Nostalgia - selective quoting

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

Peter Bowditch - 30 Jul 2003 00:44 GMT

Here's a little something I dredged up from my "sent items" folder.
Please note that I restricted my quote mining to the New Testament so
that I could not be accused of anything non-Christian.

Luke 3:24
Which was [the son] of Matthat, which was [the son] of Levi, which was
[the son] of Melchi, which was [the son] of Janna, which was [the son]
of Joseph,

John 2:9
When the ruler of the feast had tasted the water that was made wine,
and knew not whence it was: (but the servants which drew the water
knew;) the governor of the feast called the bridegroom,

Acts 1:12
Then returned they unto Jerusalem from the mount called Olivet, which
is from Jerusalem a sabbath day's journey.

James 5:20
Let him know, that he which converteth the sinner from the error of
his way shall save a soul from death, and shall hide a multitude of
sins.

Revelation 5:11
And I beheld, and I heard the voice of many angels round about the
throne and the beasts and the elders: and the number of them was ten
thousand times ten thousand, and thousands of thousands;

Revelation 13:3
And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly
wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast.

You will see from these that the Bible says:

"Janna"

"drew"

"is ... a"

"sinner ... and"

"the voice of"

"the beast"
--
Peter Bowditch peterb@ratbags.com
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
The Green Light http://www.ratbags.com/greenlight
I'm a Bright. Are you?

Reply to this Message

fred & michele - 30 Jul 2003 01:57 GMT

> Here's a little something I dredged up from my "sent items" folder.
> Please note that I restricted my quote mining to the New Testament so
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
>
> "the beast"

Glad to see you *changed* nothing -- after all, the Bible is there for all
to read........<G>

Michele
I ENJOY being a cranky bitch.

Reply to this Message

Jan - 30 Jul 2003 07:25 GMT

>Subject: Nostalgia - selective quoting
>From: Peter Bowditch peterb@ratbags.com
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
>
>"the beast"

Poor Peter, are you having a break down because you know you lied again, and
can't post your proof??

I am still waiting.

Subject: Re: More Happenings in Wisconsin
From: jdrew63929@aol.com (Jan)
Date: 7/28/2003 8:29 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <20030729002930.18214.00000628@mb-m17.aol.com>

>Subject: Re: More Happenings in Wisconsin
>From: Peter Bowditch peterb@ratbags.com
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>If you can't produce any evidence for the defence, start discrediting
>the prosecutor.

Did he discredit himself???

>>The complaint states in part: "The said Thexton has used his office to
>defraud
>>the State of Wisconsin of in excess of $75,000.00 (Seventy-five thousand
>>"dollars") in conspiracy with one Robert S. Baratz, knowing the same Baratz
>to
>>be incompetent as an "expert witness", or having been required to

ascertain the

>>competency of the said Baratz prior to engaging Baratz's "services" on
>behalf
>>of the State of Wisconsin."

>If you can't produce any evidence for the defence, start discrediting
>the witnesses.

If they are LYING, they will get more than discrediting. It is a FACT that
Baratz has LIED before, UNDER OATH!!!

>>Then it goes on to say "The same Thexton has attempted, and continues to
>>attempt to extort performance of the undersigned, knowing, or being required
>by
>>his alleged training and professional experience to know, that neither
>Thexton
>>nor the Division of Enforcement,

Department of Regulation and Licensing, State

>>of Wisconsin have jurisdiction and/ or authority over the personal and
>private
>>activities and relationships of the undersigned."

>If you can't produce any evidence for the defence, start discrediting
>the prosecutor.

You just can't face the truth, can you Peter??

>>And then it says "The enclosed documents shall provide prima facie evidence
>of
>>the malevolent intent and illegal and unlawful acts of the said Thexton.
>>Documentation is being acquired as evidence of the conversion of funds of
>the
>>State of Wisconsin by Arthur Thexton in conspiracy with Robert S. Baratz."

>If you can't produce any evidence for the defence, start discrediting
>the prosecutor.

Uh huh.

You are running out of gas, so you have to repeat yourself.

>Stay tuned...
>>
>>Tim Bolen - Consumer Advocate

>Thank you, Jan, for passing this on, despite your dislike of Tim Bolen
>and his tactics.

You are welcome.

>Do you have any idea when Bolen and his cronies are
>going to produce their expert witness who can testify that using the
>wrong chemical for chelation is acceptable medical practice?

The only source of what is going on is being posted by Tim. I am sure you
received it also.

>If I
>remember correctly, you have had much to say in the past about doctors
>administering the wrong chemical and, at the risk of being accused of
>lying, I also seem to recall that you used an example of this to
>demonise real doctors.

Do post where I demonised them.

You couldn't before, so as the old saying goes, put up or shut up.

You are LYING right through your teeth.

This is EXACTLY what I said:

From: Jan (jdrew63929@aol.com)
Subject: Re: A Lesson from Ben
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
View: Complete Thread (21 articles) |
Date: 2002-01-02 11:01:59 PST

<snipping to the *only* thing said about the doctor>

Yes. They did the right thing and my heart goes out to the doctor, and all
those involved. The parents in turn also did the right thing and dropped the
lawsuit. I was indeed very sad for everyone. This is why I started my post with
this sentence.

This post is NOT intended to go after any *ONE* individual.

Just where do you see any demonising??

Now do the right thing and post the proof or your claim. Otherwise be shown as
a REPEATED liar.

>In summary, here is the defence case for Dr Kadile:

NO,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,we don't need YOUR summary.

Now do post where I demonized any doctor in the Ben Kolb case.

I will be waiting. Neither will it do any good for your buddies to jump in, I
want to see the post from you.

It is D day time. And remember YOU BROUGHT IT UP.

Jan

PS. What happen to this??

A new moratorium on discussion with those who refuse to comprehend and
who selectively snip (sometimes without mentioning it) has been
declared until further notice. I will, however, address this last
message.

Ah??

Reply to this Message

Rich Shewmaker - 30 Jul 2003 09:33 GMT

>...........because you know you lied again, and

$ KaChing $97

Reply to this Message