoing litigation and research on this.

Myrl Jeffcoat has jumped into the middle of this debate this last
couple of weeks after Milloy wrote an attack piece against SKAPP ...
and is now giving legal opinions regarding Daubert! Who is backing all
this hard work Myrl is doing on this?

And who are the ever anonymous "us" Myrl is blathering about
here???????

"Over turning Daubert NOW, will not aid us.  Baby bottles is another
issue.  Mercury Amalgam dentistry is another issue.  Anti-vaccination
is another issue.  None of this has anything to do with breast implant
women, NOR should it be funded by them!  At least not without
disclosure.  BUT once again, we fully understand why you would wish it
so!"    Myrl Carlene JEffcoat, May 19, 2008, 1:43 PM

She is right. Overturning Daubert will not aid Barrett & Milloy's
corporate funders for sure. It will not aid Patrick O'leary's
Eurosilicone ...nor Inamed nor Dow Corning nor Dow Chemical.

For years Myrl Jeffcoat has posted thousands and thousands of posts
attacking me and promoting Quackwatch.

Who is the "us" she is claiming to speak for?

We already have a history of Myrl making up fake names sock puppets
for her Hate Campaign against me. I also have letters from women
telling me thata  Myrl Jeffcoat in no way speaks for them!!!!!

So Myrl ... who is the "us"  and the "we" you are representing????

www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/myrl.html

Who is "we" and what do you imagine you "fully understand"  is  no
financial benefit for me to have SKAPP do the fine work they are doing
working to overturn Daubert and raise awareness to the cover up around
chemials. So what are you claiming you are "fully understanding" in
that twisted mind of yours????

Here are your words ... who are you speaking for???????????????????

"Over turning Daubert NOW, will not aid us.  Baby bottles is another
issue.  Mercury Amalgam dentistry is another issue.  Anti-vaccination
is another issue.  None of this has anything to do with breast implant
women, NOR should it be funded by them!  At least not without
disclosure.  BUT once again, we fully understand why you would wish it
so!"    Myrl Carlene JEffcoat, May 19, 2008, 1:43 PM
Myrl - 29 May 2008 02:56 GMT
Ilena - You are a pathological liar!  Provide one shred of evidence
that I have ever given legal advice on Daubert or any other issue!

You are spinning yourself into a hole - that's for sure!

And thanks once again for providing my own statement here.  Now Ilena
- why don't you explain to us how overturning Daubert will help the
breast implant victims which have tried for over a decade to come to
settlement!

Here's my words - I stand by them!  They certainly don't consitute
legal advice:

"Over turning Daubert NOW, will not aid us.  Baby bottles is another
issue.  Mercury Amalgam dentistry is another issue.  Anti-vaccination
is another issue.  None of this has anything to do with breast implant
women, NOR should it be funded by them!  At least not without
disclosure.  BUT once again, we fully understand why you would wish it
so!"

Ilena - We are so grateful that you are being so transparent in your
stance on this!  Clearly, everyone can see that you are glad to be
able to use the breast implant CBT fund to help you hop-scotch to the
next class action in the sky.

Will it be plastic bottles, vaccine-autism, free speech, mercury
amalgam, or what?  How many issues do you hope CBT diverted funds will
fund and fuel your self-promoting "advocacy"????  We all wish to know!

http://www.ilena-rosenthal.com
Coleah - 29 May 2008 03:54 GMT
> Ilena - You are a pathological liar!  Provide one shred of evidence
> that I have ever given legal advice on Daubert or any other issue!
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> disclosure.  BUT once again, we fully understand why you would wish it
> so!"

Why does Ilena Rosenthal promote denying breast implant women further
knowledge of funding facts that have everything to do with THEM?  Some
'advocate'......

> Ilena - We are so grateful that you are being so transparent in your
> stance on this!  Clearly, everyone can see that you are glad to be
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> amalgam, or what?  How many issues do you hope CBT diverted funds will
> fund and fuel your self-promoting "advocacy"????  We all wish to know!

Well you make a good point, Myrl.
How 'diversified' can one 'terrorizing activist' be and be effective
in any arena?  Functioning from doing copy/paste of others words,
reports, etc, which she clearly has no scientific basis or knowledge
to 'debate' with.   She is good at making up loosely associated
'visions' and damn good at planting a garden of innuendo's.  Good
thing that rational, thinking people can see the faulty webs and
choking weeds in her so called 'advocate' gesturing.

> http://www.ilena-rosenthal.com
Myrl - 29 May 2008 04:21 GMT
> > Ilena - You are a pathological liar!  Provide one shred of evidence
> > that I have ever given legal advice on Daubert or any other issue!
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Shall we say CROSS PURPOSES!

