Medical Forum / General / Alternative / May 2008
Newsgroup Disclosure for MHA
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Myrl - 30 Apr 2008 23:51 GMT For those participating, it is important to understand this Newsgroup is an "open" internet forum. As such, those participating in dialogue need to remember postings are saved and archived for retrieval at any time.
If you are in any type of litigation, it may be in your best interest to guard what you say here, and decline sharing personal information about yourself. In fact, it’s a good idea to protect your privacy regardless. Real agendas, of those posting to or reading this board may not be known.
There have been incidents of misguided individuals contacting aging parents, children, spouses and employers, of those they have difference of opinions with! This is an additional reason to choose your involvement with this board wisely.
In addition, simply because a person on this board is giving what APPEARS to be a legitimate identity, and is PURPORTING to have an interest in health issues, or is an advocate, simply doesn't make it so.
Because the possibility of collecting up information (to possibly be used against them in litigation), and/or the ability to solicit donations from them for "non-profit" purposes, or for other nefarious reasons makes newsgroups a natural place to dwell.
If a person purporting to be an advocate regularly uses foul or disrespectful language in their communication on this board, they are likely offending a good portion of the public in so doing. When these individuals offend the public, they are in the process of dividing public opinion against the collective community of those they proclaim to be advocating for, and are often seen as a PR nightmare to those they represent.
There is a very old adage (and a game show), that a chain is only as strong as it's weakest link. Collectively, mankind can only progress or achieve, as much as the weakest link will allow.
Advice regarding legal representation on this board, is only as good as the person doing the steering, and that steering may be in a direction 180 degrees the opposite direction of where you need to go.
This "IS" a place to discuss and debate the pro's and con's of alternative health. Although it may have been the intent of the original charter to expect respectful dialogue, newsgroups dwell in the wild, wild west of the internet, and no mandates can be really imposed, other than those enforced by Google, or other providers of newsgroups.
Unfortunately, due to the loose nature of this board, there have been ongoing, arguments, fighting and disputes between individuals, which have little to do with health interests.
It is imperative that you “attempt” to keep your life private. For the sake and safety of your privacy, it is likely a good idea to adopt a screen identity, and provide little personal information about yourself. More than most newsgroups, this newsgroup seems to be over populated with those obsessed with investigating the lives of others, and then broadcasting that information to the internet, web sites, and this newsgroup. Yet, many of those suffering from investigation obsession, tend to enjoy hiding in the shadows when it comes to revealing information about themselves!
Jan Drew - 01 May 2008 06:01 GMT For those participating, it is important to understand this Newsgroup is an "open" internet forum. As such, those participating in dialogue need to remember postings are saved and archived for retrieval at any time.
If you are in any type of litigation, it may be in your best interest to guard what you say here, and decline sharing personal information about yourself. In fact, it’s a good idea to protect your privacy regardless. Real agendas, of those posting to or reading this board may not be known.
There have been incidents of misguided individuals contacting aging parents, children, spouses and employers, of those they have difference of opinions with! This is an additional reason to choose your involvement with this board wisely.
You mean like Mark S Probert, Merrick, NY?
In addition, simply because a person on this board is giving what APPEARS to be a legitimate identity, and is PURPORTING to have an interest in health issues, or is an advocate, simply doesn't make it so.
Because the possibility of collecting up information (to possibly be used against them in litigation), and/or the ability to solicit donations from them for "non-profit" purposes, or for other nefarious reasons makes newsgroups a natural place to dwell.
If a person purporting to be an advocate regularly uses foul or disrespectful language in their communication on this board, they are likely offending a good portion of the public in so doing.
Like--Coleah, Peter Bowditch, Mark S Probert, your buddies you defend.
When these individuals offend the public, they are in the process of dividing public opinion against the collective community of those they proclaim to be advocating for, and are often seen as a PR nightmare to those they represent.
There is a very old adage (and a game show), that a chain is only as strong as it's weakest link. Collectively, mankind can only progress or achieve, as much as the weakest link will allow.
