 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / General / Alternative / May 2008It is moronic and grossly immoral....
It is a FACT that some people react badly to vaccinations. The percentage of these reactions may be extremely small. It may be that the benefits for society out weigh the negatives. However, when you are looking at a child with a known bad reaction and because of your ideology about what is good public policy insist that that child who already had a bad reaction get another vaccination, now that is profoundly stupid, cruel, and evil. It is because of these kinds of fanatacism on both sides that people are being hurt and/or not getting the benefits that they could. I decided to vaccinate my precious darling for polio because of his special case of going to a polio infested part of the world. And because of his special case, I decide to not vaccinate him again. The fanatical anti-vaccination people will condemn me for vaccinating him in the first place for polio, EVEN THOUGH HIS CASE WAS SPECIAL. And the fanatical pro-vaccination people will condemn me for not continuing to vaccinate him, EVEN THOUGH HE HAD A BAD REACTION ALREADY. Both groups are stupid. However, the pro-vaccination people are both stupid, immoral, and insulting. >It is a FACT that some people react badly to vaccinations. The >percentage of these reactions may be extremely small. It may be that [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] >Both groups are stupid. However, the pro-vaccination people are both >stupid, immoral, and insulting. And what would you call calling people profoundly stupid, cruel, evil, moronic, grossly immoral, stupid, immoral and insulting? Polite rational discussion? > It is a FACT that some people react badly to vaccinations. The > percentage of these reactions may be extremely small. It may be that [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > already had a bad reaction get another vaccination, now that is > profoundly stupid, cruel, and evil. ....snippy snip All I asked you to do is to present the real actual evidence that the IPV, DTaP and/or MMR are more dangerous than the diseases themselvles. > Both groups are stupid. However, the pro-vaccination people are both > stupid, immoral, and insulting. Please tell me how it is insulting to ask for evidence? > Please tell me how it is insulting to ask for evidence? You're kidding, right? | sh.t happens. Sometimes it happens to you. | +--- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ---+ > | sh.t happens. Sometimes it happens to you. | > D. C. Sessions <dcs@lymbercartel.com> >> Please tell me how it is insulting to ask for evidence? > > You're kidding, right? ... That depends on if we are using Bizarro World standards or not. >>> Please tell me how it is insulting to ask for evidence? >> >> You're kidding, right? > > That depends on if we are using Bizarro World standards or not. Check the "Newsgroups:" line. | sh.t happens. Sometimes it happens to you. | +--- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ---+ TCN (aka)"HCN" Forgets she thinks it is A OK to have a vested interest in vaccines. >> It is a FACT that some people react badly to vaccinations. The >> percentage of these reactions may be extremely small. It may be that [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >> already had a bad reaction get another vaccination, now that is >> profoundly stupid, cruel, and evil. snippy snip >> Both groups are stupid. However, the pro-vaccination people are both >> stupid, immoral, and insulting. Correction: TDN > TCN (aka)"HCN" Forgets she thinks it is A OK to have a vested interest in > vaccines. [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >>> Both groups are stupid. However, the pro-vaccination people are both >>> stupid, immoral, and insulting. >It is a FACT that some people react badly to vaccinations. The >percentage of these reactions may be extremely small. It may be that [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >already had a bad reaction get another vaccination, now that is >profoundly stupid, cruel, and evil. I agree that a bad reaction can be a good reason not to vaccinate that person with any more of the same vaccine. Whether it is also sensible to not give that person any vaccines at all is a different question. -- David Wright :: alphabeta at copper.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "There are two kinds of Republicans: millionaires and suckers." -- John Dolan > It is a FACT that some people react badly to vaccinations. The > percentage of these reactions may be extremely small. It may be that [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > already had a bad reaction get another vaccination, now that is > profoundly stupid, cruel, and evil. Hi. You are quite wrong. Previous vaccination reactions are a listed contraindication to furhter vaccination in many cases. > It is because of these kinds of fanatacism The only fanaticism that I see is the fanatic fabrication of false issues, like you posted in your first paragraph. > on both sides that people > are being hurt and/or not getting the benefits that they could. I [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > continuing to vaccinate him, EVEN THOUGH HE HAD A BAD REACTION > ALREADY. Nope. Not at all. If your child had an adverse reaction, then, after proper discussion with your child's pediatrician you decide not to continue to vaccinate, that is your choice. Just expect it to be very hard to attend public school, and, if your child is able to attend, expect that your child will be required to stay home during outbreaks. > Both groups are stupid. However, the pro-vaccination people are both > stupid, immoral, and insulting. Nah. Only those who post moronic diatribes fit those standards. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.