I can't help but feel sorry for SKAPP, they now have Ilena Rosenthal
congratulating them. . .That's going to be a sure fire credibility
killer for them to deal with!
Jan Drew - 29 May 2008 05:07 GMT
Jan Drew - 29 May 2008 05:06 GMT
Jan Drew - 29 May 2008 05:06 GMT
Ilena Rose - 29 May 2008 03:16 GMT
Uh Myrl ... in your rants and spins you forgot to identity who the
"we" and "us" is you claim to represent.

Here is your bad advice on Daubert yet again:

"Over turning Daubert NOW, will not aid us."
      Myrl Carlene Jeffcoat, May 19, 2008, 1:43 PM

Who is the "us" you are claiming to speak for???
Myrl Jeffcoat - 29 May 2008 03:29 GMT
> Uh Myrl ... in your rants and spins you forgot to identity who the
> "we" and "us" is you claim to represent.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Who is the "us" you are claiming to speak for???

As everyone who knows me will attest to - If I have secrets, I will
take them to my grave.  It's why folks tell me in things in
confidence.  They know they can trust me!

Ilena, if you think I would be crazy enough divulge that information
to you, or post it on newsgroups, you are crazy!

Dream on!

http://www.ilena-rosenthal.com
Jan Drew - 29 May 2008 05:08 GMT
"Myrl Jeffcoat" cannot anwer.
Nothing new there.
Ilena Rose - 29 May 2008 18:57 GMT
"I can't help but feel sorry for SKAPP, they now have Ilena Rosenthal
congratulating them. . .That's going to be a sure fire credibility
killer for them to deal with!"  Myrl Jeffcoat, May 28, 2008 9:21 PM

So now you are now only a legal advisor, Myrl Jeffcoat, as in  your
absurd legal comment but YOU are an authority on who has credibility
and who doesn't???

Are you aware that I defended myself successfully, at the Superior
Court, Appeals Court, and the Supreme Court in a very high profile,
internet SLAPP suit?

www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/BarrettVsRosenthal.htm

YOU claim I have no credibillity ... Barrett claims I have no
credibility, but when the courts all ruled ... they ruled that Barrett
and all his whines and cries about being "defamed" were not true. In
fact, despite your mutual attempt to change history, the final words
of the Supreme Court Decision are:

"As the lower courts correctly concluded, however, none of the hostile
comments against Dr. Barrett alleged in the complaint are defamatory."

Why do  you think  WebMD interviewed me and not you, Myrl?

Why do  you think Wired  interviewed me and not you, Myrl?

Why do  you think  Chemical & Engineering News  interviewed me and not
you, Myrl?

Why do  you think twice the Washington Times printed my letters
exposing junk science propagandists, Myrl?

IF I have no credibility as YOU, Myrl "Will Ketcher" Carlene Jeffcoat,
claim, why did the judges all rule in my favor against your beloved
Barrett & Polevoy? Why does my support group continue to thrive.

People can look at my work and decide for themselves, Myrl ...

www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/
http://ilena-rosenthal.blogspot.com
www.BreastimplantAwareness.blogspot.com

You refuse to say who you are speaking for here ... who is the "us"
Myrl. Who is the "we" ?????

I know millions of people, millions of "US" that would be benefitted
by "overturning Daubert."

Overturning Daubert will NOT aid Barrett & Milloy's
corporate funders for sure. It will not aid Patrick O'leary's
Eurosilicone ...nor Inamed nor Dow Corning nor Dow Chemical.

Who is YOUR "us" Myrl????????????

"Over turning Daubert NOW, will not aid us.  Baby bottles is another
issue.  Mercury Amalgam dentistry is another issue.  Anti-vaccination
is another issue.  None of this has anything to do with breast implant
women, NOR should it be funded by them!  At least not without
disclosure.  BUT once again, we fully understand why you would wish it
so!"    Myrl Carlene JEffcoat, May 19, 2008, 1:43 PM
Myrl - 29 May 2008 21:12 GMT
|________________|___________________________________|
0         20         40         60         80       100
 ILENA HYENA INTERNET RODEO CLOWN TROLL-O-METER
Jan Drew - 30 May 2008 03:23 GMT
Myrl - 30 May 2008 03:38 GMT
> You refuse to say who you are speaking for here ... who is the "us"
> Myrl. Who is the "we" ?????

Ilena, as I've stated before, I would never divulge to you, or reveal
on newsgroups, who I talk or communicate with.