Advice regarding legal representation on this board, is only as good as the person doing the steering, and that steering may be in a direction 180 degrees the opposite direction of where you need to go.
This "IS" a place to discuss and debate the pro's and con's of alternative health. Although it may have been the intent of the original charter to expect respectful dialogue, newsgroups dwell in the wild, wild west of the internet, and no mandates can be really imposed, other than those enforced by Google, or other providers of newsgroups.
Unfortunately, due to the loose nature of this board, there have been ongoing, arguments, fighting and disputes between individuals, which have little to do with health interests.
Ongoing fight like yours.
It is imperative that you “attempt” to keep your life private.
Like you did?
Even your picture has been posted.
For the sake and safety of your privacy, it is likely a good idea to adopt a screen identity, and provide little personal information about yourself. More than most newsgroups, this newsgroup seems to be over populated with those obsessed with investigating the lives of others, and then broadcasting that information to the internet, web sites, and this newsgroup. Yet, many of those suffering from investigation obsession, tend to enjoy hiding in the shadows when it comes to revealing information about themselves!
Suffering because THEY posted personal information...
Coleah - 01 May 2008 12:32 GMT > If a person purporting to be an advocate regularly uses foul or > disrespectful language in their communication on this board, they are > likely offending a good portion of the public in so doing. > > Like--Coleah, Peter Bowditch, Mark S Probert, your buddies you defend. If you have a problem with my communication....stick it up your hair a.s, Jan Drew. God bless America!! Land of the "I'm offended" ????
Peter Bowditch - 02 May 2008 00:02 GMT >> If a person purporting to be an advocate regularly uses foul or >> disrespectful language in their communication on this board, they are [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >a.s, Jan Drew. God bless America!! >Land of the "I'm offended" ???? I'm reminded of something said in an interview with that fine actor Stephen Fry: "So you're offended. So f.cking what?".
 Signature Peter Bowditch aa #2243 The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
Butterflies1111@gmail.com - 01 May 2008 06:38 GMT > It is imperative that you “attempt” to keep your life private. For > the sake and safety of your privacy, it is likely a good idea to adopt [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > obsession, tend to enjoy hiding in the shadows when it comes to > revealing information about themselves! Ofcourse it is, however, when I left my former location, the "nosey" private investigator that moved into my previous neighborhood under suspicious conditions that spent his days and nights terrorizing the families that lived there would appear to be connected to individuals in this forum. If I hadn't had the experience of that entire ordeal I wouldn't not have known what has been transpiring here on this forum, and off of the forum that carried over into my own personal life now as it had previously. And based on the information that I did not put in my computer that ended up in my computer, I found it of total disrespect by the individuals that have taken it upon themselves to pry into my own personal life, using electronic technology to gain information and my whereabouts. Where I live, who I am, where I work, is no one's business but mine. It would appear that previous nosey neighbor would appear to be connected to individuals in that come to this forum to speak against alternative health practices. The same practice of using electronic technology to gain entrance into one's private life is not acceptable behavior that I am willing to tolerate. This is why I have taken the necessary steps to do what I have to do to get the individuals responsible for this illegal entry into my life, out of my life. I do not know which one of you signed me up for Reunion.com, but I did not sign up for this. But prying into one's computer to find out what they are writing or not writing is acceptable behavior. Using electronic surveillance to eavesdrop into private home conversations, telephone calls, landline or cellular without a court order is illegal, and I got a head's two weeks ago from someone that appeared to have quite a bit of knowledge as to where I lived, had my telephone numbers, and told me about letters I had received and written in email. There have been bits and pieces of my telephone conversations, and in home conversations that have found their way in bent and twisted formats to this forum. I have found faked emails from my account, and emails from people I do not know responding to emails I have sent others that do not even belong in this forum. It would appear that anyone that speaks up in support of PRO Choice in healthcare issues is targeted as if those that favor whatever works for them is not acceptable to the peanut gallery on this forum. My life is my business. Who I happen to invite in to share it with me, is my business, and the rest that butt into my private life will be butting out. In my humble opinion, it would appear that there may have been individuals or groups that choose to put up collateral for lawsuits and are angry that they lost what they put up, and are trying to find some way of getting it back. And by attacking individuals that they believe may have been responsible for their loss of funds, it would appear that they are attempting to get back what they believe is theirs. I came to this forum to learn about different forms of alternative therapies and to share with others, not to be attacked for my choices, nor my desire to learn more. I support some forms of alternative health care treatments, and basically use conventional medicine. But I also believe like religion, that choice in healthcare is an individuals choice, and should not be mandated by people who would appear to have a deeper interest in conventional healthcare or the pharmaceutical world, and are also not willing to learn more about safer alternatives for people. People do not tell people which religion that they can practice or belief in; so why should healthcare choices be any different? I have not shared my location, where I work with anyone, my telephone numbers with anyone. My life is my own business not yours. Thank you.
