Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Alternative / May 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Autism: another clue

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
D. C. Sessions - 05 May 2008 15:36 GMT
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080505/hl_nm/autism_parents_dc;_ylt=AngapHZ3.vKydBK
B7z3_HzNa24cA


No comment.

| sh.t happens.  Sometimes it happens to you. |
+--- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ---+
drceephd@insightbb.com - 05 May 2008 21:35 GMT
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080505/hl_nm/autism_parents_dc;_ylt=Anga...
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> | sh.t happens.  Sometimes it happens to you. |
> +--- D. C. Sessions <d...@lumbercartel.com> ---+

Well, I have a comment.

Children get their genetic inhiertance from their parents.

Autistic children have been shown to be unable to excrete mercury
efficiently.

Therefore they received this inability from their parents.

One or more of their parents must have the same trait of not being
able to excrete mercury efficiently.

One of more of the parents show mercury toxicity as a psychological
disorder.

What could be more logical?  It is mercury toxicity.  The trait to not
be able to handle mercury is inheirtable.  Duh.

It is not the trait.  It is the mercury.

Perhaps we need to pass laws that those who cannot excrete mercury
efficiently and are too poisoned by it must be tested and not allowed
to eat fish, live downwind from a power plant, nor ever be vaccinated.

DrCee
You cannot secure nor restore health with pus or poisons.
D. C. Sessions - 06 May 2008 03:48 GMT
>> http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080505/hl_nm/autism_parents_dc;_ylt=Anga...
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Autistic children have been shown to be unable to excrete mercury
> efficiently.

No, that's an inference from the fact that autistic children
don't have more mercury in their hair than non-autistic kids,
therefore (assuming that mercury is *the* cause of autism)
it must follow that they have a lower rate of mercury clearance.

In other words, you're now going in circles.

| sh.t happens.  Sometimes it happens to you. |
+--- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ---+
drceephd@insightbb.com - 06 May 2008 14:57 GMT
> In message <5cbf55db-a6cd-42dc-a9eb-7f629de23...@e39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, drcee...@insightbb.com wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> | sh.t happens.  Sometimes it happens to you. |
> +--- D. C. Sessions <d...@lumbercartel.com> ---+

The tests confirm that autistic children have less mercury in their
hair than normal children because the autistics cannot efficiently
excrete mercury.
Further testing using the proper chelating agents not only shows
increased mercury levels in the hair, but in the stool and urine as
well.
The further fact that many of these children properly treated early
enough return to normalcy is further confirmation of the mercury
connection.

Why not just chelate the kids, and tell the disease industry to pay
for it, while the kids are young enough to benefit greatly from the
medical procedure?  Then other docs can still run around with their
heads up their butts searching for an anwer and get overpaid to
accomplish nothing.

DrCee
You cannot secure nor restore health with pus or poisons.
D. C. Sessions - 06 May 2008 15:41 GMT
>> In message <5cbf55db-a6cd-42dc-a9eb-7f629de23...@e39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, drcee...@insightbb.com wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> hair than normal children because the autistics cannot efficiently
> excrete mercury.

Precisely --  you're starting with the assumption that autistics
have more mercury.  From there you're excusing the LACK of mercury
excretion as proof that there is mercury present!

> The further fact that many of these children properly treated early
> enough return to normalcy is further confirmation of the mercury
> connection.

Not according to the practitioners themselves, who seem to require
continuing (and expensive) treatments for pretty much ever.

> Why not just chelate the kids, and tell the disease industry to pay
> for it, while the kids are young enough to benefit greatly from the
> medical procedure?  Then other docs can still run around with their
> heads up their butts searching for an anwer and get overpaid to
> accomplish nothing.

Why not "jut chelate the kids?"
Here's why:

> You cannot secure nor restore health with pus or poisons.

Chelation is administration of "poisons" -- and yet somehow
you're all in favor of it, and have nothing but praise for
the people who killed Abubakar Tariq Nadama.

For some reason, the supposed "pharma shills" here are against
administration of extremely expensive (read: profitable) drugs.
Heads explode all over.

| sh.t happens.  Sometimes it happens to you. |
+--- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ---+
drceephd@insightbb.com - 06 May 2008 17:07 GMT
> > The tests confirm that autistic children have less mercury in their
> > hair than normal children because the autistics cannot efficiently
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> have more mercury.  From there you're excusing the LACK of mercury
> excretion as proof that there is mercury present!

My assumption is that both the autistics and the normal kids were
injected with the same amounts of mercury, aluminum, and vaccine
toxins.
Since the autistics cannot excrete mercury efficiently, the hypothesis
is that the mercury is still there, most likely in the CNS.

> > The further fact that many of these children properly treated early
> > enough return to normalcy is further confirmation of the mercury
> > connection.
>
> Not according to the practitioners themselves, who seem to require
> continuing (and expensive) treatments for pretty much ever.

Nope, wrong again.  Only current medical treatment requires expensive
and continuing treatments and drugs forever.  Once the kid has been
detoxed, the chelation can be stopped.  Then, if needed, your
expensive and continuing treatments and drugs may be needed and used.

> > Why not just chelate the kids, and tell the disease industry to pay
> > for it, while the kids are young enough to benefit greatly from the
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> you're all in favor of it, and have nothing but praise for
> the people who killed Abubakar Tariq Nadama.

The difference is that I have the ability to think and reason.  The TD-
DMPS treatments are being used as anti-dotes, not poisons to be taken
for a lifetime.  I do not oppose of chelation anymore than I oppose
sedation or anethesia for surgery.

> For some reason, the supposed "pharma shills" here are against
> administration of extremely expensive (read: profitable) drugs.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

DrCee
You cannot secure nor restore health with pus or poisons.
D. C. Sessions - 17 May 2008 23:09 GMT
>> > The tests confirm that autistic children have less mercury in their
>> > hair than normal children because the autistics cannot efficiently
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> injected with the same amounts of mercury, aluminum, and vaccine
> toxins.

No problem with the /ab initio/ assumption that there is no difference
between autistic and non-autistic children in exposure to heavy metals.

> Since the autistics cannot excrete mercury efficiently, the hypothesis
> is that the mercury is still there, most likely in the CNS.

On the other hand, the assumption that autistic children are less able
to excrete heavy metals than non-autistics is not in evidence.

>> > The further fact that many of these children properly treated early
>> > enough return to normalcy is further confirmation of the mercury
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> detoxed, the chelation can be stopped.  Then, if needed, your
> expensive and continuing treatments and drugs may be needed and used.

http://www.benutsnews.com/chelation_at_cmrs.htm
"The infusion typically lasts 3-4 hours and is done weekly for a period
of weeks or months. Monthly or Bi-monthly treatments are often done for
maintenance therapy."

"Weeks or months" is cited elsewhere as about 18 months.  That's about
40 initial chelation treatments over a year and a half, then twelve to
twenty-four for life.

>> > Why not just chelate the kids, and tell the disease industry to pay
>> > for it, while the kids are young enough to benefit greatly from the
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> for a lifetime.  I do not oppose of chelation anymore than I oppose
> sedation or anethesia for surgery.

So in other words, your "you cannot secore ... poisons" has special
exceptions for "poisons" that you approve of.  Nice to be so special.

| sh.t happens.  Sometimes it happens to you. |
+--- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ---+
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.