I have however, advised all of those with concerns about this matter,
to address their concerns to:

Sen. Charles E. Schumer
Washington, DC
313 Hart Senate Building
Washington, DC 20510
Phone: 202-224-6542
Fax: 202-228-3027
TDD: 202-224-0420

Hon. Judge Clemon
United States District Court
Hugo L. Black U.S. Courthouse
1729 5th Ave. North
Birmingham, AL 35203

It's time for a full forensic audit of the CBT.
Ilena Rose - 30 May 2008 14:57 GMT
MYRL JEFFCOAT did a 180 degree turn and basically, took over the
'work' of promoting Patrick O'leary after Schaezler lost all
credibility. Jeffcoat used Schaezler as the model ... taking up sock
puppets and aliases for her attacks. O'leary was searching for a
replacement to Schaezler who was no longer useful to him when he
contacted me several times ... I refused.

Jeffcoat used all the propaganda tricks & lies of Schaezler ... this
is the BEFORE picture.

The AFTER is Myrl calling herself "Will Ketcher" and promoting the
Quack, Stephen Barrett and Junk Scientist, Patrick O'leary.

Experiences with Susan Schaezler and "Mplnt" ~ by Myrl Jeffcoat

From: "Myrl Jeffcoat" <my...@jps.net>
To: <Il...@san.rr.com>
Subject: Experiences with Susan Schaezler and "Mplnt"
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2000 22:16:08 -0700

To Whom it May Concern:

The purpose of this letter is to document certain experiences I have
had on-line with Susan Schaezler, "Mplnt" and other entities.

In late 1995 I went on-line actively seeking information about the
status of breast implant litigation.  In June 1995 Dow Corning had
declared bankruptcy and thrown approximately 144,000 breast implant
victims into litigation limbo, who were to be part of the Global Class
Action settlement.

I noted from the very beginning on the AOL Breast Implant Forum that
Susan Schaezler and the entity known as "Mplnt" were present, as well
as others that appeared to be very disruptive and insulting to implant
victims.  I had complained to Susan Schaezler, I didn't understand why
a breast implant victim would be siding with an obvious pro-implant
person to berate other victims.

Susan Schaezler had stated it was not her, but someone else, who was
hijacking her identity and creating the disruption.  I accepted her at
her word, and we talked for a brief time (few days) about beginning a
newslist, to create privacy for genuine implant victims, to give them
safe harbor from the AOL board disruption.

While we were discussing it, she went ahead on her own and set it up,
and instituted strenuous rules, regulations, and absolute control over
membership.  I was one of the "charter" members of BIS, and was there
from the very beginning. Imagine my dismay when I discovered that
"Mplnt" (one of the major disrupters of the AOL board) was also there,
as a Susan Schaezler invited member.

Shortly after Susan Schaezler began BIS, she solicited from the
membership an invitiation for us to all openly share our real names,
addresses, phone numbers, etc.  The suggestion from her, was that we
ought to all feel comfortable enough with each other, and could do
that.

I was one of the implant victims who did share my personal information
openly on that list, and "Mplnt" was on the newslist and in the e-mail
address when it occurred.  Susan had always boasted that she knew the
true identity of "Mplnt" and he was definitely not manufacturer
related.  She always suggested that he was a doctor knowledgeable
about silicone issues, but did not believe our illnesses were caused
by silicone.

A brief amount of time went by (a few months), when an altercation
arose on
the BIS newslist.  It involved the presenting of a theory presented by
"Mplnt" that was very controversial to one of our more knowledgeable
implant victim members, Sue Lyons.  Ultimately Sue was kicked off of
BIS, because Sue had used an expletive in her response to "Mplnt" on
BIS. Susan Schaezler immediately removed her from BIS, using the
expletive as the reason.

It was because of Sue Lyon's removal, that I immediately began WIS
(Women's Implant Support) with a nucleous of 9 women to keep Sue Lyons
company.

Although we do not correspond now, Sue Lyons was the catalyst for my
forming WIS (now a membership of 400 or so individuals). I stayed on
BIS after Sue Lyons was kicked off for a time, but then the control
issues from Susan Schaezler again raised their ugly head with another
member (Angela Hans). This time, I unsubscribed.  I didn't wish to
deal with the disruption any longer.

"Mplnt" has been in our midst (breast implant forums, etc.) for many
years. Susan Schaezler and he have always appeared to be joined at the
hip.

Imagine my distress, when some 4 years later, I learned that "Mplnt"
was none other than Patrick O'Leary (President of McGhan - Scotland).
Even more distressing was the fact that I am a McGhan/3M victim.

Myrl Jeffcoat
Women's Implant Support
xxx
Rancho Cordova, California 95670
Myrl - 30 May 2008 15:06 GMT
I honestly don't know why Ilena paints herself into the corner like
she does.

The facts surrounding my changing course with Ilena began during the
time I was a member of Ilena's small grouplet list (about 12 or so
women).  I had written a statement for Ilena to take into the courts
to use in her trial against Patrick O'Leary.  Ilena has posted that
statement several times, including to my shock that she posted it here
on ASBI before she ever took it into the courts!