Butterflies1111@gmail.com - 01 May 2008 06:42 GMT > It is imperative that you “attempt” to keep your life private. For > the sake and safety of your privacy, it is likely a good idea to adopt [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > obsession, tend to enjoy hiding in the shadows when it comes to > revealing information about themselves! Ofcourse it is, however, when I left my former location, the "nosey" private investigator that moved into my previous neighborhood under suspicious conditions that spent his days and nights terrorizing the families that lived there would appear to be connected to individuals in this forum. If I hadn't had the experience of that entire ordeal I wouldn't not have known what has been transpiring here on this forum, and off of the forum that carried over into my own personal life now as it had previously. And based on the information that I did not put in my computer that ended up in my computer, I found it of total disrespect by the individuals that have taken it upon themselves to pry into my own personal life, using electronic technology to gain information and my whereabouts. Where I live, who I am, where I work, is no one's business but mine. It would appear that previous nosey neighbor would appear to be connected to individuals in that come to this forum to speak against alternative health practices. The same practice of using electronic technology to gain entrance into one's private life is not acceptable behavior that I am willing to tolerate. This is why I have taken the necessary steps to do what I have to do to get the individuals responsible for this illegal entry into my life, out of my life. I do not know which one of you signed me up for Reunion.com, but I did not sign up for this. But prying into one's computer to find out what they are writing or not writing is not acceptable behavior. Using electronic surveillance to eavesdrop into private home conversations, telephone calls, landline or cellular without a court order is illegal, and I got a head's two weeks ago from someone that appeared to have quite a bit of knowledge as to where I lived, had my telephone numbers, and told me about letters I had received and written in email. There have been bits and pieces of my telephone conversations, and in home conversations that have found their way in bent and twisted formats to this forum. I have found faked emails from my account, and emails from people I do not know responding to emails I have sent others that do not even belong in this forum. It would appear that anyone that speaks up in support of PRO Choice in healthcare issues is targeted as if those that favor whatever works for them is not acceptable to the peanut gallery on this forum. My life is my business. Who I happen to invite in to share it with me, is my business, and the rest that butt into my private life will be butting out. In my humble opinion, it would appear that there may have been individuals or groups that choose to put up collateral for lawsuits and are angry that they lost what they put up, and are trying to find some way of getting it back. And by attacking individuals that they believe may have been responsible for their loss of funds, it would appear that they are attempting to get back what they believe is theirs. I came to this forum to learn about different forms of alternative therapies and to share with others, not to be attacked for my choices, nor my desire to learn more. I support some forms of alternative health care treatments, and basically use conventional medicine. But I also believe like religion, that choice in healthcare is an individuals choice, and should not be mandated by people who would appear to have a deeper interest in conventional healthcare or the pharmaceutical world, and are also not willing to learn more about safer alternatives for people. People do not tell people which religion that they can practice or belief in; so why should healthcare choices be any different? I have not shared my location, where I work with anyone, my telephone numbers with anyone. My life is my own business not yours. Thank you.
PeterB - 02 May 2008 01:37 GMT > There have been incidents of misguided individuals contacting > aging parents, children, spouses and employers of those they have > difference of opinions with! Pharma thugs are known to do this in an effort to silence those of us advocating for natural methods and full dislosure of standard medicine hazards.
