 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / General / Alternative / May 2008Intelligent Design versus Science
With so many sceptics posting their views I am wondering if some of them may post their thoughts on "Intelligent Design". I am of the view that "Intelligent Design" is a reality and that creation is not by chance. Rod > With so many sceptics posting their views I am wondering if some of them may > post their thoughts on "Intelligent Design". You want opinion? It's a relabeling of creationism in the attempt to sneak it into schools. Nothing explicitly wrong with creationism; like any religious belief it's a private matter. "Intelligent design" to me signals that the people pushing it have lost their faith in their faith, though, and are going for marketing as a substitute. > I am of the view that "Intelligent Design" is a reality and that creation is > not by chance. Your religion is up to you. I wish you joy. | sh.t happens. Sometimes it happens to you. | +--- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ---+ >With so many sceptics posting their views I am wondering if some of them may >post their thoughts on "Intelligent Design". [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >Rod Creation? I suppose you mean evolution, not creation. While the mutations are random, natural selection (and sexual selection etc) is not. The result is anything but chance. And BTW, even if life is created by some designer, it's evolving today. Life is evolving, created or not. Get used to it. And the problem with ID is that it is not science. Bring in the supernatural, and you're outside of science. ID doesn't do any science, has no proposal for research and the only thing it has to say about how life came to be what it is today is 'goddidit'. Oh, I'm sorry, 'some unnamed unspecified designer didit'. All ID does is bash evolution, and so far each and every example they came up with that according to them could not have evolved has been proven to have evolved. Just look up the Kitzmiller case. >> With so many sceptics posting their views I am wondering if some of them may >> post their thoughts on "Intelligent Design". [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > according to them could not have evolved has been proven to have > evolved. Just look up the Kitzmiller case. When will those brainless people realize that there is not the slightest shred of evidence that a GAWD exists. >>> With so many sceptics posting their views I am wondering if some of them may >>> post their thoughts on "Intelligent Design". [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] >there is not the slightest shred of evidence that >a GAWD exists. Except of course the Flying Spaghetti Monster. Blessed be his noodly appendage. > When will those brainless people realize that > there is not the slightest shred of evidence that > a GAWD exists.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - When will those brainless people realize that there is not the slightest shred of evidence that a GAWD DOES not exist? As a scientist, I must believe in Intelligent Design. The concept of evolution violates at least two fundamental scientific principles. Mathematically we cannot exist. What is the probability of winning a state lottery every day for several million years? This is a requirement for evolution to be mathematically correct. Even then, it has to happen exactly twice and at the same time for both male and female to appear on the scene. Chemically, the law of entropy has to be violated. Put a drop of dye in a glass of water and let it spead out. How many billions of years might we have to wait for the original drop of dye to be reformed? Lastly, I have yet to see life created in the lab. What is the difference between a living person and that same person a few minutes after death? The life force is missing. What is it? Where does it come from? How is it generated? It has been scientifically verified to weigh about 28 grams, about one ounce. It is most difficult to believe that all the order in this world was created out of random dis-order by chance or by accident. DrCee You cannot secure nor restore health with pus or poisons. >> When will those brainless people realize that >> there is not the slightest shred of evidence that [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >As a scientist, I must believe in Intelligent Design. The concept of >evolution violates at least two fundamental scientific principles. As a scientist, you wouldn't even make a good janitor. But since you're not a scientist, as is constantly evidenced by the howlers you post, it doesn't really matter. >Mathematically we cannot exist. What is the probability of winning a >state lottery every day for several million years? This is a >requirement for evolution to be mathematically correct. Even then, it >has to happen exactly twice and at the same time for both male and >female to appear on the scene. A completely nonsensical statement about the nature of male and female. No evolutionary biologist is claiming that both genders just popped up at random, so your assertion is merely ridiculous. >Chemically, the law of entropy has to be violated. Put a drop of dye >in a glass of water and let it spead out. How many billions of years >might we have to wait for the original drop of dye to be reformed? It's a frequent assertion of ignoramuses (like you) that evolution violates entropy. It doesn't, any more than the fact that you started out as a single cell and are now billions of them violates entropy. >Lastly, I have yet to see life created in the lab. Evolution does not make any claims about how life was created, just what happens once it exists. >It is most difficult to believe that all the order in this world was >created out of random dis-order by chance or by accident. It is most difficult to believe that someone as dim as you can operate a computer, but you seem to manage it. The 'argument from incredulity' is merely a reflection of your ignorance and lack of imagination. It's not a valid argument against anything. -- David Wright :: alphabeta at copper.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "There are two kinds of Republicans: millionaires and suckers." -- John Dolan Not Alternative Health. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.