However, I continued to believe for some time, that Ilena was doing
the right thing in pursuing the case against Patrick O'Leary.

During the Grouplet days, Ilena would often pop in and highly
encourage us to come to this board and help defend her in her battles
against others.  I had for many years been absent from this board, and
actually didn't realize how badly things were out of control here with
Ilena's behavior.  Finally, I paid this newsgroup a visit, after one
of Ilena's
more compelling requests.  What I witnessed, and a few others
witnessed going on here, was enough for several of grouplet members,
including myself, trying to persuade Ilena to not continue battling in
the manner she was.

We suggested a Newsgroup Disclosure Statement be posted by her
everytime someone started to battle.  It was all to no-avail, and she
became more virulent, than ever before!

It was then, that I began to seriously question the motivation of
Ilena's actions here and elsewhere.  And to question the agenda she
was on, which was horribly damaging the credibility and image of those
harmed by breast implants. . .Think about it folks, if an "advocate"
of those made ill by breast implants, is acting the idiot, speaking
without responsibility about people, and incapable of telling the
truth - then how much credibility can those harmed by breast implants
have.

If the self-proclaimed advocate is flirting and pimping herself to the
President of McGhan or buddying up to an attorney for the breast
implant manufacturer, Bristol Meyers, how much can she REALLY be on
our side???

These are serious things to ponder, if you are women in our shoes???
However, if you aren't in our shoes (which Ilena isn't), then you can
do most any irresponsible things you like!  And if the heat gets too
much for you legally, you can simply jump the border, and hide in the
Costa Rican folliage where they don't have a treaty of extradition
with
the United States!

> MYRL JEFFCOAT did a 180 degree turn and basically, took over the
> 'work' of promoting Patrick O'leary after Schaezler lost all
[quoted text clipped - 93 lines]
> xxx
> Rancho Cordova, California 95670
Ilena Rose - 30 May 2008 15:07 GMT
Myrl Jeffcoat, speaking about herself and naming my name makes this
self revealing statement:

"Yep folks, it's all about Ilena Rosenthal.  And her ability to turn a
buck or two - Always has been, always will be!"

I am posting about something that has nothing to do with me
personally. I realize that in your Patrick O'leary supporting brain
... you are used to people around you who have made millions and
millions from selling faulty breast implants.

It's not me ... but your rants about me tell everything about YOU,
Will Ketcher!

Unlike you ... I have advocated for women harmed by breast implants
for 13 years ... and I have never aligned myself with silicone
manufacturers and med device shills like you have.

www.BreastAwareness.org/myrl.html
Pathological Liar ... supporter of Patrick O'leary, Eurosilicone

As far as all of the anonymous voices in your head ... you really
should get Quack Barrett to prescribe some of his meds for your
halluciantions!

YOU, Myrl Jeffcoat, have modeled exactly Susan Schaezler ... it's as
if you took every trick she turned, including her connection with
O'leary, and copied them exactly.

Because you continue with your attacks on me and want to re-write your
losers history ... I will provide your own words, before you copied
Schaezler's actions exactly. YOU became HER. She use to talk in
plurals when it was about her and then president of Inamed, O'leary.

Experiences with Susan Schaezler and "Mplnt" ~ by Myrl Jeffcoat

From: "Myrl Jeffcoat" <my...@jps.net>
To: <Il...@san.rr.com>
Subject: Experiences with Susan Schaezler and "Mplnt"
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2000 22:16:08 -0700

To Whom it May Concern:

The purpose of this letter is to document certain experiences I have
had on-line with Susan Schaezler, "Mplnt" and other entities.

In late 1995 I went on-line actively seeking information about the
status of breast implant litigation.  In June 1995 Dow Corning had
declared bankruptcy and thrown approximately 144,000 breast implant
victims into litigation limbo, who were to be part of the Global Class
Action settlement.

I noted from the very beginning on the AOL Breast Implant Forum that
Susan Schaezler and the entity known as "Mplnt" were present, as well
as others that appeared to be very disruptive and insulting to implant
victims.  I had complained to Susan Schaezler, I didn't understand why
a breast implant victim would be siding with an obvious pro-implant
person to berate other victims.

Susan Schaezler had stated it was not her, but someone else, who was
hijacking her identity and creating the disruption.  I accepted her at
her word, and we talked for a brief time (few days) about beginning a
newslist, to create privacy for genuine implant victims, to give them
safe harbor from the AOL board disruption.

While we were discussing it, she went ahead on her own and set it up,
and instituted strenuous rules, regulations, and absolute control over
membership.  I was one of the "charter" members of BIS, and was there
from the very beginning. Imagine my dismay when I discovered that
"Mplnt" (one of the major disrupters of the AOL board) was also there,
as a Susan Schaezler invited member.