> In addition, simply because a person on this board is giving what > APPEARS to be a legitimate identity, and is PURPORTING to have an > interest in health issues, or is an advocate, simply doesn't make > it so. That is one reason why disclosure of personal information is unwise and pointless.
> If a person purporting to be an advocate regularly uses foul or > disrespectful language in their communication on this board, they [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > those they proclaim to be advocating for, and are often seen as a > PR nightmare to those they represent. A number of individuals here are certainly associated with PR projects underwritten anonymously by the media or marketing groups of industry.
> This "IS" a place to discuss and debate the pro's and con's of > alternative health. That's true, which is why personal attacks by those favorable to conventional methods is so concerning. These responses are preemptive and prejudicial and don't foster real discussion. These individuals make every effort to prevent a critical mass of awareness by the public regarding the dangers of standard healthcare and the benefits of natural medicine.
> Unfortunately, due to the loose nature of this board, there have > been ongoing, arguments, fighting and disputes between > individuals, which have little to do with health interests. I have to disagree. While disputes between individuals over industry affiliations might devolve into personal animosities at times, even these are relevant to discussions of public health because those are the issues that fomented those disputes to begin with. No one can separate either their professional *or* charitable advocacy activities from the topics of mha. This battle for mind share between industry and those of us advocating for holistic approaches in healthcare is (as you know) a daily affair.
> More than most newsgroups, this newsgroup seems to be over > populated with those obsessed with investigating the lives of > others, and then broadcasting that information to the internet, > web sites, and this newsgroup. Yet, many of those suffering from > investigation obsession, tend to enjoy hiding in the shadows when > it comes to revealing information about themselves! My own reluctance to provide information about myself is because I don't want to invite such activity. At the same time, disclosure of personal information is not assurance that a poster is free of professional affiliations. A reader must review a poster's history in the archives to have a good sense of their motives and purpose. But thanks, this serves as a reminder that the "Warning" post I circulated before my hiatus should probably go back up. I've been meaning to update it anyway, so I'll do that and put it up later in the week. It's still in the archives under the title "Warning: Industry is Blogging" if anyone is interested. Good points.
Richard Schultz - 02 May 2008 10:03 GMT :> There have been incidents of misguided individuals contacting :> aging parents, children, spouses and employers of those they have :> difference of opinions with!
: Pharma thugs are known to do this in an effort to silence those of us : advocating for natural methods and full dislosure of standard medicine : hazards. And yet you object to full disclosure of the hazards of "nutritional supplements." I wonder why that is.
: A number of individuals here are certainly associated with PR projects : underwritten anonymously by the media or marketing groups of industry. You have yet to provide any evidence for that, or any evidence that you are not what you appear to be, namely, a paid shill for the multi-billion dollar "nutritional supplement" industry.
----- Richard Schultz schultr@mail.biu.ac.il Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University ----- "It is terrible to die of thirst in the ocean. Do you have to salt your truth so heavily that it does not even quench thirst any more?"
D. C. Sessions - 02 May 2008 12:33 GMT > :> There have been incidents of misguided individuals contacting > :> aging parents, children, spouses and employers of those they have [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > And yet you object to full disclosure of the hazards of "nutritional > supplements." I wonder why that is. There's no need to since it's known /a priori/ that there are no such hazards.
| sh.t happens. Sometimes it happens to you. | +--- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ---+
Coleah - 02 May 2008 10:54 GMT > > There have been incidents of misguided individuals contacting > > aging parents, children, spouses and employers of those they have > > difference of opinions with!
> Pharma thugs are known to do this in an effort to silence those of us > advocating for natural methods and full dislosure of standard medicine > hazards. Generalization. Please document verifiable specific incidences.....
In reciprocal theory, see the list of aging parents, children, spouses and employers Ilena Rosenthal has contacted 'in an effort to silence' those very people she (the self-appointed advocate for breast implant women and advertised alternative "Health Lover" nut) has tormented for real: http://www.ilena-rosenthal.com
|
|
|