Shortly after Susan Schaezler began BIS, she solicited from the
membership an invitiation for us to all openly share our real names,
addresses, phone numbers, etc.  The suggestion from her, was that we
ought to all feel comfortable enough with each other, and could do
that.

I was one of the implant victims who did share my personal information
openly on that list, and "Mplnt" was on the newslist and in the e-mail
address when it occurred.  Susan had always boasted that she knew the
true identity of "Mplnt" and he was definitely not manufacturer
related.  She always suggested that he was a doctor knowledgeable
about silicone issues, but did not believe our illnesses were caused
by silicone.

A brief amount of time went by (a few months), when an altercation
arose on
the BIS newslist.  It involved the presenting of a theory presented by
"Mplnt" that was very controversial to one of our more knowledgeable
implant victim members, Sue Lyons.  Ultimately Sue was kicked off of
BIS, because Sue had used an expletive in her response to "Mplnt" on
BIS. Susan Schaezler immediately removed her from BIS, using the
expletive as the reason.

It was because of Sue Lyon's removal, that I immediately began WIS
(Women's Implant Support) with a nucleous of 9 women to keep Sue Lyons
company.

Although we do not correspond now, Sue Lyons was the catalyst for my
forming WIS (now a membership of 400 or so individuals). I stayed on
BIS after Sue Lyons was kicked off for a time, but then the control
issues from Susan Schaezler again raised their ugly head with another
member (Angela Hans). This time, I unsubscribed.  I didn't wish to
deal with the disruption any longer.

"Mplnt" has been in our midst (breast implant forums, etc.) for many
years. Susan Schaezler and he have always appeared to be joined at the
hip.

Imagine my distress, when some 4 years later, I learned that "Mplnt"
was none other than Patrick O'Leary (President of McGhan - Scotland).
Even more distressing was the fact that I am a McGhan/3M victim.

Myrl Jeffcoat
Women's Implant Support
xxx
Rancho Cordova, California 95670
Coleah - 30 May 2008 17:38 GMT
in her very professional presentation manner as
Director of the Human Tricks Floundation; again
attacking people; not debating scientific 'issues'.

Snicker, snicker.
Ilena Rose - 03 Jun 2008 16:00 GMT
"I can't help but feel sorry for SKAPP, they now have Ilena Rosenthal
congratulating them. . .That's going to be a sure fire credibility
killer for them to deal with!"  Myrl Jeffcoat, May 28, 2008 9:21 PM

So now you are now only a legal advisor, Myrl Jeffcoat, as in  your
absurd legal comment but YOU are an authority on who has credibility
and who doesn't???

Are you aware that I defended myself successfully, at the Superior
Court, Appeals Court, and the Supreme Court in a very high profile,
internet SLAPP suit?

www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/BarrettVsRosenthal.htm

YOU claim I have no credibillity ... Barrett claims I have no
credibility, but when the courts all ruled ... they ruled that Barrett
and all his whines and cries about being "defamed" were not true. In
fact, despite your mutual attempt to change history, the final words
of the Supreme Court Decision are:

"As the lower courts correctly concluded, however, none of the hostile
comments against Dr. Barrett alleged in the complaint are defamatory."

Why do  you think  WebMD interviewed me and not you, Myrl?

Why do  you think Wired  interviewed me and not you, Myrl?

Why do  you think  Chemical & Engineering News  interviewed me and not
you, Myrl?

Why do  you think twice the Washington Times printed my letters
exposing junk science propagandists, Myrl?

IF I have no credibility as YOU, Myrl "Will Ketcher" Carlene Jeffcoat,
claim, why did the judges all rule in my favor against your beloved
Barrett & Polevoy? Why does my support group continue to thrive.

People can look at my work and decide for themselves, Myrl ...

www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/
http://ilena-rosenthal.blogspot.com
www.BreastimplantAwareness.blogspot.com

You refuse to say who you are speaking for here ... who is the "us"
Myrl. Who is the "we" ?????

I know millions of people, millions of "US" that would be benefitted
by "overturning Daubert."

Overturning Daubert will NOT aid Barrett & Milloy's
corporate funders for sure. It will not aid Patrick O'leary's
Eurosilicone ...nor Inamed nor Dow Corning nor Dow Chemical.

Who is YOUR "us" Myrl????????????

"Over turning Daubert NOW, will not aid us.  Baby bottles is another
issue.  Mercury Amalgam dentistry is another issue.  Anti-vaccination
is another issue.  None of this has anything to do with breast implant
women, NOR should it be funded by them!  At least not without
disclosure.  BUT once again, we fully understand why you would wish it
so!"    Myrl Carlene JEffcoat, May 19, 2008, 1:43 PM
Myrl - 03 Jun 2008 18:46 GMT
I will interject with my response below:

> "I can't help but feel sorry for SKAPP, they now have Ilena Rosenthal
> congratulating them. . .That's going to be a sure fire credibility
> killer for them to deal with!"  Myrl Jeffcoat, May 28, 2008 9:21 PM

Ilena - the archives of newsgroups, and your own abusive libelous
webpages, are a testiment to your lack of credibility.  It has been
documented well over the years.  It was enough to get you banned for
life from Wikipaedia, have you yanked as a "resource" from the FDA
handbook on breast implants, and get you tossed off Trash Talk.

> So now you are now only a legal advisor, Myrl Jeffcoat, as in  your
> absurd legal comment but YOU are an authority on who has credibility
> and who doesn't???

There is not one shred of evidence that I have acted as a legal
advisor - that's only your over-exhuberant over-embellishment - as
usual.

> Are you aware that I defended myself successfully, at the Superior
> Court, Appeals Court, and the Supreme Court in a very high profile,
> internet SLAPP suit?

Gee Ilena - I was certain that you had overly expensive legal counsel,
who were looking out for the interests of internet giants, and ISPs.
That they came to your aid, in order to protect their own business
interests - third party vulnerability and all.  How does Mark
Goldowitz feel about your claiming that "you" defended yourself
successfully???  Bottom line, I think you have performed enough first
party libel, that had you been litigated for a bit of it, you wouldn't
have stood a snow ball's chance in hell of prevailing.

I also note that you fail to mention your previous loss in your $100
Million dollar lawsuit against AOL, an implant victim, and Patrick
O'Leary.  You remember the case - You lost.  The defendants attorney
fees were awarded, but you have refused to pay.

> Why does my support group continue to thrive.

Ilena - If your support group continues to thrive so well, why aren't
they all contributing and supporting each other on ASBI.  Do you
realize that about the only breast implant women, who ever post there
are Coleah, Pam, myself, sometimes Ruby?  And you are at war with most
of us - if not all of us!

> People can look at my work and decide for themselves, Myrl ...

And they DO!

> You refuse to say who you are speaking for here ... who is the "us"
> Myrl. Who is the "we" ?????

I would NEVER be so stupid as to provide names of who I speak
privately with.  That's all we would need in the victim community, is
to have one additional abusive and libelous webpage created by you, to
be added to the dozens you already host on your non-profit webspace.
And more newsgroups tirades with your plastering individual's names
all over the internet with your libelous and venomous spew.

> I know millions of people, millions of "US" that would be benefitted
> by "overturning Daubert."

Millions and millions of people "may" benefit from the overturning of
Daubert Ilena.  Even "YOU" as you state.  However, it is a travesty
that you think that it is OK for the breast implant women to have the
CBT fund ripped off, to foot the bill for it (unbeknownst to breast
implant women).  YOU are not a breast implant woman.  And I'm so glad
you are being very transparent in YOUR approval of this secretive
diversion of funds from the CBT to SKAPP for you other pet projects,
which have NOTHING to do with the victims of breast implants.

> Who is YOUR "us" Myrl????????????

Again Ilena - I will NEVER out women I communicate with privately.  To
the contrary, I have continually warned them, that should you contact
them with your personal agendas and tirades, they should keep their
communications short and sweet.  I feel protective of them against
your vicious and retaliatory personality.  If they are asked by you
how they feel about certain things.  They should respond in single
words, such as, "Why" - "I don't know about that" - "I don't want to
be involved."

But I also tell them to take any concerns they have about the
diversion of CBT funds for issues other than the breast implant
issues, they should address those concerns to Judge Clemons and Sen.
Chuck Schumer.

> "Over turning Daubert NOW, will not aid us.  Baby bottles is another
> issue.  Mercury Amalgam dentistry is another issue.  Anti-vaccination
> is another issue.  None of this has anything to do with breast implant
> women, NOR should it be funded by them!  At least not without
> disclosure.  BUT once again, we fully understand why you would wish it
> so!"    Myrl Carlene JEffcoat, May 19, 2008, 1:43 PM

As true today, as the day I wrote it.  Overturning Daubert NOW, will
not help the current breast implant victims (which the CBT fund is
for) - some of the women have waited more than a decade to receive
their pentances in settlement.  Many not ever receiving a thing.
That's not legal advice - that's just a cold hard fact.

For the facts and truth surrounding Ilena Rosenthal and her
foundation, please visit:

http://www.ilena-rosenthal.com

Read it and weep!
Jan Drew - 04 Jun 2008 04:41 GMT
I will interject with my response below:

On Jun 3, 8:00 am, Ilena Rose <B...@mundo.com> wrote:
> "I can't help but feel sorry for SKAPP, they now have Ilena Rosenthal
> congratulating them. . .That's going to be a sure fire credibility
> killer for them to deal with!" Myrl Jeffcoat, May 28, 2008 9:21 PM

Ilena - the archives of newsgroups, and your own abusive libelous
webpages, are a testiment to your lack of credibility.  It has been
documented well over the years.  It was enough to get you banned for
life from Wikipaedia, have you yanked as a "resource" from the FDA
handbook on breast implants, and get you tossed off Trash Talk.

> So now you are now only a legal advisor, Myrl Jeffcoat, as in your
> absurd legal comment but YOU are an authority on who has credibility
> and who doesn't???

There is not one shred of evidence that I have acted as a legal
advisor - that's only your over-exhuberant over-embellishment - as
usual.
---------------------------------------------

legal advisor................Where did that come from?
Where is YOUR evidence that YOU acted as a *legal advisor*?

> Are you aware that I defended myself successfully, at the Superior
> Court, Appeals Court, and the Supreme Court in a very high profile,
> internet SLAPP suit?

Gee Ilena - I was certain that you had overly expensive legal counsel,
who were looking out for the interests of internet giants, and ISPs.
That they came to your aid, in order to protect their own business
interests - third party vulnerability and all.  How does Mark
Goldowitz feel about your claiming that "you" defended yourself
successfully???  Bottom line, I think you have performed enough first
party libel, that had you been litigated for a bit of it, you wouldn't
have stood a snow ball's chance in hell of prevailing.

I also note that you fail to mention your previous loss in your $100
Million dollar lawsuit against AOL, an implant victim, and Patrick
O'Leary.  You remember the case - You lost.  The defendants attorney
fees were awarded, but you have refused to pay.

> Why does my support group continue to thrive.

Ilena - If your support group continues to thrive so well, why aren't
they all contributing and supporting each other on ASBI.  Do you
realize that about the only breast implant women, who ever post there
are Coleah, Pam, myself, sometimes Ruby?  And you are at war with most
of us - if not all of us!
------------------------------

Oh, my.  You and Coleah are not at war with IIena??

> People can look at my work and decide for themselves, Myrl ...

And they DO!

YES, and IIena is spot on about the *gang*.
That includes you, Coleah, Mark S Probert
and others.

> You refuse to say who you are speaking for here ... who is the "us"
> Myrl. Who is the "we" ?????

I would NEVER be so stupid as to provide names of who I speak
privately with.
-------------------------------
Translation the us and we was made up.

That's all we would need in the victim community, is
to have one additional abusive and libelous webpage created by you,
-------------------------------------------------

They were created from the very own words, the lies, the name calling, the
*gang*
behavior.  Neither are they abusive or libelous.
What about the abusive, libelous and childish pages from you and Coleah??

to
be added to the dozens you already host on your non-profit webspace.
And more newsgroups tirades with your plastering individual's names
all over the internet with your libelous and venomous spew.
-------------------------------------

You forgot to mention how Coleah posted a reverse directory on what
she thought were my neighbors.  Names, addresses and phone numbers
of innocent people.

Aren't her pictures of her fat body, making fun of breasts cute, etc, eh,
Myrl?

> I know millions of people, millions of "US" that would be benefitted
> by "overturning Daubert."

Millions and millions of people "may" benefit from the overturning of
Daubert Ilena.  Even "YOU" as you state.  However, it is a travesty
that you think that it is OK for the breast implant women to have the
CBT fund ripped off, to foot the bill for it (unbeknownst to breast
implant women).  YOU are not a breast implant woman.
===========================
ZZzz.  So what?  All the more reason to honor all her good works.
Have you opened up your home to abused women, Myrl?

And I'm so glad
you are being very transparent in YOUR approval of this secretive
diversion of funds from the CBT to SKAPP for you other pet projects,
which have NOTHING to do with the victims of breast implants.

> Who is YOUR "us" Myrl????????????

Again Ilena - I will NEVER out women I communicate with privately.
---------------------------------------------
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.attn-deficit/msg/b47238df12888f43

Anecdotes are not facts. They are, at best interesting stories. At
worst, outright lies.  Mark S Probert, Merrick, NY.
YOUR buddy.
Says all we need to know about you, Myrl StraightJacketCoat.
Opps, I meant Jeffcoat. *;*

More continual blathering snipped.
Myrl - 04 Jun 2008 05:40 GMT
|_______________________________|______|
0         20         40         60         80       100
        JAN DREW TROLL-O-METER
Coleah - 04 Jun 2008 15:17 GMT
> You forgot to mention how Coleah posted a reverse directory on what
> she thought were my neighbors.  Names, addresses and phone numbers
> of innocent people.

"My trailer is what we take to Florida. It is a 2000, 40' with a 21'
slide out and another in the bedroom and has sliding glass doors, with
a truck to match. Pure luxury.  Right now, I am at home. Did you think
I lived in a trailer park??
Jan "

Opps.....the son lived in the trailer park.  Not Jan Drew.  She just
lives in the white trailer and matching truck, eh?

http://maps.live.com/default.aspx?v=2&cp=39.139877~-86.581459&style=a&lvl=19&til
t=-90&dir=0&alt=-1000&encType=1

Jan Drew - 06 Jun 2008 02:50 GMT
On Jun 3, 10:41 pm, "Jan Drew" <jdrew1...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

> You forgot to mention how Coleah posted a reverse directory on what
> she thought were my neighbors. Names, addresses and phone numbers
> of innocent people.

"My trailer is what we take to Florida. It is a 2000, 40' with a 21'
slide out and another in the bedroom and has sliding glass doors, with
a truck to match. Pure luxury.  Right now, I am at home. Did you think
I lived in a trailer park??
Jan "
===================
Correct. Did you ever answer??
Evidently, you don't know the meaning of *home* and *house*.

Opps.....the son lived in the trailer park.
-------------------------
What son?

Not Jan Drew.  She just
lives in the white trailer and matching truck, eh?
-----------------------------------
Thought you said you came by my house?
Forget that?

Um. get updated, *nosey* Coleah.

http://maps.live.com/default.aspx?v=2&cp=39.139877~-86.581459&style=a&lvl=19&til
t=-90&dir=0&alt=-1000&encType=1


That is supposed to be what?

Guess you missed my posts telling of our permanent place looking out out my
beautiful view across the water.

We have been blessed and worked hard.  We have two places.  We sold our
beautiful rig.
All of which has nothing to do with your *nosey* reverse directory posting
of innocent peoples' names,
addresses and phone numbers.  While accusing me of sticking my nose in your
business.

Loser, despicable trash mouth, and proven liar, Coleah P Ayres.
Firefly - 06 Jun 2008 03:20 GMT
> On Jun 3, 10:41 pm, "Jan Drew" <jdrew1...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> > You forgot to mention how Coleah posted a reverse directory on what
> > she thought were my neighbors. Names, addresses and phone numbers
> > of innocent people.

> "My trailer is what we take to Florida. It is a 2000, 40' with a 21'
> slide out and another in the bedroom and has sliding glass doors, with
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> Loser, despicable trash mouth, and proven liar, Coleah P Ayres.

"Sticking your nose ?".......I thought it was 'Picking' !
http://www.ilena-rosenthal.com/47.jpg

http://maps.live.com/default.aspx?v=2&cp=39.139877~-86.581459&style=a&lvl=19&til
t=-90&dir=0&alt=-1000&encType=1


Now......are you going to admit you lied and made up the story about
where Myrl got her information????????    You are evading being 100%
responsible.
x
x
x
Jan Drew - 06 Jun 2008 03:39 GMT
Coleah (aka)"Firefly" <dobbins@grm.net>

On Jun 5, 8:50 pm, "Jan Drew" <jdrew1...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

>> You forgot to mention how Coleah posted a reverse directory on what
>> she thought were my neighbors. Names, addresses and phone numbers
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>
> Loser, despicable trash mouth, and proven liar, Coleah P Ayres.
Coleah - 06 Jun 2008 03:51 GMT
> Coleah (aka)"Firefly" <dobb...@grm.net>
>
[quoted text clipped - 48 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

"Sticking your nose ?".......I thought it was "Picking" !!!
http://www.ilena-rosenthal.com/47.jpg

http://maps.live.com/default.aspx?v=2&cp=39.139877~-86.581459&style=a&lvl=19&til
t=-90&dir=0&alt=-1000&encType=1


Now are you going to admit that you lied and made up the story about
where Myrl got he information from?   False witnessing is okay for
you ???
*
*
Coleah - 06 Jun 2008 03:28 GMT
> On Jun 3, 10:41 pm, "Jan Drew" <jdrew1...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> Guess you missed my posts telling of our permanent place looking out out my
> beautiful view across the water.
**
> We have been blessed and worked hard.  We have two places.  We sold our
> beautiful rig.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Loser, despicable trash mouth, and proven liar, Coleah P Ayres.

"Sticking your nose ?".......I thought it was "Picking" !!!
http://www.ilena-rosenthal.com/47.jpg

http://maps.live.com/default.aspx?v=2&cp=39.139877~-86.581459&style=a&lvl=19&til
t=-90&dir=0&alt=-1000&encType=1


Now are you going to admit that you lied and made up the story about
where Myrl got he information from?   False witnessing is okay for
you ???
*
*
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.